Testing for particles in injectable products

Similar documents
Application of Micro-Flow Imaging (MFI TM ) to The Analysis of Particles in Parenteral Fluids. October 2006 Ottawa, Canada

Simplifying the Process: Automated USP 643 / EP

ORTHOGONAL PARTICLE CHARACTERIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR BIO-APPLICATIONS: AN INTRODUCTION TO DLS (DYNAMIC LIGHT SCATTERING), NTA (NANOPARTICLE

Pharmaceutical Particulate Matter

HACCP Concept. Overview of HACCP Principles. HACCP Principles. Preliminary Tasks Development of the HACCP Plan

Overview of HACCP Principles. OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service Agriculture Analytical Service

The Elzone II Particle Count and Size Analyzer

Fundamentals of Particle Counting

Control of Particulate Matter Contamination in Healthcare Manufacturing

White Paper. Perform Conductivity Measurements In Compliance with USP <645>

Elemental Scientific. Spike Recovery. Elemental Scientific

2. Pharmaceutical industry

Regulatory and Alternative Analytical Procedures are defined as follows 2 :

2. Pharmaceutical industry

Food Safety and Quality Management System

Swiss Medic Training Sampling

EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE Sterile Products and Compounding

Determination of particle size distribution Single particle light interaction methods. Part 4:

COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS

Setting Attainable and Practical Particle Size Specifications

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Compact Orifice FlowMeter

ITS. One of the highest resolutions for particle sizing and counting. Multisizer 3 COULTER COUNTER SCIENCE

Particle Analysis at the Touch of a Button. Litesizer series

Stage 4 G-03: CONDUCTIVITY OF SOLUTIONS CP: USP. May 2015 INTRODUCTION

Practical Pharmaceutical Technology I USP Dissolution Method for PARACETAMOL 500 mg Tablets Section No. 6 Group D

The end of. mass-speculation. MS Certified Vials Pre-cleaned and certified vials for mass spectrometry

QbD QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENTS OF CQAS IN SOLID DOSAGE FORM UNIT OPERATIONS

Introduction to E&Ls 1

MODULE 2B INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM (IHLAP) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

CDER Risk Assessment to Evaluate Potential Risks from the Use of Nanomaterials in Drug Products

PTG-NIR Powder Characterisation System (not yet released for selling to end users)

Particle Size Analysis in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Using cold vapor generation atomic absorption to determine mercury impurities in pharmaceutical products

Development of an Automatic Sampling Module to Monitor Concentration of Liquid-Borne Nanoparticles

429 LIGHT DIFFRACTION MEASUREMENT OF PARTICLE SIZE

Traceable UV-Vis Reference Materials

X-Ray Net Weight Control of Pharmaceutical Products

Approval Block. Prepared by: Signature Date Evan Parnell 08 NOV Reviewed by: Signature Date. Approved by: Signature Date

Particle Size and Shape Analysis in PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY.

LABORATORY EXERCISE: USING SPECTROPHOTOMETRY FOR QUALITY CONTROL: NIACIN

BECKMAN COULTER QbD1200 Total Organic Carbon Analyzer Critical Measurements Made Simple

Enquiry. Demonstration of Uniformity of Dosage Units using Large Sample Sizes. Proposal for a new general chapter in the European Pharmacopoeia

PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION IONSCAN LS

ZS90. The ultimate in desktop particle characterization. Particle size. Zeta potential. Molecular weight

Industrie pharmaceutique

Pharmaceutical Active Ingredients Group Standard 2017 HSR100425

Elemental Scientific. Spike Recovery. Elemental Scientific

DDefense. MMetals. Marie C. Vicéns

The solution for all of your

CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE EMERGING ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZATION OF SUB-VISIBLE PARTICLES

QSM 5.1 FAQs. For a test with a recommended maximum holding time measured in hours, the holding time shall be tracked by the hour.

Food Safety Regulations

Measuring Technology for the Pharmaceutical Industry. Pharma

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Particle Analysis at the Touch of a Button. Litesizer series

Test Method Development and Validation as Pertaining to Microtrac Particle Size Measuring Instruments

An Automated Application Template for Dissolution Studies

THE USE OF IONISING RADIATION IN THE MANUFACTURE OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Quantitative Analysis and Identification of Migrants in Food Packaging Using LC-MS/MS

ISO STANDARD INTERNATIONAL. Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments Part 1: Classification of air cleanliness

Quantitative Analysis of Caffeine in Energy Drinks by High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Lecture 22: PHARMACY CALCULATIONS for Technicians Preparing Injectable Medications

CONTINUOUS FLOW CHEMISTRY (PROCESSING) FOR INTERMEDIATES AND APIs

STUDY OF THE APPLICABILTY OF CONTENT UNIFORMITY AND DISSOLUTION VARIATION TEST ON ROPINIROLE HYDROCHLORIDE TABLETS

S8 TIGER Series 2 for ASTM D 6443

General Information Regarding The Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 [Title VII of Public Law ]

Guideline/SOP: Handling of Laboratory Gross Errors/Data History

Technical Procedure for General Laboratory Equipment

SECTION D.2 AMMONIA NITROGEN

A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation, (Eurachem).

PYRIPROXYFEN TECHNICAL

TSI AEROTRAK REMOTE 4-20 ma SENSORS LIFE SCIENCE

Elemental Scientific. Stability. Elemental Scientific

Maintenance with OQ. ZEEnit 700. Operational Qualification OQ within the scope of a maintenance for the. Atomic Absorption Spectrometer

Online Reaction Monitoring of In-Process Manufacturing Samples by UPLC

Humidity Calibration Solutions

Method validation for laser diffraction measurements

VALIDATION OF A UPLC METHOD FOR A BENZOCAINE, BUTAMBEN, AND TETRACAINE HYDROCHLORIDE TOPICAL SOLUTION

Application Note PB 401. Improve HPLC Sample Preparation in an Analytical Laboratory A New Automated Sample Preparation Process

2015 IASH Particle Count Limits Recommendation for Aviation Fuel

Hazard Communication for Dangerous and Harmful Materials

Analytical & Solid State Services. June 2017

Biochrom Libra. UV-Visible Spectrophotometers. High performance instruments with added application value for academia, research and industry

Chapter 4: Verification of compendial methods

The integration of NeSSI with Continuous Flow Reactors and PAT for Process Optimization

Standardization of Optical Particle Counters

Stability of pharmaceutical preparations

Assay Transfer from HPLC to UPLC for Higher Analysis Throughput

Technical Procedure for Concentration Determination of Methamphetamine in Liquids via HPLC

Quantos GraviPrep. Bye Bye, ml Hello, Quantos

Fusion UV/Persulfate TOC Analyzer

The Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceutical Products Using GC-VUV and Static Headspace

Quality by Design and Analytical Methods

NaturalFacts. Introducing our team. New product announcements, specials and information from New Roots Herbal. April 2009

MultiVap8: Automated concentration system

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

Agilent Solutions for Traditional Medicine. Ramaswami.R, General Manager-CAG Agilent Technologies India.

Mercury Stack Monitor SM-4

Characterization of protein aggregates in suspension and on a filter membrane by Morphologically-Directed Raman Spectroscopy

Transcription:

Testing for particles in injectable products 20-Nov-2018 MONITORING PHARMACEUTICALS Liquid sample technology that is compliant with USP <788> must be part of any testing strategy into winning the war on contaminants within parenteral injectables. Jason Kelly, VP of Services, Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions, explains the technology and why companies should use it We are all too well aware of the adverse effects of particulate matter contamination within parenteral injectable pharmaceutical products and the consequences for patient safety. Here, particulate matter refers to the small, subvisible particles. The United States Pharmacopoeia, USP <788> provides two tests for detecting such particulates: light obscuration and microscopic assay. Both are generally accepted for use in testing large volume parenteral (LVP) and small volume parenteral (SVP) for the determination of subvisible particulate matter. Normally, samples are first tested by the light obscuration method. If the sample fails the specified limits, the microscopic assay method can then be used.

Injectable drug products must undergo several discrete processes allowing them to meet or exceed standards developed by the USP that are enforced by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Particulate matter in injections is defined as extraneous, mobile, undissolved particles, unintentionally present in the end product. These contaminants can come from several sources such as the environment, packaging materials, cleanroom personnel and formulation ingredients. Particulate matter can be extremely harmful when introduced into the bloodstream and can cause adverse reactions in the patient, such as vein irritation, local tissue infarction, anaphylactic shock and even death. Most injectable products are not thermally sterilised, which can present a concerning risk that must be mitigated for patient safety. USP <788> places limits on the amount of subvisible particles that are allowed in injections. The USP limits on particulate matter, harmonised with the European Pharmacopoeia (EP) and Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP), are outlined in USP <788> Particulate Matter in Injections. Advances in particle counter liquid sampling technology for light obscuration and sampling software have made the testing process less tedious and more automated. With the advantage of 21CFR Part 11 (part of the Title 21 in the Code of Federal Regulations that establishes the FDA regulations on electronic records and electronic signatures), sampling software and data integrity with audit trails built-in, particle counter technology is more cgmp compatible. It is essential, however, to understand how this technology meets USP <788> and why injectable drugs manufacturers should use it. Like this story? Subscribe to Cleanroom Technology for incisive analysis of the latest news and developments in hi-tech industries manufacturing in controlled environments. Particle counter liquid sampling: how it works Light obscuration is the method of choice listed in the pharmacopoeias for the analysis of subvisible particles in parenteral products. The sample is drawn into the system's sensor through a needle or sample tube. Particles passing a laser beam block a certain amount of light and produce a shadow on a light-sensitive detector. The area of this shadow is then converted to the equivalent diameter of the particle.

Liquid Particle Counter used for USP 788 batch sampling Current methods for light obscuration require a sample volume of 25ml. As to the number of individual units to be tested for LVP and SVP units having a volume of 25ml or more, the USP <788> states that it depends on "statistically sound sampling plans". It further states that: "sampling plans should be based on consideration of product volume, numbers of particles historically found to be present in comparison to limits, particle size distribution of particles present, and variability of particle counts between units." The USP <788> also suggests that the total number of units tested for any given batch may be less than 10 units (for LVP and pooled SVPs) with proper justification. The liquid particle counter withdraws three samples of not less than 5ml and can calculate the average cumulative counts, average differential counts, average cumulative counts per ml, and average differential counts per ml. Per the USP <788>, it will automatically omit the data from the first run. The size ranges used for USP <788> testing are 10 and 25 μm. Liquid particle counters are capable of sizing and counting particles ranging from 2μm to 200μm.

USP <788> Validation Comparison of USP, JP and EP LVI and SVI sample Validation of the liquid particle counter is required every six months. The most common validation materials used in the industry are known as Count-Cal particles, which are manufactured by Thermo Scientific. Count-Cal particles feature the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable diameters, enabling manufacturers of parenteral drugs and injectable solutions to calibrate and document the reproducibility of liquid particle counting instruments. The Count-Cal particles come with an accuracy of 3000/ml ±10%. The validation testing requires the liquid particle counter undergo several validation tests. Validation requirements and USP <788> The Liquid Particle Counter must be calibrated at customer location in-situ and not moved from that location. Calibration and USP <788> validation intervals are on a 6- month cycle. The basic validation requirements include: Sample volume verification Volume accuracy test Sample flow rate verification Sensor calibration Sensor resolution test (10µm test particles) Count ratio test: blank test using clean, particle-free water Count ratio test: 15µm Count-Cal reference particles (3000/ml ±10%)

The verification of the validation is acknowledged when the liquid particle counter passes the count ratio test using 15µm particles. The corresponding counts should fall within 2,700 and 3,300 particles. The validation testing allows for a ±10% tolerance at 3,000 per millilitre. It is a simple but effective validation of the accuracy of the liquid particle counter sensor. Overview of Count-Cal reference particles used to validate liquid particle counters. Photo courtesy of Thermo Scientific In summary, the USP <788> and other pharmacopoeia standards for testing particulate matter are an important line of defence in managing the safety and quality of injectable products. By building quality testing into the processes, manufacturers can combat the environment in which sterile products are manufactured and keep patient safety a top priority.