Gravitational light bending prevents gamma-gamma absorption in gravitational lenses

Similar documents
Part two of a year-long introduction to astrophysics:

Markus Boettcher Centre for Space Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa

Black Hole and Host Galaxy Mass Estimates

The cosmic distance scale

PoS(SSC2015)051. Multi-tomography of polars from SALT spectroscopy

Active Galaxies. Lecture Topics. Lecture 24. Active Galaxies. Potential exam topics. What powers these things? Lec. 24: Active Galaxies

Active Galactic Nuclei

Age-redshift relation. The time since the big bang depends on the cosmological parameters.

RESOLVING HIGH ENERGY UNIVERSE USING STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING. Anna Barnacka Einstein Fellow at Harvard

ASTRON 331 Astrophysics TEST 1 May 5, This is a closed-book test. No notes, books, or calculators allowed.

Can blazar flares be triggered by the VHE gamma-rays from the surrounding of a supermassive black hole?

Astronomy A BEGINNER S GUIDE TO THE UNIVERSE EIGHTH EDITION

Recent Results from VERITAS

Quasars ASTR 2120 Sarazin. Quintuple Gravitational Lens Quasar

Active Galactic Nuclei - Zoology

LARGE QUASAR GROUPS. Kevin Rahill Astrophysics

Number of Stars: 100 billion (10 11 ) Mass : 5 x Solar masses. Size of Disk: 100,000 Light Years (30 kpc)

Constraints on Extragalactic Background Light from Cherenkov telescopes: status and perspectives for the next 5 years

High Energy Emission. Brenda Dingus, LANL HAWC

Extragalactic DM Halos and QSO Properties Through Microlensing

Jun. Prof. Dr. Alessandro MIRIZZI (Universität Hamburg)

AST Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy. Lecture 20. Black Holes Part II

Multi-Wavelength Observations of PG

Chapter 19 Galaxies. Hubble Ultra Deep Field: Each dot is a galaxy of stars. More distant, further into the past. halo

Diagnostics of Leptonic vs. Hadronic Emission Models for Blazars Prospects for H.E.S.S.-II and CTA Markus Böttcher North-West University

Active Galaxies & Quasars

Astro2010 Science White Paper: Tracing the Mass Buildup of Supermassive Black Holes and their Host Galaxies

BROAD SPECTRAL LINE AND CONTINUUM VARIABILITIES IN QSO SPECTRA INDUCED BY MICROLENSING:METHODS OF COMPUTATION

EBL Studies with the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope

Astronomy 114. Lecture 27: The Galaxy. Martin D. Weinberg. UMass/Astronomy Department

The phenomenon of gravitational lenses

New physics is learnt from extreme or fundamental things

Visible Matter. References: Ryden, Introduction to Cosmology - Par. 8.1 Liddle, Introduction to Modern Cosmology - Par. 9.1

Powering Active Galaxies

Gamma-ray observations of blazars with the Whipple 10 m telescope

Gravitational Lensing. A Brief History, Theory, and Applications

Supermassive Black Holes

The Milky Way Galaxy

Cherenkov Telescope Array ELINA LINDFORS, TUORLA OBSERVATORY ON BEHALF OF CTA CONSORTIUM, TAUP

High-Energy Astrophysics Lecture 6: Black holes in galaxies and the fundamentals of accretion. Overview

Some HI is in reasonably well defined clouds. Motions inside the cloud, and motion of the cloud will broaden and shift the observed lines!

Cosmology and fundamental physics with extragalactic TeV γ-rays?

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 25. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

ASTRONOMY II Spring 1995 FINAL EXAM. Monday May 8th 2:00pm

Chapter 23 The Milky Way Galaxy Pearson Education, Inc.

Quasars and Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)

Observations of Active Galactic Nuclei at very high energies with H.E.S.S.

PHY323:Lecture 7 Dark Matter with Gravitational Lensing

Astrophysics with GLAST: dark matter, black holes and other astronomical exotica

Black Holes in Hibernation

Distance Measuring Techniques and The Milky Way Galaxy

ASTR 2030 Black Holes Fall Homework 2. Due in class Wed Mar 6

Active Galactic Nuclei-I. The paradigm

The Milky Way Galaxy Guiding Questions

The Milky Way Galaxy

Our Galaxy. We are located in the disk of our galaxy and this is why the disk appears as a band of stars across the sky.

Phys333 - sample questions for final

Black Holes Thursday, 14 March 2013

Galaxies and the expansion of the Universe

Exam 4 Review EXAM COVERS LECTURES 22-29

THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT AND THE COSMIC PHOTON OPACITY

(x 2 + ξ 2 ) The integral in (21.02) is analytic, and works out to 2/ξ 2. So. v = 2GM ξc

80 2 Observational Cosmology L and the mean energy

PART 3 Galaxies. Gas, Stars and stellar motion in the Milky Way

Reionization signatures in gamma-ray spectra

The Milky Way Galaxy. Some thoughts. How big is it? What does it look like? How did it end up this way? What is it made up of?

ASTR 200 : Lecture 26. Gravitational Lensing

Astro 242. The Physics of Galaxies and the Universe: Lecture Notes Wayne Hu

OAGH NIR photometric and spectral monitoring program of AGNs. V. Chavushyan, A. Porras, E. Recillas, J. León-Tavares, V. Patiño, A.

Cosmologists dedicate a great deal of effort to determine the density of matter in the universe. Type Ia supernovae observations are consistent with

2. Active Galaxies. 2.1 Taxonomy 2.2 The mass of the central engine 2.3 Models of AGNs 2.4 Quasars as cosmological probes.


arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 23 Dec 2005

The Milky Way Galaxy and Interstellar Medium

AST-1002 Section 0459 Review for Final Exam Please do not forget about doing the evaluation!

Black Holes and Active Galactic Nuclei

Energy Source for Active Galactic Nuclei

Physics of Galaxies 2016 Exercises with solutions batch I

Physics HW Set 3 Spring 2015

Our Galaxy. Chapter Twenty-Five. Guiding Questions

Chapter 14 The Milky Way Galaxy

Active Galaxies and Galactic Structure Lecture 22 April 18th

Astr 2320 Thurs. April 27, 2017 Today s Topics. Chapter 21: Active Galaxies and Quasars

Observational Cosmology

THE STORY OF STRONGLY LENSED JETS AND COSMOLOGY. Anna Barnacka Einstein Fellow at Harvard

Active Galactic Nuclei

Major Option C1 Astrophysics. C1 Astrophysics

The Milky Way, Hubble Law, the expansion of the Universe and Dark Matter Chapter 14 and 15 The Milky Way Galaxy and the two Magellanic Clouds.

Powering the Universe with Supermassive Black Holes. Steve Ehlert and Paul Simeon

NuSTAR observation of the Arches cluster: X-ray spectrum extraction from a 2D image

The Cosmological Redshift. Cepheid Variables. Hubble s Diagram

ASTR Midterm 2 Phil Armitage, Bruce Ferguson

AST1100 Lecture Notes

In a dense region all roads lead to a black Hole (Rees 1984 ARAA) Deriving the Mass of SuperMassive Black Holes

The Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA)

The table summarises some of the properties of Vesta, one of the largest objects in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter.

Special Relativity. Principles of Special Relativity: 1. The laws of physics are the same for all inertial observers.

Lecture PowerPoints. Chapter 33 Physics: Principles with Applications, 7 th edition Giancoli

Orianne ROOS CEA-Saclay Collaborators : F. Bournaud, J. Gabor, S. Juneau

The Milky Way Galaxy

Transcription:

Gravitational light bending prevents gamma-gamma absorption in gravitational lenses NWU, South Africa E-mail: 26559226@nwu.ac.za Markus Böttcher NWU, South Africa E-mail: Markus.Bottcher@nwu.ac.za The magnification effect due to gravitational lensing enhances the chances of detecting moderateredshift (z 1) sources in very-high energy (VHE; E > 100GeV) γ-rays by ground-based Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescope facilities. It has been shown in previous work that this prospect is not hampered by potential γ-γ absorption effects by the intervening (lensing) galaxy, nor by any individual star within the intervening galaxy. In this paper, we expand this study to simulate the light bending effect of a realistic ensemble of stars. We first demonstrate that, for realistic parameters of the galaxy s star field, it is extremely unlikely (probability 10 6 ) that the direct line of sight between the γ-ray source and the observer passes by any star in the field close enough to be subject to significant γγ absorption. Our simulations then focus on the rare cases where γγ absorption by (at least) one individual star might be non-negligible. We show that gravitational light bending will have the effect of avoiding the γ-γ absorption spheres around massive stars in the intervening galaxy. This re-inforces prospects of using VHE γ-ray observations of lensed blazars to probe the location of the γ-ray emission region in those blazars. 4th Annual Conference on High Energy Astrophysics in Southern Africa 25-27 August, 2016 South African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO), Cape Town, South Africa Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/

1. Introduction Very-high energy (VHE; E > 100 GeV) γ-rays are subject to γ-γ absorption from extragalactic background light (EBL) due to electron-positron pair production. The γ-γ absorption effect is further intensified by the dense infrared-optical-uv radiation fields from various celestial objects. The distance at which VHE γ-rays can be detected from sources such as blazars is thus greatly reduced compared to lower energy radiation. As such, VHE γ-ray sources at large cosmological distances are required to be exceptionally bright. However, the magnification effect from gravitational lensing by intervening galaxies may extend the VHE γ-ray visibility of lensed sources to signigicantly larger distances. The most distant source of VHE γ-rays to date is the gravitationally-lensed blazar S3 0218 + 357 [3] at redshift z = 0.944. Figure 1: Schematic representation of γ-rays (black solid lines) being lensed around a star. The absorption radius of the star as blue shaded circle. In the context of a potential VHE detection of a gravitationally-lensed blazar, it is critical to understand whether the additional infrared-optical-uv radiation fields from a lensing galaxy contribute significantly to γ-γ absorption of VHE γ-rays which could effectively nullify the brightness enhancements from gravitational lensing. [1] showed that there is no significant contribution to γ-γ absorption from an individual intervening star or the collective radiation field of the entire galaxy. Due to the gravitational light bending, γ-rays will pass these objects at distances much larger than r γγ 1. Figure 2 illustrates that the γ-γ opacity is negligible even if γ-rays pass through a galaxy. As when considering the effet of an entire galaxy, the point source approximation is no longer valid, the galaxy has been represented as a continuous disc with a de Vaucouleur brightness profile in [1]. This neglects the lensing and potential γ-γ absorption effects of individual stars within the galaxy, which could possibly greatly exceed the effects found with a continuous approximation of the galaxy s gravitational and radiation field. We therefore here extend the study of possible γ-γ absorption effects in gravitational lenses when γ-rays pass through an intervening galaxy, taking into account the contribution from a realistic ensemble of individual stars within the galaxy. This is done by simulating a representative collection of stars in a galaxy and tracing γ-ray paths passing through it. We then evaluate the point 1 the radial distance at which the γ-γ opacity becomes significant; τ γγ > 1. 1

Figure 2: Left: Due to gravitiational light beniding, γ-rays will pass these stars at charactersistic minimum distances of 10 16 10 17 cm, i.e., far outside the stars γ-γ absorption radii. Right: γ-γ opacity as function of impact parameter of γ-rays from Milky-Way like galaxy with effective radius r e = 0.7pc. [1] of closest approach of the γ-rays to each star and compare it to the radii of γ-γ absorption spheres within which significant absorption occurs. A short summary of the numerical scheme and results are presented in the following sections. Details are described in [2]. 2. Numerical Setup The geometrical setup is identical to the schematic in Figure 3. The source, intervening galaxy and observer are collinearly aligned. The disc of the galaxy is seen face-on by the observer. Both the source and the observer are assumed to be a distance of 3Gpc from the lensing galaxy. Figure 3: Schematic representation of γ-rays passing through a galaxy (red shaded disc). The absorption radius of a galaxy (blue shaded circle) as calculated with point source approximation is typically smaller than the galaxy itself. Large lensing deflections will result in γ-rays missing the observer which render the γ-ray path irrelevant. Such deflections are highly unlikely to be realigned by deflections from other stars. 2

Based on the expectation that observed γ-rays will only experience small deflections the simulation volume is restricted to a cylinder parallel to the direct line of sight with radius r = 10ly and height h = 1kpc, comparable to the scale height of a typical galaxy. The expected small-angle deflections justify the approximation of the lensing effect by instantaneous deflections of the γ-ray path by a deflection angle, α α = 4GM c 2 b (2.1) Where G is the universal gravitational constant, M the mass of the star, c the speed of light and b the impact parameter (distance of closest approach). The volumetric star distribution is assumed to be uniform with an average stellar density of n = 10 2 ly 3. The mass distribution is calculated with the Salpeter initial mass fucntion (N(M) M 2.5 ). Low mass stars (M 1M ) do not lead to significant absorption unless the γ-ray pass through the star [1]. Their deflections are also considered to be small enough to ignore. The mass range of the stars used in the simulation then spans 1 M M 100 M. 2 This justifies the reduction of the amount of stars in the simulation to only 250 for the specific volume. [2] show that the probability of finding a star which could cause significant absorption on the direct line of sight is P 10 6. There is thus little risk for a VHE γ-ray travelling along the direct line of sight to pass close enough to a star to be absorbed. For the simulations a star is deliberately placed in the line of sight to test the unlikely worst case. The simulation employs Monte Carlo methods to generate a star profile and then traces the path of a grid of entry positions and directions for the γ-rays through the star profile. The path impact parameters are then calculated and normalised to r γγ of each individual star. Figure 4: Visual representation of an observed γ-ray path (blue line) traced through a collection of stars (red dots). The axes are in units of parsec. [2]. Figure 4 shows the path of a single γ-ray initially travelling along the line of sight through a collection of stars as demonstration of the concept. 2 The initial mass range being 0.08M M 100M 3

3. Results Figure 5 shows the comparison between the impact parameters (normalised to r γγ ) for all of the 250 stars in a representative simulation, of a lensed and unaffected observed γ-ray photon initially travelling along the direct line of sight. 10 2 Lensed 10 1 10 0 10-1 10-1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10 10 2 Unhindered 10 1 10 0 10-1 10-1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10 b/r Figure 5: Histograms of results comparing the normalised impact parameters (b/r) of line of sight (red) to a lensed γ-ray (blue). Data from [2]. The intervening star which has been placed deliberately close to the direct line of sight, is immediately apparent in the histogram of the undeflected γ-ray. The lensed γ-ray has clearly been deflected around this deliberately placed star and avoided the region of significant τ γγ. The absolute minimum normalised impact parameter of the γ-ray path is about 3 orders of magnitude larger than that of the direct line of sight. 8 7 6 Minimum normalised impact parameters Frequency 5 4 3 Figure 6: Histogram for the minimum impact parameters for 100 simulations. Data from [2]. 2 1 0 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 b/r In order to test the robustness of the result presented in Figure 5, we preformed 100 simulations with different random realizations of stellar distributions. Figure 6 shows a histogram of 4

the absolute minimum normalised impact parameter of all the observed γ-rays of each individual simulation. This shows that none of the observed γ-rays passed through low energy radiation fields that could cause significant absorption beyond that of the EBL. This implies that gravitational lenses do not contribute to γ-γ absorption. Globular clusters and O/B associations were added into the simulations to improve their realism. Both cases yielded results identical to Figure 6. All these results confirm that the findings of [1] hold for a representative collection of stars in a galaxy. There is the possibility that supermassive black holes (SMBH) in the centres of intervening galaxies or intermediate-mass black holes may significantly affect both the path and the possible γ-γ absorption within the lens. Given the very small ration of SMBH to total mass, the gravitational effect of the SMBH is expected to play a significant role only within the central few 100pc from the SMBH. If a γ-ray passes within such a small distance of a SMBH, a posible acreation disk and/or broad-line-region radiation field (uf tge SMBH is actively accreting) may cause significant γ-γ absorption. Such effects have been neglected in this study, assuming that the lensed γ-ray path passes far-enough from an active SMBH in the galactic center not to be significantly affected by it. 4. Summary We investigated the claim of [1] that gravitationally lensed VHE γ-rays avoid γ-γ absorption regions within the lens itself and are not subject to excessive γ-γ absorption even in the case where γ-rays pass through a galaxy. By means of ray-tracing simulations, we demonstrated that this result still holds when taking into account a realistic ensemble of stars within the intervening galaxy. This re-inforces the prospects for future VHE γ-ray dtections of gravitationally-lensed blazars at large distances. References [1] A. Barnacka, M. Böttcher, and Iu. Sushch. How gravitational lensing helps γ-ray photons avoid γ-γ absorption. ApJ, 790, 147, 2014. [2] M. Böttcher and H. Thiersen. Gravitational light-bending prevents γγ absorption in gravitational lenses. A&A, 595, A14, 2016. [3] C. C. Cheung, S. Larson, J. D. Scargle, et al. Fermi Large Area Telescope detection of gravitational lens delayed γ flares from blazar B0218+357. ApJ, 782, L14, 2014. 5