Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION KEK-TH-67,YITP-3-95 arxiv:30.36v3 hep-th] 8 Apr 04 Direct derivation of mirror partition function Masazumi Honda High Energy Accelerator Research Organization KEK), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-080, Japan, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa Oiwakecho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-850, Japan mhonda@post.kek.jp Abstract: We study the partition function of the three-dimensional N = 6 UN) k UN +M) k superconformal Chern-Simons matter theory known as the theory. We prove that the partition function on S 3 is exactly the same as a formula recently proposed by Awata, Hirano and Shigemori. While this formula was previously obtained by an analytic continuation from the L, ) lens space matrix model, we directly derive this by using a generalization of the Cauchy determinant identity. We also give an interpretation for the formula from brane picture. Keywords: Matrix Models, M-Theory, Supersymmetry and Duality.
Contents. Introduction. Proof 3. For M k + 5. For M k 7 3. Discussion 8. Introduction Recently there has been significant progress in understanding low-energy effective theories of multiple M-branes. The simplest case of such theories is the so-called M theory ], which is the 3d N = 6 supersymmetricchern-simons matter theory CSM) with the gauge group UN) k UN) k. The authors in ] discussed that this theory describes N M- braneson C 4 /Z k in thelow-energy limit. Furthermoreit has beenshownbythelocalization method, 3] see also 4]) that a class of supersymmetric observables in N = theory on S 3 have representations in terms of certain matrix integrals. Thanks to the localization technique, several works have extensively studied the partition function and BPS Wilson loops in the M theory on S 3 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0,,, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Especially a breakthrough was caused by a seminal paper 0], which rewrites the M partition function as an ideal Fermi gas system see also 9, 7, 9, 0]). Based on this formalism, recent studies have revealed structures of the partition function 5] and half-bps Wilson loop 7] including worldsheet and membrane D-brane) instanton effects, 8]. In this paper we study the N = 6 CSM with more general gauge group UN) k UN+ M) k known as the theory ]. This theory has been expected to arise when we have N M-branes on C 4 /Z k, together with M fractional M-branes sitting at the singularity. The authors in ] also argued that the theory has good approximations by the d SUGRA on AdS 4 S 7 /Z k with discrete torsion for N /5 k, and the type IIA SUGRA on AdS 4 CP 3 withnontrivial B-fieldholonomy forn /5 k N, respectively. Furthermore the recent works 3] have also conjectured that the theory is dual to N = 6 parityviolating Vasiliev theory on AdS 4 with a UN) gauge symmetry when M,k with M/k and N kept fixed. Thus it is worth studying the theory in detail. Here we study the partition function of the UN) k UN +M) k theory on S 3. By using the localization method, the partition function is given by 3] k) = i N ) )signk) N +M)!N! d µ d N ν π) π) ik e 4π j= µ j N a= ν a) N
j<l sinh µ j µ l a<b N sinh νa ν ] b N j= b= cosh µ j ν b..) For M 0, this representation is not suitable for the Fermi gas approach since the Cauchy identity is not helpful in contrast to the M case 0]. Nevertheless, Awata, Hirano and Shigemori AHS) recently proposed 4] that the partition function is equivalent to where AHS k) = i N +) )signk)+n+ M ) N N ) i πη i πη N k / N! d N s N πi) N sin sa a= q sa π + ) M q sa π + ) M n q = e πi k, a)n = aq m ), G z+;q) = q) z z ) m=0 q) MM ) G M +;q) m= a<b N q s b sa π ),.) +q s b sa π ) q z+m) ] m q m q m ) z. Here η specifies the integral contour. The authors in 4] have determined η for N = as { 0 + for k η = M 0 k +M +0 + for k,.3) M 0 to be consistent with the Seiberg-like duality ] but not for general N. One expects that the AHS formula.) gives a generalization of the mirror description of the M partition function. One of the strongest evidence is that Z AHS M=0,k= is the same as the partition function of the N = 4 super QCD with one adjoint and fundamental hypermultiplets 9] related through 3d mirror symmetry 5, 6, ]. There is also an interpretation for general k from the S-dual brane construction 7, 8]. The AHS representation also has several advantages. First, this is suitable for the Fermi gas approach and Tracy-Widom theorem 9], which reduces the grand canonical analysis to Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz-like equation. Second, it is easier to perform Monte Carlo simulation as in the M case ] than the original formula.). Finally, the AHS formula highly simplifies analysis in the Vasiliev limit. Despite of the advantages, the AHS proposal is still conjecture in the following senses: The derivation of Z AHS started with an analytic continuation 5] from the partition function of the L, ) lens space matrix model 30]. The analytic continuation has not been rigorously justified in spite of much strong evidence 5, 8,, 5, 3]. WhilewecanrepresentthepartitionfunctionoftheL,) matrixmodelintermsofa convergent series, its analytic continuation to the theory yields a non-convergent series. The AHS formula corresponds to its well-defined integral representation and reproduces the series order by order in the perturbative expansion by πi/k although there would be non-perturbative ambiguity generically. In this paper we prove the AHS conjecture Z = Z AHS and determine the integral contour for arbitrary parameters as discussed in section. It will turn out that the choice.3) of η is still correct even for general N. Section 3 is devoted to discussion.
. Proof In this section we prove Z = Z AHS. Let us start with the localization formula.). For M = 0, the Cauchy determinant identity is quite useful to derive its mirror description 9, 9, 0], but not for M 0. Here instead we use a generalization of the Cauchy identity corresponding to Lemma. of 3]) : j<l x j x l ) a<b y a y b ) j,b x j y b ) = ) N N ) x M x M x y x y x y N x M x M x y x y x y N. x M xm.... x y... x y x y N,.) where j,l,a and b run j,l N +M, a,b N. One of easiest way to prove this identity is to use Boson-Fermion correspondence in d CFT. More concretely, the left-hand side corresponds to a correlation function on P of a bc system in Boson representation: M bx ) bx )cy N ) cy ) 0,.) where we have identified as b : e ϕ : and c : e ϕ : by using a free boson satisfying ϕz) = q +a 0 logz n 0 a n n z n, a m, q] = δ m,0, a m,a n ] = mδ m+n,0, a n 0 0 = 0, 0 q = 0 a n<0 = 0, 0 0 =, M = e M q 0,.3) while theright-hand sideis theone in Fermion representation with identifications: b ψ and c ψ in terms of charged fermions satisfying ψz) = ψ n z n, ψz) = ψ n z n, n Z+/ n Z+/ { ψ m, ψ n } = {ψ m,ψ n } = 0, { ψ m,ψ n } = δ m+n,0, ψ n>0 0 = ψ n>0 0 = 0, 0 ψ n<0 = 0 ψ n<0 = 0, M = ψ M+ If we take x j = e µ j and y a = e νa in the determinant identity.), then we find j<l sinh µ j µ l a<b sinh νa ν b j,b cosh µ l ν b = j= e M µ j N e M νa det a= θ N,l cosh µ j ν l ψ 0..4) +e + j)µ j θ l,n+ ),.5) We thank Sanefumi Moriyama to tell us about this identity and suggest that the identity would be useful for analyzing the matrix model.). He showed us a different proof for the identity in April 0. In the meanwhile, we remembered the identity when we read a Japanese) textbook on conformal field theory written by Yasuhiko Yamada. Therefore we are also grateful to Yasuhiko Yamada. 3
where θ j,l = { for j l 0 for j < l..6) Plugging this into.), we find k) = N N! l=n+ ) σ σ e + l)µ l d µ d N ν π) π) N j= θ N,j j= cosh µ σj) ν j e ik 4π µ j Mµ j N a= e ik 4π ν a +Mνa cosh µa νa +e + j)µ σj) θ j,n+ ), where N = i N ) )signk)..7) Making a Fourier transformation cosh p = π dx e i π px coshx,.8) and introducing auxiliary variables y N+,,y constrained by y l = π N +M + ) i l with l = N +,,N +M,.9) the partition function becomes Z = N N! N a= l=n+ ) σ σ d N x π N d y π d µ π) d N ν π) N e ik 4π ν a+mν a+ i π xaµa νa)+ i π y σa)µ a y aν a) πδ coshx a coshy a j= e ik 4π µ j Mµ j y l π i N +M +/ l) ) e + l)µ l+ i π y σl)µ l ]..0) Here we used j= y j µ σj) = j= y σ j)µ j and redefined the permutation symbol as σ σ. Performing the Fresnel integrals over µ i and ν a allows us to find e imπ 4 signk) N Z = ) σ N! k σ l=n+ πe iπ k N+ l) δ d N xd y π N π N e i kπ xaya y σa))+ k Mya y σa)) coshx a= a coshy a ] y l π )e i N +M +/ l) i kπ y l + kn+ l)y σl)..) Note that the integration over x a is convergent only for kπ Imy a y σa) ). Since y σa) would be iπm /) depending on the permutation, the integration is always The saturated case kπ Imya y σa)) = is understood as a limit from kπ Imya y σa)) <. 4
safe for M k +. On the other hand, a part of the integrations is divergent for M > k +. However, these divergences must be apparent and cancel out after summing over the permutation since this case is equivalent to the safe case through the Seiberg-like duality ] between the theories with gauge groups UN) k UN +M) k and UN + k M) k UN) k,.) which has been proven for the S 3 partition functions 33, 34]. Although we could regularize the divergences, instead we will adopt another way as discussed in sec.... For M k + We can continue our computation straightforwardly for this case. Integrating over x a leads us to k) = e imπ 4 signk) N ) σ N! k σ l=n+ πe iπ k N+ l) δ d y π N e k Mya y σa)) a= cosh ya y σa) k coshy a ] y l π )e i N +M +/ l) i kπ y l + kn+ l)y σl) Noting a y a y σa) ) = l=n+ y l y σl) ) and rescaling y a as y a y a /, one finds e imπ 4 signk) N Z = N! k l=n+ det πe iπ k N+ l) δ θ N,l cosh y j y l k d y π) N a= cosh ya yl π i N +M +/ l) ) e i 4kπ y l M k y l +e k +/ l)y j θ l,n+ )..3) If we use the identity.5) again and integrate over y N+,,y, then we obtain k) i signk) N +) ) ) N N )+M M )+NM i = N! N k d N y π) N a<b Taking account of l<m M tanh x a x b k tanh y a y b k isin πl m) k = N a= ixb xa) q π +q ix b xa) π cosh ya M l=0 q M M ) l<m M tanh y a +πil +/) k ] isin ]. πl m) ] k..4) ] = ) M M ) q M M ) q) M M ) G M +;q),, M l=0 tanh x j +πil +/) k ixa M q π + ) M = ), q ixa π + ) M 5
and making a transformation s a = iy a π, the partition function takes the form of Z = i N +) )signk)+n+ M ) NN ) N k / N! i πη d N s N q sa π + ) M i πη πi) N sin sa q sa π + ) M a= q) MM ) G M +;q) a<b N q s b sa π ) +q s b sa π )..5) Although η is naively η = /, we can change η in a range 0 < η < by the Cauchy integration theorem. If we take η = 0 + for M k and η = + 0 + for M = k +, then this is nothing but the AHS formula for M k and M = k + as a special case of M k ), respectively. Note that the choice.3) of η is still correct for general N. For alater convenience, we introducetheum) k purechern-simonspartition function without level shift) on S 3 as 30, 35] Z M) CS k) = i signk)m = k M M i M l= k M q M M ) q) M M ) G M +;q) sin πl ) M l..6) k In terms of this, the partition function can be rewritten as Remark Z = i signk)nn ) ) N N ) N! N k N q M M ) Z M) CS k) i πη i πη d N s πi) N N a= sin sa M l= We can also express the partition function as k) = e imπ 4 signk) q M M ) N N! k N a= cosh ya l=n+ πδ tan s+lπ k d y π) a<b N q s b sa π ) j<l sinh y j y l +q s b sa π )..7) k j,b cosh y j y b k a<b sinh ya y b k y l π i N +M +/ l) ) ]..8) Each factor in this integrand has an interpretation from the brane picture. Recall that the type IIB brane construction for the UN) k UN +M) k theory consists of N circular D3-branes,, k)5-brane, NS5-brane and M D3-branes suspended between the two 5-branes ]. Taking S-transformation, the, k)5-brane and NS5-brane become k, )5-brane and D5-brane, respectively. First, note that the second factor N a= cosh ya agrees with the contribution from a bi-fundamental hypermultiplet 3]. This multiplet comes from strings ending on the D5-brane and D3-branes. Next, the first factor j<l sinh y j y l k a<b N sinh ya y b k N! k N j= b= cosh y j y b.9) k 6
is a bit nontrivial. For M = 0, the authors in 7] argued that this factor comes from a system of the, k)5-brane and D3-branes see also 8]). Hence we can interpret.9) as natural generalization of this contribution. Finally, the last factor l=n+ δ y l πi ) N +M +/ l) reflects a fact that the M suspended D3-branes are locked into position by the two 5-branes.. For M k The integration.) is apparently divergent for this case. Instead of imposing some regularizations, we use the Seiberg-like duality.) for the theory ]. Note that this duality has been already proven for the S 3 partition functions because the duality comes 34] from the Giveon-Kutasov duality 36] proven in 33]. Since the dual partition k) in terms of Z N+ k M,N) k) through the duality. Let us show Z = Z AHS for 3 M k. Via the Seiberg-like duality.) as mathematical identity, the partition function is given by function is given by.7) for M k, we can express k) = ) )+ N+ k M N+ k M ) i N ) N+ k M) )signk) e πi k +6N k 6 k +)signk) Z N,N+ k M) k)..0) Here the phase factor has been determined 4 in 34]. Plugging.7) into this leads us to k) = i signk)nn ) ) N N ) N! N k N q M M ) Z k M) CS k) i 0+ i 0 + d N s πi) N N a= sin sa k M l= tan s+lπ k a<b N q s b sa π ). +q s b sa π ) By using the level-rank duality 5 for the pure CS theory: Z k M) CS k) = Z M) CS k) and eq. E.) in 4]: M sin s tan s+πl = M k sin s tan s+πl,.) k we obtain l= k) = i l= N +) )signk)+n+ M ) NN ) N k / N! s s+π k +M ),M k M q) MM ) G M +;q) 3 For M = k and M = k +, we can also apply the argument in sec... We set the condition M k such that the dual partition function is given by.7). 4 Note that our normalization for the partition function differs from the original paper 34] by k) = ) N 5 See e.g. appendix. B of 34] for a proof. Z ours N,) N )+ ) N KWY k). 7
where i πη i πη d N s πi) N N a= sin sa q sa π + ) M q sa π + ) M a<b N q s b sa π ),.) +q s b sa π ) η = k +M +0 +..3) For M k, this exactly agrees with Z AHS. For M = k, we can show that making a transformation s a s a with a choice η = 0 and using the periodicity of the integrand: s a s a + 4kπi give the AHS formula. Thus we find again that the choice.3) of the integral contour is valid for general N. Remark As already discussed in 4], the partition function vanishes for M > k since the pure CS partition function in the prefactors vanishes for this case. This manifests an expectation that the supersymmetries are spontaneously broken in this case, 37] see also 38]). 3. Discussion In this paper we have proven that the partition function on S 3 is exactly the same as the formula.) recently proposed by Awata, Hirano and Shigemori 4], which can be interpreted as the mirror description of the partition function. It has also turned out that the choice.3) of the integral contour, previously determined only for N =, is still correct for general N. Our proof heavily relied on the determinant identity.) and the following illuminating structure: Z ] e d µd N ν M be µ ) be µ )c e ν N ) c e ν ) 0 4π ik i µ i a ν a), 3.) which might be reminiscent of the AGT relation 39]. This would imply that somehow the Boson-Fermion correspondence knows how to simplify the partition function on S 3. One can see similar structure also in general N = 3 quiver CSM. It is interesting if we find any physical origin of this structure. A recent work 40] in three dimensions and topological string perspective 4] might provide valuable insights along this direction. For M > k +, we have to change the integral contour. We can also express the partition function for this case as Z M> k + l=n+ d y πδ j<l sinh y j y l k a<b sinh ya y b k j,b cosh y j y b cosh ya k a= y l π ) ] i N +M +/ l). ) ya ya+πi k +M The similar representation.8) was useful to find the brane interpretation for M k +. Formally this shift is similar to anomalous R-charge, imaginary mass and voertex N 8
loop 3]. It would be intriguing to interpret this shift in the integrand from the brane picture. As mentioned in sec., the AHS representation.) is suitable for the Fermi gas approach and Monte Carlo simulation, and easier to study the higher spin limit than the original representation.). Therefore it is illuminating to apply these approaches to the partition function and investigate wide parameter region. Finally we comment on a relation between the theory and L,) matrix model. The authors in 4] obtained.) by an analytic continuation from the partition function of the L, ) matrix model represented by a convergent series. Because its analytic continuation to the theory yields an ill-defined series, the AHS formula corresponds to its well-defined integral representation and correctly reproduces the formal series order by order in the perturbative expansion. Since here we have proven Z = Z AHS, our argument combined with the one in 4] might give key idea for rigorous proof of the analytic continuation. Acknowledgment We would like to thank Hidetoshi Awata, Shinji Hirano, Keita Nii and Masaki Shigemori for responses to our questions about the work 4] and another related work in progress. We would also like to thank Kazuo Hosomichi, Marcos Mariño, Sanefumi Moriyama and Kazumi Okuyama for valuable discussions and comments. We are grateful to Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics for hospitality, where part of this work was done. References ] O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M-branes and their gravity duals, JHEP 080 008) 09, arxiv:0806.8]. ] V. Pestun, Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops, Commun.Math.Phys. 33 0) 7 9, arxiv:07.84]. 3] A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter, JHEP 003 00) 089, arxiv:0909.4559], D. L. Jafferis, The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z, JHEP 05 0) 59, arxiv:0.30], N. Hama, K. Hosomichi, and S. Lee, Notes on SUSY Gauge Theories on Three-Sphere, JHEP 03 0) 7, arxiv:0.35], K. Ohta and Y. Yoshida, Non-Abelian Localization for Supersymmetric Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons Theories on Seifert Manifold, Phys.Rev. D86 0) 0508, arxiv:05.0046], N. Drukker, T. Okuda, and F. Passerini, Exact results for vortex loop operators in 3d supersymmetric theories, arxiv:.3409. 4] L. F. Alday, D. Martelli, P. Richmond, and J. Sparks, Localization on Three-Manifolds, arxiv:307.6848, J. Nian, Localization of Supersymmetric Chern-Simons-Matter Theory on a Squashed S 3 with SU) U) Isometry, arxiv:309.366, A. Tanaka, Localization on round sphere revisited, arxiv:309.499. 5] M. Marino and P. Putrov, Exact Results in M Theory from Topological Strings, JHEP 006 00) 0, arxiv:09.3074], N. Drukker, M. Marino, and P. Putrov, From weak to 9
strong coupling in M theory, Commun.Math.Phys. 306 0) 5 563, arxiv:007.3837], H. Fuji, S. Hirano, and S. Moriyama, Summing Up All Genus Free Energy of M Matrix Model, JHEP 08 0) 00, arxiv:06.463], T. Suyama, On Large N Solution of M Theory, Nucl.Phys. B834 00) 50 76, arxiv:09.084]; Eigenvalue Distributions in Matrix Models for Chern-Simons-matter Theories, Nucl.Phys. B856 0) 497 57, arxiv:06.347]. 6] N. Drukker and D. Trancanelli, A Supermatrix model for N=6 super Chern-Simons-matter theory, JHEP 00 00) 058, arxiv:09.3006]. 7] C. P. Herzog, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and T. Tesileanu, Multi-Matrix Models and Tri-Sasaki Einstein Spaces, Phys.Rev. D83 0) 04600, arxiv:0.5487]. 8] N. Drukker, M. Marino, and P. Putrov, Nonperturbative aspects of M theory, JHEP 0) 4, arxiv:03.4844]. 9] K. Okuyama, A Note on the Partition Function of M theory on S 3, Prog.Theor.Phys. 7 0) 9 4, arxiv:0.3555]. 0] M. Marino and P. Putrov, M theory as a Fermi gas, J.Stat.Mech. 03 0) P0300, arxiv:0.4066]. ] M. Hanada, M. Honda, Y. Honma, J. Nishimura, S. Shiba, and Y. Yoshida, Numerical studies of the M theory for arbitrary N at arbitrary coupling constant, JHEP 05 0), arxiv:0.5300]; Monte Carlo studies of 3d N=6 SCFT via localization method, PoS LATTICE0 0) 33, arxiv:.6844]. ] A. Klemm, M. Marino, M. Schiereck, and M. Soroush, M Wilson loops in the Fermi gas approach, arxiv:07.06. 3] Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama, and K. Okuyama, Exact Results on the M Fermi Gas, JHEP 0 0) 00, arxiv:07.483], P. Putrov and M. Yamazaki, Exact M Partition Function from TBA, Mod.Phys.Lett. A7 0) 5000, arxiv:07.5066]. 4] S. Bhattacharyya, A. Grassi, M. Marino, and A. Sen, A One-Loop Test of Quantum Supergravity, arxiv:0.6057. 5] Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama, and K. Okuyama, Instanton Effects in M Theory from Fermi Gas Approach, JHEP 30 03) 58, arxiv:.5], F. Calvo and M. Marino, Membrane instantons from a semiclassical TBA, JHEP 305 03) 006, arxiv:.58], Y. Hatsuda, S. Moriyama, and K. Okuyama, Instanton Bound States in M Theory, JHEP 305 03) 054, arxiv:30.584], Y. Hatsuda, M. Marino, S. Moriyama, and K. Okuyama, Non-perturbative effects and the refined topological string, arxiv:306.734, J. Kallen and M. Marino, Instanton effects and quantum spectral curves, arxiv:308.6485. 6] A. Grassi, J. Kallen, and M. Marino, The topological open string wavefunction, arxiv:304.6097. 7] Y. Hatsuda, M. Honda, S. Moriyama, and K. Okuyama, M Wilson Loops in Arbitrary Representations, arxiv:306.497. 8] M. Marino, Lectures on localization and matrix models in supersymmetric Chern-Simons-matter theories, J.Phys. A44 0) 46300, arxiv:04.0783]; Lectures on non-perturbative effects in large N gauge theories, matrix models and strings, arxiv:06.67. 0
9] A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, Nonperturbative Tests of Three-Dimensional Dualities, JHEP 00 00) 03, arxiv:003.5694]. 0] M. Marino and P. Putrov, Interacting fermions and N= Chern-Simons-matter theories, arxiv:06.6346. ] A. Cagnazzo, D. Sorokin, and L. Wulff, String instanton in AdS4) x CP**3, JHEP 005 00) 009, arxiv:09.58], K. Becker, M. Becker, and A. Strominger, Five-branes, membranes and nonperturbative string theory, Nucl.Phys. B456 995) 30 5, hep-th/950758]. ] O. Aharony, O. Bergman, and D. L. Jafferis, Fractional M-branes, JHEP 08 008) 043, arxiv:0807.494]. 3] C.-M. Chang, S. Minwalla, T. Sharma, and X. Yin, Triality: from Higher Spin Fields to Strings, J.Phys. A46 03) 4009, arxiv:07.4485], S. Giombi, S. Minwalla, S. Prakash, S. P. Trivedi, S. R. Wadia, et. al., Chern-Simons Theory with Vector Fermion Matter, Eur.Phys.J. C7 0), arxiv:0.4386]. 4] H. Awata, S. Hirano, and M. Shigemori, The Partition Function of Theory, arxiv:.966. 5] K. A. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, Mirror symmetry in three-dimensional gauge theories, Phys.Lett. B387 996) 53 59, hep-th/960707]. 6] A. Hanany and E. Witten, Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics, Nucl.Phys. B49 997) 5 90, hep-th/9630]. 7] D. R. Gulotta, C. P. Herzog, and S. S. Pufu, From Necklace Quivers to the F-theorem, Operator Counting, and TUN)), JHEP 0) 077, arxiv:05.87]. 8] S. Benvenuti and S. Pasquetti, 3D-partition functions on the sphere: exact evaluation and mirror symmetry, JHEP 05 0) 099, arxiv:05.55], T. Nishioka, Y. Tachikawa, and M. Yamazaki, 3d Partition Function as Overlap of Wavefunctions, JHEP 08 0) 003, arxiv:05.4390]. 9] C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Proofs of two conjectures related to the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, Commun.Math.Phys. 79 996) 667 680, solv-int/9509003]. 30] M. Marino, Chern-Simons theory, matrix integrals, and perturbative three manifold invariants, Commun.Math.Phys. 53 004) 5 49, hep-th/007096], M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Marino, and C. Vafa, Matrix model as a mirror of Chern-Simons theory, JHEP 0 004) 00, hep-th/0098]. 3] S. A. Yost, Supermatrix models, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A7 99) 605 60, hep-th/9033], R. Dijkgraaf and C. Vafa, N= supersymmetry, deconstruction, and bosonic gauge theories, hep-th/0300, R. Dijkgraaf, S. Gukov, V. A. Kazakov, and C. Vafa, Perturbative analysis of gauged matrix models, Phys.Rev. D68 003) 045007, hep-th/0038]. 3] E. L. Basor and P. J. Forrester, Formulas for the Evaluation of Toeplitz Determinants with Rational Generating Functions, Math.Nachr. 70 994) 5-8. 33] B. Willett and I. Yaakov, N= Dualities and Z Extremization in Three Dimensions, arxiv:04.0487. 34] A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, Tests of Seiberg-like Duality in Three Dimensions, arxiv:0.40.
35] M. Marino, Chern-Simons theory and topological strings, Rev.Mod.Phys. 77 005) 675 70, hep-th/0406005], M. Tierz, Soft matrix models and Chern-Simons partition functions, Mod.Phys.Lett. A9 004) 365 378, hep-th/08]. 36] A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, Seiberg Duality in Chern-Simons Theory, Nucl.Phys. B8 009), arxiv:0808.0360]. 37] T. Kitao, K. Ohta, and N. Ohta, Three-dimensional gauge dynamics from brane configurations with p,q) - five-brane, Nucl.Phys. B539 999) 79 06, hep-th/9808], O. Bergman, A. Hanany, A. Karch, and B. Kol, Branes and supersymmetry breaking in three-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP 990 999) 036, hep-th/9908075], K. Ohta, Supersymmetric index and s rule for type IIB branes, JHEP 990 999) 006, hep-th/99080]. 38] A. Hashimoto, S. Hirano, and P. Ouyang, Branes and fluxes in special holonomy manifolds and cascading field theories, JHEP 06 0) 0, arxiv:004.0903], T. Suyama, Supersymmetry Breaking in Chern-Simons-matter Theories, JHEP 07 0) 008, arxiv:03.039]. 39] L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories, Lett.Math.Phys. 9 00) 67 97, arxiv:0906.39]. 40] F. Nieri, S. Pasquetti, and F. Passerini, 3d & 5d gauge theory partition functions as q-deformed CFT correlators, arxiv:303.66. 4] M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Marino, and C. Vafa, Topological strings and integrable hierarchies, Commun.Math.Phys. 6 006) 45 56, hep-th/03085].