Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method

Similar documents
Numerical analysis of effect of mitigation measures on seismic performance of a liquefiable tailings dam foundation

Numerical model comparison on deformation behavior of a TSF embankment subjected to earthquake loading

Seismic Evaluation of Tailing Storage Facility

Dynamic Analysis Contents - 1

DYNAMIC RESPONSE APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

WHAT SEISMIC HAZARD INFORMATION THE DAM ENGINEERS NEED FROM SEISMOLOGISTS AND GEOLOGISTS?

Liquefaction Potential Variations Influenced by Building Constructions

Safety analyses of Srinagarind dam induced by earthquakes using dynamic response analysis method.

The Seismic Performance of Tousheh Dam During the Chi-Chi Earthquake

Endochronic model applied to earthfill dams with impervious core: design recommendation at seismic sites

The Effect of Earthquake Record Scaling Technique on Embankment Dam Response

Numerical Modelling of Seismic Liquefaction for Bobadil Tailings Dam

Behaviour of Earth Dam under Seismic Load Considering Nonlinearity of the Soil

Seismic Stability of Tailings Dams, an Overview

Determination of Excess Pore Pressure in Earth Dam after Earthquake

TWO DIMENSIONAL MODELING AND STABILITY ANALYSIS OF SLOPES OVERLAYING TO SHAHID RAGAEE POWER PLANT

2D & 3D Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of an Asphaltic Concrete Core Rockfill Dam (a Case Study)

Module 8 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY (Lectures 37 to 40)

Dynamic Soil Pressures on Embedded Retaining Walls: Predictive Capacity Under Varying Loading Frequencies

LIQUEFACTION OF EARTH EMBANKMENT DAMS TWO CASE HISTORIES: (1) LIQUEFACTION OF THE EMBANKMENT SOILS, AND (2) LIQUEFACTION OF THE FOUNDATIONS SOILS

Seismic Analyses of Concrete Gravity Dam with 3D Full Dam Model

Assessment of the Post-earthquake Safety and the Maximum Anti-Seismic Capability of Zipingpu Concrete Face Rockfill Dam

Liquefaction - principles

Review Article: Numerical analysis of the seismic behaviour of earth dam

SEISMIC DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF AN EARTH DAM - A COMPARISON STUDY BETWEEN EQUIVALENT-LINEAR AND NONLINEAR EFFECTIVE-STRESS APPROACHES

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

APPENDIX J. Dynamic Response Analysis

Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading Misko Cubrinovski University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

An Overview of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Site Response Using Effective Stress Analysis

Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil

Review of static and seismic stability of a cross-valley sand tailings embankment in a high rainfall, high seismicity setting

CHAPTER 6: ASSESSMENT OF A COMPREHENSIVE METHOD FOR PREDICTING PERFORMANCE

Advanced Lateral Spread Modeling

Effect of structural design on fundamental frequency of reinforced-soil retaining walls

AN IMPORTANT PITFALL OF PSEUDO-STATIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Back Analysis of the Lower San Fernando Dam Slide Using a Multi-block Model

Dynamic Analyses of an Earthfill Dam on Over-Consolidated Silt with Cyclic Strain Softening

13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 2004 Paper No. 3016

Evaluation of the behaviour of an arch-gravity dam. featuring a pre-existing crack

Assessment of Static and Dynamic Behaviour of Emarat Earth Dam by Finite Difference Method

Seismic stability safety evaluation of gravity dam with shear strength reduction method

Liquefaction and Foundations

STEVENS CREEK DAM SEISMIC STABILITY EVALUATIONS OF CHESBRO, LENIHAN, STEVENS CREEK, AND UVAS DAMS (SSE2) PHASE A: STEVENS CREEK AND LENIHAN DAMS

Three-dimensional settlement analysis of a primary crusher station at a copper mine in Chile

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF AN EMBEDDED RETAINING STRUCTURE IN COARSE-GRAINED SOILS

GROUND MOTIONS AND SEISMIC STABILITY OF EMBANKMENT DAMS FAIZ I. MAKDISI AMEC, E&I, INC. OAKLAND, CA

Finite Deformation Analysis of Dynamic Behavior of Embankment on Liquefiable Sand Deposit Considering Pore Water Flow and Migration

1D Ground Response Analysis

Liquefaction Remediation

Evaluating the Seismic Coefficient for Slope Stability Analyses

Investigation of Liquefaction Behaviour for Cohesive Soils

EARTHQUAKE SAFETY OF AN ARCH-GRAVITY DAM WITH A HORIZONTAL CRACK IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE DAM

Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards

Instructor : Dr. Jehad Hamad. Chapter (7)

Geo-Seismic Environmental Aspects Affecting Tailings Dams Failures

Performance of Multi-Block Gravity Quay-Wall Subjected to Strong Earthquake Motions: Numerical Simulation of Centrifuge Test

PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS THAT MAY EMERGE IN THE FOUNDATION AND BODY OF A HOMOGENEOUS FILL DAM ON A WEAK CLAYEY-SILTY-SANDY FORMATION ÇIKRIKÇI DAM

Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment

On seismic landslide hazard assessment: Reply. Citation Geotechnique, 2008, v. 58 n. 10, p

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 1, 2012

COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D ANALYSES OF SEISMIC STABILITY OF DETACHED BLOCKS IN AN ARCH DAM

Recent Research on EPS Geofoam Seismic Buffers. Richard J. Bathurst and Saman Zarnani GeoEngineering Centre at Queen s-rmc Canada

Effect of Canyon Geometry and Ground Conditions on the Seismic Performance of Tendaho Earthfill Dam in Ethiopia.

Safety of Rockfill Dam upon Underwater Explosion Limin Zhang Tianhua Xu

SAFETY CHECK OF SONDUR DAM FOR CHANGED SEISMIC CONDITION Aryak shori 1, R.K.Tripthi 2 and M. K. Verma 3

Phase II Report: Project Definition Options. Dam Safety

SEEPAGE ANALYSIS AND SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF EARTH FILL DAM USING GEO-STUDIO

Seismic Analysis of Siri Dam Using Pseudo-Static Approach

EVALUATING THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF STONE CANYON DAM WITH 2-D AND 3-D ANALYSES

Improvement mechanisms of stone columns as a mitigation measure against liquefaction-induced lateral spreading

STEVENS CREEK DAM SEISMIC STABILITY EVALUATIONS OF CHESBRO, LENIHAN, STEVENS CREEK, AND UVAS DAMS (SSE2) PHASE A: STEVENS CREEK AND LENIHAN DAMS

APPENDIX I. Deformation Analysis of the Left Abutment

Cubzac-les-Ponts Experimental Embankments on Soft Clay

Module 6 LIQUEFACTION (Lectures 27 to 32)

Research Article Soil Saturated Simulation in Embankment during Strong Earthquake by Effect of Elasticity Modulus

Seismic Numerical Simulation of Breakwater on a Liquefiable Layer: IRAN LNG Port

2D Embankment and Slope Analysis (Numerical)

A Visco-Elastic Model with Loading History Dependent Modulus and Damping for Seismic Response Analyses of Soils. Zhiliang Wang 1 and Fenggang Ma 2.

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

Address for Correspondence

Lateral Earth Pressure

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE FACED ROCKFILL DAMS DURING EARTHQUAKES

The Role of Slope Geometry on Flowslide Occurrence

1D Analysis - Simplified Methods

FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION OF RETROGRESSIVE FAILURE OF SUBMARINE SLOPES

SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENT IN A MODERATE SEISMICITY REGION, HONG KONG

LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT BY THE ENERGY METHOD THROUGH CENTRIFUGE MODELING

Date: April 2, 2014 Project No.: Prepared For: Mr. Adam Kates CLASSIC COMMUNITIES 1068 E. Meadow Circle Palo Alto, California 94303

IZMIT BAY BRIDGE SOUTH APPROACH VIADUCT: SEISMIC DESIGN NEXT TO THE NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT

1 Slope Stability for a Cohesive and Frictional Soil

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

Ground Motions and Liquefaction Potential

1-160 Dynamic Analysis

ANALYSIS OF DAM RESPONSE FOR FOUNDATION FAULT RUPTURE

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

file:///d /suhasini/suha/office/html2pdf/ _editable/slides/module%202/lecture%206/6.1/1.html[3/9/2012 4:09:25 PM]

Application of advanced bounding surface plasticity model in static and seismic analyses of Zipingpu Dam

2-D Liquefaction Evaluation with Q4Mesh

Fujinuma Dam Performance during 2011 Tohoku Earthquake, Japan and Failure Mechanism by FEM

Transcription:

Seismic Design of a Hydraulic Fill Dam by Nonlinear Time History Method E. Yıldız & A.F. Gürdil Temelsu International Engineering Services Inc., Ankara, Turkey SUMMARY: Time history analyses conducted for the seismic stability and deformation evaluation of Kairakkum Dam is presented. The dam body constructed as hydraulic fill rests on an alluvium layer of 10 m overlying the bedrock. Considering the high ground acceleration values up to 0.78 g, it is found necessary to perform detailed timehistory analyses capable of modelling the nonlinear behaviour of soil, the coupled relationship between stress and pore pressure and the reduction in shear strength of the material related to liquefaction. The material parameters are based on the results of geotechnical and geophysical investigations at dam site. Obtained permanent deformations showed that for OBE, the freeboard is sufficient and the dam is safe. For MDE loading, the obtained displacements are greater than allowable limits indicating the unsafety of the dam. In this regard, an improvement of the dam body is found to be necessary and preliminary remedial measures are suggested. Keywords: Embankment dam, hydraulic fill, seismic 1. INTRODUCTION Kairakkum Dam is located in Tajikistan, on the Syr-Derya River that comes from Uzbekistan and return to Uzbekistan after passing Kairakkum Reservoir. The dam with a maximum height of 27 m, crest length of 1200 m, reservoir volume of 3131 million m 3 has been constructed with hydraulic fill technique in years between 1952 and 1959. The middle part of the dam body is composed of fine sand and silty material in order to decrease seepage by providing sealing and coarser granular fills take part at the sides to provide support to middle area; besides rockfill buttresses are constituted at both upstream and downstream slopes. The dam body rests on an alluvium layer of about 10 m thickness overlying the bedrock. The seismic stability of Kairakkum Dam has been examined within the scope of Consulting Services for Improvement of the Kairakkum Dam and Reservoir Safety and Operations. Since the dam is located in a region with a very high seismicity, advanced methods are considered as necessary to assess the earthquake safety, and for this purpose time history analyses have been conducted by utilizing FLAC, that is a widely used and accepted computer program to study the dynamic response of embankment dams. The pseudo-static and equivalent linear methods, which have been used in collaboration with time history analyses in the seismic safety assessment of the dam are excluded from the scope of this paper, and detailed information and results are presented for the time history calculations only. 2. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION 2.1. Geometry and Model The typical cross-section of the dam and the finite difference grid that has been constructed by considering the maximum height of the dam are given in Figures 1 and 2 respectively. Five different

material zones are taken into account according to the design as hydraulic fill, foundation alluvium, buttress of granular fill, buttress of rock fill and bedrock. The riprap layer in the upstream has been neglected in the numerical model for simplification, considering that it will not substantially affect the results due to its small thickness. For the dam with a crest length of 30 m, the gradient of the slopes have been designed as 1V/4H, 1V/3H and 1V/2H for the hydraulic fill, buttress of granular fill and buttress of rock fill layers respectively. The middle part of the dam constructed as hydraulic fill rests on an alluvium layer with about 10 m thickness. It is provided for the buttresses in the upstream and downstream sides to rest on bedrock by excavation of the alluvium at those regions. The maximum height of the dam is about 27 m from the foundation level. Figure 2.1. Typical Cross-Section of the Dam 2.2. Material Properties Figure 2.2. Finite Difference Grid The material parameters used in the finite difference calculations are summarized in Table 1. The unit weight and the angle of friction for the hydraulic fill are determined according to the average results obtained from the geotechnical investigations. The maximum shear modulus (G max ) for the bedrock and hydraulic fill is designated based on the shear wave velocities measured at the site. In the conducted geophysical study, the average shear wave velocity is determined as V s = 300 m/s for the hydraulic fill. In order to take into account the increase of shear wave velocity with depth, the hydraulic fill zone is divided to four layers and the shear wave velocities are assumed as V s = 225,275,325 and 375 m/s from up to bottom providing the same average velocity. The shear wave velocity of the bedrock is taken as V s = 550 m/s according to the geophysical investigation results. The shear wave velocities of the remaining zones are designated by considering typical values in literature for similar soils. In-situ tests show that the permeability of the hydraulic fill varies between 3.1 and 4.3 m / day. To determine the permeability coefficients for the seepage calculations, the average permeability coefficient of k = 4 m / day is assumed and the potential anisotropy in the fill is taken into account by

taking 25 as the ratio of horizontal to vertical permeability, as suggested by Sherard et al.(1963) for uniform soil deposits. The nonlinear stress-strain behaviour of the embankment dam is considered by using an elastic-perfect plastic material model with Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for all of the material zones. Moreover, the hysteretic damping modulus reduction method, dynamically induced pore water pressures and the related liquefaction modelling used in the analyses are presented in Section 2.4. Table 1. Material Parameters Hydraulic Fill γ dry γ sat c' φ' V s G max ν k h k v (kn/m 3 ) (kn/m 3 ) (kpa) (deg.) (m/s) (MPa) - (cm/s) (cm/s) 16 20,0-30 225 ~375 (ave. 300) 81~225 0,25 2 x 10-2 9 x 10-4 Alluvium 17 20,5-32 400 725 0,33 10-2 10-2 Granular Fill 18 21,0-36 450 970 0,33 5 x 10-2 5 x 10-2 Rockfill 20 22,5-42 500 1330 0,33 10-1 10-1 Bedrock 22 23,5 50 30 550 1600 0,20 10-5 10-5 2.3. Load Cases The seismicity of the dam site and the seismic design parameters for different earthquake return periods are have been examined with the conducted probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Accordingly, the peak ground acceleration (PGA) values have been determined as 0.25 g, 0.67 g and 0.78 g corresponding to 150, 5 000 and 10 000 year return periods. For Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE), a 150-year earthquake; and for Maximum Design Earthquake (MDE), 5 000-year and 10 000- year earthquakes have been taken into account. In 1985, when the reservoir level was 13 m below the crest, an earthquake with a magnitude of Mw=6.5 has occurred at the dam site, causing damages like cracks due to shear in the reinforced concrete members in the power plant, and overturning of the transformers. To be used in the seismic design, elastic design spectra have been developed by the approach suggested by Newmark & Hall (1982), considering the peak ground accelerations for each of the earthquake return periods given above. The damping ratio for the respective design spectra is assumed as 10%, considering the type of the embankment dam. The earthquake loading is carried out by applying acceleration-time histories to the base of the model in the utilized finite difference program. For this reason, it is adopted to use ground motions which are in accordance with the developed elastic design spectra. So, three selected original ground motions as San Fernando 1971, Kushiro 1993 and Kocaeli 1999 are modified in order to provide the frequency content of the ground motions matching the design spectra. As an example, the modified ground motion records and the acceleration response spectra of these with the design spectrum are shown in Figures 3 and 4. In the nonlinear analyses conducted for embankment dams, the initial stress conditions and the pore water pressures have to be determined correctly prior to the application of the earthquake motion. For this purpose, the results obtained from the separate two analyses of static stress and seepage have been combined and the phreatic line and effective stress distribution has been attained before the seismic loading. After this stage, the earthquake loading has been carried out by means of applying the acceleration-time records to the base of the model.

Kocaeli Modified Acceleration Time History Used In the Dynamic Analyses 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 Acc. (g) 0.05 0.00-0.05-0.10-0.15-0.20-0.25 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Time (s) San Fernando Modified Acceleration Time History Used In the Dynamic Analyses Kushiro Modified Acceleration Time History Used In the Dynamic Analyses 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 Acc. (g) 0.00 Acc. (g) 0.00-0.10-0.10-0.20-0.20-0.30-0.30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Time (s) Time (s) Figure 2.3. Acceleration-Time Histories Used in the Analyses (OBE) 0.5 (Amax=0.25g, 150-year EQ) 0.4 Spectral Acceleration, Sa (g) 0.3 0.2 0.1 Design Spectrum (Newmark & Hall,1982) Modified San Fernando EQ Modified Kushiro EQ Modified Kocaeli EQ 0 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 Period, T (s) Figure 2.4. Acceleration Response Spectra of the Ground Motions (OBE) 2.4. Damping and Dynamic Pore Pressure Generation The hysteretic damping option, that considers the increase of damping and decrease of the shear modulus with increasing shear strain, is utilized in the analyses. The hysteretic damping is only active within the linear elastic region. As the yield is reached, the hysteretic damping is switched off and the damping is essentially controlled by the plastic strains based on the constitutive model. The reader is referred to Itasca (2008) for a more detailed information on the damping. For all of the dam zones, coupled stress-pore pressure relationship has been taken into account. The generation and dissipation of the pore water pressures are considered by the seepage calculations based on the given permeability's, concurrently during the earthquake. The pore water pressures are related to the pore volume change resulted by the mechanical loading in FLAC program. A semi-coupled liquefaction approach, Finn-Byrne model has been utilized for the

hydraulic fill, appraised as potentially liquefiable. In the subject model, the reduction in volumetric strain,, ε vd, related to the engineering shear strain, γ, is obtained by the below formula, ε γ vd ε = C1 exp( C2 γ vd ) (2.1) where C 1 and C 2 are the model coefficients. C 2 is given as 0.4 / C 1, and C 1 is suggested as given below based on the relative density of the material. C (2.2) 2.5 1 = 7600( DR ) The above formulas allow the calculation of the excess pore water pressures induced by the cyclic shear strains, and the related decrease in the effective stresses and accordingly the shear strength of the material, using only the relative density of the material. The relative density of the hydraulic fill has not been able to be determined precisely with the conducted in-situ and laboratory tests, so two different relative densities of 40% and 50% are considered in the evaluation. The reader is referred to Itasca (2008) for more detailed information about the dynamic pore water pressures. 3. ANALYSES RESULTS 3.1. Initial Conditions Initial stress distribution has been obtained before the earthquake loading in the analyses where the dam zones are modelled as elastic-plastic materials having strength relied on the effective stress. The phreatic line has been calculated considering the levels of 347.5 and 327.5 m for upstream and downstream respectively, where the crest level is 351.5 m. Attained pore water pressures are combined with the static stress analysis results in order to determine the effective stresses prior to seismic shaking. Initial pore water pressures are shown in Figure 3.1. 3.2. OBE Loading Figure 3.1. Initial Pore Water Pressure Distribution According to the results obtained from the analyses carried out using three different earthquake records for OBE loading, permanent deformations have occurred especially in the middle part of the dam composed of hydraulic fill but the stability of the dam has been retained at the end of the earthquake. Since it is not possible to present all of the results within the scope of this paper, the critical results of them all, obtained for Kushiro ground motion and Dr = 50% relative density, are presented as example. The time variation of crest settlement during the earthquake given in Figure 3.4 indicate the displacements have been resulted by reaching of strength limits during earthquake, but the increase in the displacements have been ended and the system reaches to a stable condition at the end of earthquake motion. The crest settlement has been calculated as between 1.3 1.6 m and between 1.1 1.25 m for Dr = 40% and Dr = 50% relative densities respectively. Here, the same strength

parameters have been used for the two cases of different relative density; it is observed that the relative density of the embankment have led to different settlements though it only affects the dynamic pore water pressures. This indicates the effect of using a liquefaction model for the hydraulic fill. It can be seen from the permanent deformation vectors shown in Figure 3.2 that during the cyclic motion in the upstream and downstream slopes, plastic deformations take place in both directions and the settlement of the dam is mainly induced by these outward displacements. Figure 3.3 that the shear strains at the end of the earthquake are shown indicate that the yielding at different parts and at various instants of the earthquake cause a somewhat failure mechanism generated to both directions. Figure 3.2. Permanent Deformation Vectors (OBE) Figure 3.3. Plastic Shear Strains After Earthquake (OBE) Figure 3.4. Settlement of Crest vs. Time (OBE) For an earthquake of this level, relatively stronger buttresses have provided the necessary support to the hydraulic fill and prevented the displacements to get larger. The primary reason of the crest settlement and permanent displacements is the temporarily yielding in the weak hydraulic fill zone with the effect of the dynamic pore water pressures.

The permanent settlements are about 1/3 of the freeboard whereas this level of settlement (0 5 ft) is considered as acceptable by DSOD (California Department of Water Resources). 3.3. MDE Loading Earthquakes with return periods of 5 000 and 10 000 years are considered for MDE loading as explained in Section 2.3. For the analysis conducted by using Kushiro ground motion with PGA = 0.67 g corresponding to 5 000-year earthquake and assuming Dr = 40%, the plastic deformations occurred in the downstream of hydraulic fill resulted in excessive distortion of the finite difference grid over the limits and the analysis has stopped. As the displacements and shear strains at this condition has been examined, it has been concluded that the hydraulic fill with a relative density of Dr = 40% loses its stability when subjected to a 5 000-year earthquake. For the same peak ground acceleration and assuming a relative density of Dr = 50% for hydraulic fill, the crest settlement has been obtained between 3.3 3.75 m which is very close to the freeboard of the dam as 4 m. Only the relative density of Dr = 50% has been considered for 10 000-year earthquake loading since the stability has not been retained for Dr = 40% in 5 000-year earthquake loading. The below figures given as example show the results obtained for Kushiro ground motion. It is observed from Figure 3.7 showing the crest settlement during earthquake, the system has reached equilibrium and the stability of the dam has been retained. As indicated by the permanent deformation vectors and plastic shear strains shown in Figures 3.5 and 3.6, the strength of the material has been temporarily reached in the whole dam body including the granular and rock fill buttresses and the plastic deformations have led to large displacements especially to the downstream direction. The plastic shear strains show two different failure mechanisms in the downstream, one within the hydraulic fill and the other passing through the alluvium and under the buttresses. Figure 3.5. Permanent Deformation Vectors (MDE) Figure 3.6. Plastic Shear Strains After Earthquake (MDE) The crest settlement of 3.5 m obtained for Kocaeli ground motion is very close to the freeboard. In the analyses conducted for San Fernando and Kushiro ground motions, the crest settlement is calculated over the freeboard as 4.2 m and 4.6 m, indicating the overtopping and accordingly the failure of the dam failure under operation conditions in case of a 10 000-year earthquake.

Figure 3.7. Settlement of Crest vs. Time (MDE) Results presented above show that the dam is not safe for MDE level, therefore improvement and remediation alternatives have been suggested for the upstream and downstream regions of the hydraulic fill. 4. CONCLUSIONS The seismic stability and permanent displacements of Kairakkum Dam of hydraulic fill type have been evaluated by conducting time history analyses where the nonlinear stress-strain properties of materials, coupled stress-pore pressure relationship and the dynamically induced pore pressures related to liquefaction in the hydraulic fill are taken into account. Obtained results have shown that the freeboard is sufficient for an earthquake of 150 year return period corresponding to operating basis earthquake (OBE). For the maximum design earthquake (MDE) considered with 5 000 and 10 000 year return periods, obtained permanent deformations have exceeded the acceptable limits and it has been observed that the dam is insufficient in terms of earthquake safety. In this regard, it has found reasonable to make improvements and remedial works in the dam body and proposal designs have been developed. In the downstream slope, stone columns are suggested with the depth, diameter and spacing's to be determined by detailed calculations. Stone columns will increase the shear strength of the hydraulic fill by means of densifying, and will also function to provide drainage as well. For the hydraulic fill in the upstream side, alternatives of performing similar stone columns at the whole slope, and to backfill with granular material after excavation up to a certain elevation are presented as suggestions for the detailed remedial works to be studied in the future. REFERENCES: Beaty, M.H. and Perlea, V.G. (2011). Several Observations on Advanced Analyses with Liquefable Materials. 31st Annual USSD Conference, San Diego, California, April 11-15,2011. Bureau, G.J. (2003), Dams and Appurtenant Facilities. Earthquake Engineering Handbook, Chapter 26, Chen W. And Scawthorn C. ed., CRC Press.

Newmark, N.M. And Hall, W.J. (1982). Earthquake Spectra and Design, Engineering Monographs on Earthquake Criteria, Structural Design, and Strong Motion Records, Vol: 3, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. (2008), FLAC ver 6.0 User s Guide, Dynamic Analysis, Minneapolis:Itasca. Sherard, J.L., Woodward, R.J., Gizienski, S.F., and Clevenges, W.A. (1963), Earth and Earth-Rock Dams, John Wiley & Sons, New York.