Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

Similar documents
University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece

Guangzhou, P.R. China

Online publication date: 30 March 2011

Online publication date: 01 March 2010 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Gilles Bourgeois a, Richard A. Cunjak a, Daniel Caissie a & Nassir El-Jabi b a Science Brunch, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Box

Characterizations of Student's t-distribution via regressions of order statistics George P. Yanev a ; M. Ahsanullah b a

OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, TAEJON, KOREA

The Fourier transform of the unit step function B. L. Burrows a ; D. J. Colwell a a

Dissipation Function in Hyperbolic Thermoelasticity

University, Tempe, Arizona, USA b Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New. Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Geometrical optics and blackbody radiation Pablo BenÍTez ab ; Roland Winston a ;Juan C. Miñano b a

FB 4, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück

Full terms and conditions of use:

Testing Goodness-of-Fit for Exponential Distribution Based on Cumulative Residual Entropy

Communications in Algebra Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

Acyclic, Cyclic and Polycyclic P n

Full terms and conditions of use:

Precise Large Deviations for Sums of Negatively Dependent Random Variables with Common Long-Tailed Distributions

Published online: 05 Oct 2006.

Use and Abuse of Regression

Online publication date: 22 March 2010

The American Statistician Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

Diatom Research Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

Park, Pennsylvania, USA. Full terms and conditions of use:

Open problems. Christian Berg a a Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of. Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Published online: 07 Nov 2014.

Ankara, Turkey Published online: 20 Sep 2013.

G. S. Denisov a, G. V. Gusakova b & A. L. Smolyansky b a Institute of Physics, Leningrad State University, Leningrad, B-

Version of record first published: 01 Sep 2006.

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

George L. Fischer a, Thomas R. Moore b c & Robert W. Boyd b a Department of Physics and The Institute of Optics,

Nacional de La Pampa, Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina b Instituto de Matemática Aplicada San Luis, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas

The Homogeneous Markov System (HMS) as an Elastic Medium. The Three-Dimensional Case

To cite this article: Edward E. Roskam & Jules Ellis (1992) Reaction to Other Commentaries, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27:2,

Astrophysical Observatory, Smithsonian Institution, PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Derivation of SPDEs for Correlated Random Walk Transport Models in One and Two Dimensions

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Chapter 7: From theory to observations

Tore Henriksen a & Geir Ulfstein b a Faculty of Law, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway. Available online: 18 Feb 2011

Online publication date: 12 January 2010

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Discussion on Change-Points: From Sequential Detection to Biology and Back by David Siegmund

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Dresden, Dresden, Germany Published online: 09 Jan 2009.

CCSM: Cross correlogram spectral matching F. Van Der Meer & W. Bakker Published online: 25 Nov 2010.

Xiaojun Yang a a Department of Geography, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL32306, USA Available online: 22 Feb 2007

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Lab Exercises for Low Mass Stars

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Published online: 17 May 2012.

Communications in Algebra Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

Lab Exercises for Low Mass Stars

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

MSci Astrophysics 210PHY412

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Fractal Dimension of Turbulent Premixed Flames Alan R. Kerstein a a

Lecture 26 The Hertzsprung- Russell Diagram January 13b, 2014

University, Wuhan, China c College of Physical Science and Technology, Central China Normal. University, Wuhan, China Published online: 25 Apr 2014.

Raman Research Institute, Bangalore, India

The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

Masses are much harder than distance, luminosity, or temperature. Binary Stars to the Rescue!! AST 101 Introduction to Astronomy: Stars & Galaxies

Fokker-Planck Solution for a Neuronal Spiking Model Derek J. Daniel a a

Osnabrück, Germany. Nanotechnology, Münster, Germany

Astr 323: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology. Spring Quarter 2012, University of Washington, Željko Ivezić. Lecture 1:

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. The Hertzprung-Russell Diagram. Question

A note on adaptation in garch models Gloria González-Rivera a a

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Analysis of Leakage Current Mechanisms in BiFeO 3. Thin Films P. Pipinys a ; A. Rimeika a ; V. Lapeika a a

Hertzprung-Russel and colormagnitude. ASTR320 Wednesday January 31, 2018

EVOLUTION OF STARS HERTZSPRUNG-RUSSELL DIAGRAM

Global Existence of Large BV Solutions in a Model of Granular Flow

ASTR-1020: Astronomy II Course Lecture Notes Section III

Sports Technology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:

ASTRONOMY QUIZ NUMBER 11

Móstoles, Madrid. Spain. Universidad de Málaga. Málaga. Spain

35-959, Rzeszów, Poland b Institute of Computer Science, Jagiellonian University,

From theory to observations

A Strongly Convergent Method for Nonsmooth Convex Minimization in Hilbert Spaces

Projective spaces in flag varieties

From theory to observations

First published on: 10 December 2009 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Anisotropic Hall effect in Al 13 TM 4

Photometric Observations of the δ Scuti Star UV Trianguli and its Evolutionary Status

Color-Magnitude Diagram Lab Manual

András István Fazekas a b & Éva V. Nagy c a Hungarian Power Companies Ltd., Budapest, Hungary. Available online: 29 Jun 2011

Quan Wang a, Yuanxin Xi a, Zhiliang Wan a, Yanqing Lu a, Yongyuan Zhu a, Yanfeng Chen a & Naiben Ming a a National Laboratory of Solid State

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Universe. Tenth Edition. The Nature of the Stars. Parallax. CHAPTER 17 The Nature of Stars

Nuclear Astrophysics. Lecture 10 Thurs. Jan. 12, 2012 Prof. Shawn Bishop, Office 2013, Ex

Online publication date: 29 April 2011

The Distance Modulus. Absolute Magnitude. Chapter 9. Family of the Stars

Stellar Structure and Evolution

Stellar Spectra ASTR 2110 Sarazin. Solar Spectrum

Tong University, Shanghai , China Published online: 27 May 2014.

The structure and evolution of stars

INSIDE LAB 8: Plotting Stars on the Hertzsprung- Russell Diagram

Transcription:

This article was downloaded by:[bochkarev, N.] On: 7 December 27 Access Details: [subscription number 746126554] Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 172954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Astronomical & Astrophysical Transactions The Journal of the Eurasian Astronomical Society Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t71345355 Synthetic Hertzsprung - Russell diagrams of low-mass stars and the efficiency of colour transformation in determining the open cluster ages İnc Akkaya a ; İbrahm Küçük a a Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey Online Publication Date: 1 December 25 To cite this Article: Akkaya, İnc and Küçük, İbrahm (25) 'Synthetic Hertzsprung - Russell diagrams of low-mass stars and the efficiency of colour transformation in determining the open cluster ages', Astronomical & Astrophysical Transactions, 24:6, 497-56 To link to this article: DOI: 1.18/155679663883 URL: http://dx.doi.org/1.18/155679663883 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions Vol. 24, No. 6, December 25, 497 56 Synthetic Hertzsprung Russell diagrams of low-mass stars and the efficiency of colour transformation in determining the open cluster ages İNCİ AKKAYA* and İBRAHİM KÜÇÜK Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Astronomy and Space Sciences, Erciyes University, Kayseri 3839, Turkey (Received 31 January 25; in final form 3 November 25) The scales of the effective temperature T eff and bolometric correction (BC) are necessary for isochrones to be compared with observed colour magnitude diagrams (CMDs) of star clusters. Reliable scales can be found, providing improved numerical relations between observed and theoretical quantities. A detailed analysis is presented of the effects which the log T eff, B V and BC scales have on the transformation of evolutionary tracks and time isochrones from the theoretical Hertzsprung Russell diagram to the CMD. We present a comparison between different scales of published transformations to find the ages of some selected open clusters. Keywords: Low-mass stars; Hertzsprung Russell diagram; Colour magnitude diagrams; Colour transformation; Open cluster ages 1. Introduction The last step in comparing theoretical isochrones with a star cluster colour magnitude diagram (CMD) is the transformation of luminosity and effective temperature T eff into brightness and colour. While there are a number of both theoretical and empirical sets of transformations available, this last step is, nonetheless, difficult and critical. In this paper, we demonstrate that existing empirical and theoretical transformations provide very different M V (B V)relationships when stellar evolutionary models of low-mass stars are taken into account. Details of the low-mass stellar models can be found in [1]. For the choice as to which transformation we apply to our isochrones, the following requirements need to be fulfilled. (i) The transformation which is better to explain the CMD of our theoretical models should be chosen. (ii) The isochrone should fit a cluster well in the M V (B V)plane for all transformations. *Corresponding author. Email: iakkaya@erciyes.edu.tr Astronomical and Astrophysical Transactions ISSN 155-6796 print/issn 1476-354 online 25 Taylor & Francis http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals DOI: 1.18/155679663883

498 I. Akkaya and I. Küçük In section 2 we present a number of recently published transformations and show the differences between the log T eff, B V and bolometric correction (BC) scales. We show that considerable differences in the resulting colours exist. Section 3 presents comparisons of the transformation scales with our stellar evolutionary models [1]. In section 4, we then present tests to verify its usefulness for the case of our own isochrones applied to open clusters suitable for our pre-main-sequence (PMS) evolutionary models. 2. A comparison of different published colour transformations 2.1 Transformation sources For the purpose of this investigation we have used a number of recently published transformations, which we briefly describe in the following. 2.1.1 The Flower 1977 (F77) [2] model. The T eff,b V and BC scales are presented for supergiants and giants as well as for main sequence stars hotter than the Sun. T eff (B V) relations are found for each of the luminosity classes V, III and I. In [2], the new temperatures, colours and BC values have been included for stars hotter than the Sun, and for M-type supergiants and giants. Also the temperature colour relation has been given for G and K supergiants. 2.1.2 The Flower 1996 (F96) [3] model. This paper collected temperature and BC measurements for 335 stars for the purpose of establishing refined numerical relations between T eff and BC and between T eff and B V. The stars span luminosity classes from main sequence stars (V) to supergiants (I) and temperatures from 29 to 52 5 K. Temperature and BC measurements from the basis of the new T eff,b V and BC scales have been derived in this work. 2.1.3 The Kenyon Hartmann 1995 (K95) [4] model. Kenyon and Hartmann tabulated the absolute magnitudes M J,M K and M bol for tracks using T eff values, BC values and broadband colours (see table A5 of [4]). 2.1.4 The Siess et al. 1997 (S97) [5] model. Siess et al. gave synthetic diagrams which have been modified as functions of various factors. They adopted the T eff scale and BC compilation of [6] for spectral types earlier than K5, and those of [7] for spectral types K7 and later. 2.2 Comparison of transformations 2.2.1 The log T eff and B V scales. From figures 1 3 the results of various colour transformations (indicated in figures) are displayed. In figure 1 we have plotted log T eff and B V values from [2] as a medium-dashed curve. The solid curve is from [3]. The long-dashed curve is the log T eff (B V)relation of [4]. The data from [5] are shown as a short-dashed curve. The results provide a fit around the magnitudes.4 B V.8. From the figure, it can be seen that deviations between different transformations for late spectral types are

Synthetic HRDs of low-mass stars 499 Figure 1. A comparison between the (B V) log T eff scales for F77, F96, K95 and S97. evident. For early spectral types the computations match each other. The linear fits for this graph are F77: log T eff = 3.9155.2343(B V), (1) F96: log T eff = 3.9.295(B V), (2) K95: log T eff = 3.9171.2394(B V), (3) S97: log T eff = 3.9181.247(B V). (4) Figure 2. The relation between BC and T eff for all transformations. The different symbols for the lines are the same as in figure 1 (see text).

5 I. Akkaya and I. Küçük Figure 3. A comparison between the (B V) BC scales for F77, F96, K95 and S97. 2.2.2 The log T eff and BC scales. The comparison is displayed in figure 2. The linear fits for this graph are F77: BC = 6.9215 log T eff 26.942, (5) F96: BC = 9.493 log T eff 34.295, (6) K95: BC = 6.927 log T eff 26.3326, (7) S97: BC = 6.4691 log T eff 24.517. (8) 2.2.3 The B V and BC scales. The difference between transformations is evident in figure 3. For cooler temperatures the scale in [3] is hotter than the scale in [2], and it agrees at around 5 K with the others but deviates after that temperature. For a given value of BC =.5 the differences are (S97, F77).2 and (F96, K95).6. The linear fits for this graph are F77: BC = 1.3643(B V)+ 1.869, (9) F96: BC = 1.763(B V)+ 1.4286, (1) K95: BC = 1.5662(B V)+ 1.137, (11) S97: BC = 1.8468(B V)+ 1.5248. (12) 3. Comparison of transformation scales with our theoretical models Evolution of the gravitational contraction phase of stars having masses.3m Sun M/M Sun 1.5M Sun were studied together with deuterium burning [1]. The equation of state developed in [8] and OPAL opacity tables were used. Convection was treated by the mixing-length theory. The ratio of the mixing length to the pressure scale height was assumed to be 1.74. For the chemical composition we took the fractional hydrogen abundance X =.699 and the

Synthetic HRDs of low-mass stars 51 heavy-element abundance Z =.19, by mass. Details of the models can be found in [1]. These evolutionary models are used to generate a synthetic Hertzsprung Russell diagram (SHRD) of low-mass stars. The method is as follows. The difference between the bolometric and absolute visual magnitudes is the BC, given by with BC = M bol M V, (13) ( ) LV =+2.5 log + constant, L (14) L V = 4πR π cf(λ)s V dλ 4πR π F (λ) dλ, (15) where R is the radius of the star, F (λ) is the monochromatic flux, S V (λ) is the response function of the V band, and c is a constant. After combining these relations, we obtain ( ) ( BC = 2.5 log F (λ) dλ + 2.5 log ( ) BOL = 2.5 log F (λ) dλ ) F (λ)s V (λ) dλ + constant, (16) ( σt 4 = 2.5 log eff π ), (17) BC = BOL V + constant. (18) where V = 2.5 F (λ)s V (λ) dλ For the solar composition the theoretical evolutionary tracks of stars of low masses [1] are obtained and displayed in figure 4. This diagram is transformed to the SHRD in the M V (B V)plane by using all the transformation scales that we considered. Figure 4. Theoretical evolutionary tracks of low-mass stars of masses (.3 1.5)M Sun.

52 I. Akkaya and I. Küçük Figure 5. Zero-age main sequence of our models calculated from different transformation scales. In order to emphasize the key influence of transformations, we compare in figure 5 the location in the M V (B V)diagram with the zero-age main sequence of our models derived from transformation scales. The differences due to the conversion relations are obvious and the difference in M V has a magnitude of about.7 between [3] and [5], which causes our models to become redder if we take into account the scales in [3]. Figure 6 shows the SHRD of our low-mass model tracks if we take into account the transformation scale in [3]. Figure 6. SHRD obtained by F96 transformations. Figure 7. SHRD obtained by K95 transformations.

Synthetic HRDs of low-mass stars 53 Figure 8. SHRD comparison for.3m Sun obtained from all transformations. Figure 9. SHRD comparison for 1.5M Sun obtained from all transformations. The SHRD of our low-mass model tracks is also displayed in figure 7 for the transformations in [4]. Figure 8 displays the differences in the evolutionary track of a.3m Sun star. From this figure, one can conclude that the results in [5] are hotter than the others. We display the same comparison in figure 9 for the 1.5M Sun track. The difference is achieved more at the cool end of the track while there exists a fit towards the main sequence. 4. Isochrones We present comparisons between the published transformations needed to generate the SHRD of the early PMS phases of low-mass stars with Z =.21 [1]. We compare our models in

54 I. Akkaya and I. Küçük Figure 1. Comparison of the isochrones for 1 3 years for all transformations. the M V (B V) plane and we show important deviations in the PMS tracks for stellar masses towards.3m Sun. The disagreement for all scales is obvious down to lower masses. For transforming our isochrones to the M V (B V) plane we have tested all the transformations mentioned above. The presented SHRD obtained with Z =.21 is suitable for the clusters chosen for determining their ages. The estimated ages of the selected clusters NGC 6318 and Trapezium are shown to be shifted somewhere between the isochrones for 1 3 and 1 4 years and between those for 1 6 and 1 7 years respectively. Figures 1 and 11 display the isochrone comparisons for 1 3 and 1 7 years respectively. Figure 1 displays major differences for the 1 3 years line between transformations. The result in [5] is hotter than others and gives longer ages. In figure 12 we display the fit for the isochrones for 1 3 and 1 4 years and the position of the open cluster NGC 6318. If we take into account the transformations in [3], NGC 6318 is older than 1 3 years but, if we consider [5], 8% of the stars of this cluster are older than 1 3 years. Another comparison Figure 11. Comparison of the isochrones for 1 7 years for all transformations.

Synthetic HRDs of low-mass stars 55 Figure 12. Fit of the isochrones for 1 3 and 1 4 years to the NGC 6318 cluster transformations. is shown in figure 13 with the isochrones for 1 4 and 1 5 years. According to [3], for NGC 6318, 7% of the stars are found to have ages less than 1 5 years while for [5] all stars have ages around 1 5 years. In this figure the Trapezium open cluster is displayed, too. A similar effect on age can be seen in figure 14 which is obtained for 1 6 and 1 7 years for the Trapezium cluster. Half of its stars can be considered to have ages less than 1 7 years when the isochrone in [3] is taken into account. According to the isochrone in [5] this cluster has an age of 1 7 years. It is evident from these illustrations that colour differences up to.2 magnitude exist for some typical transformations and there are no two transformations giving the same result for the lower end of our evolutionary stages. Figure 13. Fit of the isochrones for 1 4 and 1 5 years to the NGC 6318 and Trapezium clusters.

56 I. Akkaya and I. Küçük Figure 14. 5. Results and conclusions Fit of the isochrones for 1 6 and 1 7 years to the Trapezium cluster. We present comparisons between published transformations needed to generate the SHRD of the early PMS phases of low-mass stars with Z =.21.The main attention has been paid to the transformation scales from our theoretical Hertzsprung Russell diagram to the observational CMD. By adopting the scales in [2 5] we compared our models in the M V (B V)plane and we showed important deviations in the PMS tracks for stellar masses towards.3m Sun. Because SHRDs are useful tools to study the ages of young open clusters, we analysed the ages of some selected open clusters (NGC 6318 and Trapezium) by taking into account each of the transformation scales and found different ages for different scales. The colour differences up to.2 magnitude cause shifts in the isochrones and they give up to 5% difference in the cluster ages considered. We can say that the problem of determining a good empirical scale for BC against T eff is of primary importance for matching the stellar evolutionary tracks to the observations. The number of sample stars for the analysis of the BC log T eff relationship must be increased. Besides this, observational errors directly affect the computed value of the integrated flux in the observed regions, since they introduce uncertainties in the parameters derived from the fit and thus in the choice of the model needed to complete the spectral distribution. References [1] İ. Küçük, N. Kızıloglu and R. Civelek, Astrophys. Space Sci. 259 279 (1998). [2] P.J. Flower, Astron. Astrophys. 54 31 (1977). [3] P.J. Flower, Astrophys. J. 469 355 (1996). [4] S.J. Kenyon and L. Hartmann, Astrophys. J., Suppl. Ser. 11 117 (1995). [5] L. Siess, M. Forestini and C. Dougados, Astron. Astrophys. 324 556 (1997). [6] T.S. Schmidt-Kaler, in Landolt Börnstein, New Series, Group 6, Vol. 2b, Astronomy and Astrophysics Stars and Star Clusters, edited by K. Schaifers and H.H. Voigt (Springer, New York, 1982). [7] M.S. Bessell, Astron. J. 11 662 (1991). [8] D. Mihalas, D.G. Hummer and B.W. Mihalas, Astrophys. J. 35 3 (199).