MITOCW watch?v=8osuq1yxcci

Similar documents
MITOCW watch?v=wr88_vzfcx4

MITOCW watch?v=t6tqhnxy5wg

MITOCW watch?v=byeau9ilhmw

MITOCW watch?v=0usje5vtiks

MITOCW watch?v=rwzg8ieoc8s

MITOCW 6. Standing Waves Part I

MITOCW watch?v=ko0vmalkgj8

MITOCW ocw f07-lec39_300k

MITOCW watch?v=7q32wnm4dew

MITOCW ocw f99-lec17_300k

MITOCW MITRES18_005S10_DerivOfSinXCosX_300k_512kb-mp4

MITOCW big_picture_derivatives_512kb-mp4

MITOCW 2. Harmonic Oscillators with Damping

MITOCW 5. Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle and Particle in 1D Box

MITOCW watch?v=y6ma-zn4olk

MITOCW watch?v=nxgobnabn7u

MITOCW 11. Wavepacket Dynamics for Harmonic Oscillator and PIB

MITOCW Investigation 3, Part 1

MITOCW 8. Electromagnetic Waves in a Vacuum

MITOCW watch?v=r2nmwesncts

MITOCW MIT7_01SCF11_track24_300k.mp4

MITOCW watch?v=vkbtidshfsc

MITOCW MITRES18_005S10_DiffEqnsMotion_300k_512kb-mp4

MITOCW ocw f99-lec09_300k

MITOCW R11. Double Pendulum System

MITOCW R9. Generalized Forces

Instructor (Brad Osgood)

MITOCW MITRES_18-007_Part1_lec5_300k.mp4

MITOCW ocw feb k

MITOCW ocw f99-lec30_300k

MITOCW ocw f99-lec01_300k

MITOCW watch?v=fxlzy2l1-4w

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0602_300k-mp4

MITOCW watch?v=poho4pztw78

MITOCW watch?v=lteth1gzwoe

Spectral Lines. I've done that with sunlight. You see the whole rainbow because the prism breaks the light into all of its separate colors.

MITOCW watch?v=hdyabia-dny

MITOCW MIT18_02SCF10Rec_61_300k

MITOCW watch?v=_kkiq1h9uua

MITOCW watch?v=4ysfc9vd3ge

MITOCW ocw lec8

MITOCW MIT8_01F16_w02s05v06_360p

MITOCW MITRES18_005S10_DiffEqnsGrowth_300k_512kb-mp4

MITOCW 18. Quiz Review From Optional Problem Set 8

MITOCW watch?v=i0yacday-ww

MITOCW watch?v=ed_xr1bzuqs

MITOCW watch?v=b1ekhyc9tto

MITOCW ocw f99-lec16_300k

MITOCW ocw f99-lec23_300k

MITOCW 5. Traveling Waves without Damping

MITOCW watch?v=vjzv6wjttnc

MITOCW ocw f99-lec05_300k

MITOCW ocw-18_02-f07-lec02_220k

Note: Please use the actual date you accessed this material in your citation.

PROFESSOR: WELCOME BACK TO THE LAST LECTURE OF THE SEMESTER. PLANNING TO DO TODAY WAS FINISH THE BOOK. FINISH SECTION 6.5

MITOCW Lec 15 MIT 6.042J Mathematics for Computer Science, Fall 2010

Lecture 14, Thurs March 2: Nonlocal Games

The general topic for today is going to be oscillations, which are extremely important in the applications and in

MITOCW watch?v=4x0sggrxdii

Chemistry 271 Quantum Mechanics

MITOCW ocw-5_60-s08-lec07_300k

But, there is always a certain amount of mystery that hangs around it. People scratch their heads and can't figure

MITOCW watch?v=izkatzk5wxm

The ELECTRON: Wave Particle Duality. chapter 4

MITOCW watch?v=pqkyqu11eta

MITOCW watch?v=vu_of9tcjaa

MITOCW watch?v=gk_d6rkbmy8

MITOCW MIT6_041F11_lec17_300k.mp4

MITOCW ocw feb k

Instructor (Brad Osgood)

Note: Please use the actual date you accessed this material in your citation.

Quantum Mechanics: Stranger than we can imagine?

MITOCW ocw f99-lec31_300k

MITOCW watch?v=ufu6b7ohb8m

MITOCW ocw-18_02-f07-lec17_220k

MITOCW watch?v=ahv7akj2xs4

MITOCW watch?v=fkfsmwatddy

MITOCW watch?v=ybcsmyk5xmg

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0501_300k-mp4

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0000_300k-mp4

Lecture Outline Chapter 30. Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

MITOCW ocw-5_60-s08-lec19_300k

MITOCW MITRES18_006F10_26_0601_300k-mp4

CHM The Structure of the Atom, Revisited (r14) Charles Taylor 1/5

Light and Matter. Slide 1 / 62. Slide 2 / 62. Slide 3 / 62. Light and Sound. New Jersey Center for Teaching and Learning

MITOCW watch?v=a66tfldr6oy

Calculate the volume of propane gas at 25.0 C and 1.08 atm required to provide 565 kj of heat using the reaction above.

MITOCW watch?v=nw4vp_upvme

Antennas Prof. Girish Kumar Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Module 02 Lecture 08 Dipole Antennas-I

MITOCW watch?v=m00pjhtq6ju

Chapter 3 Atomic Diary

MITOCW ocw f08-lec19_300k

MITOCW MITRES6_012S18_L22-10_300k

MITOCW ocw-5_60-s08-lec17_300k

3: Linear Systems. Examples. [1.] Solve. The first equation is in blue; the second is in red. Here's the graph: The solution is ( 0.8,3.4 ).

MITOCW watch?v=ruz33p1icrs

37-6 Watching the electrons (matter waves)

ASTRO 114 Lecture Okay. What we re going to discuss today are what we call radiation laws. We ve

MITOCW ocw-18_02-f07-lec25_220k

I'm not going to tell you what differential equations are, or what modeling is. If you still are uncertain about those

Transcription:

MITOCW watch?v=8osuq1yxcci PROFESSOR: Determinism. And it all begins with photons. Einstein reluctantly came up with the idea that light was made of quanta-- quanta of light called photons. Now when you think of photons, we think of a particle. So everybody knew that light was a wave. Maxwell's equations had been so successful. Nevertheless, photoelectric effect-- Planck's work-- all were leading to the idea that, in some ways, photons were also particles. So when you think of a particle, however, there is an important difference between a particle in the sense of Newton, which is an object with zero size that carries energy and has a precise position and velocity at any time, and the quantum mechanical idea of particle, which is just some indivisible amount of energy or momentum that propagates. So light was made of photons-- packets of energy. And a photon is a particle-- a quantum mechanical particle. Not in the sense that maybe it has position and velocity determined or it's a point particle, but more like a packet that is indivisible. You cannot decompose it in further packets. So Einstein realized that for a photon, the energy was given by h nu. Where nu is the frequency of the light that this photon is helping build up. So if you have a beam of light, you should think it's billions of photons. And according to the frequency of that light that is related to the wavelength-- by the equation frequency times wavelength is velocity of light-- you typically know, for light, the wavelength, and you know the frequency, and then you know the energy of each of the photons. The photons have very, very little energy. We have very, very little energy, but your eyes are very good detectors of photons. If you're in a totally dark room, your eye, probably, can take as little as five photons if they hit your retina. So it's a pretty good detector of photons. Anyway, the thing that I want to explain here is what happens if a beam of light hits a polarizer. So what is a polarizer? It's a sheet of plastic or some material. It has a preferential direction. Let me align that preferential direction with the x- axis, and that's a polarizer. And if I send light that is linearly polarized along the x-axis, it all goes through. If I send light linearly polarized along the y-axis, nothing goes through. It all gets absorbed. That's what a polarizer does for a living. In fact, if you send light in this direction, the light that comes out is identical to the light that came in. The frequency doesn't change. The wavelength doesn't change. It's the same light,

the same energy. So far, so good. Now let's imagine that we send in light linearly polarized at some angle alpha. So we send an electric field E alpha, which is E0 cosine alpha x hat plus E0 sine alpha y hat. Well, you've studied electromagnetism, and you know that this thing, basically, will come around and say, OK, you can go through because you're aligning the right direction, but you are orthogonal to my preferential direction, or orthogonal I absorbed, so this disappears. So after the polarizer, E is just E0 cosine alpha x hat. That's all that is left after the polarizer. Well here is something interesting-- you know that the energy on electromagnetic field is proportional to the magnitude of the electric field square, that's what it is. So the magnitude of this electric field-- if you can notice, it's the square root of the sum of the squares will give you E0 as the magnitude of this full electric field. But this electric field has magnitude E0 cosine alpha. So the fraction of power-- fraction of energy through is cosine alpha squared. The energy is always proportional to the square. So the square of this is E0 squared cosine squared alpha. And for this one, the magnitude of it is E0, so you divide by E0 and cosine alpha is the right thing. This is the fraction of the energy. If alpha is equal to 0, you get cosine of 01. You get all the energy 1. If alpha is equal to pi over 2, the light is polarized along the y direction, nothing goes through-- indeed, cosine of pi over 2 is 0, and nothing goes through. So the fraction of energy that goes through is cosine squared alpha. But now, think what this means for photons. What it means for photons is something extraordinarily strange. And so strange that it's almost unbelievable that we get so easily in trouble. Here is this light beam over here, and it's made up of photons. All identical photons, maybe billions of photons, but all identical. And now, think of sending this light beam over there-- a billion identical photons-- you send them one by one into the state, and see what happens. You know what has to happen, because classical behavior is about right. This fraction of the photons must go through, and 1 minus that must not go through. You see, it cannot be there comes a photon and half of it goes through, because there's no such thing as half of it. If there would be half of it, it would be half the energy and, therefore, different color. And we know that after a polarizer, the color doesn't change. So here is the situation. You're sending a billion photons and, say, one-third has to get through. But now, the photos are identical.

How can that happen in classical physics? If you send identical photos, whatever happens to a photon will happen to all, but the photon either gets absorbed or goes through. And if it gets absorbed, then all should get absorbed. And if it goes through, all should go through because they are all identical. And now you have found a situation which identical set of experiments with identically prepared objects sometimes gives you different results. It's a debacle. It's a total disaster. What seems to have happened here-- you suddenly have identical photons, and sometimes they go through, and sometimes they don't go through. And therefore, you've lost predictability. It's so simple to show that if photons exist, you lose predictability. And that's what drove Einstein crazy. He knew when he entered these photons that he was getting in trouble. He was going to get in trouble with classical physics. So possible ways out-- people speculate about it-- people said, well, yes, the photos are identical, but the polarizer has substructure. If it hits in this interatomic part, it goes through, and in that interatomic part, it doesn't go through. People did experiments many times. It's not true. The polarizer is like that. And then came a more outrageous proposition by Einstein and others-- that there are hidden variables. You think the photons are identical, but a photon has a hidden variable-- a property you don't know about. If you knew that property about the photon, you would be able to tell if it goes through or it doesn't go through. But you don't know it, so that's why you're stuck with probabilities. It's because the quantum theory is not complete. There are hidden variables. And once you put the hidden variables, you'll discover the photon has more something inside it, and they are not the same, even though they look the same. And that's a hidden variable theory. And it sounds so philosophical that you would think, well, if you don't know about them, but they are there, these properties, how could you ever know they are there? And the great progress of John Bell with the Bell inequalities is that he demonstrated that that would not fix the problem. Quantum mechanics cannot be made deterministic with hidden variables. It was an unbelievable result-- the result of John Bell. So that's something we will advance towards in this course but not quite get there. 805 discusses this subject in detail. So at the end of the day, we've lost determinism. We can only predict probabilities. So photons either gets through or not, and can only predict probabilities. Now we write, in

So photons either gets through or not, and can only predict probabilities. Now we write, in classical physics, a beam like that. But how do we write the wave function of a photon? Well, this is quite interesting. We think of states of a particle as wave functions. And I will call them, sometimes, states; I will call them, sometimes, wave functions; and I sometimes will call them vectors. Why vector? Because the main thing you do with vectors is adding them or multiplying them by numbers to scale them. And that's exactly what you can do with a linear equation. So that's why people think of states, or wave functions, as vectors. And Dirac invented a notation in which to describe a photon polarized in the x direction, you would simply write something like this. Photon colon x and this object-- you think of it as some vector or wave function, and it represents a photon in the x direction. And we're not saying yet what kind of vector this is, but it's some sort of vector. It's not just a symbol, it represents a vector. And that's a possible state. This is a photon polarized along x. And you can also have, if you wish, a photon polarized along y. And linearity means that if those photos can exist, the superposition can exist. So there can exist a state called cos alpha photon x plus sine alpha photon y, in which I've superposed one state with another-- created a sum-- and this I call the photon state polarized in the alpha direction. So this is how, in quantum mechanics, you think of this-- photons-- we will elaborate that and compare with this equation. It's kind of interesting. What you lose here is this ease. There's no ease there because it's one photon. When you have a big electric field, I don't know how many photons there are. I would have to calculate the energy of this beam and find the frequency that I didn't specify, and see how many photons. But each photon in this beam quantum mechanically can be represented as this superposition. And we'll talk more about this superposition now because our next subject is superpositions and how unusual they are. Well the hidden variable explanation failed because Bell was very clever, and he noted that you could design an experiment in which the hidden variables would imply that some measurements would satisfy an inequality. If the existed hidden variables and the world was after all classical, the results of experiments would satisfy a Bell inequality. And then a few years later, the technology was good enough that people could test the Bell inequality with an experiment, and they figured out it didn't hold. So the hidden variables lead to Bell inequalities that are experimentally shown not to hold. And we will touch a little bit on it when we get to untangle them.

After the polarizer, the photon is in the state photon x. It's always polarized along the x direction, so it's kind of similar that this doesn't go through. This goes through, but at the end of the day, as we will explain very soon, the cosine alpha is not relevant here. When it goes through, the whole photon goes through. So there's no need for a cosine alpha. So that's what goes out of the polarizer.