Portable, Low-cost Proportional Counters for Space, Atmospheric and Ground based Applications E. R. Benton 1, A. C. Lucas 1, O. I. Causey 1, S. Kodaira 2 and H. Kitamura 2 1 E. V. Benton Radiation Physics Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, USA 2 National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan 22 nd Workshop on Radiation Monitoring for the ISS 5-7 September 2017, Torino, Italy
Operation of a Proportional Counter amplifer & spectrometer chamber filled gas at known pressure preamp High Voltage Power Supply charged particle enters chamber, collides (ionizes) electrons of fill gas free electrons accelerated toward anode wire, collide with more electrons creating electron avalanche, collected by anode wire. Anode Wire at High Voltage conductive walls of chamber held at ground
ATED Detector Head
Active Tissue Equivalent Dosimeter Scientific Objectives Continuously measure the Linear Energy Transfer (LET) spectra, absorbed dose and dose equivalent as functions of time with ~1 second resolution for a total duration of 6 months. Demonstrate the operational capability of the Active Tissue Equivalent Dosimeter Correlate time resolved data with ISS orbital position, altitude and orientation. Determine average dose and dose equivalent rates from galactic cosmic rays, trapped protons in the South Atlantic Anomaly, and trapped electrons at high latitudes. Compare results with measurements made using other radiation detectors deployed throughout ISS (IV-TEPC, REMs, RAMs, Liulin-4, etc.). Compare results with model calculations (HZETRN/OLTARIS). Analyze operational performance of instrument and identify problems and lessons learned for improvement in next generation.
Active Tissue Equivalent Dosimeter Physical Specifications Dimensions: 25.5 cm 15.8 cm 13.0 cm Mass: 3.25 kg (2.25 kg w/o power cable) Power: <10 Watts Power Source: 120 Vac from ISS inverter Maximum internal voltage: +900 Vdc Operational Period: Continuous for 6 months, with short interruption for sample data download to ground via ISS laptop Data: 32 Gbyte SDRAM card, compatible with ISS laptop
Active Tissue Equivalent Dosimeter Flight Unit CPU & Data Storage Spectrometer Detector head lid w/connectors Detector Head Pulse Shaping Amplifier Module Not Shown: HPVS, Power connector & cable, internal wiring and mounting hardware Power Supply
Active Tissue Equivalent Dosimeter Flight Unit Spectrometer CPU & Data Storage High Voltage Power Supply AC to DC Power Supplies Pulse Shaping Amplifier Module
ATED Block Diagram Symbol indicates ground
ATED Power Distribution Diagram 9
November 2017: Handover ATED flight unit to NASA January 2018: Launch to ISS on SpaceX-14 Delivery to ISS ATED Deployment Active Tissue Equivalent Detector Experiment Chronology remove ATED from soft stowage and transfer to ISS Node 3 placement of ATED in aisle in Node 3 near IV-TEPC connect ATED to ISS power, 120 Vac via ISS AC power inverter switch on ATED Continuous Operation for 1 month intervals Transfer sample data at 1 month intervals switch off ATED remove SDRAM card and insert in ISS laptop transfer selected data files to ISS laptop then transmit to ground remove SDRAM card for ISS laptop and insert in ATED switch on ATED
Active Tissue Equivalent Detector Experiment Chronology (cont.) End of Experiment after 6 months deployment and transfer of ATED to SRAG switch off ATED remove SDRAM card and place in soft stowage for return to ground. insert new SDRAM card in ATED transfer ownership of ATED to SRAG
Deployment near SRAG IV-TEPC in Node 3 The Active Tissue Equivalent Detector will be deployed in Node 3 near the IV-TEPC. Images courtesy of Kerry Lee, NASA SRAG
ATED Hardware Update In June 2017, ATED flight unit was tested in heavy ion beams at the HIMAC heavy ion accelerator in Chiba Japan: 150 MeV/n He, 250 MeV/n C, 490 MeV/n Si, 500 MeV/n Fe, Beams represent important components of space radiation environment in LEO. Calibration of ATED as function of lineal energy ATED EMI testing carried out at JSC, 26 June 2017 ATED electrical compatibility testing carried out at JSC, 27 June 2017
ATED during HIMAC Testing/Calibration 14
Lineal Energy Fluence Spectrum from HIMAC Exposures 1.2 y * D(y) (Normalized) 1.0 500 MeV Fe 490 MeV Si 150 MeV He 490 MeV C 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 100 101 102 y (kev/ m) 103
Proportional Counters for use aboard Aircraft Access to the atmosphere, especially aviation altitudes, is orders of magnitude cheaper and more common that axis to space Dosimetric data available from space is far more abundant and of better quality than dosimetric data from aircraft Debate about the risks for ionizing radiation exposure to aircrew and frequent flyers, as well as to avionics, remains controversial and has not been adequately addressed...in part due to a lack of systematic, high quality measurements Planning to flight test current version on NASA DC-8, UAVs, and other aircraft starting in March 2018. Target markets: Commercial jetliners, business jets (routinely fly at higher altitudes than commercial jetliners), high altitude balloon missions.
Neutron Field/Aviation Applications Proportional Counter with Aluminum and Higher Z Ionization Cavities
Normalized Count and Dose Spectra from Tissue Equivalent and Aluminum Proportional Counters exposed at LANSCE 80000 70000 60000 50000 Millions 120 100 80 N(h) 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 0.1 10 1000 kev/micron in tissue N(h)*h 60 40 20 0 0.1 10 1000 kev/micron in tissue AL counts Acrylic x 0.012 AL Dose X62 Acrylic Dose Greater number of counts in Acrylic vs. Al cavities Higher LET in Al vs. Acrylic cavities
TEPCs for use in Proton and Carbon Beam Therapy Proton and Carbon Radiotherapy beams possess higher LET and RBE than do x-ray and electron radiotherapy beams...yet ionization chambers are still used in calibration for all of them. Microdosimeters such as Tissue Equivalent Proportional Counters are an alternative that provides LET and thus RBE information in addition to absorbed dose.
Conclusions and Future Work Using acrylic ionization cavity since more practical than A-150 tissue equivalent plastic Initial application will likely be in aviation/air crew monitoring lighter weight (semi-permanent pressurization) lower power ARM microcontroller-based spectrometer Continuing development optimized for neutron monitoring multiple ionization cavities of different Z materials charged particle/neutron discrimination by surrounding cavity with anticoincidence plastic scintillator layers Developing parallel plate/end-on cylindrical version for use in proton and heavy ion cancer therapy applications Make available commercially at reasonable cost
Thank you for your Attention
TEPC Response to Energetic Protons 1.2 0.8 0.6 1.2 0.4 87 MeV protons 0.2 0.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 y (kev/ m) 1.2 y D(y) (normalized units) 162 MeV protons 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.01 0.8 0.1 1 y (kev/ m) 0.6 A-150 Nylon Acrylic Polystyrene Polyethylene 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.01 y D(y) (normalized units) y D(y) (normalized units) 222 MeV protons 1.0 0.1 1 y (kev/ m) 10 100 10 100
Exposures of Polystyrene STEPC to 490 MeV/n 28 Si beams at HIMAC: Raw, Lineal Energy (Y), and LET Spectra 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 490 MeV/n Si, HIMAC 6/2011, Polystyrene STEPC counts Y LET Arbitrary Units 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 50 100 150 (kev/µm)
Average Lineal Energy 1.2 1.0 H He C Si Ar Fe Frequency Averaged Lineal Energy y D(y) (normalized units) 0.8 0.6 0.4 y F = 0 y f ( y) dy y F = Dose Averaged y= y max y= 0 y= y max y= 0 y f ( y) f ( y) 0.2 Lineal Energy 0.0 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 222 MeV Protons 162 MeV Protons 87 MeV Protons Helium Carbon Silicon Argon Iron y (kev/ m) y D = 1 y F 0 y 2 f ( y) dy y D = y= y max y= 0 y= y max y= 0 y 2 f ( y) y f ( y)
y d (kev/µm) 300 250 200 150 100 Dose Averaged Lineal Energies Theoretical A-150 Experiment Nylon Experiment Acrylic Experiment Polystyrene Experiment Polyethylene Experiment Average of Plastics Simulation ICRU Muscle Simulation Si Ar Fe 50 0 H He C 0.1 1 10 100 1000 LET (kev/µm) No appreciable difference between different plastics and tissue Collums et al., NIM B 333 69-72.