Determination of the Neutron Component of the Cosmic Radiation Field in Spacecraft using a PADC Neutron Personal Dosemeter

Similar documents
Neutron dose assessments for MATROSHKA using the HPA PADC dosemeter

Geant4 simulation of SOI microdosimetry for radiation protection in space and aviation environments

Update on Calibration Studies of the Canadian High-Energy Neutron Spectrometry System (CHENSS)

DOSIMETRY ON THE FOTON M2/BIOPAN-5 SATELLITE

Neutron dosimetry and microdosimetry with track etch based LET spectrometer

THE CERN EU HIGH-ENERGY REFERENCE FIELD (CERF) FACILITY FOR DOSIMETRY AT COMMERCIAL FLIGHT ALTITUDES AND IN SPACE

Calibration of the GNU and HSREM neutron survey instruments

František SPURNÝ, Iva JADRNÍCKOVÁ. Nuclear Physics Institute Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

Bubble Detector Characterization for Space Radiation

Space Weather Activities at the AIT Austrian Institute of Technology

Preliminary results of SI2 experiment obtained by PADC track etch detectors J. Szabó, J. K. Pálfalvi, B. Dudás

Energy response for high-energy neutrons of multi-functional electronic personal dosemeter

Calculation of Bubble Detector Response Using Data from the Matroshka-R Study

A new neutron monitor for pulsed fields at high-energy accelerators

Measuring dose equivalent in an aviation environment using PIN diodes

ERINDA PAC 1/4 Testing the UAB Extended Range Bonner Sphere Spectrometer for high energy neutrons UU-TSL, Uppsala, Sweden UAB Barcelona

The CERN-EU high-energy Reference Field (CERF) facility for dosimetry at commercial flight altitudes and in space

LONG-TERM MONITORING OF THE ONBOARD AIRCRAFT EXPOSURE LEVEL WITH Si-DIODE BASED SPECTROMETER ) F. Spurný (1), Ts. Dachev (2)

PR157 Characterization of particle detectors and dosemeters used at flight altitudes and on space missions

Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (CEA/LIST/LNHB), France (2) ENEA-Radiation Protection Institute, Bologna, Italy (3)

CHARACTERIZATION OF A RADIATION DETECTOR FOR AIRCRAFT MEASUREMENTS

Validation of the UFS Bonner Sphere Spectrometer and Monte Carlo Methods at the CERN-EU high energy Reference Field (CERF)

(PHENS) for Active Diagnostics of Radiation Environment in Spacecraft

Development of a Passive Dosimeter for Life Science Experiments in Space (PADLES) in NASDA

NSRL-ICCHIBAN Brief Report, ICCHIBAN-7&8 Announcement and Future ICCHIBAN Experiments

Theoretical Assessment of Aircrew Exposure to Galactic Cosmic Radiation Using the FLUKA Monte Carlo Code

Verification of Response of Neutron Monitor for In-Flight Neutron Dosimetry

ICRP Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection

Portable, Low-cost Proportional Counters for Space, Atmospheric and Ground based Applications

Neutron and/or photon response of a TLD-albedo personal dosemeter on an ISO slab phantom

Energetic Particles Generated in Earlier Pd + D Nuclear Reactions

DOSIMETRY AND MICRODOSIMETRY ONBOARD ISS AND RELATED TOPICS František SPURNÝ, Iva JADRNÍČKOVÁ, Karel TUREK

ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE POUR LA RECHERCHE NUCLEAIRE EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH

Evaluation of Various Material Properties to Shield from Cosmic Radiation Using FLUKA Transport Code

Christian Theis, Stefan Roesler and Helmut Vincke. Abstract

Yukio Uchihori, Nakahiro Yasuda, Hisashi Kitamura, Iva Jadrnickova, Eric R. Benton, A. Shurshakov on behalf of ICCHIBAN Working Group and

Experimental Microdosimetry in High Energy Radiation Fields

Dose rate measurements of charged and neutral particles in the stratosphere

Republic. Sept. 3rd th WRMISS in Budapest 1

Commissioning of the Beta Secondary Standard (BSS2)

Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2007), Vol. 126, No. 1 4, pp Advance Access publication 23 May 2007

As early as 1990, the International

PHITS calculation of the radiation field in HIMAC BIO

Contribution of the Nuclear Physics Institute of the AS CR to the BEOBAL Project

PoS(FNDA2006)016. A New Neutron Beam Facility at TSL. Alexander V. Prokofiev *, Olle Byström, Curt Ekström, Volker Ziemann

ICRP Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection

InterComparison for Cosmic-ray with Heavy Ion Beams At NIRS

Recent Activities on Neutron Calibration Fields at FRS of JAERI

Bonner Sphere Spectrometer. Cruzate, J.A.; Carelli, J.L. and Gregori, B.N.

Passive dosimetry in the Service (Zvezda) module: J.K. Pálfalvi1

Space Radiation Dosimetry - Recent Measurements and Future Tasks


Track Etch Detectors (TED)

CONSIDERATION ON THE H p(10) AND H*(10) SECONDARY STANDARD CHAMBER CHARACTERISTICS

In-Situ Estimation of Cosmic Radiation Exposure During High-Altitude, Long-Distance Commercial Flights

Personal Dose Monitoring System

A Measuring System with Recombination Chamber for Photoneutron Dosimetry at Medical Linear Accelerators

Response characteristics of neutron survey instruments. Rick Tanner and David Bartlett, NRPB Hamid Tagziria and David Thomas, NPL

Aircrew Exposure from Cosmic Radiation on Commercial Airline Routes

Neutron Dosimetry with Ion Chamber-Based DIS System

Fast-Neutron Production via Break-Up of Deuterons and Fast-Neutron Dosimetry

1. RADIOACTIVITY AND RADIATION PROTECTION

Dosimetry for space radiation in ISS lifescience experiments using PADLES system

Determination of Ambient Dose Equivalent at INFLPR 7 MeV Linear Accelerator

The scanning microbeam PIXE analysis facility at NIRS

Unfolding of neutron spectra with an experimentally determined diamond detector response function

Advacam, Prague, Czech Republic. Nuclear Physics Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic

Early Influence by Cosmic Radiation

Neutron Metrology Activities at CIAE (2009~2010)

Performance Test of the Electronic Personal Neutron Dosemeter in Neutron Fields Simulating Workplaces of MOX Fuel Fabrication Facilities

Test of the rem-counter WENDI-II from Eberline in different energy-dispersed neutron fields

CERN-TIS ~!! )

H. Koshiishi, H. Matsumoto, A. Chishiki, T. Goka, and T. Omodaka. Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

Energy Response Characteristics of Several Neutron Measuring Devices Determined By Using the Scattered Neutron Calibration Fields of KAERI

Introduction to neutron sources

COSMIC RADIATION AND AIRCREW EXPOSURE

Nuclear data for advanced nuclear systems

The vertical cut-off rigidity means that charged particle with rigidity below this value cannot reach the top of atmosphere because of the earth's

High-energy quasi-monoenergetic neutron fields: existing facilities and future needs

EVIDOS: Optimisation of Individual Monitoring in Mixed Neutron/Photon Fields at Workplaces of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Characterization of the 3 MeV Neutron Field for the Monoenergetic Fast Neutron Fluence Standard at the National Metrology Institute of Japan

A Personal Use Program for Calculation of Aviation Route Doses

Measurements and Simulations of Single-Event Upsets in a 28-nm FPGA. Hans Calén, Tord Johansson, Karoly Makónyi, Pawel Marciniewski

Measurements with the new PHE Neutron Survey Instrument

Radiation Protection Dosimetry Advance Access published October 28, Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2010), pp. 1 8

The Cosmic Ray Telescope for the Effects of Radiation (CRaTER) Investigation for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

IAC-08-A MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS OF ENERGY LOSSES BY SPACE PROTONS IN THE CRATER DETECTOR

High resolution neutron spectrometry with liquid scintillation detectors for fusion applications

Radiation Environment and Radiation Dosimetry in the Upper Atmosphere

Full solar rotations observed by the SOLAR payload on the ISS in December 2012 and June 2013.

Long-term PTB intercomparison of passive H*(10) dosemeters used in area monitoring

International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG ISSN: Vol.8, No.3, pp , 2015

8 th Workshop on Radiation Monitoring for the International Space Station

8 th International Workshop on Radiation Safety at Synchrotron Radiation Sources

Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions

Fast neutron beams. Andy Buffler and Ricky Smit. in support of the Radioactive-Ion Beam project at ithemba LABS

Cosmic Radiation and Flight Operation

Some problems to be solved for automatic analysis of a CR-39 nuclear track detector in space radiation

Digital imaging of charged particle track structures with a low-pressure optical time projection chamber

Status of ISS-RAD. Cary Zeitlin, Southwest Research Institute On behalf of the ISS-RAD Team

Transcription:

Determination of the Neutron Component of the Cosmic Radiation Field in Spacecraft using a PADC Neutron Personal Dosemeter (i) Determination of the neutron component (ii) Response to HZE (iii) Preliminary results of STS measurements David Bartlett, Luke Hager and Rick Tanner National Radiological Protection Board

(i) Neutron component Routine issue NRPB PADC neutron personal dosemeters, electrochemically etched, automatically read Charged particle threshold ~ 30 kev µm -1 (for protons, E p < 1 MeV) Neutrons + neutron-like interactions of protons Calibration factor determined for the calculated neutron field in spacecraft

Etched Track Detector Response Characteristics Reading Normalized to 241 Am-Be (H p (10) New ) 2.0 1.0 0 PTB PADC Dual Freq' Electrochemical Etch NRPB PADC Electrochemical Etch PSI Chemical Etch 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 Neutron Energy (ev) FZK Makrofol

Energy Dependence of Response of the NRPB Passive Survey Instrument Radiation Field Net tracks (a) per unit fluence (cm 2 10-6 ) Net tracks per unit effective dose (ISO) (msv -1 ) Net tracks per unit ambient dose equivalent (msv -1 ) 144 kev (PTB) 2.25 (0.38) (b) 66 (11) (b) 17.7 (11) (b) 542 kev (PTB) 14.4 (1.3) 182 (16) 42.9 (3.9) 1.13 MeV (PTB) 30.3 (2) 242 (16) 71.5 (4.7) 2.5 MeV (PTB) 41.8 (2.3) 208 (11) 100 (5.5) 5 MeV (PTB) 38.5 (1.7) 142 (6) 95.1 (4.2) 8 MeV (PTB) 35.3 (1.4) 119 (5) 86.3 (3.4) 14.8 MeV (PTB) 48.7 (2.4) 145 (7) 90.9 (4.5) 18.73 MeV (PTB) In progress 60.2 MeV (UCL) 53 (5) 148 (14) 74 (7) 68 MeV (TSL) 42 (13) 115 (36) 106 (33) 95 MeV (TSL) 30 (9) 75 (23) 83 (25) 100 MeV (ithemba) In progress 160 MeV (ithemba) In progress 173 MeV (TSL) 20 (6) 38 (11) 68 (20) (a) (b) Average of three angles Statistical uncertainty (s) on instrument reading added in quadrature to total standard uncertainty on fluence.

0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0 Neutron Energy Distributions CERF Calibration Field Aircraft at 35,000 ft Wilson STS36 10-3 10-2 10-1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10 10 11 Energy, ev Fluence in a bin ( i ) per logarithmic bin width (lnei+1 - lne i ) Normalized to unity for total fluence

NRPB survey instrument calculated and measured responses in cosmic radiation neutron fields Neutron Spectrum Instrument reading (a) per unit fluence (tracks cm 2 10-6 ) Instrument reading per unit effective dose (ISO) (msv -1 ) Instrument reading per unit ambient dose equivalent (msv -1 ) Wilson et al. STS 36 33.2 (3.9) (b) 109 94 Heinrich et al. 35,000 ft 18.9 (2.4) (b) 95 82 Rancati et al. CERF 25.5 (4.2) (b) 109 98 (calculated) Rancati et al. CERF (measured) 29.8 (2.0) (c) (a) Average of three angles (b) Uncertainty by folding mean response ± s with spectrum (c) Statistical uncertainty (1 s) on instrument reading only

CERN: top concrete position; neutron monitor, ionization chamber, SSM1, TEPCs (ARCS, ISPN, CIEMAT, SSI)

40 Neutron PADC dosemeter Calibrations in simulated high energy cosmic radiation field at CERN Fluence Response Tracks per neutron per cm 2 (x 10-6 ) 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Individual sheet results Mean for that measurement +- SEM 0 April 1998 July 1998 June 1999 August 1999 May 2000 July 2000 Jul 2002 Calibration Date

Measured Neutron Ambient Dose Equivalent Rates at Temperate Latitudes (40 60 0 N) Altitude Neutron H*(10) Investigator rate ( Sv h -1 ) 10.6 km DIAS 3.2 (0.3) (a) (35 000 ft) USAAR 3.5 (0.8) SSI 3.1 (0.3) NRPB 3.8 (0.5) 16 km NRPB 7.8 (0.5) (53 000 ft) DIAS 7.1 (0.6) ANPA 6.1 (0.5) 20 km NRPB 9.2 (0.9) (67,000 ft) NASA 8.0 (a) One standard deviation for repeated measurements

Conclusions from Aircraft Measurement Programme Good agreement of measured and calculated instrument readings for CERF Broad agreement with results for other etched track detector systems Good agreement of in-flight measurements with other systems

(ii) Response to charged particles PADC neutron personal dosemeter responds to neutrons plus neutron-like interactions of highenergy protons Only responds directly to protons of E p < about 1 MeV at the surface to be etched Some response to heavier charged particles LET 200 > about 30 kev m -1, depending on particle type Can generally distinguish HZE electrochemically etched tracks by second chemical etch

CERF Electrochemical etch

Brookhaven Fe 1000MeV per nucleon Electrochemical etch

Tracks per particle 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 HIMAC Japan 2002 56 Fe 28 Si Electrochemical Etch 12 C 0.0 0 15 30 45 60 75 Angle, degrees from normal incidence

Charged particle angle dependence of relative response 56 Fe 464 MeV/n 28 Si 469 MeV/n 0º 15º 30º 60º 75º Forward 2π (ISO free air) ISO on body 0.90 0.85 0.70 0.30 0 30% to 40% 15% to 20% 0.50 0.55 0.02 0 0 about 5% about 2%

11.5 hours 20% NaOH at 40 0 C followed contiguously by 8 hours 20% NaOH at 40 0 C at 23.5 kvcm -1 18 hours 20% NaOH at 80 0 C

Brookhaven Fe 1000MeV per nucleon Electrochemical etch + chemical etch

CERF Electrochemical etch + chemical etch

STS 105

Uppsala 100 MeV neutron

(iii) Preliminary results for STS measurements Use response data for NRPB passive survey instrument for area passive dosemeter measurements Calculate response using monoenergetic data folded with the Wilson STS 36 neutron energy distribution Determine net neutron tracks after chemical etch and subtraction of long range particle tracks Uncorrected results in good agreement with other estimates of the neutron component of dose equivalent Preliminary - need correction for track fading and ageing

Results of measurements of neutron component on STS flights Flight (duration) Detector Tracks Net Tracks (a) Estimated Neutron Tracks) (c) Neutron H*(10) (msv) Neutron E(ISO) (msv) H*(10) rate (µsv d -1 ) STS 97 (10d 20h) D100726 D100761 185 175 171 (14) (b) 160 (14) 130 133 1.19 1.22 1.38 1.41 110 113 STS 98 (12d 21.3h) D100722 237 226 (16) 201 1.84 2.13 144 STS 104 (12d 18.6h) D102042 232 219 (17) 178 1.64 1.90 127 STS 105 (11d 21h) D102010 D102035 198 227 170(16) 201(17) 140 172 1.29 1.58 1.49 1.83 108 132 STS 108 (10d 20h) D102070 205 177(15) 136 1.24 1.44 115 STS 112 (10d 20h) D108124 D108126 204 201 188 (16) 185 (16) 153 152 1.41 1.39 1.63 1.62 130 130 (a)background and transit control subtracted, linearity corrected. (b)standard deviation assuming Poisson distribution for observed tracks with standard deviation on background and transit controls added in quadrature. (a)after chemical etch and subtraction of long-range tracks.

Neutron ambient dose equivalent rate of 110 to 145 µsv d -1 Average neutron effective dose rate about 15% larger Consistent with the neutron component inferred from other measurements

Application as area passive dosemeter or personal dosemeter Estimate of neutron component only of dose equivalent 200µSv to 100 msv, but no dose rate information; robust; no power supply; contains no flammable gases; no supervision; relatively small size; well-proven reliable and simple detectors (but full track analysis of PADC detector to get H > 10 kev µm -1 better option) Use with (i) small ionization chamber (DIS?) but absorbed dose not dose equivalent need Q (w R?) or correction factor to get non-neutron component of effective dose (ii) TLD or OSL with correction for charged particle response and for Q (w R?) part of integrated scheme with calculated values of field quantities and effective dose

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Irradiations carried out at the The Svedberg Laboratory were supported under the European Commission Research Infrastructure programme and those at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) and at the Université Catholique Louvain were funded by the European Commission RTD Programme: Nuclear Energy, Euratom Framework Programme V, 1998-2002, Contract N FIGM-CT-2000-00068 The authors should like to thank Yukio Uchihori, N Yasuda, Eric Benton and their colleagues at NIRS; Frank Wissmann, Helmut Schuhmacher and Ralph Nolte at PTB; Alexander Prokofiev, Jan Blomgren, Per-Ulf Renberg and Nils Ollson at TSL; Marco Silari, Evangelia Dimovasili, Sabine Mayer and Angela Mitaroff at CERN; and Edward Semones and Mike Golightly at NASA, for their help with these investigations. One of us (DTB) should especially like to thank Graham Stevenson and Manfred Höfert of CERN for many useful discussions on these matters over several years.