High Energy Particle Production by Space Plasmas

Similar documents
TeV energy physics at LHC and in cosmic rays

Cosmic Ray Astronomy. Qingling Ni

Cosmic Rays: A Way to Introduce Modern Physics Concepts. Steve Schnetzer

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays I

Cosmogenic neutrinos II

Cosmic Rays in the Galaxy

Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays propagation II

Charged-particle and gamma-ray astronomy: deciphering charged messages from the world s most powerful

Neutrino Oscillations and Astroparticle Physics (5) John Carr Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille (IN2P3/CNRS) Pisa, 10 May 2002

Low-Energy Cosmic Rays

Understanding High Energy Neutrinos

STUDY OF EXTENSIVE AIR SHOWERS IN THE EARTH S ATMOSPHERE

Particle Physics Beyond Laboratory Energies

> News < AMS-02 will be launched onboard the Shuttle Endeavour On May 2nd 2:33 P.M. from NASA Kennedy space center!

Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays: A Tale of Two Observatories

Investigation on mass composition of UHE cosmic rays using CRPropa 2.0

Propagation in the Galaxy 2: electrons, positrons, antiprotons

Extensive Air Showers and Particle Physics Todor Stanev Bartol Research Institute Dept Physics and Astronomy University of Delaware

Neutrino induced muons

Elementary Particle Physics Glossary. Course organiser: Dr Marcella Bona February 9, 2016

Topic 7. Relevance to the course

IceCube. francis halzen. why would you want to build a a kilometer scale neutrino detector? IceCube: a cubic kilometer detector

Questions 1pc = 3 ly = km

Short Course on High Energy Astrophysics. Exploring the Nonthermal Universe with High Energy Gamma Rays

Unravelling the Mysteries of Matter with the CERN Large Hadron Collider An Introduction/Overview of Particle Physics

PoS(ICRC2017)933. Cosmic rays and new fermionic dark matters. Jae-Kwang Hwang 1

Lecture 6-4 momentum transfer and the kinematics of two body scattering

Cosmic Rays: high/low energy connections

Mass Composition Study at the Pierre Auger Observatory

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

Implications of recent cosmic ray results for ultrahigh energy neutrinos

Hadronic interactions of ultra-high energy cosmic rays

PERSPECTIVES of HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINO ASTRONOMY. Paolo Lipari Vulcano 27 may 2006

Neutrino Physics: an Introduction

from Fermi (Higher Energy Astrophysics)

Absorption and production of high energy particles in the infrared background

Secondary particles generated in propagation neutrinos gamma rays

Cosmic ray studies at the Yakutsk EAS array: energy spectrum and mass composition

The Physics of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays. Example Poster Presentation Physics 5110 Spring 2009 Reminder: Posters are due Wed April 29 in class.

On the GCR/EGCR transition and UHECR origin

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Astroparticle Physics with IceCube

Particle + Physics at ATLAS and the Large Hadron Coillder

Cosmic Rays. Discovered in 1912 by Viktor Hess using electroscopes to measure ionization at altitudes via balloon

PEV NEUTRINOS FROM THE PROPAGATION OF ULTRA-HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS. Esteban Roulet CONICET, Bariloche, Argentina

The role of ionization in the shock acceleration theory

From the Knee to the toes: The challenge of cosmic-ray composition

Lomonosov Moscow State University. NUCLEON Chemical Composition and Energy Spectra of Cosmic Rays at TeV

99 Years from Discovery : What is our current picture on Cosmic Rays? #6 How cosmic rays travel to Earth? Presented by Nahee Park

UHECR and HADRONIC INTERACTIONS. Paolo Lipari Searching for the origin of Cosmic Rays Trondheim 18th June 2009

STATUS OF ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS

Nuclear and Particle Physics

Ultrahigh Energy cosmic rays II

Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays propagation I

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays: Observations and Analysis

The KASCADE-Grande Experiment

DIFFERENT H.E. INTERACTION MODELS

Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays What we have learnt from. HiRes and Auger. Andreas Zech Observatoire de Paris (Meudon) / LUTh

Results from the Tevatron: Standard Model Measurements and Searches for the Higgs. Ashutosh Kotwal Duke University

Wesley Smith, U. Wisconsin, January 21, Physics 301: Introduction - 1

Cosmic ray indirect detection. Valerio Vagelli I.N.F.N. Perugia, Università degli Studi di Perugia Corso di Fisica dei Raggi Cosmici A.A.

The gluon PDF: from LHC heavy quark production to neutrino astrophysics

The Particle World. This talk: What is our Universe made of? Where does it come from? Why does it behave the way it does?

UHE Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos with the Pierre Auger Observatory

John Ellison University of California, Riverside. Quarknet 2008 at UCR

Quanta to Quarks. Science Teachers Workshop 2014 Workshop Session. Adrian Manning

Blazars as the Astrophysical Counterparts of the IceCube Neutrinos

PHY-105: Introduction to Particle and Nuclear Physics

Review of direct measurements of cosmic rays. Sources of Galactic cosmic rays APC, Paris - December 7-9, 2016

Soon after the discovery of the cosmic background radiation (CBR), Greisen [1], and independently, Zatsepin amd Kuz'min [2], realized that it limits t

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

Air Shower Measurements from PeV to EeV

Cosmic Rays, their Energy Spectrum and Origin

PeV Neutrinos from Star-forming Regions. Hajime Takami KEK, JSPS Fellow

Accurate Measurement of the Cosmic Ray Proton Spectrum from 100TeV to 10PeV with LHAASO

Ultra- high energy cosmic rays

Frontier Particle Accelerators

The Physics of Particles and Forces David Wilson

2 ATLAS operations and data taking

Cosmic Rays. M. Swartz. Tuesday, August 2, 2011

High Energy Emission. Brenda Dingus, LANL HAWC

Publications of Francesco Arneodo: journal articles

SEARCHES OF VERY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS. Esteban Roulet CONICET, Centro Atómico Bariloche

LHC searches for dark matter.! Uli Haisch

Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays and Astrophysics. Hang Bae Kim Hanyang University Hangdang Workshop,

The Physics of Cosmic Rays

RECENT RESULTS FROM THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Higgs Searches at CMS

Windows on the Cosmos

The God particle at last? Astronomy Ireland, Oct 8 th, 2012

Investigating post-lhc hadronic interaction models and their predictions of cosmic ray shower observables

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 14 Jul 2017

ULTRA-HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAY COMPOSITION and MUON CONTENT vs. HADRONIC MODELS. Esteban Roulet Bariloche, Argentina

Charged Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos

Mass composition studies around the knee with the Tunka-133 array. Epimakhov Sergey for the Tunka-133 collaboration

Study of muon bundles from extensive air showers with the ALICE detector at CERN LHC

The ATLAS Experiment and the CERN Large Hadron Collider

32 IONIZING RADIATION, NUCLEAR ENERGY, AND ELEMENTARY PARTICLES

Transcription:

Plasmas in Astrophysics and in Laboratory, 20 21 June, 2011 High Energy Particle Production by Space Plasmas A.A.Petrukhin National Research Nuclear University MEPhI C o n t e n t s 1. Introduction 2. Some results of cosmic ray investigations 3. Cosmophysical approach to CR investigations 4. Generation of CR in plasma pinches 5. Quark-gluon plasma in CR interactions 6. Nuclear-physical approach to CR investigations 7. Conclusions

Introduction Cosmic rays are the important source of information about our Universe. Composition of CR: protons, nuclei, electrons, photons, neutrinos and possibly other unknown (today) particles. Cosmic rays energies: Terms HE, VHE, UHE are rather relative: HE accelerator energies; VHE above accelerator energies (today > 10 15 ev, tomorrow > 10 17 ev); UHE > 10 18 ev or > 10 19 ev.

Directions and methods of CR investigations Directions: - characteristics of CR flux (energy spectrum, composition, arrival directions); - CR origin (generation, acceleration, propagation); - interactions of VHE cosmic rays (above the energies of existing accelerators). Methods: Below 10 15 ev direct measurements at balloons and satellites are possible. Above 10 15 ev only indirect methods (EAS studies).

What we know about VHE cosmic rays? 1. Flux: - permanent in time; - isotropic in directions. 2. Energy spectrum - ranged at least up to 10 20 ev; - is described by power function with average 1.7; - has three peculiarities: knee, ankle & GZK cutoff. 3. Interaction - corresponds to accelerator data at energies below 10 15 ev (about 1 TeV in center-of-mass system); - various unusual events are observed starting from several PeV (10 15 ev ) energies.

Results of energy spectrum measurements Really, in the best case, EAS energy can be evaluated.

How can one explain available data about VHE cosmic rays Taking into account that all data about VHECR have been obtained from results of experiments in the atmosphere, in principle there are two possibilities of their explanation: These data are characteristics of CR primary spectrum (Cosmophysical approach); These data are results of CR interactions in atmosphere (Nuclear-physical approach); Now the first point of view prevails.

Basic ideas of the cosmophysical approach EAS energy is equal to the energy of primary particle. All changes of EAS characteristics in dependence of energy are results of energy spectrum or/and composition changes only. Primary cosmic rays have galactic origin. Their acceleration and keeping in Galaxy are determined by their charge Z or/and mass A. And the following results were obtained:

Results of energy spectrum interpretation

CR integral energy spectrum N 1.7 knee galactic 2.0 ankle cutoff 1.7 extragalactic 10 14 ev 10 16 ev 10 18 ev 10 20 ev E

The main problems of cosmic ray origin 1. What are sources of cosmic rays and mechanisms of their acceleration up to so large energies? 2. How to obtain the value of the energy spectrum slope 1.7, which is necessary for explanations of results CR energy spectrum measurements? Many ideas were proposed to solve these tasks, but satisfactory generally accepted solution was not found. Therefore I would like to pay your attention to one very interesting model which was proposed by specialists in plasma physics.

Model of CR acceleration in plasma pinches 1 This model was presented at International conference on plasma physics in New Delhi, India, 1989, by B.A.Trubnikov, V.P.Vlasov, S.K.Zhdanov Kurchatov Institute, Moscow and published in Proceedings of this Conference 1989, v.1, p.257. The main idea of this model is the following. In cosmic plasma (of any origin) electrical discharges "cosmic lightnings" can occur, at which cylindrical pinches are formed, similar to laboratory ones.

Model of CR acceleration in plasma pinches 2 Two basic instabilities of plasma pinches are known: snaky and neck. Snaky Neck Plasma jets are squeezed out of pinch neck. These jets are accelerated particle beams.

Model of CR acceleration in plasma pinches 3 It was shown that energy distribution of particles in jets has the following form: dn de - 1 3 ~ E, which does not depend on pinch sizes, currents in pinches and other parameters. These parameters determine a proportionality coefficient only.

Model of CR acceleration in plasma pinches 4 In the model the well-known equations of plasma physics are used only. Model has no free parameters except for absolute intensity. Model predicts for the energy spectrum slope the unambiguous value = 2.73. Model has no limitation for accelerated particle energy since in plasma pinch neck: density, when its radius r 0

Other interesting consequences The composition of accelerated particles will be the same as composition of cosmic plasma, which consists mainly of hydrogen. Model explains the absence of point sources of cosmic rays since pinches, f.e. near Supernova, can be oriented in any direction. At the same time, generation of particles in narrow jets in cylindrical pinches can explain the appearance of correlated particles. But the main advantage of pinch model is possibility to explain the observed CR energy spectrum as a result of interaction model change (nuclear physical approach).

Possible variants of interaction model change Inclusion of new (f.e. super-strong) interaction. Appearance of new massive particles (supersymmetric, Higgs bosons, relatively long-lived resonances, etc.) Production of blobs of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) (better to speak about quark-gluon matter (QGM), since usual plasma is a gas but quark-gluon matter is a liquid). We considered the last model since it is the most realistic and allows demonstrably explain the inclusion of new interaction.

Quark-gluon matter 1. Production of QGM provides two main conditions: - threshold behavior, since for that large temperature (energy) is required; - large cross section, since the transition from quark-quark interaction to some collective interaction of many quarks occurs: 2 R 2 or R 2 1 R2 where R, R 1 and R 2 are sizes of quark-gluon blobs. 2. But for explanation of other observed phenomena a large value of orbital angular momentum is required.

Orbital angular momentum in non-central ion-ion collisions Zuo-Tang Liang and Xin-Nian Wang, PRL 94, 102301 (2005); 96, 039901 (2006)

L Centrifugal barrier 1. As was shown by Zuo-Tang Liang and Xin-Nian Vang, in non-central collisions a globally polarized QGP with large orbital angular momentum which increases with energy appears. s 2. In this case, such state of quark-gluon matter can be considered as a usual resonance with a large centrifugal barrier. 2 2 3. Centrifugal barrier will be large for V( L) L 2mr light quarks but less for top-quarks or other heavy particles.

Centrifugal barrier for different masses

How interaction is changed in frame of a new model? 1. Simultaneous interactions of many quarks change the energy in the center of mass system drastically: 2. Produced tt-quarks take away energy t 2mt 350 GeV, and taking into account fly-out energy, t > 4m t 700 GeV in the center of mass system. 3. Decays of top-quarks S 2m E 2m E p 1 c 1 where m c nm N. At threshold energy, n ~ 4 ( - particle) t t W W b b W bosons decay into leptons (~30%) and hadrons (~70%); b c s u with production of muons and neutrinos.

How the energy spectrum is changed? 1. One part of t-quark energy gives the missing energy ( e,,, ), and another part changes EAS development, especially its beginning, parameters of which are not measured. 2. As a result, measured EAS energy E 2 will not be equal to primary particle energy E 1 and the measured spectrum will be differed from the primary spectrum. 3. Transition of particles from energy E 1 to energy E 2 gives a bump in the energy spectrum near the threshold.

dn/de, arb. units Change of primary energy spectrum 10-18 10-19 10-20 10-21 10-22 10-23 10-24 10-25 10 15 10 16 10 17 E, ev

How measured composition is changed in frame of the new approach Since for QGM production not only high temperature (energy) but also high density is required, threshold energy for production of new state of matter for heavy nuclei will be less than for light nuclei and protons. Therefore heavy nuclei (f.e., iron) spectrum is changed earlier than light nuclei and proton spectra!!! To compare the changes of spectra of different nuclei, very simple model was used.

Relation between primary energy E 1 and measured energy E 2 E 2 2 m E, E A 2 c 1 t 1 i 2m c where t is total energy of top-quarks in the center-of-mass system. Threshold energy E th, above which QGM blobs are produced, is determined by nucleus mass number A i. In principle, compound mass m c may depend on A i and E 1 > E th, too.

t E Simplest model m c = constant = nm N. E E 4mt ln 1.7 E th E 23 6 56 n m10, GeV Ai n th c 1 1 where ln takes into account the increasing of top-quark multiplicity and square root provides transition into the center-of-mass system. n = 4 th

Primary spectra of various nuclei

Measured spectra for some nuclei and spectrum of all particles E 2.7 dn/de, GeV 1.7 m -2 s -1 sr -1 10 5 10 4 All elements H He CNO NeMgSi Fe 10 3 10 2 10 15 10 16 10 17 10 18 10 19 E, ev

Influence of energy straggling E 2.7 dn/de, GeV 1.7 m -2 s -1 sr -1 10 5 8x10 4 6x10 4 measurement errors 0% 10% 20% 4x10 4 2x10 4 10 15 10 16 10 17 E, ev

Comparison with experimental data (with 10% straggling)

Explanation of the ankle appearance On the face of it, the considered approach does not explain the behavior of the energy spectrum above the ankle, but this is not so. With increasing of primary particle energy, the excitation level in blob of QGM can exceed the centrifugal barrier, and it will decay into light quarks.

Illustration of the ankle appearance The knee 10 17 ev 10 18 ev The ankle In this case, there will be no missing energy and the measured spectrum begins to return to the initial form ( = 2.7).

Conclusion Model of CR generation in plasma pinches is the single which unambiguously predicts the energy spectrum slope equal 2.7 (2.73). Nuclear-physical approach, in which are combined two types of plasmas, allows solve practically all problems of cosmic ray investigations above the knee. If this approach is correct, it will be an excellent present to 100 year anniversary of cosmic ray discovery!

Thank you for your attention!