Tutorial 3: Optimisation

Similar documents
ECON 186 Class Notes: Optimization Part 2

ECON2285: Mathematical Economics

ECON2285: Mathematical Economics

z = f (x; y) f (x ; y ) f (x; y) f (x; y )

Econ Slides from Lecture 14

ECON 255 Introduction to Mathematical Economics

EC /11. Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Problem Set 1 with Solutions. a11 a 12. x 2

The Kuhn-Tucker Problem

; p. p y p y p y. Production Set: We have 2 constraints on production - demand for each factor of production must be less than its endowment

September Math Course: First Order Derivative

CHAPTER 4: HIGHER ORDER DERIVATIVES. Likewise, we may define the higher order derivatives. f(x, y, z) = xy 2 + e zx. y = 2xy.

Lecture Notes for Chapter 12

Optimization, constrained optimization and applications of integrals.

Seminars on Mathematics for Economics and Finance Topic 5: Optimization Kuhn-Tucker conditions for problems with inequality constraints 1

Solutions. ams 11b Study Guide 9 econ 11b

Review of Optimization Methods

Lecture 4: Optimization. Maximizing a function of a single variable

1 Objective. 2 Constrained optimization. 2.1 Utility maximization. Dieter Balkenborg Department of Economics

Lakehead University ECON 4117/5111 Mathematical Economics Fall 2002

Problem Set 2 Solutions

BEEM103 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER. BUSINESS School. January 2009 Mock Exam, Part A. OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR ECONOMISTS solutions

Recitation 2-09/01/2017 (Solution)

where u is the decision-maker s payoff function over her actions and S is the set of her feasible actions.

STUDY MATERIALS. (The content of the study material is the same as that of Chapter I of Mathematics for Economic Analysis II of 2011 Admn.

Study Skills in Mathematics. Edited by D. Burkhardt and D. Rutherford. Nottingham: Shell Centre for Mathematical Education (Revised edn 1981).

EC /11. Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Lecture Notes. Course Outline

EconS 301. Math Review. Math Concepts

E 600 Chapter 4: Optimization

INTRODUCTORY MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMICS MSCS. LECTURE 3: MULTIVARIABLE FUNCTIONS AND CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION. HUW DAVID DIXON CARDIFF BUSINESS SCHOOL.

Modern Optimization Theory: Concave Programming

Mathematical Foundations -1- Constrained Optimization. Constrained Optimization. An intuitive approach 2. First Order Conditions (FOC) 7

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Royal Military College of Canada. ECE Modelling in Economics Instructor: Lenin Arango-Castillo

Nonlinear Programming (NLP)

CHAPTER 1-2: SHADOW PRICES

Constrained optimization BUSINESS MATHEMATICS

EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 2

IMP 2007 Introductory math course. 5. Optimization. Antonio Farfán Vallespín

Midterm Exam - Solutions

Recitation #2 (August 31st, 2018)

Homework 3 Suggested Answers

Econ 101A Problem Set 1 Solution

How to Characterize Solutions to Constrained Optimization Problems

Differentiation. 1. What is a Derivative? CHAPTER 5

MATH2070 Optimisation

CES functions and Dixit-Stiglitz Formulation

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

Constrained Optimization

The Kuhn-Tucker and Envelope Theorems

Microeconomics. Joana Pais. Fall Joana Pais

Mathematical Economics: Lecture 16

Bi-Variate Functions - ACTIVITES

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018

Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 1 / Reny, 32

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction

Microeconomics, Block I Part 1

Tutorial Code and TA (circle one): T1 Charles Tsang T2 Stephen Tang

Final Exam - Math Camp August 27, 2014

Economics 101A (Lecture 3) Stefano DellaVigna

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

Math Review ECON 300: Spring 2014 Benjamin A. Jones MATH/CALCULUS REVIEW

Constrained optimization.

Index. Cambridge University Press An Introduction to Mathematics for Economics Akihito Asano. Index.

Paul Schrimpf. October 17, UBC Economics 526. Constrained optimization. Paul Schrimpf. First order conditions. Second order conditions

Constrained Optimization. Unconstrained Optimization (1)

Optimization. Sherif Khalifa. Sherif Khalifa () Optimization 1 / 50

MATHEMATICS FOR ECONOMISTS. Course Convener. Contact: Office-Hours: X and Y. Teaching Assistant ATIYEH YEGANLOO

STATIC LECTURE 4: CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION II - KUHN TUCKER THEORY

= 2 = 1.5. Figure 4.1: WARP violated

Solutions. F x = 2x 3λ = 0 F y = 2y 5λ = 0. λ = 2x 3 = 2y 5 = x = 3y 5. 2y 1/3 z 1/6 x 1/2 = 5x1/2 z 1/6. 3y 2/3 = 10x1/2 y 1/3

Roles of Convexity in Optimization Theory. Efor, T. E and Nshi C. E

g(x,y) = c. For instance (see Figure 1 on the right), consider the optimization problem maximize subject to

Econ 101A Midterm 1 Th 29 September 2004.

Tutorial Letter 204/1/2016 DSC2606. Semester 2. Nonlinear mathematical programming. Department of Decision Sciences. Solutions: Assignment 04

Firms and returns to scale -1- Firms and returns to scale

Optimality conditions for Equality Constrained Optimization Problems

Advanced Microeconomics Fall Lecture Note 1 Choice-Based Approach: Price e ects, Wealth e ects and the WARP

x +3y 2t = 1 2x +y +z +t = 2 3x y +z t = 7 2x +6y +z +t = a

Microeconomic Theory: Lecture 2 Choice Theory and Consumer Demand

School of Business. Blank Page

The general programming problem is the nonlinear programming problem where a given function is maximized subject to a set of inequality constraints.

Lecture 8: Basic convex analysis

Properties of Walrasian Demand

i) This is simply an application of Berge s Maximum Theorem, but it is actually not too difficult to prove the result directly.

Optimization. A first course on mathematics for economists Problem set 4: Classical programming

Firms and returns to scale -1- John Riley

Hicksian Demand and Expenditure Function Duality, Slutsky Equation

Microeconomic Theory. Microeconomic Theory. Everyday Economics. The Course:

ECON 582: Dynamic Programming (Chapter 6, Acemoglu) Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko

Basics of Calculus and Algebra

Lecture 1: The Classical Optimal Growth Model

Technology 1. that describes the (net) output of the L goods of the production process of the firm. By convention,

DYNAMIC LECTURE 5: DISCRETE TIME INTERTEMPORAL OPTIMIZATION

ECON 4117/5111 Mathematical Economics

Structural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand

First Welfare Theorem

Introductory Microeconomics

Lecture Notes October 18, Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I.

Mathematical Preliminaries for Microeconomics: Exercises

Second Welfare Theorem

1.3 The Indirect Utility Function

Transcription:

Tutorial : Optimisation ECO411F 011 1. Find and classify the extrema of the cubic cost function C = C (Q) = Q 5Q +.. Find and classify the extreme values of the following functions (a) y = x 1 + x x 1x + 4x x + 6x (b) y = x 1 x + x 1 x + x x + x + x. State whether each of the following functions are concave, strictly concave, convex, strictly convex or neither: (a) y = x (b) y = x xz + z (c) y = x (d) y = xz 4. Find the extreme values of the function z = 8x + xy x + y + 1 and show that only one of the two extrema can be characterised as a local minimum and neither of the extrema can be characterised as a local maximum. If x = 0, how would you characterise the curvature of z at x? 5. Identify the stationary point of the function f (x 1, x, x ) = x 1 1x 1 x 1 x + x x x + x and show that this stationary point is a unique global minimum. 6. Identify the stationary point of the function f (x 1, x, x ) = x 1 x 1 x 1 x + x x 1.5x + 10x and determine if it represents a maximum or minimum. 7. Find the extremum of the following functions (a) z = xy subject to x + y = (b) z = x y xy subject to x + y = 6 (c) y = x + xz + 4z subject to x + z = 8 (d) y = x + z xz subject to x + z = 1 (e) y = ln x + ln z subject to z = 16 4x 1

8. Find the optimal values of each of the choice variables in the functions below, and solve for the Lagrangian multiplier too. (a) U(x, z) = x + x + z 6z + x subject to x + z =. (b) U(a, b, c) = 1 a + 4b 4a + 8c subject to 1 a + b + c. 9. Let A, α, β be positive constants. Show that the Cobb-Douglas production function is concave if and only if α + β 1. Q = AK α L β 10. A monopolist can produce quantities x and y of two products X and Y at cost 4x + xy + y. The inverse demand functions are p X = 150 5x + y p Y = 0 + x y where p X and p Y are the prices charged for X and Y. (a) Find the values of x, y, p X and p Y which maximise profit, and the maximal profit. (b) Confirm that your answer to (a) represents a maximum. 11. Find the extrema of z = x 1x + 8xy + y y + 6y and classify the extrema as minima or maxima, and as global (unique or not unique) or local. 1. Billy has a Cobb-Douglas utility function U(x 1, x ) = x /4 1 x 1/4 where x 1, x denote the consumption of cars and jets respectively. goods are p 1, p and Billy s income is m. The prices of the (a) Find the demand functions for cars and jets that maximise Billy s utility. (b) Confirm that your answer to (a) represents a constrained maximum. (c) What is the economic interpretation of the Lagrangian multiplier in this case?

1. The production of Jimmy Choo shoes (Q) requires two inputs, capital (K) and labour (L): Q = f(k, L) = 9K 1/ L / A unit of capital costs R4 and a unit of labour costs R16. (a) Does the production function exhibit increasing, decreasing or constant returns to scale? Explain your answer. (b) Show that the production function exhibits diminishing returns to each factor of production. (c) What is the cost minimising bundle of capital and labour to produce any fixed Q = Q? (d) Confirm that your answer to (a) represents a constrained minimum. (e) What is the economic interpretation of the Lagrangian multiplier in this case? 14. Solve the following maximisation problem by applying the Kuhn-Tucker theorem: max x,y 4x xy 4y subject to x + y x y 1 15. Solve the following maximisation problem by applying the Kuhn-Tucker theorem: max x,y.6x 0.4x + 1.6y 0.y subject to x + y 10 16. Consider the issue of optimal time allocation: x 0 y 0 Suppose that you have a utility function defined over two goods, x 1 and x, such that your utility function is u (x 1, x ). Suppose it takes t 1 units of time to consume x 1 units of Swiss chocolate and t units of time to consume x units of champagne. The total time available for consumption is T. Your challenge is to maximize your utility subject to your income constraint p 1 x 1 + p x m and time constraint t 1 x 1 + t x T. Assume that both x 1 and x are strictly positive at the optimum and u 1 and u are positive, reflecting non-satiation.

(a) Set up a Lagrangian function in which utility is maximized subject to both the time and income constraint and specify the first order conditions for the optimum. (b) Consider the four solution possibilities to this problem based on the four possible ways in which the complementary slackness conditions might be met. Which is most likely to yield the optimal solution? λ > 0 and µ > 0 λ > 0 and µ = 0 λ = 0 and µ > 0 λ = 0 and µ = 0 4

Tutorial : Optimisation SELECTED SOLUTIONS ECO411F 011 1. Q = 0 is a maximum Q = 10 is a minimum 6.. (a) y = 0 : minimum (b) y = 11 40 : minimum (a) strictly convex (b) strictly convex (c) strictly concave (d) neither 4. FOC z x = 4x + y 6x = 0 z y = x + y = 0 Solve simultaneously to get the extrema: x = y = 0 and x = y = 1 : SOC: zxx H = z yx z xy z yy = 48x 6 jh 1 j = j48x 6j = 48x 6 < 0 when x < 6 48 > 0 when x > 6 48 Thus, the Hessian cannot be everywhere positive or negative de nite and so neither of our extrema can be global. 1

We evaluate the Hessian at each critical point. Consider x = y = 0 : 6 H = Thus, H is inde nite at x = y = 0. jh 1 j = j 6j = 6 < 0 jh j = jhj = 16 < 0 Consider x = y = 1 : H = 10 jh 1 j = j10j = 10 > 0 jh j = jhj = 16 > 0 Thus, H is positive de nite at x = y = 1 and so this point is a local minimum. 5. FOC: @f @x 1 = 4x 1 1 x = 0 @f @x = x 1 + 6x x = 0 @f @x = x + x = 0 Solve these simultaneously to get the stationary point. SOC: f 11 f 1 f 1 4 0 H = 4f 1 f f 5 = 4 6 5 f 1 f f 0 jh 1 j = j4j = 4 > 0 jh j = 4 6 = 15 > 0 jh j = jhj = 46 > 0 The Hessian matrix is everywhere positive de nite, and so the stationary point represents a unique global minimum.

6. x 1 = 4; x = ; x = 4. This is a unique global maximum. 7. 8. (a) z = 1 when = 1 ; x = 1; y = 1. H = 4 > 0 and so this is a constrained maximum. (b) z = 19 when = 4; x = 1; y = 5. H = < 0 and so this is a constrained minimum. (c) (x ; z ) = (8; 0) Constrained minimum 1 (d) (x ; z ) = ; Constrained minimum 4 (e) (x ; z ) = ; Constrained maximum (a) (x ; z ; ) = (1; 4; 15) (b) (a ; b ; c ; ) = (1; 6; 1; 16) 9. First order derivatives: Hessian: H = = " @ Q @K @Q @Q @K @Q @K = AK 1 L @Q = AK L 1 @Q @Q @K @ Q # ( 1) AK L AK 1 L 1 AK 1 L 1 ( 1) AK L For production function to be concave, the Hessian must be negative de nite, i.e. the signs of the principal minors must alternate in sign, starting with a non-positive. Since A, K and L are positive jh 1 j = ( 1) AK L ( 1) 0 ) 0 1

jh j = ( 1) AK L AK 1 L 1 AK 1 L 1 ( 1) AK L = h ( 1) AK L i h ( 1) AK L i h AK 1 L 1i h AK 1 L 1i = ( 1) ( 1) A K L A K L = A K L ( 1) ( 1) Since A, K and L are positive, ( 1) ( 1) 0 0 + 0 ( + 1) 0 ) + 1 Therefore the function is concave i + 1: 10. (a) = xp X + yp Y 4x + xy + y = x (150 5x + y) + y (0 + x y) 4x xy y = 150x 5x + xy + 0y + xy y 4x xy y = 9x + xy + 150x 4y + 0y FOC: Solving simultaneously: Therefore: @=@x D (x; y) = @=@y 18x + y + 150 ) x 8y + 0 x = 9 y = 6 = 0 = 0 p X = 150 5 (9) + 6 = 111 p Y = 0 + (9) (6) = 6 4

And: max = xp X + yp Y 4x + xy + y = 9 (111) + 6 (6) 4 (9) + 9 (6) + (6) = 765 (b) SOC: H = D (x; y) = = @ =@x @=@x@y @=@y@x @ =@y 18 8 jh 1 j = j 18j < 0 jh j = 18 8 = 140 > 0 Thus, H is negative de nite and hence we have a maximum. 11. Dz = = @z=@x @z=@y 4x 1 + 8y 8x + y 4y + 6 H = D z = = @ z=@x @ z=@x@y @ z=@y@x @ z=@y 4 8 8 6y 4 FOCs 4x 1 + 8y = 0 (1) 8x + y 4y + 6 = 0 () 5

Solve simultaneously: From (1) Substitute () into () 8 y x = y 1 4 1 + y 4y + 6 = 0 4 ) y + 1y 6 = 0 ) y + 4y 1 = 0 ) (y + 6) (y ) = 0 ) y = 6; () Therefore, candidates for extrema are x = 69 4 and x = 5 11 ; y = ; z = 4 8 : SOCs: ; y = 6; z = 169 8 The de niteness of the Hessian matrix depends on the value of y, so the extrema cannot be absolute (global) but only relative (local) extrema. We must determine the de niteness of the Hessian matrix at the candidate extrema: At x = 69 4 ; y = 6 : H = 4 8 8 40 jh 1 j = j 4j = 4 < 0 jh j = 4 8 8 40 = 96 > 0 At this point, H is negative de nite. So this point is a local maximum. At x = 5 4 ; y = : H = 4 8 8 8 jh 1 j = j 4j = 4 < 0 jh j = 4 8 8 8 = 96 < 0 6

At this point, H is neither positive nor negative de nite. So this point is neither a local minimum nor a local maximum. 1. (a) FOCs: max L = x =4 x 1 ;x 1 x 1=4 + (m p 1 x 1 p x ) = @x 1 4 x 1=4 1 x 1=4 p 1 = 0 = 1 @x 4 x=4 1 x =4 p = 0 @ = m p 1x 1 p x = 0 Solving simultaneously: (b) SOC: 6 BH = 4 x 1 = m 4p 1 x = m 4p 0 p 1 p p 1 16 x 5=4 1 x 1=4 16 x 1=4 p 16 x 1=4 1 x =4 1 x =4 16 x=4 1 x 7=4 7 5 jbh j = 0 p 1 p p 1 16 x 5=4 1 x 1=4 16 x 1=4 p 16 x 1=4 1 x =4 1 x =4 1 x 7=4 16 x=4 = 1 16 x 5=4 1 x 7=4 p 1x 1 + 6p 1 p x 1 x + p x > 0 Therefore bordered Hessian is negative de nite, and we have a constrained maximum. (c) It is the marginal utility of money. 7

1. (a) Constant returns to scale. 9 (K) 1= (L) = = 9K 1= L = ) constant returns to scale. OR Sum the exponents 1 + = 1 ) constant returns to scale. (b) f K = K = L = f KK = K 5= L = < 0 ) diminishing returns to capital f L = 6K 1= L 1= f LL = K 1= L 4= < 0 ) diminishing returns to labour (c) Problem: min 4K + 16L subject to Q = K;L 9K1= L = Lagrangian: L = 4K + 16L + Q 9K 1= L = FOCs: (1) () @K = 4 K = L = = 0 (1) = 16 6K1= L 1= = 0 () @ = Q 9K1= L = = 0 () 1 4 = 1L K ) L = 1 K (4) Sub (4) into () Q 9K 1= 1 K = = 0 8 9 = K = Q K = = 9 Q = 0:176Q

L = 1 =! = 9 Q 1 9 1=Q = 0:088Q 4 K = L = = 0 ) = 4 K= L = = 4 = 9 Q! =! = 1 9 1=Q = 4 4=9 9 =! 9 = =9 7=9 = 4 = 5=9 = :86 (d) SOC: 0 K = L = 6K 1= L 1= H = 4K L = K 5= L = K = L 1= 5 6K 1= L 1= K = L 1= K 1= L 4= H = H = 0 K = L = 6K 1= L = + 1K 1= L = +6K 1= L 1= 6K 4= L 1= 1K 4= L 1= = K = L = 18K 1= L = + 6K 1= L 1= 18K 4= L 1= = 54K 1 108K 1 = 16K 1 16 = K 9

At K ; H = 16 K < 0 Therefore, the point is a constrained minimum. (e) It is the marginal cost. 14. Rewrite the constraints so they are in the form g i (x) 0 : (a) Set up the Lagrangian x + y 0 x y + 1 0 L = 4x xy 4y (x + y ) (x y + 1) The Kuhn-Tucker conditions are: Consider the possible cases in turn: = 8x y = 0 (1) @x = x 8y + = 0 () @y 0; x + y and (x + y ) = 0 0; x y 1 and (x y + 1) = 0 (a) Case 1: > 0; > 0 If > 0, then complementary slackness implies x + y = 0: If > 0, then complementary slackness implies x y + 1 = 0. Solving these equations simultaneously gives x = 0; y = 1: Substituting x = 0; y = 1 into equations (1) and () gives = 0 8 + = 0 Solving simultaneously gives = 18 5 ; = 4 5 which violates > 0: Case : > 0; = 0 If > 0, then complementary slackness implies x + y = 0: Substituting = 0 into equations (1) and () gives 8x y = 0 x 8y = 0 10

Solving these three equations simultaneously gives x = 1 4 ; y = 7 8 ; = 15 4 which violates > 0: Case : = 0; > 0 If > 0, then complementary slackness implies x y + 1 = 0. Substituting = 0 into equations (1) and () gives 8x y = 0 x 8y + = 0 Solving these three equations simultaneously gives x = 8 ; y = 1 4 ; = 5 4 which satis es all conditions. Case 4: = 0; = 0 Substituting = 0; = 0 into equations (1) and () gives 8x y = 0 x 8y = 0 which is satis ed if and only if x = 0; y = 0 which violates x no solution candidates here. y + 1 0: So Therefore: The Kuhn Tucker necessary conditions for a maximum are satis ed under Case where x = 8 ; y = 1 4 ; = 0; = 5 4 : (This point also satis es the su cient conditions for a maximum and so is the optimum point.) 15. Two possible Lagrangians and associated FOCs: (a) L = :6x 0:4x + 1:6y 0:y + (10 x y) FOCs: @x = :6 0:8x 0; x 0; (x) (:6 0:8x ) = 0 @y = 1:6 0:4y 0; y 0; (y) (1:6 0:4y ) = 0 0; x + y 10; () (x + y 10) = 0 OR 11

(b) L = :6x 0:4x + 1:6y 0:y + 1 (10 x y) + (x) + (y) FOCs: @x = :6 0:8x 1 + = 0 @y = 1:6 0:4y 1 + = 0 1 0; x + y 10; ( 1 ) (x + y 10) = 0 0; x 0; ( ) (x) = 0 0; y 0; ( ) (y) = 0 Consider the various cases (Working now with the Lagrangian and FOCs from (a)): Case (I): x + y = 10; x = 0; y = 0 (I) : x + y = 10; x = 0; y = 0 (II) : x + y < 10; x = 0; y = 0 (III) : x + y = 10; x > 0; y = 0 (IV) : x + y = 10; x = 0; y > 0 (V) : x + y < 10; x > 0; y = 0 (VI) : x + y < 10; x = 0; y > 0 (VII) : x + y = 10; x > 0; y > 0 (VIII) : x + y < 10; x > 0; y > 0 Inconsistent, since x = 0; y = 0 violates x + y = 10 Case (II): x + y < 10; x = 0; y = 0 x + y < 10 ) = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) Substituting = 0; x = 0; y = 0 into: @x = :6 0 and @y = 1:6 0 So no solution here. Case (III): x + y = 10; x > 0; y = 0 x + y = 10; y = 0 ) x = 5 1

x > 0 ) :6 0:8x = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) Sub in x = 5 : :6 0:8 (5) = 0 ) = 0: violates 0 Case (IV): x + y = 10; x = 0; y > 0 x + y = 10; x = 0 ) y = 10 y > 0 ) 1:6 0:4y = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) Sub in y = 10 : 1:6 0:4 (10) = 0 ) = :4 violates 0 Case (V): x + y < 10; x > 0; y = 0 x + y < 10 ) = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) Case (VI): x + y < 10; x = 0; y > 0 Sub in = 0; y = 0 into = 1:6 0:4y = 1:6 0 @y So no solution here x + y < 10 ) = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) Case (VII): x + y = 10; x > 0; y > 0 Sub in = 0; x = 0 into = :6 0:8x = :6 0 @x So no solution here x > 0 ) :6 0:8x = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) y > 0 ) 1:6 0:4y = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) x + y = 10 1

This gives the augmented matrix: 0:8 0 4 0 0:4 1 1 0 :6 1:6 10 5 Solving yields: x :5 4y5 = 4 5 0:4 This satis es all conditions and is a possible solution. Case (VIII): x + y < 10; x > 0; y > 0 x > 0 ) :6 0:8x = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) y > 0 ) 1:6 0:4y = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) x + y < 10 ) = 0 (from complementary slackness condition) Solving: But then: :6 0:8x (0) = 0 ) x = 4:5 1:6 0:4y 0 = 0 ) y = 4 16. x Therefore, the only solution is 4y5 x + y = (4:5) + 4 = 1 10 So no solution here. (a) L = u (x 1 ; x ) (p 1 x 1 + p x m) (t 1 x 1 + t x T ) The solution that provides the maximum value must satisfy: @x 1 = u 1 p 1 t 1 = 0 @x = u p t = 0 0; p 1 x 1 + p x m and (p 1 x 1 + p x m) = 0 0; t 1 x 1 + t x T and (t 1 x 1 + t x T ) = 0 14

(b) It will not be the case that = 0 and = 0 because complementary slackness implies that p 1 x 1 + p x < m and t 1 x 1 + t x < T and then more of one or both of the goods can be consumed, which would raise utility. It is also unlikely that both > 0 and > 0 since this would mean that both constraints would be binding, i.e. p 1 x 1 + p x = m and t 1 x 1 + t x = T: It is more likely that either > 0 and = 0, in which case the budget constraint is binding, or = 0 and > 0 in which case the time constraint is binding. 15