Deterministic Operations Research, ME 366Q and ORI 391 Chapter 2: Homework #2 Solutions

Similar documents
56:171 Operations Research Midterm Exam - October 26, 1989 Instructor: D.L. Bricker

Welcome to CPSC 4850/ OR Algorithms

2. Linear Programming Problem

Study Unit 3 : Linear algebra

Simplex tableau CE 377K. April 2, 2015

Optimization Methods in Management Science

Transportation Problem

5.3 Linear Programming in Two Dimensions: A Geometric Approach

Optimization Methods in Management Science

MATH 445/545 Homework 1: Due February 11th, 2016

12-1. Example 1: Which relations below represent functions? State the domains and ranges. a) {(9,81), (4,16), (5,25), ( 2,4), ( 6,36)} Function?

56:171 Fall 2002 Operations Research Quizzes with Solutions

ISE 330 Introduction to Operations Research: Deterministic Models. What is Linear Programming? www-scf.usc.edu/~ise330/2007. August 29, 2007 Lecture 2

Optimisation. 3/10/2010 Tibor Illés Optimisation

Lecture 6: Sections 2.2 and 2.3 Polynomial Functions, Quadratic Models


Optimization Methods in Management Science

56:171 Operations Research Fall 1998

56:171 Operations Research Midterm Exam--15 October 2002

Introduction to Operations Research Economics 172A Winter 2007 Some ground rules for home works and exams:

Introduction to Operations Research. Linear Programming

UNIT-4 Chapter6 Linear Programming

Introduction to Operations Research

Chapter 3 Introduction to Linear Programming PART 1. Assoc. Prof. Dr. Arslan M. Örnek

Optimization Methods in Management Science

LP Definition and Introduction to Graphical Solution Active Learning Module 2

ORI 390Q Models and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems First Exam, fall 1994

UNIVERSITY of LIMERICK

LINEAR PROGRAMMING MODULE Part 1 - Model Formulation INTRODUCTION

Linear Programming. H. R. Alvarez A., Ph. D. 1

Linear programming I João Carlos Lourenço

56:270 Final Exam - May

IP Cut Homework from J and B Chapter 9: 14, 15, 16, 23, 24, You wish to solve the IP below with a cutting plane technique.

Worked Examples for Chapter 5

Graph the linear inequality. 1) x + 2y 6

SEN301 OPERATIONS RESEARCH I LECTURE NOTES

Introduction. Formulating LP Problems LEARNING OBJECTIVES. Requirements of a Linear Programming Problem. LP Properties and Assumptions

Linear Programming. Formulating and solving large problems. H. R. Alvarez A., Ph. D. 1

Review Questions, Final Exam

Graphical and Computer Methods

Econ 172A, Fall 2012: Final Examination Solutions (I) 1. The entries in the table below describe the costs associated with an assignment

SECTION 5.1: Polynomials

IE 5531: Engineering Optimization I

Practice Questions for Math 131 Exam # 1

Linear Programming Test Review. Day 6

Concept and Definition. Characteristics of OR (Features) Phases of OR

Sensitivity Analysis and Duality in LP

Linear Programming Inverse Projection Theory Chapter 3

The use of shadow price is an example of sensitivity analysis. Duality theory can be applied to do other kind of sensitivity analysis:

Econ 172A, Fall 2012: Final Examination Solutions (II) 1. The entries in the table below describe the costs associated with an assignment

Introduction. Very efficient solution procedure: simplex method.

9.5 THE SIMPLEX METHOD: MIXED CONSTRAINTS

Lecture 5 Simplex Method. September 2, 2009

min 4x 1 5x 2 + 3x 3 s.t. x 1 + 2x 2 + x 3 = 10 x 1 x 2 6 x 1 + 3x 2 + x 3 14

3E4: Modelling Choice

II. Analysis of Linear Programming Solutions

Linear programming. Debrecen, 2015/16, 1st semester. University of Debrecen, Faculty of Business Administration 1 / 46

OPERATIONS RESEARCH. Michał Kulej. Business Information Systems

Applications of Systems of Linear Inequalities

Section 4.1 Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities

OPTIMIZATION UNDER CONSTRAINTS

Linear Programming Test Review. Day 6

COT 6936: Topics in Algorithms! Giri Narasimhan. ECS 254A / EC 2443; Phone: x3748

Chapter 4 The Simplex Algorithm Part I

Slack Variable. Max Z= 3x 1 + 4x 2 + 5X 3. Subject to: X 1 + X 2 + X x 1 + 4x 2 + X X 1 + X 2 + 4X 3 10 X 1 0, X 2 0, X 3 0

Econ 172A, Fall 2012: Final Examination (I) 1. The examination has seven questions. Answer them all.

MS-E2140. Lecture 1. (course book chapters )

UNIVERSITY OF KWA-ZULU NATAL

System of Linear Equations. Slide for MA1203 Business Mathematics II Week 1 & 2

Bilinear Programming: Applications in the Supply Chain Management

Linear Programming Duality

MS-E2140. Lecture 1. (course book chapters )

Exam 3 Review Math 118 Sections 1 and 2

Chap6 Duality Theory and Sensitivity Analysis

The Graphical Method & Algebraic Technique for Solving LP s. Métodos Cuantitativos M. En C. Eduardo Bustos Farías 1

Econ 8208 Homework 2 Due Date: May 7

F 1 F 2 Daily Requirement Cost N N N

MODELING (Integer Programming Examples)

Review for Final Review

Stochastic Optimization

Operations Research. Duality in linear programming.

Dual Basic Solutions. Observation 5.7. Consider LP in standard form with A 2 R m n,rank(a) =m, and dual LP:

If C(x) is the total cost (in dollars) of producing x items of a product, then

Linear programming: introduction and examples

Nonlinear Programming (Hillier, Lieberman Chapter 13) CHEM-E7155 Production Planning and Control

Demo 1: Solving LP problem graphically and with Excel Solver

Spring 2018 IE 102. Operations Research and Mathematical Programming Part 2

The Transportation Problem

Name: Section Registered In:

1 Answer Key for exam2162sp07 vl

ECE 307- Techniques for Engineering Decisions

Dr. S. Bourazza Math-473 Jazan University Department of Mathematics

The Simplex Method. Formulate Constrained Maximization or Minimization Problem. Convert to Standard Form. Convert to Canonical Form

SELECT TWO PROBLEMS (OF A POSSIBLE FOUR) FROM PART ONE, AND FOUR PROBLEMS (OF A POSSIBLE FIVE) FROM PART TWO. PART ONE: TOTAL GRAND

LINEAR PROGRAMMING: A GEOMETRIC APPROACH. Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

SAMPLE QUESTIONS. b = (30, 20, 40, 10, 50) T, c = (650, 1000, 1350, 1600, 1900) T.

The Transportation Problem

MVE165/MMG630, Applied Optimization Lecture 6 Integer linear programming: models and applications; complexity. Ann-Brith Strömberg

Example: 1. In this chapter we will discuss the transportation and assignment problems which are two special kinds of linear programming.

The Simplex Method of Linear Programming

Transcription:

Deterministic Operations Research, ME 366Q and ORI 391 Chapter 2: Homework #2 Solutions 11. Consider the following linear program. Maximize z = 6x 1 + 3x 2 subject to x 1 + 2x 2 2x 1 + x 2 20 x 1 x 2 x 1 + x 2 3 Sketch the feasible region and several isovalue contours for the objective function in the (x 1,x 2 )-space. Show the optimal solution on the graph. x 2 Z = 36 Z = 60 Note that the objective function line is parallel to the second constraint. All feasible points on that constraint line are alternative optima. 0 0 x 1 12. Ten jobs are to be completed by three men during the next week. Each man works a 40- hour week. The times for the men to complete the jobs are shown in the table below. The values in the cells assume that each job is completed by a single person; however, jobs can be shared with completion times being determined proportionally. If no entry exists in a particular cell, it means that the corresponding job cannot be performed by the corresponding person. Set up and solve a linear programming model that will determine the optimal assignment of men to jobs. The goal is to minimize the total time required to complete all the jobs. - 1 -

Man \ Task 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A 7 3 18 13 6 9 B 12 5 12 4 22 17 13 C 18 6 8 19 8 15 VARIABLE DEFINITIONS x ij : Proportion of job j performed by man i, for i = A, B, C, and j = 1,...,. Variables should be defined for only the man-job combinations not eliminated with a dash in the table. Thus there are 20 variables in the problem. CONSTRAINTS Each man can only work 40 hours. Man A: + 7x A2 + 3x A3 +18x A6 +13x A7 + 6x A8 + 9x A 40 Man B: +12x B1 + 5x B2 +12x B4 + 4x B5 +22x B6 +17x B8 +13x B9 40 Man C: +18x C1 + 6x C3 + 8x C4 +x C5 +19x C7 + 8x C9 +15x C 40 Each job must be done. TASK1: x B1 + x C1 = 1 TASK: x A + x C = 1 NONNEGATIVITY AND SIMPLE UPPER BOUNDS OBJECTIVE FUNCTION 0 x ij 1 for all i and j for which variables are defined. MINIMIZE: Total time required for the jobs. Min z = 7x A2 + 3x A3 + 18x A6 + 13x A7 + 6x A8 + 9x A 12x B1 + 5x B2 + 12x B4 + 4x B5 + 22x B6 + 17x B8 + 13x B9 18x C1 + 6x C3 + 8x C4 + x C5 + 19x C7 + 8x C9 +1 5x C Assignment Value: z = 88-2 -

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Man A 0 1 0.5 1 1 1 Man B 1 1 0 1.5 0 0 Man C 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Hours Dual Man A 40 0.22 Man B 32 0 Man C 16 0 13. A company has two manufacturing plants (A and B) and three sales outlets (I, II, and III). Shipping costs from the plants to the outlets are as follows. Outlet Plant I II III A 4 6 8 B 7 4 3 The company wants to plan production, shipping and sales for the next two periods. The data for the periods is shown below. The plants can store products produced in one period for sale in the next. The maximum storage at each plant is 50 and the inventory cost is $1 per unit. Find the solution that maximizes profit. Plant A Manufacturing data Plant B Period Unit cost ($) Capacity Unit cost ($) Capacity 1 8 175 7 200 2 150 8 170 Selling price ($) Demand Data Maximum sales Period I II III I II III 1 15 20 14 0 200 150 2 18 17 21 150 300 150-3 -

Variables P1A, P1B, P2A, P2B: production at A and B in the two periods S11, S21, S31: sales in period 1 at three locations S12, S22, S32: sales in period 2 at three locations x1a1, x1a2, x1a3, x1b1, x1b2, x1b3: shipments in period 1 x2a1, x2a2, x2a3, x2b1, x2b2, x2b3: shipments in period 2 IA, IB: Inventory storage at A and B Max profit: Z = 15S11 + 20S21 + sales revenue 8P1A 7P1B production costs 4x1A1 6x1A2 8x1A3 transportation costs 1IA 1IB Conservation constraints and upper limits on variables (see Excel spreadsheet) Solution Profit: Z = $4450-4 -

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U Linear Model Name: E_13 Solver: Jensen LP/IP Ph. 1 Iter. TRUE Type: LP1 Type: Linear Total Iter. 26 FALSE Change Goal: Max Sens.: No Comp. Time 00:01 TRUE Profit: 4450 Side: No Status Optimal FALSE Solve FALSE Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 0 Change Relation Name: P1A P1B S11 S12 S13 X1A1 X1A2 X1A3 X1B1 X1B2 X1B3 I1A I1B P2A 0 Values: 175 200 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 125 0 0 75 150 0 Lower Bounds: 0 0 0 0 60 Upper Bounds: 175 200 0 200 150 000 000 000 000 000 000 0 0 150 Linear Obj. Coef.: -8-7 15 20 14-4 -6-8 -7-4 -3-1 -1 - Constraints Num. Name Value Rel. RHS Linear Constraint Coefficients 1 A1 0 = 0 1 0 0 0 0-1 -1-1 0 0 0-1 0 0 2 B1 0 = 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0-1 -1-1 0-1 0 3 S11 0 = 0 0 0-1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 S12 0 = 0 0 0 0-1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 S13 0 = 0 0 0 0 0-1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 A2 0 = 0 0 1 0 1 7 B2 0 = 0 0 0 1 0 8 S21 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 9 S22 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 S23 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 PA PB S1 S2 S3 XA1 XA2 XA3 XB1 XB2 XB3 IA IB Period 1 175 200 0 200 0 0 75 0 0 125 0 0 75 Period 2 150 170 150 95 150 150 0 0 0 95 150 The two rows give a table with the numeric solution to the problem. Period 1 shows the decisions in period 1 and Period 2 shows the decisions in period 2. For example, the 175 in the upper left corner (cell 1,1) means that 175 units of A are produced in period 1. - 5 -

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 P2B S21 S22 S23 X2A1 X2A2 X2A3 X2B1 X2B2 X2B3 170 150 95 150 150 0 0 0 95 150 170 150 300 150 000 000 000 000 000 000-8 18 17 21-4 -6-8 -7-4 -3 0 0 0 0-1 -1-1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0-1 -1-1 0-1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0-1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0-1 0 0 1 0 0 1-6 -