Semi-Targeted Screening of Pharmaceutically- Related Contaminants in the Thames Tideway using LC-HRMS Kelly Munro, 1 Anthony Edge, 2 Claudia Martins, 3 David Cowan 4 and Leon Barron 1 1 Analytical & Environmental Sciences Division, King s College London, London, UK; 2 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tudor Road, Runcorn, UK; 3 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Villebon, France; 4 Drug Control Centre, King s College London, London, UK
Overview The occurrence of pharmaceutically-related contaminants within the environment continues to be a research area which generates great interest. The full environmental effects of chronic exposure of such pollutants have yet to be fully understood. As such more knowledge is sought on the presence of these contaminants within the environment. Traditionally, a targeted multi-residue analytical approach is applied to the analysis of environmental waters. A consequence of this can be a somewhat limited estimation of the true breadth of occurrence of pharmaceutically-related drug residues within such waters. Recent advances have seen non-targeted methods proposed as valid alternatives to the traditional approach. A ʻsemi-targetedʼ analytical approach is presented herein for the detection of a range of over-the-counter, prescribed and illicit drugs in environmental waters using mixed mode solid phase extraction (SPE) and liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). The potential to perform retrospective non-target analysis is also presented. Experimental A broad analytical screening method, shown in Figure 1, was developed using a selection of structurally diverse species which represented a variety of compounds classes, functional groups, pk a and log P values as well as reported environmental occurrences. 2 Semi-Targeted Screening of Pharmaceutically-Related Contaminants in the Thames Tideway using LC-HRMS
FIGURE 1 Schematic showing developed semi-targeted analytical approach. Sample Collection ml ph 2 adjustment Filtration, GF/ F.7μm Condition: 4 ml M eoh, 4 ml MilliQ W at er W ash: 4mL 5% MeOH in MilliQWater Elution: 4mL MeOH SPE Retain PEP HyperSep, 2 mg Evaporated to dryness at 35 C under nitrogen Recon μl Mobile Phase A L C-HRM S LC-HRMS was performed using a Thermo Scientific QExactive TM (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany), and the chromatographic and MS conditions are detailed in Table 1. TABLE 1. LC-HRMS conditions. LC HRMS Column Thermo Scientific Accucore TM 2.6 C18 (1 x 2.1 mm) Mobile Phase A: 9:1 Water + 1mM Ammonium Acetate : Acetonitrile B: 2:8 Water + 1 mm Ammonium Acetate:Acetonitrile Injection 2 μl volume Flow Rate 4 μl/min Capillary Temp 3 ( C) Heater Temp 3 ( C) Spray Voltage +ve. 4.5 kv -ve. 3 kv Capillary +ve. 52.5 V -ve. 52.5 V Voltage Tube Lens +ve. 135 V -ve. 135 V Voltage Resolution, FWHM Scan Range m/z: - AGC Target 1,, Max. Inject ms Time Fragmentation HCD (2eV) Mode Thermo Scientific Poster Note PN2814_e 6/13S 3
Results & Discussion 1. SPE Method Development The recoveries of compounds were evaluated for two different mixed-mode SPE sorbents across a range of ph (2-9). Figure 2 shows that optimized absolute recoveries for the majority of compounds were obtained using the Retain PEPfunctionalised polystyrene-divinylbenzene sorbent with a ml sample when adjusted to ph 2. FIGURE 2. Absolute recoveries obtained using a mixed mode PS-DVB sorbent (PEP) and a mixed mode cation exchange sorbent (CX) with a sample adjusted to ph 2. 1 ml PEP 1L PEP ml CX 1L CX % A bsolute Recovery Salicylic Acid Caffeine SM X SM Z Clofibric Acid T rimethoprim Ketoprofen Bezafibrate W arfarin Cocaine Diclofenac Ibuprofen Compound Carbamazepine Propranolol K etamine T emazepam N ortriptyline Diazepam Amitriptyline 2. ʻSemi-Targetedʼ Screening of Real Samples The developed analytical method was applied to the analysis of both Thames river water and influent wastewater. The presence of an analyte was confirmed by comparison with a reference standard. For example, cocaine is shown in Figure 3. 4 Semi-Targeted Screening of Pharmaceutically-Related Contaminants in the Thames Tideway using LC-HRMS
FIGURE 3. Cocaine confirmation. t R : retention time; AA: Peak Area; AH: Peak Height; BP: Base Peak accurate mass. % Relative Abundance t R : 8.96 AA: 1772 AH: 1643716 BP: 34.1536 t R : 8.95 AA: 1123685 AH: 977636 BP: 182.1172 t R : 9.9 AA: 3439759 AH: 33415 BP: 34.1542 34.1543 µg/ L MilliQ W ater Standard M ass Extraction W indow : 3ppm 182.1171 Fragment in Standard m/ z 34 River W ater Sample t R : 9.8 AA: 23332 AH: 198966 BP: 182.1174 m/ z 182 Fragment Confirmation in River W ater 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Time (min) Week-long qualitative studies of both river water and influent showed that the majority of the targeted compounds were present, shown in Figures 4 and 5 respectively. A quantitative analysis is now in preparation. FIGURE 4. Weekly variation of identified compounds in Thames river water. 1E+7 Peak Intensity 1E+6 1E+5 1E+4 Amitriptyline Bezafibrate Caffeine Carbamazepine Cocaine Diazepam N ortriptyline Propranolol T emazepam T rimethoprim W arfarin 1E+3 W ed T hurs Fri Sat Sun M on T ues Thermo Scientific Poster Note PN2814_e 6/13S 5
Levels of the majority of compounds remain consistent across the week, with the biggest fluctuations being observed in river water, in particular for cocaine and diazepam. It can also been seen that levels were approximately ten fold higher in influent for several compounds. FIGURE 5. Weekly variation of identified compounds in influent wastewater. 1E+8 Peak Intensity 1E+7 1E+6 1E+5 Amitriptyline Bezafibrate Caffeine Carbamazepine Cocaine Diazepam N ortriptyline K etamine Propranolol T emazepam T rimethoprim 1E+4 W ed T hurs Fri Sat Sun M on T ues 3. Mephedrone in the Environment Using the above approach, it was also possible to identify the illicit drug, mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone) in both river and wastewater. FIGURE 6. Chromatograms indicating the presence of the illicit drug mephedrone within river water and influent wastewater. t R : 6.75 AA: 11184 AH: 343172 BP: 178.1223 178.1226 µg/ L MilliQ W ater Standard Mass Extraction W indow : 3ppm % Relative Abundance t R : 6.8 AA: 1743875 AH: 121215 BP: 178.1223 t R : 8.62 AA: 31591 AH: 582 t BP: 178.1224 R : 6.77 AA: 247214 AH: 1447 BP: 178.1225 t R : 8.1 AA: 1845674 AH: 155293 BP: 178.1226 t R : 6.99 AA: 1166635 AH: 1898 BP: 178.1226 t R : 8.6 AA: 45113 AH: 6615 BP: 178.1224 m/ z 178 River W ater Spike m/ z 178 River W ater Blank m/ z 178 Influent Blank Confirmed with m/ z 16 and 145 fragments 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 Time (min) 6 Semi-Targeted Screening of Pharmaceutically-Related Contaminants in the Thames Tideway using LC-HRMS
Figure 6 shows the presence of mephedrone in river water, along with an unknown peak at 8.6 min which has the same accurate mass as mephedrone. Comparing a spiked sample with a blank sample it is clear that the intensity of the mephedrone peak increases accordingly whereas the unknown peak stays constant, confirming the presence of mephedrone within the river water. Mephedrone was also detected in influent water, with confirmatory fragment ions (m/z 16.1117 and 145.883). Again, an unknown peak was present at a similar retention time to that observed in river water. Therefore, this shows that even with HRMS, that the optimization of separation conditions is still very important. Ongoing efforts aim to apply this method in a quantitative analysis of both sample types once a complete analyte list is determined based on actual occurrence data. Conclusion A developed ʻsemi-targetedʼ analytical method was used to confirm the presence of several medicinal and illicit species in both river water and influent wastewater. The potential of nontarget retrospective analysis was also highlighted with the detection of the illegal drug mephedrone within environmental waters. www.thermofisher.com/dionex 216 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and its subsidiaries. This information is presented as an example of the capabilities of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. products. It is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Specifications, terms and pricing are subject to change. Not all products are available in all countries. Please consult your local sales representative for details. Australia +61 3 9757 4486 Austria +43 1 333 34 Belgium +32 53 73 42 41 Brazil +55 11 3731 514 China +852 2428 3282 Denmark +45 7 23 62 6 France +33 1 6 92 48 Germany +49 6126 991 India +91 22 6742 9494 Italy +39 2 51 62 1267 Japan +81 6 6885 1213 Korea +82 2 342 86 Netherlands +31 76 579 55 55 Singapore +65 6289 119 Sweden +46 8 473 338 Switzerland +41 62 25 9966 Taiwan +886 2 8751 6655 UK/Ireland +44 1442 233555 USA and Canada +847 295 7 PN2814_E 7/16S