Inertization Effects on the Explosion Parameters of Different Mix Ratios of Ethanol and Toluene Experimental Studies

Similar documents
Classification and Labelling

DRAIN TRACING DYE RED E123

Flash point of organic binary mixtures containing alcohols: experiment and prediction

I. CHEM. E. SYMPOSIUM SERIES No. 49

11B, 11E Temperature and heat are related but not identical.

CLP Regulation (EC) No / 2008

GHS Classification CONCEPT OF GHS

Chapter 5 Practice Multiple Choice & Free

Sectional Solutions Key

Planet Earth. Topic. Unit 1. Introducing chemistry. Unit 2. The atmosphere. Unit 3. The ocean. Unit 4. Rocks and minerals

PRACTICAL DATA CORRELATION OF FLASHPOINTS OF BINARY MIXTURES BY A RECIPROCAL FUNCTION: THE CONCEPT AND NUMERICAL EXAMPLES

Cracking. 191 minutes. 186 marks. Page 1 of 27

CHEMISTRY HIGHER LEVEL

ASSORTED STOICHIOMETRY PRACTICE PROBLEMS PART I

2SO 2(g) + O 2(g) Increasing the temperature. (Total 1 mark) Enthalpy data for the reacting species are given in the table below.

PROPULSION LAB MANUAL

10 States of Matter. Aubrey High School AP Chemistry. Period Date / / 10.2 Problems - Liquids and Gases

Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Classification criteria for substances and mixtures Physical hazards

Guidelines for the Labelling of Chemical Products

Monitoring Flammable Vapors and Gases in Industrial Processes

Reacting Gas Mixtures

Answer ALL questions

Safety in the Chemistry Laboratory

COMBUSTION OF FUEL 12:57:42

METHANOL SAFE HANDLING TECHNICAL BULLETIN

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

SUPeR Chemistry CH 222 Practice Exam

Hazard Communication for Dangerous and Harmful Materials

10. 2 P R O B L E M S L I Q U I D S A N D G A S E S

Substance Name: 2,2-bis(4'-hydroxyphenyl)-4- methylpentane EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

240EQ031 - Risk and Safety

Safety Assessment Curve (SAC) for Inherent Safety Assessment in Petrochemical Industry

Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) LC-1033p Rev. 06/16

Name Class Date. As you read Lesson 17.1, use the cause and effect chart below. Complete the chart with the terms system and surroundings.

Chemical Safety. Peter Yeung D.G. Manager. Safety Office The University of Hong Kong

Hazard Communication & Chemical Safety. Based on OSHA Standard

Understanding catalytic LEL combustible gas sensor performance

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit State Examinations Commission

An acid made from sulphur, oxygen and hydrogen. A chemical with a ph value. of 8 or more.

Quantity Relationships in Chemical Reactions

Matter is anything that has mass and occupies space. Three physical states of matter

Unit 3: Classification of Hazardous Materials

Page 2. Q1.Which of these substances does not contribute to the greenhouse effect? Unburned hydrocarbons. Carbon dioxide. Water vapour. Nitrogen.

Freezing point depression (Item No.: P )

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, XXX [ ](2015) XXX draft ANNEX 1 ANNEX

5072 CHEMISTRY (NEW PAPERS WITH SPA) TOPIC 3: FORMULAE, STOICHIOMETRY AND THE MOLE CONCEPT

Catalytic bead sensors are used primarily to detect

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Methane contains atoms of two elements, combined chemically. Methane is a mixture of two different elements.

Simplified Criteria for Determining Applicability of Seveso Directive to an Establishment Handling Dangerous Wastes

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Atmospheric Analysis Gases. Sampling and analysis of gaseous compounds

Questions, Myths and Misconceptions about Using Photoionization Detectors

Partial molar volumes (Item No.: P )

C h a p t e r 5 : W o r k p l a c e H a z a r d o u s M a t e r i a l s I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m ( W H M I S )

Exam 1 Spring 2018 BCH Physical Chemistry with a Biological Focus Professor Jeff Yarger

Gases: Their Properties & Behavior. Chapter 09 Slide 1

Fundamentals of Combustion

Stoichiometry Rockets

Chapter 5 Test. Directions: Write the correct letter on the blank before each question.

Chemistry. Matter is anything that has mass and takes up space.

Chemistry Lab Fairfax High School Invitational January 7, Team Number: High School: Team Members Names:

PART 2 PHYSICAL HAZARDS

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, XXX D046374/04 [ ](2016) XXX draft ANNEX 1 ANNEX

Balancing chemical reaction equations (stoichiometry)

Laboratory Safety Rules

This is an author-deposited version published in: Eprints ID: 4499

Chemical Energetics. First Law of thermodynamics: Energy can be neither created nor destroyed but It can be converted from one form to another.

Presentation Start. Zero Carbon Energy Solutions 4/06/06 10/3/2013:; 1

Name: Score: /100. Part I. Multiple choice. Write the letter of the correct answer for each problem. 3 points each

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Chapter 5. Chemistry for Changing Times, Chemical Accounting. Lecture Outlines. John Singer, Jackson Community College. Thirteenth Edition

Higher Chemistry Principles to Production October Revision

HKCEE Past Paper Questions: Part 9 Rate of Reactions Part A: Multiple Choices

HAZARD COMMUNICATION and GHS. Environmental Health and Safety

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Today we re going to talk about understanding chemical labels. Each one of us works with chemicals, whether at work or at home. You need to know how

Gas Chromatography. Presented By Mr. Venkateswarlu Mpharm KTPC

Ideal Gas & Gas Stoichiometry

ST/SG/AC.10/C.3/2012/75 ST/SG/AC.10/C.4/2012/11

Material Safety Data Sheet acc. to ISO/DIS 11014

Hazard Communication 29 CFR Right-To-Know 12 NYCRR Part 820. NYS PESH Training and Education

Vijaykumar N. Nazare

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 84 (2014 )

CTRNet Standard Operating Procedure Handling Hazardous Chemical Waste

THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL CERTIFICATE OF SECONDARY EDUCATION EXAMINATION. Instructions

Substance name: 2,4 - Dinitrotoluene EC number: CAS number: MEMBER STATE COMMITTEE SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

Lecture 11 - Stoichiometry. Lecture 11 - Introduction. Lecture 11 - The Mole. Lecture 11 - The Mole. Lecture 11 - The Mole

COURSE OUTLINE FORM (Page 1 of 8)

and mol of Cl 2 was heated in a vessel of fixed volume to a constant temperature, the following reaction reached equilibrium.

Magnesium nitride reacts with water to form magnesium hydroxide and ammonia.

SECTION 1. Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking. Low Density Polyethylene LF2207M

HazCom and Global Harmonization Are You In Compliance? BISC June, 2018

Heat energy change revision questions

Lesmahagow High School

Transcription:

111 This article is available in PDF-format, in colour, at: www.wydawnictwa.ipo.waw.pl/materialy-wysokoenergetyczne.html Materiały Wysokoenergetyczne / High-Energetic Materials, 2016, 8, 111 117 ISSN 2083-0165 Inertization Effects on the Explosion Parameters of Different Mix Ratios of Ethanol and Toluene Experimental Studies Paulina Flasińska Institute of Industrial Organic Chemistry, 6 Annopol St., 03-236 Warsaw, PL E-mail: flasinska@ipo.waw.pl Abstract: Each flammable substance has a range in which it can be explosively ignited when mixed with air at given temperatures and pressures. For fire or explosion to occur the appropriate amounts of oxidant and flammable substance are necessary at a concentration at least equal to its lower explosive limit. High potential toxicity and flammability of mixtures used in industry can lead to serious harm to people and the environment. Therefore, preventing accidents which can result in fire and/or explosion, is an important factor in the design of chemical processes. For this purpose, a process called inertization can be applied. In this paper the explosion characteristics of mixtures of two solvents: ethanol-toluene is discussed. Explosion parameters were experimentally determined using a closed vessel of 20 l at 120 C and ambient pressure. Results are shown graphically as ternary diagrams with the explosion hazard areas highlighted. Results show importance of inertization in process safety. Keywords: explosion limits, lower explosion limit (LEL), upper explosion limit (UEL), limiting oxygen concentration (LOC), limiting air concentration (LAC) 1. Introduction Each flammable gas or flammable vapour when mixed with air under appropriate conditions, can form an explosive atmosphere. In order to prevent the occurrence of such an atmosphere one must accurately identify potential threats [1]. By analyzing these factors, and identifying potential threats, it is possible to assess whether an explosive atmosphere can be created in the first place. If there is the possibility of fire/explosion, a risk assessment has to be conducted. The risk assessment includes possible effects of an explosion and their minimization. How can the hazard of an explosive atmosphere be minimised? One of the most common methods is through inertization; in other words, the partial or complete replacement of air in a flammable atmosphere with an inert gas. When working with explosive mixtures the limiting oxygen concentration should be determined. Experimentally, the inertization process is examined by determination of the limiting oxygen concentration. Examples of inert gases which decrease the concentration of an oxidant in a flammable mixture are carbon dioxide, argon and nitrogen. Explosion parameters include: Lower and Upper Explosion Limits (LEL and UEL), Limiting Oxygen Concentration (LOC), Limiting Air Concentration (LAC), maximum explosion pressure (p max) and maximum rate of pressure rise ((dp/dt) max). These parameters can be determined experimentally or estimated. In this article the LEL, UEL, LOC are discussed. LEL, UEL: In the past, many explosion properties have been studied using different research methods. One of these is based on reaction stoichiometry, equations (1), (2) and (3) [2]. (1) (2)

112 P. Flasińska where C st is % volume of flammable substance in air. Another method is correlating explosion limits and the heats of combustion. This method was used for organic compounds containing carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and sulfur. The correlation is shown as equations (4) and (5) [2]. UEL = 6.30 Hc + 0.567 Hc22 + 23.5 (5) where LEL and UEL are % volume of flammable substance in air and ΔH c is in 10 3 kj/mol. LOC: LOC is defined as a maximum oxygen concentration of flammable substance in air, at which there is not observed an explosion of the mixture. LOC depends highly on the kind of the inert gas. Its value, as with the value of the explosion limits, is also affected by the process conditions, namely temperature and pressure. LOC can be calculated using the following formula (6) [3]. LOC = z LEL (6) LOC is expressed in mole or percentage volume of oxygen in the mixture. In this paper, results of the experimental studies of the explosion parameters and the effect of inert gas on the explosion range of ethanol-toluene mixtures are described. This knowledge of the explosion parameters is very important in designing equipment in industrial processes and in the explosion risk analysis. Organic solvents are the most common source of fires and explosions and these are widely used in chemical processes [4]. To perform a risk analysis, one should be thoroughly familiar with the explosive characteristics of the substance. Because of the importance of these parameters, the values should be included in each MSDS and safety report. According to CLP Regulations [5] both the solvents under discussion are flammable liquids. Their flash points are below 23 C and the initial boiling points are above 35 C. Hence, ethanol and toluene are in Category 2, according to CLP Regulations. (3) (4) 2. Experimental apparatus and method The experiments were performed in a closed, spherical, stainless steel test vessel of 20 litre internal volume (known as the 20 l Spherical Explosion Vessel). It was designed and constructed by the ANKO company and the Institute of Industrial Organic Chemistry. It includes pressure and temperature sensors, vacuum pump, heating system, stirrer and data logger. The data logger transmission interface was established for recording the explosion pressure time records. The vessel and ancillary equipment is shown in Fig. 1. Using this vessel, it is possible to measure explosion pressures up to 16 bar and to work at temperatures up to 150 C. The ignition source is a fusing wire, placed at the center of the test vessel. This releases between 10 J 20 J of energy. The vessel was set up in accordance with the relevant European standard [6]. LOC determination procedure: This begins with the production of a mixture containing the tested substance, air and inert gas. According to the European standard, the determination is carried out using the PN-EN 14756 standard [3]. To determine the LOC, two methods are recommended: method T and method B, which are described in detail in PN-EN 1839 [6]. The two standards, PN-EN 14756 and PN-EN 1839 are strongly interdependent. Without PN-EN 1839 standard it is not possible to determine the LOC. This paper presents the test results obtained using method B also known as the bomb method. LOC is calculated from the LAC value. The formula describing this relationship is (7) [3]: LOC = 0.209 LAC (7) Determination of the LAC start of the appointment of the apex of the explosion area. To do this, the LEL and UEL must first be determined in accordance with PN-EN 1839. Next, the explosive limit with the mole fraction

Inertization Effects on the Explosion Parameters of Different Mix Ratios... 113 of the test substance x TS = 1.2LEL and variable percentage of air and inert gas is determined. After that, the area around the apex of the explosion area should be investigated by carrying out ignition attempts and changing the amount of the test substance and the constant mole fraction of air (x AIR). Then, the explosion limits should be determined at 0.8x IN. These confirm that the LAC is at the apex of the explosion area. Thus, the determination of the LOC is complete. Figure 1. 20 l spherical explosion vessel The testing was carried out in several steps. To start, the pressure in the test vessel was reduced to below10 mbar. At this pressure, the sample was injected into the vessel. Than nitrogen was added into the vessel up to required pressure. After injection of the sample and required amount of nitrogen, air was injected until atmospheric pressure was obtained in the vessel. The mixture in the vessel was then stirred for 3 min. The gaseous mixture was allowed to stabilize without stirring for 3 min. It was ignited and the data from the pressure sensor were processed by the computer. After the explosion, the vessel was purged with air, opened and cleaned. The aim of this work was to determine the experimental explosion characteristics. The tests for ethanol toluene mixes at different ratios were carried out at ambient pressure. An optimal temperature of 120 C was selected for all of the mix analyzed, thereby ensuring that both solvents were in the vapour state during ignition. 3. Results and Discussion First step of the research was to determine the explosion limits for the various mixes. The results are shown in Table 1. It can be seen that ethanol has got the wider explosion range while that of toluene is narrower. The explosion ranges vary depending on the content of ethanol and toluene. Table 1. Explosion limits for ethanol toluene mixes in different ratios Explosion limits Mixture: ethanol : toluene [mol%] 100:0 70:30 50:50 30:70 0:100 LEL [mol%] 2.6 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.8 UEL [mol%] 22.0 17.8 12.6 10.4 7.6

114 P. Flasińska Knowing the explosion limits, determination of the LOC was started. Firstly, the tests were conducted at x TS = 1.2LEL. Then the inert fraction (x IN) and the air fraction (x AIR) were obtained. With the higher concentration of nitrogen in the mixture, the lower explosion pressure and the lower explosion pressure rise were obtained. The area around the explosion apex was determined by carrying out the tests at concentrations higher by 0.2 mol% and lower by 0.2 mol% than x TS. The obtained pressure values were lower than the criterion value of 0.06 bar which confirmed the correct determination of the apex. After that, the explosion limits were determined at 0.8x IN. All results are presented and compared in Table 2 and are illustrated in the ternary diagrams (Figures 2 6). Table 2. Limiting oxygen concentration determination results 0.8x IN 1.2LEL x IN x AIR Substance or mixture / parameter LEL UEL [mol%] Ethanol 3.20 50.50 46.30 3.2 10.7 Ethanol 70 mol% Toluene 30 mol% 2.04 60.50 37.46 1.8 4.6 Ethanol 50 mol% Toluene 50 mol% 1.68 60.50 37.82 1.3 4.3 Ethanol 30 mol% Toluene 70 mol% 1.32 60.50 38.18 0.9 4.4 Toluene 0.96 60.50 38.54 0.8 3.3 Figure 2. Ternary diagram for toluene

Inertization Effects on the Explosion Parameters of Different Mix Ratios... 115 Figure 3. Ternary diagram for ethanol Figure 4. Ternary diagram for mixture of ethanol 30 mol% : toluene 70 mol%

116 P. Flasińska Figure 5. Ternary diagram for mixture of ethanol 50 mol% : toluene 50 mol% Figure 6. Ternary diagram for mixture of ethanol 70 mol% : toluene 30 mol% The first and most important thing in determining LOC is the correct determination of the apex of the explosion area. Because in the studies of selected substances and mixtures the short procedure was used, the apex of the explosion area determined the value of the LOC [7]. A tangent drawn to the apex determined the explosion area. Thus, the LAC could be read and then on this basis the LOC might be calculated. In Table 3 the values of the LAC are compiled with the corresponding values of the LOC. As can be seen, ethanol yielded the highest LAC and LOC. With an increase in the toluene content in a mixture with ethanol, the values decreased. It is interesting that in the case of ethanol 70 mol% - 30 mol% toluene and ethanol 50 mole% - 50 mole% toluene these values

Inertization Effects on the Explosion Parameters of Different Mix Ratios... 117 are similar. The values for ethanol 70 mole% - 30 mole% of toluene are actually equal to the values for toluene. It can be concluded that the high content of toluene in the mixture results in the LAC and the LOC of the mixture and pure toluene being the same. Table 3. Comparison of LAC and LOC values for ethanol - toluene mixes Substance or mixture / parameter LAC [mol%] LOC [mol%] Ethanol 46.3 9.7 Ethanol 70 mol% Toluene 30 mol% 37.5 7.8 Ethanol 50 mol% Toluene 50 mol% 37.8 7.9 Ethanol 30 mol% Toluene 70 mol% 38.2 8.0 Toluene 38.5 8.0 4. Conclusions Ethanol with toluene is a good combination of solvents due to the formation of an azeotrope. Mixtures of organic solvents are a common source of fires and explosions, which is why this research was undertaken, to model the mixtures of ethanol with toluene and determine their explosive properties. Results of these studies have confirmed that increases of toluene in the mix decreases the molar fraction of the test substance which results in a narrowing of the explosion limits and the entire explosion area. Considering only the results of the LOC determinations, the mixture of ethanol and toluene in ratios 30:70 [%mol/mol] is the least hazardous. Also, by analyzing the explosion parameters and the ternary diagram, this mixture exhibited the narrowest explosion area. At the largest mole fraction of ethanol in the mixture, the value of the LOC is greatly diminished, even to values lower than the LOC of toluene. Because mixtures of organic solvents are very common in industry, results of these tests can be applied to industrial processes in order to make them safer for people and the environment. These experiments can be a prelude to further research in the field of explosive vapours. References [1] Flasińska Paulina, Frączak Michał, Piotrowski Tadeusz. 2012. Explosion hazard evaluation and determination of the explosion parameters for selected hydrocarbons C6 C8. Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater. 9 (4) : 399-409. [2] Crowl A. Daniel, Louvar F. Joseph. 2002. Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications. Second Edition. New Jersey : Prentice Hall PTR, pp. 225-267; ISBN 0-13-018176-5. [3] EN 14756:2007: Determination of Limiting Oxygen Concentration for gases and vapours. European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels. [4] Chang Y.M., Lee J.C., Chen J.R., Liaw H.J., Shu C.M. 2009. Fire and Explosion Properties Examinations of Toluene Methanol Mixtures Approached to the Minimum Oxygen Concentration. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 96 (3) : 741-749. [5] Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. pp. 59-62. [6] EN 1839:2013: Determination of Explosion Limits of Gases and Vapours. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels. [7] Flasińska Paulina. 2014. Influence of inert agents on the explosion parameters of selected gases and vapors of organic liquids. (in Polish) Materiały Wysokoenergetyczne 6 : 46-52. Received: 14 th July 2016 Accepted: 14 th December 2016 Published: 30 th December 2016