Karyomorphological Study of Vetiver Germplasm in Thailand P. Kongprakhon, N. Sangduen and K. Namwongprom* Department of Genetics, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University Bangkok, Thailand Abstract A cytological technique was developed to display chromosome morphology from the root tip cells of 15 ecotypes of vetiver collected from all over Thailand. They were classified as eight Vetiveria zizanioides and seven V. nemoralis. Humic acid solution was applied to obtain healthy root tips used for conventional slide preparation. The appropriate times for cutting the root tips were between 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. for further fixation. Enzyme mixture treatment appeared to be a promising way to separate groups of cells and to clear the cytoplasm. It was found that all ecotypes studied had the same chromosome number, 2n = 2x =. Three B-chromosomes were observed only in one ecotype. The variation in satellite chromosomes in terms of number and morphology was evident in six ecotypes. The total chromosome length varied from 1.8-8.4 µm. The karyotype consisted of metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes, all of which were nearly symmetrical. Localization of the heterochromatic regions on the chromosome of vetiver was achieved by: (a) modified C-band, and (b) N-band. It was possible to characterize each pair of the vetiver chromosomes. All ten pairs of chromosomes were identified by these banding patterns, along with their length and arm ratios. They can be used as the basis for reproducible karyotypes and for detecting chromosomal relationships among ecotypes. Each ecotype showed at least one chromosome with a whole dark band, indicating a constitutive heterochromatin. The remainder indicated variation patterns from ecotype to ecotype of some faint and dark bands. Keywords: Cytological technique, karyotype, ecotype, chromosome morphology, banding pattern, heterochromatin, metacentric chromosome, satellite chromosome, B-chromosome, C-band, N-band. Introduction Vetiver is known as a miracle plant because it possesses many beneficial characteristics and versatile uses especially in soil and water conservation and erosion control. Although vetiver is generally known to have originated in India, it is also found widely distributed naturally in all part of Thailand. From the result of recent botanical exploration, it was concluded that there are two species of vetiver in Thailand, namely Vetiveria zizanioides Nash. and V. nemoralis A. Camus. The ecological difference between the two is so clear cut that the former is commonly called the lowland vetiver ( Faek Hom in Thai), and the * Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand latter, the upland vetiver ( Faek Don in Thai) (Chomchalow 1998). Both species of Thai vetiver possess distinct genetic variations that make them adaptive to their different habitats. The term germplasm is used here to designate genetic constitutions of all the ecotypes of vetiver. Ecotype is defined as a population of plants whose origin is derived from a given habitat, area or region, e.g. in swamp, in meadow, along the beach, on high mountain, in acid sulfate soil, etc. (Chomchalow 3). In Thailand, they were assigned the provincial names from which they were first found, e.g. Surat Thani, Loei, Roi Et. 75
Due to the small size of the chromosomes, it is difficult to obtain healthy reported nuclear DNA and karyomorphology of cultivars of V. zizanioides of India. Since these chromosomes were small and frequently difficult to distinguish, the modified C-banding technique and the N-banding were applied to each ecotype of vetiver, to determine the banding patterns of the chromosome complement and to facilitate reproducible karyotypes. This study was conducted to obtain an appropriate cytological technique and banding patterns as the basis for the identification of all ten pairs of chromosome of the vetiver germplasm in Thailand. Materials and Methods Fifteen ecotypes of vetiver germplasm collected from different geographical areas in Thailand, and are maintained at Kasetsart University Chalermphrakiat Sakon Nakhon Province Campus and Ratchaburi Land Development Station, were used in the present study. Each ecotype was put to root in a solution of humic acid for 2-3 days. Root tips were collected when the roots were 1 to 1.5 cm long and the appropriate times for root cutting were between 11-12 a.m. They were excised and pretreated in.2% colchicine at 12-14 o C for 5 hr, then fixed in a freshly prepared 95% ethanol-acetic acid (3:1 V/V) for 24 hr and stored in 7% ethanol. Chromosome preparation was made by enzymatic maceration and air-dried method (Fukui and Nakayama 1996). Then, root apices were rinsed with distilled water, stained and macerated in 2% aceto-orcein for 5-7 min. For identification of the chromosomes, specimens with well spread chromosomes were photographed. Chromosome lengths and arm ratios were measured from at least ten cells and averaged. The lengths of the chromosomes were then measured from the pictures taken and converted into actual lengths according to the magnification. The number and size of satellites and B-chromosome were recorded. For banding, the fixed root tips were stained in 1% aceto-carmine for 1-2 hr. at room and dividing root-tip cells, thus its cytological studies are scarce. Only Lavania (1985) temperature and squashed in 45% acetic acid. The cover glass was removed by freezing method for further banding technique. (a) N-banding: The preparations were treated with 45% acetic acid at 5 o C for 5-1 min. and air-dried overnight. The slides were then incubated in hot phosphate buffer (1 M NaH 2 PO 4 ) at 94 o C for 2 min., washed thoroughly in running tap water, and air-dried. They were stained with 5% Giemsa solution for 1-15 min., rinsed briefly in tap water and air-dried. (b) Modified C-banding: The preparations were treated in a saturated barium hydroxide solution at 5 o C for 2.5 min., and rinsed in tap water. The slides were incubated in 2xSSC (.3 M sodium chloride and.3 M trisodium citrate) at 5 o C for 3-1 min. and rinsed in tap water. The wet slides were stained with 5% Giemsa solution for 15- min., rinsed briefly in tap water and air-dried (Gill, et al. 1991). Results and Discussion The appropriate times of root tips cutting were between 11 a.m.-1 p.m., and then humic acid solution was applied to increase root size, vigor root tips, and cell division. Enzyme mixture treatment appeared to be a promising way to separate group of cells to clear the cytoplasm. Chromosome number obtained from mitotic division, number of satellite, and karyotype formulae from various ecotypes were presented in Table 1, and also illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. The chromosomes of all ecotypes of vetiver germplasm studied belong to the small category according to Lima de Faria (198), because their length ranged between 1.8-8.4 µm. Karyotype morphology, including chromosome length, centromere position and ratio, secondary constriction and staining properties, was analyzed for 15 vetiver ecotypes belonging to two species of Vetiveria, V. zizanioides and V. nemoralis. The lengths of the chromosomes of the six ecotypes of V. zizanioides and the nine ecotypes of V. nemoralis were 1.8-7.8 µm, and 1.8-8.4 µm, respectively. The range of the chromatin length varied from 1.8-8.4 µm. The 76
ecotypes Prachuap Khiri Khan had the longest chromosomes, whereas Kamphaeng Phet 1 and Songkhla 3 were characterized with shorter chromosomal complement. Other characteristics such as variation in chromosome length within species, satellite number and size, constrictions and centromere placements, were used to differentiate the ecotypes. B-chromosomes that are distinctly smaller than A-chromosome, arising by misdivision, betray their origin by varying in number at mitosis in the root. After misdivision their centromeres are of insufficient strength for regular movement in somatic mitosis (Darlington 1973) Vetiver karyotypes consisted of metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes. The karyotype patterns of all ecotypes studied were nearly symmetrical (Table 1). Based on the number of satellites and B-chromosomes, the karyotypes were grouped into three categories of haploid complements, namely: (1) Ecotypes with 1-2 satellite chromosomes, e.g. Surat Thani, Loei, Chiang Mai, Chaiyaphum, Songkhla 3, Mae Hong Son, and Saraburi 2. (2) Ecotypes with 3 B-chromosomes, e.g. Roi Et. (3) Ecotypes without satellite and B- chromosome, e.g. Chiang Rai, Trang 2, Kamphaeng Phet 1, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Songkhla 1, Songkhla 2, and Saraburi 1. Fig. 1. Metaphase cell of vetiver ecotypes, (a) Surat Thani, (b) Roi Et, (c) Chaiyaphum, and (d) Songkhla 2 = satellite chromosome, = B chromosome Localization of the heterochromatic regions on the chromosomes of vetiver was achieved by: (a) modified C-banding, and (b) N-banding. It is possible to characterize each pair of the vetiver chromosomes. The absence of heterochromatin at the telomeric region and its presence in the centromeric region served as markers and facilitated easy identification of vetiver chromosomes from those of haploid genome. Nevertheless, individual chromosomes 77 could be depicted and characterized by using a combination of chromosome length, arm ratio (Table 2), and their modified C-banding pattern. According to their degree of asymmetry, the karyotypes of all ecotypes studied were classified in the category 1B (Stebbins 1971). They can be used as the basis for making reproducible karyotypes and detecting chromosomal relationships among ecotypes.
Haploid complement of each ecotype showed at least one chromosome with a whole dark band, indicating a constitutive heterochromatin. B-chromosome showed a whole dark band indicating a constitutive heterochromatin. The remainder indicated variation patterns of some faint and dark bands from ecotype to ecotype. 5µm 5µm 1a 1b 1a 1b 5µm 5µm 2a 2b 2a 2b 5µm 5µm 3a 3b 3a 3b Fig. 2. Chromosome banding of three vetiver ecotypes: (1) Chaiyaphum, (2) Saraburi 2, (3) Roi Et (a) modified C-band, (b) N-band References Chomchalow, N. 1998. Amazing Thai Vetiver. FAO/RAP Publ. No. 1998/4, and Office of the Royal Development Projects Board, Bangkok, Thailand. Chomchalow, N. 3. Vibrant Versatile Vetiver: An Archive of Useful Information on Vetiver. PRVN Special Bull. No. 3/1, Office of the Royal Development Projects Board, Bangkok, Thailand. Darlington, C.D. 1973. Chromosome Botany and the Origins of Cultivated Plants. George Allen & Unwin, London, UK. Fukui, K.; and S. Nakayama. 1996. Plant Chromosome: Laboratory Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. Gill, B.S.; Friebe, B.; and Endo, T.R. 1991. Standard karyotype and nomenclature system for description of chromosome bands and structural aberrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Genome 34: 83-9. Lavania, U. C. 1985. Nuclear DNA and karyomorphological studies in vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides L.) Nash. Cytologia 5: 177-85. Stebbins, G.L. 1971. Chromosome Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold Publ., London, UK. 78
Table 1. Location of collection, 2n chromosome, number of satellites, and karyotype formulae for 15 vetiver ecotypes of Thailand Surat Thani Z Chiang Rai Z Chiang Mai Z Chaiyaphum N Trang 2 N Ecotypes 2n No. of satellite Kamphaeng Phet 1 N Roi Et N Prachuap Khiri Khan N Loei N Songkhla 1 Z Songkhla 2 Z Songkhla 3 Z Mae Hong Son N Saraburi 1 N Saraburi 2 N +3b 2 2 1 1 1 2 Karyotype formulae 1MstB+3MC+1MstD+3MD+1SmC+1SmC 4MC+4MD+2SmD 1MB+1MstC+1SmC+1SmstC+4MD+1SMD 1MB+5MC+1MstC+1SmC+2MD 2MB+4MC+4MD 2MC+7MD+1ME 1MB+2SmC+1MC+5MD+1SmD+3b 1MA+3MB+1SmC+5MC 1MB+3MC+1MstC+2SmC+3MD 1SmB+1MB+2MC+5MD+1SmD 2MC+1SmD+7MD 2MC+5MD+1SmD+1SmstD+1ME 3MC+1SmD+6MD 1SmB+1MB+8MC 1MstB+2MC+3SmC+1SmD+1MstD+2MD Legend: Z = lowland vetiver, N = upland vetiver M = metacentric chromosome, Sm = submetacentric chromosome, st = satellite chromosome b = B-chromosome A = chromosome size 8 µm, B = chromosome size 6-8 µm, C = chromosome size 4-6 µm D = chromosome size 2-4 µm, E = chromosome size 2 µm 79
Table 2. Karyotype detail of vetiver germplasm in Thailand Ecotypes V TLC C R TF% S% CI L/S CV% Surat Thani Chiang Rai Chiang Mai Chaiyaphum Trang 2 Kamphaeng Phet 1 Roi Et Prachuap Khiri Khan Loei Songkhla 1 Songkhla 2 Songkhla 3 Mae Hong Son Sara Buri1 Sara Buri2 3.-6.6 2.4-5.4 2.4-6.6 2.4-6. 2.4-6.6 1.8-5.4 3.7-6.3 4.8-8.4 3.3-6. 2.7-7.8 2.7-5.7 1.8-5.7 2.4-5.7 3.6-6.9 3.9-7.2 41.4 37.2 38.7 41.4 43.2 33.9 4.9 59.4 44.4 45.4 36. 36.6 34.7 49.8 48 4.14 3.72 3.87 4.14 4.32 3.39 4.9 5.94 4.44 4.54 3.6 3.66 3.47 4.98 4.8 1.22 2.23 1.23 1.27 1.15 1.13 1.19 1.25 1.28 1.3 1. 1.23 1.17 1.17 1.49 44.93 43.55 48.6 44. 46.53 46.9 44.74 44.44 44.6 43.6 45.83 45.8 43.92 45.78 4.62 36.36 44.44 36.36 4. 36.36 33.33 58.73 57.14 55. 34.62 47.37 31.58 42.1 52.17 54.17 5.45 5.46 5.45 5.24 5.46 5.26 5.42 5.48 5.6 5. 5.39 5.4 5.32 5.34 5.77 2.75 2.25 2.75 2.5 2.75 3. 1.7 1.75 1.8 2.89 2.1 3.17 2.37 1.92 1.85 16.93 9.17 11.52 9.28 18.82 15.86 13.23 5.43 11.21 9.33 14.44 1.8 9.71 5.87 6.15 V = range of chromosome length variation, TLC = total length of chromosomes, C = mean of chromosome length, R = mean of long arm over short arm ratio, CI = centromere index, CV = coefficient of variation TF% = total sum of short arm length divide by the sum of chromosome length x 1 S% = length of the shortest chromosome in the complement divide by the length of the longest chromosome in the complement x 1 8