SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY LECTURE

Similar documents
SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY LECTURE

Microscopic Properties of BCS Superconductors (cont.)

MAJORANAFERMIONS IN CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS

Anthony J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign

7.4. Why we have two different types of materials: conductors and insulators?

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ

Chapter 2 Superconducting Gap Structure and Magnetic Penetration Depth

Quantum statistics: properties of the Fermi-Dirac distribution.

Fermions in the unitary regime at finite temperatures from path integral auxiliary field Monte Carlo simulations

TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM COMPUTING IN (p + ip) FERMI SUPERFLUIDS: SOME UNORTHODOX THOUGHTS

Physics 127a: Class Notes

In chapter 3, when we discussed metallic bonding, the primary attribute was that electrons are delocalized.

Lecture 6. Fermion Pairing. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY LECTURE

Landau-Fermi liquid theory

221B Lecture Notes Quantum Field Theory II (Fermi Systems)

Superconductivity and the BCS theory

Lecture notes on topological insulators

Landau s Fermi Liquid Theory

Physics 127c: Statistical Mechanics. Weakly Interacting Fermi Gas. The Electron Gas

5. Superconductivity. R(T) = 0 for T < T c, R(T) = R 0 +at 2 +bt 5, B = H+4πM = 0,

BCS-BEC Crossover. Hauptseminar: Physik der kalten Gase Robin Wanke

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

arxiv:cond-mat/ v1 4 Aug 2003

Critical Behavior I: Phenomenology, Universality & Scaling

Superfluid 3 He. Miguel A. Morales

in-medium pair wave functions the Cooper pair wave function the superconducting order parameter anomalous averages of the field operators

Is a system of fermions in the crossover BCS-BEC. BEC regime a new type of superfluid?

Chemistry 431. Lecture 23

Critical Behavior II: Renormalization Group Theory

COOPER PAIRING IN EXOTIC FERMI SUPERFLUIDS: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH

We already came across a form of indistinguishably in the canonical partition function: V N Q =

Phase transitions and finite-size scaling

V. FERMI LIQUID THEORY

9.1 System in contact with a heat reservoir

Luigi Paolasini

Ginzburg-Landau Theory: Simple Applications

Quantum Phase Transition

Physics 127b: Statistical Mechanics. Lecture 2: Dense Gas and the Liquid State. Mayer Cluster Expansion

Ginzburg-Landau length scales

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY LECTURE

Lecture 4 Recap: normal metals and the clectron-phonon interaction *

Collective Effects. Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Physics

Physics 607 Final Exam

Recent Developments in Holographic Superconductors. Gary Horowitz UC Santa Barbara

arxiv:cond-mat/ v2 [cond-mat.supr-con] 6 Jun 2005

Heavy quarkonium physics from Euclidean correlators

International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS) - Volume-1, Issue-8,November 2015 ISSN:

Toward a unified description of equilibrium and dynamics of neutron star matter

SSH Model. Alessandro David. November 3, 2016

Localized states near the Abrikosov vortex core in type-ii superconductors within zero-range potential model

Hydrodynamics and QCD Critical Point in Magnetic Field

SPACETIME FROM ENTANGLEMENT - journal club notes -

Lecture 10: Condensed matter systems

Quantum Mechanics FKA081/FIM400 Final Exam 28 October 2015

J10M.1 - Rod on a Rail (M93M.2)

Pseudospin Magnetism in Graphene

N independent electrons in a volume V (assuming periodic boundary conditions) I] The system 3 V = ( ) k ( ) i k k k 1/2

Light-Cone Quantization of Electrodynamics

Lecture 4: Basic elements of band theory

Topological insulator part I: Phenomena

CH.11. VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLES. Continuum Mechanics Course (MMC)

Lecture 4: Nuclear Energy Generation

Holography on the Horizon and at Infinity

Lecture 11: Long-wavelength expansion in the Neel state Energetic terms

C/CS/Phy191 Problem Set 6 Solutions 3/23/05

2. As we shall see, we choose to write in terms of σ x because ( X ) 2 = σ 2 x.

Physics 607 Exam 2. ( ) = 1, Γ( z +1) = zγ( z) x n e x2 dx = 1. e x2

Brief historical introduction. 50th anniversary of the BCS paper. Richardson exact solution (1963) Ultrasmall superconducting grains (1999).

Radiating Dipoles in Quantum Mechanics

PHYS 5012 Radiation Physics and Dosimetry

The Ising model Summary of L12

Absorption cross section of RN black hole

Luigi Paolasini

NTNU Trondheim, Institutt for fysikk

Landau-Fermi liquid theory

Chapter 17 The bilinear covariant fields of the Dirac electron. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

QFT at finite Temperature

The boundary state from open string fields. Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba. March 9, 2009 at Nagoya

Mean Field and Ginzburg-Landau Analysis of Two-Band Superconductors

Supplementary Figure 3: Interaction effects in the proposed state preparation with Bloch oscillations. The numerical results are obtained by

Signatures of Superfluidity in Dilute Fermi Gases near a Feshbach Resonance

d 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)

Identical Particles. Bosons and Fermions

Chapter 19 - Second Quantization. 1. Identical Particles Revisited

Structure of Generalized Parton Distributions

Clusters and Percolation

Chapter 6 Free Electron Fermi Gas

Shigeji Fujita and Salvador V Godoy. Mathematical Physics WILEY- VCH. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA

Examples of Lifshitz topological transition in interacting fermionic systems

Power Series. Part 1. J. Gonzalez-Zugasti, University of Massachusetts - Lowell

8.821 F2008 Lecture 12: Boundary of AdS; Poincaré patch; wave equation in AdS

MTLE-6120: Advanced Electronic Properties of Materials. Intrinsic and extrinsic semiconductors. Reading: Kasap:

Application of Mean-Field Jordan Wigner Transformation to Antiferromagnet System

Fermi Liquid and BCS Phase Transition

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

Electrical conduction in solids

21 Lecture 21: Ideal quantum gases II

Some detailed information for BCS-BEC Crossover

Transcription:

Lecture 7 SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY LECTURE 7 017 Anthony J. Leggett Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA and Director, Center for Complex Physics Shanghai Jiao Tong University

BCS theory T 0 Recap: at T = 0 the structure of the MBWF is SJTU 7.1 Ψ = Φ, Φ = u 00 > + υ 11 and the specific values of u and υ were found by minimizing Η μν. For T 0 we expect intuitively that the description of the many-body system can still be factored into a product of descriptions of the occupation of the individual pair states, : technically ρ = ρ density matrix but now (a) all 4 occupation states will be realized with some probability (b) quantities lie Δ will be T dependent (c) at some T c ~ T = 0 Τ B the collective bound state will cease to exist.

Recall: for given, 4 occupational states 00, 11, 01, 10 SJTU 7. GP EP BP 1 BP and ground state has ψ = u 00 + υ 11 corresponding to σ H = ε z + Δ x with an energy E H ε + Δ 1Τ. The limit Δ 0 corresponds to the normal GS, and then E ε. So the energy of the ground pair state relative to the normal ground state is E GP = ε E. The EP ( excited pair ) state is formed by simply reversing the pseudospin, so that ψ,ep = υ 00 u 11 (orthogonal to ψ,gf ) This evidently costs an energy E, so E EP = ε + E What about the BP ( broen pair ) states BP 1,? These each correspond (relative to the N ground state) to inetic energy KE ε and zero PE (no partner to scatter!), hence E BP1, = ε Thus the relative energies of the various states are E BP E GP = E, E EP E GP = E

Conventional language: SJTU 7.3 State BP 1 BP has Bogoliubov quasiparticle in state ; state ΕΡ has quasiparticles in both and (hence E EP = Ε BP ). ( : but ΕΡ is really an excitation of the condensate whereas BP 1, are not). Population of states: since all 4 states distinguishable, simple MB-Gibbs statistics applies, i.e. P n exp βe n. Thus (taing E GP as zero of E) P GP = Z 1, P BP 1 = P BP = Z 1 exp βe, P EP = Z 1 exp βe E E T Z = 1 + exp βe + exp βε A quantity of special interest is F T 1 σ x T = Τ Δ T E P GP P EP = Δ T /E T tanhβe T / Putting this into the equation Δ T = V 0 F T we find Δ T = V 0 Δ T /E T tanhβe Τ T or in the more general case V 0 V 1 Δ T = V Δ T ΤE T tanhβe T Τ Finite-temperature BCS gap equation

As T increases from 0, Δ T decreases from Δ 0 to zero at a temperature T c given by the linearized equation SJTU 7.4 Δ T c = V Δ T c Τ E tanhβ c E Τ β c Τ 1 B T c For the BCS contact potential V V 0 this yields ε c tanhβ ετ Ν 0 V 1 o = න dε = ln 1 14β ε c ε c 0 so comparing this with zero-t gap equation we have Ν 0 V o 1 = ln(ε c /Δ T = 0) Δ T = 0 = 1.76 B T c reasonably well satisfied for most classical superconductors Examination of the gap equation at arbitrary T < T c shows that it is a function only of Τ T T c Δ T = 1.76 B T c f T/T c with f z 1 z 4 Τ 1 (so for T T c, T 1 Τ T T c Τ 1 )

Properties of a BCS superconductor at non zero T. SJTU 7.5 A. Condensate: As we saw, the (F.T. of the) condensate wave function has the form at T 0 F T = T /E T )tanhβe Τ T so, in the wave function N 0 න dε sin r r F r = F expi r Δ T ε + Δ T 1Τ tanh β ε + Δ 1Τ the low energy cutoff (which determines the long distance behavior) gradually changes from ~Δ T = 0 to ~ B T. Since for T T c these are of same order of magnitude, we have approximately F r: T Δ T N 0 sin Fr F r exp rτξ T where ξ T ~ξ 0. i. e., Cooper-pair radius is not sharply T-dependent (in particular, does not diverge for T T c from below). The number of Cooper pairs, N c T න F r: T dr is proportional to T, hence for T T c N c T 1 Τ T T c

B. The Normal Component SJTU 7.6 Condensate is very inert, e.g. cannot be spin-polarized or (usually) flow in a way determined by walls. This applies both to GP and EP states (both have S = 0, COM momentum = 0). Hence such responses determined entirely by BP states. However, response is not simply proportional to the probability of occupation of BP states: Ex: Pauli spin susceptibility In field H, ΔΕ = μ B H. Hence, does not affect 00 or 11, but i real spin not pseudospin! shifts energies of BP states, S i z ΔE BP1 = μ B H, ΔE BP = +μ B H Hence: P BP1 = exp β Ε μ B H, P BP = exp β Ε K + μ B H and M z μ B S z = μ B Z 1 (exp β Ε μ B H exp β Ε + μ B H. with Z H = Z 0 + 0 H

For μ 8 H B T, T this gives M z = μ d B H de and so exp βe SJTU 7.7 Z = μ B Hβ sech β E Τ χ Μ z Τ H = μ dn B β dε 0 sech Τ βe dε In the normal state E ε this correctly gives χ = μ B Τ dn dε, so χ T χ n = β න sech βe T Τ dε 0 Yosida function Τ χ χ 1 Note: Reason argument is relatively simple is that energy eigenstates and carry a spin + 1Τ ( 1Τ) respectively T T c

Ƹ SJTU 7.8 The normal density The normal density is defined as the fraction of the electrons which can respond to a (transverse) static vector potential, in following sense: In presence of vector potential Α r p p eα r So KE becomes i p i eα r i m i and the current density j r is pƹ i m e m pƹ i Α + Α r i m (ignore the order of operators) j r = 1 i δ r r i pƹ i eα r i Τm + H. C. We already saw that the explicit term in A(r i ) gives rise in the S phase, to the Meissner effect. But in the normal phase it is cancelled by the response of pƹ i to the perturbation p i Α r i. Τ δj δα pert = + Ne m

So: in S phase at 0 < T < T c what is perturbative response of p to Α? SJTU 7.9 (almost) exact analogy to calculation of spin susceptibility: 00 and 11 have total P = 0, so cannot respond 10 has momentum p = ħ, 01 has p = ħ. Hence ΔE BP1 = eħ Total induced momentum is AΤm ΔE BP = +eħ AΤm 1 P = ħ Z exp β E eħ A m exp β E + eħ A m and for ħ A B T, T this reduces to J e P m e ħ F 3m A Z 1 d exp βe de e p F 3m β sech βe Τ A directional averaging In N state E ε this correctly reduces to Ne Τm, so ratio ( ρ n Τρ )of response in S state at temperature T to N state value is ρ n Τρ = β න 0 sech Τ βe dε Yosida function χ and ρ n Τρ are untypically simple, because energy eigenstates are also eigenstates of σ and p.

Summary of lecture 7 SJTU 7.10 At T 0 the BCS description is still a product over the different pair states,, but now all four states GP u 00 + v 11 BP1 10 BP 01 EP v 00 u 11 are populated, and u and v are functions of T. The relative energies of the 4 states are E BP T E GP T = E T E EP T E GP T = E T The self-consistent equation for the gap is Δ T = E T ε + Δ T 1/ V Δ T /E T tanh βe T / and has a nontrivial Δ 0 solution only for T < T c, where B T c = Δ T = 0 /1.76 Condensate wave function F r: T not strongly T-dependent: no. of Cooper pairs N c T ~Δ T, near T c ~ 1 T/T c Normal component is essentially BP states: contributes to simple quantities χ, P n an amount Y T, e.g. β χ T / χ n = Y T β න sech βe T / dε 0