Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009

Similar documents
A talk for string theorists.

theory perspective LEPP JC, 9 September 2011 Cornell University Flip Tanedo Flip s Beamer Theme 1/17 17

Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011

The HL-LHC physics program

Recent results from rare decays

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

PoS(FPCP2009)013. Fabrizio Scuri I.N.F.N. - Sezione di Pisa - Italy

LHCb results relevant to SUSY and BSM physics

The Physics of Heavy Z-prime Gauge Bosons

EDMs and flavor violation in SUSY models

Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca

New Physics & Future B Physics Programs CP violation Rare Decays

arxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Apr 2000

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 5 Sep 2014

Rare B decay searches with BABAR using hadronic tag reconstruction

Weak Decays, CKM, Anders Ryd Cornell University

Rare decays at LHCb Siim Tolk (NIKHEF, Amsterdam) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

Rare beauty and charm decays at LHCb

SUSY Phenomenology a

SUSY at Accelerators (other than the LHC)

LHCb New B physics ideas

Constraints on new physics from rare (semi-)leptonic B decays

Bs studies at a SuperB: physics case and experimental potentialities

Theoretical Review on Lepton Universality and LFV

EW Naturalness in Light of the LHC Data. Maxim Perelstein, Cornell U. ACP Winter Conference, March

sin(2θ ) t 1 χ o o o

Split SUSY and the LHC

Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM

Walter Hopkins. February

SUSY at Accelerators (other than the LHC)

Searches for Beyond SM Physics with ATLAS and CMS

Unitary Triangle Analysis: Past, Present, Future

Flavour physics beyond the Standard Model

Physics Beyond the. Texas A&M University. For the. Mini-Symposium May, 2009

Chaehyun Yu. in collaboration with P. Ko (KIAS) and Yuji Omura (Nagoya University) The 16 th LHC Physics Monthly Meeting, KIAS, Korea, Jun 01,

B-meson anomalies & Higgs physics in flavored U(1) model

FLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL

Supersymmetry Breaking

SuperB Report Intensity Frontier Workshop

Andreas Crivellin ITP Bern. Rare decays and MSSM phenomenology

SUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC

Probing the charged Higgs boson at the LHC in the CP-violating type-ii 2HDM

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 21 Jan 2012

Future Belle II experiment at the KEK laboratory

Flavour Opportunities at the Intensity Frontier

Washington University in St. Louis. W. Altmannshofer, BD and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 96, (2017) [arxiv: [hep-ph]] and in preparation.

B Kl + l at Low Hadronic Recoil

Discovery potential for SUGRA/SUSY at CMS

Rencontres de Moriond - EW Interactions and Unified Theories La Thuile, March 14-21, 2015

LHCb Discovery potential for New Physics

New results on flavor anomalies at LHCb

Results from B-Physics (LHCb, BELLE)

Theory overview on rare eta decays

Detecting Higgs Bosons within Supersymmetric Models

Experimental Status and Expectations Regarding Radiative Penguin Decays

Probing Supersymmetric Connection with Dark Matter

Rare Decays at the Tevatron

Indirect constraints on the (C)MSSM parameter space

Probing New Physics Through B s Mixing

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 8 Nov 2010

The pheno analysis of B K ( ) µ + µ decays in 2011+

SUSY-related Lepton and Hadron Flavor Results from Belle Yutaro Sato

RESULTS FROM B-FACTORIES

Flavour physics in the LHC era

Natural Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in NMSSM and Higgs at 100 GeV

New Probes of New Physics with Leptonic Rare B Decays

Interconnection between Particle Physics and Cosmology at the LHC

New Physics search in penguin B-decays

LHCb results and prospects

J.Hisano, Y.S, hep-ph/ PLB)

Searching for top FCNC decay t ch at future e + e colliders

SEARCHES FOR THE NEUTRAL HIGGS BOSONS OF THE MSSM

Probing Dark Matter at the LHC

Aspetti della fisica oltre il Modello Standard all LHC

SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches

SUSY and Exotics. UK HEP Forum"From the Tevatron to the LHC, Cosener s House, May /05/2009 Steve King, UK HEP Forum '09, Abingdon 1

Can the Hbb coupling be equal in magnitude to its Standard Model value but opposite in sign? Howard E. Haber July 22, 2014

2 Induced LFV in the SUSY see-saw framework

Introduction ffl MSSM with R-parity too many free parameters (124): mostly come from the flavor sector in the soft SUSY breaking Lagrangian generic FC

Heavy Flavour Physics at the LHC. Lessons from the first phase of the LHC DESY 27 September 2012

Flavor Physics Part 2

Rare decays of beauty mesons

Measuring CP violation in. B s φφ with LHCb. Jim Libby (University of Oxford) for the LHCb collaboration. 14/12/2006 CKM 2006 Nagoya 1

Probing the Connection Between Supersymmetry and Dark Matter

Updates from UTfit within and beyond the Standard Model

Lecture 12: SUSY3. 1

The Lightest Higgs Boson and Relic Neutralino in the MSSM with CP Violation

Radiative and EW Penguin B-Decays with the Belle Detector. Beauty 2003

Split Supersymmetry A Model Building Approach

SuperB. Adrian Bevan. CIPANP 09, San Diego, May 2009.

Searching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum

B-physics with ATLAS and CMS

Scalar leptoquarks from GUT to accommodate the B-physics anomalies

Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation. Update on BaBar Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation using Tau Decays

Outline: Introduction Search for new Physics Model driven Signature based General searches. Search for new Physics at CDF

Physics at the TeV Scale Discovery Prospects Using the ATLAS Detector at the LHC

Discussion on (Heavy) Flavor Physics

e + e - (1) Silicon Vertex Detector

Search for physics beyond the Standard Model at LEP 2

Transcription:

A Case Study of B s µ + µ in the MSSM Based on arxiv:0812:4320 In collaboration with A. Dedes, J Rosiek. Cornell University Informal CIHEP Pizza Lunch February 6, 2009 Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 1 / 16

GeV 10 19 String Theory 10 16 Unification &!s 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 Supersymmetry LHC Energy... eventually EWSB brown muck of Hadronic Physics 10-6 Cosmology... not to scale Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 2 / 16

GeV 10 19 String Theory 10 16 Unification &!s 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 Supersymmetry LHC Energy... eventually EWSB brown muck of Hadronic Physics 10-6 Cosmology... not to scale Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 2 / 16

GeV 10 19 10 16 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10-6 String Theory Unification &!s Supersymmetry LHC Energy... eventually EWSB brown muck of Hadronic Physics Cosmology... not to scale decreasing espresso machine responsibility Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 2 / 16

Complimentarity Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 3 / 16

The program of flavor physics Goniometry The measurement of angles Luminosity frontier Many different measurements Laboratory: B mesons We will focus on one particular decay (B s µµ), but one should always remember that it s just one piece of a larger program. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 4 / 16

B-mesons: state-of-the-art flavor laboratories Meson Mass Mean lifetime Bd 0 5.280 GeV 1.53 10 12 s Bs 0 5.370 GeV 1.44 10 12 s B-factories traditionally run at Υ(4S) resonance, which produce B d, but not B s. B-mesons have just the right mass and width to allow us to measure their oscillation (CP phase). Asymmetric B-factories allow us to measure the different branching ratios of B and B mesons. Presently we are interested in FCNC B-decays. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 5 / 16

The March of the Penguins b s Penguin diagram Allows FCNC sub-diagram to occur on-shell. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 6 / 16

The March of the Penguins Penguin diagram b u i s Allows FCNC sub-diagram to occur on-shell. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 6 / 16

The March of the Penguins Penguin diagram b u i s Allows FCNC sub-diagram to occur on-shell. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 6 / 16

The March of the Penguins Penguin diagram b u i s Allows FCNC sub-diagram to occur on-shell. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 6 / 16

The March of the Penguins new physics Penguin diagram b u i s Allows FCNC sub-diagram to occur on-shell. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 6 / 16

The March of the Penguins new physics Penguin diagram b u i s Allows FCNC sub-diagram to occur on-shell. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 6 / 16

The March of the Penguins new physics Penguin diagram b u i s Allows FCNC sub-diagram to occur on-shell. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 6 / 16

The March of the Penguins Where do we look for penguins? Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 7 / 16

The March of the Penguins Where do we look for penguins? Antarctica. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 7 / 16

The March of the Penguins Where do we look for penguins? Antarctica. Very little background, penguin is dominant fauna. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 7 / 16

The March of the Penguins µ µ Where do we look for SUSY penguins? B s µ + µ. Very little background, penguin is dominant process. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 7 / 16

B s µ + µ : Very little background The Standard Model background is suppressed by... Loop: no tree-level contribution, (16π 2 ) 1 FCNC: GIM suppression, V V bs Helicity: Lepton mass insertion, m µ /M Bs Channel Expt. Bound (90% CL) SM Prediction Bs 0 µ + µ CDF II < 4.7 10 8 (4.8 ± 1.3) 10 9 Bd 0 µ + µ CDF II < 1.5 10 8 (1.4 ± 0.4) 10 10 Bs 0 µ + e CDF II < 2.0 10 7 0 Bd 0 µ + e CDF II < 6.4 10 8 0 Clean dilepton signal, only hadronic uncertainty is f B. Ideal for LHC. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 8 / 16

B s µ + µ : Penguin is the dominant process In the MSSM, the Higgs-penguin mediated B s µ + µ diagram is sensitive to tan β. Recall: tan β = v u /v d. b b µ µ ( ) ( ) ( ) m sr b s 0 sl R y b ɛv u m b b L Amplitude is enhanced by tan 3 β. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 9 / 16

B s µ + µ : Penguin is the dominant process In the MSSM, the Higgs-penguin mediated B s µ + µ diagram is sensitive to tan β. Recall: tan β = v u /v d. b b µ µ ( ) ( ) ( ) m sr b s 0 sl R y b ɛv u m b b L y b,l = m b,l v d 1 cos β tan β 1 tan β Amplitude is enhanced by tan 3 β. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 9 / 16

B s µ + µ : Penguin is the dominant process In the MSSM, the Higgs-penguin mediated B s µ + µ diagram is sensitive to tan β. Recall: tan β = v u /v d. b y d µ ( ) ( ) ( ) m sr b s 0 sl R y b ɛv u m b b L b µ y b,l = m b,l v d 1 cos β tan β 1 tan β Amplitude is enhanced by tan 3 β. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 9 / 16

B s µ + µ : Penguin is the dominant process In the MSSM, the Higgs-penguin mediated B s µ + µ diagram is sensitive to tan β. Recall: tan β = v u /v d. b y d y l µ ( ) ( ) ( ) m sr b s 0 sl R y b ɛv u m b b L b µ y b,l = m b,l v d 1 cos β tan β 1 tan β Amplitude is enhanced by tan 3 β. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 9 / 16

B s µ + µ : Penguin is the dominant process In the MSSM, the Higgs-penguin mediated B s µ + µ diagram is sensitive to tan β. Recall: tan β = v u /v d. b b y d y l µ µ ( ) ( ) ( ) m sr b s 0 sl R y b ɛv u m b b L s-b mixing: sin θ y b ɛv u /m b ɛ tan β y b,l = m b,l v d 1 cos β tan β 1 tan β Amplitude is enhanced by tan 3 β. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 9 / 16

The March of the Penguins The standard model background... Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 10 / 16

The March of the Penguins The standard model background... and SUSY at large tan β Br (B s µµ) 5 10 7 (tan β/50) 6 (300 GeV/M A 0) 4 Motivation: Grand unification, msugra + (g 2) µ Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 10 / 16

But what about low tan β? Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 11 / 16

But what about low tan β? b d χ 0 µ l b g d Z µ b ũ χ + h µ s χ 0 µ s d µ s χ µ No photon penguin by Ward identity. Higgs penguin no longer dominant One has to consider interference with other diagrams Possibility: cancellation below SM prediction? Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 12 / 16

Low tan β scan + - ) μ μ Br(B s -> 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 5 10 15 20 25 30 tan β + - ) Br(B s -> 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 23 d LR Scan over MSSM parameter space with respect to SM prediction and experimental limit, taking into account existing experimental bounds. μ μ δ Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 13 / 16

Low tan β scan + - ) μ μ Br(B s -> 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 5 10 15 20 25 30 tan β + - ) μ μ Br(B s -> 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 23 d LR Scan over MSSM parameter space with respect to SM prediction and experimental limit, taking into account existing experimental bounds. δ Mass insertion parameterizes flavor violation: δ IJ (M 2 QXY = Q) IJ XY q (MQ 2 )IJ XX (M Q 2 )IJ YY Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 13 / 16

Low tan β scan + - ) μ μ Br(B s -> 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 5 10 15 20 25 30 tan β + - ) μ μ Br(B s -> 10-6 10-7 10-8 10-9 10-10 10-11 10-12 -0.1-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 23 d LR Scan over MSSM parameter space with respect to SM prediction and experimental limit, taking into account existing experimental bounds. δ Mass insertion parameterizes flavor violation: δ IJ (M 2 QXY = Q) IJ XY q (MQ 2 )IJ XX (M Q 2 )IJ YY Funnel region: Pseudoscalar and axial contributions cancel, scalar contribution is negligible; e.g. models where MSSM is extended with an additional light CP-odd Higgs. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 13 / 16

LHCb benchmark process Potential... Signal in 1Y Discovery in 3Y Implications on LHCb upgrade? (B s or B d?) Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 14 / 16

General purpose detectors... Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 15 / 16

Conclusion: Lessons Theory There is life outside of Minimal Flavor Violation (MFV)... though perhaps only minimal life? We can model-build beyond MFV; e.g. 0712.0674, 0712,2074 Our numerical code is available Experiment Keep an eye out for a measurement of B s µµ Non-discovery at SM limit could hit at low tan β, beyond-mfv Need to think about LHCb upgrade scenarios Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16

Range of input parameters for numerical scan Parameter Symbol Min Max Step Ratio of Higgs vevs tan β 2 30 varied CKM phase γ 0 π π/25 CP-odd Higgs mass M A 100 500 200 SUSY Higgs mixing µ -450 450 300 SU(2) gaugino mass M 2 100 500 200 Gluino mass M 3 3M 2 3M 2 0 SUSY scale M SUSY 500 1000 500 Slepton Masses M l M SUSY /3 M SUSY /3 0 Left top squark mass M QL 200 500 300 Right bottom squark mass M br 200 500 300 Right top squark mass M t R 150 300 150 Mass insertion δdll, 13 δdll 23-1 1 1/10 Mass insertion δdlr, 13 δdlr 23-0.1 0.1 1/100 Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16

Constraints used in numerical scan Quantity Current Measurement Experimental Error m χ 0 1 > 46 GeV > 94 GeV m χ ± 1 m b > 89 GeV m t > 95.7 GeV m h > 92.8 GeV ɛ K 2.232 10 3 0.007 10 3 M K 3.483 10 15 0.006 10 15 M D < 0.46 10 13 M Bd 3.337 10 13 GeV 0.033 10 13 GeV M Bs 116.96 10 13 GeV 0.79 10 13 GeV Br(B X sγ) 3.34 10 4 0.38 10 4 Br(K L π 0 ν ν) < 1.5 10 10 Br(K + π + ν ν) 1.5 10 10 1.3 10 10 Electron EDM < 0.07 10 26 Neutron EDM < 0.63 10 25 Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16

Calculation: Effective Operators The effective Hamiltonian can be written as H = 1 (4π) 2 (C VXY O VXY + C SXY O SXY + C TX O TX ) X,Y =L,R Writing flavor indices I, J, K, L, the operators are O IJKL VXY = (qj γ µ P X q I )(l L γ µ P Y l K ) O IJKL SXY = (qj P X q I )(l L P Y l K ) O IJKL TX = (qj σ µν P X q I )(l L σ µν l K ) Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16

Calculation: Factorization The hadronic and leptonic parts of the matrix element factorize: l, l H eff B(p) = l, l OL i 0 0 Oi Q B(p) i=ops Definition of the decay constant, f B 0 bγ µ P L,R s B(p) = i 2 p µf B 0 bp L,R s B(p) = ± i M B f B 2 m b + m s Note that there are no tensor ( bσ µν s) operators by antisymmetry. f B contains all the hadronic muck; look it up from non-perturbative methods (i.e. lattice). Leptonic decay: don t have to worry about jets, inclusive decays, etc. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16

Calculation: Amplitude We can now write the amplitude in terms of form factors M = F S ll + F P lγ 5 l + F V p µ lγ µ l + F A p µ lγ µ γ 5 l In terms of the Wilson coefficients, these are F S = i MB 2 s f Bs (C SLL + C SLR C SRR C SRL ) 4 m b + m s F P = i MB 2 s f Bs ( C SLL + C SLR C SRR + C SRL ) 4 m b + m s F V = i 4 f B s (C VLL + C VLR C VRR C VRL ) F A = i 4 f B s ( C VLL + C VLR C VRR + C VRL ) Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16

Calculation: Branching Ratio B(B 0 s l L l+ K ) = s τ «s B s M 2 mlk + m 2 «ll mlk m 2 ll 1 1 16π M Bs M Bs M Bs M 2 = 2 F S 2 h M 2 B s (m ll + m lk ) 2i + 2 F P 2 h M 2 B s (m ll m lk ) 2i + 2 F V 2 h M 2 B s (m lk m ll ) 2 (m 2 l K m 2 l L ) 2i + 2 F A 2 h M 2 B s (m lk + m ll ) 2 (m 2 l K m 2 l L ) 2i + 4 Re(F S FV )(m ll m lk ) hm 2 Bs + (m lk + m ll ) 2i h + 4 Re(F P FA )(m ll + m lk ) MB 2 s (m ll m lk ) 2i. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16

Calculation: B s µ + µ at low tan β For the case l K = l L = µ, the amplitude-squared is M 2 2M 2 B q ( F S 2 + F P + 2 m µ F A 2), where we have also taken m µ /M B 0. The minima of this comes from two cases, (1) F P + 2m l F A 0, F P F S (2) F S F P F A 0. Flip Tanedo, Cornell University/CIHEP The Birds and the Bs: B µµ 16 / 16