An Introduction to Quantum Chemistry and Potential Energy Surfaces. Benjamin G. Levine

Similar documents
AN INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM CHEMISTRY. Mark S. Gordon Iowa State University

MO Calculation for a Diatomic Molecule. /4 0 ) i=1 j>i (1/r ij )

Example questions for Molecular modelling (Level 4) Dr. Adrian Mulholland

Chemistry 4560/5560 Molecular Modeling Fall 2014

CHEM3023: Spins, Atoms and Molecules

Chemistry 334 Part 2: Computational Quantum Chemistry

VALENCE Hilary Term 2018

Session 1. Introduction to Computational Chemistry. Computational (chemistry education) and/or (Computational chemistry) education

Figure 1: Transition State, Saddle Point, Reaction Pathway

Quantum mechanics can be used to calculate any property of a molecule. The energy E of a wavefunction Ψ evaluated for the Hamiltonian H is,

Conical Intersections. Spiridoula Matsika

Advanced Electronic Structure Theory Density functional theory. Dr Fred Manby

DFT calculations of NMR indirect spin spin coupling constants

CE 530 Molecular Simulation

Hartree, Hartree-Fock and post-hf methods

CHEM 545 Theory and Practice of Molecular Electronic Structure. Anna I. Krylov. DON T PANIC.

23 The Born-Oppenheimer approximation, the Many Electron Hamiltonian and the molecular Schrödinger Equation M I

Computational Methods. Chem 561

NPTEL/IITM. Molecular Spectroscopy Lectures 1 & 2. Prof.K. Mangala Sunder Page 1 of 15. Topics. Part I : Introductory concepts Topics

Lecture 08 Born Oppenheimer Approximation

Molecular energy levels

Electronic structure calculations: fundamentals George C. Schatz Northwestern University

Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

Electric properties of molecules

CHEM6085: Density Functional Theory Lecture 10

Practical Advice for Quantum Chemistry Computations. C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology

Lecture 9. Hartree Fock Method and Koopman s Theorem

Ayan Chattopadhyay Mainak Mustafi 3 rd yr Undergraduates Integrated MSc Chemistry IIT Kharagpur

Jack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah

Electron Correlation

A microscopic approach to nuclear dynamics. Cédric Simenel CEA/Saclay, France

Diatomic Molecules. 7th May Hydrogen Molecule: Born-Oppenheimer Approximation

P. W. Atkins and R. S. Friedman. Molecular Quantum Mechanics THIRD EDITION

Yingwei Wang Computational Quantum Chemistry 1 Hartree energy 2. 2 Many-body system 2. 3 Born-Oppenheimer approximation 2

Session 7 Overview: Part A I. Prediction of Vibrational Frequencies (IR) Part B III. Prediction of Electronic Transitions (UV-Vis) IV.

The Self Interaction Correction revisited

Quantum Chemical Simulations and Descriptors. Dr. Antonio Chana, Dr. Mosè Casalegno

Multi-reference Density Functional Theory. COLUMBUS Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 15 August 2005

I 2 Vapor Absorption Experiment and Determination of Bond Dissociation Energy.

Introduction to Computational Chemistry

Vibrational Spectra (IR and Raman) update Tinoco has very little, p.576, Engel Ch. 18, House Ch. 6

Lecture 4: methods and terminology, part II

σ u * 1s g - gerade u - ungerade * - antibonding σ g 1s

This is a very succinct primer intended as supplementary material for an undergraduate course in physical chemistry.

Condensed matter physics FKA091

Teoría del Funcional de la Densidad (Density Functional Theory)

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY FOR NON-THEORISTS JOHN P. PERDEW DEPARTMENTS OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY TEMPLE UNIVERSITY

Performance of Hartree-Fock and Correlated Methods

The Potential Energy Surface

QUANTUM CHEMISTRY FOR TRANSITION METALS

Chemistry 883 Computational Quantum Chemistry

Density Functional Theory

Methods for Treating Electron Correlation CHEM 430

Chemistry 2. Lecture 1 Quantum Mechanics in Chemistry

Introduction to Computational Chemistry

I 2 Vapor Absorption Experiment and Determination of Bond Dissociation Energy.

Jack Simons, Henry Eyring Scientist and Professor Chemistry Department University of Utah

Molecular Simulation I

Principles of Molecular Spectroscopy

Ab initio calculations for potential energy surfaces. D. Talbi GRAAL- Montpellier

OVERVIEW OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY METHODS

Chemistry 483 Lecture Topics Fall 2009

Same idea for polyatomics, keep track of identical atom e.g. NH 3 consider only valence electrons F(2s,2p) H(1s)

Chem 442 Review for Exam 2. Exact separation of the Hamiltonian of a hydrogenic atom into center-of-mass (3D) and relative (3D) components.

Chemistry 3502/4502. Final Exam Part I. May 14, 2005

Chemistry 3502/4502. Final Exam Part I. May 14, 2005

AN ACCELERATED SURFACE-HOPPING METHOD FOR COMPUTATIONAL SEMICLASSICAL MOLECULAR DYNAMICS. Laren K. Mortensen

Chemistry, Physics and the Born- Oppenheimer Approximation

/2Mα 2 α + V n (R)] χ (R) = E υ χ υ (R)

Molecular orbitals, potential energy surfaces and symmetry

The broad topic of physical metallurgy provides a basis that links the structure of materials with their properties, focusing primarily on metals.

(1/2) M α 2 α, ˆTe = i. 1 r i r j, ˆV NN = α>β

we have to deal simultaneously with the motion of the two heavy particles, the nuclei

Intro/Review of Quantum

Study of Ozone in Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal. Prof. S. Gurung Central Department of Physics, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

2~:J~ -ryej- r- 2 Jr. A - f3. sr(djk nv~tor rn~ +~ rvjs (::-CJ) ::;-1-.'--~ -. rhd. ('-.Ji.L.~ )- r'-d)c, -r/~ JJr - 2~d ~2-Jr fn'6.

Structure of diatomic molecules

Exp. 4. Quantum Chemical calculation: The potential energy curves and the orbitals of H2 +

Computational Chemistry I

Oslo node. Highly accurate calculations benchmarking and extrapolations

EXAM INFORMATION. Radial Distribution Function: B is the normalization constant. d dx. p 2 Operator: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle:

Theoretical Investigation of possible Chemiluminescent Analogs of 1,2-dioxetane

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE. The general molecular Schrödinger equation, apart from electron spin effects, is. nn ee en

On the Uniqueness of Molecular Orbitals and limitations of the MO-model.

Rotations and vibrations of polyatomic molecules

Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations

Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory

When are electrons fast and are Born and Oppenheimer correct?

Chemistry 2000 Lecture 1: Introduction to the molecular orbital theory

Quantum Mechanical Simulations

DFT and beyond: Hands-on Tutorial Workshop Tutorial 1: Basics of Electronic Structure Theory

Chemistry 881 Lecture Topics Fall 2001

Molecules in strong magnetic fields

221B Lecture Notes Many-Body Problems II Molecular Physics

The wavefunction that describes a bonding pair of electrons:

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 17, March 1, 2006

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

NMR and IR spectra & vibrational analysis

Wavepacket Correlation Function Approach for Nonadiabatic Reactions: Quasi-Jahn-Teller Model

Advanced Electronic Structure Theory Density functional theory. Dr Fred Manby

Transcription:

An Introduction to Quantum Chemistry and Potential Energy Surfaces Benjamin G. Levine

This Week s Lecture Potential energy surfaces What are they? What are they good for? How do we use them to solve chemical problems?

What do quantum chemists do? Approximate the electronic structures of molecules Extract useful chemical information from them

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R.

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy F = de dr Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy F = de dr Distance

Potential energy surface (PES) defined The PES, E(R), is the energy of a molecule as a function of the locations of its nuclei, R. Distance Energy F = de dr Distance

Using the PES Many important chemical question can be rephrased in terms of the PES We rarely calculate the whole PES, but instead explore and describe it in a variety of ways The PES can be calculated in many ways which vary in Accuracy Computational cost The portions of the PES which they are capable of describing

The PES is approximate The PES idea comes from the approximate solution of the full molecular time-independent Schrodinger equation Hˆ Ψ ( R, r) = EΨ( R, r)

The PES is approximate The PES idea comes from the approximate solution of the full molecular time-independent Schrodinger equation Hˆ Ψ ( R, r) = EΨ( R, r) Nuclear coordinates Electronic coordinates

The PES is approximate The molecular Hamiltonian is ˆ q q q H = ( R) ( r) + + 1 2 1 2 I J I 2mI I 2 i I i I J rij I i rij i j rij 1

The PES is approximate The molecular Hamiltonian is ˆ q q q H = ( R) ( r) + + 1 2 1 2 I J I 2mI I 2 i I i I J rij I i rij i j rij 1 I and J index nuclei i and j index electrons

The PES is approximate The molecular Hamiltonian is ˆ q q q H = ( R) ( r) + + 1 2 1 2 I J I 2mI I 2 i I i I J rij I i rij i j rij 1 m is represents mass r represents distance q represents charge

The PES is approximate The molecular Hamiltonian is ˆ q q q H = ( R) ( r) + + 1 2 1 2 I J I 2mI I 2 i I i I J rij I i rij i j rij 1 Nuclear Kinetic Energy Electronic Kinetic Energy

The PES is approximate The molecular Hamiltonian is ˆ q q q H = ( R) ( r) + + 1 2 1 2 I J I 2mI I 2 i I i I J rij I i rij i j rij 1 Nuclear Kinetic Energy Electronic Kinetic Energy Nuclear Repulsion Electron- Nuclear Attraction Electron- Electron Repulsion

The PES is approximate The molecular Hamiltonian is ˆ q q q H = ( R) ( r) + + 1 2 1 2 I J I 2mI I 2 i I i I J rij I i rij i j rij 1 Atomic Units ħ = 1 e = 1 m e = 1 1/(4 πε ) = 1 0

The PES is approximate Separate the nuclear and electronic problems (Born-Oppenheimer Approx.) Ψ ( R, r) = χ ( R) ψ ( r; R) Nuclear Wavefunction Electronic Wavefunction (which depends parametrically on the nuclear coordinates)

The PES is approximate Separate the nuclear and electronic problems (Born-Oppenheimer Approx.) Ψ ( R, r) = χ ( R) ψ ( r; R) Fast Electrons Slow Nucleus

The PES is approximate Separate the nuclear and electronic problems (Born-Oppenheimer Approx.) Ψ ( R, r) = χ ( R) ψ ( r; R) Hˆ ψ ( r; R) = V ( R) ψ ( r; R) elec q q ˆ 1 2 I J I elec = 2 i ( r) + + i I J rij I j rij i j rij H q 1

The PES is approximate Separate the nuclear and electronic problems (Born-Oppenheimer Approx.) Ψ ( R, r) = χ ( R) ψ ( r; R) Hˆ elecψ ( r; R) = V ( R) ψ ( r; R) q q ˆ 1 2 I J I elec = 2 i ( r) + + i I J rij I j rij i j rij H V(R) is the (adiabatic) potential energy surface q 1

The PES is approximate Separate the nuclear and electronic problems (Born-Oppenheimer Approx.) Ψ ( R, r) = χ ( R) ψ ( r; R) Hˆ elecψ ( r; R) = V ( R) ψ ( r; R) q q ˆ 1 2 I J I elec = 2 i ( r) + + i I J rij I j rij i j rij H V(R) is the (adiabatic) potential energy surface This is the electronic structure problem q 1

The PES is approximate Separate the nuclear and electronic problems (Born-Oppenheimer Approx.) Hˆ ψ ( r; R) = V ( R) ψ ( r; R) Hˆ χ ( R) = Eχ ( R) nuc ˆ 1 2 ( ) ( ) nuc = 2m I I R + V R I H Ψ ( R, r) = χ ( R) ψ ( r; R) elec q q ˆ 1 2 I J I elec = 2 i ( r) + + i I J rij I j rij i j rij H q 1

The PES is approximate The Born-Oppenheimer Approximation (BOA) neglects couplings between electronic and nuclear motions These missing terms are called nonadiabatic or vibronic coupling terms The BOA is a good approximation when electronic states are not near each other in energy (ground states of stable molecules with simple electronic structures) Electronic states are near each other in energy sometimes: Some transition states (nonadiabatic reaction dynamics) Excited states/photochemistry Jahn-Teller systems The BOA is valid for the majority of problems you see in the literature and in this course

Adiabatic vs Diabatic PES Adiabatic PES are the solution to the electronic Schrodinger equation Diabatic PES are defined according to state character (e.g. covalent vs ionic)

Adiabatic vs Diabatic PES Adiabatic PES are the solution to the electronic Schrodinger equation Diabatic PES are defined according to state character (e.g. covalent vs ionic) Ionic Covalent Diabatic

Adiabatic vs Diabatic PES Adiabatic PES are the solution to the electronic Schrodinger equation Diabatic PES are defined according to state character (e.g. covalent vs ionic) Ionic Covalent Diabatic Adiabatic

Adiabatic vs Diabatic PES Adiabatic PES are the solution to the electronic Schrodinger equation Diabatic PES are defined according to state character (e.g. covalent vs ionic) Ionic S 1 Covalent S 0 Diabatic Adiabatic

Diabatic PES Diabats are conceptually convenient There is no unique way to define diabats Diabats can be very strongly coupled over a broad range of configuration space Ionic Covalent Diabatic

The PES is many-dimensional Each atom is a point in a 3-D space the PES is 3N dimensional (where N is the number of atoms) The molecular geometry (configuration, structure) can be represented many ways Cartesian coordinates Internal Coordinates (e.g. Z-matrix)

Cartesian Coordinates Also known as XYZ coordinates y O -0.464 0.177 0.0 H -0.464 1.137 0.0 H 0.441-0.143 0.0 x Used in various common storage formats:.xyz,.pdb

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 1.500

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905 0.905

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905, 2, 104.5 104.5

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905, 2, 104.5 H, 2, 0.905, 1, 104.5 104.5 0.905

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905, 2, 104.5 H, 2, 0.905, 1, 104.5, 3, 180.0 180

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905, 2, 104.5 H, 2, 0.905, 1, 104.5, 3, 180.0 180

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905, 2, 104.5 H, 2, 0.905, 1, 104.5, 3, 90.0 90

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905, 2, 104.5 H, 2, 0.905, 1, 104.5, 3, 0.0 0

Z-Matrix Coordinates Define bond lengths, angles, dihedrals O O, 1, 1.500 H, 1, 0.905, 2, 104.5 H, 2, 0.905, 1, 104.5, 3, -90.0-90

Z-Matrix Coordinates Advantages 3 Chemically intuitive Non-redundant (eliminates translation, rotation) Disadvantages For large or cyclic molecules the geometry can be very sensitive to small changes in the parameters Equations of motion/geometry optimization are more nature in Cartesians. 4 2 1 5 6

Local Minima Correspond to Stable Structures At reasonable temperatures molecules tend to spend most of their time at low energy points on the PES

Local Minima Correspond to Stable Structures At reasonable temperatures molecules tend to spend most of their time at low energy points on the PES Distance Energy Distance

Local Minima Correspond to Stable Structures At reasonable temperatures molecules tend to spend most of their time at low energy points on the PES Distance Energy Equilibrium Distance Distance

Local Minima Correspond to Stable Structures At reasonable temperatures molecules tend to spend most of their time at low energy points on the PES Distance Energy What does this energy mean? Equilibrium Distance Distance

Local Minima Correspond to Stable Structures At reasonable temperatures molecules tend to spend most of their time at low energy points on the PES Distance Energy What does this energy mean? NOTHING! Equilibrium Distance Distance

Local Minima Correspond to Stable Structures At reasonable temperatures molecules tend to spend most of their time at low energy points on the PES Distance Energy What does this energy mean? NOTHING! Equilibrium Distance Distance Dissociation Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find In many dimensional systems we use geometry optimization algorithms Iterative process Calculate gradient of the PES (AKA forces) Update geometry Check for convergence Repeat if necessary

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Convergence criteria The gradient (force) is below a threshold The change in geometry from the previous step is below a threshold The change in energy from the previous step is below a threshold

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D+ΔD Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D+ΔD Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate E(D+ΔD) (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D-ΔD Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate E(D+ΔD) (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D-ΔD Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate E(D+ΔD) E(D-ΔD) (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D-ΔD Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate E(D+ΔD) - E(D-ΔD) F = 2ΔD (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D-ΔD Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Central finite difference Actually differentiate E(D+ΔD) - E(D-ΔD) F = 2ΔD (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find A word on forces D-ΔD Forces are a 3N-dimensional vector (x, y, and z force on each atom) Analytical forces Actually differentiate E(D+ΔD) - E(D) F = 2ΔD (Computational) cost is similar to calculating energy Available for most simpler methods of calculating the PES Numerical forces Forward finite difference Compute derivative by finite difference Cost is at least 3N times the cost of calculating the energy Available for all methods of calculating the PES

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Energy

Energy A Good Minimum is Hard to Find Global Minimum Local Minimum

Energy A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum?

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy R O Ketone R' R OH Enol R'

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy R O Ketone R' R OH Enol R'

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy R R R' trans R' gauche

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy ΔE R R R' trans R' gauche

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy H C N C N H

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy H C N H C N Transition State (TS) C N H

A Good Minimum is Hard to Find How do you know you ve found the global minimum? Which minimum do you want? Energy E activation H C N H C N Transition State (TS) C N H

A Good Transition State is Really A TS is defined as the highest point along the lowest energy path between reactant and product is a stable point (F=0) has a single imaginary frequency (one normal mode in which the second derivative is negative) Hard to Find Energy H C N Transition State (TS)

A Good Transition State is Really A TS can be found using one of the TS optimization algorithms available in most quantum chemistry codes by a series of constrained optimizations with only a single reaction coordinate is constrained Hard to Find Energy H C N Transition State (TS)

A Good Transition State is Really Hard to Find 3 2.5 C H N Energy (ev) 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 H C N C N H 0 60 120 180 H-C-N Angle (deg)

Calculating Vibrational Frequencies Energy harmonic approx. Distance true PES Calculate the second derivative matrix (Hessian): 2 d E 2 dr at the minimum Diagonalize mass weighted hessian to get normal modes Calculate frequencies according to the well known solution of the harmonic oscillator problem

Energy Differences and Errors Two types of errors Constant error an error that is the same for all points on the PES Non-parallelity error an error that varies from point to point of the PES

Energy Differences and Errors Constant Error Exact

Energy Differences and Errors Constant Error Exact Approx.

Energy Differences and Errors Constant Error Exact Energy Calculated Exact Approx. Distance

Energy Differences and Errors Constant Error Exact Energy Calculated Exact Approx. Distance

Energy Differences and Errors Constant Error Exact Energy Calculated Exact Approx. Distance

Energy Differences and Errors Constant Error Exact Energy Calculated Exact Approx. Distance Constant errors in energy usually don t matter

Energy Differences and Errors Non-parallelity Error Calculated Energy Exact Distance

Energy Differences and Errors Non-parallelity Error Calculated Energy Exact Wrong dissociation energy Distance

Energy Differences and Errors Non-parallelity Error Calculated Energy Exact Wrong dissociation energy Distance Wrong frequencies

Energy Differences and Errors Non-parallelity Error Calculated Energy Exact Wrong dissociation energy Distance Wrong frequencies Non-parallelity errors matter!

Energy v. Free Energy Free energies, not energies, determine the probability of being in a specific state at finite temperature The energy of a molecule at a specific geometry is an energy, NOT a free energy! Some additional work is required to get a free energy estimate from frequencies RRKM theory estimate reaction rates from frequencies at the reactant and transition state molecular dynamics

Energy v. Free Energy

Energy v. Free Energy Low Energy Low Energy

Energy v. Free Energy Wide well

Energy v. Free Energy Wide well Narrow well

Energy v. Free Energy Wide well Higher Entropy Narrow well Lower Entropy

Energy v. Free Energy Wide well Higher Entropy Lower Free Energy Narrow well Lower Entropy High Free Energy

Energy v. Free Energy Lower Frequency Wide well Higher Entropy Lower Free Energy Higher Frequency Narrow well Lower Entropy High Free Energy

The PES isn t everything Electronic properties can be calculated from the wavefunction Dipole, quadrupole moments Atomic charges Polarizabilities IR intensities NMR chemical shifts

Summary The PES is the energy as a function of the location of the nuclei Stationary points (F=0) on the PES are representative of stable structures and transition states Non-parallelity error in the PES is bad; error cancellation is your friend We can calculate electronic properties from the wavefunction

The Hierarchy of Methods Cost Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Cost HF Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Cost HF Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Cost MP2 HF Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Configuration Interaction (CI) Cost MP2 CI HF Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Configuration Interaction (CI) Coupled Cluster (CC) Cost MP2 CI CC HF Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Configuration Interaction (CI) Coupled Cluster (CC) Cost MC MP2 CI CC Multiconfigurational Methods (MC) HF Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Configuration Interaction (CI) Coupled Cluster (CC) Cost MC MP2 CI CC Multiconfigurational Methods (MC) HF Break bonds Excited States Open Shells Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Configuration Interaction (CI) Coupled Cluster (CC) Cost MC MP2 CI CC Multiconfigurational Methods (MC) HF DFT Density Functional Theory (DFT) Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Configuration Interaction (CI) Coupled Cluster (CC) Cost MC MP2 CI CC Multiconfigurational Methods (MC) HF DFT Density Functional Theory (DFT) SE Semiempirical (SE) Accuracy

The Hierarchy of Methods Hartree-Fock (HF) Post-HF Moller-Plesset Perturb. Theory (MP2) Configuration Interaction (CI) Coupled Cluster (CC) Cost MC MP2 CI CC Multiconfigurational Methods (MC) HF DFT Density Functional Theory (DFT) SE Semiempirical (SE) Accuracy

Coming Up Next Linear Algebra Review Superposition principle Variational Principle Basis Sets and the relationship between matrices and operators Hartree-Fock Approximation What is it? How is it implemented in the computer? When does it fail and why?