Dynamics of Salmonella Typhimurium shedding from early to peak lay in laying hens

Similar documents
COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Part A: Salmonella prevalence estimates. (Question N EFSA-Q ) Adopted by The Task Force on 28 March 2007

The effect of salinomycin on Salmonella, Campylobacter and the intestinal microflora in experimentally infected broiler chickens

2015 Salmonella survey of the Queensland egg production environment

Open Access RESEARCH ARTICLE. Pardeep Sharma, Vivek V. Pande, Talia S. Moyle, Andrea R. McWhorter and Kapil K. Chousalkar *

Bactericidal Effect of Several Chemicals on Hatching Eggs Inoculated with Salmonella serovar Typhimurium

(Question N EFSA-Q ) Adopted by The Task Force on 20 February 2007

Richard K. Gast 1 and Peter S. Holt

Part A: Salmonella prevalence estimates. (Question N EFSA-Q A) Adopted by The Task Force on 28 April 2008

Overview. Michelle D. Danyluk University of Florida. 4/14/14

Estimating the Public Health Impact of Setting Targets at the European Level for the Reduction of Zoonotic Salmonella in Certain Poultry Populations

NRL-Salmonella, Hungary. National Food Chain Safety Office Food and Feed Safety Directorate Erzsébet Adrián 29 May 2018

Risk Assessment of Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium perfringens in ready to eat Egg Products

Mechanisms of egg contamination by Salmonella Enteritidis

Fernando Leite, Connie Gebhart, Randall Singer, Richard Isaacson. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN

Thermo Scientific RapidFinder Salmonella species, Typhimurium, and Enteritidis PCR Kit AOAC- RI PTM Matrix Extension: Method Comparison Study

PROCESSING, PRODUCTS, AND FOOD SAFETY

Preliminary Report. Analysis of the baseline study on the prevalence of Salmonella in laying hen flocks of Gallus gallus

Salmonella monitoring data and foodborne outbreaks for 2015 in the European Union

Survival and Heat Resistance of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Peanut Butter

Industry Learning in Salmonella Control

UK National Control Programme for Salmonella in Layers (gallus gallus)

Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis based probiotic growth performance, fecal microbiota and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens

Typhoid Fever Dr. KHALID ALJARALLAH

CRISPR-SeroSeq: A Developing Technique for Salmonella Subtyping

Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella and Campylobacter contamination of poultry during transport and slaughter

Comparison of Media and Methods for Recovering Salmonella Typhimurium from Turkeys'

Review Article Application of Molecular Approaches for Understanding Foodborne Salmonella Establishment in Poultry Production

C.M. Harris*, S.K. Williams* 1. PhD Candidate Department of Animal Sciences Meat and Poultry Processing and Food Safety

Collaborators. Page 1 of 7

3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Salmonella Express System

Salmonella Prevalence in Turkey Flocks before and after Implementation of the Control Program in Germany

3 S. Heidelberg ESBL Extended spectrum lactamase

STUDY OF FREQUENCY OF SALMONELLA STRAINS ISOLATED FROM MEAT, MEAT PRODUCTS AND ORGANS

Comparison of five culture methods for Salmonella isolation from swine fecal samples of known infection status

Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers and its effects on gastrointestinal health and performance. Taryn Lee Halsey

Virulence of layer farm or egg associated Salmonella isolates

Scientific Opinion on a quantitative estimation of the public health impact of setting a new target for the reduction of Salmonella in broilers 1

Use of the 3M Molecular Detection System for Salmonella and Listeria spp.

ITALY TRENDS AND SOURCES OF ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS IN HUMANS, FOODSTUFFS, ANIMALS AND FEEDINGSTUFFS

Preventing Salmonella Colonization of Chickens. Electrostatic Application of Electrolyzed Oxidative Acidic Water

Scientific Opinion on an estimation of the public health impact of setting a new target for the reduction of Salmonella in turkeys 1

Networks. The Salmonella Network, a tool for monitoring Salmonella from farm to fork

Evaluation of non-pathogenic surrogate bacteria as process validation indicators

Project Title: Estimation of the area affected by animal feces in vegetable field under overhead sprinkle irrigation system

Tineke Jones Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lacombe Research Centre Lacombe, Alberta

method to produce eggs free from

Preventing Salmonella Colonization of Chickens. Electrostatic Application of Electrolyzed Oxidative Acidic Water

ANTIMICROBIAL TESTING. E-Coli K-12 - E-Coli 0157:H7. Salmonella Enterica Servoar Typhimurium LT2 Enterococcus Faecalis

Indicator Organisms SCI5508

NF VALIDATION Validation of alternative analytical methods Application in food microbiology. Summary report

hours from slaughter, even strictly anaerobe bacteria will find convenient conditions for multiplication. The thesis entitled Bacteriological,

Stories from the Frontline: Investigating causes of salmonellosis in Australia. Name of program

PCR- TTGE PCR (PCR-TTGE) PCR.

Line. Chickens. Health. Program. Nutrition. Program. SILO patented 1-Monoglycerides from C1 to C7 for treating animals. Patent n.

American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 2(2): , 2007 ISSN Science Publications

Bactericidal Activity of Organic Acids against Salmonella typhimurium Attached to Broiler Chicken Skin t

Influence of the probiotic strain Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 on experimental infections with Salmonella Enteritidis PT4 in chickens

Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78:K80 in poultry

Salmonella enteritidis Identification and Isolation

The effect of short-time microwave exposures on Salmonella typhimurium inoculated onto chicken drumettes

A pathogen is an agent or microrganism that causes a disease in its host. Pathogens can be viruses, bacteria, fungi or protozoa.

FOR RUMINANTS. kemin.com/guthealth

Gram negative bacilli

Scientific Opinion on a quantitative estimation of the public health impact of setting a new target for the reduction of Salmonella in laying hens 1

Development and Evaluation of Visual Biosensors for Rapid Detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Salmonella spp. in Fermented Pork Sausage (Nham)

Nottingham, Medical School, Queen s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham,

SAMPLING LEVELS AND FREQUENCY

Studies on Pathogenesis and Immunity to Turkey Clostridial Dermatitis. K.V. Nagaraja and Anil Thachil

Dr. habil. Anna Salek. Mikrobiologist Biotechnologist Research Associate

Pathogenic effects of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Typhimurium on sprouting and growth of maize

Fate of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium on Carrots and Radishes Grown in Fields Treated with Contaminated Manure Composts or Irrigation Water

Saolta University Health Care Group Galway University Hospital

Variable Colonization of Chickens Perorally Inoculated with Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and Subsequent Contamination of Eggs

3. INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC ZOONOSES AND ZOONOTIC AGENTS Salmonella. EU summary report on zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks 2011

Salmonella is one of the most common causes of food-borne

Natural Genetic Resistance to Infection

Temporal Effects of Lactic Acid Bacteria Probiotic Culture on Salmonella in Neonatal Broilers

International Perspectives on Food Safety Regulation. Industry responsibility for the food it produces

Salmonella in Food 2014

The emergence of a new phage type of Salmonella Typhimurium in humans and animals in New Zealand

Pr oject Summar y. Funded by The Beef Checkoff

THE IDENTIFICATION OF TWO UNKNOWN BACTERIA AFUA WILLIAMS BIO 3302 TEST TUBE 3 PROF. N. HAQUE 5/14/18

Outbreak of a new serotype Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, with antigenic formula 11:z 41 : e,n,z 15 in Greece :

Survey of the prevalence of Salmonella species on commercial laying farms in the United Kingdom

Fate of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in Apple Cider with and without Preservatives

A comparative study on the pathogenesis of egg contamination by different serotypes of Salmonella

Progress on the biocontrol of foodborne pathogens on leafy greens with non-pathogenic microbes

SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA

The two most common causes of

Romanian Biotechnological Letters Vol. 23, No. 2, Effect of uranium on the radiosensitivity of Salmonella spp. in pork meat

Assessment of the human-health impact of Salmonella in animal feed

Serotype and Phage Type Distribution of Salmonella Strains Isolated from Humans, Cattle, Pigs, and Chickens in The Netherlands from 1984 to 2001

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Estimating MU for microbiological plate count using intermediate reproducibility duplicates method

White Paper on Human Illness Caused by Salmonella from all Food and Non- Food Vectors

Received 15 October 1997/Returned for modification 20 November 1997/Accepted 12 May 1998

Short Communication. Evaluation of microbial contamination of feces and soil on a laying-hen farm depending on sampling site and season

THE TRANSMISSION AND TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS OPHTHALMIA OF CATTLE.

Transcription:

Dynamics of Salmonella Typhimurium shedding from early to peak lay in laying hens P. SHARMA*, V. PANDE, R. DEVON, A. MCWHORTER and K. K. CHOUSALKAR School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide, Australia *Corresponding author: pardeep.sharma@adelaide.edu.au Globally, Salmonella is a common cause of food-borne human gastroenteritis. It can be transmitted through consumption of contaminated eggs and chicken meat. In Australia, Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is the most frequently reported serovar in egg related food poisonings. The present experiment was conducted to study the shedding of S. Typhimurium definitive type 9 (DT9) in eggs and faeces of laying hens, challenged before onset of lay. In addition, the effects of co-infection on the shedding of DT9 were also investigated. At 14 weeks of age, hens were orally inoculated with 10 9 colony forming units (CFU) of either DT9 or a combination of Salmonella Mbandaka (S. Mbandaka) and DT9. Faecal samples were collected on day 1 post-infection (p.i.) followed by 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 weeks p.i.. All faecal samples were processed for enumeration of Salmonella by MPN (most probable number) method. All eggs laid during 6, 8, 10, 12 and 14 week p.i. were tested for Salmonella. Salmonella counts in faeces ranged from 1.53 ± 1.05 to 48.53 ± 16.55 MPN / g for birds infected with DT9 only and 0.78 ± 0.27 to 44.80 ± 18.30 MPN / g in the birds infected with DT9 and S. Mbandaka. The frequency of egg shell contamination ranged from 9.52 to 21.74 % for DT9 and 10.89 to 33.33 % in the co-infected group. Both groups had the highest rate of Salmonella shedding on egg shell at the onset of lay (6 weeks p.i.). Over the course of the experiment, Salmonella was not detected in egg internal contents in either group. The above findings suggest that there was intermittent and prolong shedding of Salmonella in the faeces and eggs. Keywords: Salmonella; laying hens; dynamics; shedding; eggs. Introduction Globally, salmonellosis is one of the most important public health hazards and food-borne zoonotic diseases. Egg and raw egg products are frequently linked to outbreaks of human salmonellosis. In Australia, Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) is the most frequently reported serovar in egg related food poisoning (EFSA, 2010). Salmonella enter the gastrointestinal tract by ingestion and establish persistent infection in the caeca (Barrow, 2000). Bird excreta along with environmental sources are main sources of Salmonella shedding. The persistence and extent of flock colonisation is dependent on several factors such as the bacterial strain, dose of initial inoculum, age, genetic line and immune status of the birds (Gast et al., 2005). At oviposition, 90% of eggs are free of bacteria (Board, 1966); however, egg shell surface contamination can occur during contact with any surface. Contaminated eggs are often responsible for the zoonotic transmission of Salmonella Enteritidis (Centers for Disease Control, 1996). Previous studies reported that an increase Salmonella shedding in faeces could increase the likelihood of eggshell contamination (Gole et al., 2014 a). Stress has a profound impact on immune response (El-Lethey et al., 2003) and laying stress can alter the immune response of birds, making them more susceptible to Salmonella infection, thus

increasing Salmonella shedding. Gole et al.(2014 b) conducted a study on a single age layer flock for detection of Salmonella shedding at the onset of lay and found the highest prevalence of Salmonella in faeces (82.14%) was at onset of lay (18 weeks). Studies conducted under field conditions by Chemaly et al. (2009) showed that 39.3% of Salmonella positive flocks had at least one positive eggshell (1.05%). However, there is a paucity of literature investigating dynamics of Salmonella Typhimurium shedding from the early to peak lay stage in the experimentally infected birds. The present experiment was conducted to characterise the shedding pattern of S. Typhimurium definitive type 9 (DT9) in eggs and faeces of laying hens, challenged before onset of lay. In addition effects of co-infection with S. Mbandaka, on the shedding of DT9 were also studied. Materials and methods Chickens: Fertile eggs were obtained from commercial Hyline brown layer parent flocks and were hatched in animal facilities. A total thirty two pullets were raised in pens up to week 10 and then divided in to three treatment groups consisting of control, Salmonella Typhimurium (T group) and S. Typhimurium + S. Mbandaka combination (MT group) and housed in individual cages in three separate positive pressure rooms for the duration of the experiment. Feed and water were sterilised and provided ad libitum. Strict biosecurity measures were maintained to ensure the birds remained free of Salmonella until inoculation and to avoid cross-contamination throughout the experiment. Feed, water and faecal samples were screened for Salmonella spp. fortnightly. Prior to infection, all experimental birds were negative for Salmonella spp. All the experiments were performed according to the Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes and approved by institutional animal ethics committee of The University of Adelaide. Bacterial inoculations: At 14 weeks of age, control birds received only sterile Luria Bertani (LB) broth, other hens were orally inoculated with 10 9 colony forming units (CFU) of either S. Typhimurium definitive type DT9 (T group) or a combination of S. Mbandaka and DT9 (MT group) suspended in LB broth (Oxoid Australia). Salmonella isolates used in this study were originally isolated from Australian layer farms Gole et al. (2014 b) and serotyped at Institute for Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, Australia. Faecal sampling for bacteriology and Most probable number (MPN): Faecal samples were collected aseptically from individual hen in Whirl- Pack plastic bags (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia) on day 1 post-infection (p.i.) followed by 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 weeks p.i.. All faecal samples were cultured for Salmonella isolation using previously described method Gole, et al. (2014 b) and processed for enumeration of Salmonella by MPN (most probable number) method as described earlier Pavic et al. (2010) and Santos et al. (2005). Bacteriological analysis of egg shell wash and internal contents: Eggs were collected bi-weekly from sixth week post infection (start of lay) and then on the alternate weeks till fourteen weeks p.i. from both the control and Salmonella infected hens. Each egg was collected in a separate sterile Whirl-Pak plastic bag to avoid cross-contamination and egg shell wash and internal egg contents were processed separately for Salmonella isolation as described previously Gole, et al.(2014 b). Statistical analysis: All MPN values were expressed as per gram of faeces and data was analysed statistically using two way ANOVA using SAS software 6.0 software. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results and discussion Salmonella populations and count in the faecal samples: Dynamics of Salmonella shedding for day1 p.i., followed by 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 week p.i. hens is presented in Figure 1. A total of 320 faecal samples were processed for the isolation and enumeration of Salmonella. None of the faecal samples from control hens were Salmonella positive. For both the S. Typhimurium (T group) and S. Typhimurium + S. Mbandaka combination (MT group), no significant difference (P > 0.05) in

MPN / g Salmonella populations was detected among the two treatment groups (Mean ± SE of 25.46 ± 4.09 and 20.90 ± 4.05 MPN/g for T and MT group, respectively) and no significant difference (P > 0.05) was found between weeks p.i.. The overall Salmonella counts in faeces ranged from 1.53 to 48.53 MPN / g of faeces for birds infected in T group only and 0.78 to 44.80 MPN / g in the birds infected in MT group. At one week p.i. hens showed highest MPN count which could be due to the early stage of the infection and a large number of bacteria in the intestine. After only a week p.i., the bacterial shedding of hens was reduced. Contrary to our findings, Marcq et al. (2011) reported reduction in Salmonella shedding at 22 days p.i. suggesting natural elimination of Salmonella Typhimurium from gut of broilers. At six weeks p.i. there was an increase in the MPN count which could be a result of stress and impaired immune response induced by onset of lay suggesting that laying stress has reactivated the bacteria. However further investigation is necessary to conclude these findings. The MPN count was increased on 12th, 14th and 16th week p.i. for the T group which indicated that Salmonella can persist in the intestinal tract of birds for a prolonged period of time. Similar findings were recorded by Gast et al. (1990) in experimentally infected hens. 60 50 40 30 20 T MT 10 0 0.1 1 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Weeks Post Infection Figure 1 Populations and Most Probable Number / g of faeces at different weeks post infection in Salmonella Typhimurium (T) and S. Typhimurium + S. Mbandaka (MT) in experimentally infected hens. Detection of Salmonella from egg shell wash and internal contents: A total of 895 egg samples were tested for Salmonella. None of the samples from control hens were Salmonella positive. The frequency of egg shell contamination ranged from 9.52 to 21.74% for T and 10.89 to 33.33% in MT group (Figure 2). Salmonella was isolated from the start of laying i.e. sixth week post infection (p.i.) to fourteenth week p.i. from the egg shell wash of experimentally infected hens of both T and MT group. The percentage of shell contamination was highest in both the groups at six week p.i. and lowest on eight week p.i.. Over the course of the experiment, Salmonella was not detected in egg internal contents of either group.

Per cent postive for Salmonella 35 30 25 20 15 10 T MT 5 0 6 8 10 12 14 Weeks post Infection Figure 2 Per cent eggshell surface contamination at different weeks post infection by Salmonella Typhimurium (T) and S. Typhimurium + S. Mbandaka (MT) in experimentally infected hens. Conclusion The findings of current study suggests that there was intermittent and prolong shedding of Salmonella in the faeces of laying hens along with highest egg shell contamination at the onset of lay. Throughout the experiment, Salmonella was not detected in egg internal contents in either group. Acknowledgement This research was conducted within the School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide and supported by Australian Egg Corporation Limited (AECL). Mr. Pardeep Sharma is an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship recipient. References BARROW, P.A. (2000) The paratyphoid salmonellae., Revue scientifique et technique 19: 351 375. BOARD, R.G. (1966) The course of microbial infection of the hen's egg. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 29: 319-341. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL (1996) Outbreaks of Salmonella serotype Enteritidis infection association with consumption of raw shell eggs-united States, 1994-1995. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 45:737-742. CHEMALY, M., HUNEAU-SALAUN, A., LABBE, A., HOUDAYER, C., PETETIN, I. and FRAVALO, P. (2009) Isolation of Salmonella Enterica in laying-hen flocks and assessment of eggshell contamination in France. Journal of Food Protection 72: 2071-2077. EFSA (2010) The community summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in the European Union in 2008. European Food Safety Authority 8: 1496. EL-LETHEY, H., HUBER-EICHER, B. and JUNGI, T. W. (2003) Exploration of stress-induced immunosuppression in chickens reveals both stress-resistant and stress-susceptible antigen responses. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 95: 91-101.

GAST, R.K. and BEARD, C.W. (1990) Production of Salmonella Enteritidis contaminated eggs by experimentally infected hens. Avian Diseases 34: 438-446. GAST, R.K., GUARD-BOULDIN, J. and HOLT, P.S. (2005) The relationship between the duration of fecal shedding and the production of contaminated eggs by laying hens infected with strains of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Heidelberg. Avian Diseases 49: 382-386. GOLE, V.C., TOROK, V., SEXTON, M., CARAGUEL, C.G.B. and CHOUSALKAR, K.K. (2014 a) Association between indoor environmental contamination by Salmonella Enterica and contamination of eggs on layer farms. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 52: 3250-3258. GOLE, V.C., CARAGUEL, C.G., SEXTON, M., FOWLER, C. and CHOUSALKAR, K.K. (2014 b) Shedding of Salmonella in single age caged commercial layer flock at an early stage of lay. International Journal of Food Microbiology 189: 61-66. MARCQ, C., COX, E., SZALO, I.M., THEWIS, A. and BECKERS, Y. (2011) Salmonella Typhimurium oral challenge model in mature broilers: bacteriological, immunological and growth performance aspects. Poultry Science 90:59-67. PAVIC, A., GROVES, P.J., BAILEY, G. and COX, J.M. (2010) A validated miniaturized MPN method, based on ISO 6579:2002 for the enumeration of Salmonella from poultry matrices. Journal of Applied Microbiology 109: 25-34. SANTOS, F., LI, X., PAYNE, J. and SHELDON, B. (2005) Estimation of most probable number Salmonella populations on commercial North Carolina turkey farms. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14: 700-708.