Application of national regulations for metallic materials recycling from the decommissioning of an Italian nuclear facility.

Similar documents
List of Legislative Regulations Dealing with Nuclear Energy and Ionizing Radiation and Related Documents

Active concentration for material not requiring radiological regulation

2016 No. 410 (W. 128) WATER, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Water Supply (Water Quality) (Amendment) Regulations 2016

Assessment of Radioactivity Inventory a key parameter in the clearance for recycling process

English - Or. English NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY STEERING COMMITTEE FOR NUCLEAR ENERGY

Clearance Monitoring. Chris Goddard.

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RADIOLOGICAL CHRACTERIZATION FOR REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING. China Nuclear Power Engineering Co. Ltd, Beijing , China

RPR 29 CYCLOTRON RADIOCHEMISTRY LABORATORY

International Conference on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Gabriele Hampel 1, Uwe Klaus 2

8 th International Workshop on Radiation Safety at Synchrotron Radiation Sources

Radionuclides in food and water. Dr. Ljudmila Benedik

O R D E R OF THE HEAD OF THE STATE NUCLEAR POWER SAFETY INSPECTORATE

Radioactive Waste Management For The Ignitor Nuclear Fusion Experiment

Radiological Protection Principles concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials

Final Report (Revision 2): Guideline for the clearance of materials during the decommissioning of a nuclear facility

DOE S RADIOLOGICAL TRACEABILITY PROGRAM FOR RADIOANALYTICAL MEASUREMENTS: WORK IN PROGRESS

RULEBOOK ON THE MANAGEMENT, COLLECTION, STORAGE, CONDITIONING, TRANSPORT AND DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE

WASTE CHARACTERIZATION FOR RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE EVAPORATORS AT ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY - WEST

SOUTHERN NUCLEAR COMPANY VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 NRC DOCKET NOS AND

SLAC Metal Clearance Program and Progress

Characterization Survey Techniques and Some Practical Feedback

Pete Burgess, Nuvia Limited. Clearance and exemption

Laboratory ID. Laboratory Name. Analyst(s) Auditor. Date(s) of Audit. Type of Audit Initial Biennial Special ELCP TNI/NELAP.

Sampling based on Bayesian statistics and scaling factors

STUDIES ON THE AEROSOL RADIOACTIVITY LEVEL AND AIR QUALITY AROUND NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE AREA

GRAPHITE GAS REACTORS SLA1 & SLA2 : FROM SAMPLING STRATEGY TO WORKING CONDITIONS

Radiological Characterization of Buildings at the Ranstad Uranium Works

INDUSTRY GUIDANCE. REACH for catalysts. 1. Introduction. 2. Fresh catalysts. 3. Active catalysts

Radioactive Waste Management

Characterization of radioactive waste and packages

Categorization of nuclear materials, radioactive sources and radioactive wastes

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Title: Assessment of activity inventories in Swedish LWRs at time of decommissioning

KEYWORDS: Curie; radium; legacy; contamination; gamma spectrometry; radium-226; thorium- 232.

SLOVENIAN ALARM AND MONITORING NETWORKS

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Agreement States. Transportation of Radioactive Materials NRC Course H-308

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Report 1: National waste class definitions versus the IAEA s proposed waste classes

NEW DEVELOPMENTS OF AUTORADIOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE ALPHA AND BETA MEASUREMENTS FOR DECOMMISSIONING FACILITIES

RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION Laboratory Procedures

Radioactivity of the Treated Topaz

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Characterisation of radioactive waste from nuclear decommissioning. Peter Ivanov. Acoustics & Ionising Radiation National Physical Laboratory, UK

The Decommissioning of Accelerator Installations, a Challenge for Radiation Protection in the 21 st Century

5DGLDWLRQ3URWHFWLRQ 35$&7,&$/86(2)7+(&21&(376. Guidance on General Clearance Levels for Practices 2)&/($5$1&($1'(;(037,21± 3$57,

Calculation of dose rate, decay heat and criticality for verifying compliance with transport limits for steel packages

RADIATION PROTECTION NO 157

ISO Water quality Strontium 90 and strontium 89 Test methods using liquid scintillation counting or proportional counting

Clearance and Exemption Working Group. c/o Natalie Buckley Building F6.2 AWE plc Aldermaston Reading RG7 4PR United Kingdom

Clearance and Radiological Sentencing: Principles, Process and Practices

Regulations concerning protection of Bjørnøya Nature Reserve in Svalbard

RADIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION ACTIVITIES DURING THE PARTIAL DISMANTLING OF THE IRT SOFIA RESEARCH REACTOR FACILITIES

Journal of Radiation Protection and Research

Monitoring of Ionizing Radiations facilities Experience and challenge

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION

Procedures for the Release of Sites

PROPOSED POLICY LETTER: CARRIAGE OF CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED SHALE GAS EXTRACTION WASTE WATER IN BULK

Douglas Millican Chief Executive Scottish Water Castle House 6 Castle Drive DUNFERMLINE KY11 8GG Our Reference: 9 January 2014

Radioactive Waste Characterization and Management Post-Assessment Answer Key Page 1 of 7

Lower Bound of Optimization for the Public Considering Dose Distribution of Radiation due to Natural Background Radiation

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona USA. Reportable Nuclide Criteria for ORNL Radioactive Waste Management Activities 13005

Residual activity (contamination) Radiation exposure levels

SURVEILLANCE OF RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES FROM THE CENTRE OF ISOTOPES OF CUBA

ISO Water quality Measurement of polonium 210 activity concentration in water by alpha spectrometry

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Gross Alpha-Gross Beta Analysis in Water by Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC)

IAEA-TECDOC Strategy and Methodology for Radioactive Waste Characterization

SOME ASPECTS OF COOLANT CHEMISTRY SAFETY REGULATIONS AT RUSSIA S NPP WITH FAST REACTORS

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Measurement of radioactivity in the environment Soil Part 5: Measurement of strontium 90

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.54 (Draft was issued as DG-1076) SERVICE LEVEL I, II, AND III PROTECTIVE COATINGS APPLIED TO NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Verification measurements of alpha active waste

Answers to questions raised by Gerhard Schmidt concerning the planning process for a Danish nuclear waste repository

Sensitivity of the IRD whole-body counter for in vivo measurements in the case of accidental intakes

Tritiated Waste Management Opportunities Based On The Reduction Of Tritium Activity And Outgassing 15607

Verification measurements of alpha active waste

THE USE OF IONISING RADIATION IN THE MANUFACTURE OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Clearance and Radiological Sentencing: Principles, Processes and Practices for Use by the Nuclear Industry. A Nuclear Industry Code of Practice

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona USA. Screening and Spectral Summing of LANL Empty Waste Drums 13226

SURFACE CONTAMINATION CRITERIA FOR EQUIPMENT CONTAMINATED WITH NORM

8 th International Summer School 2016, JRC Ispra on Nuclear Decommissioning and Waste Management

NORM Services Provided by Institute for Energy Technology. Tore Ramsøy & Rajdeep Sidhu

Radiological Traceability Program (RTP) Radiological and Environmental Science Laboratory (RESL) Svetlana Nour Kenneth Inn Jerry LaRosa Jackie Mann

Geostatistical characterisation of contaminated metals: methodology and illustrations

ISO Radiological protection Sealed radioactive sources General requirements and classification

Radiation Safety Protection for Callahan Eye Hospital (OHS_RS502)

Higher National Unit specification. General information for centres. Unit code: F6JK 35

Derogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code

Materials and waste characterisation Dealing with difficult waste

Radioactive Sources in Chemical Laboratories

Specific Accreditation Criteria Calibration ISO/IEC Annex. Ionising radiation measurements

POLICY ISSUE (INFORMATION)

SEQUENTIAL DETERMINATION OF AMERICIUM, PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM IN LIQUID EFFLUENTS FROM NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Revision checklist. Step Learning outcome Had a look Nearly there Nailed it!

A. Identify the highly penetrating radioactive emission that exposed the photographic plates.

Food Defense During a Radiological Emergency

Ionizing radiation Radiological risk in test laboratories

Methods for radiological characterisation

Shake-and-Shoot : A Rapid Solvent Extraction Process for PCBs and TPH 11375

Transcription:

Application of national regulations for metallic materials recycling from the decommissioning of an Italian nuclear facility. Giovanni Varasano *, Leonardo Baldassarre*, Edoardo Petagna*. SOGIN Spa, ITREC Trisaia, Rotondella (MT) - Italy Studsvik, Nyköping, Sweden, April 8th-10th 2014

1. INTRODUCTION The start of decommissioning of Italian nuclear facilities requires proper management of clearance for large volumes of metallic materials. This paper describes the Italian current regulatory framework according to standard regulatory system for materials unconditional removal feasibility from nuclear facilities, with particular reference to the recycling of metals, carrying two examples: the first relating to removal of a steel tank located in not Classified Zone but within the perimeter of the nuclear installation, the second relating to removal of metals from the Controlled Zone. 2

1. INTRODUCTION The definition of the Levels of Removal, whether General or Specific, ensures the nonrelevance of radiological materials removed without additional controls. The Italian legislation on radiation protection provides that the removal of materials from installations subject to authorization is exposed to special requirements included in authorization measures. They expect that clearance levels take into account the legislations, recommendations, and technical guidelines provided by the European Union. The current prescriptive body requires compliance with technical managerial requirements, issued by the Authority Control enclosed in ministerial authorization, which show the levels of surface concentration of activity and specific activity determined for metallic materials unconditional removal from nuclear facilities. 3

2. ITALIAN AND EUROPEAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The version of the Basic Safety Standards suggests the levels of exemption (Exemption Level), which are defined in a more restrictive sense in national law. The unconditional clearance levels (Clearance Level) are also suggested in the publications Radiation Protection (RP) in particular, the RP 89 offers specific levels of removal (Specific Clearance Level) for metals. The RP 122 Part I to par. 5.1 states that the materials removed should not be subjected to further examination, otherwise it would contradict the principle of Unconditional Removal that prescribes instead the release of materials from the regulatory system (Clearance = release from regulatory requirements). The Italian legislation on radioprotection (Article 154 paragraph 3 bis of Legislative Decree 230/95 and subsequent modifications and additions) states that "... the removal of installations subject to authorization... of materials containing radioactive substances intended to be disposed of, recycled or reused... is subject to specific requirements to be included in authorization measures... The clearance levels... take into account the guidelines, recommendations, and technical guidance provided by the European Union" 4

2. ITALIAN AND EUROPEAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The Operating License of ITREC Trisaia, issued by the Ministry of Economic Development pursuant to art. 50 of Legislative Decree 230/95, and subsequent modifications and additions, requires compliance with technical and management requirements - issued by the Control Authority (ISPRA - Institute for Environmental Protection and Research), in particular the management prescription 2.9 indicates the surface and mass concentration levels established for the unconditional removal of solids by ITREC facility. Over the last few years the concept of "materials from nuclear installations" has been extended by the Competent Authorities not only to those materials from the areas classified pursuant to Legislative Decree 230/95 and subsequent modifications and additions, but also to those originating in areas free of radiological restrictions and inside the nuclear facility s perimeter. For the material from nuclear facility not classified areas the Competent Authority authorized the use of a procedure ("criterion of the Three Zeros") that allows you to verify the removability of the materials based on the concept of "Critical Level " 5

3.STRATEGIES AND POLICIES FOR UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF METALLIC MATERIALS FROM ITREC FACILITY The unconditional removal of metals from ITREC Controlled Area is authorized subject authorized verifying the compliance with the levels of the radioactivity present in Table1 Radionuclide (i) C ( li ) Metallic materials Surface (Bq/cm 2 ) Mass (Bq/g) 3 H 10.000 1 55 Fe 1.000 1 60 Co 1 1 59 Ni 1.000 1 63 Ni 1.000 1 90 Sr 1 1 134 Cs 1 0,1 137 Cs 10 1 152 Eu 1 1 154 Eu 1 1 emitters (*) 0,1 0,1 (*) As U and/or Th

3.STRATEGIES AND POLICIES FOR UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE OF METALLIC MATERIALS FROM ITREC FACILITY The condition to be met in the case of multiple radionuclides is the following: i C i C li < 1 To verify the condition above, considerating the material to be analyzed, is established a scaling factor set between easy measureable (Easy To Measure ETM like 137Cs, 134Cs, 60Co, 152Eu, 154Eu e 60Co) and hardly measureable radionuclide (Hard To Measure HTM come 90Sr, 233U, 235U, 238U, 232Th, 3H, 55Fe, 59Ni e 63Ni): the definition of radionuclide s vector is object of study by Competent Authority.

Metallic materials from not Classified Zone For the purpose of metal unconditional release from not Classified Zone pursuant to Legislative Decree no. 230/95 and subsequent amendments, the Control Authority allows the verification of the absence of radioactivity is conducted through the criterion of the "three zero" [6]: 1. Historical: based on the operating history of the facility, there must be a guarantee that the areas and structures to be release have never been affected by contamination events or activation; 2. Logical - Plant designed: based on the location and function of the areas and structures linked to it, there must be a guarantee that they have never come into contact with contaminated fluids or subjected to neutron flows; 3. Instrumental: the absence, in the environmental matrix in areas and materials constituting the outbuildings, of artificial radioactivity, net environmental background, must be confirmed on the basis of radiometric measurements to be performed according to an appropriate characterization plan.

Metallic materials from not Classified Zone The verification of the instrumental criterion is conducted in accordance with the terms described in the UNI 11458:2012: it defines strategies for the measurement of low levels of radioactivity in solid materials from nuclear facility. For each batch of removable material is necessary to submit to the Authority for consideration a characterization plan able to demonstrate the fulfillment of the three criteria above.

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL METALLIC MATERIALS FROM CONTROLLED AREA The removal of metal parts is performed as indicated in the management regulation 2.9 on levels of surface and mass concentration established for the unconditional removal of metallic materials, with the approval of characterization plan containing scaling factors by Control Authority. The verification of condition Surface in Table 1 is being conducted on 100 % of the areas to be investigated. In particular, the determination of surface contamination of alpha emitters or beta / gamma emitters radionuclides is performed in terms of gross alpha, beta / gamma total using portable contamination monitor.

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL METALLIC MATERIALS FROM CONTROLLED AREA Not being able to discriminate the contribution of each radionuclide present in Table 1, is attributed all the activity measured to the radionuclide with the more restrictive release level among those present in Table 1. infact: i C i C li = C 1 C l1 + C 2 C l2 + + C n C ln < C 1 C min + C 2 C min + + C n C min = C tot C min where Cmin is the most restrictive among those present in Table 1 and Ctot is the total activity measured per unit area. If it appears that then it is certainly respected the formula C tot C min < 1 i C i C li < 1

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL METALLIC MATERIALS FROM CONTROLLED AREA The verification of condition Mass" recalled in Table 1 is tested on a statistically representative sample of the lot to be removed, using a system of high resolution gamma spectrometry. The representativeness of the sample is assured by compliance with the requirements defined in the UNI 11458:2012. In particular, consider the following assumptions: Probability of error of the first type( the material has a radioactivity which does not exceed the levels of removal, but it is not considered as such and is not removed ) = 0.05 ; Probability of error of the second type( the material has a radioactivity exceeding the levels of removal, but it is not considered as such and is removed ) b = 0.05 ; CLR (clearance levels ) of 0.1 Bq / g for 137 Cs and 60 Co ( more conservative value among those listed in Table 1) ; C0 (estimated value of residual activity in the material) considered 0.05 Bq / g for 137 Cs e 60 Co; s m standard deviation of the measure, conservatively assumed equal to 20 % of CLR. s s standard deviation of the spatial distribution of radioactivity considered equal to s m ;

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL N = (Z 1 α + Z 1 β ) 2 4 (p 0,5) 2 p = 1 2π σ e x 2 dx

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL METALLIC MATERIALS FROM NOT CLASSIFIED AREA During one of the preparatory activities to the decommissioning of ITREC facility, it was necessary to demolish a steel tank, formerly used for the storage of fuel oil used to feed the thermal power plant. For this tank, obviously located in not Classified Zone, although it is possible to exclude the presence of artificial radionuclides attributable to normal operations of the facility or previous accidents, however, was carried out the verification of removability based on the criterion of the "three zero" The Characterization Plan planned and submitted to the Control Authority concerned the instrumental activities that were conducted on the surface of the tank object of interest.

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL METALLIC MATERIALS FROM NOT CLASSIFIED AREA Figure 1: Fuel oil tank. Points of measurement of activity per unit of surface

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL METALLIC MATERIALS FROM NOT CLASSIFIED AREA The verification of the criteria "Historical" and " Logical- plant designed " is satisfied because the totality of the tank falls into not classified area : in this area is ruled out the presence of artificial radionuclides attributable to normal operations of the plant or previous accidents. For the verification of the criterion " Instrumental " has been implemented a program of sampling and measurement divided into the following phases: Make a measurement of contamination, " beta / gamma total " by means of portable monitor contamination with detection surface of 177 cm 2 and equipped with a gas flow proportional counter, in an average time of 10 s, near the tank used as background environmental reference execution of No. 16 measurements on the points indicated in figure 1, ( the number of measurements was calculated using the Noether s formula so making the sample statistically representative ) verification of criterion " instrumental" through the use of the statistical concept of "critical level" L C, defined as the minimum level usable for the detection of radioactivity

4. EXAMPLES OF METAL UNCONDITIONAL REMOVAL MATERIALI METALLICI PROVENIENTI DA ZONA NON CLASSIFICATA verification of criterion " instrumental" through the use of the statistical concept of "critical level" L C, defined as the minimum level usable for the detection of radioactivity The "critical level" is defined as L C L c = Z 1 α 2R b With Z 1-α = 1,645 (percentile of the normal distribution with 95% confidence level) and R b = average rate of the background count. The radiometric measurements performed to the structure to be characterized, net of background value, were compared with the critical level and the instrumental criterion was satisfied being such measures less than or equal to this value.

5.CONCLUSIONS This presentation shows how the Italian operator Sogin S.pA applies the national legislation for the purpose of unconditional removal of metal materials from nuclear facilities. The real challenge for the nuclear operator is the management of large amounts of waste materials arising from decommissioning activities. For this SOGIN S.p.A. considers of utmost importance the proper application of rules and regulations issued by the Control Authority, in order to allow the most effective decrease of radioactive waste amount produced during decommissioning activities.

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION