San Jacinto Fault Zone and Sage Brush Flat High Frequency Experiments

Similar documents
of the San Jacinto Fault Zone and detailed event catalog from spatially-dense array data

Geophysical Journal International

Rupture Dynamics of Large Earthquakes inferred from Hydroacoustic Data

Data Repository: Seismic and Geodetic Evidence For Extensive, Long-Lived Fault Damage Zones

Ground Motion Prediction Equations in the San Jacinto Fault Zone. Significant Effects of Rupture Directivity and Fault Zone Amplification

Part 2 - Engineering Characterization of Earthquakes and Seismic Hazard. Earthquake Environment

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

6.6 Utilizing Lightning Locations to Optimize and Quality-Control Seismic Data

Magnitude 8.2 NORTHWEST OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Fault Processes on the Anza section of the San Jacinto Fault

Low-velocity damaged structure of the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield from fault zone trapped waves

overlie the seismogenic zone offshore Costa Rica, making the margin particularly well suited for combined land and ocean geophysical studies (Figure

Geophysical Journal International

An Improved Algorithm for Real-Time S-Wave Picking with Application to the (Augmented) ANZA Network in Southern California

Topography on Earthquake Motions in Sedimentary Basins

JOINT ACCURATE TIME-FREQUENCY AND HIGH-RESOLUTION ARRAY ANALYSIS, A TOOL FOR SITE EFFECTS ESTIMATION?

Seismogeodesy for rapid earthquake and tsunami characterization

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

3D VISCO-ELASTIC WAVE PROPAGATION IN THE BORREGO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Determining the Earthquake Epicenter: Japan

Observations of Atmospheric Phenomena from USArray and ANZA Observing Systems

Determining SAFOD area microearthquake locations solely with the Pilot Hole seismic array data

A systematic measurement of shear wave anisotropy in southern California Report for SCEC Award #15081 Submitted March 15, 2016

Earthquakes and Seismotectonics Chapter 5

Final Report for DOEI Project: Bottom Interaction in Long Range Acoustic Propagation

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies ADVANCED WAVEFORM SIMULATION FOR SEISMIC MONITORING EVENTS

APPLICATION OF A PASSIVE TOMOGRAPHY METHOD AND CORRELATION WITH ACTIVE SEISMIC OBSERVATIONS IN THE KYPARISSIAKOS GULF, SOUTHWESTERN HELLENIC ARC

Plate Boundary Observatory Working Group for the Central and Northern San Andreas Fault System PBO-WG-CNSA

External Grant Award Number 04HQGR0058 IMPROVED THREE-DIMENSIONAL VELOCITY MODELS AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS FOR CALIFORNIA

Ocean Bottom Seismometer Augmentation of the NPAL Philippine Sea Experiment

Tomographic imaging of P wave velocity structure beneath the region around Beijing

Local-scale cross-correlation of seismic noise from the Calico fault experiment

A BROADBAND SEISMIC EXPERIMENT IN YUNNAN, SOUTHWEST CHINA. Sponsored by Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Contract No.

THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE DIFFERENCE SIMULATION OF LONG-PERIOD GROUND MOTION IN THE KANTO PLAIN, JAPAN

Earthquake patterns in the Flinders Ranges - Temporary network , preliminary results

BROADBAND STRONG MOTION SIMULATION OF THE 2004 NIIGATA- KEN CHUETSU EARTHQUAKE: SOURCE AND SITE EFFECTS

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Online material: Updated 3-D tomography model and plotting script with examples

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Analysis of the 29th May 2008 Ölfus earthquake and aftershock sequence using three-component t processing on ICEARRAY

Piñon Flat Observatory Field Trip, November 2015

S e i s m i c W a v e s

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

Internal Layers of the Earth

Lab 6: Earthquake Focal Mechanisms (35 points)

Peter Shearer 1, Robin Matoza 1, Cecily Wolfe 2, Guoqing Lin 3, & Paul Okubo 4

CHAPTER 1 BASIC SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE TERMINOLGY. Earth Formation Plate Tectonics Sources of Earthquakes...

Supporting Online Material for

Chapter 3 Minimum 1-D Velocity Model: Using joint determination of hypocenters and velocity 3.1 Introduction

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Borehole Array observation system operated by Tono Research Institute of Earthquake Science and Some Interesting Result

FULL MOMENT TENSOR ANALYSIS USING FIRST MOTION DATA AT THE GEYSERS GEOTHERMAL FIELD

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies MODELING P WAVE MULTIPATHING IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

Velocity-Interface Structure of the Southwestern Ryukyu Subduction Zone from EW OBS/MCS Data

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 24

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

JCR (2 ), JGR- (1 ) (4 ) 11, EPSL GRL BSSA

28th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

FloatSeis Technologies for Ultra-Deep Imaging Seismic Surveys

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Structural Cause of Missed Eruption in the Lunayyir Basaltic

Long-period ground motion characterization by cross wavelet transform

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

SONGS Seismic Research Projects

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

Geo736: Seismicity and California s Active Faults Introduction

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

2008 Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Seismic Recording Station AZ_PFO Summary Report

Borehole Seismic Monitoring of Injected CO 2 at the Frio Site

crustal volume of the swarm. This initiated interest and concern that another

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Seismic Observation and Seismicity of Uganda

Long-period Ground Motion Characteristics of the Osaka Sedimentary Basin during the 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake

Arthur Frankel, William Stephenson, David Carver, Jack Odum, Robert Williams, and Susan Rhea U.S. Geological Survey

Some aspects of seismic tomography

Magnitude 6.9 GULF OF CALIFORNIA

Notes on Comparing the Nano-Resolution Depth Sensor to the Co-located Ocean Bottom Seismometer at MARS

Synthetic Seismogram A Tool to Calibrate PP & PS Seismic Data

The Coso Geothermal Area: A Laboratory for Advanced MEQ Studies for Geothermal Monitoring

Fault Specific, Dynamic Rupture Scenarios for Strong Ground Motion Prediction

P Wave Reflection and Refraction and SH Wave Refraction Data Processing in the Mooring, TN Area

Southern California ground motion envelopes over ranges of magnitudes, distances, and site conditions

Walkaway Seismic Experiments: Stewart Gulch, Boise, Idaho

Blue and Fin Whale Habitat Modeling from Long-Term Year-Round Passive Acoustic Data from the Southern California Bight

Applications of finite-difference modelling to coalscale seismic exploration

arxiv: v1 [physics.geo-ph] 31 Dec 2013

THE USE OF INPUT ENERGY FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT WITH DIFFERENT DUCTILITY LEVEL

Investigation of long period amplifications in the Greater Bangkok basin by microtremor observations

3.3. Waveform Cross-Correlation, Earthquake Locations and HYPODD

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

[S06 ] Shear Wave Resonances in Sediments on the Deep Sea Floor

SEISMIC SURVEYS FOR IMAGING THE REGOLITH

Seismological laboratory in Agua Negra tunnel

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

Characterization of Induced Seismicity in a Petroleum Reservoir: A Case Study

Transcription:

San Jacinto Fault Zone and Sage Brush Flat High Frequency Experiments Frank Vernon! Scripps Institution of Oceanography! University of California, San Diego!! 2015 Udine AUG! 13 March 2015!

Southern California Major Ruptures

San Jacinto Fault Zone

San Jacinto Fault Zone Realtime Virtual Observing Network ANZA Seismic Network (24) Plate Boundary Observatory (8) Southern California Seismic Network (~30) UC Santa Barbara (3) PASSCAL 5 Linear Fault Crossing Arrays 45 total elements 20 stand alone stations 8 Borehole Strainmeters 12 Permanent GPS

The SJFZ Project Deployment Map

PASSCAL Ad Hoc Telemetry

PASSCAL Ad Hoc Telemetry

PASSCAL Ad Hoc Telemetry

Trifurca(on Area

Trifurca(on Area 1 km Resolu(on Tomography Original loca(ons in blue! Reloca(ons in red

Original loca(ons in blue! Reloca(ons in red Hot Springs 1 km Resolu(on Tomography

3Drelocate (Alpha) - Towards a Contributed Software Package for Earthquake Location Inversions Using 3D Velocity Models Amir Allam UAF Malcolm White - UCSD

Basic Components generate_ttimes_fm3d Command line tool An I/O wrapper around fm3d Builds source-to-station travel-time lookup files, accounting for 3D seismic velocity structure 3Drelocate Command line tool Interfaces Antelope database with inversion algorithm in loctools3d.core_tools Can be replaced with interface to any data format

Basic Components loctools3d.core_tools Python module Implements location inversion algorithm Implements internal data structures to allow for interface layer to be written for any data format fm3d (N. Rawlinson) 3D wave-front tracking software Accounts for 3D seismic velocity structure Essential third-party component

Methodology Input P- Wave arrival time observations Brute force grid search Sub- grid inversion Output location

3D sdobs vs Max Az Gap

3D epicentral distance vs Max Az Gap

3D hypocentral distance vs Max Az Gap

3d vs 1D all data

3d vs 1D all data

3d vs 1D Max Az Gap < 200

3d vs 1D Max Az Gap < 200

3d vs 1D

3d vs 1D

3d vs 1D

3d vs 1D

3d vs 1D

3d vs 1D

Sage Brush Flats Nodal Deployment SJFZ experiment 70 seismic stations 5 linear fault crossing arrays 2010 through present Sage Brush Flats Clark Fault surface trace Large amount of local seismicity Accessible

San Jacinto Fault Zone Dense Array (Left) Regional seismic stations (blue triangles) and seismicity (red circles) of plate-boundary region in southern California. (Bottom right) Over 70 additional (red triangles) instruments and dense linear arrays across and around the SJFZ. (Top right) Highly-dense rectangular array with 1108 vertical-component nodes. The green dots are locations of Betsy gun shots.

Scientific targets include: Detailed imaging of the fault zone damage on the top few 100m with noise, explosions and earthquake data Detailed imaging of deeper sections with head and trapped waves Quantifying the coherency of high frequency wave propagation near the surface Construction of very detailed local event catalog

Sage Brush Flats - Clark Fault

Sage Brush Flats - Nodal Array

Sage Brush Flats - Oblique View

Line 09 explosion

Potential trapped waves Line explosi

Line 14 explosion

Potential trapped waves Lin explo

Combined Zone of SJFZ Trapping Structure explosion

Median power (amplitude squared) recorded for duration of experiment This zone of amplified motion is associated with possible trapping structure (see next slides) This zone is associated with landowners home and machines (cultural noise), plus possible small sedimentary basin

Seismicity during Nodal Experiment Sage Brush Flats

M2 Event, Distance:10.68 km Possible fault zone trapping structure

Example data and correlations from the dense deployment Station R3413 Spectrogram for day 145 Time (hours) 24h data for day 145 Station R3513 Spectrogram for day 145 24h data for day 145 CC 10Hz-100Hz CC 50Hz-100Hz CC 100Hz-200Hz

Ambient Noise Cross-correlation Preliminary Results Line 13 600 meters in length 55 elements 6-18 Hz

Ambient Noise Cross-correlation Surface wave velocity profile from tomographic inversion at 30 Hz

P wave M L 1.5 Epicentral distance 11.3 km Azimuth 120

P wave M L 2.3 Epicentral distance 7 km Azimuth 329