Correlation functions in optics; classical and quantum 2. TUW, Vienna, Austria, April 2018 Luis A. Orozco

Similar documents
Top Le# side TEST Right side bo.om

Conditional Measurements in cavity QED. Luis A. Orozco Joint Quantum Institute Department of Physics

Top Le# side TEST Right side bo.om

Correlation functions in optics and quantum optics, 4

Top Le# side TEST Right side bo.om

Innovation and Development of Study Field. nano.tul.cz

Solutions for Exercise session I

8 Incoherent fields and the Hanbury Brown Twiss effect

Detection of Single Photon Emission by Hanbury-Brown Twiss Interferometry

Luz e Átomos. como ferramentas para Informação. Quântica. Quântica Ótica. Marcelo Martinelli. Lab. de Manipulação Coerente de Átomos e Luz

Single photons. how to create them, how to see them. Alessandro Cerè

The Hanbury Brown Twiss effect for matter waves. Chris Westbrook Laboratoire Charles Fabry, Palaiseau Workshop on HBT interferometry 12 may 2014

MESOSCOPIC QUANTUM OPTICS

Intensity correlations in cavity QED

Coherent states, beam splitters and photons

Quantum optics. Marian O. Scully Texas A&M University and Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik. M. Suhail Zubairy Quaid-i-Azam University

Quantum optics of many-body systems

Hong-Ou-Mandel effect with matter waves

Lab 1 Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities

CORRELATION BETWEEN PHOTONS IN TWO COHERENT BEAMS OF LIGHT

Contribution of the Hanbury Brown Twiss experiment to the development of quantum optics

Γ43 γ. Pump Γ31 Γ32 Γ42 Γ41

Single Semiconductor Nanostructures for Quantum Photonics Applications: A solid-state cavity-qed system with semiconductor quantum dots

Optics, Light and Lasers

Single Photon Nonlinear Optics with Cavity enhanced Quantum Electrodynamics

Dispersive Readout, Rabi- and Ramsey-Measurements for Superconducting Qubits

Slow and stored light using Rydberg atoms

Single-photon NV sources. Pauli Kehayias March 16, 2011

Solid State Physics IV -Part II : Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena

Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss Photon Antibunching Setup

Quantum Ghost Imaging by Measuring Reflected Photons

January 2010, Maynooth. Photons. Myungshik Kim.

10.5 Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Contents. qued-hbt. Hanbury-Brown-Twiss Add-On. qued-hbt Manual V qued-hbt: Hanbury-Brown-Twiss Manual Quickstart Manual...

Nonlinear Oscillators and Vacuum Squeezing

Elements of Quantum Optics

Laboratory 3&4: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup for Photon Antibunching

Quantum and Nano Optics Laboratory. Jacob Begis Lab partners: Josh Rose, Edward Pei

Multimode semiconductor laser: quantum versus classical behavior

Cavity QED: Quantum Control with Single Atoms and Single Photons. Scott Parkins 17 April 2008

Exploring the quantum dynamics of atoms and photons in cavities. Serge Haroche, ENS and Collège de France, Paris

Single Emitter Detection with Fluorescence and Extinction Spectroscopy

Efficient routing of single photons by one atom and a microtoroidal cavity

3. Excitation and Detection of Fluorescence

Laboratory 3: Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Single Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury Brown, and Twiss Setup for Photon Antibunching

Single Photon Generation & Application

Introduction. Chapter Background. 1.2 Motivation

MODERN OPTICS. P47 Optics: Unit 9

Erwin Schrödinger and his cat

Some Topics in Optics

Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Laboratory

Quantum optics and squeezed states of light

Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Laboratory Review

Introduction to Modern Quantum Optics

Lab 3 and 4: Single Photon Source

Supplementary Information: Three-dimensional quantum photonic elements based on single nitrogen vacancy-centres in laser-written microstructures

Quantum Reservoir Engineering

The Hanbury Brown and Twiss effect: from stars to cold atoms

Conditional control of quantum beats in a cavity QED system

Photonic Micro and Nanoresonators

Photon Blockade with Memory and Slow Light using a Single Atom in an Optical Cavity

Testing The Existence of Single Photons

Path Entanglement. Liat Dovrat. Quantum Optics Seminar

Photon correlation vs. interference of single-atom fluorescence in a half-cavity

Frequency dependent squeezing for quantum noise reduction in second generation Gravitational Wave detectors. Eleonora Capocasa

Single Atom wants to meet Single Photon Controlled Processes with Neutral Atoms

Multiparticle Entanglement and Interference in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics

Quantum Feedback Stabilized Solid-State Emitters

Theory for strongly coupled quantum dot cavity quantum electrodynamics

Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics

Interferometric. Gravitational Wav. Detectors. \p World Scientific. Fundamentals of. Peter R. Sawlson. Syracuse University, USA.

Summary lecture IX. The electron-light Hamilton operator reads in second quantization

Confocal Microscope Imaging of Single emitter fluorescence and Observing Photon Antibunching Using Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup. Lab.

Spontaneous Emission and the Vacuum State of EM Radiation. Miriam Klopotek 10 December 2007

Lab 3-4 : Confocal Microscope Imaging of Single-Emitter Fluorescence and Hanbury-Brown and Twiss Set Up, Photon Antibunching

(ˆn + 1)t e e + exp. i g2. The interaction part is, for small times t, given by. (ˆn + 1)t +... ˆσ ee +

Quantum correlations and atomic speckle

Entanglement Enabled Intensity Interferometry

Cavity QED with Rydberg Atoms Serge Haroche, Collège de France & Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON

Statistics. on Single Molecule Photon. Diffusion. Influence of Spectral

Thermal Noise in Non-Equilibrium Steady State Hannah Marie Fair Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (August 2014)

Supplementary information for Quantum delayed-choice experiment with a beam splitter in a quantum superposition

Labs 3-4: Single-photon Source

LAB 3: Confocal Microscope Imaging of single-emitter fluorescence. LAB 4: Hanbury Brown and Twiss setup. Photon antibunching. Roshita Ramkhalawon

In Situ Imaging of Cold Atomic Gases

Optomechanics and spin dynamics of cold atoms in a cavity

Single Photon detectors

9 Atomic Coherence in Three-Level Atoms

Stellar Intensity Interferometric Capabilities of IACT Arrays*

A few Experimental methods for optical spectroscopy Classical methods Modern methods. Remember class #1 Generating fast LASER pulses

Ion trap quantum processor

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

Astronomy 203 practice final examination

Correlations and Fluctuations

How to use the simulator

AN OVERVIEW OF LIGO Adapted from material developed by Brock Wells Robert L. Olds Junior High School, Connell, WA August 2001

Contents Classical and Quantum Interference and Coherence Quantum Interference in Atomic Systems: Mathematical Formalism

Intensity Interferometry with SPADs

Single-Photon Techniques for the Detection of Periodic Optical Signals

Transcription:

Correlation functions in optics; classical and quantum 2. TUW, Vienna, Austria, April 2018 Luis A. Orozco www.jqi.umd.edu

Correlations in optics

Reference that includes pulsed sources: Zheyu Jeff Ou Quantum Optics for Experimentalists World Scientific, Singapore 2017

The study of noisy signals uses correlation functions. <F(t) F(t+τ) > <F(t) G(t+τ)> For optical signals the variables usually are: Field and Intensity. Photocurrent with noise:

How do we measure these functions? G (1) (τ) = <E(t)* E(t+τ)> field-field G (2) (τ) = <I(t) I(t+τ)> intensity-intensity H(τ) = <I(t) E(t+τ)> intensity-field

Correlation functions tell us something about fluctuations. The correlation functions have classical limits. They are related with conditional measurements. They give the probability of an event given that something has happened.

Mach Zehnder or Michelson Interferometer Field Field Correlation ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( * (1) t I t E t E g τ τ + = τ τ ωτ π ω d g i exp F ) ( ) ( 2 1 ) ( (1) = Spectrum: This is the basis of Fourier Spectroscopy

Handbury Brown and Twiss Can we use fluctuations, noise, to measre the size of a star? They were radio astronomers. R. Hanbury Brown and R.Q. Twiss, A New Type of Interferometer for Use in Radio Astronomy, Phil. Mag. 46, 663 (1954).

Flux collectors at Narrabri R.Hanbury Brown: The Stellar Interferometer at Narrabri Observatory Sky and Telescope 28, No.2, 64, August 1964

Narrabri intensity interferometer with its circular railway track R.Hanbury Brown: BOFFIN. A Personal Story of the Early Days of Radar, Radio Astronomy and Quantum Optics (1991)

The HBT controversy

Source a and b are within a Star. Can we measure the angular distance R/L~θ so that we could know the diameter? Source a: Source b:

The amplitude at detector 1 from sources a and b is: And the intensity I 1 The average over the random phases φ a and φ b gives zero And the product of the intensity of each of the detectors <I 1 ><I 2 > is independent of the separation of the detectors.

Multiply the two intensities and then average. g (2) This function changes as a function of the separation between the detectors. with

Relation to the Michelson Interferometer The term in parenthesis is the associated to the fringe Visibility (first order coherence) if we now take the square of the fringe visibility and average it:

The solution of E. M. Purcell, Nature 178, 1449 (1956). Mentions the work of Forrester first real optical intensity correlation. A. T. Forrester, R. A. Gudmundsen and P. O. Johnson, Photoelectric Mixing of Incoherent Light, Phys. Rev. 99, 1691 (1955). Mentions that bosons tend to appear together Does the calculation and relates it to the first order coherence.

Hanbury Brown and Twiss; Intensity Intensity correlation g (2) ( τ ) = I( t) I( t + τ ) I( t) 2 R. Hanbury Brown and R.Q. Twiss, Correlation between Photons in Two Coherent Beams of Light, Nature 177, 27 (1956).

Correlations of the intensity at τ=0 It is proportional to the variance

Intensity correlations (bounds) 2I ( t) I( t Cauchy-Schwarz 2 + τ ) I ( t) + I ( t +τ ) 2 The correlation is maximal at equal times (τ=0) and it can not increase.

How do we measure them? Build a Periodogram. The photocurrent is proportional to the intensity I(t) n i M i N n i j i I I t I t I I t I I t I + = = + + 0 0 ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( τ τ Discretize the time series. Apply the algorithm on the vector. Careful with the normalization.

Discretize: I i Multiply with displacement : I i+n Add and average:

Another form to measure the correlation with with the waiting time distribution of the photons. The minimum size of the variance of the electromagnetic field. Store the time separation between two consecutive pulses (start and stop). Histogram the separations If the fluctuations are few you get after normalization g (2) (τ). Work at low intensities (low counting rates). Intensity (photons) time

Use a 4me stamp card. Later process the data, then you can calculate all sorts of correla4ons. Digi4ze the full signal (important to iden4fy the nature of the event e.g. par4cle physics).

Simultaneous measurement of g (2) (τ). Digital storage oscilloscope (DO) captures the photocurrent from the photomultiplier tube (PMT). The correlation is calculated later Waiting time distribution with avalanche photodiodes (APD). The time to digital converter (TDC) stores the intervals for later histogramming.

Intensity correlations of a diode laser driven by noise. The Wiener-Khintchine-Kolmogorov gives the unnormalized correlation function G (2) (t) from the power spectral density of the noise.

Power spectrum of the noise source.

Comparison of g (2) (τ) : (a) waiting time distribution of photon counts, (b) time series of photocurrent.

Quantum optics The photon is the smallest fluctuation of the intensity of the intensity of the electromagnetic field, its variance. The photon is the quantum of energy of the electromagnetic field. With energy ħω at frequency ω.

An important point about the quantum calculation g (2) (τ)

Quantum Correlations (Glauber): The intensity operator I is proportional to the number of photons, but the operators have to be normal (:) and time (T) ordered. All the creation operators do the left and the annihilation operators to the right (just as a photodetector works). The operators act in temporal order. R. Glauber, The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963).

At equal times (normal order) : Conmutator : â + â = â â + 1 â + â + â â = â + (ââ + 1)â = â + â â + â â + â â + â + â â = ˆn 2 ˆn where ˆn = â + â The correlation requires detecting two photons, so if we detect one, we have to take that into consideration in the accounting.

In terms of the variance of the photon number: The classical result says:

The quantum correlation function can be zero, as the detection changes the number of photons in the field. This is related to the variance properties: is the variance larger or smaller than the mean (Poissonian, Super-Poissonian or Sub- Poissonian).

At equal times the value gives: g (2) (0)=1 Poissonian g (2) (0)>1 Super-Poissonian g (2) (0)<1 Sub-Poissonian The slope at equal times: g (2) (0)>g (2) (0 + ) Bunched g (2) (0)<g (2) (0 + ) Antibunched Classically we can not have Sub- Poissonian nor Antibunched.

Quantum Correlations (Glauber): g (2) (τ ) = : Î (τ ) : c : Î : If we detect a photon at time t, g (2) (τ) gives the probability of detecting a second photon after a time τ.

Correlation functions as conditional measurements in quantum optics. The detection of the first photon gives the initial state that is going to evolve in time. This may sound as Bayesian probabities. g (1) (t) Interferograms. g (2) (t) Hanbury-Brown and Twiss. Can be used in the process of quantum feedback.

Example with nanofibers

optical nanofibers

Intensity correlations from cold atoms around the nanofiber

g (2) (τ) Classical each atom is like a beacon while around the ONF residuals (σ) 2 0-2 -4-2 0 2 4 τ (µs)

Quantum Correlations g H2L HtL 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ ÊÊ Ê Ê ÊÊÊÊ Ê ÊÊ ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Antibunching and Super-Poissonian Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊÊ ÊÊÊ Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê ÊÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ ÊÊ Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê Ê ÊÊ Ê Ê -4-2 0 2 4 t HmsL See also: S. L. Mielke, G. T. Foster, and L. A. Orozco, "Non-classical intensity correlations in cavity QED," Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3948 (1998).

Relation between temperature and correlation time

Are there quantum effects in optical cavity QED? Look at the intensity fluctuations

Optical Cavity QED Quantum electrodynamics for pedestrians. No need for renormalization. One or a finite number of modes from the cavity. ATOMS + CAVITY Regimes: Perturbative: Coupling<< Dissipation. Atomic decay suppressed or enhanced (cavity smaller than λ/2), changes in the energy levels. Non Perturbative: Coupling>>Dissipation Vacuum Rabi Splittings. Conditional dynamics.

Dipolar coupling between the atom and the mode of the cavity: g = d! El electric field associated with one photon on average in the cavity with volume: V eff is: E v E v =!ω 2ε 0 V eff

LIGHT EMPTY CAVITY PD SIGNAL

Spontaneous emission Coupling Cooperativity for one atom: C 1 Cooperativity for N atoms: C C = g2 1 κγ g κ γ Cavity decay C =C 1 N

Steady State Atomic polarization: -2Cx 1+x 2 y Excitation x Transmission x/y= 1/(1+2C)

Jaynes Cummings Dynamics Rabi Oscillations Exchange of excitation for N atoms: Ω g N

2g Vacuum Rabi Splitting Entangled Not coupled Two normal modes

Transmission doublet different from the Fabry Perot resonance Scaled Transmission 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0-30 -20-10 0 10 20 30 Frequency [MHz]

7 663 536 starts 1 838 544 stops

Classically g (2) (0)> g (2 )(τ) and also g (2) (0)-1 > g (2 )(τ)-1 Non-classical antibunched

Use correlations

79 Gracias