SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Similar documents
Empirical Green s Function Analysis of the Wells, Nevada, Earthquake Source

RELOCATION OF THE MACHAZE AND LACERDA EARTHQUAKES IN MOZAMBIQUE AND THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 2006 Mw7.0 MACHAZE EARTHQUAKE

Rupture process of the 2010 M w 7.8 Mentawai tsunami earthquake from joint inversion of near-field hr-gps and

BROADBAND STRONG MOTION SIMULATION OF THE 2004 NIIGATA- KEN CHUETSU EARTHQUAKE: SOURCE AND SITE EFFECTS

of other regional earthquakes (e.g. Zoback and Zoback, 1980). I also want to find out

JCR (2 ), JGR- (1 ) (4 ) 11, EPSL GRL BSSA

Preliminary slip model of M9 Tohoku earthquake from strongmotion stations in Japan - an extreme application of ISOLA code.

Rupture Process of the Great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake

Earthquake Focal Mechanisms and Waveform Modeling

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

Data Repository: Seismic and Geodetic Evidence For Extensive, Long-Lived Fault Damage Zones

Imaging short-period seismic radiation from the 27 February 2010 Chile (M W 8.8) earthquake by back-projection of P, PP, and PKIKP waves

Magnitude 8.2 NORTHWEST OF IQUIQUE, CHILE

Magnitude 7.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

SOURCE MODELING OF RECENT LARGE INLAND CRUSTAL EARTHQUAKES IN JAPAN AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION FOR STRONG MOTION PREDICTION

Routine Estimation of Earthquake Source Complexity: the 18 October 1992 Colombian Earthquake

Magnitude 7.8 SCOTIA SEA

Source Characteristics of Large Outer Rise Earthquakes in the Pacific Plate

Source model of the 2005 Miyagi-Oki, Japan, earthquake estimated from broadband strong motions

Centroid moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Challenges of Applying Ground Motion Simulation to Earthquake Engineering

Supplementary Materials for

Inversion of Earthquake Rupture Process:Theory and Applications

3.3. Waveform Cross-Correlation, Earthquake Locations and HYPODD

Centroid-moment-tensor analysis of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and its larger foreshocks and aftershocks

Source rupture process of the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake determined by joint inversion of teleseismic body wave and strong ground motion data

Contents of this file

SOURCE INVERSION AND INUNDATION MODELING TECHNOLOGIES FOR TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT, CASE STUDY: 2001 PERU TSUNAMI

SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF STRONG GROUND MOTION CONSIDERING ASPERITY AND DIRECTIVITY OF FAULT

revised October 30, 2001 Carlos Mendoza

High Acceleration Motions generated from the 2011 Pacific coast off Tohoku, Japan Earthquake

ON NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS OF NORMAL AND REVERSE FAULTS FROM VIEWPOINT OF DYNAMIC RUPTURE MODEL

Estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration for Delhi Region using Finsim, a Finite Fault Simulation Technique

Earthquakes and Seismotectonics Chapter 5

BEYOND TRAVELTIMES AND EARTHQUAKE LOCATION What else can seismograms tell us about the nature of earthquakes on faults?

Tomography of the 2011 Iwaki earthquake (M 7.0) and Fukushima

Seismic Source Mechanism

A search for seismic radiation from late slip for the December 26, 2004 Sumatra-Andaman (M w = 9.15) earthquake

Measuring seismicity in the Groningen Field. Bernard Dost, Elmer Ruigrok, Jesper Spetzler, Gert-Jan van den Hazel, Jordi Domingo

Rapid source characterization of the 2011 M w 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake

RELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE PHILIPPINE FAULT ZONE AND THEIR FAULT PLANES

Rupture process of the 2005 West Off Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan, earthquake

Source of the July 2006 West Java tsunami estimated from tide gauge records

The source process of the 2001 July 26 Skyros Island (Greece) earthquake

Analysis of Seismological and Tsunami Data from the 1993 Guam Earthquake

On May 4, 2001, central Arkansas experienced an M=4.4 earthquake followed by a

Slip distributions of the 1944 Tonankai and 1946 Nankai earthquakes including the horizontal movement effect on tsunami generation

Lab 6: Earthquake Focal Mechanisms (35 points)

The Kuril Islands Great Earthquake Sequence

Earthquake Source. Kazuki Koketsu. Special Session: Great East Japan (Tohoku) Earthquake. Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

Joint inversion of strong motion, teleseismic, geodetic, and tsunami datasets for the rupture process of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

Earthquake location at teleseismic distances from 3-component records (Tutorial with exercise by hand)

Short Note Source Mechanism and Rupture Directivity of the 18 May 2009 M W 4.6 Inglewood, California, Earthquake

27th Seismic Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies

29th Monitoring Research Review: Ground-Based Nuclear Explosion Monitoring Technologies ADVANCED WAVEFORM SIMULATION FOR SEISMIC MONITORING EVENTS

SOURCE PROCESS OF THE 2003 PUERTO PLATA EARTHQUAKE USING TELESEISMIC DATA AND STRONG GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

Characterization of Induced Seismicity in a Petroleum Reservoir: A Case Study

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Rapid magnitude determination from peak amplitudes at local stations

Supporting Online Material for

Rupture process of the 2007 Chuetsu-oki, Niigata, Japan, earthquake Waveform inversion using empirical Green s functions

RELOCATION OF LARGE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE SUMATRAN FAULT AND THEIR FAULT PLANES

Seismic Activity near the Sunda and Andaman Trenches in the Sumatra Subduction Zone

Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Slip for the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake

Precise location of the fault plane and the onset of the main rupture of the 2005 West Off Fukuoka Prefecture earthquake

Fault Length and Direction of Rupture Propagation for the 1993 Kushiro-Oki Earthquake as Derived from Strong Motion Duration

Coseismic slip distribution of the 2005 off Miyagi earthquake (M7.2) estimated by inversion of teleseismic and regional seismograms

Earthquake stress drop estimates: What are they telling us?

Source process of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake inferred from waveform inversion with long-period strong-motion records

25th Seismic Research Review - Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the Knowledge Base

Rapid Seismological Quantification of Source Parameters of the 25 April 2015 Nepal Earthquake

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 109, B08306, doi: /2004jb002980, 2004

Lesvos June 12, 2017, Mw 6.3 event, a quick study of the source

Supplementary Online Material for. Seismic evidence for a chemically distinct thermochemical reservoir in Earth s deep mantle beneath Hawaii

Dynamic source inversion for physical parameters controlling the 2017 Lesvos earthquake

Magnitude 8.2 FIJI. A magnitude 8.2 earthquake occurred km (226.7 mi) E of Suva, Fiji at a depth of km (350 miles).

Developing ENA GMPE s Using Broadband Synthe=c Seismograms from Finite- Fault Simula=ons

Imaging sharp lateral velocity gradients using scattered waves on dense arrays: faults and basin edges

High-Frequency Ground Motion Simulation Using a Source- and Site-Specific Empirical Green s Function Approach

Internal Layers of the Earth

The M7.1 May 26, 2003 off-shore Miyagi Prefecture Earthquake in northeast Japan: Source process and aftershock distribution of an intra-slab event

Moment tensor inversion of near source seismograms

Case Study 2: 2014 Iquique Sequence

Tokyo, Japan,

Arthur Frankel, William Stephenson, David Carver, Jack Odum, Robert Williams, and Susan Rhea U.S. Geological Survey

LETTER Earth Planets Space, 57, , 2005

Simulation of Strong Ground Motions for a Shallow Crustal Earthquake in Japan Based on the Pseudo Point-Source Model

7.1 FIJI 1, :57:22 UTC

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS FOR TSUNAMI FORECASTING AT PADANG CITY USING OFFSHORE TSUNAMI SENSORS

Imaging an asperity of the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake using a dense strong-motion seismograph network

COULOMB STRESS CHANGES DUE TO RECENT ACEH EARTHQUAKES

PEAT SEISMOLOGY Lecture 12: Earthquake source mechanisms and radiation patterns II

Earthquake Stress Drops in Southern California

Application of Phase Matched Filtering on Surface Waves for Regional Moment Tensor Analysis Andrea Chiang a and G. Eli Baker b

Calculation of Focal mechanism for Composite Microseismic Events

Ground motion and rupture process of the 2004 Mid Niigata Prefecture earthquake obtained from strong motion data of K-NET and KiK-net

The Mw 6.2 Leonidio, southern Greece earthquake of January 6, 2008: Preliminary identification of the fault plane.

EARTHQUAKE LOCATIONS INDICATE PLATE BOUNDARIES EARTHQUAKE MECHANISMS SHOW MOTION

Rupture Characteristics of Major and Great (M w 7.0) Megathrust Earthquakes from : 1. Source Parameter Scaling Relationships

Transcription:

doi:10.1038/nature11492 Figure S1 Short-period Seismic Energy Release Pattern Imaged by F-net. (a) Locations of broadband seismograph stations in Japanese F-net used for the 0.5-2.0 Hz P wave back-projection of the M w 8.7 and M w 8.2 Indo-Australia earthquakes. Stations were selected for high P wave similarity. (b) Local beam power maxima during the back-projections, with color indicating time after the nominal origin time. Symbol size is proportional to beam power. (c) Time integrated beam power for the M w 8.7 backprojection. The circles are early NEIC aftershocks with symbol size proportional to magnitude, and the dashed line is the Sumatra trench. The inset shows peak beam power as a function of time. (d) same as panel (c), but for the M w 8.2 aftershock. The timedependent evolution is best evaluated by viewing Movie S2. WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE 1

Figure S2 Long-period Seismic Energy Release Pattern. Maps showing the spatial patterns of long-period surface wave energy sources for the 11 April 2012 (M w 8.7) mainshock (epicenter indicated with a red outlined star) imaged using (a) R1 source time functions (STFs) only, (b) G1 STFs only, and (c) joint R1 and G1 STFs. Azimuthal weighting proportional to the R1 or G1 radiation patterns is used for each case to suppress instabilities near radiation nodes. 2 WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE

Figure S3 Time-varying Images of the Long-Period R1 and G1 Back-projection for the Mainshock. The back-projections of R1 and G1 source time functions (STFs) over the source region grid are shown for the indicated times, with the color image indicating locations of source radiation at long-period. The left column shows the images from just R1 STFs, the middle column shows the images from just G1 STFs, and the right column shows the images from joint R1+G1 imaging (as in Figure 3), where weighting proportional to radiation pattern coefficient has been applied. Linear stacking is used in each case. The secondary sources to the SW at 80s and to the west at 130 s have amplitudes about 20-30% of the peak near the hypocenter, consistent with seismic moment for M w 8.0-8.3 subevents. WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE 3

Figure S4 Long-period Seismic Energy Release Pattern for the M w 8.2 Aftershock. The maps show the spatial pattern of long-period surface wave energy release for the large aftershock on 11 April 2012 (M w 8.2) for which the red-outlined star indicates the epicenter, as imaged from (a) R1 source time functions (STFs) and (b) G1 STFs. The one-week aftershock distribution is shown by small circles with radii proportional to seismic magnitude. The color image indicates the peak stacked energy from the STFs back-projected relative to the epicentral location of the 10 January 2012 (M w 7.2) event (orange stars) which was used for empirical Green functions (EGFs). The star with black outline indicates the mainshock epicenter. The yellow circle in the images indicates a reference location of energy release that gives the move-out of R1 and G1 STF arrivals. The straight lines indicate the probable orientation of the fault that ruptured in the event. Panel (c) shows the azimuthally binned and stacked R1 (red) and G1 (blue) STFs plotted as functions of time relative to the EGF epicenter with a 100 s time shift from the aftershock origin time. These STFs represent seismic moment as a function of time observed in surface waves at different azimuths. The yellow curves correspond to the yellow circles in (a) and (b), showing the predicted arrival times of energy from that location, with the S-curve pattern caused by the relative propagation times toward different azimuths. The solid curve is for R1 waves using a velocity of 4.0 km/s and the dashed curve is for G1 waves using a velocity of 4.5 km/s. The STF signals aligned on such curves for each position in the map form the corresponding images in (a) and (b). 4 WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE

Figure S5a Observed and Predicted Broadband Waveforms for the 11 April 2012 M w 8.7 Mainshock. Broadband P wave ground displacement data filtered in the passband 1-200 s are shown with black lines. The station name, angular distance, Δ, and azimuth from the source, φ, are shown. Similarly filtered synthetics for the preferred fault model in Figure 4 are shown with red traces. Some traces are truncated to avoid contamination from PP arrivals. All of these traces are vertical component P waves. WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE 5

Figure S5b Observed and Predicted Broadband Waveforms for the 11 April 2012 M w 8.7 Mainshock. Broadband P wave ground displacement data filtered in the passband 1-200 s are shown with black lines. The station name, angular distance, Δ, and azimuth from the source, φ, are shown. Similarly filtered synthetics for the preferred fault model in Figure 4 are shown with red traces. Some traces are truncated to avoid contamination from PP arrivals. All of these traces are vertical component P waves. 6 WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE

Figure S5c Observed and Predicted Broadband Waveforms for the 11 April 2012 M w 8.7 Mainshock. Broadband ground displacement data filtered in the passband 1-200 s are shown with black (vertical component P waves) or blue (tangential component SH waves) lines. The station name, angular distance, Δ, and azimuth from the source, φ, are shown. Similarly filtered synthetics for the preferred fault model in Figure 4 are shown with red traces. Some traces are truncated to avoid contamination from PP or SS arrivals. WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE 7

Figure S5d Observed and Predicted Broadband Waveforms for the 11 April 2012 M w 8.7 Mainshock. Broadband surface wave STF data stacked in 10 azimuthal bins are shown with blue lines (R1 STFs) and black lines (G1 STFs). The central azimuths from the source for each stacking bin, φ, are shown. Corresponding synthetics for the preferred fault model in Figure 4 are shown with red traces. 8 WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE

Figure S6 Finite-Fault Inversion For Choice of NNE-SSW Fault on Ninetyeast Ridge. The map shows fault segments activated during the 11 April 2012 M w 8.7 mainshock, specified for finite-fault slip model inversion of teleseismic broadband P and SH waves and G1 and R1 STFs. In this case, we choose the NNE-SSW orientation for segment f, with rupture trending along the Ninetyeast ridge. The red star indicates the epicentral location, and red dots indicate the placement of hypocenters (all at 30 km deep) on each fault segment. The time at which each segment begins to rupture is indicated by T0.The rectangles indicate the subfault strikes and dips (shallow edge is on the green side, deeper edge on the black side. We use 4 subfaults, two of which are subdivided, with onset times constrained by the short-period back-projections. The corresponding slip distributions on each subfault are shown below, with the subfault grids having 20 km spacing along strike and 10 km spacing along dip. The peak slip and M w of each subfault is indicated, as is the position of the hypocenter on each subfault from which the rupture expands. The rupture velocity is 2.0 km/s on all subfaults. This solution can be compared with that in Figure 4. WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE 9

Figure S7 Point source moment tensor representations for the 8.7 event. The top solution is the direct sum of all subfault moment tensors from the model in Figure 4, with no allowance for space-time variations. The second solution is the sum allowing for phase delay. The lower two are actual data inversions by the Global CMT and W-phase methods. The fault model solution produces only minor non-double couple component, although a complete calculation with the spatial effects will increase it, possibly to the level of the observed solutions. 10 WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE

Movie S1 QuickTime (.mov) animations of short-period P wave back-projections for the 11 April 2012 M w 8.7 event using stations in Europe and Japan. The left panel is for European recordings filtered in the 0.5-2.0 Hz band. This corresponds to the information in Figure 2b,c. The middle panel is for the same European recordings filtered in the 0.1-0.5 Hz band. The right panel is for the F-net broadband recordings in Japan filtered in the 0.5-2.0 Hz band. The movie is also available at: http://es.ucsc.edu/~thorne/nature_sumatra/ylk_si_movies.html WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE 11

Movie S2 QuickTime (.mov) animations of short-period P wave back-projections for the 11 April 2012 M w 8.2 event using stations in Europe and Japan. The left panel is for European recordings filtered in the 0.5-2.0 Hz band. This corresponds to the information in Figure 2d. The middle panel is for the same European recordings filtered in the 0.1-0.5 Hz band. The right panel is for the F-net broadband recordings in Japan filtered in the 0.5-2.0 Hz band. The movie is also available at: http://es.ucsc.edu/~thorne/nature_sumatra/ylk_si_movies.html 12 WWW.NATURE.COM/NATURE