CSCE 2011 General Conference - Congrès générale 2011 de la SCGC. Ottawa, Ontario June 14-17, 2011 / 14 au 17 juin 2011

Similar documents
Engineering Characteristics of Ground Motion Records of the Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake of June 23, 2010

New data arrived in June!

Earthquakes in Canada

Strong Motion Records from Earthquakes in Eastern Canada

Earthquake Risk in Canada and the National Building Code

Non-damage Modal Parameter Variations on a 22 Story Reinforced Concrete Building

What Are Recorded In A Strong-Motion Record?

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

SURFACE WAVES AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Long-period Ground Motion Characteristics of the Osaka Sedimentary Basin during the 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake

INELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS

Digital Research Space of Induced Seismicity for EPOS Purposes (IS-EPOS project)

Effect of Dampers on Seismic Demand of Short Period Structures

RISKY HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS RESONATING WITH THE LONG-PERIOD STRONG GROUND MOTIONS IN THE OSAKA BASIN, JAPAN

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF MODAL PARAMETER VARIATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING

Overview of National Seismic Hazard Maps for the next National Building Code

APPENDIX J. Dynamic Response Analysis

Movement assessment of a cable-stayed bridge tower based on integrated GPS and accelerometer observations

Analysis Of Seismic Performance Of Fps Base Isolated Structures Subjected To Near Fault Events

AC : IMPROVING STUDENT UNDERSTANDING OF STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS USING FULL-SCALE, REAL-TIME EXCITATION OF BUILDINGS

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON A MEDIUM RISE BUILDING

The 2003, M W 7.2 Fiordland Earthquake, and its nearsource aftershock strong motion data

TRACE MANUAL. IMS Document Number: TRACE User Manual_v4

Extending the magnitude range of seismic reservoir monitoring by Utilizing Hybrid Surface Downhole Seismic Networks

September 28, 2004 Parkfield Earthquake

Fatigue-Ratcheting Study of Pressurized Piping System under Seismic Load

Earthquakes in Canada

SHAKING TABLE TEST OF STEEL FRAME STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTIONS

Measurement of wind-induced response of buildings using RTK-GPS and integrity monitoring

Dynamic Characteristics for Traditional Wooden Structure in Korea by Using Impact Hammer Test

STUDY ON MICROTREMOR CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON SIMULTANEOUS MEASUREMENTS BETWEEN BASEMENT AND SURFACE USING BOREHOLE

Preliminary Earthquake Report

TRI-AXIAL SHAKE TABLE TEST ON THE THINNED WALL PIPING MODEL AND DAMAGE DETECTION BEFORE FAILURE

Model tests and FE-modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction

Induced Seismic Monitoring: Insights from a Duvernay Case Study

Jocelyn Karen Campbell

Modal System Identification & Finite Element Model Updating of a 15-story Building using Earthquake & Ambient Vibration Data

PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE 2012 BUILDING CODE O. REG. 332/12 AS AMENDED

TexNet and CISR: An Update on Monitoring and Understanding Seismicity in Texas

INFLUENCE OF FRICTION PENDULUM SYSTEM ON THE RESPONSE OF BASE ISOLATED STRUCTURES

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Effects of multi-directional excitations on the response of a secondary structure with two attachments

NEAR FIELD EXPERIMENTAL SEISMIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH ALGERIAN REGULATORY DESIGN SPECTRUM

SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION & DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES USING OPTICAL TRACKER ARRAY DATA

Seismic Hazard Maps for the National Building Code of Canada

Insights from joint interpretation of dense array observations and 3D multicomponent seismic: The ToC2ME experiment, Fox Creek, AB

Some notes on processing: causal vs. acausal low-cut filters version 1.0. David M. Boore. Introduction

Modal Based Fatigue Monitoring of Steel Structures

Ground Motions with Static Displacement Derived from Strong-motion Accelerogram Records by a New Baseline Correction Method

System Identification and Model Updating of the Four Seasons Building

CHAPTER 5. 1:6-Scale Frame: Northridge Ground-Motion Modeling and Testing

Journey Through a Project: Shake-table Test of a Reinforced Masonry Structure

Improvements to Seismic Monitoring of the European Arctic Using Three-Component Array Processing at SPITS

Dynamic Stability and Design of Cantilever Bridge Columns

Investigation of traffic-induced floor vibrations in a building

A STUDY ON EARTHQUAKE RESPONSES OF ACTUAL ROCK-FILL DAM AND NUMERICAL ANALYSES

University of California

Automated Processing of. Very Short Epicentral Distances. José M. Cepeda Universidad Centroamericana, (UCA) San Salvador, El Salvador

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

INFLUENCE OF LOW-CUT FILTER FREQUENCY ON NONLINEAR OSCILLATOR DISPLACEMENTS COMPUTED FROM NON-DEGRADING TO DEGRADING HYSTERETIC MODELS

DETERMINATION OF BEDROCK STRUCTURE OF TOTTORI PLAIN USING SEISMIC EXPLOSION, MICROTREMOR AND GRAVITY SURVEY

CYPRUS STRONG MOTION DATABASE: RESPONSE SPECTRA FOR SHORT RETURN PERIOD EVENTS IN CYPRUS

Design of Frequency-Dependent Weighting Functions for H 2 Control of Seismic-Excited Structures

Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND

RELATIONSHIP OF SEISMIC RESPONSES AND STRENGTH INDEXES OF GROUND MOTIONS FOR NPP STRUCTURES

Numerical Modelling of Dynamic Earth Force Transmission to Underground Structures

Earthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network , preliminary results

SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL-FOUNDATION STRUCTURE SYSTEMS BY MEANS OF AMBIENT NOISE RECORDS: THE CASE OF EUROPROTEAS MODEL STRUCTURE IN EUROSEISTEST

PRELIMINARY STUDY OF GROUND MOTION CHARACTERISTICS IN FURUKAWA DISTRICT, JAPAN, BASED ON VERY DENSE SEISMIC-ARRAY-OBSERVATION

OVERVIEW INTRODUCTION 3 WHAT'S MISSING? 4 OBJECTIVES 5

Damage detection of truss bridge via vibration data using TPC technique

Seismic Displacement Demands for Performance-Based Design and Rehabilitation of Structures in North America

SITE EFFECTS AND ARMENIAN SEISMIC CODE

The quarter-wavelength average velocity: a review of some past and recent application developments

Comparative Study of Large and Medium Scale Mosque Models Tested on Seismic Shaking Table

1. Background. 2. Objectives of Project. Page 1 of 29

Multi Hazard Evaluation of a High Voltage Transmission Network. John Eidinger 1 and Leon Kempner 2

Seismic Hazard Switzerland. When, where, and how often does certain shaking occur in Switzerland?

Imaging Unknown Faults in Christchurch, New Zealand, after a M6.2 Earthquake

By D.H. Lang 1 and J. Schwarz 1. This paper is an extract from

Detecting and Quantifying Damage in Buildings Using Earthquake Response Data and Capacity Curves

ESTIMATION OF SEDIMENT THICKNESS BY USING MICROTREMOR OBSERVATIONS AT PALU CITY, INDONESIA. Pyi Soe Thein. 11 November 2013

INVESTIGATION OF SITE RESPONSE IN KATHMANDU VALLEY USING AFTERSHOCK DATA OF THE 2015 GORKHA EARTHQUAKE, NEPAL

Seismic Response of Sedimentary Basin Subjected to Obliquely Incident SH Waves

Seismogeodesy for rapid earthquake and tsunami characterization

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and shallow seismic surveys at Calgary International Airport, Alberta

Model Uncertainty and Analyst Qualification in Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis

ANALYSIS OF HIGHRISE BUILDING STRUCTURE WITH SETBACK SUBJECT TO EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

Notes on Comparing the Nano-Resolution Depth Sensor to the Co-located Ocean Bottom Seismometer at MARS

SHAKE TABLE STUDY OF SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION EFFECTS ON SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SINGLE AND ADJACENT BUILDINGS

Address for Correspondence

Effective stress analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soil

Seismic response of SDOF systems under doublet earthquakes. *Saman Yaghmaei-Sabegh 1)

SFSI in shallow foundation earthquake response

On May 4, 2001, central Arkansas experienced an M=4.4 earthquake followed by a

MULTI-DIMENSIONAL VS-PROFILING WITH MICROTREMOR H/V AND ARRAY TECHNIQUES

arxiv: v1 [physics.geo-ph] 31 Dec 2013

CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503

Ambient vibration of oscillating and vibrating rollers

Transcription:

CSCE 11 General Conference - Congrès générale 11 de la SCGC Ottawa, Ontario June 1-17, 11 / 1 au 17 juin 11 Dynamic Characteristics of Three Major Towers on Parliament Hill, Ottawa, from Recorded Vibrations during the Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake of June 3, 1 Lan Lin 1, John Adams 1, Jocelyn Paquette, Rock Glazer 3, and Don Duchesne 1 Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Public Works and Government Services Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada 3 National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Abstract: The magnitude (Mw) of. Val-des-Bois earthquake that occurred in Quebec on June 3, 1 was the biggest recent earthquake in eastern Canada. It produced the strongest shaking ever felt in Ottawa. The ground shaking was widely felt in Ontario and Quebec, and it was also felt in the US as far as Kentucky. A number of records from this event were compiled and processed by the Geological Survey of Canada. Of special importance for this paper are the recorded vibrations of three towers of the Parliament Hill buildings in Ottawa, i.e., the Peace Tower of the Centre Block, the Mackenzie Tower of the West Block, and the South-West Tower of the East Block. In total 7 records were obtained at the towers, including records at the ground level, at the middle and at the top of the towers. These are the first significant records obtained on the towers during an earthquake. The records were processed to determine the dynamic characteristics of the towers. Based on the spectra of the recorded signals, the natural frequencies of the vibration modes were determined. These were found to be very similar to those from ambient vibration tests. The results from this study are very important for seismic evaluations of the towers on Parliament Hill. 1. Introduction The response of a given structure to dynamic loading depends very much on the dynamic characteristics of the structure. These characteristics, which normally refer to the natural frequencies and shapes of the modes, depend on the geometry of the structure in plan and elevation, the structural system, and the property of the material of the structure. The dynamic characteristic of a structure can be determined theoretically using available computer programs for structural and dynamic analysis (e.g., CSI, Carr ). However, the computed values using such programs might be quite different from the actual values because of the uncertainties in the material properties and the approximations involved in the development of the computer model of the structure considered. The uncertainties of the computed natural frequencies and mode shapes might be especially large for heritage structures, as is the case for the towers of the Parliament Hill buildings in Ottawa. This is primarily because the towers are built of stone masonry, for which the material properties are not known, and assumptions have to be made regarding these properties. The most reliable approach for determining the natural frequencies of a structure is based on recorded vibrations of the structure, which can be either ambient vibrations or vibrations due to strong seismic motions. The natural frequencies of the structure can be determined by considering the GC-173-1

spectra of the recorded motions. Since the structural response is dominated by the contributions of the modal vibrations, the natural frequencies of the modes correspond to the predominant frequencies of the spectrum. This paper describes the determination of the natural frequencies of three towers of the Parliament Hill buildings in Ottawa, i.e., the Peace Tower of the Centre Block, the Mackenzie Tower of the West Block, and the South-West Tower of the East Block. Recorded vibrations of the towers obtained during the magnitude Mw. Val-des-Bois earthquake of June 3, 1 were used in the analyses. These are the first records from significant earthquake motions (magnitude of.) recorded on the towers. The computation of the natural frequencies of the towers is one significant step in the use of these records. The records can be used in further studies for the calibration of the dynamic models of the towers and the prediction of their responses when subjected to seismic motions.. Natural Frequencies of the Towers.1 The Peace Tower of the Centre Block.1.1 Instrumentation There are 1 instruments for recording acceleration time histories deployed in the Peace Tower of the Centre Block. The locations of the instruments are shown in Figure 1. It is seen from the figure that instruments are installed at four levels of the tower, i.e., ground level, level (at about /3 of the height of the tower), level B (at about 3/ of the height), and level E (top of the tower). There are three seismometers at ground level, two seismometers at level, four seismometers at level B, and three seismometers at level E. The orientation of the seismometers is such that vibrations at the instrumented locations can be recorded in North-South, East-West, and Vertical directions. For ease of understanding the records, the channel ID and the orientation of the recorded components corresponding to each of the seismometers are shown in Table 1. The abbreviations NS and EW indicate records in the North-South and East-West directions respectively. Level E triaxial #, #, # N West side, level B triaxial #1, #, #3 (SW corner) uniaxial #1 (NW corner) West side, level uniaxial #11 (NW corner) uniaxial #1 (SW corner) Ground Level triaxial #7, #, #9 Sensor locations Figure 1: Layout of accelerometers on the Peace Tower. GC-173-

Table 1: Peak accelerations of the records obtained at the Peace Tower. Channel ID Location Recorded component Peak acceleration (g) 1 Level B NS N/A Level B Vertical.11 3 Level B, SW corner EW.77 Level E NS. Level E Vertical.1 Level E EW.79 7 Ground NS.1 Ground Vertical.3 9 Ground EW.31 1 Level B, NW corner EW. 11 Level, NW corner EW.3 1 Level, SW corner EW..1. Acceleration Time Histories and Peak Motions With the exception of channel 1 which was not functional, all other 11 instruments were triggered during the Val-des-Bois earthquake. The digital records obtained by the seismometers are in units of volts, and conversion to units of acceleration was done by using the corresponding conversion factors that are given for each instrument. No further processing, such as filtering and baseline correction, was conducted on the records. The acceleration time histories of the NS, EW, and Vertical components of the records are shown in Figures, 3, and respectively. The time histories show that the tower has been exposed to quite strong vibrations for about seconds, i.e., between the 1 th and the 1 th second marks on the time axis. The peak accelerations of the recorded components are listed in Table 1. It can be seen in the table that the peak acceleration of the vibration at Level E (roof) in NS direction is. g while the peak acceleration of the vibrations at the ground level, in the same direction, is.1 g, i.e., the peak acceleration recorded on the roof of the tower is about 1 times larger than that recorded at the ground level... -. -. Level E, channel 1 1 3 3 7 7.. -. Ground, channel 7 1 1 3 3 7 7 Figure : Acceleration time histories of the NS components recorded on the Peace Tower. GC-173-3

... -. -. -. Level B, SW corner, channel 3 1 1 3 3 7 7..1 Level E, channel -.1 -. 1 1 3 3 7 7.3..1 Ground, channel 9 -.1 -. 1 1 3 3 7 7... -. -. -. -. Level B, NW corner, channel 1 1 1 3 3 7 7.3..1 -.1 -. -.3 1 1 3 3 Level, NW corner, channel 11 7 7.. Level, SW corner, channel 1 -. 1 1 3 3 7 7 Figure 3: Acceleration time histories of the EW components recorded on the Peace Tower..1. Level B, channel -. -.1 1 1 3 3 7 7.1.1 Level E, channel. -. -.1 -.1 1 1 3 3 7 7..3..1 -.1 -. Ground, channel 1 1 3 3 7 7 Figure : Acceleration time histories of the Vertical components recorded on the Peace Tower. GC-173-

.1.3 Natural Frequencies To determine the natural frequencies of the tower, Fourier analyses were performed on the horizontal components of the records. The spectra for the NS and EW components are presented in Figure. Since channel 1 was not functional (as mentioned above), only the Fourier spectrum of the record at the top of the tower (level E) is used here for the identification of the predominant frequencies of the vibrations in the NS direction. Figure shows that three frequencies dominate the response in the NS direction corresponding to the 1 st, nd, and 3 rd modes of vibration of 1.1 Hz, 3. Hz, and 7. Hz respectively (i.e., 1 st, nd, and 3 rd mode periods of.9 s,.3 s, and.1 s respectively). Regarding the EW direction, Figure shows two predominant frequencies, i.e., the 1 st mode frequency of 3. Hz and the nd mode frequency of. Hz (1 st mode period of.31 s, and nd mode period of.1 s).3.3 (a) NS component, level E NS component, ground.3.3 (b) EW component, level E EW component, level B (NW corner) EW component, level B (SW corner) EW component, level (NW corner).. EW componet, level (SW corner) EW component, ground...1.1.1.1...1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 Figure : spectra for the records obtained on the Peace Tower, (a) NS components, (b) EW components.. The Mackenzie Tower of the West Block..1 Instrumentation There are 3 instruments deployed on the Mackenzie Tower of the West Block. These are installed on the ground level, in the middle (i.e., level ) of the tower, and on the top floor of the tower. The locations of the instruments are shown in Figure. Each instrument records three components, i.e., NS component, EW component and Vertical component. All the sensors were triggered during the Val-des-Bois earthquake, and in total nine records of the vibrations of the tower were obtained during the earthquake. GC-173-

Figure : Layout of accelerometers on the Mackenzie Tower... Acceleration Time Histories and Peak Motions The acceleration time histories of the records obtained at the Mackenzie Tower are presented in Figures 7 to 9 while the peak accelerations of the motions are listed in Table. As shown in the table, the maximum acceleration of the vibrations on the top floor is around.1 g, and that on the ground level is about. g. Note that these values are from the vertical components. Another observation from Table is that the ratio of the peak acceleration obtained on the top of the tower to that obtained on the ground level is about. for all three components...3..1 -.1 -. NS 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3..1 -.1 -. -.3 EW 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3..3..1 -.1 -. Vertical 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 Figure 7: Acceleration time histories of the NS, EW and Vertical components recorded on the ground level of the Mackenzie Tower. GC-173-

... -. -. NS 1 1 3 3.3..1 -.1 -. -.3 -. EW 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3.1. Vertical -. 1 1 Figure : Acceleration waveforms for the NS, EW and Vertical components recorded on the level of the Mackenzie Tower. 3 3... -. -. NS 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3.... EW -. -. -. 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3.1. Vertical -. -.1 1 1 1 1 1 Figure 9: Acceleration time histories of the NS, EW and Vertical components recorded on the top floor of the Mackenzie Tower. 3 3 3 3 3..3 Natural Frequencies Table : Peak accelerations of the records obtained at the Mackenzie Tower. Instrument ID Location Peak acceleration (g) NS component Vertical component EW component SN993 Ground.9..3 SN99 Level.7.93.39 SN99 Top floor.9.9. Fourier analyses were also conducted on the records obtained at the Mackenzie Tower. The Fourier amplitude spectra for the NS and EW components are shown in Figure 1. It can be seen in the figure that the dominant frequencies of the NS and the EW components are 1.3 Hz and 1.7 Hz respectively, indicating that the first mode frequency in the NS direction is 1.3 Hz and that in the EW direction is 1.7 Hz. Expressed in terms of the periods, the first mode periods in the NS and EW directions of the tower are.1 s and.3 s respectively. It is useful to mention that the first mode periods in the NS and EW directions are very close to those based on the ambient vibration test on the tower (PWGSC, ). As reported in PWGSC (), the first mode periods in the NS and EW directions of the tower were found to be. s and.7 s respectively. GC-173-7

.1.1 (a) NS component,ground level NS component, level NS component, top floor.1.1 (b) EW component,ground level EW component, level EW component, top floor.1.1.........1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 Figure 1: spectra for the records obtained at the Mackenzie Tower, (a) NS components, (b) EW components..3 The South-West Tower of the East Block.3.1 Instrumentation Two instruments are deployed in the South-West Tower of the East Block. The instruments are installed at the ground level and on the top floor of the tower. The locations of the instruments are shown in Figure 11. Each instrument records three components, i.e., NS component, EW component, and Vertical component. All the sensors were triggered during the Val-des-Bois earthquake. Figure 11: Layout of accelerometers at the South-West Tower of the East Block. GC-173-

.3. Acceleration Time Histories and Peak Motions The acceleration time histories of the records obtained at the South-West Tower are presented in Figures 1 and 13, and the peak accelerations of the recorded components are listed in Table 3. As expected, it is seen from the table that the peak accelerations recorded on the roof of the tower are much larger than those recorded on the ground level, i.e., the maximum acceleration of the vibrations at the top floor is around.19 g, and that at the ground level is about. g... NS -. 1 1 3 3 7 7..1 -.1 -. EW 1 1 3 3 7 7.3..1 -.1 -. Vertical 1 1 3 3 7 7 Figure 1: Acceleration time histories of the NS, EW and Vertical components recorded on the ground level of the South-West Tower..... -. -. -. NS 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3.1.1. -. -.1 -.1 EW 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3.1. Vertical -. 1 1 1 1 1 Figure 13: Acceleration time histories of the NS, EW and Vertical components recorded on the top floor of the South-West Tower. Table 3: Peak accelerations of the records obtained at the South-West Tower. Peak acceleration (g) Instrument ID Location NS component Vertical component EW component SN3 Ground.9.7.9 SN Top floor.7.1.17 3 3 3 3 3.3.3 Natural Frequencies The spectra for the NS and the EW components of the records obtained at the South- West Tower are presented in Figure 1. It is seen that both the NS components and the EW components have the same dominant frequency of 1.7 Hz. This frequency represents the first mode frequency of the vibrations of the tower in the NS and EW directions. Consequently, the first mode periods in the NS and GC-173-9

the EW directions of the tower are.3 s. It is interesting to observe that this period is the same as the first mode period in the EW direction of the Mackenzie tower..1.1 (a) NS component,ground level NS component, top floor.1.1 (b) EW component,ground level EW component, top floor.1.1.1.1.........1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 Figure 1: spectra for the records obtained at the South-West Tower: (a) NS components, (b) EW components. 3. Summary and Conclusions This paper presents characteristics of the vibrations of three major towers, i.e., Peace Tower, Mackenzie Tower and South-West Tower (of the East Block), on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, recorded during the magnitude M w Val-des-Bois earthquake of June 3, 1. The main objective of the study was to determine the natural periods of the vibration modes of the towers based on the recorded motions. The spectra of the records were used to determine the natural periods in the North-South (NS) and East-West (EW) directions of the towers. The findings from this study can be summarized as follows: The natural periods of the 1 st, nd and the 3 rd vibration modes in the NS direction of the Peace Tower are.9 s,.3 s, and.1 s respectively, and those of the 1 st and the nd modes in the EW direction are.31 s and.1 s. The 1 st mode periods in the NS and EW directions of the Mackenzie Tower are.1 s and.3 s respectively. For the South-West Tower, the 1 st mode period is.3 s for both the NS and the EW directions. Based on the peak accelerations, the acceleration responses of the roofs of the Peace Tower, the Mackenzie Tower, and the South-West Tower are larger than the corresponding ground motion accelerations by factors of about 1,. and respectively. The natural periods and the records discussed in this paper can be used for the calibration of the analytical models of the towers and for the investigations of the performance of the towers under seismic motions.. References Carr, A.J.. RUAUMOKO Inelastic dynamic analysis program. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. CSI. SAP - Computer program for three dimensional static and dynamic finite element analysis and design of structures, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA. PWGSC,. Guidelines for the seismic assessment of stone-masonry structures. Public Works & Government Services Canada, Gatineau, Quebec. GC-173-1