MICROLITE AND STIBIOTANTALITE FROM TOPSHAM, MAINE. Cuenr.Bs P.qracun' eno F. A. Gouvnn, H arvard LI niaer sity, C ambridge, M as s'

Similar documents
IVAR OFTEDAL and P. CHR. SÆBO

Fro. 2. Fibrous brucite in vein of chrysotile asbestos, Asbestos, Quebec. Pr,ern I. Frc. 1. Photograph of fibrous brucite from Asbestos, Quebec.

CONTEMPORANEOUS CRYSTALLIZATION OF BERYL AND ALBITE VS. REPLACEMENT. B. M. Snauv, Smith College, Northampton, Mass.

QUARTZ CRYSTALS OCCURRING IN GYPSUM

Sedimentation & Stratigraphy. Lab 3: Heavy Mineral Analysis Using the Franz Magnetic Separator

SOME RECENT ACCESSIONS TO THE MINERAL COLLEC-

Prismatic cleavage and steep rhombohedral form in s-quartz.

Lab 4: Mineral Identification April 14, 2009

AUGELITE FROM MONO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Dwrcnr M. LBulroN, Stanford, Llniaersity, California.

DIELECTRIC CONSTANTS OF CRYSTALS III BY D. A. A. S. NARAYANA RAO

TH E AMERICAN M IN ERALAGIST

True Gems: Origins and Identification

EESC 4701: Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology IGNEOUS MINERALS LAB 1 HANDOUT

Tnn AuERTcAN M rnerar,ocrsr

Matter and Minerals. Earth 9 th edition Chapter 3 Minerals: summary in haiku form "Mineral" defined: natural, inorganic, solid (and two more).

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

Minerals and Rocks. Minerals

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

Copyright SOIL STRUCTURE and CLAY MINERALS

Biaxial Minerals This document last updated on 27-Oct-2014

300 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

Plagioclases from Sultan Hamud, Kenya.

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC NOTES : CRISTOBALITE, STEPHANITE, NATROLITE Josnrrr Munnocu, Uniaersity of CatiJorni,a, Los Angeles.

OLIVINES, PYROXENES, AND AMPHIBOLES PLEOCHROISM, INTERFERENCE COLORS AND EXTINCTION ANGLES

ESS 439 Lab 2 Examine Optical Properties of Minerals

X-RAY INVESTIGATION OF FBRRIERITE, A ZEOLITE. Lroyp W. Sr,tpros, (Jniaersity of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon. Ansrnect

Minerals: Building Blocks of Rocks Chapter 2. Based on: Earth Science, 10e

LAB 2: SILICATE MINERALS

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT. BUREAU OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS. RECORDS.

Chapter 4 Minerals Sec. 4.1 What is a Mineral?

INTRODUCTION TO THE PETROGRAPHIC MICROSCOPE AND RELIEF, BECKE LINE, AND OBLIQUE ILLUMINATION

Matter and Minerals Earth: Chapter Pearson Education, Inc.

Minerals II: Physical Properties and Crystal Forms. From:

DATA FOR SOME AFRICAN COLUMBITE-TANTALITE SPECIMENS

Rocks & Minerals. Lesson 1 Properties of Minerals. What is a mineral? What is a mineral?

305 ATOMS, ELEMENTS, AND MINERALS

Examining Minerals and Rocks

Name Petrology Spring 2006 Igneous rocks lab Part II Hand samples of igneous rocks Due Tuesday 3/7

Mineral Properties and Identification

Phenakite: an Elusive Pegmatite Mineral by Bob Carnein

The effect of isomorphous substitutions on the intensities of (OO1) reflections of mica- and chlorite-type structures.

Minerals. [Most] rocks are [mostly] made of minerals, so identification and interpretation depends on recognizing

GY-343 Petrology Petrographic Microscope Laboratory

Atoms: Building Blocks of Minerals. Why Atoms Bond. Why Atoms Bond. Halite (NaCl) An Example of Ionic Bonding. Composition of Minerals.

Geology Topics Minerals

OCEAN/ESS 410. Lab 8. Igneous rocks

X-ray determination of centrosymmetry in three felspars. 1

Sorosilicates, Colors in Minerals (cont), and Deep Earth Minerals. ESS212 January 20, 2006

Name: NAME PROPERTY 1 PROPERTY 2. Specimen #41: Specimen #42: (ASK!) Specimen #43: Specimen #44: Tuesday Wednesday (circle lab day)

MINERALS Smith and Pun Chapter 2 ATOMIC STRUCTURE

Irregularly developed crystals of Zircon (sp. gr. 4"0) from Ceylon.

2. REPLACEMENT OF PRIMARY PLAGIOCLASE BY SECONDARY K-FELDSPAR AND MYRMEKITE

A Pleochroic Variety of Gem Labradorite From the Rabbit Hills Area, Lake County, Oregon*

Silicates. The most common group of minerals forming the silicate Earth

EFFECTS OF DIKES AND DISPLACEMENT MOVEMENTS ON SEDIMENTS IN CAPITAN QUADRANGLE, NEW MEXICO

The Use of Minerals. Chapter 3

FIG. I.--Upper side, showing pittings. (Two-fifths actual size.)

Igneous petrology EOSC 321

Johannes H. Schellekens. Department of Geology, University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez, Jaime Rafael Rosario

What do these products have in common?

Solids / Crystal Structure

OF TSUMEBITE LnunBNcB LaFonen, H arvar d. U niaer sity, C ombrid. ge, M as s. CRYSTALLOGRAPHY

WELCOME TO GEOLOGY 333

ENVI.2030L - Minerals

Chapter 4. Diamonds are forever EARTH MATERIALS: MINERALS AND ROCKS. covalent bonds. ionic bonds of sodium chloride transfer or. exchange of electrons

Foundation Unit A.M. THURSDAY, 20 May hour

THE UNMIXING OF CHALCOPYRITE FROM SPHALERITE N. W. Buoncen, Massachuselts Institute oj Technology.

The Rock Cycle KitTM

124 TH E A M ERICA N M I N ERA LOGI ST

Earth Materials: Minerals and Rocks Chapter 4

Rnrnnnxcrs NOTES AND NEWS

A mineral is a- In order for a substance to be called a mineral, it must have of the characteristics described in this definition.

LAB 5: COMMON MINERALS IN IGNEOUS ROCKS

Giant Crystals from Maine

How 2 nd half labs will work

Gemstones, in particular rubies, Gemstones: Origin Determination

ee.7s% AND LORENZENITE ANALYSIS OF RAMSAYITE Tu. G. Seraua, Insti,tute oj Geol,ogy, Geochemi.cal' Laboratory, U ni.aer sity oj E el,si.nki, Fi,nland..

CH 4- MINERALS OBJECTIVES: Identify characteristics and formations of minerals. Differentiate Minerals by their groups and uses STANDARDS:

INTRODUCTION ROCK COLOR

THE OCCURRENCE OF ZINNWALDITE IN CORNWALL

Phenacite and other minerals from Ge~zan East Africa.

Minerals. [Most] rocks are [mostly] made of minerals, so identification and interpretation depends on recognizing

NOTE ON DETERMINATION OF OPTIC AXIAL ANGLE AND EXTINCTION ANGLE IN PIGEONITES. F. J. TunNrn, [Jniters'ity oj Otago, Dunedin, I{ew Zealond.

Minerals: Minerals: Building blocks of rocks. Atomic Structure of Matter. Building Blocks of Rocks Chapter 3 Outline

Name. GEOL.3250 Geology for Engineers Igneous Rocks

Mineral - a naturally occurring, inorganic solid that has a crystalline structure and a definite chemical composition For the Love of God

SECTION 5: THIN SECTIONS

Physical Geology 101 Laboratory MINERALS I Properties, Classification and Identification

Mineral Identification

Al2Mg5Si30O6(0H)8, lead to a monoclinic unit of structure with a = 5.2-

CHAPTER 3.3: METAMORPHIC ROCKS

GEOL FORENSIC GEOLOGY ROCK IDENTIFICATION

Be a mineral expert - 2 Identifying minerals using action tests - streak, density, hardness, acid test

Rare and Unusual Minerals from the Petaca Pegmatite District of New Mexico. Michael N. Spilde, Brian L. Salem, Steve Dubyk and William P.

Fun with Asbestos 1. Table 1: Asbestos Minerals. Mineral Asbestos Variety Mineral Group Comments. monoclinic amphibole. monoclinic amphibole

Tektosilicates- Feldspar Group Min XIVa

12. MYRMEKITE IN THE SANTA ROSA MYLONITE ZONE, PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA

Rocks: Mineral Mixtures

Weathering and Clast Production Geol 113

Transcription:

MICROLITE AND STIBIOTANTALITE FROM TOPSHAM, MAINE Cuenr.Bs P.qracun' eno F. A. Gouvnn, H arvard LI niaer sity, C ambridge, M as s' In a paper by the senior author (193a) describing the minerals found in a topaz pegmatite in Topsham, there occurs the following statement: "In the pocket, gahnite is associated with albite' In the lower portions nearly every block of albite that was broken showed a band of scattered minute crystals of emerald-green gahnite about half an inch beneath the free surface of the block. They must have been deposited simultaneously for a very short time while the albite was still growing and when this zone was the surface zone. In vugs of the albite, octahedrons or flat distorted hexagonal plates of gahnite reach a maximum dimension of one inch." Ftc. 1. Two views of a microlite crystal showing pseudohexagonal distortion- The facts of this statement were correct except that the mineral reported as gahnite is now known to be microlite. The mistake was perhaps a natural one for large crystals of dark green gahnite had been found in the same quarry outside the pocket, and when these minute green octahedrons appeared they were assumed, without special examination, to be of the same species. In the course of a study of the Topsham mineral series made in the Harvard Mineralogical Laboratory by Mr. G. W' Stewart, it was found that this assumption was a mistake' Since microlite is a sufficiently rare mineral to deserve record whenever found, the analysis and description of this occurrence is here presented. With few exceptions the Topsham microlite is green, a color not before recorded for this mineral. It varies from dull grass green in the larger crystals to vivid emerald green in the smaller transparent crystals' The dominant form of the crystals is octahedral with an occasional narrow

412 CIIARLES PALACHE AND F. A. GONYER face of the dodecahedron. There are, however, numerous extreme distortions which give the appearance of a hemimorphic hexagonal crystal. One of these was photographed and is shown in Fig. 1. The largest crystal is one half of an octahedron an inch on an edge; it is implanted on sericite with an irregular bounding surface. The study of several hundred specimens from the pocket revealed the following associations of microlite: 1. Enclosed in albite as described in the quotation. 2. Minute crystals embedded in topaz crystals without apparent relation to crystal boundaries of the latter. 3. Enclosed in lepidolite crystals; always a single layer of minute octahedrons rather widely but regularly spaced and arranged parallel to three or more of the bounding pseudoprism faces of the mica. 4. In sharp crystals at a boundary between quartz and lepidolite. 5. Implanted on tourmaline needles. 6. Encrusted with stibiotantalite crystals-a single specimen of minute size. 7. Microlite is often coated with sericite. All of these associations are in harmony with its having formed late in the period of pocket filling; all of the minerals listed were deposited on free surfaces towards the end of deposition. Where enclosed in another mineral it always appeared as if the microlite were deposited for a short time on a free surface to be afterwards covered over by later growth of the host mineral. There was no evidence that could be seen favoring deposition by replacement. Since the high density of this microlite was the property which first led to its proper identification, special care was devoted to this determination. Table 1 contains the record of the observations made on selected fragments with the microbalance and reveals figures which are in part much higher than any hitherto reported. They are believed to be justified by the discussion of the *-ray study which follows. Tanr,n 1. Spncrnrc Gnavrrv ol Mrcnor,trE No. of Observations Locality Specilic Gravity Berman 2 4 6 3 3 z Topsham, Me. Topsham, Me. Topsham, Me. Amelia Courthouse, Va. Newry, Me Embudo, N. Mex. green green dark brown amber yellow pale yellow glassy pale yellow glassy 6.4r 6.42+.04 6.36+.03 6 05+.01 5.85+.12 5.90

MICROLITE AND STIBIOTANT'ALITE FROM MAINE 413 The index of refraction il.uawo"s determined by Dr. Richmond as 2.023 +0.003, a somewhat higher figure than has been previously reported. Both density and refractive index probably reflect the low water content of this microlite. The new determinations of density for microlite from other localities given in Table 1 confirm the usual lower densities previously found; the lower values will probably be found, when analyses are available, to be due to a general higher water content. X-ray study. The x-ray powder picture is very sharply defined. The edge of the unit cell, calcuiated from this photograph by Prof. Shaub, is 10.39+0.01A. This figure agrees closely with previous determinations made by Reuning (1933) and Bjlrlykke (1934) on microlite of lower density. Hence the density variations would seem to be closely dependent on compositional variations and not on variation in cell dimension. The cell contains 8 molecules oi XzZzOs(O, O11) with a total molecular weight ol 4259, according to the analytical results which follow, and a calculated specific gravity oi 6.27. Chemistry. The chemical analysis was made by the junior author on several grams of selected clear green fragments without visible impurity. He followed the method of Hillebrand and Lundell. The results of the analysis, as shown in the following table, indicate a tantalum-rich sample of microlite with an unusually low water content. The discussion is by Dr. Berman and leads to a formula in agreement with Machatschki's n932) earlier work on minerals of the same type. TazOr CbzOr WOr SnOr CaO Mso UOr Y:O; CezO: NazO KzO Hro Tl.ll-n 2. AN.r.r,vsrs ol 1. 74.27 3.56 o.17 1.61 15 03 0.07 o.77 0.35 o26 3.37 0.41 027 N{tcnorrre, Tolsualr, Mn. ZJ.336 14.631.027 1.18t._...o4lto"".oo1.011.181.268 11.681.002.0e l.003.131.003.13117.oo2.oe I.109 4.75.00e.3eJ.030 1.31 26 A 74.67 3.50 t.70 14.33 0.54 0.78 3.49 1.00 Total 100.14 G 6.41 Molecular Weight t.289 0:56.08 100.00 6.265 4259.38 1. Analysis by F. A. Gonyer 2. Atomic ratios.

414 CHARLES PALACHE AND F. A. C,ONYER 3. Atoms per unit cell with Vd/A:4358 (from the x-ray data). 4. Calculated composition for XzZzOe(O,OH) with X:Car 36Nae 6n(Y,Ce) 63U 61 Z:Tat oocbo 11Sns e6 &nd(o:oh):0 41:0.59 In column 3 of this table the agreement with the theoretical formula 8[X22206(0,OE)] is shown. The X and Z atoms are somewhat in excess and the number of oxygen atoms is in excellent agreement. Column 4 is the calculated composition, with the atoms found in the analysis adjusted to conform with the formula. The simple Ca,I{a microlite must contain equal atomic proportions of 1y'o and (OI1) in order to conform with the valence requirements. fn this instance, however, the valence adjustments are somewhat more complex because Sz, a quadrivalent atom, substitutes for some of the quinquevalent Tain the Z pa,rt oi the formulal in the X part not only does 1y'o substitutelor Ca but also the rare earths which are trivalent, and a small amount of U, which is hexavalent. All of these substitutions lead to a net requirement of 0.59 (OH) in the formula, or 1.00 per cent of H2O in the analysis. The most serious discrepancy is in the water, but by the method of calculation the errors in other parts of the analysis are thrown into this figure. Brown m'icrolite. fn masses of the albite which lined the topaz pocket at Topsham there were observed occasional brown spots, at the center of each of which could be seen a tiny blackish crystal. Examination in the laboratory shows that these crystals are octahedrons, more or less distorted by intergrowth with the platy albite. The fracture i; conchoidal and shows a resinous lustre. The powder under the microscope is quite transparent and of a rather brownish-yellow color. Similar crystals were later found in one or two specimens of lepidolite; these were perfectly symmetrical octahedrons with narrow to broad truncations by the dodecahedron. The maximum diameter was ] inch. The density of these dark crystals was determined by Mr. on three different samples. As shown in Table 1, the specific gravity is 6.36, nearly as high as that of the green microlite. Closely associated with the dark microlite are a few small crystals of columbite. Stibiotantalite.In the list of paragenetic relations, mention is made of stibiotantalite. The specimen referred to is one of the two that were found at Topsham, each very small. Notwithstanding this relatively unimportant occurrence, it seems worthwhile to add some note upon it, since stibiotantalite has hitherto been found in America only at Mesa Grande, California. The specimen, about half a square centimeter in area, consists of a crystal of microlite, one surface of which is coated with albite, a little sericite and about 30 tiny crystals of stibiotantalite. The pale gray to

MICROLITE AND STIBIOTANTALITE FROM MAINE 415 brownish crystals are about 1 mm. long and.3 mm. in greater diameter. Most of them are implanted by one end of the c-axis and show a single prism and a pyramid which are the forms g(i30) and u(4'12'9) of Penfield and Ford (1906). The pinacoidal cleavage is perfect and truncates the thin edge of the prism. Penfield and Ford (1906), who were the first to describe crystals of stibiotantalite, were convinced that this mineral was isomorphous with columbite; they therefore assigned to the principal forms complex indices whereby the elements were brought inlo a rather remote correspondence with those of columbite. They showed that stibiotantalite was hemimorphic with respect to the direction of the a-axis, that is normal to the perfect cleavage. ungemach (1909) was the next author to describe crystals of this mineral. He denied the relationship to columbite on purely chemical grounds; took the principal forms as unit formsl and, in order to follow ordinary convention, placed the hemimorphic axis vertical, that is he made the cleavage basal. The strongest zone of stibiotantalite with five prisms and two pinacoids is the zone [001] of Penfield and Ford, which in Ungemach's position becomes [010]. With present usage this zone should be retained as [001], but the principal prism and pyramid should be unit forms as suggested by Ungemach. Our choice of position therefore is a third alternative, with Penfield and Ford's axes o and b interchanged and their form (4.12.9) made (111). The transformation formulae relating these three positions are the following: Penfield-Ford to Ungemach 0+0/00+/+00 Penfield-Ford to Palache o+o/+oo/oo+ Ungemach to Palache 100 /001/010 The elements of stibiotantalite as given by Ungemach are: a:b:c :0.8879: li2.l2g6. The work of Dihlstrcim (1933) confirms this axial ratio. He found the unit cell to have the dimensions (/0:4'916A, bo: 5.542A, co : 11.78A ; or aoi b otco : 0.888 : : 2.126' There are four molecules ol SbTaOE in the unit cell, and in our position the space group symbol is Pcn. Recalculated to Palache's position, the elements become aib i c : 0.4169 : 1 : 0.4696. The Topsham crystals show no evidence of hemimorphism or twinning. The faces are dull and give poor reflections but could be identified as the unit forms. Figure 2 illustrates their form. In this position perfect

416 CHARLES PALACHE AND F. A. GONYER Frc. 2. Crystal of stibiotantalite. cleavage is parallel to (010) and the b axis is the axis of hemimorphism. The following angle table has been calculated from penfield,s measurements with slight emendation of his elements. The form list follows Ungemach (1909) with correction of two mistakes of transformation made by him and recurring in Goldschmidt' s Atlas, 8, 85. Since no angle table has been published for stibiotantalite, one is presented here, based on the measurements of Penfield and Ford. Tesrn 3. ANcr,r Taero or SrrsroreNrerrrp-SbTaO, Orthorhombic ; heminorphic-m2ma:bic:0.+769 :7:0.4696; fr:qo:rt:7.1261:o 4696:l Qr:h: pt:o 4169:08878:1 i n'.pz'.qz:2.1295:2.3986:l Forms,b p:c (r pr:a,bz pz:b c 001 0"00' 90'00' D 010 0"00, 90 00 90 00 q 190 14 55+ 90 00 90 00 p r7o 7 150 n 13O 1855 9000 9000 2537+ 9000 9000 3838+ 9000 9000 90'00' 90"00, 90.00, 9000 000 7s 04+ 0 00 14 55; 71 05 64 22+ sl 21+ 000 1855 0 00 2s 37+ 0 00 38 38+ m 7r0 67 22 90 00 90 00 22 38 11 012 0 00 13 13 13 13 90 00 e Or1 0 00 25 09+ 25 09i 90 00 000 6722 90 00 7647 90 00 64 s0+ h T d o32 0 00 35 09+ 35 09+ 021 0 00 69 55 69 55 101 90 00 48 24 0 00 9000 9000 5450; 9000 9000 2005 4136 4136 9000 w l1r 67 22 50 40 25 09+ 44 26+ r 133 38 s8+ 31 01 25 09+ 71 t4+ y 132 38 38+ 42 03 35 09+ 65 16+ 4136 7241 6925 66 16 6036+ 5827+ c r7r 18 55 73 56+ 73 0s 71 5l 41 36 24 37 The identity of the Topsham stibiotantalite was further established by optical and density determinations. The specific gravity was deter-

MICROLITE AND STIBIOTANTALITE FRAM MAINE 4r7 mined with the microbalance on 3.5 mg. of fragments as 6.57. This figure is intermediate to the two determinations made by Penfield and Ford on two samples, 6.299 Lo 6.818. The optical properties were compared by Dr. Berman with those of material from Mesa Grande and were found to be qualitatively the sarne. Exact measurements were not made, however. RBlunnNcrs Byfnr,vxrr, H., Norwegische Mikrolithmineralien: Norsk. Geol. Tid'sks., 14' 145-161 0e34). Dtrr-srnciM, K., Uber den Bau des wa,hren Antimontetroxyds und des damit isomorphen Stibiotantalits, SbTaOa: Zeits. anorg. gfusrn:.r2391 57 64 (1938). Mecuatscnrr, F., Die Pyrochlor-Romeitegruppe: Cbemie d'er Erile,7, 56-76 (1932). Prt-r.cse, C., A topaz deposit in Topsham, Maine: Am. J our. 9ci.,27, 3748 (1934). PrNlrnro, S. t., and Fon-o, W. E., On stibiotantalite: Am. Jour. Sci'.,22r 6t (1906). R.nur.nNG. 8.. Microlithvarietaten von Donkerhuk Siidwestafrika: Chetnie tler Erile,8, 18G2r7 (r9s3). Uncnuacu, H., Sur la stibiotantalite', BuIt, soc. mirt. Fr,32,92 (1909).