Homework 3. 1 Coherent Control [22 pts.] 1.1 State vector vs Bloch vector [8 pts.]

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

Mesoscopic field state superpositions in Cavity QED: present status and perspectives

FIG. 16: A Mach Zehnder interferometer consists of two symmetric beam splitters BS1 and BS2

Light as a Transverse Wave.

Applied Physics 150a: Homework #3

Laser Cooling and Trapping of Atoms

4. Two-level systems. 4.1 Generalities

Path Entanglement. Liat Dovrat. Quantum Optics Seminar

Notes on x-ray scattering - M. Le Tacon, B. Keimer (06/2015)

in Electromagnetics Numerical Method Introduction to Electromagnetics I Lecturer: Charusluk Viphavakit, PhD

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/23/05

Plasmonics: elementary excitation of a plasma (gas of free charges) nano-scale optics done with plasmons at metal interfaces

Homework 1. Nano Optics, Fall Semester 2017 Photonics Laboratory, ETH Zürich

Electromagnetically Induced Flows in Water

Homework 1. Nano Optics, Fall Semester 2018 Photonics Laboratory, ETH Zürich

Typical anisotropies introduced by geometry (not everything is spherically symmetric) temperature gradients magnetic fields electrical fields

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics 8.03 Fall 2004 Final Exam Thursday, December 16, 2004

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

Neutron interferometry. Hofer Joachim

Ph 12b. Homework Assignment No. 3 Due: 5pm, Thursday, 28 January 2010

Optical Lattices. Chapter Polarization

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture # 22

C. Show your answer in part B agrees with your answer in part A in the limit that the constant c 0.

Grading. Class attendance: (1 point/class) x 9 classes = 9 points maximum Homework: (10 points/hw) x 3 HW = 30 points maximum

Chapter 2 Physical Principle of Optical Tweezers

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 11 Nov 2014

Quantum Optics exam. M2 LOM and Nanophysique. 28 November 2017

Landau-Zener Transition

Physics 218 Practice Final Exam

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2)

B2.III Revision notes: quantum physics

Any pure quantum state ψ (qubit) of this system can be written, up to a phase, as a superposition (linear combination of the states)

Department of Physics PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION 2014 Part II. Long Questions

Non-linear Optics II (Modulators & Harmonic Generation)

Chapter 13: Oscillatory Motions

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department

Lecture 9: Introduction to Diffraction of Light

Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Georgia

arxiv: v2 [physics.optics] 10 Oct 2018

Supplementary Information

Interaction X-rays - Matter

Orientational Kerr effect in liquid crystal ferroelectrics and modulation of partially polarized light

I. Rayleigh Scattering. EE Lecture 4. II. Dipole interpretation

PH 451/551 Quantum Mechanics Capstone Winter 201x

Towards quantum metrology with N00N states enabled by ensemble-cavity interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Phys 622 Problems Chapter 5

9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms

b) Derive the charge-current continuity equation for free charge-density (, ) and free current-density (, ) from Maxwell s microscopic equations.

NANOSCALE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

Coherent states, beam splitters and photons

SECOND PUBLIC EXAMINATION. Honour School of Physics Part C: 4 Year Course. Honour School of Physics and Philosophy Part C

PHYS 508 (2015-1) Final Exam January 27, Wednesday.

Quantum optics of many-body systems

Oscillatory Motion and Wave Motion

Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. ECE318S Fundamentals of Optics. Final Exam. April 16, 2007.

Lecture 11: Introduction to diffraction of light

1.6. Quantum mechanical description of the hydrogen atom

Light in Matter (Hecht Ch. 3)

7 Three-level systems

Qualifying Exam. Aug Part II. Please use blank paper for your work do not write on problems sheets!

Matter wave interferometry beyond classical limits

Final Exam Tuesday, May 8, 2012 Starting at 8:30 a.m., Hoyt Hall Duration: 2h 30m

Control of dispersion effects for resonant ultrashort pulses M. A. Bouchene, J. C. Delagnes

Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation. References:

The Stern-Gerlach experiment and spin

1 Mach-Zehder Interferometer 1. 2 Elitzur-Vaidman Bombs 6

Nonlinear Optics (NLO)

Quantum Mechanics II Lecture 11 ( David Ritchie

Lecture 19 Optical MEMS (1)

4: birefringence and phase matching

Motion and motional qubit

2.3 Oscillation. The harmonic oscillator equation is the differential equation. d 2 y dt 2 r y (r > 0). Its solutions have the form

Luz e Átomos. como ferramentas para Informação. Quântica. Quântica Ótica. Marcelo Martinelli. Lab. de Manipulação Coerente de Átomos e Luz

Atom interferometry. Quantum metrology and fundamental constants. Laboratoire de physique des lasers, CNRS-Université Paris Nord

David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

Optical and Photonic Glasses. Lecture 37. Non-Linear Optical Glasses I - Fundamentals. Professor Rui Almeida

Photon Physics: EIT and Slow light

16.1. PROBLEM SET I 197

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

A few principles of classical and quantum mechanics

Electromagnetism Phys 3230 Exam 2005

Lecture 3: Optical Properties of Insulators, Semiconductors, and Metals. 5 nm

Chapter 9. Reflection, Refraction and Polarization

1 Recall what is Spin

Lecture 11, May 11, 2017

Optical manipulation of valley pseudospin

Physics 106a/196a Problem Set 7 Due Dec 2, 2005

Collège de France abroad Lectures Quantum information with real or artificial atoms and photons in cavities

The interaction of light and matter

Nanoscale antennas. Said R. K. Rodriguez 24/04/2018

Non-stationary States and Electric Dipole Transitions

Polarization Optics. N. Fressengeas

Physics 221. Exam III Spring f S While the cylinder is rolling up, the frictional force is and the cylinder is rotating

Lecture #6 NMR in Hilbert Space

Waves & Oscillations

APPLIED OPTICS POLARIZATION

Precision Interferometry with a Bose-Einstein Condensate. Cass Sackett. Research Talk 17 October 2008

Scattering cross-section (µm 2 )

What is possible to do with noisy quantum computers?

Lecture 4: Polarisation of light, introduction

Transcription:

Homework 3 Contact: jangi@ethz.ch Due date: December 5, 2014 Nano Optics, Fall Semester 2014 Photonics Laboratory, ETH Zürich www.photonics.ethz.ch 1 Coherent Control [22 pts.] In the first part of this exercise, we will discuss the time evolution of the two level system under coherent excitation. In the second part of this exercise, we will remind ourselves of how to treat optical elements such as beam splitters and free propagation with the transfer matrix formalism and apply this formalism the the Mach Zehnder interferometer. In the third part, we will derive the analogous transfer matrices for the Ramsey interferometer and we will look at the similarities between light in a Mach Zehnder interferometer and coherent manipulations of a two-level system. 1.1 State vector vs Bloch vector [8 pts.] The purpose of this exercise is to understand the relationship between [ ] cos(θ/2)e i(φ/2) s x sin(θ) cos(φ) ψ = sin(θ/2)e +i(φ/2) and s = s y = sin(θ) sin(φ), (1) s z cos(θ) the state vector and the Bloch vector, respectively, which are two equivalent descriptions of the two level system. In the lecture we saw that the Bloch equation ṡ = R s, (2) is the equation of motion for the Bloch vector s. It describes a rotation of the Bloch vector s around the rotation axes R = [Ω R cos(φ R ), Ω R sin(φ R ), δ] T at frequency Ω = R. We also found that the equation of motion of the state vector ψ is given by the Schrödinger equation i d dt ψ = ĤRF ψ, (3) where the Hamiltonian is given by Ĥ RF = Ω 2 n R σ, (4) with n R = Ω 1 [Ω R cos(φ R ), Ω R sin(φ R ), δ] T and σ = [σ x, σ y, σ z ] T. The Pauli matrices are defined as [ ] [ ] [ ] 0 1 0 i 1 0 σ x =, σ 1 0 y =, σ i 0 z =. 0 1 1.1.1 State vector equations of motion [3 pts.] 1. Show that the state vector y(t) = M R (Ωt) y 0, (5) 1

[ ] cos(ϕ) sin(ϕ) where the ket y(t) = [y 1, y 2 ] T is a shorthand for a vector of length two and M R (ϕ) = sin(ϕ) cos(ϕ) is the rotation matrix, solves the differential equation 2. Show that where U xy = d dt y = iωσ y y. (6) x = U xy y, (7) [ ] 1 0 is a unitary transformation, i.e. U 0 i xy U xy = 1, solves the differential equation d dt x = iωσ x x (8) 3. Which laser parameters ( Intensity (Ω R ), phase φ R and detuning δ) do I have to choose to obtain a Schrödinger equation (3) of the form (6) and (8), respectively? 1.1.2 Pauli matrices [5 pts.] 1. Show that the operation of the Pauli x and y-matrices on a state vector ψ σ x ψ and σ y ψ. correspond to π - rotations of the Bloch vector s around the x-axis and y-axes, respectively. Hint: Use definitions (1) and calculate the rotation of s around the x and y-axes. 2. The action of the matrix e iα 0 [ e iα/2 0 ] 0 e iα/2 Remember: on a state vector ψ corresponds to a rotation of the Bloch vector by an angle α around the z-axis. Here, α 0 is a global phase and as such doesn t have any meaning. Find the values α and α 0 to turn the above matrix into U xy and σ z, respectively. sin(x) = cos(x π/2) sin(x) = cos(x + π) e ±iπ/2 = ±i sin(x) = sin(x + π/2) cos(x) = cos(x + π/2) 1.2 Mach Zehnder interferometer [9 pts.] This exercises serves as a reminder of how to treat optical elements such as beam splitters and free propagation with the transfer matrix formalism. We will apply the formalism to find the transfer function of a Mach Zehnder interferometer. 2

(a) beam splitter (b) beam propagation A B (c) Mach Zehnder Interferometer A B C D D1 Figure 1: (a) Beam splitter (b) Light propagation (c) Mach Zehnder interferometer D2 1. Consider the following optical element, known as a beam splitter (Fig. 1). The beam splitter has two input ports and two output ports. Assuming that the complex reflection (r) and transmission coefficients (τ) for the two incoming waves are the same, show that the beam splitter transfer matrix can be expressed as [ ] U BS (θ) = e iφ 0 cos(θ/2) i sin(θ/2), (9) i sin(θ/2) cos(θ/2) where θ = 2 arccos( τ ) and φ 0 is an arbitrary global phase. Hint: Write the inputs and outputs as ψ = [a, b] T and use the unitarity condition U BS U BS = 1 2. Consider two plane waves propagating from A to B along different paths (the red and blue path in Fig. 1b). Upon propagation along a path of length L, a plane wave acquires a phase shift of φ prop = 2π λ L, where λ is the wavelength. What is the phase shifter matrix U φ if the path length difference between A and B is L A L B = L? 3. The transfer matrix for the Mach Zehnder interferometer is given by U M = U BS U φu BS (10) 3

What is the intensity at the detectors D1 and D2 for a single beam incident at the first beam splitter? Plot the detector signal as a function of path difference L/λ in the range L/λ = [0... 5]. (Both beam splitters are 50:50) 4. Assume now that L = λ. For each of the zones A, B, C, D give the state vector ψ A, ψ B, etc. and the corresponding Stokes vectors s A, s B. (Optional plot the Stokes vectors on the Bloch sphere) 1.3 Ramsey Interferometer [5 pts.] In this part of the exercise, we will show that the transfer function of the Ramsey sequence (π/2-pulse, free propagation, π/2-pulse) acting on the two-level system state vector has an analogy in the transfer matrix of the Mach Zehnder interferometer from the previous exercise. Ramsey interferometry is used to measure transition frequencies of atoms and has found its application in atomic clocks and in the S.I. definition of the second. 1. Show that the Hamiltonian Ĥz = δ 2 ˆσ z acts as a phase shifter with relative phase shift φ = δt. Hint: Solve the Schrödinger Equation (3) for the Hamiltonian Ĥz. 2. Show that the Hamiltonian Ĥx = Ω R 2 ˆσ x acts as a beam splitter with transmission coefficient ( ) T = τ 2 = cos 2 ΩR 2 t. (11) Hint: Use the results from the previous exercises. Especially (5), (7) and (9). 3. What is the experimental protocol to realize the equivalent Ramsey interferometer of the above Mach Zehnder interferometer? Assume atoms with dipole moment µ = 2 10 29 C/m and transition frequency ω 0 = 2.4 10 15 Hz and a laser with field strength of 4139 V/m and frequency ω = ω 0 + 2π 100 khz. Assume that the first laser pulse starts at t = 0. Plot the field strength of the laser over time. 2 Optical Tweezers [14 pts.] In 1971, Arthur Ashkin investigated dielectric particles exposed to a tightly focused laser beam. He discovered that particles could be trapped an manipulated with the laser beam. By now, this technique (called optical tweezers) of manipulating tiny objects has found widespread applications in biology and physics. x F z Figure 2: Optical force acting on a sub-wavelength particle in the focus of a tightly focused Gaussian beam. 4

In this exercise we consider a dielectric particle subject to a time-harmonic Gaussian beam with angular frequency ω. The particle is much smaller than the wavelength λ. It s polarisability is given by α = α + iα. The field of the Gaussian beam induces a dipole p = αe(r), where r is the location of the particle. The average force acting on the particle given by F(r) = i 1 { } 2 Re p i E i (r), where i [x, y, z]. Using p = αe, the force can be written as F(r) = α 2 i { } Re Ei (r) E i (r) + α 2 i { } Im Ei (r) E i (r) = F grad + F scatt. The first term, which can be expressed as F grad = (α /4) (E E), is referred to as the gradient force. From this expression we see that F grad is the gradient of the potential (E E). Consequently, F grad is conservative, i.e. F grad = 0. The second term, F scatt, is referred to as the scattering force. It can not be expressed as the gradient of a potential. Consequently, F scatt is nonconservative, i.e. F scatt 0. Consider a Gaussian beam in vacuum polarized along the x-axis and focused under an angle θ = 53. The wavelength is λ = 1064 nm and the field strength at the focus is E 0 = 2 10 7 V/m. The particle s radius is a = 150 nm and it s dielectric constant is ε = 2.1. The real part of the polarizability is given by α = 4πε 0 a 3 ε 1 ε + 2 and the imaginary part of the polarizability is given by α = k3 6πε 0 α 2. The origin of our coordinate system is centered at the focus of the Gaussian beam (c.f. Fig. 2). 1. Calculate the power of the Gaussian beam 2. Give an expression for the Gradient force (no numbers) and plot the gradient force F grad along the x-axis in the range x = [ λ.. λ] und F (x) grad = [ 40 pn.. 40 pn]. 3. Expand F (x) grad (x, 0, 0) (x-component of the gradient force along the x-axis) in x and determine the coefficient κ x of the linear term. For small displacements from the focus, the gradient force can now be written as F xgrad κ x x, i.e. the particle behaves as if it was attached to the focus by a spring with spring constant κ x. 4. The equation of motion for a particle moving along the x-axis is mẍ + κ x x = 0. Assume that the specific density of the particle is ρ = 2.5 g/cm 3 and calculate the oscillation frequency Ω of the particle along the x-axis. 5. Give an expression (no numbers) and plot the gradient force F grad along the z-axis in the range z = [ λ.. λ] and F (z) grad = [ 20 pn.. 20 pn]. Calculate the spring constant κ z. Along which direction, x or z, is the motion of the particle more confined? 5

6. The scattering force F scatt pushes the particle away from the focus along the optical axis (z). For the values given above, plot F scatt along the z-axis in the range z = [ λ.. λ] and F (z) scatt = [ 20 pn.. 20 pn]. You can do this numerically. Optional: Find an analytical expression for F (z) scatt. 7. Plot the total force F along the z-axis and calculate (numerically) the displacement z of the equilibrium position due to the scattering force in the range z = [ λ.. λ] and F (z) = [ 10 pn.. 30 pn]. Note that for large particles, the scattering force becomes much larger than the gradient force. Therefore, the size of the particle is an important parameter for optical tweezers. 6