Random subgroups of a free group

Similar documents
Free groups, Lecture 2, part 1

First Midterm Examination

Convert the NFA into DFA

Minimal DFA. minimal DFA for L starting from any other

CS 310 (sec 20) - Winter Final Exam (solutions) SOLUTIONS

Computing with finite semigroups: part I

Linear Inequalities. Work Sheet 1

Coalgebra, Lecture 15: Equations for Deterministic Automata

Lecture 08: Feb. 08, 2019

Surface maps into free groups

Finite-State Automata: Recap

Generating finite transformation semigroups: SgpWin

Symbolic enumeration methods for unlabelled structures

Homework 3 Solutions

Regular expressions, Finite Automata, transition graphs are all the same!!

CS415 Compilers. Lexical Analysis and. These slides are based on slides copyrighted by Keith Cooper, Ken Kennedy & Linda Torczon at Rice University

Speech Recognition Lecture 2: Finite Automata and Finite-State Transducers. Mehryar Mohri Courant Institute and Google Research

First Midterm Examination

CHAPTER 1 Regular Languages. Contents

Bases for Vector Spaces

Infinitely presented graphical small cancellation groups

Chapter 2 Finite Automata

CSCI 340: Computational Models. Kleene s Theorem. Department of Computer Science

Converting Regular Expressions to Discrete Finite Automata: A Tutorial

CS 275 Automata and Formal Language Theory

Lexical Analysis Finite Automate

Java II Finite Automata I

Chapter Five: Nondeterministic Finite Automata. Formal Language, chapter 5, slide 1

a,b a 1 a 2 a 3 a,b 1 a,b a,b 2 3 a,b a,b a 2 a,b CS Determinisitic Finite Automata 1

NFAs continued, Closure Properties of Regular Languages

Harvard University Computer Science 121 Midterm October 23, 2012

Fingerprint idea. Assume:

NFAs continued, Closure Properties of Regular Languages

GNFA GNFA GNFA GNFA GNFA

Grammar. Languages. Content 5/10/16. Automata and Languages. Regular Languages. Regular Languages

p-adic Egyptian Fractions

CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture #31: What DFA s Can and Can t Do David Mix Barrington 9 April 2014

CS103B Handout 18 Winter 2007 February 28, 2007 Finite Automata

Farey Fractions. Rickard Fernström. U.U.D.M. Project Report 2017:24. Department of Mathematics Uppsala University

Automata Theory 101. Introduction. Outline. Introduction Finite Automata Regular Expressions ω-automata. Ralf Huuck.

Speech Recognition Lecture 2: Finite Automata and Finite-State Transducers

Types of Finite Automata. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Comparing DFAs and NFAs. Comparing DFAs and NFAs (cont.) Finite Automata 2

Formal Languages and Automata

Finite Automata Theory and Formal Languages TMV027/DIT321 LP4 2018

Closure Properties of Regular Languages

CS 301. Lecture 04 Regular Expressions. Stephen Checkoway. January 29, 2018

CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages

Finite Automata-cont d

Lecture 9: LTL and Büchi Automata

Types of Finite Automata. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Comparing DFAs and NFAs. NFA for (a b)*abb.

1 Nondeterministic Finite Automata

12.1 Nondeterminism Nondeterministic Finite Automata. a a b ε. CS125 Lecture 12 Fall 2016

Thoery of Automata CS402

AUTOMATA AND LANGUAGES. Definition 1.5: Finite Automaton

Review of Gaussian Quadrature method

Table of contents: Lecture N Summary... 3 What does automata mean?... 3 Introduction to languages... 3 Alphabets... 3 Strings...

CS 330 Formal Methods and Models Dana Richards, George Mason University, Spring 2016 Quiz Solutions

The area under the graph of f and above the x-axis between a and b is denoted by. f(x) dx. π O

Three termination problems. Patrick Dehornoy. Laboratoire de Mathématiques Nicolas Oresme, Université de Caen

CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing

Assignment 1 Automata, Languages, and Computability. 1 Finite State Automata and Regular Languages

We will see what is meant by standard form very shortly

Chapter 1, Part 1. Regular Languages. CSC527, Chapter 1, Part 1 c 2012 Mitsunori Ogihara 1

Regular Expressions (RE) Regular Expressions (RE) Regular Expressions (RE) Regular Expressions (RE) Kleene-*

Nondeterminism and Nodeterministic Automata

A negative answer to a question of Wilke on varieties of!-languages

Worked out examples Finite Automata

CSCI 340: Computational Models. Transition Graphs. Department of Computer Science

4.1. Probability Density Functions

Connected-components. Summary of lecture 9. Algorithms and Data Structures Disjoint sets. Example: connected components in graphs

Homework Solution - Set 5 Due: Friday 10/03/08

Designing finite automata II

On the Hanna Neumann Conjecture

5. (±±) Λ = fw j w is string of even lengthg [ 00 = f11,00g 7. (11 [ 00)± Λ = fw j w egins with either 11 or 00g 8. (0 [ ffl)1 Λ = 01 Λ [ 1 Λ 9.

Compiler Design. Fall Lexical Analysis. Sample Exercises and Solutions. Prof. Pedro C. Diniz

The Minimum Label Spanning Tree Problem: Illustrating the Utility of Genetic Algorithms

Tutorial Automata and formal Languages

CM10196 Topic 4: Functions and Relations

1. For each of the following theorems, give a two or three sentence sketch of how the proof goes or why it is not true.

CHAPTER 1 Regular Languages. Contents. definitions, examples, designing, regular operations. Non-deterministic Finite Automata (NFA)

Hybrid Control and Switched Systems. Lecture #2 How to describe a hybrid system? Formal models for hybrid system

Parse trees, ambiguity, and Chomsky normal form

2.4 Linear Inequalities and Interval Notation

Pavel Rytí. November 22, 2011 Discrete Math Seminar - Simon Fraser University

ɛ-closure, Kleene s Theorem,

Model Reduction of Finite State Machines by Contraction

State space systems analysis (continued) Stability. A. Definitions A system is said to be Asymptotically Stable (AS) when it satisfies

Formal languages, automata, and theory of computation

Regular Language. Nonregular Languages The Pumping Lemma. The pumping lemma. Regular Language. The pumping lemma. Infinitely long words 3/17/15

Math 4310 Solutions to homework 1 Due 9/1/16

STRUCTURE OF CONCURRENCY Ryszard Janicki. Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1 Canada

12.1 Nondeterminism Nondeterministic Finite Automata. a a b ε. CS125 Lecture 12 Fall 2014

CS 330 Formal Methods and Models

Continuous Random Variables Class 5, Jeremy Orloff and Jonathan Bloom

CS103 Handout 32 Fall 2016 November 11, 2016 Problem Set 7

Automaton groups and complete square complexes

Chapter 6 Continuous Random Variables and Distributions

Bayesian Networks: Approximate Inference

Genetic Programming. Outline. Evolutionary Strategies. Evolutionary strategies Genetic programming Summary

Recitation 3: More Applications of the Derivative

Transcription:

Rndom sugroups of free group Frédérique Bssino LIPN - Lortoire d Informtique de Pris Nord, Université Pris 13 - CNRS Joint work with Armndo Mrtino, Cyril Nicud, Enric Ventur et Pscl Weil LIX My, 2015

Introduction Any group is isomorphic to quotient group of some free group. Study of lgeric properties of free groups y comintoril methods Grphicl representtion of sugroups : Stllings grphs Comintoril interprettion of prmeters or properties like the rnk, mlnormlity, Whitehed minimlity,... Quntittive study of finitely generted sugroups of free group nd nlysis of relted lgorithms

Introduction Any group is isomorphic to quotient group of some free group. Study of lgeric properties of free groups y comintoril methods Grphicl representtion of sugroups : Stllings grphs Comintoril interprettion of prmeters or properties like the rnk, mlnormlity, Whitehed minimlity,... Quntittive study of finitely generted sugroups of free group nd nlysis of relted lgorithms

I. Free Group

Free group : definition A group F is free if there is suset A of F such tht ny element of F cn e uniquely written s finite product of elements of A nd their inverses. The crdinlity of A is the rnk of the free group. Aprt from the existence of inverses no other reltion exists etween the genertors of free group. Bsic properties The sugroups of free group re free (Nielsen-Schreier Theorem). A free group with finite rnk contins sugroups with ny countle rnk.

Free group : definition A group F is free if there is suset A of F such tht ny element of F cn e uniquely written s finite product of elements of A nd their inverses. The crdinlity of A is the rnk of the free group. Aprt from the existence of inverses no other reltion exists etween the genertors of free group. Bsic properties The sugroups of free group re free (Nielsen-Schreier Theorem). A free group with finite rnk contins sugroups with ny countle rnk.

Free group : definition A group F is free if there is suset A of F such tht ny element of F cn e uniquely written s finite product of elements of A nd their inverses. The crdinlity of A is the rnk of the free group. Aprt from the existence of inverses no other reltion exists etween the genertors of free group. Bsic properties The sugroups of free group re free (Nielsen-Schreier Theorem). A free group with finite rnk contins sugroups with ny countle rnk.

Free groups nd reduced words Let A e finite lphet nd F = F(A) e the free group over A. The elements of F(A) re uniquely represented y the reduced words over A A 1 where A 1 = { 1 A}, A word is reduced if it does not contin fctors of the form 1 Exmples : 1 1 1 is reduced, 1 1 cc 1 is not reduced Reduction of word : replce in ny order ll occurrences of 1 y the empty wordǫ. Exmple : 1 1 cc 1 = 1 cc 1 = cc 1

Free groups nd reduced words Let A e finite lphet nd F = F(A) e the free group over A. The elements of F(A) re uniquely represented y the reduced words over A A 1 where A 1 = { 1 A}, A word is reduced if it does not contin fctors of the form 1 Exmples : 1 1 1 is reduced, 1 1 cc 1 is not reduced Reduction of word : replce in ny order ll occurrences of 1 y the empty wordǫ. Exmple : 1 1 cc 1 = 1 cc 1 = cc 1

Free groups nd reduced words Let A e finite lphet nd F = F(A) e the free group over A. The elements of F(A) re uniquely represented y the reduced words over A A 1 where A 1 = { 1 A}, A word is reduced if it does not contin fctors of the form 1 Exmples : 1 1 1 is reduced, 1 1 cc 1 is not reduced Reduction of word : replce in ny order ll occurrences of 1 y the empty wordǫ. Exmple : 1 1 cc 1 = 1 cc 1 = cc 1

Free groups nd reduced words Let A e finite lphet nd F = F(A) e the free group over A. The elements of F(A) re uniquely represented y the reduced words over A A 1 where A 1 = { 1 A}, A word is reduced if it does not contin fctors of the form 1 Exmples : 1 1 1 is reduced, 1 1 cc 1 is not reduced Reduction of word : replce in ny order ll occurrences of 1 y the empty wordǫ. Exmple : 1 1 cc 1 = 1 cc 1 = cc 1

Free groups nd reduced words Let A e finite lphet nd F = F(A) e the free group over A. The elements of F(A) re uniquely represented y the reduced words over A A 1 where A 1 = { 1 A}, A word is reduced if it does not contin fctors of the form 1 Exmples : 1 1 1 is reduced, 1 1 cc 1 is not reduced Reduction of word : replce in ny order ll occurrences of 1 y the empty wordǫ. Exmple : 1 1 cc 1 = 1 cc 1 = cc 1

Finitely generted sugroups We re interested in finitely generted free sugroups, i.e., otined from finite set of genertors. Finitely generted free sugroups cn e represented in unique wy y finite grph clled its Stllings grph (Stllings 1983). This description is very useful, some properties of the sugroup cn e directly otined from its grph representtion. A 1st gol To study lgeric properties of finitely generted sugroups of free group with comintoril methods.

Finitely generted sugroups We re interested in finitely generted free sugroups, i.e., otined from finite set of genertors. Finitely generted free sugroups cn e represented in unique wy y finite grph clled its Stllings grph (Stllings 1983). This description is very useful, some properties of the sugroup cn e directly otined from its grph representtion. A 1st gol To study lgeric properties of finitely generted sugroups of free group with comintoril methods.

Finitely generted sugroups We re interested in finitely generted free sugroups, i.e., otined from finite set of genertors. Finitely generted free sugroups cn e represented in unique wy y finite grph clled its Stllings grph (Stllings 1983). This description is very useful, some properties of the sugroup cn e directly otined from its grph representtion. A 1st gol To study lgeric properties of finitely generted sugroups of free group with comintoril methods.

Stllings foldings Let Y = { 1 1, 2 1, 3 1 1 }. Gol Build directed grph representing the free sugroup generted y Y First step Build directed cycle leled with 1 1 the first element of Y 1 1 i

Stllings foldings Let Y = { 1 1, 2 1, 3 1 1 }. Gol Build directed grph representing the free sugroup generted y Y First step Build directed cycle leled with 1 1 the first element of Y 1 1 i

Stllings foldings Second step Build from the sme vertex i directed cycle leled with 2 1 the second element of Y. 1 1 1 i

Stllings foldings Third step Build from the sme vertex i directed cycle leled with 3 1 1 the third nd lst element of Y. 1 1 1 i 1 1

Stllings foldings Forml inverses Reverse ll edges leled y 1 re nd replce their lel y. i

Stllings foldings Foldings to otin determinism nd codeterminism Apply s mny times s possile the following rules of merging (or folding) : The result does not depend on the order in which the trnsformtions re performed.

Stllings foldings - 1st folding i i

Stllings foldings - 2nd folding i i

Stllings foldings - 3rd folding A i B B A i

Stllings foldings - 4th folding i i

Stllings foldings - Lst folding nd Stllings grph i The Stllings grph representing the free sugroup generted y Y = { 1 1, 2 1, 3 1 1 }. i

Stllings grphs : definition The grph (with distinguished vertex i) otined is Stllings grph. Stllings grph It is deterministic nd co-deterministic : ech letter cts like prtil injection on the set of sttes. it is connected ll ut the distinguished stte i hve degree t lest two Unicity of the representtion A Stllings grph represents in unique wy finitely generted sugroup of the free group generted y the lphet of the lels.

Stllings grphs : definition The grph (with distinguished vertex i) otined is Stllings grph. Stllings grph It is deterministic nd co-deterministic : ech letter cts like prtil injection on the set of sttes. it is connected ll ut the distinguished stte i hve degree t lest two Unicity of the representtion A Stllings grph represents in unique wy finitely generted sugroup of the free group generted y the lphet of the lels.

Stllings grphs : definition The grph (with distinguished vertex i) otined is Stllings grph. Stllings grph It is deterministic nd co-deterministic : ech letter cts like prtil injection on the set of sttes. it is connected ll ut the distinguished stte i hve degree t lest two Unicity of the representtion A Stllings grph represents in unique wy finitely generted sugroup of the free group generted y the lphet of the lels.

Stllings grphs exmples of use One cn check whether (reduced) word elongs the sugroup or not. Check if there exists cycle leled y the word eginning in i One cn compute sis nd the rnk of the sugroup rnk = E ( V 1) To otin sis, choose spnning tree of the Stllings grph. Ech edge e tht is not in the tree corresponds to genertor of the se : the lel of cycle eginning in i using e nd edges in the spnning tree. One cn check whether the sugroup hs finite index or not. All letters ct like permuttions on the set of vertices

Stllings grphs exmples of use One cn check whether (reduced) word elongs the sugroup or not. Check if there exists cycle leled y the word eginning in i One cn compute sis nd the rnk of the sugroup rnk = E ( V 1) To otin sis, choose spnning tree of the Stllings grph. Ech edge e tht is not in the tree corresponds to genertor of the se : the lel of cycle eginning in i using e nd edges in the spnning tree. One cn check whether the sugroup hs finite index or not. All letters ct like permuttions on the set of vertices

Stllings grphs exmples of use One cn check whether (reduced) word elongs the sugroup or not. Check if there exists cycle leled y the word eginning in i One cn compute sis nd the rnk of the sugroup rnk = E ( V 1) To otin sis, choose spnning tree of the Stllings grph. Ech edge e tht is not in the tree corresponds to genertor of the se : the lel of cycle eginning in i using e nd edges in the spnning tree. One cn check whether the sugroup hs finite index or not. All letters ct like permuttions on the set of vertices

Exmple for the rnk The Stllings grph of the sugroup genrted y Y = { 1 1, 2 1, 3 1 1 } : Therefore{ 2 1, 1 1 } is sis of the sugroup nd the rnk is 2. i

Stllings grphs lgorithmic point of view Stlling foldings cn e computed in O(n log n) where n is the totl length of the genertors. The lgorithm due Touikn (2006) mkes use of Union nd Find. The intersection (resp. union) of two sugroups cn e computed in time nd spce O(n 1 n 2 ) where n 1 (resp. n 2 ) is the size (here the numer of vertices) of the first (resp. second) Stllings grph.

II. Distriutions on Sugroups

A grph-sed distriution on sugroups A rndom sugroup is given y choosing uniformly t rndom Stllings grph of size n Studied y Bssino, Nicud, Weil (2008, 2013, 2015) Wht does the Stllings grph of such rndom sugroup look like? FIGURE: A rndom sugroup with 200 vertices for the grph-sed distriution (The lphet is of size 2).

The clssicl word-sed distriution on sugroups A rndom sugroup is given y choosing rndomly nd uniformly k genertors of length t most n, where k is fixed Studied y Gromov (1987), Arzhntsev nd Ol shnskiǐ (1996), Jitsukw (2002),... Wht does the Stllings grph of such rndom sugroup look like? FIGURE: A rndom sugroup for the word-sed distriution with 5 words of lengths t most 40 (The lphet is of size 2.)

A word-sed distriution (few genertors) Fix the numer k of genertors nd the mximl length n of ech genertor. Consider the uniform distriution over the k-tuples of reduced words of length t most n. Let R n the numer of reduced words of length n, R n = 2r(2r 1) n 1 The length of word in rndom k-tuple is ner to n.

A word-sed distriution (few genertors) Fix the numer k of genertors nd the mximl length n of ech genertor. Consider the uniform distriution over the k-tuples of reduced words of length t most n. Let R n the numer of reduced words of length n, R n = 2r(2r 1) n 1 The length of word in rndom k-tuple is ner to n.

A word-sed distriution (few genertors) Length, prefixes nd suffixes Let 0 < α < 1. A reduced word in R n hs length greter thnαn with proility tht tends towrd 1 when n tends towrd+. Let 0 < β < α/2. A k-uple of reduced words of R n is such tht the prefixes of lengthβn of ll words nd their inverses re pirwise distinct with proility tht tends towrd 1 when n tends towrd+. Consequence Ech of the k reduced words hs n outer loop of length t lest n(α 2β) with proility tht tends to 1 when n tends to+.

A grph-sed distriution : Proilistic results Theorem (Bssino, Nicud, Weil 2008) The proility for rndom r-tuple of prtil injections of size n to form Stllings grph tends towrd 1 when n tends towrd +. Stllings grph It is deterministic nd co-deterministic : ech letter cts like prtil injection on the set of sttes. The proof it is connected ll ut the distinguished stte i hve degree t lest two is study of prtil injections siclly uses the sddle-point method

A grph-sed distriution : Proilistic results Theorem (Bssino, Nicud, Weil 2008) The proility for rndom r-tuple of prtil injections of size n to form Stllings grph tends towrd 1 when n tends towrd +. Stllings grph It is deterministic nd co-deterministic : ech letter cts like prtil injection on the set of sttes. The proof it is connected ll ut the distinguished stte i hve degree t lest two is study of prtil injections siclly uses the sddle-point method

A grph-sed distriution : Proilistic results Theorem (Bssino, Nicud, Weil 2008) The proility for rndom r-tuple of prtil injections of size n to form Stllings grph tends towrd 1 when n tends towrd +. Stllings grph It is deterministic nd co-deterministic : ech letter cts like prtil injection on the set of sttes. The proof it is connected ll ut the distinguished stte i hve degree t lest two is study of prtil injections siclly uses the sddle-point method

A grph-sed distriution : Prtil injections A prtil injection cn e seen s set of cycles nd of non-empty sequences. Set(Cycle or non-empty Sequences) With the symolic method : I(z) = n 0 I n n! zn = exp ( log With the sddle point method : I n n! e 2 π e2 1 1 z + z ) = 1 1 z 1 z ez/(1 z) 1 2 n n 1 4

A grph-sed distriution : Prtil injections A prtil injection cn e seen s set of cycles nd of non-empty sequences. Set(Cycle or non-empty Sequences) With the symolic method : I(z) = n 0 I n n! zn = exp ( log With the sddle point method : I n n! e 2 π e2 1 1 z + z ) = 1 1 z 1 z ez/(1 z) 1 2 n n 1 4

Connectedness Theorem The proility for r prtil injections of size n to form connected grph is ( ) p n = 1 2r 1 n r 1 + o n r 1 Proof Let J(z) = n>0 j nz n = n>0 Ir nz n /n!. Then 1+J(z) = exp(c(z)) nd C(z) = log(1+j(z)). From Bender theorem (1974) it is enough to check tht j n = o(j n 1 ) nd tht for some s 1, n s k=s j kj n k = O(j n s ), to otin tht c n = j n ( 1 2r n r 1 + o ( 1 n r 1 ))

Connectedness Theorem The proility for r prtil injections of size n to form connected grph is ( ) p n = 1 2r 1 n r 1 + o n r 1 Proof Let J(z) = n>0 j nz n = n>0 Ir nz n /n!. Then 1+J(z) = exp(c(z)) nd C(z) = log(1+j(z)). From Bender theorem (1974) it is enough to check tht j n = o(j n 1 ) nd tht for some s 1, n s k=s j kj n k = O(j n s ), to otin tht c n = j n ( 1 2r n r 1 + o ( 1 n r 1 ))

Vertices with zero or one outgoing or ingoing edge If x is vertex with 0 or 1 edge, then x must e isolted for r 1 injections nd n endpoint for the remining injection. The proility it is isolted for n injection is I n 1 I n, which is smller thn 1 n. Let I n,k e the numer of size-n injections hving k sequences, nd let I(z, u) e the ivrite generting function defined y : ( ( )) zu 1 I(z, u) = exp 1 z + log = 1 ( ) zu 1 z 1 z exp 1 z Using the sddle point theorem we otin tht the expected numer of sequences is 1 n nd tht the proility tht given vertex is n endpoint is in O( 1 n ).

Trimness Therefore A given vertex hs degree 0 or 1 with proility O(n r+1/2 ), there is such vertex with proility O(n r+3/2 ) with proility t lesto(n 1/2 ) the grph hs no such vertex.

IV. How to compre the two distriutions

Méthod A property P is generic for(x n ) when the proility for n element of X n to stisfy P tends towrd 1 when n tends towrd. A property P is negligile for(x n ) when the proility for n element of X n to stisfy P tends towrd O when n tends towrd. In the following, we present generic or negligile lgeric properties for ech distriution.

Méthod A property P is generic for(x n ) when the proility for n element of X n to stisfy P tends towrd 1 when n tends towrd. A property P is negligile for(x n ) when the proility for n element of X n to stisfy P tends towrd O when n tends towrd. In the following, we present generic or negligile lgeric properties for ech distriution.

Experimentl results FIGURE: On the left, rndom sugroup for the word-sed distriution with 5 words of lengths t most 40. On the right, rndom sugroup with 200 vertices for the grph-sed distriution (The lphet is of size 2).

Rnk One cn compute the rnk of finitely generted sugroup from its Stllings grph rnk = E ( V 1) In the word sed distriution (k words of mximl length n), the verge rnk is k In the grph sed distriution the verge rnk is ( A 1)n A n+1.

Rnk One cn compute the rnk of finitely generted sugroup from its Stllings grph rnk = E ( V 1) In the word sed distriution (k words of mximl length n), the verge rnk is k In the grph sed distriution the verge rnk is ( A 1)n A n+1.

Mlnormlity A sugroup H of G is norml when for ny g G, g 1 Hg = H. A sugroup is mlnorml when for ny g / H, g 1 Hg H = 1. Theorem (comintoril chrcteriztion) A sugroup of free group is non-mlnorml if nd only, in its Stllings grph, if there exists two vertices x y nd non-empty reduced word u, such tht u is the lel of loop on x nd of loop on y.

Mlnormlity A sugroup H of G is norml when for ny g G, g 1 Hg = H. A sugroup is mlnorml when for ny g / H, g 1 Hg H = 1. Theorem (comintoril chrcteriztion) A sugroup of free group is non-mlnorml if nd only, in its Stllings grph, if there exists two vertices x y nd non-empty reduced word u, such tht u is the lel of loop on x nd of loop on y.

Mlnormlity Theorem For the word-sed distriution, mlnormlity is generic, ut it is negligile for the grph-sed. Proof The proof in the word-sed distriution is due to Jitsukw (2002). Bsiclly loops re long enough to e distinct with high proility. The proility tht prtil injection contins t most one cycle nd tht the length of this cycle is 1 is e n.

Mlnormlity Theorem For the word-sed distriution, mlnormlity is generic, ut it is negligile for the grph-sed. Proof The proof in the word-sed distriution is due to Jitsukw (2002). Bsiclly loops re long enough to e distinct with high proility. The proility tht prtil injection contins t most one cycle nd tht the length of this cycle is 1 is e n.

Finite presenttion The ide is to quotient the free group y norml finitely generted sugroup. Let E e n ritrry suset, nd N(E) e its norml closure, tht is the smllest norml sugroup contining E. Equivlently ech word x of E ecomes reltor x = 1. In the word-sed distriution genericlly the quotient sugroup is infinite (Jitsukw, 2002). But in the grph-sed distriution, the quotient group is genericlly trivil.

Finite presenttion The ide is to quotient the free group y norml finitely generted sugroup. Let E e n ritrry suset, nd N(E) e its norml closure, tht is the smllest norml sugroup contining E. Equivlently ech word x of E ecomes reltor x = 1. In the word-sed distriution genericlly the quotient sugroup is infinite (Jitsukw, 2002). But in the grph-sed distriution, the quotient group is genericlly trivil.

Finite presenttion The ide is to quotient the free group y norml finitely generted sugroup. Let E e n ritrry suset, nd N(E) e its norml closure, tht is the smllest norml sugroup contining E. Equivlently ech word x of E ecomes reltor x = 1. In the word-sed distriution genericlly the quotient sugroup is infinite (Jitsukw, 2002). But in the grph-sed distriution, the quotient group is genericlly trivil.

Finite presenttion The ide is to quotient the free group y norml finitely generted sugroup. Let E e n ritrry suset, nd N(E) e its norml closure, tht is the smllest norml sugroup contining E. Equivlently ech word x of E ecomes reltor x = 1. In the word-sed distriution genericlly the quotient sugroup is infinite (Jitsukw, 2002). But in the grph-sed distriution, the quotient group is genericlly trivil.

Finite presenttion Theorem Genericlly the gcd of the lengths of the cycles of prtil injection of size n is 1. Theorem Genericlly the gcd of the lengths of the cycles of permuttion of size n is 1. Permuttion prt of n injection Genericlly the permuttion prt of size n injection is greter thn n 1/3 nd the gcd of the length of the cycles is 1.

Finite presenttion Theorem Genericlly the gcd of the lengths of the cycles of prtil injection of size n is 1. Theorem Genericlly the gcd of the lengths of the cycles of permuttion of size n is 1. Permuttion prt of n injection Genericlly the permuttion prt of size n injection is greter thn n 1/3 nd the gcd of the length of the cycles is 1.

Finite presenttion Theorem Genericlly the gcd of the lengths of the cycles of prtil injection of size n is 1. Theorem Genericlly the gcd of the lengths of the cycles of permuttion of size n is 1. Permuttion prt of n injection Genericlly the permuttion prt of size n injection is greter thn n 1/3 nd the gcd of the length of the cycles is 1.

Thnk you for your ttention!