NEEDLES S STREET LEVEE SYSTEM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID #

Similar documents
SAN JACINTO RIVER / BAUTISTA CREEK LEVEE SYSTEM RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD ID #

CCR Rule Annual Inspection Report (cont.) 2

Delaware Bay Dikes Repair and Prevention Project Preliminary Design for New Castle Dikes

Sacramento River Bank Protection Project

CHAPTER FIVE: THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI REGION AND PLAQUEMINES PARISH

Limited Visual Dam Safety Inspections OA Oahu Reservoir No Oahu, Hawaii

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

TAKING THE MYSTERY OUT OF USACE S ER DRILLING IN EARTH EMBANKMENT DAMS AND LEVEES

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

Attachment 3: Fragility Curve Determinations DRAFT

NEWS RELEASE UNDER SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (33 USC 1344) ACTION NUMBER SPA ABQ

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Specifications Whitcomb Elementary School Demolition January 15, 2016

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

CHAPTER SEVEN: THE NEW ORLEANS EAST PROTECTED AREA

Saganashkee Slough - McMahon Woods Section 506 Great Lakes Fishery & Ecosystem Restoration Study

2014 San Gabriel Valley Water Forum. October 2, 2014

Red River Levee Panel

Appendix I. Dredged Volume Estimates. Draft Contractor Document: Subject to Continuing Agency Review

Amistad Dam Investigation and Oversight: Karst- Founded Dam on the USA-Mexico Border

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND. July 18, Alberta Infrastructure & Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

Erosion Information Paper Eagle City and Eagle Village, Alaska Current as of January 21, 2008

Analysis of Hydraulic Impacts on the Schuylkill River

20217 CLEAR STONE TON $14.20 $5, $ $ $ %

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the BAP is consistent with recognized and generally accepted good engineering standards.

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

OVERVIEW OF ER DRILLING IN EARTH EMBANKMENT DAMS AND

Construction complete on all HSDRRS projects across storm evacuation routes

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Tata Pond Dam

APPENDIX A M&T/Llano Seco Long-Term Water Reliability Study These photos are examples of rock spurs in use throughout the United States

IMPORTANCE OF GEOLOGIC CHARACTERIZATION FOR LEVEE FOUNDATION AND BORROW MATERIALS AS STUDIED AT THE INDIAN GRAVES LEVEE DISTRICT, ADAMS COUNTY, IL

Background and Purpose of Meeting. River Towers Meeting. Flood Risk Management Study Alternatives Overview

Certification Process for North Indio East Side Dike in the Coachella Valley

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request

Rock Sizing for Waterway & Gully Chutes

January 16, Re: Soo Line Dump Site 2018 Annual Soil Cover Inspection. Dear Mr. Nichols:

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

Bank stabilization by redirective structures on the Santa Clara River, Ventura County, CA

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

Project (Project No. US-CA-62-2) Maintenance Inspection and Reports (Subtask 14.1) Inspection Report No.2

CHAPTER GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS Applicability Regulations.

B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

Long Valley Meadow Restoration Project

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND SEISMICITY

An Evaluation of Pavement Drainage Interstate 64, Rowan-Carter Counties

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE DCP MIDSTREAM THREE RIVERS PLANT TO CGP 51 PROJECT IN LIVE OAK COUNTY, TEXAS

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

4.9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Appendix E Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping

Community Erosion Assessment Napakiak, Alaska 15 January 2008

October 26, Ms. Aimee Zack Canadian Pacific 120 S. Sixth Street Suite 900 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

DRAFT. PRELIMINARY LANDSLIDE MODELING for KRAMER AVENUE LANDSLIDE SITKA, ALASKA. Prepared for: Andrew Friske 210 Kramer Ave. Sitka, Alaska 99835

Erosion Information Paper - Barrow, Alaska Current as of September 14, 2007

Selected Site BMPs: Why s the Water Muddy? John C. Hayes, Ph.D., P. E. Biosystems Engineering Clemson University

MIDDLESEX COUNTY Department of Planning and Community Development P.O. Box 427, Saluda, VA Phone: Fax:

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

APPENDIX B DESIGN CRITERIA FOR TEMPORARY WATER QUALITY BMPS USED DURING CONSTRUCTION

Low Low Water in Puget Sound vs. Mean Sea Level. What do the flood event gauge readings at Sedro Woolley really mean?

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Colorado Ice Jams and CRREL s Ice Jam Database CRREL Ice Engineering Group

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT


White River Update. Jeanne Stypula, Supervising Engineer. Advisory Committee Meeting April 26, 2016

20217 CLEAR STONE TON $14.20 $5, $ $ $ %

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 OBSERVATIONS EBA FILE: W nd Avenue Whitehorse, YT Y1A 1C2. Attention:

MORGAN COUNTY COLORADO, AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Flooding Performance Indicator Summary. Performance indicator: Flooding impacts on riparian property for Lake Ontario and the Upper St.

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Rock Sizing for Batter Chutes

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Advanced Geologic Exploration, Inc.

Los Angeles Unified School District Secondary Mathematics Branch

Suitable Applications Sediment traps should be considered for use:

Appendix C Fluvial Flood Hazards

Local Flood Hazards. Click here for Real-time River Information

LEVEE DESIGN FOR FLOOD PROTECTION ON ALLUVIAL FANS

Rock Sizing for Small Dam Spillways

DAM SAFETY PROGRAM DAM INSPECTION REPORT FORM FOR REGULATORY INSPECTION

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6-0 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT. for SR 3062, SECTION 29S STRASBURG ROAD.

Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District 109 St. Joseph Street, Mobile, Alabama Prepared by:

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

QGIS FLO-2D Integration

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Inspection Checklist N. SIDE OF HWY. 20-W.OF FREEPT

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE GUIDE

LOGAN

Redwood City Harbor, California, Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study. Appendix D. Geotechnical Engineering. DRAFT April 2015

INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE

Former Guterl Specialty Steel Site

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

Transcription:

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID # 3805030008 PERIODIC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 1 GENERALIZED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FINAL SYSTEM RATING: MINIMALLY ACCEPTABLE FINAL RATING DATE: AUGUST 2014 PERIODIC INSPECTION REPORT PREPARED BY TETRA TECH FOR THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT SUBMITTED: JANUARY 2014 INSPECTED: JULY 27, 2011 AND OCTOBER 24, 2012

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Executive Summary provides an introduction to the periodic inspection (PI), an overview of the Needles S Street Levee System, a summary of the major findings of the periodic inspection, and the overall rating for the system. 1.1 Scope and Purpose of Periodic Inspections The purpose of this levee system periodic inspection is to identify deficiencies that pose hazards to human life or property. The inspection is intended to identify the issues in order to facilitate future studies and associated repairs as appropriate. This assessment of the general condition of the Needles S Street Levee System is based on available data and visual inspections. Detailed investigation and analysis involving hydrologic design, topographic mapping, subsurface investigations, testing, and detailed computational evaluations are beyond the scope of this levee system inspection. 1.2 System Summary Needles S Street Levee System is located in the County of San Bernardino, California. Needles S Street Levee System is comprised of three levee segments: Eagle Pass Levee Segment, Needles 1 Levee Segment, and Needles 2 Levee Segment. The National Levee Database Number (NLD No.) for the Needles S Street Levee System is 3805030008. Eagle Pass Levee Segment is located in an unincorporated area approximately 6 miles southwest of the City of Needles. Eagle Pass Levee Segment serves to intercept and deflect the Standard Project Flood (SPF) into and along S Street Wash; then into Airport Wash, which flows into the Colorado River south of the City of Needles. Eagle Pass Levee Segment includes two deflection levees and one diversion levee. Each deflection levee is 400 feet in length, and the diversion levee is 1,250 feet in length. Needles S Street Levee System was federally authorized and subsequently constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District (USACE LAD). Needles S Street Levee System is now entirely operated and maintained by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (hereinafter the County ). The NLD No. for the Eagle Pass Levee Segment is 3804030009. Needles 1 Levee Segment is located in the City of Needles. Needles 1 Levee Segment forms a collector levee that collects runoff along the Sidewinder Wash and the S Street Wash, and then funnels this runoff into the S Street Channel. The inspection limits were redefined to include a portion of the S Street Channel that has a levee embankment on the landward side. The inspection limits were redefined to include the left/west half of the S Street Channel from the channel inlet to the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe (ATSF) railroad bridge, a distance of 523 feet. The S Street Channel is a reinforced concrete rectangular channel, with compacted fill behind the channel wall. The compacted fill behind the channel wall was treated as a levee embankment for inspection and reporting purposes. Needles 1 Levee Segment was federally authorized and subsequently constructed by the USACE LAD. It is now entirely operated and maintained by the County. The NLD No. for Needles 1 Levee Segment is 3804010032. Needles 2 Levee Segment is located in the City of Needles. Needles 2 Levee Segment forms a collector levee that collects runoff along the S Street Wash and funnels it into the S Street Channel. The inspection limits were redefined to include a portion of the S Street Channel that Page 2 of 5

has a levee embankment on the landward side. The inspection limits were redefined to include the right/east half of the S Street Channel from the inlet to the ATSF railroad bridge, a distance of 516 feet. The S Street Channel is a reinforced concrete rectangular channel, with compacted fill behind the channel wall. The compacted fill behind the channel wall was treated as a levee embankment for inspection and reporting purposes. Needles 2 Levee Segment was federally authorized and subsequently constructed by the USACE LAD. It is now entirely operated and maintained by the County. The NLD No. for Needles 2 Levee Segment is 3804010031. The Needles S Street Leveed Area is shown in Figure 1. 1.3 Summary of Major Deficiencies Found The periodic inspection of the Eagle Pass Levee Segment was conducted on October 24, 2012. The local sponsor representatives met with the inspection team and assisted with granting access along the length of the levee. The periodic inspection of the Needles 1 Levee Segment and Needles 2 Levee Segment was conducted on July 27, 2011. During the inspection of the levee system, deficiencies were noted for which remedial actions are required. The following main deficiencies of the project features were noted during the periodic inspection: Eagle Pass Levee Segment: o Erosion has occurred at the toe of the riverward slope along both Deflection Levee 1 and Deflection Levee 2. The erosion threatens the stability and integrity of the levees. o Erosion gullies up to 36 inches in depth were observed along the Eagle Pass Diversion Levee. Needles 1 Levee Segment: o Significant vegetation growth (brush, tall grass, and trees with trunks greater than 2 inches in diameter) was present within the vegetation-free zone. The vegetation-free zone extends 15 feet outward from both the landward and riverward toes of the levee. o There was an unauthorized earthen access ramp constructed over the grouted stone revetment on the riverward slope. o For a horizontal distance of 50 feet, the backfill located over the toe of the riverward slope, as shown in the as-built drawings, was excavated and was pushed up onto the riverward slope. This unauthorized activity has exposed the toe-down protection. o Due to the concentration of local runoff, erosion gullies greater than 6 inches in depth were present on the landward slope. o For a horizontal distance of 250 feet, the centerline of the levee crown was observed to be as much as 12 inches lower than the top of the grouted stone revetment. It appeared that the material on the crown had been pushed to the landward edge of the levee crown. o The chain-link fence located along the top of the channel was damaged. Needles 2 Levee Segment: o Significant vegetation growth (brush, tall grass, and trees with trunks greater than 2 inches in diameter) was present within the vegetation-free zone. The vegetation-free zone extends 15 feet outward from both the landward and riverward toes of the levee. Page 3 of 5

o There was an unauthorized earthen access ramp constructed over the grouted stone revetment on the riverward slope. o Due to the concentration of local runoff, an erosion gully greater than 6 inches in depth was present on the landward slope. 1.4 Overall Rating The Levee Safety Out-Brief Meeting was held on August 7, 2013. An engineering determination has concluded that the observed deficiencies would not prevent the system from performing as intended during the next significant runoff event. Therefore, the Levee Safety Officer (LSO), Los Angeles District, has determined the overall system rating to be Minimally Acceptable. A Minimally Acceptable system rating is defined as, One or more items are rated Minimally Acceptable or one or more items are rated Unacceptable and an engineering determination concludes that the Unacceptable items would not prevent the segment/system from performing as intended during the next significant runoff event. The local sponsor will be notified of the overall rating of the levee system by letter with instructions to correct the Unacceptable rated items as soon as possible, not to exceed two years, and to correct the Minimally Acceptable rated items so that they do not deteriorate further and become Unacceptable. Page 4 of 5

Legend - Eagle Pass Levee Segment - Needles 1 Levee Segment - Needles 2 Levee Segment D Needles "S" Street Levee System Leveed Area (NLD v3.0 June 2013) Figure 1: Needles S Street Levee System Page 5 of 5