Some Results about the Classification of Totally Real Minimal Surfaces in S 5

Similar documents
A Characterization of Minimal Surfaces in the Lorentz Group L 3

ON HAMILTONIAN STATIONARY LAGRANGIAN SPHERES IN NON-EINSTEIN KÄHLER SURFACES

Lecture 20. The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem

On Einstein Nearly Kenmotsu Manifolds

Bubble Tree Convergence for the Harmonic Sequence of Harmonic Surfaces in CP n

Einstein H-umbilical submanifolds with parallel mean curvatures in complex space forms

Helicoidal Surfaces and Their Relationship to Bonnet Surfaces

TOTALLY REAL SURFACES IN THE COMPLEX 2-SPACE

The parallelism of shape operator related to the generalized Tanaka-Webster connection on real hypersurfaces in complex two-plane Grassmannians

Surfaces with Parallel Mean Curvature in S 3 R and H 3 R

GEOMETRY OF GEODESIC SPHERES IN A COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACE IN TERMS OF THEIR GEODESICS

Hamiltonian minimal Lagrangian spheres in the product of spheres

ON THE GAUSS CURVATURE OF COMPACT SURFACES IN HOMOGENEOUS 3-MANIFOLDS

The Gauss map and second fundamental form of surfaces in R 3

THE EXISTENCE PROBLEM

Jeong-Sik Kim, Yeong-Moo Song and Mukut Mani Tripathi

Contact pairs (bicontact manifolds)

Surfaces with zero mean curvature vector in 4-dimensional space forms

Legendre surfaces whose mean curvature vectors are eigenvectors of the Laplace operator

SOME ASPECTS ON CIRCLES AND HELICES IN A COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACE. Toshiaki Adachi* and Sadahiro Maeda

MEHMET AKIF AKYOL, LUIS M. FERNÁNDEZ, AND ALICIA PRIETO-MARTÍN

Stable minimal cones in R 8 and R 9 with constant scalar curvature

REAL HYPERSURFACES IN COMPLEX TWO-PLANE GRASSMANNIANS WHOSE SHAPE OPERATOR IS OF CODAZZI TYPE IN GENERALIZED TANAKA-WEBSTER CONNECTION

2. Determine the domain of the function. Verify your result with a graph. f(x) = 25 x 2

How circular are generalized circles

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Geometry for Physicists

Coordinate Finite Type Rotational Surfaces in Euclidean Spaces

Lagrangian H-Umbilical Surfaces in Complex Lorentzian Plane

Real hypersurfaces in a complex projective space with pseudo- D-parallel structure Jacobi operator

GAUSS CURVATURE OF GAUSSIAN IMAGE OF MINIMAL SURFACES

Minimal Surfaces. December 13, Alex Verzea. MATH 580: Partial Dierential Equations 1. Professor: Gantumur Tsogtgerel

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF HOMOGENEOUS 2-SPHERES IN COMPLEX GRASSMANNIANS. Fei, Jie; Jiao, Xiaoxiang; Xiao, Liang; Xu, Xiaowei

Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 40(3)

ON THE LOCAL VERSION OF THE CHERN CONJECTURE: CMC HYPERSURFACES WITH CONSTANT SCALAR CURVATURE IN S n+1

Minimal surfaces from self-stresses

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

1 First and second variational formulas for area

Taylor and Laurent Series

Real Hypersurfaces in Complex Two-Plane Grassmannians with Vanishing Lie Derivative

A CHARACTERIZATION OF WARPED PRODUCT PSEUDO-SLANT SUBMANIFOLDS IN NEARLY COSYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

ON KENMOTSU MANIFOLDS

K. A. Khan, V. A. Khan and Sirajuddin. Abstract. B.Y. Chen [4] showed that there exists no proper warped CRsubmanifolds

LAGRANGIAN HOMOLOGY CLASSES WITHOUT REGULAR MINIMIZERS

MATH DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Contents

ON THE SYMMETRY OF ANNULAR BRYANT SURFACE WITH CONSTANT CONTACT ANGLE. Sung-Ho Park

Bifurcation and symmetry breaking in geometric variational problems

Classical differential geometry of two-dimensional surfaces

AN INTEGRAL FORMULA IN KAHLER GEOMETRY WITH APPLICATIONS

Geometrical study of real hypersurfaces with differentials of structure tensor field in a Nonflat complex space form 1

Gauss Bonnet theorem for compact and orientable surfaces: a proof without using triangulations

Published as: J. Geom. Phys. 10 (1993)

THE BEST CONSTANT OF THE MOSER-TRUDINGER INEQUALITY ON S 2

Estimates in surfaces with positive constant Gauss curvature

ON SEMI-INVARIANT SUBMANIFOLDS OF A NEARLY KENMOTSU MANIFOLD WITH THE CANONICAL SEMI-SYMMETRIC SEMI-METRIC CONNECTION. Mobin Ahmad. 1.

Horo-tight immersions of S 1

338 Jin Suk Pak and Yang Jae Shin 2. Preliminaries Let M be a( + )-dimensional almost contact metric manifold with an almost contact metric structure

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

Euler Characteristic of Two-Dimensional Manifolds

An Inequality for Warped Product Semi-Invariant Submanifolds of a Normal Paracontact Metric Manifold

Spacelike surfaces with positive definite second fundamental form in 3-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds

HYPERSURFACES OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE AS GRADIENT RICCI SOLITONS *

ON TOTALLY REAL SUBMANIFOLDS IN A NEARLY KÄHLER MANIFOLD *

Practice Final Solutions

Geometric Modelling Summer 2016

Pseudoparallel Submanifolds of Kenmotsu Manifolds

Left Invariant CR Structures on S 3

SINGULAR CURVES OF AFFINE MAXIMAL MAPS

AFFINE SPHERES AND KÄHLER-EINSTEIN METRICS. metric makes sense under projective coordinate changes. See e.g. [10]. Form a cone (1) C = s>0

PSEUDOHOLOMORPHICITY OF CLOSED MINIMAL SURFACES IN CONSTANTLY CURVED 4-SPACES

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

More on the analogy between disclinations and cosmic strings

Complete Constant Mean Curvature surfaces in homogeneous spaces

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARIES

A NOTE ON FISCHER-MARSDEN S CONJECTURE

A local characterization for constant curvature metrics in 2-dimensional Lorentz manifolds

Part IB Geometry. Theorems. Based on lectures by A. G. Kovalev Notes taken by Dexter Chua. Lent 2016

LECTURE 6: PSEUDOSPHERICAL SURFACES AND BÄCKLUND S THEOREM. 1. Line congruences

Stratification of 3 3 Matrices

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 28 Jan 2015

SHEAR-FREE RAY CONGRUENCES ON CURVED SPACE-TIMES. Abstract

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

UNIQUENESS RESULTS ON SURFACES WITH BOUNDARY

Biconservative surfaces in Riemannian manifolds

Symplectic critical surfaces in Kähler surfaces

CONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP

The Calabi Conjecture

ON THE MEAN CURVATURE FUNCTION FOR COMPACT SURFACES

Helicoidal surfaces with J r = Ar in 3-dimensional Euclidean space

Non-Degenerate Quadric Surfaces in Euclidean 3-Space

Complex manifolds, Kahler metrics, differential and harmonic forms

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: General mixed Poisson regression models with varying dispersion

GENERALIZED WINTGEN INEQUALITY FOR BI-SLANT SUBMANIFOLDS IN LOCALLY CONFORMAL KAEHLER SPACE FORMS

On Null 2-Type Submanifolds of the Pseudo Euclidean Space E 5 t

RICCI CURVATURE OF SUBMANIFOLDS IN SASAKIAN SPACE FORMS

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

Transcription:

Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 2, 2007, no. 24, 1175-1181 Some Results about the Classification of Totally Real Minimal Surfaces in S 5 Rodrigo Ristow Montes Departamento de Matemática Universidade Federal da Paraíba BR 58.051-900 João Pessoa, P.B., Brazil ristow@mat.ufpb.br Abstract In this paper we prove that the Contact angle (π/4 β<π/2) for totally real compact minimal surfaces in the sphere S 5 with a parallel normal vector field must be constant. Mathematics Subject Classification: 53C42-53C40-53C21 Keywords: contact angle, holomorphic angle, minimal surfaces, parallel field, totally real surfaces. 1 Introduction In [4] we introduced the notion of contact angle, that can be considered as a new geometric invariant useful to investigate the geometry of immersed surfaces in S 3. Geometrically, the contact angle (β) is the complementary angle between the contact distribution and the tangent space of the surface. Also in [4], we deduced formulas for the Gaussian curvature and the Laplacian of an immersed minimal surface in S 3, and we gave a characterization of the Clifford Torus as the only minimal surface in S 3 with constant contact angle. We define α to be the angle given by cos α = ie 1,v, where e 1 and v are defined in section 2. The holomorphic angle α is the analogue of the Kähler angle introduced by Chern and Wolfson in [2]. Recently, in [5], we construct a family of minimal tori in S 5 with constant contact and holomorphic angle. These tori are parametrized by the following circle equation a 2 + ( b cos β ) 2 1 + sin 2 =2 β sin 4 β (1 + sin 2 β) 2, (1)

1176 Rodrigo Ristow Montes where a and b are given in Section 3 (equation (9)). In particular, when a =0 in (1), we recover the examples found by Kenmotsu, in [3]. These examples are defined for 0 <β< π. Also, when b = 0 in (1), we find a new family of 2 minimal tori in S 5, and these tori are defined for π <β< π. Also, in [5], when 4 2 β = π, we give an alternative proof of this classification of a Theorem from 2 Blair in [1], and Yamaguchi, Kon and Miyahara in [6] for Legendrian minimal surfaces in S 5 with constant Gaussian curvature. In this paper, we will classify totally real (see section 4) compact minimal surfaces in S 5 with a parallel normal vector field. We suppose that e 3 (in equation (3)) is a parallel normal vector field, and we get the following Theorem 1.1. The Contact angle (π/4 β<π/2) is constant for totally real compact minimal surfaces in S 5 with null principal curvatures a, b 2 Contact Angle for Immersed Surfaces in S 2n+1 Consider in C n+1 the following objects: the Hermitian product: (z, w) = n j=0 zj w j ; the inner product: z, w = Re(z,w); the unit sphere: S 2n+1 = { z C n+1 (z, z) =1 } ; the Reeb vector field in S 2n+1, given by: ξ(z) =iz; the contact distribution in S 2n+1, which is orthogonal to ξ: Δ z = { v T z S 2n+1 ξ,v =0 }. We observe that Δ is invariant by the complex structure of C n+1. Let now S be an immersed orientable surface in S 2n+1. Definition 2.1. The contact angle β is the complementary angle between the contact distribution Δ and the tangent space TS of the surface. Let (e 1,e 2 ) be a local frame of TS, where e 1 TS Δ. Then cos β = ξ,e 2. Finally, let v be the unit vector in the direction of the orthogonal projection of e 2 on Δ, defined by the following relation e 2 = sin βv + cos βξ. (2)

Totally real minimal surfaces in S 5 1177 3 Equations for Gaussian curvature and Laplacian of a minimal surface in S 5 In this section, we deduce the equations for the Gaussian curvature and for the Laplacian of a minimal surface in S 5 in terms of the contact angle and the holomorphic angle. Consider the normal vector fields e 3 = i csc αe 1 cot αv e 4 = cot αe 1 + i csc αv (3) e 5 = csc βξ cot βe 2 where β 0,π and α 0,π. We will call (e j ) 1 j 5 an adapted frame. Using (2) and (3), we get v = sin βe 2 cos βe 5, iv = sin αe 4 cos αe 1 (4) ξ = cos βe 2 + sin βe 5 It follows from (3) and (4) that ie 1 = cos α sin βe 2 + sin αe 3 cos α cos βe 5 (5) ie 2 = cos βz cos α sin βe 1 + sin α sin βe 4 Consider now the dual basis (θ j )of(e j ). The connection forms (θ j k ) are given by De j = θ k j e k, and the second fundamental form with respect to this frame are given by II j = θ j 1θ 1 + θ j 2θ 2 ; j =3,..., 5. Using (5) and differentiating v and ξ on the surface S, we get Dξ = cos α sin βθ 2 e 1 + cos α sin βθ 1 e 2 + sin αθ 1 e 3 + sin α sin βθ 2 e 4 cos α cos βθ 1 e 5, (6) Dv = (sin βθ2 1 cos βθ1 5 )e 1 + cos β(dβ θ5 2 )e 2 + (sin βθ2 3 cos βθ3 5 )e 3 +(sin βθ4 2 cos βθ5)e 4 4 + sin β(dβ + θ2)e 5 5.

1178 Rodrigo Ristow Montes Differentiating e 3, e 4 and e 5, we have θ3 1 = θ1 3 θ3 2 = sin β(dα + θ4) 1 cos β sin αθ 1 θ3 4 = csc βθ1 2 cot α(θ3 1 + csc βθ4 2 ) θ3 5 = cot βθ2 3 csc β sin αθ1 θ4 1 = dα csc βθ2 3 + sin α cot βθ1 θ4 2 = θ2 4 θ4 3 = csc βθ2 1 + cot α(θ3 1 + csc βθ4 2 ) θ4 5 = cot βθ2 4 sin αθ2 θ5 1 = cos αθ 2 cot βθ2 1 θ5 2 = dβ + cos αθ 1 (7) θ5 3 = cot βθ2 3 + csc β sin αθ1 θ5 4 = cot βθ2 4 + sin αθ 2 The conditions of minimality and of symmetry are equivalent to the following equations: On the surface S, we consider It follows from (8) that θ λ 1 θ 1 + θ λ 2 θ 2 =0=θ λ 1 θ 2 θ λ 2 θ 1. (8) θ 3 1 = aθ 1 + bθ 2 θ 3 2 = bθ 1 aθ 2 θ 3 1 = aθ 1 + bθ 2 θ 4 1 = dα +(b csc β sin α cot β)θ 1 a csc βθ 2 θ2 4 = dα J a csc βθ 1 (b csc β sin α cot β)θ 2 (9) θ1 5 = dβ J cos αθ 2 θ 5 2 = dβ cos αθ 1 where J is the complex structure of S is given by Je 1 = e 2 and Je 2 = e 1. Moreover, the normal connection forms are given by: θ 4 3 = sec βdβ J cot α csc βdα J + a cot α cot 2 βθ 1 +(b cot α cot 2 β cos α cot β csc β + 2 sec β cos α)θ 2 θ3 5 = (b cot β csc β sin α)θ 1 a cot βθ 2 (10) θ4 5 = cot β(dα J) a cot β csc βθ 1 +( bcsc β cot β + sin α(cot 2 β 1))θ 2,

Totally real minimal surfaces in S 5 1179 while the Gauss equation is equivalent to the equation: Therefore, using equations (9) and (11), we have dθ 1 2 + θ1 k θk 2 = θ 1 θ 2. (11) K = 1 β 2 2 cos αβ 1 cos 2 α (1 + csc 2 β)(a 2 + b 2 ) +2b sin α csc β cot β + 2 sin α cot βα 1 α 2 +2a csc βα 2 2b csc βα 1 sin 2 α cot 2 β =1 (1 + csc 2 β)(a 2 + b 2 ) 2b csc β(α 1 sin α cot β)+2acsc βα 2 β + cos αe 1 2 α sin α cot βe 1 2 (12) Using (7) and the complex structure of S, we get Differentiating (13), we conclude that θ 1 2 = tan β(dβ J 2 cos αθ 2 ) (13) dθ2 1 = ( (1 + tan 2 β) β 2 tan βδβ 2 cos α(1 + 2 tan 2 β)β 1 +2 tan β sin αα 1 4 tan 2 β cos 2 α)θ 1 θ 2 where Δ = tr 2 is the Laplacian of S. The Gaussian curvature is therefore given by: K = (1 + tan 2 β) β 2 tan βδβ 2 cos α(1 + 2 tan 2 β)β 1 +2 tan β sin αα 1 4 tan 2 β cos 2 α. (14) From (12) and (14), we obtain the following formula for the Laplacian of S: tan βδβ = (1 + csc 2 β)(a 2 + b 2 )+2bcsc β(α 1 sin α cot β) 2a csc βα 2 tan 2 β( β + 2 cos αe 1 2 cot β α + sin α(1 cot 2 β)e 1 2 ) + sin 2 α(1 tan 2 β) (15) 4 Gauss-Codazzi-Ricci equations for totally real minimal surfaces in S 5 with null principal curvatures Definition 4.1. We define a totally real minimal surface as a minimal surface in S 5 with Holomorphic angle α = π/2.

1180 Rodrigo Ristow Montes Using the connection form (9),(10) and (13) with α = π/2 and a, b nulls, we have Now Codazzi-Ricci equations: simplify to: Therefore: θ 3 1 =0= θ 3 2 θ 4 1 = cot βθ 1 θ 4 2 = cot βθ 2 θ 5 1 = β 2 θ 1 β 1 θ 2 θ 5 2 = β 1 θ 1 β 2 θ 2 θ1 5 = β 2 θ 1 β 1 θ 2 (16) θ3 4 = sec β(β 2 θ 1 β 1 θ 2 ) θ3 5 = csc βθ 1 θ 5 4 = β 2 θ 1 β 1 θ 2 θ 1 2 = tan β(β 2 θ 1 β 1 θ 2 ) dθ1 3 + θ3 2 θ2 1 + θ3 4 θ4 1 + θ3 5 θ5 1 = 0 dθ2 4 + θ4 1 θ1 2 + θ4 3 θ3 2 + θ4 5 θ5 2 = 0 dθ4 5 + θ1 5 θ4 1 + θ2 5 θ4 2 + θ3 5 θ4 3 = 0 2 csc ββ 1 = 0 (17) β 1 = 0 (18) The following Codazzi-Ricci equations are always verified: dθ2 3 + θ1 3 θ2 1 + θ4 3 θ2 4 + θ5 3 θ2 5 = 0 dθ1 4 + θ4 2 θ2 1 + θ4 3 θ3 1 + θ4 5 θ5 1 = 0 dθ3 5 + θ5 1 θ1 3 + θ5 2 θ2 3 + θ5 4 θ4 3 = 0 dθ2 5 + θ1 5 θ2 1 + θ3 5 θ2 3 + θ4 5 θ2 4 = 0 Remark 4.2. The Contact angle(β) is determined just only in direction of e 1, and it is constant function in this direction. Gauss-Codazzi-Ricci equations: dθ1 2 + θ2 3 θ3 1 + θ2 4 θ4 1 + θ2 5 θ5 1 = θ 2 θ 1 dθ1 5 + θ5 2 θ2 1 + θ5 3 θ3 1 + θ5 4 θ4 1 = 0 dθ3 4 + θ1 4 θ3 1 + θ2 4 θ3 2 + θ5 4 θ3 5 = 0 give the following Laplacian equation of the Contact angle (β): tan βδ(β) = tan 2 β β 2 + cot 2 β 1 (19)

Totally real minimal surfaces in S 5 1181 5 Proof of the Theorem 1.1 In this section, we will give a prove of the theorem, using Gauss-Codazzi-Ricci equations for a compact minimal surface in S 5 with constant holomorphic angle (α = π/2) and null principal curvatures a, b. Now suppose that (π/4 β<π/2 ) at the equation (19), then Δβ <0 and using the Hopf s Lemma, we get the Theorem (1.1). References [1] D. Blair: Contact Manifolds in Riemannian Geometry, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 509, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer 1976. [2] S.S. Chern and J.G. Wolfson: Minimal surfaces by moving frames, American J. Math. 105 (1983), 59-83. [3] K. Kenmotsu: On a parametrization of minimal immersions R 2 into S 5,Tohoku Math. J. 27 (1975), 83-90. [4] R.R. Montes and J.A. Verderesi: A new characterization of the Clifford Torus, Report Ime-Usp, july 2002. [5] R.R. Montes and J.A. Verderesi: Contact Angle for Immersed Surfaces in S 2n+1, Differential Geometry and its Applications, 25 (2007), 92-100. [6] S. Yamaguchi; M. Kon; Y. Miyahara: A theorem on C-totally real minimal surface, Proc. American Math. Soc. 54 (1976), 276-280. Received: April 6, 2007