Some Aspects of the 2005 Ozone Season

Similar documents
PM 2.5 Forecasting: Preliminary Results

8.1 THE EFFECT OF RECENT REGIONAL EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS ON AIR QUALITY FORECASTING IN THE MID-ATLANTIC

End of Ozone Season Report

Central Ohio Air Quality End of Season Report. 111 Liberty Street, Suite 100 Columbus, OH Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission

Appendix G-5: The Low Level Jet in Maryland: Profiler Observations and Preliminary Climatology

Preliminary Experiences with the Multi Model Air Quality Forecasting System for New York State

Recent Performance of the NOAA Air Quality Forecasting Capability and the Impact of Driving Meteorology

1 INTRODUCTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MODELS. In 1989, two models were able to make smog forecasts; the MPA-model and

Heavy Rainfall and Flooding of 23 July 2009 By Richard H. Grumm And Ron Holmes National Weather Service Office State College, PA 16803

1. INTRODUCTION * Figure 1. National Weather Service Storm Prediction Center (SPC) storm reports for December 1, 2006.

AREP GAW. Section 14 Daily Air Quality Forecast Operations

New Generation Aerosol Satellite Products for Air Quality Mapping and Analysis

Heavy Rainfall Event of June 2013

Using Convection-Allowing Models to Produce Forecast Guidance For Severe Thunderstorm Hazards via a Surrogate-Severe Approach!

Hurricanes. April 14, 2009

UPDATE OF REGIONAL WEATHER AND SMOKE HAZE (September 2017)

Fronts in November 1998 Storm

Analysis of PM10 measurements and comparison with model results during 2007 wildfire season

Fog and Icing Occurrence, and Air Quality Factors. for the Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan John Merrill

The Weather Wire. Contents: Summer 2018 Outlook. Summer 2018 Outlook Drought Monitor May Summary/Statistics June Preview Rainfall Totals

NIWA Outlook: October - December 2015

Christopher ISU

Ice Age Forcings Imply Global Climate Sensitivity ~ ¾ C per W/m 2. Source: Hansen et al., Natl. Geogr. Res. & Explor., 9, 141, 1993.

BIAS-ADJUSTMENT TECHNIQUES FOR IMPROVING OZONE AIR QUALITY FORECASTS. US Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC 27711, USA

Appalachian Lee Troughs and their Association with Severe Thunderstorms

Performance of TANC (Taiwan Auto- Nowcaster) for 2014 Warm-Season Afternoon Thunderstorm

Determination of Planetary Boundary Layer Heights on Short Spatial and Temporal Scales from Surface and Airborne Vertical Profilers during DISCOVER AQ

ESCI 241 Meteorology Lesson 19 Tropical Cyclones Dr. DeCaria

Extracting probabilistic severe weather guidance from convection-allowing model forecasts. Ryan Sobash 4 December 2009 Convection/NWP Seminar Series

The Pennsylvania Observer

KUALA LUMPUR MONSOON ACTIVITY CENT

UPDATE OF REGIONAL WEATHER AND SMOKE HAZE (May 2017)

Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback

The climate change penalty on US air quality: New perspectives from statistical models

Percentage of normal rainfall for August 2017 Departure from average air temperature for August 2017

Toward improved initial conditions for NCAR s real-time convection-allowing ensemble. Ryan Sobash, Glen Romine, Craig Schwartz, and Kate Fossell

Application and verification of the ECMWF products Report 2007

1. INTRODUCTION. In addition to the severe weather, the

FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ (July/August 2014) in perspective of multi-year ozone analysis

Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL January 13, 2015

CASE STUDY OF THE NOVEMBER WINDSTORM IN SOUTH CENTRAL COLORADO

Denver International Airport MDSS Demonstration Verification Report for the Season

NOAA 2015 Updated Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook

P2.9 Use of the NOAA ARL HYSPLIT Trajectory Model For the Short Range Prediction of Stratus and Fog

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2016

Average Weather For Coeur d'alene, Idaho, USA

NOAA s National Weather Service Philadelphia/Mt. Holly NJ. Summary. Changes

3.4 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RAPID TRANSPORT OF CANADIAN WILDFIRE PRODUCTS INTO THE NORTHEAST DURING 5-8 JULY 2002

Hurricanes and Tropical Weather Systems:

Forecasting Extreme Events

Climate Outlook and Review

1. What type of wind is needed for a hurricane to form? Low to medium winds, blowing in the same direction (weak wind shear).

PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCES WITH THE MULTI-MODEL AIR QUALITY FORECASTING SYSTEM FOR NEW YORK STATE

Combining Deterministic and Probabilistic Methods to Produce Gridded Climatologies

Conceptual Model for Ozone in the Austin-Round Rock Metropolitan Statistical Area

Application and verification of ECMWF products: 2010

UPDATE OF REGIONAL WEATHER AND SMOKE HAZE (December 2017)

Weather Briefing Mixed Winter Storm Event February 26-27, 2013

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2014

Type of storm viewed by Spotter A Ordinary, multi-cell thunderstorm. Type of storm viewed by Spotter B Supecell thunderstorm

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 25 February 2013

Application and verification of ECMWF products in Norway 2008


Heavy rains and precipitable water anomalies August 2010 By Richard H. Grumm And Jason Krekeler National Weather Service State College, PA 16803

2016 Meteorology Summary

Air Quality Modelling for Health Impacts Studies

7.5 THE EFFECTS OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL SCALE CIRCULATIONS ON AIR POLLUTANTS DURING NARSTO-NE-OPS

Satellites, Weather and Climate Module??: Polar Vortex

NOAA-EPA s s U.S. National Air Quality Forecast Capability

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FROM AUGUST 4-17, 2015

Creating Meteorology for CMAQ

DATA FUSION NOWCASTING AND NWP

DEPARTMENT OF EARTH & CLIMATE SCIENCES Name SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY Nov 29, ERTH 360 Test #2 200 pts

SNOW COVER MAPPING USING METOP/AVHRR AND MSG/SEVIRI

6.10 CHARACTERIZATION OF NOCTURNAL JETS OVER PHILADELPHIA DURING AIR-POLLUTION EPISODES

Climate Outlook through 2100 South Florida Ecological Services Office Vero Beach, FL September 9, 2014

Use of Seasonal forecasts in Electrical Load Prediction

Northeastern United States Snowstorm of 9 February 2017

Monthly overview. Rainfall

Will a warmer world change Queensland s rainfall?

Climate Outlook and Review Focus on sugar industry requirements. Issued 1 October Roger C Stone

AQRP Monthly Technical Report

A LOOK AT TROPICAL STORM GASTON FLOODING IN VIRGINIA

The Hungarian Meteorological Service has made

Weather and Climate Summary and Forecast Summer 2017

Severe storm forecast guidance based on explicit identification of convective phenomena in WRF-model forecasts

Seasonal Variations of the Urban Heat Island Effect:

How far in advance can we forecast cold/heat spells?

Stability in SeaWinds Quality Control

THE ATMOSPHERE IN MOTION

Atmospheric Circulation

2/20/2013. Meteorology and Climatology 101. Why do we have weather? MARAMA Webinar February 21, 2013

Seasonal Climate Watch July to November 2018

Allison Monarski, University of Maryland Masters Scholarly Paper, December 6, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science

Hyperlocal Marine Weather: What s Happening?

A Study of Long Range Transport of Ozone and Aerosols to the San Joaquin Valley

Addendum to the. Submitted to U.S. EPA Region 9 March 17, Prepared by:

UPDATE OF REGIONAL WEATHER AND SMOKE HAZE (February 2018)

Application and verification of ECMWF products 2010

ENSO Cycle: Recent Evolution, Current Status and Predictions. Update prepared by Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 5 August 2013

Transcription:

Some Aspects of the 2005 Ozone Season William F. Ryan Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University 2005 MARAMA Monitoring Committee Meeting Ocean City, Maryland November 15-17, 2005

Three Topics of Interest Was 2005 a typical summer O 3 season? Is it enough to just be hot? Are O 3 concentrations falling in response to regional NO x controls? Is the ground moving under our feet? Improvements in O 3 forecast capability. Now a reliable forecast tool?

Philadelphia Mean Daily Peak O 3 80 Mean Daily 8-h Ozone (ppbv) 75 70 65 60 2005 mean is 5 ppbv (~ 8%) lower than the 1994-2002 average 55 50 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year

Philadelphia O 3 Concentrations by Color Code Orange 16% Red 5% Orange 10% Red 4% Green 48% Green 53% Yellow 33% Yellow 31% 1994-2004 2005 In 2005, less Code Orange and more Code Green

18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Frequency of Code Red Days Philadelphia Code Red Ozone (1994-2005) 2005 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Year 1994 Number of Days

Frequency of Days 85 ppbv Philadelphia Red and Orange (1994-2005) 60 50 Number of Code Orange or Red days in 2005 is 45% less than 1994-2002 40 Number of Days 30 20 10 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year

But It Was a Hot Summer..

Hot Even by Recent Standards

Hot and Dry.Usually Means Bad Air

Is Hot Weather Enough for High O 3? Average maximum temperature for Code Red cases in Baltimore (1990-2000) is 93 F For PHL average maximum temperature is also 93 F (1994-2004) Count 30 20 10 0 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 100 102 BWI Hourly Maximum Temperature (F) 104 0.2 0.1 0.0 Proportion per Bar

Hot Days Very Frequent in 2005 45 40 35 Number of Days >= 90 F 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Hot Weather is Necessary but not Sufficient for Code Red though usually for Code Orange Only 30% of all cases where maximum temperature reaches or exceeds 90 F reach the Code Red threshold. Count 250 200 150 100 All Cases Code Red Cases 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 Value For PHL ~ 29% of hot days are Code Red but 74% are at least Code Orange. (1994-2004) 50 0.04 0.02 0 0.00 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 BWI Maximum Temperature (F)

Why Doesn t Hot Weather Always Mean High O 3? Cloud cover, rain and wind associated with convection (thunderstorms). Strong winds alone can be enough to keep O 3 below the Code Red range. Source of the air mass can matter, onshore winds with maritime air mass characteristics are low in O 3 and precursors.

No Significant Difference in Transport Pattern Aloft in 2005 HYSPLIT (NOAA/ARL) back trajectory model results. 24-hour back trajectories terminating at 1000 m above ground level at 1200 UTC (0800 am local).

But, More Likely to Have Stagnation and Reverse Corridor Flow at Low Levels

Very Hot in 2005 but Weaker O 3 Response 60 3.00 Number of Days 50 40 30 20 10 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00-0.50-1.00 Departure from Normal Temperature (F) 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year -1.50 O3 > 85 Ave T While departure from normal temperature was > 2º F (similar to 1999, 2001-2002), number of days > 85 ppbv was 40% less frequent

Since 2003, the Number of Days 90 ºF Exceed the Number of Days 85 ppbv 60 50 Number of Days 40 30 20 High O3 T > 90 10 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year

Are We Seeing the Impact of the 22 State NO x Rule?

Regional NO x Controls and Local O 3 The working scientific hypothesis for O 3 control was: O 3 concentrations are limited by NO x for most of the eastern US excluding urban and nearurban areas. Point source NO x controls will decrease regional-scale (baseline) O 3. A lower baseline concentration would make it less likely for urban area O 3 spikes to exceed the NAAQS standard.

Phase in of Regional NO x Controls

Expected NO x Reductions are Significant Figure courtesy of DOE: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/

What Predictions from Hypothesis? If baseline O 3 is falling: Should see fewer total Code Red and Code Orange days While urban areas will still have local emissions sufficient for Code Red, should see fewer extreme O 3 cases Urban plume of high O3 should be smaller so that fewer monitors exceed Code Red or Code Orange for any given bad air day. Rural monitors should show lower O 3.

Number of Code Orange or Red Days (PHL) Philadelphia Red and Orange (1994-2005) 60 50 Recall: Number of Code Orange or Red days in 2005 is 45% less than 1994-2002 40 Number of Days 30 20 10 0 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year

In MARAMA Region, Number of Monitors Exceeding 85 ppbv Much Reduced 1600 1400 1200 Number of Monitors 1000 800 600 400 200 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 But 2003 and 2004 were not O 3 conducive although 2005 was.

And the Number of Monitors Exceeding 85 ppbv per Code Orange (or Red) Day are Lower as Well 8 7 6 Monitors/Day 5 4 3 2 1 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year

Total number of extreme O 3 Days (8-hour O 3 110 ppbv) for all MARAMA states 120 100 Number of Days > 110 ppbv 80 60 40 20 0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Mean O 3 and Frequency of High O 3 Days at Shenandoah NP 30 70 Days > 70 ppbv 25 20 15 10 5 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 Mean Ozone (ppbv) >= 70 median 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 30

Caveats No statistical significance with small data sample containing strong serial correlation. Although 2005 was hot and dry, classical high O 3 patterns not as frequent as 2002. 2003 and 2004 were low O 3 summer weather-wise.

NOAA O 3 Forecast Models: Current Configuration 1X 5X 3X

NOAA Forecast Model Assumes Large NO x Reductions

Overall Performance of Model Encouraging Figure Courtesy of Rohit Mathur (ARL/NOAA)

Analysis of Forecast Skill in PHL Performance in Difficult Cases Was Good Onset of high O 3 episode Termination of high O 3 episode Non-standard high O 3 cases Code Red Cases Large Error Cases Caught by Other Methods Systematic Errors Did Occur Urban core over-prediction High concentrations at sea/land boundary

Forecast Accuracy for O 3 Episode Days in PHL (Developmental Model 5X) PHL Domain 8-h Maximum Ozone (ppbv) During High Ozone Episodes (n = 8) Bias MAE Median rms NOAA -2.4 7 3.5 9.7 PHL-FC -4.4 7.8 6 9.9 Stat -3.2 7.2 5.5 8.9

July 26: Code Red Forecast Verifies But over-prediction in the urban corridor from Wilmington through Philadelphia.

July 22: Code Red Forecast Verifies Forecast 1-h Downtown PHL: 61-90 ppbv observed The opposite problem was found in 2003 (see below).

August 12: Missed Code Red Slight Westward Displacement of High O 3 Plume

August 4: Missed Code Red Convection in NJ Forecast Convection observed as forecast, no one told northern Delaware though..

Non-Standard Case: Low level winds drain from north to south

Systematic Errors: Abnormally high O 3 at bay/land interfaces

Large Error Case: False Alarm of Code Orange NAM-12 did not forecast cloud cover, statistical models handled case well.

Large Error Case: Offshore circulation causes stagnation near I-95

Conclusions for NOAA Model Performance in high O 3 episodes very promising: Onset and termination of high O 3 episodes well forecast Code Red cases identified Over-prediction in near-urban environment, adjusted for by post-processing? Large error cases occurred but caught by other forecasting approaches (e.g., statistical models) so didn t impact operational forecasting Problems remain with water surfaces: Atlantic coast and Chesapeake and Delaware Bays

Overall Conclusions 2005 was a hot summer and generally conducive to high O 3 although frequency of westerly transport a bit less. Peak O 3 concentrations lower, given the weather, than we would have expected. Suggestion, not proof, of NO x Rule impact. NOAA O 3 Forecast model shows promise but all bets off next year (WRF).