Draft PS 18 APPENDIX A Dynamic Spiking Procedure ( ) 1.1 This appendix to Performance Specification 18

Similar documents
Pilot-Plant Performance Testing to Support Development of a Dilution Extractive HCl Monitoring System

Hach Method Total Organic Carbon in Finished Drinking Water by Catalyzed Ozone Hydroxyl Radical Oxidation Infrared Analysis

VALIDATION STUDY OF FTIR-BASED EMISSIONS MEASUREMENTS AT A MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTOR

Validation Study of FTIR-Based Emissions Measurements at a Municipal Waste Combustor

Hach Method Spectrophotometric Measurement of Free Chlorine (Cl 2 ) in Finished Drinking Water

INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF MATERIALS MANAGEMENT. VERIFYING THERMOMETERS ITM No T

METHOD 7B - DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES (ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD)

Hach Company TNTplus 835/836 Nitrate Method Spectrophotometric Measurement of Nitrate in Water and Wastewater

Mercury Stack Monitor SM-4

Colorimetric Method Method to 0.70 mg/l Ag Powder Pillows

Mercuric Thiocyanate Method Method to 25.0 mg/l Cl Reagent Solution

Appendix A - Test Methods Method 301--Field Validation of Pollutant Measurement Methods from Various Waste Media

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

Tetraphenylborate Method Method to 7.0 mg/l K Powder Pillows

DR/4000 PROCEDURE NITRATE. Using Powder Pillows

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 10.0 mg/l NO 3 N (MR, spectrophotometers) 0.2 to 5.0 mg/l NO 3 N (MR, colorimeters)

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Silica in Fresh Waters CCAL 32A.2

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 0.50 mg/l NO 3 N (LR) Powder Pillows

NORTH SEA FLOW MEASUREMENT WORKSHOP 2004 In. St Andrews, Scotland

Chlorphosphonazo Colorimetric Method Method to 1000 µg/l Ca and Mg as CaCO 3 (ULR) Solution Pillow. Instrument Adapter Sample cell

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Instrument Sample cell orientation Sample cell DR 6000 DR 3800 DR 2800 DR 2700 DR 5000 DR The fill line is to the right.

Laboratory ID. Laboratory Name. Analyst(s) Auditor. Date(s) of Audit. Type of Audit Initial Biennial Special ELCP TNI/NELAP.

CHEMISTRY DEPARTMENT

Quality Assurance is what we do to get the right answer for our purpose FITNESS FOR PURPOSE

Scope and application: For water, wastewater and seawater. Distillation is required for wastewater and seawater.

Method 323 Measurement of Formaldehyde Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired Stationary Sources Acetyl Acetone Derivitization Method

Nitrate plus Nitrite and Nitrite in Seawater by Segmented Flow Analysis (SFA)

DR/4000 PROCEDURE NITRATE. 2. The display will show:

METHOD 13B - DETERMINATION OF TOTAL FLUORIDE EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES (SPECIFIC ION ELECTRODE METHOD)

ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE

ABB Measurement & Analytics Applying Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy (CEAS) to trace HCl measurement of coal-fired power plant emissions

Hach Company TNTplus TM Phosphorus Spectrophotometric Measurement of Phosphorus in Water and Wastewater

1,5-Diphenylcarbohydrazide Method* Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls (0 to mg/l Cr 6+ )

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Dissolved Inorganic Carbon CCAL 21A.1

Standard Operating Procedure VUSP M

Nitrogen, Total Inorganic

QUALITY CONTROL CRITERIA FOR CHEMISTRY EXCEPT RADIOCHEMISTRY.

405 Compact Orifice Series and 1595 Conditioning Orifice Plate Flow Test Data Book and Flow Handbook

Developing an Improved Impinger-Based Method for Measuring Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride in Cement and Lime Kiln Emissions

LAP-013. Procedure Title: Date: 6/28/96. Author: Raymond Ruiz and Tina Ehrman ISSUE DATE: 8/26/96 SUPERSEDES: 11/01/94.

Technical Procedure for Measurement Assurance

405 Compact Orifice Series and 1595 Conditioning Orifice Plate Flow Test Data Book and Flow Handbook

FerroZine Method 1 Method to 100 µg/l Fe (10-cm cell) Reagent Solution. Instrument Adapter Sample cell DR 6000 LZV

Determination of Total Bromine and Iodine Emission Spectrometric Method (ICP-OES) EuSalt/AS

Persulfate Digestion Method Method to 25.0 mg/l N (LR) Test N Tube Vials

Persulfate Digestion Method Method to 150 mg/l N (HR) Test N Tube Vials

Powder Pillows 0.01 to 1.60 mg/l SiO 2 (LR, colorimeters)

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Chloride, Bromide and Sulfate in Fresh Waters by Ion Chromatography CCAL 50B.2

Omega Chemicals Emissions Testing Report

Total Dissolved Residue (Total Dissolved Solids, TDS) in Aqueous Matrices

Phosphorus, Total. USEPA 1 PhosVer 3 with Acid Persulfate Digestion Method Method to 3.50 mg/l PO. Test preparation

DR/4000 PROCEDURE. IRON, Total

Chromotropic Acid Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Test N Tube Vials

METHOD 8033 ACETONITRILE BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH NITROGEN-PHOSPHORUS DETECTION

Standard Operating Procedure for the Analysis of Nitrate/Nitrite and Nitrite in Fresh Waters CCAL 31B.1

Liquid Scintillation Counter

429 LIGHT DIFFRACTION MEASUREMENT OF PARTICLE SIZE

Revision: 11 (MBAS) ALLOWAY METHOD OUTLINE. Standard Laboratory Method:

Cadmium Reduction Method Method 8171 MR (0.1 to 10.0 mg/l NO 3

Chromium, Total. Alkaline Hypobromite Oxidation Method 1 Method to 0.70 mg/l Cr (spectrophotometers) 0.01 to 0.60 mg/l Cr (colorimeters)

Standard Operating Procedure VUSP N

405 Compact Orifice Series and 1595 Conditioning Orifice Plate Flow Test Data Book and Flow Handbook

NOTE: This method does not include all of the. specifications (e.g., equipment and supplies) and procedures

University of Tennessee Safety Procedure

DR/4000 QUATERNARY AMMONIUM COMPOUNDS PROCEDURE. 2. The display will show: 3. Fill a sample cell (the blank) with 25 ml of deionized water.

BECKMAN COULTER QbD1200 Total Organic Carbon Analyzer Critical Measurements Made Simple

Method Validation. Role of Validation. Two levels. Flow of method validation. Method selection

VOTING DRAFT STANDARD

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF TESTING AUTHORITIES (NATA) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCREDITATION OF ICP-MS TECHNIQUES

Gaseous CEMS technology

Test Method Development and Validation as Pertaining to Microtrac Particle Size Measuring Instruments

This document is a preview generated by EVS

LAMBTON SCIENTIFIC (A Division of Technical Chemical Services Inc.)

ASTM Designation: D Standard Test Method for Determination of Iodine Number of Activated Carbon

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY SECTOR VOLUME 1 MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LABORATORIES PERFORMING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Oxygen Demand, Chemical

CCME Reference Method for the Canada-Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHC) in Soil - Tier 1 Method

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Aluminum, Potassium, Magnesium, ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE

Performance Characterization of A New Cam System M.J. Koskelo 1, J.C. Rodgers 2, D.C. Nelson 2, A.R. McFarland 3 and C.A. Ortiz 3

Actinides in Human Urine by Alpha Pulse Height Analysis (PHA)

Application of Micro-Flow Imaging (MFI TM ) to The Analysis of Particles in Parenteral Fluids. October 2006 Ottawa, Canada

Certified Reference Material - Certificate of Analysis

Regulatory and Alternative Analytical Procedures are defined as follows 2 :

This document is a preview generated by EVS

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1826 PAGE: 1 of 18 REV: 0.0 DATE: 03/30/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN WIPE SAMPLES BY GC/MS

1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION 2.0 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 3.0 CERTIFIED VALUES AND UNCERTAINTIES. Assay Information:

Method Validation and Accreditation

TNI Standard; EL-V1M4 Sections and (Detection and Quantitation) page1 of 8. TNI Standard VOLUME 1 MODULE 4

Certified Reference Material - Certificate of Analysis Methylone, Primary Standard

HAZARD COMMUNICATION SAFETY PROGRAM

Spectrophotometric Determination of Ferrocyanide in Effluents

Analysis of domestic sludge using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES

Powder Pillows 0.01 to 0.80 mg/l Al 3+ (colorimeters)

HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM

Robustness of the QAL2 calibration (EN 14181) Uncertainty on the results given by a calibrated AMS

á233ñ ELEMENTAL IMPURITIES PROCEDURES

Alkalinity, USEPA by Flow Injection Analysis (FIA)

Timberline Ammonia-001. Determination of Inorganic Ammonia by Continuous Flow Gas Diffusion and Conductivity Cell Analysis

Transcription:

Draft PS 18 APPENDIX A Dynamic Spiking Procedure (4-4-2013) A1. Scope and Application 1.1 This appendix to Performance Specification 18 describes the procedure and performance requirements for dynamic spiking (DS) as a quality check for hydrogen chloride (HCl) CEMS. 1.2 This appendix is applicable to quality checks of both extractive and integrated path technologies used to monitor HCl gas. 1.3 When performed during PS 18 qualification of an HCl CEMS this procedure may be used, as allowed by individual rules or ongoing quality assurance requirements as an alternative to relative accuracy tests with a reference method. A2. Summary of the Appendix for Dynamic Spiking 2.1 Dynamic spiking is a gas phase method of standard additions used to verify the accuracy of CEMS measurement systems in the presence of the sample matrix. It consists of adding a known quantity of HCl into the measurement system, similar to system calibration, except the CEMS sample stream includes the native HCl, the native matrix and the spiked addition of a known quantity of HCl. A3. Definitions. 3.1 Dynamic Spiking (DS) is the procedure where a known concentration of HCl gas is injected into the probe sample gas 1

stream for extractive CEMS at a known flow rate, or spiked into a calibration cell for in-situ IP CEMS in order to assess the accuracy of the measurement system in the presence of the flue gas sample matrix. 3.2 Concentration Factor (CF) is the ratio of the spiking standard concentration to the final stack equivalent concentration at the CEMS. A4. Interferences. Interferences are defined in PS-18, Section 4.0 A5. Safety. The procedures required under this appendix may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This procedure may not address all of the safety problems associated with these procedures. The user is responsible to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicable regulatory limitations prior to performing these procedures. The CEMS users should consult instrument operation manuals, compressed gas safety requirements such as Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations and other material safety data sheets for specific precautions to be taken. A6. Equipment and Supplies. Equipment and supplies for HCl CEMS will vary depending on the measurement technology and equipment vendors. Apply this DS procedure to the equipment used for continuous monitoring of HCl. 2

A7. Reagents and Standards. 7.1 You will need spiking materials meeting the quality requirements defined for calibration standards in PS-18 to perform this procedure. You must use HCl calibration material traceable to a NIST standard. Note: The concentration of standard material required for dynamic spiking may be significantly higher than the span range of your CEMS. A8. Dynamic Spiking Procedure. You must calculate the mean and relative standard deviation for the nine (or more) dynamic spiking measurements to determine CEMS accuracy and compare the average to the specifications in Section 12 of this appendix. 8.1 Target Spiking Level. 8.1.1 You must add the HCl gas spike to measure at least 20 to 40 percent of span after the spike signal has been added to the native signal. 8.1.2 You may not exceed the calibration range above span (CRAS) when the spike and native HCl concentration are combined. 8.1.3 You may perform dynamic spiking with NIST traceable calibration gas, humidified NIST traceable calibration gas, or liquid evaporative HCl gas generation. 8.1.4 You must collect at least 9 sets of independent measurements. 3

8.1.5 You must collect a pre and post-spike background measurement of stack HCl concentration for each spike measurement. Background measurements must be corrected to the dilution affected by the spike additions. 8.2 Extractive CEMS Dynamic Spiking Procedure 8.2.1 Spike Additions. Your spike addition may not alter the total volumetric sample system flow rate or basic dilution ratio of your CEMS (if applicable). 8.2.2 As an alternative you may use an independent continuous monitor, as a temporary unit to measure unspiked stack HCl concentration while simultaneously using the CEMS to measure the spike plus background/native concentration. 8.2.2.1 You must collect independent background measurements using both CEMS and the continuous monitor to confirm the independent continuous monitor measures the same background concentration as the CEMS being qualified with this performance specification. 8.2.3 You must determine correction factor or relative concentration of HCl for each dynamic spike. Since the spiking mass balance calculation is directly dependent on the accuracy of the CF determination, high accuracy is required for total volumetric flow rate, spike gas flow rate, or effective standard addition concentration as applicable to the technology your use. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) traceable 4

flow meters, venturies, and or orifices accurate to within 2 percent or certified tracer gas measurements may be required to make the necessary flow rate determination at the accuracy required for this performance specification. You must document the quantitative uncertainty of flow dilutions using Method 205. 8.2.4 You may add no more than 10 percent of the total volumetric flow rate through the CEMS. 8.2.5 You must introduce the spike gas into the permanent CEMS probe, upstream of the particulate filter or sample conditioning system and as close to the sampling inlet as practical. 8.2.6 You must monitor and record the total sampling system flow rate and sample dilution ratio (if applicable) for the spiking and stack gas sampling systems to ensure they are known and do not change during the spiking procedure. Record all data on a data sheet similar to Table 1 in Section 13 of this appendix. 8.2.6.1 You may either measure the spike gas flow and the total flow with a calibrated flow monitor capable of NIST traceable 2.0 percent accuracy or calculate the flow using a stable tracer gas included in your spike gas standard. 8.2.6.2 If you use flow measurements to determine the spike dilution then use Equation 6 in Section 2 to calculate the CF. Total probe flow measurement requires measurement of HCl 5

spike flow (Q spike ) plus total flow through the CEM sampling system (Q probe ). 8.2.6.3 If your CEMS is capable of measuring an independent stable tracer you may use a spike gas that includes the tracer to determine the CF using Equation 7. 8.2.7 Begin collecting 2 unspiked sample measurements. Measurements must agree within 5 percent to be valid. 8.2.8 Introduce the HCl gas spike into the extractive probe and collect measurement data from the spiked gas stream until sequential measurements are within 5% of each other. 8.2.9 If the spikes persistently show poor repeatability, or if the recoveries are not within the range specified in Section 12 you must take corrective action and repeat the dynamic spiking accuracy procedure. 8.2.10 Repeat the collection of sample measurements in Section 8.2.7 through 8.2.8 until you have nine sets of data. 8.2.11 Calculate the relative accuracy for extractive CEMS as described in Section 11.2.1 of this appendix. 8.3 Dynamic Spiking Procedure for IP CEMS. 8.3.1 For IP CEMS you must spike a known quantity of calibration gas into a calibration cell that is in the optical path used to make CEMS source measurements. 8.3.2 Use calibration gas at a concentration that produces a signal equivalent to 20 to 40% of the span. 6

8.3.3 Sequentially introduce certified zero gas and the calibration standard into a permanently mounted calibration cell located in the optical measurement path of the instrument. 8.3.3.1 Continue to flush the zero gas or the standard into the cell until two consecutive measurements taken are within 5 percent. Then collect 2 independent sample measurements. 8.3.4 Repeat the collection of sample measurements in Section 8.3.3 until you have nine sets of data. Measured concentrations must be corrected for calibration cell temperature, pressure, and path length. 8.3.5 Calculate the relative accuracy for extractive CEMS as described in Section 12 of this appendix. 8.3.6 If the spikes persistently show poor repeatability, or if the recoveries are not within the range specified in Section 12 of this appendix you must take corrective action and repeat the dynamic spiking accuracy procedure. A9. Quality Control (Reserved) A10. Calibration and Standardization (Reserved) A11. Calculations and Data Analysis 11.1 Variable Definitions = Actual HCl standard gas concentration spiked (e.g., bottle or standard gas concentration)ppmv, 7

Ctracer spiked = Tracer gas concentration injected with spike gas ( standard concentration )ppmv, DF = Spiked gas dilution factor = Average measured pre- and post-run system calibration check for the zero gas (ppmv), baseline = Average measured baseline HCl concentration before and after spiking (ppmv), = Average measured pre- and post-run calibration check responses for high-level calibration gas, ppmv. = Measured concentration of the spiked HCl sample gas (ppmv), = Average measured concentration of the native HCl (ppmv), MT native = Measured tracer gas concentration present in native effluent gas (ppmv), spiked sample (ppmv), = Measured diluted tracer gas concentration in a Q spike Q probe S %SA %SR ave %SR i = Flow rate of the dynamic spike gas (Lpm), = Average Total flow through the system (Lpm), = Span = Spike recovery accuracy (percent) = Mean dynamic spike recovery (percent), = Dynamic spike recovery (percent) 8

11.2 Calculating Recovery using Dynamic Spiking Test Data Calculate the spike recoveries for each injection and its associated pair of native HCl measurements, using Equations in Section 11 of this appendix. Note: For cases where the emission standard is expressed in units of lb/mm Btu or corrected to a specified O 2 or CO 2 concentration, an absolute accuracy specification based on a span at stack conditions may be calculated using an average concentration and applicable conversion factors. The appropriate procedures for use in cases where a percent removal standard is more restrictive than the emission standard are the same as in 40 CFR Part 60 PS-2, Section 12 and 13. 11.2.1 Dynamic Spike Recovery for Extractive CEMS. 11.2.1.1 If you determine your spike dilution factor using spike and sample flow measurements calculate the dilution factor for dynamic spiking accuracy tests based using Equation 6: Eq. 6 11.2.1.2 If you determine your spike dilution factor using an independent stable tracer that is not present in the native source gas, calculate the dilution factor for dynamic spiking using Equation 7: Eq. 7 9

11.2.1.3 If you determine your spike dilution factor using an independent stable tracer that is present in the native source gas, calculate the dilution factor for dynamic spiking using equation 8: Eq. 8 11.2.1.4 Calculate the C expected using equation 9. ( ) Eq. 9 11.2.1.5 Calculate the percent spike recovery (SR i ) between the CEMS results and the reference concentration for each spiked sample measurement using Equation 10. Eq. 10 11.2.1.6 You must calculate the mean of the recovery for the six (or more) dynamic spikes using Equation 11. % Eq. 11 11.2.1.7 You must calculate the standard deviation for the six (or more) dynamic spiking measurements to determine CEMS accuracy using Eq. 12. ( ) Eq.12 11.2.1.8 Calculate the confidence coefficient, (CC) for the relative accuracy tests using Eq. 13. ( ( ) ) Eq. 13 10

11.2.1.9 Calculate the spike recovery accuracy (SA) for the CEMS using equation 14. ( ) Eq. 14 11.2.2 DS Recovery for IP CEMS 11.2.2.1 If you use an in-situ IP-CEMS and a calibration cell, calculate and substitute the equivalent concentration C ieff for C i using equation 4: [ ] Eq. 4 11.2.2.2 Calculate the percent spike recovery (%SR i ) between the CEMS results and the reference concentration for each spiked sample measurement using Equation 10. ( ) Eq. 10 11.2.2.3 Calculate the average spike recovery (SR avg ) using Equation 11. Eq. 11 11.2.2.4 Calculate the standard deviation for the six (or more) dynamic spiking measurements to determine CEMS accuracy using Equation. 12. ( ) Eq.12 11

11.2.2.5 Calculate the confidence coefficient, (CC) for the spiking accuracy using Equation 13. ( ( ) ) Eq. 13 11.2.2.6 Calculate the relative spike recovery accuracy (%SA) for the IP CEMS using Equation 14. [( ) ] Eq. 14 11.2.2.7 If the spike recovery analysis passes the validation criteria, then the accuracy evaluation is completed. A12. Performance Requirements DS Spike Accuracy Check 12.1 The accuracy (SA) of the average CEMS results from 9 runs calculated using equation 5 for extractive CEMS or equation 14 for integrated path CEMS in the units of HCl concentration (ppm)must be less than or equal to 10 percent of spiked sample concentration. 12

Table 1.Spike Recovery Work Sheet Facility name: Date: Time: Unit(s) tested: Test personnel: Analyzer make and model: : Serial number: Calibration range above span: 6.0 Q probe (lpm) Q spike (lpm) CF 1 C native Actual Values SR 2 Pre Post Avg C i (ppmv) 3 MC ss (ppmv) (% Spike Recovery) Average SD 1 CF must be 10 for extractive CEMS 2 C i = Actual HCl concentration of the spike gas, ppmv. 3 MCss = Measured HCl concentration of the spiked sample at the target level, ppmv. 13