Ivan Valtchanov Herschel Science Centre European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) ESA. ESAC,20-21 Sep 2007 Ivan Valtchanov, Herschel Science Centre

Similar documents
SPIRE In-flight Performance, Status and Plans Matt Griffin on behalf of the SPIRE Consortium Herschel First Results Workshop Madrid, Dec.

SPIRE/PACS Parallel Mode

Announcement of Opportunity for Open Time. SPIRE PACS Parallel Mode Observers' Manual

SPIRE Observers Manual

SPIRE/PACS Parallel Mode

PACS Wavelength Switching AOT release note

esac Release Note for the Herschel SPIRE Fourier-Transform Spectrometer Background Subtracted Spectra

SPIRE Spectrometer data analysis

SPIRE FTS Pipelines and Data Products Trevor Fulton

A software simulator for the Herschel-SPIRE imaging photometer

FIRST carrier spacecraft

SPIRE: Herschel s Submillimetre Camera and Spectrometer

Submillimetre astronomy

PACS spectroscopy Data Analysis

Determining the optimum scan map strategy for Herschel-SPIRE using the SPIRE photometer simulator

Announcement of Opportunity AKARI (ASTRO-F)

Observing with the Infrared Spectrograph

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 17 Jun 2009

1 General Considerations: Point Source Sensitivity, Surface Brightness Sensitivity, and Photometry

Methane in Mars Atmosphere: Evidence for Life or Uncertain Detections?

PACS Spectrometer Wavelength Calibration

Flux Units and Line Lists

PACS Spectroscopy performance and calibration PACS Spectroscopy performance and calibration

NAOYUKI TAMURA Subaru Instrument Astronomer Subaru Telescope, NAOJ

The Herschel/PACS Point Source Catalog

Fundamental Limits to Wavefront Sensing in the Submillimeter

THE PACS INSTRUMENT. A. Poglitsch 1 and B. Altieri 2. 1 Introduction

SUBJECT: SPIRE Spectrometer Detector Thermal Time Constant Derivation Procedure

MID INFRARED ASTRONOMY TECHNIQUES, AND DATA

Calibration of the Herschel SPIRE Fourier Transform Spectrometer

XMM-Newton Optical-UV Monitor: introduction and calibration status OM instrument and calibration

Open Research Online The Open University s repository of research publications and other research outputs

Herschel Photodetector Array Camera & Spectrometer

SPIRE Spectrometer Pipeline Description

1. Give short answers to the following questions. a. What limits the size of a corrected field of view in AO?

Notes: Reference: Merline, W. J. and S. B. Howell (1995). "A Realistic Model for Point-sources Imaged on Array Detectors: The Model and Initial

ABSTRACT. a Institute for Space Imaging Science, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K 3M4, Canada; b Joint

The Herschel Space Observatory: Mission Overview and Observing Opportunities

The in-orbit wavelength calibration of the WFC G800L grism

CONFUSION NOISE AND BACKGROUND

BINGO simulations and updates on the performance of. the instrument

NIRSpec Multi-Object Spectroscopy of Distant Galaxies

FORCAST: Science Capabili2es and Data Products. William D. Vacca

Gemini Integration Time Calculators

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 5 Mar 2014

MIPS µm photometry for the Herschel-SPIRE Local Galaxies Guaranteed Time Programs

ISOPHOT-related calibration work at Konkoly Observatory

GOODS-Herschel data release

Infrared Astronomy. Generally ~ 1μm (10,000 Å) few hundred μm

The data processing pipeline for the Herschel SPIRE Fourier Transform Spectrometer

Performance Evaluation of the Herschel/SPIRE Instrument Flight Model Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer

CHAPTER 10 Techniques for Background Measurement and Mosaicing

Photometric Studies of GEO Debris

Common questions when planning observations with DKIST Jan 30, 2018

Testing the MCS Deconvolution Algorithm on Infrared Data. Michael P. Egan National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency Basic and Applied Research Office

Chris Pearson: RAL Space. Chris Pearson: April

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 9 Jan 2014

Space Cryogenics at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Some ML and AI challenges in current and future optical and near infra imaging datasets

Document Number: SPIRE-UCF-DOC Issue 1.0. November Matt Griffin

ROSAT Roentgen Satellite. Chandra X-ray Observatory

HIFI webinar: News, Calibrations, and Data Processing Updates

Continuum Observing. Continuum Emission and Single Dishes

The next-generation Infrared astronomy mission SPICA Space Infrared Telescope for Cosmology & Astrophysics

Infrared calibration stars as millimeter standards

Instrument Concept. Herschel OT KP Workshop ESTEC, Feb Focal Plane Footprint. PACS Instrument & GT Programme x 32 pixels 3.2 x 3.

Commissioning of the Hanle Autoguider

MTG-IRS processing overview and performances. Dorothee Coppens and Bertrand Theodore

The SPICA infrared space observatory project status

ASTRO-F SURVEY AS INPUT CATALOGUES FOR FIRST. Takao Nakagawa

Surface brightness comparison of PACS blue array with IRAS and Spitzer/MIPS images. Babar Ali, NHSC

Herschel Calibration Report for HUG#9.

Distant galaxies: a future 25-m submm telescope

NICMOS Status and Plans

Chopping and Nodding for Mid-Infrared Astronomy Kevin Volk December 2007

Planetary Models updates

EXPOSURE TIME ESTIMATION

THE LAST SURVEY OF THE OLD WSRT: TOOLS AND RESULTS FOR THE FUTURE HI ABSORPTION SURVEYS

The Herschel-SPIRE Point Source Catalog Feasibility Study Report

Fourier transform spectroscopy: an introduction. David Naylor University of Lethbridge

SKA Continuum Deep Field Surveys

SPOT Meeting # 7 Overview and Summary. SOFIA USERS GROUP Sept 17, 2012

Can we do this science with SKA1-mid?

Spitzer Space Telescope Calibration Strategy: The Use of Asteroids

PACS_S Flux Calibration Concept

Quantifying and mitigating correlated noise between formed beams on the ASKAP Phased Array Feeds

Herschel and Planck: ESA s New Astronomy Missions an introduction. Martin Kessler Schloss Braunshardt 19/03/2009

IRAM Memo IRAM-30m EMIR time/sensitivity estimator

PACS Spectroscopy performance and calibration PACS Spectroscopy performance and calibration

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

Planck and Virtual Observatories: Far Infra-red / Sub-mm Specificities

Spitzer Space Telescope

TNOs are Cool: A Survey of the Transneptunian Region. (37 members, 19 institutes, 9 countries)

Measuring the Redshift of M104 The Sombrero Galaxy

15m James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) Surface accuracy : 24 micron Pointing accuracy : 2 arcsec in Azimuth and Elevation

Updated flux calibration and fringe modelling for the ACS/WFC G800L grism

An Introduction to the Cycle 4 ALMA Observing Tool

Fully achromatic nulling interferometer (FANI) for high SNR exoplanet characterization

Ground and On-Orbit Characterization and Calibration of the Geosynchronous Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS)

The Promise of Herschel

Transcription:

SPIRE Observing Strategies Ivan Valtchanov Herschel Science Centre European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) ESA

Outline SPIRE quick overview Observing with SPIRE Astronomical Observation Templates (AOT) Photometry: point source, small map, large map Spectroscopy with Fourier-Transform Spectrometer (FTS) Observing strategies 2/58

Herschel Focal Plane Projected on the sky 3/58

SPIRE Photometer Overview 4' 8' Beam: 18 25 36 4/58

SPIRE Spectrometer SLW: 316-672 μm Beam (FWHM): 34 SSW: 194-324 μm 18 5/58

SPIRE Spectrometer Unvignetted field: 2.6' diameter 6/58

SPIRE Spectrometer Overview Fourier-Transform Spectrometer Interferometer in Mach-Zehnder configuration Signal vs Optical Path Difference (OPD) Inverse Fourier transform => spectrum vs wavenumber (1/λ) The entire spectral coverage is observed in one go Two bands: Short (SSW): 194-324 μm (1545 925 GHz) Long (SLW): 316-672 μm (949 446 GHz) Spectral resolution: Low: Δσ = 1 cm-1 Medium: Δσ = 0.25 cm-1 High: Δσ = 0.04 cm-1 Field of view: 2.6' diameter 7/58

Things to Remember Photometer and FTS in mid-ir/submm range: 200-700 μm The two sub-instruments cannot operate simultaneously Five detector arrays (detector=bolometer) PLW, PMW, PSW SLW, SSW Operate at 300 mk with 3He sorption cooler, 48 hours hold time => recycling necessary Photometer field of view: 4x8 arcmin Spectrometer field of view: 2.6 arcmin diameter Field of view not filled by the detectors 8/58

SPIRE Observing Templates 9/58

Photometric observations Introducing chopping: (source+background) background Done with the Beam Steering Mirror (BSM) on ± Y axis Chop frequency (2Hz) Chop throw depending on the observing mode Introducing jiggling Moving the BSM to re-position the target in the instrument (Y,Z) plane Introducing nodding Done with the Herschel spacecraft. 10/58

SPIRE Photometer Point Source Photometry 11/58

Pointing Error Introducing the Absolute Pointing Error (APE) of the telescope. Signal loss (%) 20 On-ground measured APE is 2.45 (68%) Signal loss for blind pointing 16 250 µm 12 350 µm 8 4 500 µm 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Pointing offset (arcsec.) 12/58

Point Source Observations 7-point map (+ repeat the central point) 5th jiggle position Angular step θ ~ 6 1/3 of the beam at 250 μm > twice the APE Total flux and position fitted Compared to single accurately pointed observation, S/N for same total integration time is only degraded by ~ 20% ~ 13% ~ 6% at at at θ 250 μm 350 μm 500 μm 13/58

Point Source Observations How is it working? Introducing the ABBA cycle First nod position (Nod A) At each 8 jiggle positions: 16 chop cycles at 2 Hz Nod to second position (Nod B) and repeat At each 8 jiggle positions: 16 chop cycles at 2 Hz Stay in Nod B and repeat Nod to Nod A and repeat Chop throw = Nod distance = 126 (± 63 ) 14/58

Point Source Observations Overall timing and performance Number of repeats: 1 (number of ABBA cycles) On-source integration time: 256 s Instrument and observing overheads: 143 s Observatory overhead: 180 s Total observation time: 579 s 1-σ noise (250, 350, 500): (1.4, 1.6, 1.3) mjy Note: already lower than the extragalactic confusion noise limits. 15/58

Point Source Observations Some Points to Note The calculated sensitivity assumes the ideal case in which the source is on-axis A sparse (undersampled) map of a roughly 2 x 4 arcmin region around the source will also be generated by seven-point observations Data will be fitted to find the flux density and position of the source (pipeline) 16/58

Point Source Photometry Résumé For sources with intrinsic size less than the beam size 7-point jiggle and ABBA nod pattern with chopping Total duration ~10 min (including overheads) Sparse map around the source 17/58

SPIRE Photometer Small Map 18/58

Small Map Observations No full spatial sampling with SPIRE arrays => fully filled jiggle pattern is necessary: 64 point jiggle Only AB cycle: 16 points per AB cycle, 4 chop cycles at 2 Hz 1-16: AB, 17-32: BA, 33-48: AB, 49-64: BA. Chop throw = Nod distance = 4' (±2') Fully sampled field of view: 4'x4' Guaranteed area is a circle with 4' diameter 19/58

Small Map Observations 20/58

Small Map Observations Array orientation on sky depends on date of observation Guaranteed area of 4 arcmin diameter circle Note: for sources near the ecliptic the array orientation on the sky is fixed Guaranteed area 21/58

Small Map Observations Overall timing and performance Number of repeats: 1 (number of AB cycles) On-source integration time: 256 s Instrument and observing overheads: 251 s Observatory overhead: 180 s Total observation time: 687 s 1-σ noise (250, 350, 500): (4.7, 6.3, 5.3) mjy 22/58

Small Map Observations Overall timing and performance Number of repeats: 2 (number of AB cycles) On-source integration time: 512 s Instrument and observing overheads: 443 s Observatory overhead: 180 s Total observation time: 1135 s 1-σ noise (250, 350, 500): (3.3, 4.5, 3.8) mjy already close to the confusion limits. 23/58

Small Map Observations Résumé Region of interest is of size 4 arcmin diameter 64-point jiggle with AB nod pattern, +chopping 4x4 arcmin fully sampled map at the observation day Total duration for one repeat: 11.5 minutes 24/58

Chop avoidance For both Point Source Photometry or Small Map modes three pairs of chop avoidance angles can be set: when the chopping falls on bad region and may hamper the subtraction Note: chopping direction (+/- Y axis) depends on the observational day. Penalized by 10 min overhead: complicates the mission planning. 25/58

Chop avoidance M82 example 26/58

SPIRE Photometer Large Map 27/58

Z-Axis SPIRE array Large Map Y-Axis Scanning angle between Z-axis and scan direction = Scan leg start point (at constant speed) Scan direction Dec. Scan leg separation User requested map area Guaranteed map area (rotation of scan pattern dependent on date) R.A. ESAC,20-21 Scan legs are slightly longer than the user requested length, to ensure the user requested area is properly covered Sep 2007 28/58

Large Map scan directions Scan B +42.4 deg +Z -42.4 deg Scan A +Y (250 µm array) 29/58

Scan coverage Uniform scan speed distance 348 Scan leg Map area covered to uniform sensitivity (user required area) SPIRE 250 µm array size 30/58

Large Map 1/f noise Only in scan map mode Correlated and uncorrelated 1/f noise. The correlated 1/f noise will be removed by the SPIRE pipeline. Appears like large scale structure in the map and will affect the point source detection. Uncorrelated 1/f noise can be dealt with by performing crosslinked observations. 31/58

Scan A Scan B Cross-scan Example

Large Map coverage Scan A Scan B Guaranteed Coverage 33/58

Large Map Observations Scan speed: Nominal (30 /s) and Fast (60 /s) when to go for Fast scanning? large-scale features (PSF smearing) 1/f is less significant Single scan direction: either Scan A or Scan B direction Cross-linked scans (default): Scan A + Scan B 34/58

Large Map Observations Default scan speed: 30 /s Maximum scan length and height (single scan only): 19.82 x 4 deg Maximum cross-scan area: 226'x226' (~4x4 deg) Scan legs follow great circles on the sky Scanning angle is fixed at optimum observing Cross-linked observations for reducing 1/f noise Sensitive to all spatial scales, up to the size of the map itself 35/58

Large Map some points to note 'On-source integration time' refers to the total time it takes to observe the map area (excluding overheads) This quantity does not determine the sensitivity Sensitivity is governed by the number of map repeats Maps of any size have the same sensitivity This leads to discrete sensitivity levels: ΔS ~ 1/N1/2 For single scan rectangular maps: more efficient if scan length is greater than the scan height. It does not matter for cross-linked scans. 36/58

Large Map overheads Telescope/spacecraft turn around and stabilisation of the pointing accuracy acceleration/deceleration Regular (at least every 45 min) PCAL flashes The larger the map the more efficient the observation: Effective integration time vs overheads 37/58

Large Map performance* Array 250 µm 350 µm 500 µm Effective integration time per map repeat (s) 11 11.4 12.3 S (5 σ) for one map repeat (mjy) 68 93 79 Time to map 1 deg2 to 3 mjy rms (hrs, excluding overheads) 8.5 16 12 Number of map repeats needed to reach 3 mjy rms 20 38 27 *HSpot sensitivities for version 3.0.7, Sep 2007 38/58

Large Map orientation Map orientation can be set: pair of angles East of North Currently no indication in HSpot: but see the SPIRE Observers' Manual Penalized by 10 min overhead 39/58

Large Map Résumé For areas greater than 4 arcmin diameter Scanning at constant speed over great circles at a specific angle Cross-linked scans to fight uncorrelated 1/f noise (max 4x4 deg) Sensitivity by map repeats 40/58

SPIRE Spectrometer 41/58

Spectrometer observing modes Source size Single point (1 FOV with diameter of 2 ) Raster (many FOVs) Spatial sampling Sparse 2 beam spacing Intermediate 1 beam spacing Full ½ beam spacing (Nyquist) Spectral resolution (unapodised) High 0.04 cm-1 (1.2 GHz) Medium 0.25 cm-1 (7.5 GHz) Low 1.0 cm-1 (30 GHz) Low+High (constant in frequency) 24 possibilities 42/58

Spectrometer SINGLE POINT: SPARSE Always get data from whole array SSW pixel (spacing = 33 ) SLW pixel (spacing = 51 ) 2 field 43/58

Spectrometer SINGLE POINT: SPARSE, INTERMEDIATE or FULL SPARSE 2 beam spacing SSW: 33 SLW: 51 2 field INTERMEDIATE (4pt) 1 beam spacing SSW: 16 SLW: 25 FULL (16pt) ½ beam spacing SSW: 8 SLW: 12 44/58

Spectrometer RASTER: INTERMEDIATE 3x3 deg SSW 3x3 deg SLW 4pt jiggle at each raster 45/58

Spectrometer RASTER: The raster map is made up from a combination of individual fields of view Raster direction is fixed to spacecraft axes not to sky coordinates check visualisation on different days! Coverage is a parallelogram on the sky Split into separate observations to make more complicated shapes 46/58

Z height Y Raster is performed in spacecraft coordinates Therefore orientation on the sky changes depending on source position & visibility constraints length Raster starts here 47/58

Raster starts here Raster is performed in spacecraft coordinates Therefore orientation on the sky changes depending on source position & visibility constraints Z height Y 48/58

Spectrometer Spectral resolution SMEC movement 49/58

Spectrometer point source spectrum LOW Δσ = 1.0 cm-1 (30 GHz); R = 52 15 Continuum measurements 36 (20+16) resolution elements across the whole range SSW resolution 1.0 cm-1 SLW overlap between bands 50/58

Spectrometer point source spectrum MEDIUM Δσ = 0.25 cm-1 (7.5 GHz); R=200 60 HIGH Δσ = 0.04 cm-1 (1.2 GHz); R=1290 370 Line spectroscopy Measurement of total integrated line fluxes (line widths 280 840 km/s in HIGH resolution mode) 51/58

High and Medium example 200 µm MEDIUM res x 150 MEDIUM res x 50 609 µm HIGH res x 30 HIGH res x 10 20 km/s line 200 µm (1499 GHz) 280 km/s (HIGH) 1810 km/s (INT) 609 µm (492 GHz) 850 km/s (HIGH) 5510 km/s (INT)

High+Low resolution Low resolution spectra are extracted from High resolution ones. 53/58

Spectrometer sensitivity Note that all sensitivities are quoted for a point source on axis at 200 µm Minimum times for each spectral resolution are (repetition=2) LOW (30 GHz) MEDIUM (7.5 GHz) HIGH (1.2 GHz) 26 sec 98 sec 266 sec 0.27 Jy RMS 0.55 Jy RMS 4.1 x 10-17 W/m2 0.27* Jy RMS 2.5 x 10-17 W/m2 HIGH+LOW 292 sec 0.19* Jy RMS 2.5 x 10-17 W/m2 Using the low resolution part in High res observations. 54/58

Why use FTS? The line sensitivity is good for broad lines (200 km/s) at low wavelengths (~200 µm). The full spectral range from 194 to 672 µm in one go. Always get a sparse map around the source. No wavelength calibration necessary. 55/58

Concluding remarks Offsets: for each bolometer at the beginning of an observation cannot be changed during an observation can lead to saturation for bright sources or strongly varying background The photometer is the primary instrument Be careful when setting constrained observation check visibility check observing efficiency Use concatenation/grouping whenever appropriate 56/58

Where to go from here Herschel Science Centre Web Pages: http://herschel.esac.esa.int Herschel Manuals + many other useful information and links. Register to Herschel and use the help-desk 57/58

The End 58/58