Uniformly convex functions II

Similar documents
arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 19 Jul 2012

Hankel determinant for p-valently starlike and convex functions of order α

STARLIKENESS ASSOCIATED WITH PARABOLIC REGIONS

CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS OF COMPLEX ORDER

Coefficient bounds for some subclasses of p-valently starlike functions

On a new class of (j, i)-symmetric function on conic regions

Fekete-Szegö Inequality for Certain Classes of Analytic Functions Associated with Srivastava-Attiya Integral Operator

COEFFICIENT INEQUALITY FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

Convolutions of Certain Analytic Functions

On a class of analytic functions related to Hadamard products

ON POLYHARMONIC UNIVALENT MAPPINGS

On a New Subclass of Salagean Type Analytic Functions

SOME PROPERTIES OF A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY A GENERALIZED SRIVASTAVA-ATTIYA OPERATOR. Nagat. M. Mustafa and Maslina Darus

Subclass of Meromorphic Functions with Positive Coefficients Defined by Frasin and Darus Operator

Second Hankel determinant for the class of Bazilevic functions

An Investigation on Minimal Surfaces of Multivalent Harmonic Functions 1

Subclass Of K Uniformly Starlike Functions Associated With Wright Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

FUNCTIONS WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS

SOME INCLUSION PROPERTIES OF STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH HOHLOV OPERATOR. II

A Note on Coefficient Inequalities for (j, i)-symmetrical Functions with Conic Regions

DISTORTION THEOREMS FOR HIGHER ORDER SCHWARZIAN DERIVATIVES OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

On certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with generalized struve functions

Certain subclasses of uniformly convex functions and corresponding class of starlike functions

ON SOME LENGTH PROBLEMS FOR ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

ON CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS AND RADIUS PROPERTIES

On neighborhoods of functions associated with conic domains

BIII/. Malaysinn Math. Sc. Soc. (Second Series) 26 (2003) Coefficients of the Inverse of Strongly Starlike Functions. ROSlHAN M.

On the mean values of an analytic function

ON CERTAIN CLASS OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH CONIC DOMAINS INVOLVING SOKÓ L - NUNOKAWA CLASS

Subclasses of bi-univalent functions related to shell-like curves connected with Fibonacci numbers

THIRD HANKEL DETERMINANT FOR THE INVERSE OF RECIPROCAL OF BOUNDED TURNING FUNCTIONS HAS A POSITIVE REAL PART OF ORDER ALPHA

COEFFICIENT INEQUALITY FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

A NEW SUBCLASS OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTION WITH POSITIVE COEFFICIENTS

Hyperbolically convex functions

SANDWICH-TYPE THEOREMS FOR A CLASS OF INTEGRAL OPERATORS ASSOCIATED WITH MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

Harmonic Mappings for which Second Dilatation is Janowski Functions

Starlike Functions of Complex Order

STARLIKE MAPPINGS OF ORDER α ON THE UNIT BALL IN COMPLEX BANACH SPACES

Rosihan M. Ali and V. Ravichandran 1. INTRODUCTION

Coefficient Inequalities of a Subclass of Starlike Functions Involving q - Differential Operator

On a New Subclass of Meromorphically Multivalent Functions Defined by Linear Operator

Meromorphic parabolic starlike functions with a fixed point involving Srivastava-Attiya operator

arxiv: v3 [math.cv] 11 Aug 2014

A NOTE ON UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS WITH FINITELY MANY COEFFICIENTS. Abstract

Fekete-Szegö Problem for Certain Subclass of Analytic Univalent Function using Quasi-Subordination

THE FEKETE-SZEGÖ COEFFICIENT FUNCTIONAL FOR TRANSFORMS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Communicated by Mohammad Sal Moslehian. 1.

arxiv: v2 [math.cv] 26 Nov 2011

BOUNDEDNESS, UNIVALENCE AND QUASICONFORMAL EXTENSION OF ROBERTSON FUNCTIONS. Ikkei Hotta and Li-Mei Wang

An Application of Wilf's Subordinating Factor Sequence on Certain Subclasses of Analytic Functions

Applied Mathematics Letters

On Multivalent Functions Associated with Fixed Second Coefficient and the Principle of Subordination

ON THE FEKETE-SZEGÖ INEQUALITY FOR A CLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY USING GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR

Abstract. For the Briot-Bouquet differential equations of the form given in [1] zu (z) u(z) = h(z),

Coefficient Estimates for Bazilevič Ma-Minda Functions in the Space of Sigmoid Function

SUBORDINATION RESULTS FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIVALENT MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS

Quasi-Convex Functions with Respect to Symmetric Conjugate Points

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

SOME APPLICATIONS OF SALAGEAN INTEGRAL OPERATOR. Let A denote the class of functions of the form: f(z) = z + a k z k (1.1)

L p -convergence of Bernstein Kantorovich-type operators. by Michele Campiti (Bari) and Giorgio Metafune (Lecce)

Convex Functions and Functions with Bounded Turning

Abstract. We derive a sharp bound for the modulus of the Schwarzian derivative of concave univalent functions with opening angle at infinity

Coecient bounds for certain subclasses of analytic functions of complex order

Growth and distortion theorem for the Janowski alpha-spirallike functions in the unit disc

AN EXTENSION OF THE REGION OF VARIABILITY OF A SUBCLASS OF UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

arxiv: v1 [math.cv] 22 Apr 2009

Differential Operator of a Class of Meromorphic Univalent Functions With Negative Coefficients

Research Article A New Class of Meromorphically Analytic Functions with Applications to the Generalized Hypergeometric Functions

Notes on Starlike log-harmonic Functions. of Order α

A Certain Subclass of Multivalent Functions Involving Higher-Order Derivatives

Two Points-Distortion Theorems for Multivalued Starlike Functions

Subordinate Solutions of a Differential Equation

Convolution Properties of Convex Harmonic Functions

APPLYING RUSCHEWEYH DERIVATIVE ON TWO SUB-CLASSES OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS

On a subclass of n-close to convex functions associated with some hyperbola

On a subclass of certain p-valent starlike functions with negative coefficients 1

A note on a subclass of analytic functions defined by a generalized Sălăgean and Ruscheweyh operator

UDC S. Yu. Graf ON THE SCHWARZIAN NORM OF HARMONIC MAPPINGS

Some Further Properties for Analytic Functions. with Varying Argument Defined by. Hadamard Products

On a subclass of analytic functions involving harmonic means

arxiv: v2 [math.cv] 24 Nov 2017

Coefficient Bounds for Certain Subclasses of Analytic Function Involving Hadamard Products

Old and new order of linear invariant family of harmonic mappings and the bound for Jacobian

On α-uniformly close-to-convex and. quasi-convex functions with. negative coefficients

SOME SUBCLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY GENERALIZED DIFFERENTIAL OPERATOR. Maslina Darus and Imran Faisal

Int. J. Open Problems Complex Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 1, March 2011 ISSN ; Copyright c ICSRS Publication,

Mapping the disk to convex subregions

Subordination and Superordination Results for Analytic Functions Associated With Convolution Structure

Second Hankel Determinant Problem for a Certain Subclass of Univalent Functions

n=2 AMS Subject Classification: 30C45. Keywords and phrases: Starlike functions, close-to-convex functions, differential subordination.

A Class of Univalent Harmonic Mappings

A SUBORDINATION THEOREM WITH APPLICATIONS TO ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

SCHWARZIAN DERIVATIVES OF CONVEX MAPPINGS

COEFFICIENTS OF BI-UNIVALENT FUNCTIONS INVOLVING PSEUDO-STARLIKENESS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEBYSHEV POLYNOMIALS

Majorization Properties for Subclass of Analytic p-valent Functions Defined by the Generalized Hypergeometric Function

Radius of close-to-convexity and fully starlikeness of harmonic mappings

Coefficients estimates of some subclasses of analytic functions related with conic domain

Inclusion relationships for certain classes of analytic functions involving the Choi-Saigo-Srivastava operator

du+ z f 2(u) , which generalized the result corresponding to the class of analytic functions given by Nash.

The Relationships Between p valent Functions and Univalent Functions

Transcription:

ANNALES POLONICI MATHEMATICI LVIII. (199 Uniformly convex functions II by Wancang Ma and David Minda (Cincinnati, Ohio Abstract. Recently, A. W. Goodman introduced the class UCV of normalized uniformly convex functions. We present some sharp coefficient bounds for functions f(z = z + a z + a z +... UCV and their inverses f 1 (w = w + d w + d w +.... The series expansion for f 1 (w converges when w < ϱ f, where 0 < ϱ f depends on f. The sharp bounds on a n and all extremal functions were known for n = and ; the extremal functions consist of a certain function k UCV and its rotations. We obtain the sharp bounds on a n and all extremal functions for n = 4, 5, and 6. The same function k and its rotations remain the only extremals. It is known that k and its rotations cannot provide the sharp bound on a n for n sufficiently large. We also find the sharp estimate on the functional µa a for < µ <. We give sharp bounds on d n for n =, and 4. For n =, k 1 and its rotations are the only extremals. There are different extremal functions for both n = and n = 4. Finally, we show that k and its rotations provide the sharp upper bound on f (z over the class UCV. 1. Introduction. This is a continuation of our investigation of uniformly convex functions [MM]. Goodman [G] introduced the geometrically defined class UCV of uniformly convex functions in the unit disk D = {z : z < 1}. A function f is said to be uniformly convex in D if f is a normalized (f(0 = f (0 1 = 0 convex function and has the additional property that for every circular arc γ contained in D, with center also in D, the image arc f(γ is convex. The class CV of normalized (f(0 = f (0 1 = 0 convex univalent functions f is closely related to the class P of normalized holomorphic functions with positive real part. Recall that a holomorphic function p defined on D belongs to P provided that p(0 = 1 and Re{p(z} > 0, z D. Precisely, f CV if and only if p(z = 1 + zf (z/f (z P. In the earlier paper [MM], we introduced a subfamily PAR of P that plays an analogous role for the class UCV. Let PAR = {p(z P : p(d Ω}, 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 0C45. Key words and phrases: convex functions, coefficient bounds. Research partially supported by a National Science Foundation Grant.

76 W. Ma and D. Minda where Ω = {w = u + iv : v < u 1} = {w : Re w > w 1 }. The characterization that f UCV if and only if p(z = 1 + zf (z/f (z PAR was proved independently by Ma and Minda [MM], and Rønning [Rø 1 ]. This characterization enabled us to derive some subordination results for the class UCV, from which we derived sharp distortion, growth, rotation and covering theorems, and sharp bounds on the second and third coefficients as well as the sharp order of growth for the coefficients [MM]. In all of these cases, the function k given below is the sole extremal function up to rotations. The sharp bound on the second coefficient and an estimate for all coefficients were also discovered by Rønning [Rø 1 ]. In [Rø ], Rønning presented a convolution theorem related to UCV. In [MM], we also defined holomorphic functions k n (z in D by k n (0 = k n(0 1 = 0 and 1 + zk n(z/k n(z = q(z n 1, where q(z is a normalized Riemann mapping function from D to Ω. Explicitly, q(z = 1 + ( π log 1 + z 1 = 1 + z = 1 + 8 π n=1 ( n 1 1 n k=0 1 k + 1 B n z n n=1 z n. Clearly k n (z UCV. We write k (z as k(z and set k(z = z + A z + A z +.... The function k cannot be extremal for the problem of maximizing the modulus of the nth coefficient of functions in UCV for n sufficiently large [MM]. In this paper, we first prove that k and its rotations are still extremal for the problem of maximizing the modulus of the nth coefficient of functions in UCV when n = 4, 5 and 6. For the inverse function f 1 (w = w +d w + d w +..., it is interesting to observe that extremal functions of d n are k n and its rotations when n =, and 4. Then we find the sharp estimate of the coefficient functional µa a, < µ <. Finally, in Section 4, we obtain the sharp upper bound on f (z.. Preliminaries. If f(z = z + a z + a z +... UCV, then there exists a function p(z = 1 + b 1 z + b z + b z +... PAR such that p(z = 1 + zf (z/f (z. Although the bounds b n B 1 = 8/π (n = 1,,... [MM] are sharp for p(z PAR, they do not yield sharp bounds for a n when n.

Uniformly convex functions II 77 Here our idea is to obtain bounds on a n by first expressing a n in terms of coefficients of a function in the class P and then using coefficient bounds for functions in P. In this section, we derive the expressions needed and prove some coefficient inequalities for functions in P. The relationship between f(z UCV and p(z PAR implies that n 1 (1 n(n 1a n = ka k b n k. Furthermore, we have ( k=1 a = b 1, 6a = b + b 1, 1a 4 = b + b b 1 + 1 b 1, 0a 5 = b 4 + 4 b b 1 + 1 b + b b 1 + 1 6 b4 1, 0a 6 = b 5 + 5 4 b 4b 1 + 5 6 b b + 5 6 b b 1 + 5 8 b b 1 + 5 1 b b 1 + 1 4 b5 1. Since q(z is univalent in D and p q, the function p 1 (z = 1 + q 1 (p(z 1 q 1 (p(z = 1 + c 1z + c z + c z +... is holomorphic and has positive real part in D, that is, p 1 P. Equivalently, ( p1 (z 1 p(z = q. p 1 (z + 1 From the power series expansion of q, q(z = 1 + 8 π z + 16 π z + 184 45π z + 5 105π z4 + 4504 1575π z5 +..., we can express b n in terms of c n by direct calculation. Precisely, b 1 = 4 π c 1, b = 1 π (4c c 1, ( b = 1 π (4c 4 c 1c + 8 45 c 1, b 4 = 1 π (4c 4 4 c 1c c + 8 15 c 1c 5 c4 1, b 5 = 1 π (4c 5 4 c 1c 4 4 c c + 8 15 c 1c + 8 15 c 1c 8 5 c 1c + 1575 c5 1. The equalities in ( and ( then yield that (4.1 a = 4 π c 1,

78 W. Ma and D. Minda (4. 6a = 4 π c + ( 4 π π 1 c 1, (4. 1a 4 = 4 π c + 4 ( 18 π π 1 c c 1 + 8 ( 45π 1 45 π + 180 π 4 c 1, (4.4 0a 5 = 4 π c 4 + 4 ( 16 π π 1 c c 1 + ( 4 π π 1 c + 8 ( 1 π 15 11 9π + 8 c π 4 c 1 + π ( 1 5 + 79 15π 16 π 4 + 64 π 6 (4.5 0a 6 = 4 π c 5 + 4 ( 5 π π 1 c 4 c 1 + 4 ( 10 π π 1 c c + 4 ( π 5 0 π + 40 π 4 c c 1 + ( 4 π + 4 ( π 5 + 1 π 70 9π 4 + 80 π 6 c c 1 + ( 16 π 55 109 189π + 47 9π 4 80 π 6 + 64 π 8 15 5 9π + 0 π 4 c 5 1. c 4 1, c c 1 Hence coefficient estimates for the class UCV become non-linear coefficient problems for the class P. Note that if p 1 (z = (1 + z/(1 z, then p = q and f = k. Hence, if c n = for all n, then b n = B n and a n = A n. We list the explicit expressions for A n when n =,, 4, 5 and 6: A = 4 π, A = 8 9π + π 4, A 4 = 46 15π + 16 π 4 + 64 π 6, A 5 = 88 55π + 195 675π 4 + 56 15π 6 + 51 15π 8, A 6 = 5 65π + 14656 8505π 4 + 4864 405π 6 + 104 7π 8 + 048 45π 10. Now we recall some coefficient bounds for p 1 (z = 1 + c 1 z + c z + c z +... P. It is well known that c n (n = 1,,.... Livingston [L] proved that c n c m c n+m for n, m = 1,,.... We can also obtain the following lemma. (5 (6 and Lemma 1. If p 1 (z = 1 + c 1 z + c z + c z +... P, then c n 1 c n 1 c n, µc nc n c 4 n 8(µ (µ 4 (7 µc n c n c n 4(µ (µ 6.

Uniformly convex functions II 79 P r o o f. For p 1 (z = 1 + c 1 z + c z + c z +... P, we define h(z = 1 n p 1 (e ikπ/n z. n k=1 Then h(z = 1 + c n z n + c n z n + c n z n +... P, so that the function h 1 (z = 1 + c n z + c n z + c n z +... P. Hence it is enough to show the desired inequalities for n = 1. Consider w(z = p 1(z 1 p 1 (z + 1 = 1 c 1z + 1 (c 1 c 1z +..., which is holomorphic in D with w(0 = 0 and w(z < 1. As w (0/ 1 w (0 [A, p. 16], we have If µ, then c 1 c 1 1 c 1. µc 1c c 4 1 = c 1 µ(c 1 c 1 + ( 1 µ 1c 1 c 1 {µ( 1 c 1 + ( 1 µ 1 c 1 } = c 1 (µ c 1. As 0 c 1 and the right-hand side of the above inequality is an increasing function of c 1 for µ 4, we have inequality (6 when n = 1. If µ, then µc 1 c c 1 = c 1 µ(c 1 c 1 + ( 1 µ 1c 1 c 1 {µ( 1 c 1 + ( 1 µ 1 c 1 } = c 1 (µ c 1. Again the right-hand side of this inequality is an increasing function of c 1 for 0 c 1 and µ 6. This completes the proof of Lemma 1.. Coefficient bounds. Now we are ready to prove coefficient bounds for functions in UCV. Theorem 1. Let f(z = z + a z + a z +... UCV. Then a n A n (n = 4, 5, 6. Equality holds if and only if f(z is k(z or one of its rotations. P r o o f. When n = 4, we see that the coefficients in the expression of a 4 in (4. are all positive. So we get a 4 A 4 from c k (k = 1,,. When n = 5, from (4.4 we have 0a 5 = 4 π c 4 + 4 π + 16 π ( 16 π 1 c c 1 + ( 4 π π 1 c c 1 ( 5 4 45π + 4 π 4 + π 6 + π ( 1 5 79 15π + 16 π 4 64 π 6 c (4c 1c c 4 1.

80 W. Ma and D. Minda In this expression, all coefficients are positive. By using (6 of Lemma 1 for n = 1, µ = 4 and c k (k = 1,,, 4, we see that the upper bound of a 5 is given if we replace all c k by. That is, we have a 5 A 5. When n = 6, we rearrange the expression for a 6 given in (4.5 as follows: 0a 6 = 4 π c 5 + 4 ( 5 π π 1 c 4 c 1 + 4 ( 10 π π 1 c c + ( 16 π 55 109 189π + 47 9π 4 80 π 6 + 64 π 8 (c c c 1 + c 1c 1 + ( 404 c c 1 π + 4 π 55 411 189π + 67 9π 4 + 80 π 6 64 π ( 8 74 55 458 189π + 16 9π 4 160 π 6 64 π 8 (6c c 1 c 1c + ( π 5 175 + 1097 189π 47 9π 4 + 640 π 6 + 56 π 8 c c 1. Now, all coefficients in this expression are positive. This time we use (7 of Lemma 1 for n = 1 and µ = 6, c c c 1 + c 1 [LZ] and c k (k = 1,..., 5 to derive that the upper bound of 0 a 6 is achieved when we replace all c k by. Thus we have a 6 A 6. In each case, we have used the inequality c 1 in our proof. Hence equality holds only if p 1 (z = (1 + z/(1 z or one of its rotations, which implies that f = k or one of its rotations. On the other hand, it is clear that inequalities become equalities for k and its rotations. This completes the proof of Theorem 1. Next we discuss the coefficient functional µa a. But first, we introduce the following functions in UCV. For 0 λ 1, define h λ and g λ by h λ (0 = h λ (0 1 = g λ(0 = g λ (0 1 = 0, 1 + zh λ (z ( z(z + λ h λ (z = q, 1 + zg λ (z ( 1 + λz g λ (z = q z(z + λ. 1 + λz Then it is clear that both h λ and g λ belong to UCV. Also notice that h 1 = k, h 0 = k, g 1 (z = k( z and g 0 (z = k ( z. Theorem. Let f(z = z + a z + a z +... UCV. Then ( 8 6 π π µ 4 π 1 if + 5π 6 µ, µa 4 a π if π 6 µ + 5π 6, ( 8 π 6 π µ + 4 π + 1 if µ π 6.

Uniformly convex functions II 81 Equality holds if and only if f is k or one of its rotations when µ < / π /6 or / + 5π /6 < µ. For / π /6 < µ < / + 5π /6, equality holds if and only if f is equal to k or one of its rotations. If µ = / π /6, then equality holds if and only if f is h λ or one of its rotations. Finally, equality holds if and only if f is g λ or one of its rotations when µ = / + 5π /6. R e m a r k. When / π /6 < µ < / + 5π /6, the above inequality can be improved as follows: µa a + 1 ( π 1 + 1µ 8 a 4 π if π 6 < µ + π 18 and µa a + 1 ( 5π 1 1µ + 8 a 4 π In particular, by setting µ = 1, we get ( 1 a a + + π a 4 6 π. if + π 18 µ < + 5π 6. This clearly improves a a + 1 a normalized convex functions (see [T]. 1, which was established for P r o o f o f T h e o r e m. From (4.1 and (4. we obtain µa a = 1 (( 1 π π µ 8 π + 1 c 1 c. If µ / + 5π /6, then 1µ/π 8/π 5/ 0 and µa a = 1 ( 1 π π µ 8 π 5 c 1 + (c 1 c 1 ( ( 1 π 4 π µ 8 π 5 + 4 = 8 π ( 6 π µ 4 π 1 Here we have used c 1 c and c 1. If µ / π /6, then 1µ/π +8/π 1/ 0 and c 1, c imply that µa a = 1 ( 1 c 1 + c π 8 π π µ + 8 π 1 ( 6 π µ + 4 π + 1..

8 W. Ma and D. Minda Now we assume / π /6 µ / + π /18, then 1µ/π + 8/π + / 0. By using (5 of Lemma 1 for n = 1, we have µa a + 1 ( π 1 + 1µ 8 a = 1 { ( π c 1 ( c 1 + 1 π µ + 8 π + c 1 ( 1 + π µ 8 π + 1 } c 1 1 { ( π 4 c 1 + 1 π µ + 8 π + ( 1 c 1 + π µ 8 π + 1 } c 1 = 4 π. This is the stronger result in the remark above. Finally, we consider the case when / + π /18 µ / + 5π /6. Note that in this case 1µ/π 8/π / 0. Once again we use (5 for n = 1 to get µa a + 1 ( 5π 1 1µ + 8 a = 1 { ( π c 1 ( 1 c 1 π µ 8 π c 1 ( + 1 π µ + 8 π + 5 } c 1 1 { ( 1 π 4 c 1 + π µ 8 π ( c 1 + 1 π µ + 8 π + 5 } c 1 = 4 π. It is the stronger result stated in the above remark. From our proof, we see that when µ < / π /6 or µ > / + 5π /6, equality holds if and only if c 1 =, equivalently, f is k or one of its rotations. For / π /6 < µ < / + 5π /6, equality holds if and only if c = and c 1 = 0, that is, f is equal to k or one of its rotations. If µ = / π /6, then equality holds if and only if c =, or up to rotation [P, p. 41], p 1 (z = 1 + λ So f is h λ or one of its rotations. 1 + z 1 z + 1 λ 1 z 1 + z, 0 λ 1.

Uniformly convex functions II 8 Finally, when µ = /+5π /6, equality holds if and only if c 1 c =. Thus up to rotation, p 1 is given by p 1 (z 1 = 1 + λ 1 + z 1 z + 1 λ 1 z 1 + z, 0 λ 1. This implies that f is g λ or one of its rotations. This completes the proof of Theorem. The known sharp bounds on a and a can easily be obtained from Theorem. To discuss coefficient bounds for the inverses of functions in UCV, we first observe that for the inverse function K n (w of k n (z, K n (w = w 8 (n 1nπ wn +.... Hence for f UCV with F (w = f 1 (w = w + d w + d w +..., max{ d n : f UCV} 8 (n 1nπ. For n =,, 4, we can prove that equality holds. Note that the series expansion for f 1 (w converges when w < ϱ f, where 0 < k( 1 ϱ f [MM] depends on f. Theorem. Let f UCV and F (w = f 1 (w = w+d w +d w +.... Then 8 d n (n 1nπ (n =,, 4. Equality holds if and only if f is equal to k n or one of its rotations. P r o o f. As F (f(z = z, we have d = a, d = a a, d 4 = a 4 + 5a a 5a. By using (4.1 (4., we can express d n in terms of c n as follows: d = π c 1, d = 1 (( 16 π π + 1 c 1 c and d 4 = 1 ( ( 1 π c + 14 ( π c c 1 + 45 + 7 π + 48 π 4 c 1. Now it is clear that d 4/π. Equality holds if and only if c 1 =, that is, f is k or one of its rotations. Also, d = 1 ( 16 π π + 1 ( 5 (c c 1 + 16 π c 4 π.

84 W. Ma and D. Minda Here we have used c c 1 and c. Equality holds if and only if c = and c 1 = 0, or equivalently, f is k or one of its rotations. By using c c c 1 + c 1 [LZ], c c c 1 and c, we get d 4 = 1 ( (c c c 1 + c 1 π + 45 + 7 π + 48 π ( 4 11 45 + 8 π 96 π 4 (c c c 1 + ( 45 5 π + 48 π 4 c π. In this case, the inequality becomes equality if and only if c = and c = c 1 = 0, which is the same as saying f is k 4 or one of its rotations. The proof of Theorem is now complete. 4. Upper bound on f (z. Finally in this section, we derive the sharp upper bound on f (z for functions in UCV. Theorem 4. Let f UCV and z = r < 1. Then f (z k (r. Equality holds for any z D if and only if f is k or one of its rotations. P r o o f. Let p(z=1+zf (z/f (z. Then p q implies that p 1 q 1. As all coefficients of q 1 are positive, the subordination principle yields that for z = r, p(z 1 q(r 1. This is the same as f (z/f (z k (r/k (r. From f (z k (r [MM], we see that f (z k (r f (z/f (z k (r. We also know that equality holds in f (z k (r for some z 0 if and only if f is a rotation of k [MM]. Moreover, equality in Theorem 4 at z = 0 is equivalent to a = A. Hence equality holds if and only if f is k or one of its rotations. This completes our proof. References [A] L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979. [G] A. W. Goodman, On uniformly convex functions, Ann. Polon. Math. 56 (1991, 87 9. [L] A. E. L i v i n g s t o n, The coefficients of multivalent close-to-convex functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1 (1969, 545 55. [LZ] R. J. Libera and E. J. Z lotkiewicz, Early coefficients of the inverse of a regular convex function, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 85 (198, 5 0.

Uniformly convex functions II 85 [MM] W. M a and D. M i n d a, Uniformly convex functions, Ann. Polon. Math. 57 (199, 165 175. [P] Ch. Pommerenke, Univalent Functions, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1975. [Rø 1 ] F. Rønning, Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 118 (199, 189 196. [Rø ], On starlike functions associated with parabolic regions, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sk lodowska Sect. A 45 (1991, 117 1. [T] S. Y. T r i m b l e, A coefficient inequality for convex univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 48 (1975, 66 67. DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI CINCINNATI, OHIO 451-005 U.S.A. Reçu par la Rédaction le 8.8.199 Révisé le 1..199