Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Physics Thursday February 21, Problem # 1 (10pts) We are given the operator U(m, n) defined by

Similar documents
Theoretical Physics II B Quantum Mechanics. Lecture 5

Quantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra

Physics 215 Quantum Mechanics 1 Assignment 1

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2002 Assignment 3

Linear Algebra using Dirac Notation: Pt. 2

Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

The quantum state as a vector

2 The Density Operator

Coordinate and Momentum Representation. Commuting Observables and Simultaneous Measurements. January 30, 2012

1 Fundamental physical postulates. C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/07 Fall 2007 Lecture 12

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

4.3 Lecture 18: Quantum Mechanics

1 = I I I II 1 1 II 2 = normalization constant III 1 1 III 2 2 III 3 = normalization constant...

Assignment 11 (C + C ) = (C + C ) = (C + C) i(c C ) ] = i(c C) (AB) = (AB) = B A = BA 0 = [A, B] = [A, B] = (AB BA) = (AB) AB

C/CS/Phys 191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell I 10/04/05 Fall 2005 Lecture 11

Ch 125a Problem Set 1

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 1

Angular Momentum set II

1 Traces, Traces Everywhere (5 points)

Solution of Second Midterm Examination Thursday November 09, 2017

Vector spaces and operators

1 Mathematical preliminaries

Quantum Mechanics I Physics 5701

Quantum mechanics in one hour

Chapter 3 Transformations

6.2 Unitary and Hermitian operators

C/CS/Phys C191 Quantum Mechanics in a Nutshell 10/06/07 Fall 2009 Lecture 12

Supplementary information I Hilbert Space, Dirac Notation, and Matrix Mechanics. EE270 Fall 2017

Lecture 10: Eigenvectors and eigenvalues (Numerical Recipes, Chapter 11)

Linear Algebra and Dirac Notation, Pt. 2

Ensembles and incomplete information

Homework assignment 3: due Thursday, 10/26/2017

1 The postulates of quantum mechanics

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Chapter III. Quantum Computation. Mathematical preliminaries. A.1 Complex numbers. A.2 Linear algebra review

Solution Set of Homework # 6 Monday, December 12, Textbook: Claude Cohen Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Franck Laloë, Second Volume

Linear Algebra in Hilbert Space

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 33: Diagonalization of normal operators.

Quantum Physics II (8.05) Fall 2004 Assignment 3

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

The experiment consists of studying the deflection of a beam of neutral ground state paramagnetic atoms (silver) in inhomogeneous magnetic field:

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics

Lecture If two operators A, B commute then they have same set of eigenkets.

2. Introduction to quantum mechanics

Chapter 2. Linear Algebra. rather simple and learning them will eventually allow us to explain the strange results of

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

10 Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

OPERATORS AND MEASUREMENT

YORK UNIVERSITY. Faculty of Science Department of Mathematics and Statistics MATH M Test #2 Solutions

MATH 235. Final ANSWERS May 5, 2015

Recitation 1 (Sep. 15, 2017)

Quantum Mechanics crash course (For the scholar with an higher education in mathematics) Fabio Grazioso :48

Fundamentals and formalism of quantum mechanics

Statistical Interpretation

PHYS Handout 6

Mathematical Introduction

Matrix Representation

Mathematical Methods wk 2: Linear Operators

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

Linear algebra basics

3 Angular Momentum and Spin

Quantum operator methods QM (quantum mouse) version (ALR mods) p. 1

We will discuss matrix diagonalization algorithms in Numerical Recipes in the context of the eigenvalue problem in quantum mechanics, m A n = λ m

Second Quantization: Quantum Fields

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to

8.05, Quantum Physics II, Fall 2013 TEST Wednesday October 23, 12:30-2:00pm You have 90 minutes.

Mathematical Physics Homework 10

SECOND QUANTIZATION PART I

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics: Pt. 1

Lecture notes: Applied linear algebra Part 1. Version 2

Solutions to chapter 4 problems

Lecture notes for Atomic and Molecular Physics, FYSC11, HT Joachim Schnadt

Lecture notes on Quantum Computing. Chapter 1 Mathematical Background

MATHEMATICS 217 NOTES

Prob (solution by Michael Fisher) 1

Quantum Mechanics II (WS 17/18)

Sample Problems on Quantum Dynamics for PHYS301

On common eigenbases of commuting operators

Mathematical Formulation of the Superposition Principle

POSTULATES OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Ir O D = D = ( ) Section 2.6 Example 1. (Bottom of page 119) dim(v ) = dim(l(v, W )) = dim(v ) dim(f ) = dim(v )

Lecture 3. QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR SINGLE QUBIT SYSTEMS 1. Vectors and Operators in Quantum State Space

Quantum Dynamics. March 10, 2017

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Fall Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 5, January 27, 2006

Some Introductory Notes on Quantum Computing

linearly indepedent eigenvectors as the multiplicity of the root, but in general there may be no more than one. For further discussion, assume matrice

A = 3 B = A 1 1 matrix is the same as a number or scalar, 3 = [3].

Outline 1. Real and complex p orbitals (and for any l > 0 orbital) 2. Dirac Notation :Symbolic vs shorthand Hilbert Space Vectors,

Symmetries and particle physics Exercises

Math 489AB Exercises for Chapter 2 Fall Section 2.3

CHAPTER 6: AN APPLICATION OF PERTURBATION THEORY THE FINE AND HYPERFINE STRUCTURE OF THE HYDROGEN ATOM. (From Cohen-Tannoudji, Chapter XII)

This is the important completeness relation,

Math 108b: Notes on the Spectral Theorem

Short Course in Quantum Information Lecture 2

MATH 20F: LINEAR ALGEBRA LECTURE B00 (T. KEMP)

Degenerate Perturbation Theory. 1 General framework and strategy

1 Algebra of State Vectors

Notes on Quantum Mechanics. Finn Ravndal Institute of Physics University of Oslo, Norway

Transcription:

Department of Physics Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Physics 5701 Temple University Z.-E. Meziani Thursday February 1, 017 Problem # 1 10pts We are given the operator Um, n defined by Ûm, n φ m >< φ n 1 where φ n > are the eigenstates of the Hermitian operator Ĥ which could be the Hamiltonian of a system. We also can assume that the states φ n > form an orthonormal basis. Ûm, n following the rules of hermitian conju- a Here we calculate the adjoint Û m, n of gation. Û m, n φ m >< φ n φ n >< φ m ] b We evaluate the commutator [Ĥ, Ûm, n [Ĥ, Ûm, n ] [ ] Ĥ, φ m >< φ n Ĥ φ m >< φ n φ m >< φ n Ĥ since Ĥ is hermitian it can act on a ket or a bra m φ m >< φ n n φ m >< φ n c We want to prove the relation: m n φ m >< φ n m nûm, n Ûm, nû p, q δ nq Ûm, p 4 We start by expanding the product Ûm, nû p, q following the definition of Ûm, n. Ûm, nû p, q φ m >< φ n φ q >< φ p φ m > δ np < φ p δ nq φ m >< φ m where we have used the fact that the φ n > are orthonormal. δ nq Um, p 5

d The definition of the trace of an operator A is T r{â} i Let s evaluate the trace of Ûm, n T r{ûm, n} i i < φ i  φ i > 6 < φ i φ m >< φ n φ i > < φ i φ m >< φ n φ i > i δ im δ ni δ nm 7 e Assume  to be an operator, with matrix elements A mn < φ m  φ n > we want to prove the relation  m,n A mn Ûm, n 8 We start with A mn Um, n < φ m  φ n > φ m >< φ n 9 m,n m,n since A mn is a matrix element it is a scalar, therefore it can be positioned anywhere A mn Um, n φ m >< φ m  φ n >< φ n m,n m,n m,n φ m >< φ m  φ n >< φ n Using the closure relation on the basis { φ n >} we have φ m >< φ m 1 and φ n >< φ n 1 11 m we now replace each of the sums by unity. A mn Um, n φ m >< φ m A φ n >< φ n m,n m,n A mn Um, n ˆ1ˆ1  m,n m 10 1 f Finally we want to show that A pq T r{âû p, q}. Following the definition of the trace. T r{âû p, q} i i < φ i  φ p >< φ q φ i > < φ i  φ p >< φ q φ i > i A ip δ qi A pq 1

Problem # 10pts Consider a physical system whose two dimensional state space is spanned by the orthonormal basis formed by the two kets u 1 >, u >. In this basis the operator ˆσ y is defined by: 0 i 14 i 0 a The matrix ˆσ y is Hermitian because it is a square matrix with real diagonal elements and the off-diagonal elements are complex conjugate of each other. The eigenvalues of this operator are found through solving the secular equation det ˆσ x λî 0 15 This corresponds to λ i i λ λ 1 0 λ +1 and λ 1 16 We find two distinct eigenvalues thus non degenerate. We now solve for the eigenvectors for each eigenvalue. We start with the eigenvalue +1 and and solve for the eigenvector ψ + using the equation 0 i +1 ic i 0 and i i 17 Therefore the eigenvector of ˆσ y corresponding to the eigenvalue +1 is ψ + > u 1 > +i u > 18 < ψ + ψ + > + i 1 1 19 We follow with the eigenvalue 1 and and solve for the eigenvector ψ using the equation 0 i 1 ic i 0 and i i 0 Therefore the eigenvector of Ŝx correponding to the eigenvalue 1 is ψ > u 1 > i u > 1 In summary the two eigenvectors are < ψ ψ > + i 1 1 ψ + > 1 u 1 > +i u > for + 1 ψ > 1 u 1 > i u > for 1 4

b Lets first write the matrix which represent the projector P + ψ + >< ψ + P + 1/ i/ 1/ i/ 1/ i/ i/ 1/ Second we write the matrix which represent the projector P ψ >< ψ P 1/ i/ 1/ i/ 1/ i/ i/ 1/ 5 6 Adding the matrices gives P + + P 1/ i/ i/ 1/ + 1/ i/ i/ 1/ 1 0 0 1 ˆ1 7 Thus satisfies the closure relation. c The matrix M is Hermitian because it is a square matrix with real diagonal elements and the off-diagonal elements are complex conjugate of each other. The eigenvalues of this operator are found through solving the secular equation det ˆM λî 0 8 This corresponds to λ i i λ λ λ 0 6 λ λ + λ 0 λ 5λ + 4 0 9 λ 1, 5 ± 5 16 λ 1 +4 and λ +1 0 We find two distinct eigenvalues thus non degenerate. We now solve for the eigenvectors for each eigenvalue. We start with the eigenvalue +1 and and solve for the eigenvector ψ + using the equation i i +4 c +i 4 and i + 4 i 1 Therefore the eigenvector of ˆM corresponding to the eigenvalue +4 is ψ 1 > u 1 > i u > < ψ 1 ψ 1 > + 1 1 We follow with the eigenvalue +1 and and solve for the eigenvector ψ > using the equation i i 1 + i and i + 4

i 5 Therefore the eigenvector of M corresponding to the eigenvalue +1 is ψ > u 1 > + i u > 6 < ψ ψ > + 1 + 1 In summary the two eigenvectors are 1 ψ 1 > u 1 > i u > ψ > u 1 > + i u > Lets first write the matrix which represents the projector P 1 ψ 1 >< ψ 1 1/ 1/ P 1 i 1/ i / i / / i / / Second we write the matrix which represents the projector P ψ >< ψ / / P i / i / i 1/ 1/ i/ / 1/ Adding the matrices gives 1/ i / P 1 + P i + / / Thus satisfies the closure relation. e Finally we consider the matrix: / i / i/ / 1/ 0 h /i 0 h /i 0 h /i 0 h /i 0 7 for + 4 8 for + 1 9 1 0 0 1 40 41 ˆ1 4 4 To find the eigenvalues we need to solve the secular equation: λ h /i 0 ˆL y i h /i λ h /i 0 i h λ i h/ λ i h/ i h λ i h/ i h/ /i λ 0 λ i h/ λ + 0 0 i h/ λ λ h / + i h i h λ λ λ h / h / λ λ h 0 44

therefore the eigenvalues are: λ 1 + h, λ 0 and λ h 45 Let start to solve for the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue λ 1 + h 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 ˆL y ψ 1 > + h ψ 1 > 46 c + h c 47 i i i i c c i c 48 Therefore the eigenvector of L z corresponding to the eigenvalue + h is ψ 1 > u 1 > +i u > u > 49 < ψ 1 ψ 1 > + + 1 1 ψ 1 > 1 u 1 > +i u > u > 50 51 we follow by solving for the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue λ 0 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 ˆL y ψ 0 > 0 5 c 0 c 5 i 0 i i c 0 i 0 c 0 c 54 Therefore the eigenvector of L z corresponding to the eigenvalue 0 is ψ 0 > u 1 > + u > 55 < ψ 0 ψ 0 > + 1 1 56

ψ 0 > 1/ u 1 > + u > 57 Finally we solve for the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue λ h 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 i h/ 0 ˆL y ψ 1 > h ψ 1 > 58 c h c 59 i i i c i c c i c 60 Therefore the eigenvector of L z corresponding to the eigenvalue h is ψ 1 > u 1 > i u > u > 61 < ψ 1 ψ 1 > + + 1 1 ψ 1 > 1 u 1 > i u > u > 6 6 Problem # 10pts a We consider the two vectors : ψ 0 > 1 u 1 > + i u > 1 u > ψ 1 > 1 u 1 > + i u > 64 First we check the normalization of these kets using the properties of the basis { u 1 >, u >, u >} 1 < ψ 0 ψ 0 > < u 1 i < u + 1 1 < u u 1 > + i u > 1 u > therefore ψ 0 > is normalized. Similarly 1 + 1 4 + 1 4 1 65 < ψ 1 ψ 1 > 1/ < u 1 i/ < u 1/ u 1 > +i/ u > 1 + 1 66 therefore ψ 1 > is not normalized.

b The projector ˆρ 0 onto the state ψ 0 > reads: In the { u 1 >, u >, u >} representation we can write: ˆρ 0 1/ i/ 1/ i/ 1/ 1/ The projector ˆρ 1 onto the state ψ 1 > reads: ˆρ 0 ψ 0 >< ψ 0 67 /4 i /4 /4 i/ /4 1/4 i/4 /4 i/4 1/4 68 ˆρ 1 ψ 1 >< ψ 1 < ψ 1 ψ 1 > 69 In the { u 1 >, u >, u >} representation we can write: ˆρ 1 1 0 i 1 0 i 1 0 i 0 0 0 i 1 0 1 0 i 0 0 0 i 1 0 70 Inspecting the matrices of ˆρ 0 and ˆρ 1 we notice that the diagonal matrix elements are real and that with respect to the diagonal the matrix elements are conjugate of each other. Therefore we conclude that these matrices are Hermitian.