On-flight calibration of the Swift-XRT telescope

Similar documents
arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 7 Feb 2006

A huge explosion in the early Universe

THE X-RAY TELESCOPE ON BOARD SWIFT: STATUS AND MAIN RESULTS

The Palermo Swift-BAT Hard X-ray Catalogue

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 22 Sep 2005

Swift XRT observations of the breaking X-ray afterglow of GRB ABSTRACT

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.he] 22 Aug 2013

PoS(INTEGRAL 2010)134

XRT Light curves: Morphology, Flares and Energy

PoS(SWIFT 10)142. The Swift-XRT observations of HBL Source 1ES

X-ray flares in the early Swift observations of the possible naked gamma-ray burst ABSTRACT

A very wide field focusing telescope for Synoptic studies in the soft X-ray band

The Swift GRB MIDEX. Neil Gehrels May 20, 2002

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 11 May 2015

The Swift GRB MIDEX Mission, A Multi-frequency, Rapid-Response Space Observatory

THE EARLY X-RAY EMISSION FROM GRBs

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 16 May 2013

Chandra was launched aboard Space Shuttle Columbia on July 23, 1999!!!

Modelling the spectral response of the Swift-XRT CCD camera: Experience learnt from in-flight calibration

Swift observations of the prompt X-ray emission and afterglow from GRB and GRB050219A ABSTRACT

SERGIO CAMPANA SWIFT FOLLOW UP OF GW150914

The farthest GRBs similar to the closest

A FIRST LOOK WITH Chandra AT SGR AFTER THE GIANT FLARE: SIGNIFICANT SPECTRAL SOFTENING AND RAPID FLUX DECAY

PoS(INTEGRAL 2010)131

An origin for short γ-ray bursts unassociated with current star formation

PoS(Extremesky 2011)070

The SIMBOL-X hard X-ray optics

High Energy and Time Resolution Astronomy and Astrophysics: 1. X-ray Astronomy. 1. X-ray Astronomy. PhD Course, University of Padua Page 1

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 26 Apr 2016

X-ray Astronomy F R O M V - R O CKETS TO AT HENA MISSION. Thanassis Akylas

TESTING THE CURVATURE EFFECT AND INTERNAL ORIGIN OF GAMMA-RAY BURST PROMPT EMISSIONS AND X-RAY FLARES WITH SWIFT DATA

XMM-Newton Calibration

Space Astronomy Facilities

INTEGRAL Cross-calibration Status: Crab observations between 3 kev and 1 MeV

X-ray polarimetry and new prospects in high-energy astrophysics

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 16 May 2014

PoS(Extremesky 2011)009

IXYZ Frank Marshall NASA/GSFC 25 April April 25, 2012 Implementing Portals of the Universe

X-RAY LIGHT CURVES OF GRBS WITHOUT FLARES

Calibration of the IXPE Instrument

X- & γ-ray Instrumentation

XMM-NEWTON VIEW OF PKS : HARDNESS RATIO AND CROSS-CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF EPIC pn OBSERVATIONS

XMM-Newton Observations of the Isolated Neutron Star 1RXS J / RBS 1774

NEW WIDE FIELD CAMERA FOR SEARCH FOR FAST OPTICAL TRANSIENTS. A. Pozanenko IKI RAS, Moscow, Russia

Geant4-based simulations of the background for the erosita space observatory (with connections to IXO and Suzaku)

Semi conductor detectors for soft gamma-ray astrophysics

Extreme Astronomy and Supernovae. Professor Lynn Cominsky Department of Physics and Astronomy Sonoma State University

GRB060602B = Swift J : an unusual transiently accreting neutron-star X-ray binary

Status of the EPIC calibration

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 22 Jun 2005

GAME: GRB and All-Sky Monitor Experiment

Galactic and extragalactic hydrogen in the X-ray spectra of Gamma Ray Bursts

Fermi-LAT Recent Results on Gamma-Ray Bursts

Problem Solving. radians. 180 radians Stars & Elementary Astrophysics: Introduction Press F1 for Help 41. f s. picture. equation.

Swift observations of GRB : an anomalous burst with a well behaved afterglow ABSTRACT. ,andl p,iso E rest. , E γ E rest

When a Standard Candle Flickers: The Dimming of the Crab Nebula. Gary Case

Swift Follow-up Observations of Gravitational-wave Events

NuSTAR observation of the Arches cluster: X-ray spectrum extraction from a 2D image

Mapping the non thermal emission in Coma cluster of galaxies using the FeXXV/FeXXVI line ratio

Constraining the progenitors of long and short GRBs through the study of their environments

Lecture 20 High-Energy Astronomy. HEA intro X-ray astrophysics a very brief run through. Swift & GRBs 6.4 kev Fe line and the Kerr metric

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 30 May 2008

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 22 Sep 2006

9.1 Years of All-Sky Hard X-ray Monitoring with BATSE

Suzaku-WAM soft gamma-ray all-sky monitor by the earth occultation technique

Centre for Electronic Imaging

The X-Ray Counterpart of the Gamma-Ray Sky

The Presence of X-ray Spectral Curvature in HBLs at Different Redshifts

XMM-Newton SOC Technical Note

Bright gamma-ray sources observed by DArk Matter Particle Explorer

SVOM: a new mission for Gamma-Ray Bursts studies

The Complex kev X-Ray Spectrum of PKS

Prompt Emission Properties of Swift GRBs

ENERGY SCALE IN EPIC-PN TIMING MODE

PoS(extremesky2009)018

The Fermi Gamma-Ray Sky

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 11 May 2017

The Simbol{X mission

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.im] 12 Jun 2018

Using Gamma Ray Bursts to Estimate Luminosity Distances. Shanel Deal

PULSE PHASE VARIATIONS OF THE X-RAY SPECTRAL FEATURES IN THE RADIO-QUIET NEUTRON STAR 1E S. Mereghetti, A. De Luca, and P. A.

X-ray burst science with Astrosat

Searching for black holes in nearby galaxies with Simbol-X

Observing Compact Galactic Sources in X- and gamma-rays with AGILE

NuSTAR s Extreme Universe. Prof. Lynn Cominsky NASA Education and Public Outreach Sonoma State University

Analysis of extended sources with the EPIC cameras

VERITAS Design. Vladimir Vassiliev Whipple Observatory Harvard-Smithsonian CfA

BV R photometry of comparison stars in selected blazar fields

PoS(SWIFT 10)160. Broadband Transient Monitor using the Swift/BAT and the MAXI/GSC data. T. Sakamoto, Y. Oda and A. Yoshida

Analysis of Off-Nuclear X-Ray Sources in Galaxy NGC Sarah M. Harrison

FIGURE 1. The total kev logn-logs determined from several ROSAT surveys as indicated in the plot. Adapted from Hasinger et al.

Improving the Relative Accuracy of the HETGS Effective Area

Mid-Infrared Astronomy with IRAIT at Dome C: performances and simulations

Science of Compact X-Ray and Gamma-ray Objects: MAXI and GLAST

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.he] 29 Aug 2011

On ground and in-flight calibration. Fabio Muleri INAF-IAPS

ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS The discovery of 96 s pulsations from the variable X-ray source 1SAX J in the Large Magellanic Cloud

XMM observations of three middle-aged pulsars

Calibration of the AGILE Gamma Ray Imaging Detector

PoS(INTEGRAL 2012)049

Transcription:

Mem. S.A.It. Suppl. Vol. 9, 358 c SAIt 2006 Memorie della Supplementi On-flight calibration of the Swift-XRT telescope Giancarlo Cusumano 1, Valentina La Parola 1, Vanessa Mangano 1, Teresa Mineo 1, Sergio Campana 2, Milvia Capalbi 3, Guido Chincarini 2,4, Paolo Giommi 3, Alberto Moretti 2, Matteo Perri 3, Patrizia Romano 2, Gianpiero Tagliaferri 2, 1 INAF- Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica Sezione di Palermo, Via Ugo La Malfa 153, 90146 Palermo, Italy; e-mail: cusumano@pa.iasf.cnr.it 2 INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate, Italy 3 ASI Science Data Center, via Galileo Galilei, 00044 Frascati, Italy 4 Università degli studi di Milano-Bicocca, Dipartimento di Fisica, Piazza delle Scienze 3, I-20126 Milan, Italy Abstract. The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) Explorer was launched into orbit on November 20, 2004. The X-ray Telescope (XRT) is designed to perform prompt, automated observations of GRBs beginning about a minute after localization of bursts by the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT). The XRT is performing well in its initial months on orbit. In this paper I show the status of the on-flight calibration of the XRT effective area. Key words. X-rays: general space vehicles: instruments instrumentation: detectors Swift XRT is designed to detect and localize GRB and provide autonomous rapidresponse observation and long-term monitoring of their afterglow emission in the X-ray and UV/optical band. The observatory incorporates three primary instruments: the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT: Barthelmy et al. 2005), the X-ray telescope (XRT: Burrows et al. 2005) and the Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope (UVOT: Roming et al. 2005). The XRT is a focusing X-ray telescope operating in the 0.2-10 kev energy band. Is is provided of grazing incidence Wolter I mirrors (originally built for JET-X telescope) that focus X-ray onto a single E2V CCD-22 detector at the focal plane, similar to the EPIC MOS detector flown Send offprint requests to: G. Cusumano on XMM-Newton. The focal plane detector covers a field of view of 23 arcminutes diameter and it is equipped with four calibration sources located at each corner of the detector. The telescope provides a position accuracy of celestial sources of 3 arcsec and a Point Spread Function of 18 arcsec and 22 arcsec (HEW) at 1.5 kev and 8.1 kev, respectively. The XRT effective area is 135 cm 2 at 1.5 kev and 20 cm 2 at 8.1 kev. XRT supports four different read-out modes, each dependent on the brightness of the observed source, to cover the dynamic range and rapid variability expected from GRB afterglows. The transition between two modes is automatically performed on-board (see Hill et al. 2004 for an exhaustive description on XRT observing modes).

Cusumano: Calibration of Swift-XRT 359 Fig. 1. Data, best fit model and residuals of the Crab spectrum obtained with the on-flight LRPD ARF files. The Imaging mode (IM) works at the very beginning of the GRB aftertglow and it gives the prompt image of the field of view to provide a rapid evaluation of the source coordinates of the X-ray GRB counterpart. The CCD operates collecting the accumulated charge on the detector without any X-ray event recognition. The image is highly piled-up and produces no spectroscopy data. The Photodiode mode (PD) is designed for very bright sources and for high timing resolution. Depending on the source rate, data are telemetred on ground into two different modes: at high fluxes (< 60 Crab) data are telemetred in Piled-up PD (PUPD) mode in which data are grouped and spectral information is degraded; at lower fluxes (< 3 Crab) data are telemetred in Low Rate PD (LRPD) and full spectral information is available. High resolution light curves with a time resolution of 0.14 ms ara generated. The Windowed Timing (WT) mode is obtained by binning and compressing 10 rows into a single row, and then reading out only the central 200 column of the CCD. Therefore, it covers the central 8 arcminutes of the field of view and provide one dimensional imaging and full spectral capability with a time resolution is 1.7 ms. This mode is used for fluxes between 1-600 mcrab. Finally, the Photon Counting mode (PC) allows full spatial and spectral resolution for source fluxes below 1 mcrab with a timing resolution of 2.5 seconds. Crab-like supernova remnants are sources characterized by well known and stable power law spectral distributions. Thanks to these characteristics these objects are the best candidates for in-flight calibration of the global effective area of X-ray telescopes. The XRT effective area for the three XRT observing modes (LRPD, WT and PC) has been calibrated using the Crab nebula for LRPD and WT mode and PSR B0540-69 for PC mode. XRT data are first processed by the Swift Data Center at NASA/GSFC to calibrate and quality flag the event lists (level 1 data products). They are then filtered and screened using the XRTDAS (v.1.2) software package to produce cleaned photon list files. Only observing time inter-

360 Cusumano: Calibration of Swift-XRT Fig. 2. Data, best fit model and residuals of the Crab spectrum obtained with the on-flight WT ARF files vals with a CCD temperature below -47 degrees Celsius are used. Further non-standard selections are performed to remove time intervals with high background rate caused by either dark current or by the bright Earth limb. Hot and flickering pixels are also removed. There are two different ways of improving the instrument ancillary files. A first method relies on the knowledge of the physical processes related to the X-ray photon detection and aims to change physical parameters (e.g. gold density, inclusion of a carbon layer, CCD depletion depth, etc.). These improved ARF files are then compared with well-known astrophysical sources in order to optimize the physical parameters. A second method does not involve the knowledge of the micro-physics but simply relies on the spectra of well-known and stable astrophysical sources. The idea behind this approach is that the XRT spectrum is compared and optimized (modelling in depth the residuals) to be consistent with the observed one. Within XRT we perform an hybrid method. With regard to the CCD quantum efficiency, we improve our description of the photon detection with a micro-physic method (especially for the spectral line resolution) and then apply the second method to reduce the amplitude of the remaining residuals. To calibrate the LRPD ancillary files we consider an onaxis 6742 s exposure of the Crab, resulting in 5.5 10 6 counts in the energy range 0.5-10.0 kev. The high absorption at low energies does not allow to calibrate the spectrum below 0.5 kev. A procedure of ARF optimization was applyed to the LRPD ancillary files generated from on-ground calibrations in order to have a good description of the Crab data with the very well known spectral model parameters reported in the literature. This procedure allows us to produce a final LRPD ARF file that, when applied to Crab data, reproduces its spectral energy distribution with best fit parameters consistent with those reported in previous works based on data from other satellites (BeppoSAX: Massaro et al. 2000;

Cusumano: Calibration of Swift-XRT 361 Fig. 3. Data, best fit model and residuals of the calibration source PSR B0540-69 obtained with the on-flight PC ARF files. RXTE: Pravdo et al. 1997). In Figure 1 we show the residuals obtained fitting the LRPD Crab data with an absorbed power law, after correcting the ARF file. The reduced χ2 is 1.5 (919 degrees of freedom, dof). We estimate a systematic uncertainty at the level of 5% for all (i.e. different grade selections) LRPD ARF matrices in the 0.5-10 kev energy range. The strongest features are an absorption feature around 5 kev and an excess above 8 kev. In the case of the WT mode we used the Crab nebula as calibrator but in this case we have to deal with a moderate pile-up. To deal with this, we extracted the off-pulse Crab spectrum by applying a phase resolved analysis and verified that during this phase interval the lower average intensity of the nebula reduces the pile-up to a negligeable level. We observed the Crab on-axis in WT mode for 4373 s. We accumulated 2.2 10 6 counts in the energy range 0.5-10.0 kev. Again we tuned the WT ancillary files to reproduce the nebular spectral model parameters reported in the literature with low residuals. Figure 2 shows the residuals obtained by fitting the phase resolved Crab nebula spectrum with an absorbed power law. The fit is relatively good with χ2 is 1.4 (943 dof). We estimate a systematic uncertainty at a level of 5% for all grades and in the 0.5-10 kev energy range. The most prominent features are an emission line around 0.6 kev and an absorption feature around 1 kev. PC mode ancillary files have been calibrated with the Crablike plerion PSR B0540-69 (as in this read-out mode the Crab spectrum is too piled-up). The source has a count rate of about 0.7 counts s 1 but thanks to its moderate nebular extension (about 10-15 arcseconds) the source deos not suffer significantly from pile-up. Calibration was performed on a XRT data set of 32 ks exposure with a statistics of 22400 counts in the 0.2-10 kev energy band. The PSR B0540-69 best fit parameters based on previous X-ray missions (ROSAT PSPC, BeppoSAX MECS and XMM-Newton) are reported in the literature. Figure 3 shows data, best fit model and the fit residuals obtained with the on-flight PC

362 Cusumano: Calibration of Swift-XRT ARF files. The χ2 is 1.3 (130 dof). The statistical uncertainty on the final ARF matrices in PC mode is higher than for the other modes and at the moment it is estimated at 10% level in the 0.5-10 kev energy range. A strong and broad emission feature is present around 0.6 kev. References Barthelmy, S.D., et al. 2005, Space Science Burrows, D.N., et al. 2005, Space Science Hill, J.E., et al. 2004, SPIE, 5165, 217 Massaro E., Cusumano G., Litterio M., Mineo T., 2000, A&A, 361, 695 Pravdo S.H., Angelini L, Harding A.K., 1997, ApJ, 491, 808 Roming, P.W.A., et al. 2005, Space Science