1
Stationary Booster Reflectors for Solar Thermal Process Heat Generation Dr Stefan Hess a), Prof Vic Hanby b) a) Solar Thermal Energy Research Group (STERG) Stellenbosch University b) De Montfort University Leicester, UK 2
Stationary Concentrators Efficiency Tests and Output Simulation Monitoring of a Pilot Plant Marginal Costs Summary and Outlook 3
External Compound Parabolic Concentrators (CPC s) Very common: CPC s for evacuated tube collectors (Weiss and Rommel 2008) External CPC for flat evacuated SRB collector (Picture: Intersolar Munich 2011) 4
Flat booster reflectors Flat-plate collector field with corrugated aluminium sheet booster reflectors in Östhammer, Sweden. Picture: Karlsson, cp. (Rönnelid and Karlsson 1999) 5
s s anisotropic anisotropic isotropic isotropic Horizon Horizon G bt = Beam irradiance (Aperture 5.72 ) G st = Diffuse from sky G rt = Diffuse from ground RefleC-Collector at pilot plant Laguna (positive transversal incidence angle indicated) 6
Stationary Concentrators Efficiency Tests and Output Simulation Monitoring of a Pilot Plant Marginal Costs Summary and Outlook 7
Collector efficiency η [ - ] Measured efficiency curves of RefleC and its flat-plate 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Flat-plate LBM 4 GF (glass + foil) RefleC 6 (LBM 4 GF) Ambient temperature 0.1 Global irradiance 0.0 25 40 55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 175 190 205 Mean fluid temperature T f [ C ] 8
Diffuse distribution from Brunger model (48 classes) Distribution of diffuse irradiance for a slightly covered sky k = 0.95, kt= 0.35 Distribution of diffuse irradiance for a clear sky k = 0.25, kt= 0.75 k = fraction of diffuse k t = clearness index 9
s anisotropic isotropic Hess, S. and Hanby, V. I. (2014). Collector Simulation Model with Dynamic Incidence Angle Modifier for Anisotropic Diffuse Irradiance. Energy Procedia 48(0): 87-96 Horizon Three modes for diffuse-iam: Mode 1: Anisotropic for sky (dynamic), isotropic for ground (once per sim) G bt = Beam irradiance G st = Diffuse from sky G rt = Diffuse from ground Mode 2: Isotropic for sky (once per sim), isotropic for ground (one per sim) Mode 3: Manual input of one hemispheric IAM for isotropic diffuse 10
Collector gain [kwh / (m 2 fp a)] 800 600 + 66 % Additional gain reflector Flat-plate LBM 4 GF 400 + 3 % 200 + 26 % + 8 % 0 T_in = 40 C Mode 3 (isotropic) T_in = 40 C Mode 1 (anisotropic) T_in = 120 C Mode 3 (isotropic) T_in = 120 C Mode 1 (anisotropic) Annual output of RefleC 6 GF (blue plus red) and its receiver LBM 4 GF (blue) in Würzburg. Output increase by booster is 20 % at constant T in = 40 C and 87 % at T in = 120 C 11
Stationary Concentrators Efficiency Tests and Output Simulation Monitoring of a Pilot Plant Marginal Costs Summary and Outlook 12
Reference flat-plates (glass-foil, front) and new RefleC-collectors (back) System Flow collector field 13
Increased temperatures for solar loop and storage Three thermal loads on process- and supply level RefleC 2 x 20,2 m² T max = 130 C p sys = 6 bar 1000 l storage 120 C 3 bar Boiler feedwater 90 C 110 C 4,6 m³ / d Flat-plates (glass + foil) 16,2 m² Stagnation cooler Primary storage 2x1000l stora 110 ge C 3 bar Secondary storages 300l 60 C Boiler makeupwater 20 C - 90 C 3 m³ / d Washing machines 20 C - 60 C 1 m³ / d Fig: Simplified system concept of the RefleC pilot plant 14
Sum per average day [kwh / (m 2 fp d)] Additional gains over 16 months 6 5 4 Global irradiance G_t (aperture-specific) Gain flat-plate (aperturespecific) Gain RefleC (per flat-plate aperture) + 39.1 % all temperatures + 78.1 % T 80 C 3 2 1 0 Jul 10 Aug 10 Sep 10 Oct 10 Nov 10 Dec 10 Jan 11 Feb 11 Mar 11 Apr 11 May 11 Jun 11 Jul 11 Aug 11 Sep 11 Oct 11 15
Stationary Concentrators Efficiency Tests and Output Simulation Monitoring of a Pilot Plant Marginal Costs Summary and Outlook 16
Parameters: K inv = K sol Q sol f a Field simulations: additional gain boosters Würzburg = 126.0 kwh/m 2 Seville 212.5 kwh/m 2 flat plate Monitoring: system efficiency 0.86 (i.e. 108 kwh/m 2 fp supplied in Wb) Conventional heat 0.06 EUR/kWh, aim for solar heat 0.04 EUR/kWh Lifetime 20 years, interest rate 4 %, no costs for maintenance & operation Results: Investment in Würzburg max. 40 EUR/m 2 of booster (= 480 EUR/LBM fp), amortization static: 9 years Seville: 67 EUR/m2 booster (= 804 EUR/LBM); amortization 5.4 years Calculated according to VDI 6002, 2004 17
Dissertation available: www.reiner-lemoine-stiftung.de Previous research undervalued increase by boosters Increase in annual gain largely independent of collector working temperature process heat! Cost/performance ratio increases with higher overall irradiation. Marginal reflector costs in regions with higher irradiance to be determined (e.g. South Africa Solar PACES) RefleC-boosters for other stationary collectors Comparison to other collector types for various applications 18
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: CONTACT DETAILS: Dr Stefan Hess Solar Thermal Energy Research Group (STERG) Stellenbosch University South Africa stefanhess@sun.ac.za +27 (0)21 808 4016 visit us: concentrating.sun.ac.za 19
SATIM 2014. Assumptions and Methodologies in the South African TIMES (SATIM) Energy Model. Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town: http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/research/esystems-group-satim.htm Blackdotenergy 2015. Commercial installations in SA: http://www.blackdotenergy.co.za 4 % Nuclear 6 % Fuel + others Hess, S. 2014. Low-Concentrating, Stationary Solar Thermal Collectors for Process Heat Generation. Dissertation. Leicester University. www.reiner-lemoine-stiftung.de Hess, S. and Hanby, V. I. (2014). Collector Simulation Model with Dynamic Incidence Angle Modifier for Anisotropic Diffuse Irradiance. Energy Procedia 48(0): 87-96 IEA 2012. IEA Technology Roadmap Solar Heating and Cooling. International Energy Agency. Paris. URL: http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/ 85 % Coal Solar_Heating_Cooling_Roadmap_2012_WEB.pdf IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency) 2015. Solar Heat for Industrial Processes. Technology Brief. Available from www.irena.org/publications [Accessed 1 April 2015]. 5 % Hydro + RE Lauterbach, C., Schmitt, B., Jordan, U. and Vajen, K. 2012. The potential of solar heat for industrial processes in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16(7): 5121-5130. Rönnelid, M. and Karlsson, B. (1999). "The Use of Corrugated Booster Reflectors for Solar Collector Fields." Solar Energy 65(6): 343-351. 20
Primary storage tank (left), two parallel secondary storages (center), expansion vessel and the hot water storage for the washing machines 21
Fig.: Screenshot from OptiCad 22
theta_t = 0 A ap 23
theta_t = 10 A ap 24
theta_t = 20 A ap 25
theta_t = 25 A ap 26
theta_t = 30 A ap 27
theta_t = 40 A ap 28