Automated analysis: SDSS, BOSS, GIRAFFE

Similar documents
Determination of [α/fe] and its Application to SEGUE F/G Stars. Young Sun Lee

Follow-up observations of EMP stars identified in SDSS and LAMOST

(Present and) Future Surveys for Metal-Poor Stars

JINA Observations, Now and in the Near Future

Introduction to SDSS -instruments, survey strategy, etc

SDSS-IV MaStar: a Large, Comprehensive, and High Quality Empirical Stellar Library

Extremely Metal-Poor Stars

The Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey a lesson for our community in use of limited telescope access. Gerry Gilmore Sofia Randich Gaia-ESO Co-PIs

Galactic Surveys Spectroscopy. Carlos Allende Prieto IAC

The Pristine survey: An efficient search for extremely metal-poor stars. Kris Youakim. ING Seminar Jan 22, 2018

Present and future redshift survey David Schlegel, Berkeley Lab

Back to the Future: The HK Survey of Beers, Preston, & Shectman

Cosmology on the Beach: Experiment to Cosmology

Oxygen in red giants from near-infrared OH lines: 3D effects and first results from. Puerto de la Cruz, May 14, 2012! Carlos Allende Prieto!

Data-driven models of stars

Making precise and accurate measurements with data-driven models

Pre-observations and models

Signatures of Peculiar Supernova Nucleosynthesis in Extremely α-enhanced Metal-poor Stars

Automated Classification of HETDEX Spectra. Ted von Hippel (U Texas, Siena, ERAU)

Chemistry & Dynamics of the Milky Way From Before Hipparcos Until Gaia

金属欠乏星の r プロセス元素組成. r-process abundance of metal-poor stars

Introduction to SDSS-IV and DESI

The Chemical/Dynamical Evolution of the Galactic Bulge

Introduction to the Sloan Survey

Metal Poor Stars: A Review for Non-Observers. Charli Sakari

APOGEE APACHE POINT OBSERVATORY GALACTIC EVOLUTION EXPERIMENT. Jennifer Johnson Ohio State University

SDSS Data Management and Photometric Quality Assessment

Crurent and Future Massive Redshift Surveys

The rise of galaxy surveys and mocks (DESI progress and challenges) Shaun Cole Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, UK

Probing the history of star formation in the Local Group using the galactic fossil record

The Gaia-ESO Spectroscopic Survey. Survey Co-PIs. Gerry Gilmore (IoA, Cambridge) & Sofia Randich (INAF/Arcetri) >300 CoIs

SDSS-IV and eboss Science. Hyunmi Song (KIAS)

Outline. ESA Gaia mission & science objectives. Astrometric & spectroscopic census of all stars in Galaxy to G=20 mag.

Cecilia Fariña - ING Support Astronomer

SkyMapper and the Southern Sky Survey

The Large Sky Area Multi- Object Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST)

SPADES: A STELLAR PARAMETER DETERMINATION SOFTWARE

BigBOSS Data Reduction Software

WEAVE Galactic Surveys

CHEMICAL ABUNDANCE ANALYSIS OF RC CANDIDATE STAR HD (46 LMi) : PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Astronomical image reduction using the Tractor

Radial Velocity Surveys. Matthias Steinmetz (AIP)

From the first stars to planets

SkyMapper and EMP stars

Tests of MATISSE on large spectral datasets from the ESO Archive

Jorge Cervantes-Cota, ININ. on behalf of the DESI Collaboration

PoS(NIC XII)193. Heavy elements in the early Galaxy. Terese Hansen University of Heidelberg, ZAH, LSW

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 19 Jan 2017

Thorium (Th) Enrichment in the Milky Way Galaxy

BUILDING GALAXIES. Question 1: When and where did the stars form?

Studying stars in M31 GCs using NIRI and GNIRS

LSST + BigBOSS. 3.5 deg. 3 deg

Galactic archaeology with the RAdial Velocity Experiment

Francisco Prada Campus de Excelencia Internacional UAM+CSIC Instituto de Física Teórica (UAM/CSIC) Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC)

The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment. Ricardo Schiavon

StePs. Angela Iovino INAF OABrera On behalf of the StePs team*

ASPCAP Tests with Real Data

Stellar populations in the Milky Way halo

Chemical evolution of the Galactic disk using Open Clusters

The Galactic Halo As Seen By The Hamburg/ESO Survey. Judy Cohen (Caltech)

FMOS. A Wide-field Multi-Object Infra-red Spectrograph for the Subaru Telescope. David Bonfield, Gavin Dalton

Gaia News:Counting down to launch A. Vallenari. INAF, Padova Astronomical Observatory on behalf of DPACE

Design considerations for beyond DESI David Schlegel, Berkeley Lab

Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

Milky Way Satellite Galaxies with DES

Classical observations of stellar properties

Observational Constraints on the r-process from Halo r-ii Stars

Reduced data products in the ESO Phase 3 archive (Status: 02 August 2017)

LAMOST Sky Survey --Site limitations and survey planning

Gaia-LSST Synergy. A. Vallenari. INAF, Padova

Today. Lookback time. ASTR 1020: Stars & Galaxies. Astronomy Picture of the day. April 2, 2008

Synergies between and E-ELT

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

From theory to observations

Igor Soszyński. Warsaw University Astronomical Observatory

From quasars to dark energy Adventures with the clustering of luminous red galaxies

ROSAT Roentgen Satellite. Chandra X-ray Observatory

Outline. c.f. Zhao et al. 2006, ChJA&A, 6, 265. Stellar Abundance and Galactic Chemical Evolution through LAMOST Spectroscopic Survey

Halo Tidal Star Streams with DECAM. Brian Yanny Fermilab. DECam Community Workshop NOAO Tucson Aug

From the VLT to ALMA and to the E-ELT

Spectroscopy of giants and supergiants! Maria Bergemann MPIA Heidelberg"

Current Status of Chinese Virtual Observatory

Cat's Eye Nebula, APOD 4 Sep 02, Corradi & Goncalves. Falk Herwig:»Nuclear Astrophysics with Neutron Facilities«MSU - 14 Feb 05

SALT s Venture into Near Infrared Astronomy with RSS NIR

SkyMapper and the Southern Sky Survey

The Binary System VV Cephei Eclipse Campaign 2017/2019 OHP-Meeting July 2017

International Olympiad on Astronomy and Astrophysics (IOAA)

Substructure in the Galaxy

Detailed chemical abundances of M-dwarf planet hosts from APOGEE observations

MARVELS: Revealing the Formation and Dynamical Evolution of Giant Planet Systems

Galactic Projects at ESO Disk and halo. Birgitta Nordström Niels Bohr Institute Copenhagen University Denmark

Data Release 5. Sky coverage of imaging data in the DR5

GOODS/FORS2 Final Data Release: Version 3.0

Extragalactic Astronomy

BigBOSS Instrument + Capabilities. David Schlegel for the BigBOSS collaboration 13 September 2011

Bridging the near and the far: constraints on first star formation from stellar archaeology. Raffaella Schneider Sapienza University of Rome

Real Astronomy from Virtual Observatories

Abundance distribution in the Galactic thick disk

Spectroscopy of M81 Globular Clusters. Julie B. Nantais & John P. Huchra MMT Science Symposium 5/19/10

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Transcription:

Automated analysis: SDSS, BOSS, GIRAFFE Tests with MILES spectra (R~2000) from the INT (Sanchez Blazquez et al. 2006) The same code (FERRE) Fitting data calibrated in flux and continuumnormalized

Software Gaussian LSF (fiber, wavelength) Quadratic interpolation of fluxes Normalization by blocks Successful tests performed on MILES library

Fittings to MILES spectra Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Continuum on This Work MILES parameters (Cenarro et al. 2009) [Fe/H] Teff Distributions of residuals logg

Continuum off This Work MILES parameters (Cenarro et al. 2009) [Fe/H] Teff Distributions of residuals logg

Recent trends in spectroscopic studies 3D model atmospheres: a beginning full NLTE: good progress for hot stars, but Data archival: survey projects going on with massive archives that become public (low-res: SDSS, SEGUE, GALEX) (high-res: Elodie, S4N) Analysis automation: a beginning Breaking the Z barrier

The Desirable future 3D model atmospheres full NLTE A pending observational test for solar-type stars: center-to-limb variation of the solar spectrum Data archival: VOs (including both observations and models) Stronger efforts to measure/compute atomic data Stronger efforts to use the newly available atomic data Full analysis automation R an ignored variable?

Galactic Surveys Other projects and analysis strategies Carlos Allende Prieto IAC

Overview eboss, BigBOSS (DESI), HETDEX, WEAVE, 4MOST Data mashup: astrometry, photometry, spectroscopy Observing Galaxy simulations Discovery and followup of interesting targets: HVS, UMPS, CEMPS, RCrBs Tuesday, August 27, 2013

SDSS BOSS (2009-2014): redshifts for 1.5 million LRG to z=0.7 eboss (2014-2020): extension to larger redshifts using emission-line galaxies Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Kitt Peak 4-m (Mayall) at Kitt Peak, Arizona USA today... Capable of holding heavy corrector 3 deg. field 13

Mayall with BigBOSS Huge Volume of universe with 3-degree field 5000 robotic fiber positioners 10 spectrographs 15 million spectra! 10 spectrographs Dec. 6, 2011 David Schlegel P1 Science Overview

Key of BB Instrument: 5000 Spectra per pointing via Robot Positioners 5000 positioners put fiber at target position positioner focal surface fibe rs Spectrograp Focal Plane filled with positioners

HET

HETDEX

DEX stars simulation from Besançon model Tuesday, August 27, 2013

spectra Tuesday, August 27, 2013

DEX stars analysis (KM stars) Tuesday, August 27, 2013

DEX stars analysis (FG stars) Tuesday, August 27, 2013

WEAVE Tuesday, August 27, 2013

WEAVE Tuesday, August 27, 2013

4MOST Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Data flow CCDs BigBOSS GB/s HETDEX GB/s Gaia GB/s) LSST GB/s single exposure flow 10x(1+4) 0.6 GB 0.0005 75x2 0.8 GB 0.002 100 200 (2 GB) 6 GB (0.1 0.3 LSST will take 30 TB/night and 100 PB in 10

Big data and the cloud Trends are changing in observational astronomy Hand by hand, instrument development and computing are creating a new generation of machines geared to speed up discovery The biggest telescopes are, at least partially, not following that trend

Big data and the cloud Supercomputing is widely embraced for modeling and interpreting the data (plain good-old physics) Virtual observatories are developing quickly to ensure the legacy value of the data High-throughput computing widely adopted for large-scale projects, but only modest use of cloud services (e.g. HETDEX)

Data mashup Typical use of data is concentrating on a specialized data set This must change now with projects such as Gaia Analysis requires combining appropriately different types of data Bayesian statistics offers the framework to a combined analysis of astrometry, photometry and spectroscopy Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Observing simulations Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Observing simulations Tuesday, August 27, et al. 2012 2013 Rahimi

Observing simulations Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Discovery and follow-up of interesting targets HVS LMWD CEMPS RCrBs UMPS Image from J. Norris Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Structure of the halo Johnston & Bullock simulations Monolithic collapse and intensive accretion A dual halo split in rotation and [Fe/H]? Only place in the Galaxy where full orbits and chemistsry are preserved: ideal for stellar archaelogy

Chemical evolution Big bang nucleosynthesis Stellar nucleosynthesis: hydrostatic equilibrium, AGB Explosive nucleosynthesis ISM spallation Also destruction

Early Chemical Evolution Fast enrichment Extremely few stars expected (and found) at [Fe/H] < -4 Large scatter in abundances at [Fe/H]<4

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Figure from Edward L. Wright Chemical abundances of the oldest stars constrain our model of the universe. Large discrepancy between CMB and stellar Li abundances

R-process is universal Sneden et al. 2003 Oldest stars provide pure information on single SN events Nucleosynthesis patterns then and now seem to match in cases The fraction of carbon-rich stars increases at low

Mg/Fe Ca/Fe Only two stars Abundance currently known at ratios [Fe/H]<-5!! Y/Ba Ti/Fe Frebel 2010 Chiappini et al. 2011

Discovery space Preston/Shectman/Beer s Hamburg-ESO survey (Christlieb+) SDSS (Yong et al. 2012, Bonifacio et al. 2012)

Apache Point Observatory New Mexico, USA

BOSS spectra More resolution More spectral coverage More sensitivity Deeeper into the halo Privileged access to IAC >100,000 spectra in

BOSS analysis SEGUE obtained >300,000 stellar spectra Between 2008-2010 SEGUE s pipeline can be used to compare with results from BOSS New analysis for BOSS spectra represents a significant improvement

Discovery process 1. Skim through BOSS database to pick the best candidates to have [Fe/H]<-4 2. Follow those up with higher quality: 4.2m WHT/ISIS, 10m GTC/OSIRIS 3. Investigate those that pass all the filters: 8m ESO/VLT, 10m GTC/OSIRIS, 10m HET/HRS (maybe HORUS)

GTC

HORUS

HORUS-P

HORUS-P

Led-ThAr hollow-cathode lamp 48

Summary Astrometry: Hipparcos, UCAC3, Gaia Photometry: 2MASS, UKIDSS, VHS, SDSS, PanSTARS, GALEX, WISE, LSST Spectroscopy: Various SDSS low-resolution surveys, LAMOST, ARGOS, APOGEE, RAVE, Gaia-ESO, GALAH, DESI, HETDEX, WEAVE, 4MOST, MOONS Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Summary II Data indigestion? Stress should be placed on automated analysis And on a rigurous analysis of combined data (Bayesian framework) Parametric models, increasingly sophisticated, to become a workhorse. Are they Ready? Data can be directly used to determine distribution functions across the Galaxy to be Tuesday, August 27, 2013directly compared with numerical simulations

Conclusions We are living a golden era for the study of the Milky Way Gaia flies at the end of the year, first catalog probably out around 2016 and final catalog around 2020 Now is the time to get ready to use Gaia s data, and in particular to squeeze the information content in the combination of Gaia plus the other spectroscopic surveys Now is the time to sharpen our tools for Tuesday, August 27, automatic analysis and model-based 2013