IGA Lecture I: Introduction to G-valued moment maps

Similar documents
The Based Loop Group of SU(2) Lisa Jeffrey. Department of Mathematics University of Toronto. Joint work with Megumi Harada and Paul Selick

Morse theory and stable pairs

On the holonomy fibration

LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

A LITTLE TASTE OF SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: THE SCHUR-HORN THEOREM CONTENTS

QUASI-HAMILTONIAN QUOTIENTS AS DISJOINT UNIONS OF SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

Flat connections on 2-manifolds Introduction Outline:

A little taste of symplectic geometry

Delzant s Garden. A one-hour tour to symplectic toric geometry

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds

Quantising proper actions on Spin c -manifolds

Real loci in symplectic manifolds Lisa Jeffrey Mathematics Dept., Univ. of Toronto

FORMULAS OF VERLINDE TYPE FOR NON-SIMPLY CONNECTED GROUPS

Hamiltonian Toric Manifolds

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

12 Geometric quantization

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

Geometry of the momentum map

Marsden-Weinstein Reductions for Kähler, Hyperkähler and Quaternionic Kähler Manifolds

Timothy E. Goldberg 1. INTRODUCTION

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Res + X F F + is defined below in (1.3). According to [Je-Ki2, Definition 3.3 and Proposition 3.4], the value of Res + X

ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS

LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP

Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour

A Convexity Theorem For Isoparametric Submanifolds

The Yang-Mills equations over Klein surfaces

LECTURE 4: SYMPLECTIC GROUP ACTIONS

Stratified Symplectic Spaces and Reduction

Nicholas Proudfoot Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403

Morse Theory and Applications to Equivariant Topology

An introduction to symplectic geometry

The Fundamental Gerbe of a Compact Lie Group

The symplectic structure on moduli space (in memory of Andreas Floer)

arxiv: v4 [math.sg] 22 Jul 2015

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 26 Jan 2015

V = 1 2 (g ijχ i h j ) (2.4)

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

Lecture on Equivariant Cohomology

A real convexity theorem for quasi-hamiltonian actions. Florent Schaffhauser

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

Singular Reduction of Generalized Complex Manifolds

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.sg] 19 Feb 2003

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Math. Res. Lett. 13 (2006), no. 1, c International Press 2006 ENERGY IDENTITY FOR ANTI-SELF-DUAL INSTANTONS ON C Σ.

DUISTERMAAT HECKMAN MEASURES AND THE EQUIVARIANT INDEX THEOREM

Contents. Preface...VII. Introduction... 1

A bundle-theoretic perspective to Kac Moody groups

Examples of Singular Reduction

Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

Geometry and Dynamics of singular symplectic manifolds. Session 9: Some applications of the path method in b-symplectic geometry

Linear connections on Lie groups

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

Cohomology of the Mumford Quotient

HAMILTONIAN TORUS ACTIONS IN EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY AND SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

BRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]).

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 14 Dec 1997

HAMILTONIAN ACTIONS IN GENERALIZED COMPLEX GEOMETRY

L (2) -COHOMOLOGY OF ORBIT SPACES

INSTANTON MODULI AND COMPACTIFICATION MATTHEW MAHOWALD

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MASLOV INDEX IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

A DANILOV-TYPE FORMULA FOR TORIC ORIGAMI MANIFOLDS VIA LOCALIZATION OF INDEX

Higher codimension CR structures, Levi-Kähler reduction and toric geometry

ON ALGEBRAIC ASPECTS OF THE MODULI SPACE OF FLAT CONNECTIONS

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Lectures on Lie groups and geometry

LECTURE 6: J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND APPLICATIONS

Bredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press

Instanton Floer homology with Lagrangian boundary conditions

Donaldson Invariants and Moduli of Yang-Mills Instantons

DERIVED HAMILTONIAN REDUCTION

MAPPING CLASS ACTIONS ON MODULI SPACES. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math 9 (2003),

Vortex Equations on Riemannian Surfaces

Log-Concavity and Symplectic Flows

EXISTENCE THEORY FOR HARMONIC METRICS

Instanton Floer homology with Lagrangian boundary conditions

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 13 Apr 2010

ERRATA FOR INTRODUCTION TO SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

POISSON-LIE T-DUALITY AND INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

The tangent space to an enumerative problem

COTANGENT MODELS FOR INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

LAGRANGIAN BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR ANTI-SELF-DUAL INSTANTONS AND THE ATIYAH-FLOER CONJECTURE. Katrin Wehrheim

On Singular Reduction of Hamiltonian Spaces

Monomial equivariant embeddings of quasitoric manifolds and the problem of existence of invariant almost complex structures.

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

The Poisson Embedding Problem

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.sg] 23 Nov 2005

Algebraic geometry over quaternions

GENERALIZING THE LOCALIZATION FORMULA IN EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY

Mapping class groups of surfaces and quantization

Transcription:

IGA Lecture I: Introduction to G-valued moment maps Adelaide, September 5, 2011

Review: Hamiltonian G-spaces Let G a Lie group, g = Lie(G), g with co-adjoint G-action denoted Ad. Definition A Hamiltonian G-space (M, ω, Φ) is a G-manifold M with ω Ω 2 (M) G and Φ C (M, g ) G satisfying 1 ι(ξ M )ω = d Φ, ξ, 2 dω = 0, 3 ker(ω) = 0.

Examples of Hamiltonian G-spaces Example Coadjoint orbits O g, with Φ the inclusion. Example G G T G = G g, with Φ(g, µ) = (Ad g µ, µ). Example G T G = G g, with Φ(g, µ) = (Ad g 1)(µ) Example U(n) C n, with Φ: C n u(n) the map Φ(z 1,..., z n ), A = 2πiz Az, A u(n).

Symplectic reduction Meyer-Marsden-Weinstein theorem Suppose (M, ω, Φ) is a Hamiltonian G-space, with 0 is a regular value of Φ. Then G acts locally freely on Φ 1 (0), and M /G = Φ 1 (0)/G is a symplectic orbifold. If 0 is a singular value, then M /G is a stratified symplectic space (Sjamaar-Lerman). More generally, for O a coadjoint orbit one defines M / O G = Φ 1 (O)/G = (M O ) /G.

There is an extensive theory relating the geometry of M /G to the equivariant geometry of M. Duistermaat-Heckman (symplectic volumes) Kirwan, Jeffrey-Kirwan (cohomology, intersection pairings) Guillemin-Sternberg ( quantization commutes with reduction ) Guillemin-Sternberg, Atiyah, Kirwan (convexity theory) Tolman-Weitsman Witten, Vergne, Paradan (non-abelian localization)

Gauge theory example (Atiyah-Bott) G a compact simply connected Lie group, invariant inner product on g = Lie(G). Σ = M(Σ) = {A Ω1 (Σ, g) da + 1 2 [A, A] = 0} gauge transformations

Motivation: Moduli Spaces of flat connections Construction of symplectic form, after Atiyah-Bott A(Σ) = Ω 1 (Σ, g) carries symplectic form ω(a, b) = Σ a b. C (Σ, G) acts by gauge action, g.a = Ad g (A) dg g 1, This action is Hamiltonian with moment map curv : A da + 1 2 [A, A] Moduli space is symplectic quotient M(Σ) = curv 1 (0)/C (Σ, G).

Moduli Spaces of flat connections The space M(Σ) = A(Σ) /C (Σ, G) is a compact singular symplectic space of dimension where h is the genus. dim M(Σ) = (2h 2) dim G, Since this reduction is infinite-dimensional, the standard techniques for symplectic quotients don t directly apply. But M(Σ) also has a nice finite-dimensional construction:

Moduli Spaces of flat connections Holonomy description of the moduli space M(Σ) = Hom(π 1 (Σ), G)/G = Φ 1 (e)/g where Φ: G 2g G (with g the genus of Σ) is the map Φ(a 1, b 1,..., a g, b g ) = g i=1 a i b i a 1 i b 1 i. a 2 b 1 a 2 b 2 a 1 b 1 a 1 b 2 a 1 b 2 a 2 b 1 We d like to view Φ as a moment map, and Φ 1 (e)/g as a symplectic quotient G 2h /G!

Group-valued moment maps θ L = g 1 dg Ω 1 (G, g) left-maurer-cartan form θ R = dgg 1 Ω 1 (G, g) right Maurer-Cartan form η = 1 12 [θl, θ L ] θ L Ω 3 (G) Cartan 3-form Definition (Alekseev-Malkin-M.) A q-hamiltonian G-space (M, ω, Φ) is a G-manifold M, with ω Ω 2 (M) G and Φ C (M, G) G, satisfying 1 ι(ξ M )ω = 1 2 Φ (θ L + θ R ) ξ, 2 dω = Φ η, 3 ker(ω) ker(dφ) = 0.

Comparison Hamiltonian G-space Φ: M g 1 ι(ξ M )ω = d Φ, ξ, 2 dω = 0, 3 ker(ω) = 0. q-hamiltonian G-space Φ: M G 1 ι(ξ M )ω = 1 2 Φ (θ L + θ R ) ξ, 2 dω = Φ η, 3 ker(ω) ker(dφ) = 0.

Examples: Coadjoint orbits, conjugacy classes Example Co-adjoint orbits Φ: O g are Hamiltonian G-spaces ω(ξ O, ξ O) µ = µ, [ξ, ξ ] Example Conjugacy classes Φ: C G are q-hamiltonian G-spaces ω(ξ C, ξ C) a = 1 2 (Ad a Ad a 1)ξ ξ

Examples; Cotangent bundle, double Example Cotangent bundle T G = G g (with cotangent lift of G G action) is Hamiltonian G G-space with Example Φ(g, µ) = (Ad g (µ), µ) The double D(G) = G G is a q-hamiltonian G G-space with action (g 1, g 2 ).(a, b) = (g 1 ag2 1, g 2bg1 1 ) moment map and 2-form Φ(a, b) = (ab, a 1 b 1 ) ω = 1 2 a θ L b θ R + 1 2 a θ R b θ L.

Examples; Cotangent bundle, double Example Cotangent bundle T G = G g (with cotangent lift of conjugation action) is Hamiltonian G-space with Φ(g, µ) = Ad g (µ) µ Example The double D(G) = G G is a q-hamiltonian G-space, with G acting by conjugation and Φ(a, b) = aba 1 b 1.

Examples: Planes and spheres Example Even-dimensional plane C n = R 2n is Hamiltonian U(n)-space. Example Even-dimensional sphere S 2n is a q-hamiltonian U(n)-space (Hurtubise-Jeffrey-Sjamaar). Similar examples with G = Sp(n), and M = H n resp. (Eshmatov). HP(n)

Basic constructions: Products Products: If (M 1, ω 1, Φ 1 ), (M 2, ω 2, Φ 2 ) are q-hamiltonian G-spaces then so is Example (M 1 M 2, ω 1 + ω 2 + 1 2 Φ 1θ L Φ 2θ R, Φ 1 Φ 2 ). For instance, D(G) h = G 2h is a q-hamiltonian G-space with moment map Φ(a 1, b 1,..., a h, b h ) = h i=1 a i b i a 1 i b 1 i.

Basic constructions: Reduction Reduction: If (M, ω, Φ) is a q-hamiltonian G-space then the symplectic quotient C 1 C 2 C 3 M /G := Φ 1 (e)/g is a symplectic manifold. with singularities Example (and Theorem) The symplectic quotient G 2h C 1 C r /G = M(Σ r h ; C 1,..., C r ) is the moduli space of flat G-bundles over a surface with boundary, with boundary holonomies in prescribed conjugacy classes.

Basic constructions: Exponentials exp: g G exponential map, h: Ω (g) Ω 1 (g) standard homotopy operator (dh + hd = id) ϖ = h(exp η) Ω 2 (g) exp η = dϖ. Exponentials: If (M, ω 0, Φ 0 ) is a Hamiltonian G-space, such that exp regular on Φ 0 (M) g, then is a q-hamiltonian G-space. Example (M, ω 0 Φ 0ϖ, exp(φ 0 )) If exp regular on O g = g, this construction gives C = exp(o).

Notation: Weyl chambers and Weyl alcoves Notation G compact and simply connected (e.g. G = SU(n)), T a maximal torus in G, t = Lie(T ), t + = t fundamental Weyl chamber, A t + t fundamental Weyl alcove t + A 0 0 {ξ ker(ad ξ ) = t} {ξ ker(e ad ξ 1) = t}

Moment polytope For every ν g there is a unique µ t + with ν G.µ. Theorem (Atiyah, Guillemin-Sternberg, Kirwan) For a compact connected Hamiltonan G-space (M, ω, Φ), the set (M) = {µ t + µ Φ(M)} is a convex polytope. For every g G there is a unique ξ A with g G. exp(ξ). Theorem (M-Woodward) For any connected q-hamiltonian G-space (M, ω, Φ), the set (M) = {ξ A exp(ξ) Φ(M)} is a convex polytope.

Examples of moment polytopes (due to C. Woodward) A multiplicity-free Hamiltonian SU(3)-space A multiplicity-free q-hamiltonian SU(3)-space

Application to eigenvalue problems The Hamiltonian convexity theorem gives eigenvalue inequalities for sums of Hermitian matrices with prescribed eigenvalues. (Schur-Horn conjecture; solved by Klyachko). The q-hamiltonian convexity theorem gives eigenvalue inequalities for products of unitary matrices with prescribed eigenvalues. (Agnihotri-Woodward).

Kirwan surjectivity H. Cartan theorem: For G M, H G (M, R) = H(Ω G (M), d G ) where Ω G (M) = (Sg Ω(M)) G, (d G α)(ξ) = dα(ξ) ι(ξ M )α(ξ). Theorem (Kirwan) Let (M, ω, Φ) be a Hamiltonian G-space, with 0 regular value of Φ. Then the natural map is surjective. H G (M, R) H G (Φ 1 (0), R) = H(M /G, R) For q-hamiltonian spaces, H G (M, R) H G (Φ 1 (e), R) = H(M /G) is not surjective in general.

Kirwan surjecticity Assume G simple, 1-connected. η i Ω 2d i 1 (G) G, i = 1,..., l s.t. H(G) = ([η 1 ],..., [η l ]), ηg i Ω2d i 1 G (G) G equivariant extensions. Put Ω G (M) := Ω G (M)[u 1,..., u l ], where deg(u i ) = 2d i 2. Theorem (Bott-Tolman-Weitsman, Alekseev-M) dg = d G + ηg i u i For a compact q-hamiltonian G-space (M, ω, Φ), with e a regular value of Φ, the natural map is surjective. H G (M) H G (Φ 1 (e)) = H(M /G)

Hamiltonian LG-spaces G compact, simply connected; metric on g, LG = Map(S 1, G) loop group, Lg = Map(S 1, g), Lg = Ω 1 (S 1, g) with LG acting by gauge action: g.µ = Ad g (µ) g θ R. Definition A Hamiltonian LG-spaces is an LG-Banach manifold M with a weakly symplectic form σ Ω 2 (M) LG and an equivariant map Ψ C (M, Lg ) such that σ(ξ M, ) + dψ, ξ = 0. Note that Ψ is equivariant relative to an affine-linear action on Lg.

Hamiltonian LG-spaces Example (Coadjoint LG-orbits) The coadjoint orbits O Lg are Hamiltonian LG-spaces, with symplectic form ω(ξ Lg (µ), ξ Lg (µ)) = (d + ad(µ))ξ, ξ.

Hamiltonian LG-spaces Example (Moduli spaces) Σ surface with boundary Σ = S 1. G(Σ) = Map(Σ, G) A(Σ) = Ω 1 (Σ, g), Moment map: A (curv(a), i Σ A) Ω2 (Σ, g) Ω 1 ( Σ, g). G(Σ, Σ) := ker(g(σ) LG) Then M(Σ) = A(Σ) /G(Σ, Σ) = curv 1 (0)/G(Σ, Σ) is a Hamiltonian LG-space with Ψ([A]) = i Σ A.

Relation with Hamiltonian LG-spaces Theorem (Alekseev-Malkin-M) There is a 1-1 correspondence between Hamiltonian LG-manifolds (M, σ, Ψ) with proper moment map Ψ: M Lg, compact q-hamiltonian G-manifolds (M, ω, Φ). Examples of this correspondence: M = O Lg M = C G, M = M(Σ 1 h ) M = D(G)h = G 2h.

Relation with Hamiltonian LG-spaces The direction of the correspondence is Φ: M = M/L 0 G G = Lg /L 0 G. However, σ Ω 2 (M) LG is not L 0 G-basic! Fact: The pull-back of η Ω 3 (G) under Lg G = Lg /L 0 G has a distinguished invariant primitive ϖ Ω 2 (Lg ) LG. With this 2-form, σ Ψ ϖ is basic, and descends to ω.

Relation with Hamiltonian LG-spaces Another perspective (Cabrera-Gualtieri-M 2011): Specify Lg = Ω 1 L 2 (S 1, g), LG = Map H 1(S 1, G). Then Lg G is a (Banach) principal L 0 G-bundle. Riemannian metric on Lg gives principal connection. By pull-back, M M = M/L 0 G carries a connection. The horizontal projection of σ is basic, and descends to ω.