Massive Spinors and ds/cft Correspondence

Similar documents
Snyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics

Lecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations. Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;

MSci EXAMINATION. Date: XX th May, Time: 14:30-17:00

Introduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory

HIGHER SPIN PROBLEM IN FIELD THEORY

Holographic Wilsonian Renormalization Group

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Separability of Dirac equation in higher dimensional Kerr NUT de Sitter spacetime

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 7: Lectures 13, 14.

Applications of AdS/CFT correspondence to cold atom physics

Massive symmetric tensor field on AdS

Attempts at relativistic QM

Fermi Fields without Tears

SPACETIME FROM ENTANGLEMENT - journal club notes -

International Journal of Theoretical Physics, October 2015, Volume 54, Issue 10, pp ABSTRACT

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 7 Apr 2003

3.3 Lagrangian and symmetries for a spin- 1 2 field

Non-SUSY BSM: Lecture 1/2

Holography for 3D Einstein gravity. with a conformal scalar field

Spinor Representation of Conformal Group and Gravitational Model

Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams

1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge

be stationary under variations in A, we obtain Maxwell s equations in the form ν J ν = 0. (7.5)

Asymptotic Symmetries and Holography

Phys624 Formalism for interactions Homework 6. Homework 6 Solutions Restriction on interaction Lagrangian. 6.1.

The boundary S-matrix and the AdS to CFT dictionary

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 7 Jun 2005

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 22 Jul 2015

Tutorial 5 Clifford Algebra and so(n)

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime

Holographic study of magnetically induced QCD effects:

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 1 Mar 2000

A Brief Introduction to AdS/CFT Correspondence

General Relativity in a Nutshell

PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #6. Problem 1(a): Starting with eq. (3) proved in class and applying the Leibniz rule, we obtain

Classical-quantum Correspondence and Wave Packet Solutions of the Dirac Equation in a Curved Spacetime

Maxwell's equations, quantum physics and the quantum graviton

Baryon Configurations in the UV and IR Regions of Type 0 String Theory

General Relativity (225A) Fall 2013 Assignment 8 Solutions

Heisenberg-Euler effective lagrangians

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 24 Sep 1998

Quantization of scalar fields

arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 18 Apr 2007

Solution of the Dirac equation in presence of an uniform magnetic field

The Klein-Gordon Equation Meets the Cauchy Horizon

Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Field Theory II

Introduction to AdS/CFT

PHY 396 K. Solutions for homework set #9.

T H E K M S - C O N D I T I O N

Cold atoms and AdS/CFT

x 3 x 1 ix 2 x 1 + ix 2 x 3

Discrete symmetry breaking and restoration at finite temperature in 3D Gross-Neveu model

Free totally (anti)symmetric massless fermionic fields in d-dimensional anti-de Sitter space

Braneworld in f(r) gravity and critical gravity

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 19 Jul 2001

Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions

Dirac equation for dummies or theory of elasticity for the seriously advanced

Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama

Quantum Field Theory

Flato Fronsdal theorem for higher-order singletons

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

11 Spinor solutions and CPT

1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 21 May 1996

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ

Quantum Physics 2006/07

STOCHASTIC QUANTIZATION AND HOLOGRAPHY

Physics 582, Problem Set 1 Solutions

Topological DBI actions and nonlinear instantons

Physics 217 Solution Set #3 Fall 2016

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 5 Nov 2003

arxiv:hep-th/ v3 24 Apr 2007

Maxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density

PAPER 51 ADVANCED QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

Scalar Field Theory in the AdS/CFT Correspondence Revisited

Ginsparg-Wilson Fermions and the Chiral Gross-Neveu Model

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 16 Jun 2005

Comment on Solutions of the Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau equation for a pseudoscalar potential step in (1+1) dimensions

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 19 Jul 2003

Appendix A Notational Conventions

Thick Brane World. Seyen Kouwn Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute Korea

8.821 String Theory Fall 2008

Spinors in Curved Space

The l.h.s. of this equation is again a commutator of covariant derivatives, so we find. Deriving this once more we find

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

Week 3: Renormalizable lagrangians and the Standard model lagrangian 1 Reading material from the books

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 28 Jan 1999

Lecturer: Bengt E W Nilsson

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 16 Aug 2001

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 6 Jan 2004

Dynamical Domain Wall and Localization

Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 31 Jan 2006

arxiv:hep-th/ v2 4 Jan 2005

New Geometric Formalism for Gravity Equation in Empty Space

Abstract. I insert a few omitted expressions and correct detected misprints in my book [1].

ds/cft Contents Lecturer: Prof. Juan Maldacena Transcriber: Alexander Chen August 7, Lecture Lecture 2 5

Transcription:

Massive Spinors and ds/cft Correspondence Farhang Loran arxiv:hep-th/00135v3 16 Jun 00 Department of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology IUT) Isfahan, Iran, Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics IPM) P. O. Box: 19395-5531, Tehran, Iran. Abstract Using the map between free massless spinors on d+1 dimensional Minkowski spacetime and free massive spinors on ds d+1, we obtain the boundary term that should be added to the standard Dirac action for spinors in the ds/cft correspondence. It is shown that this map can be extended only to theories with vertex ψψ) but arbitrary d 1. In the case of scalar field theories such an extension can be made only for d,3,5 with vertices φ 6, φ and φ 3 respectively. e-mail: loran@cc.iut.ac.ir

1 Introduction It is known that the correct action for spinors in AdS d+1 /CFT d correspondence is the sum of the standard Dirac action, S Σ d d+1 x ψx) D m) ψx), 1) and some boundary term [1,, 3]. Specially in [1], Henneaux has shown that the boundary term can be determined by the stationary conditions on the solutions of Dirac equation with a definite asymptotic behavior. In those papers, the Euclidean AdS space is considered as the domain t > 0 with metric, ds 1 t ηµν dx µ dx ν, ) where x 0 t and η µν +, +,, +). It is also shown that the boundary term gives the action for spinors on the boundary with expected conformal weight in AdS/CFT correspondence. Since, ds d+1 space can be also described as the domain t > 0 with metric ) in which η µν +,,, ), it is reasonable to consider similar boundary terms in ds/cft correspondence. Recently we showed that massless scalar fields on d + 1 dimensional Minkowski spacetime are dual to scalar fields on ds d+1 with mass m d 1 []. In fact, if φ x, t) is the solution of Klein-Gordon equation in d + 1 dimensional Minkowski spacetime M d+1, η µν µ ν φt, x) 0, 3) then Φ x, t) t d 1 φ x, t) is a massive scalar on ds d+1, satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation, t t + 1 d)t t t + d 1 ) Φ x, t) 0 ) Using this map we obtained the action of the dual CFT on the boundary of ds space given in [7] by inserting the solution of the Klein-Gordon equation in M d+1 in terms of the initial data given on the hypersurface t 0 into the action of massless scalars on M d+1 and identifying the initial data with the CFT fields. The same result was obtained by mapping massless scalars from Euclidean space to Euclidean AdS. In M d+1, solutions of Dirac equation are solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation. Therefore, one can obtain some information about spinors and the ds/cft correspondence by mapping massless spinors from d + 1 dimensional Minkowski Euclidean) spacetime to de Sitter Euclidean AdS) space. As is mentioned in [], one can use the relation between massless fields in Minkowski Euclidean) spacetime and massive fields in ds Euclidean AdS) space to prove the holographic principle for the domain t 0 of Minkowski Euclidean) spacetime in the case

of massless fields. In the case of Minkowski spacetime a covariant description of the holographic principle can be given by considering a covariant boundary instead of the hypersurface t 0 which here is the space-like boundary of the domain t 0 [5]. Similar ideas are considered in ref.[6] where the relation between massive and massless scalar fields in Minkowski spacetime and on anti-)de Sitter space, one dimension lower, is studied. The organization of paper is as follows. In section, we give the solution of Dirac equation for massless spinors in the domain t 0 of Minkowski spacetime in terms of the initial data given on the boundary t 0. Specially we show that by adding a suitable boundary term to the standard Dirac action for spinors, not only the Hermitian condition of the action can be satisfied but one can also obtain the Dirac equation without imposing any condition on fields living on the boundary. Finally we will consider this unique boundary term as the action of CFT on the boundary. In section 3, we show that the most general solution of Dirac equation on ds Euclidean AdS) space spinors with arbitrary mass) can be given in terms of massless spinors in Minkowski spacetime with the same dimensionality. Finally we show that the map between fields in Minkowski spacetime and ds space can be extended to field theories with vertex ψψ) but arbitrary d 1 in the case of spinors. For scalar field theories this extension is applicable only in d, 3, 5 and for theories with vertices φ 6, φ and φ 3 respectively. We close the paper with a brief summary of results. There is also an appendix in which we have given some details about the general solution of Dirac equation for massless spinors in M d+1. These details are considerable since they show the agreement of our results with those of ds/cft in the case of scalar fields reported in [, 7]. In addition they make the connection of our results with previous attempts on ds/cft in the case of spinors [1,, 3]. Massless Fermions on M d+1 The Dirac equation for massless fermions, iγ µ µ ψt, x) 0 has solutions, ψ x, t) d d k ψ± k)e i k. x e ±iωt, 5) where, ) ±ωγ 0 + γ i ki ψ± k) 0, ω k. 6) γ 0 and γ i s are Dirac matrices satisfying the anti-commutation relation {γ µ, γ ν } η µν, in which η µν +,,, ). One can show that ψ + ±γ 0 ψ, therefore a general solution, ψ x, t) of the Dirac equation can be decomposed as ψ x, t) ψ 1) x, t) + ψ ) x, t), where ψ 1) x, t) d d k e iωt + γ 0 e iωt) ψ1) k)e i k. x, ψ ) x, t) d d k e iωt γ 0 e iωt) ψ) k)e i k. x. 7)

If one decomposes ψ a) k) as ψ a) ψ a) + + ψ a), a 1,, where, ψ a) + 1 + γ0 ψ a), ψa) 1 γ0 ψ a), 8) and using Eq.7) one can show that the initial data ψ 0 x) ψ x, 0) only determines ) and ψ : ψ 1) + k) d d xe i k. x ψ 0 + x), ψ) k) d d xe i k. x ψ0 x), 9) ψ 1) + where ψ ± 0 x) 1±γ0 ψ 0 x). Defining, χ + x) d d ke i k. x ψ1) k), χ x) d d ke i k. x ψ) + k), 10) and using Eq.9), one can determine ψ a) x, t) in terms of fields ψ ± 0 x) and χ ± x) living on the hypersurface t 0, as follows: ψ a) x, t) d d kd d y e iωt ± γ 0 e iωt) ψ 0 ± y) + χ± y) ) e i k. x y) Since γ 0 ψ ± 0 x) ±ψ ± 0 x), and γ 0 χ ± χ ±, one can decompose ψ x, t) ψ 1) x, t) + ψ ) x, t) as eigenvectors of γ 0, say ψ ± γ 0 ψ ± ±ψ ± ), as follows, ψ x, t) ψ + x, t) + ψ x, t) ψ + x, t) d d kd d y [ e iωt + γ 0 e iωt) ψ 0 + y) + e iωt γ 0 e iωt) χ y) ] e i k. x y) ψ x, t) d d kd d y [ e iωt γ 0 e iωt) ψ0 y) + e iωt + γ 0 e iωt) χ + y) ] e i k. x y) 1) As is shown in the appendix, χ ± can be determined in terms of ψ ± 0 x). Dirac equation can be obtained from the Dirac action for spinors, S i Σ 11) ψ ψ. 13) if one assume that Dirac fields vanish on the boundary. This assumption is also necessary for Lagrangian density i ψ ψ to be Hermitian. If one rewrite the action as, S D i Σ + ψ ψ. 1) then the Lagrangian density is Hermitian with no condition on fields on the boundary. In order to obtain Dirac equation, one can also add the following boundary term to the action, S b Σ ψ x)γ µ ψ x)n µ, 15) in which n µ is the unit vector perpendicular to boundary. This term cancels the contribution from the variation of fields on the boundary to δs. Therefore δs 0 gives the Dirac equation with no preassumption about fields on the boundary.

Now assume that boundary is the hypesurface t 0 and insert ψ x, t) the solution of the Dirac equation into the action S D + S b. S D vanishes by construction and, S b d d x ψ x)γ 0 ψ x). 16) Using the identity, ψ x) d d k d d ye i k. x y) ψ y), 17) after some calculations, S b 16) can be given as follows, S b Const. d d yd d z ψ y)γ 0 ψ z)f y z), 18) where F x) d d ke i k. x. F x) is simply equal to δ d x). A representation of the Dirac delta function appropriate for our purposes can be obtained by noting that F x) FR. x) for any rotation R SOd) and Fs x) s d F x) for any s > 0. Consequently, x. F x) r Fr) d F x), r where r x. Therefore F x) Const. x d. Inserting F y z) into S b, one finally obtains, S b Const. d d yd d z ψ z)γ 0 ψ y) y z d 19) 3 Spinors on ds d+1 In the description of ds d+1 as the domain t > 0 with metric ds t dt d x ), the Klein-Gordon equation for massive scalar fields is, t t x) + 1 d)t t + m ) φ 0. 0) If one write the above equation in the following form, t t x) + 1 d)t t + m ) ψ tγ µ ν + αγ 0 + ζ ) tγ ν ν + βγ 0 + ξ ) ψ, 1) where ψ is a spinor field, then one verify that β 1 + α 1 d, ξ ζ 0, m d 1. ) Therefor, for fields with mass m d 1, one can rewrite the Klein-Gordon equation 0), as tγ µ ν + 1 d ) γ0 ψ 0. 3) As we observed in Eqs.3) and ), massive scalar fields on ds d+1 with mass m d 1 are related to massless fields on M d+1. It is easy to verify that if ψ is a solution of Dirac

equation for massless spinors in M d+1 then Ψ t d 1 ψ is a solutions of Eq.3). If one rewrite Eq.3) in terms of the Dirac operator in ds d+1, D t d γ0, one obtains, D + 1 γ0 ) Ψ 0. ) Using the general solution of massless spinors in M d+1 Eq.1) one verifies that Ψ ± t d 1 ψ ± are massive spinors in ds d+1 with mass m ± 1 respectively. In general, one can show that the most general solution of Dirac equation for spinors with mass m, D m)ψ 0, can be given in terms of ψ ±, given in 1), as follows: Ψ t d m ψ + t d +m ψ +. 5) In words, all massive spinors in ds d+1 space can be considered as images of massless spinors in M d+1. The extension of this result to massive spinors in Euclidean AdS d+1 and massless spinors in d + 1 dimensional Euclidean space is straightforward. By construction, the hypersurface t 0 in M d+1 is isomorphic to the boundary of ds d+1. If one identifies the CFT fields on the boundary of ds d+1 with initial data ψ 0 and χ on the hypersurface of M d+1, then one can consider the action S b given in Eq.19) as the action of CFT on the boundary of ds d+1. The map ψ + Ψ + t d +m ψ + can be used to find the Minkowski dual of certain fermionic vertices on ds space. Consider a vertex V Ψ + Ψ + ) g Ψ + Ψ + ) n in ds space where n is some integer to be determined. The Dirac equation is D m)ψ + g Ψ n Ψ n 1, 6) in which g is the coupling constant in ds space. Rewriting the above equation in terms of massless spinor ψ +, one obtains, ψ + gt) ψ n +ψ n 1 +, 7) where, gt) gt d +m+1) t n 1) d +m), 8) is the coupling in the Minkowski spacetime. To obtain the above relation we have used the identity, D m)ψ + t d +m+1 ψ +. The Requirement that gt) is constant imposes the following identity: n 1 + 1 d + m, n N 9) Therefore, m d 1 and n. One can verify that the field theory with n vertex is renormalizable for d 1. To study the differences between scalars and spinors in the map M d+1 ds d+1, it is useful to search for those scalar field vertices that could be mapped from Minkowski

spacetime to ds space. As we explained in section 1, massless scalar fields in M d+1 can be only mapped to massive scalar fields in ds d+1 with mass m d 1. Using the identity, ) t t + 1 d)t t t + d 1 Φ x, t) t d 1 + t ) φ, 30) in which Φ t d 1 φ, and considering a vertex V φ) φñ, one can show that ñ + d 1. 31) Since ñ is an integer, the above identity can be satisfied only for special values of d: d {, 3, 5}. The corresponding value for ñ are 6,, 3. All such theories are renormalizable. Summary Studying the map between massless fields in d + 1 dimensional Minkowski spacetime M d+1 ) and massive fields on de Sitter space ds d+1, we found that ψ ±, the massless scalars in M d+1 which are eigenvectors of γ 0 with eigenvalues ±1 can be mapped to massive spinors in ds d+1 with mass, m 1 respectively. We found that the conformal weight of dual spinors on the boundary of ds d+1 space is d and the CFT action is ψ z)γ 0 ψ y) S b Const. Σ y z d, 3) which is in agreement with the action of scalar fields obtained in ds/cft correspondence. We observed that massive spinors on ds d+1 with arbitrary mass can be given in terms of ψ ± as follows, Ψ t d m ψ + t d +m ψ +. 33) Using the above identity, we found that the map between free field theories can be extended to theories with vertex ψψ) for spinors with mass m d 1 for arbitrary d 1. In the case of scalar fields similar considerations showed that only for d, 3, 5, the φ 6, φ and φ 3 theories can be mapped from M d+1 to ds d+1 respectively. Appendix In this appendix we obtain the field χ x) in terms of ψ 0 x). We also give the action S b in terms of ψ 0 and ψ 0. The notation we use here for the Fourier components of fields differs slightly with those used in the main body of the paper. From Eq.11) one can show that, i ψ ± x, 0) d d yd d k ωχ ± y)e i k. x y) d d k ω χ ± k)e i k. x. 3)

On the other hand, i ψ iγ 0 γ i i ψ. Thus, using the identity ψ ± 0 x) d d ke i k. x ψ± 0 k), one verifies that which results in the following identity: d d k ω χ ± k)e i k. x d d yd d k γ 0 γ i k i e i k. x ψ± 0 k), 35) χ ± k) γ 0 γ ik i ω ψ ± k) Using the above identity one can also show that γ ik i ω ψ ± k) 36) ψ ± k) γ ik i ω χ± k) 37) To action S b can be given in terms of ψ 0 and ψ 0 as follows see Eq.16)): S b d d x ψ x)γ 0 ψ x) d d x ψ+ x)ψ + x) ψ x)ψ x) ) d d k ψ+ k) ψ+ k) ψ k)ψ ) k) d d k ψ+ k) ψ+ k) + d d k χ k) χ k) 38) where to obtain the last equality we have used Eq.37). Using the Fourier transformation one obtains, d d k ψ+ k) ψ+ k) Const. d d yd d z ψ + y)ψ + z) d d k e i k. y z) d d yd d z ψ + y)ψ + z) y z d. 39) The last equality can be obtained by considering the variation of the integrand under rescaling and rotation. Furthermore, d d k χ k) χ k) d d 1 k ψ ω k) ψ k) d d yd d z ψ y) ψ z) d d 1 k Const. ω ei k. y z) ψ d d yd d y) z ψ z) d. 0) y z This result is in agreement with those obtained in refs.[, 7] for scalar fields.

References [1] M. Henneaux, Boundary terms in the AdS/CFT correspondence for spinor fields, hep-th/990137. [] W. Mück and K. S. Viswanathan, Phys.Rev. D58 1998) 106006, hep-th/980515. [3] M. Henningson and K. Sfetsos, Phys.Lett. B31 1998) 63-68, hep-th/980351; G. E. Arutyunov and S. A. Frolov, Nucl.Phys. B5 1999) 576-589,hep-th/980616. [] F. Loran, ds/cft Correspondence from a Holographic Description of Massless Scalar Fields in Minkowski Space-Time, hep-th/00067. [5] R. Bousso, Rev. Mod. Phys. 7 00) 85. [6] J. de Boer and S. N. Solodukhin, Nucl.Phys. B665 003) 55-593, hep-th/0303006. [7] A. Strominger, JHEP 0110 001) 03, hep-th/0106113.