Application and verification of ECMWF products in Serbia

Similar documents
Application and verification of ECMWF products 2008

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products: 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2009

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2018

Application and verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2014

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia - July 2007

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Croatia

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2011

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2012

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2006

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2013

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Model Output Statistics (MOS)

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

JOINT WMO TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GLOBAL DATA PROCESSING AND FORECASTING SYSTEM AND NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION RESEARCH ACTIVITIES FOR 2007

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2017

Verification of ECMWF products at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

István Ihász, Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

The benefits and developments in ensemble wind forecasting

Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Austria

István Ihász, Máté Mile and Zoltán Üveges Hungarian Meteorological Service, Budapest, Hungary

ECMWF products to represent, quantify and communicate forecast uncertainty

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2015

STATISTICAL MODELS and VERIFICATION

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Agrometeorological activities in RHMSS

Experimental MOS Precipitation Type Guidance from the ECMWF Model

The Hungarian Meteorological Service has made

Agrometeorological services in Greece

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Five years of limited-area ensemble activities at ARPA-SIM: the COSMO-LEPS system

P3.1 Development of MOS Thunderstorm and Severe Thunderstorm Forecast Equations with Multiple Data Sources

Republic of Serbia Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia. Drought monitoring and forecasting in Serbia

Adaptation for global application of calibration and downscaling methods of medium range ensemble weather forecasts

Verification of different wind gust parametrizations Overview of verification results at MeteoSwiss in the year 2012

Allison Monarski, University of Maryland Masters Scholarly Paper, December 6, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

Seasonal Predictions for South Caucasus and Armenia

Developments towards multi-model based forecast product generation

Operations Portugal (second half of 2010)

Clustering Techniques and their applications at ECMWF

Verification of ECMWF products at the Finnish Meteorological Institute

Forecasting Extreme Events

LAMEPS activities at the Hungarian Meteorological Service. Hungarian Meteorological Service

Severe weather warnings at the Hungarian Meteorological Service: Developments and progress

Annual WWW Technical Progress Report. On the Global Data Processing and Forecasting System 2004 OMAN

República de Angola Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia e Geofísica SWFDP - PWS. Pretoria, 2013

ECMWF product development

Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback

Towards Operational Probabilistic Precipitation Forecast

International Desks: African Training Desk and Projects

NADM, NACEM, and Opportunities for Future Collaboration

Seasonal Forecast for the area of the east Mediterranean, Products and Perspectives

Application of Products from Numerical Models in Agrometeorological Forecasts and Climate Watch System

A study on the spread/error relationship of the COSMO-LEPS ensemble

Regional Climate Centre Network (RCC) in RA VI as a GFCS contribution

4.3.2 Configuration. 4.3 Ensemble Prediction System Introduction

Current best practice of uncertainty forecast for wind energy

Verification of precipitation forecasts by the DWD limited area model LME over Cyprus

Estimation of Forecat uncertainty with graphical products. Karyne Viard, Christian Viel, François Vinit, Jacques Richon, Nicole Girardot

QUANTITATIVE VERIFICATION STATISTICS OF WRF PREDICTIONS OVER THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION

Chile / Dirección Meteorológica de Chile (Chilean Weather Service)

Experiments of clustering for central European area specially in extreme weather situations. István Ihász. Hungarian Meteorological Service

Description of the case study

Recent ECMWF Developments

Regional Production, Quarterly report on the daily analyses and forecasts activities, and verification of the CHIMERE performances

Shaping future approaches to evaluating highimpact weather forecasts

Romanian Contribution in Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts Project

Spatial methods for assessing radar data assimilation performance at RHM: a framework

Ashraf S. Zakey The Egyptian Meteorological Autority

Forecasting summer convective activity over the Po Valley: insights from MAP D-PHASE

15 day VarEPS introduced at. 28 November 2006

At the start of the talk will be a trivia question. Be prepared to write your answer.

ECMWF 10 th workshop on Meteorological Operational Systems

Optimal combination of NWP Model Forecasts for AutoWARN

Observations needed for verification of additional forecast products

MAIN ATTRIBUTES OF THE PRECIPITATION PRODUCTS DEVELOPED BY THE HYDROLOGY SAF PROJECT RESULTS OF THE VALIDATION IN HUNGARY

DROUGHT MONITORING BULLETIN

SPECIAL PROJECT PROGRESS REPORT

Portugal. Instituto de Meteorologia

Calibration with MOS at DWD

Transcription:

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Serbia Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia 1. Summary of major highlights ECMWF products are operationally used in Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia from the beginning of 2003. Deterministic forecast products are received via RMDCN in GRIB and BUFR form for 10 days forecast at different horizontal resolutions and several domains. Products are represented using MetView and are available on local web site. In addition, forecasters consult ECMWF web site, priory for EPS products and monthly forecast. From September 2006 seasonal forecast products are also used. 2. Use and application of products ECMWF products are used for short-range forecast and for providing meteorological background for hail suppression activities, which is specialized part of Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia.Service uses BC products for running regional Eta model for 72 hours forecast.recently we have installed WRF-NMM nonhydrostatic model for short-range forecast (up to 48 hours) and we are doing efforts for adjusting and preparing ECMWF global fields as boundary conditions for future operational run.hydrometeorological Service of Serbia regularly issues monthly forecast for several places in Serbia. Statistical method by analogy is used together with EPS products from ECMWF.Completely new approach in our Service was implemented in interpretation of seasonal forecast. 2.1 Post-processing of model output 2.1.1 Statistical adaptation 2.1.2 Physical adaptation Only first steps were made in non-hydrostatic modelling. Regarding requirements that models have there are a lot of work in preparation and arrangement of input fields from ECMWF as well as the most suitable using of available finale products. 2.1.3 Derived fields 2.2 Use of products Some of ECMWF forecast products, like CAPE and EFI are widely used in every day work. Wind gusts and forecasted minimum and maximum daily temperature are especially important in forecast for road maintenance requirements.hydrometeorological Service of Serbia uses BUFR weather parameters for ten days forecast for central heating system and agro meteorological purposes.we developed criteria for automatic weather forecast also on BUFR weather parameters basis. These products are available on local intranet (Fig 1 and 2). 1

Fig. 1 2

Fig. 2 3. Verification of products 3.1 Objective verification 3.1.1 Direct ECMWF model output (both deterministic and EPS) The verification has been made for several locations, including Belgrade, which are of interest to our forecasters. Input forecast values for ECMWF were taken from 0.5 x0.5 grid. The 00UTC model run outputs have been verified using grid points closest to chosen synoptic stations. Verified local weather parameters Minimum temperature Tmin (minimum night time temperature between 18 and 06 UTC). Maximum temperature Tmax (maximum daytime temperature between 06 and 18 UTC). Precipitation occurrence R24 (accumulated precipitation between 06 and 06 UTC 0.3 mm/24h). Some results for Beograd (13274), Negotin (13295) and Zlatibor (13367) are presented. Negotin is situated in the eastern part of the country, whose temperature is very dependent on synoptic situation. Sometimes, this location is very difficult for forecasting. Zlatibor is a mountain station in southwestern Serbia. 3

Considering whole forecast range (from D+0 to D+9) in most of the cases Tmin forecast is more accurate than Tmax forecast (Fig 3a and 3b for Zlatibor) with very good results in summer. If we compare some stations, MAE is less then 2 C even for D+9 (Fig 4a for Negotin) in summer and systematic underestimation of minimum temperature is noticed for Belgrade, especially in spring (Fig 4b). For most locations underestimation of maximum temperature is in autumn (Fig 5a, Belgrade), and for Negotin during whole year (Fig 5b, summer). Fig. 3 a) b) Fig. 4 a) b) Fig. 5 a) b) 4

First steps in verification of precipitation occurrence have been made this year. Presented results show overestimation of precipitation occurrence, what was already known from forecasters' experience. This overestimation is biggest in autumn (Fig 6, Belgrade). The best results are gained for southwestern mountain region (Fig 7, Zlatibor). Heidke Skill Score is presented in Fig.8, it gives very good results in prediction of precipitation occurrence for first 4 days of forecast. Fig. 6 Fig. 7 Fig. 8 From 2005 EPS GRIB products and statistical method are used for corrections in method by analogy, traditionally used for monthly forecast. As in 2005, plots of MAE (Fig 9) and ME (Fig 10) of mean daily temperature for Belgrade show noticeable improving in reliability of monthly forecast for 2006. 5

Fig. 9 Fig. 10 RHMS of Serbia made first steps in using of the ECMWF Seasonal Forecast products (System2) from September 2006. We are using Web available products spatial maps of model probabilities stratified by terciles for T2m temperature and precipitation and climagram for southeast Europe for preparation of first seasonal forecast bulletins for final users (Belgrade remote heating system, Ministry of Agriculture). At the end of 2006 regular dissemination of the monthly mean anomalies of minimum and maximum temperature and for precipitation is activated.there is no systematic verification of seasonal forecast yet. 3.1.2 ECMWF model output compared to other NWP models 3.1.3 Post-processed products 3.1.4 End products delivered to users 3.2 Subjective verification There is no subjective verification. 3.2.1 Subjective scores (including evaluation of confidence indices when available) 3.2.2 Synoptic studies 6