Consulting Scientists to the Disinfectant Industry. Certificate of Analysis. Remuvit Sanitising Hand Gel

Similar documents
Consulting Scientists to the Disinfectant Industry. Test Report. Safe Solutions (Safe4) Ltd Wharton Green House, Bostock Road, Winsford, CW7 3BD

Consulting Scientists to the Disinfectant Industry. Test Report. Sample ref: 16G/027 Date received: 12 July 2016

Lab Exercise 5: Pure culture techniques

Laboratory Exercise # 7: Aseptic Technique

Comparative Bacteriology Analysis: Source, cultivation, and preparation of bacterial samples:

Silver Nanoparticles Microbial Assessment by Adam Yang

Evaluation of the efficiency of Mxxxx as a barrier against microrganisms crossing

Microbiology. Definition of a Microorganism. Microorganisms in the Lab. The Study of Microorganisms

Supporting information

Pharmaceutical Microbiology Forum Newsletter Vol. 12 (4) Page 3 of 14 (NCIMB 8545, CIP NBRC. Salmonella enterica ssp typhimurium

Bacterial Gram Staining

PreAP Properties of Water Lab

TEST REPORT N M STUDY NF EN 1040 April 2006 BACTERICIDAL ACTIVITY Obligatory and additional Conditions

Originally published as:

ANTIMICROBIAL TESTING. E-Coli K-12 - E-Coli 0157:H7. Salmonella Enterica Servoar Typhimurium LT2 Enterococcus Faecalis

MICROBIOLOGY LAB #1 SAFETY RULES & GRAM STAIN METHOD

ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL COMPETITION

Science at the University of Auckland. Presented by igem

Microbiology Laboratory (BIOL 3702L) Page 1 of 10

ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR ATTRACTION

Interpretation Guide. Aerobic Count Plate

June 24, Q Laboratories, Inc Harrison Avenue Cincinnati, OH 45214

Use of the 3M Molecular Detection System for Salmonella and Listeria spp.

BASIC CULTURE TECHNIQUE: ASEPTIC TRANSFER

PHCT 401: Disinfectant Evaluation

Lab #3 ph and Buffers

Plant and animal cells (eukaryotic cells) have a cell membrane, cytoplasm and genetic material enclosed in a nucleus.

Performance Evaluation of Various ATP Detecting Units

SEC. Interpretation Guide. Select E. coli Count Plate

School of Rock (1 hour, Then 20 Minutes Each Day for the Following Five Days)

TEST OF PHTHALOCYANINES ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY

3M Petrifilm Aerobic Count Plates

3M Food Safety Technical Bulletin

The bactericidal potential of silver nanoparticles

THE JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE

3M Petrifilm Lactic Acid Bacteria Count Plate Reminders for Use

Project Title: Estimation of the area affected by animal feces in vegetable field under overhead sprinkle irrigation system

Magnetic Janus Nanorods for Efficient Capture, Separation. and Elimination of Bacteria

ALKEN-MURRAY CORPORATION P. O. Box 400, New Hyde Park, NY TELEPHONE Fax

Rapid Aerobic Count. Interpretation Guide. 3M Food Safety 3M Petrifilm Rapid Aerobic Count Plate

Procine GHb ELISA Kit

Western Carolina University

3M Petrifilm Lactic Acid Bacteria Count Plate

Distribution of "Attached" Salmonella typhimurium Cells Between Poultry Skin and a Surface Film Following Water Immersion

Most people think of volcanoes as destructive. The high temperature

Experiment 7: Titration of an Antacid

Chemical Background Information: Magnesium reacts with oxygen in air to for magnesium oxide, according to equation 1.

TSC AGAR (base) INTENDED USE / HISTORY

Lesson Plan Unit Plan: Topic: Grade and Content: Do Now: Aim: Performance Objectives: Vocabulary: Material Lists: Safety and Disposal:

A Selective Medium for Bacillus anthracis

Kinetics of Escherchia coli Destruction by Microwave Irradiation

Required Materials: immersion oil microscopes Kim-wipes prepared microscope slides

Substances and Mixtures:Separating a Mixture into Its Components

Human papillomavirus,hpv ELISA Kit

Chemical, Physical and Microbiological Indexes to the Surface Deterioration of Melamine Resin. (Received April 10, 1987)

NSW Higher School Certificate Senior Science 9.2 Lifestyle Chemistry

Monkey Kidney injury molecule 1,Kim-1 ELISA Kit

Acid-Base Titration Acetic Acid Content of Vinegar

Day 2 - Viewing a prepared slide of mixed bacteria on high power.

Part II. Cu(OH)2(s) CuO(s)

pglo/amp R Bacterial Transformation Lab

3M Food Safety Technical Bulletin

INTRODUCTION. Gram Stain

25. Qualitative Analysis 2

ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF PLANT EXTRACTS IN FOOD PRODUCTS

Evaluation of non-pathogenic surrogate bacteria as process validation indicators

Superconductivity. Never store liquid nitrogen in a container with a tight fitting lid.

maect PRODUCTION SOP M/1 JUNE 2007 version page: 1 Preparation of 2 liters of 10x concentrated PBS stock solution (phosphate buffered saline)

Canine brain natriuretic peptide,bnp ELISA Kit

Solutions With Formaldehyde-Water Solutions

Statistical Study of the Spot-Plate Technique for Viable-Cell Counts

THE IDENTIFICATION OF TWO UNKNOWN BACTERIA AFUA WILLIAMS BIO 3302 TEST TUBE 3 PROF. N. HAQUE 5/14/18

ACTIVITY OF PERA SAFE AGAINST BACILLUS ANTHRACIS SPORES

Supplementary Information

INTRODUCTION MATERIALS & METHODS

Station 1: Ionic versus Covalent Bonds / Electrolytes

Thermo Scientific RapidFinder Salmonella species, Typhimurium, and Enteritidis PCR Kit AOAC- RI PTM Matrix Extension: Method Comparison Study

Laboratory Report. Thus both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, yeast, dermatophytes and mould are detected.

EXPERIMENT. Stoichiometry of a Precipitation Reaction

Zoosporic Fungi Detected and Isolated from the Environment Chytrid Lore and More. Joyce E. Longcore School of Biology & Ecology

Chemistry 212 MOLAR MASS OF A VOLATILE LIQUID USING THE IDEAL GAS LAW

Coolidge-type molybdenum-target x-ray tube, the x-rays being

Pharmaceutics I. Unit 6 Rheology of suspensions

MONDAY (12/12) TUESDAY (12/13) WEDNESDAY (12/14) THURSDAY (12/15) FRIDAY (12/16) Making Acid Rain (a lab) Quiz

CTX-II (Human) ELISA Kit

Infrared Experiments of Thermal Energy and Heat Transfer

Name: Chemistry 103 Laboratory University of Massachusetts Boston HEATS OF REACTION PRELAB ASSIGNMENT

Introduction. Objectives

Determination of Orthophosphate Ion

Cell Shape coccus bacillus spirillum vibrio

Instructions for use. Glycine ELISA BA E-2100

DTNB-Thiols Assay Kit

SUBJECT SCIENCE CLASS VII CHAPTER 4, HEAT

Serotonin (Human) ELISA Kit

CHEM 334 Quantitative Analysis Laboratory

Experiences with the Coulter Counter in Bacteriology1

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Received for publication June 6, 1955

was prepared by the method of Beeby and Whitehouse and sodium hypochlorite were tested periodically; no changes were detected over the experimental

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Advanced Subsidiary Level and Advanced Level CHEMISTRY 9701/05

Bellevue College CHEM& 121 Experiment: Stoichiometric Analysis of an Antacid 1

Transcription:

Certificate of Analysis Sample(s): Received from: Remuvit Sanitising Hand Gel Klenitise Limited, Sophia House, 28 Cathedral Road, Cardiff,CF11 9LJ, UK Date received: 20 June 2012 Date tested: 29 June 2012 Certificate no: 12F.065HR.ECP Certificate date: 9 July 2012 Sample ref: 12F/065 Page: 1 of 7 Analysis required: EN 1500, Chemical disinfectants and antiseptics Hygienic handrub - Test method and requirements (phase 2, step 2) Volume of product used: Total rubbing time with product: Identification of bacterial strain(s) used: 6ml (2x 3ml) 1 minute (2x 30 seconds) Escherichia coli (K12) NCIMB 10083 Number in contamination fluid (N): 2.16 x 10 8 Neutralising solution: 30g/l polysorbate 80, 3g/l lecithin, 1g/l histidine, 1g/l cysteine Principle of test: The number of test organisms released from the fingertips of artificially contaminated hands is assessed before and after using the hygienic handrub. The ratio of the two resulting values is called the reduction factor; it represents a measure of antimicrobial activity of the hygienic handrub product tested. In order to achieve the necessary precision a large number of subjects has to be used because of the possible variation in bacterial flora found on human skin. In this case a total of fifteen healthy adults were chosen, each one carrying out the test procedure in precisely the same way as the others. To compensate for extraneous influences the test sample reduction factor (P) is compared with the reduction factor obtained with a parallel reference handrub procedure (R) which is performed with the same subjects, on the same day and under comparable environmental conditions. BSc, CBiol, MSB, MIFST, ACIEHO

9 July 2012 Certificate No: 12F.065HR.ECP Page 2 of 7 Experimental procedure: 1) Application of the contamination fluid Each of the 12 subjects was asked to wash their hands for 1 minute in soft soap to remove natural commensal organisms and then dry them thoroughly on a paper towel. The hands were then contaminated with very large numbers of bacteria well in excess of that experienced in normal everyday conditions. The hands were immersed in the contamination fluid (containing an overnight culture of the test organism, in this instance E. coli (K12), at a concentration of approximately 10 8 cfu/ml) in a suitable sized container for 5 seconds. The hands were removed from the contamination fluid and surplus liquid allowed to drain back into the container. This time the hands were allowed to air dry for approximately 3 minutes holding them horizontally with fingers spread out and rotating them to and fro to avoid the formation of droplets. 2) Prevalues Immediately after drying, each of the 12 subjects was asked to rub their fingertips, including the thumbs, for 1 minute on the base of a petri dish (a separate dish for each hand) containing 10ml of maximum recovery diluent (MRD) without neutraliser, in order to assess the release of test organisms before treatment of the hands. Dilutions of these sample fluids were prepared to 10-4. A 1ml aliquot of each dilution for each hand was placed in a separate petri dish, 10-15ml of Tryptone Soy Agar (sterilised and cooled to 45 C) added and mixed thoroughly. Plates were allowed to set and incubated at 37 C for 24 hours. Each plate was then examined for growth of the test organism. 3) Hygienic handrub procedure Each of the 12 subjects was asked to pour 3ml of 60% propan-2-ol into cupped hands and rub vigorously for 30s onto the skin, up to the wrists in accordance with the standard handrub procedure. This comprises five strokes backwards and forwards palm to palm, right palm over left dorsum and left palm over right dorsum, palm to palm with fingers interlaced, back of fingers to opposing palms with fingers interlocked, rotational rubbing of right thumb clasped in left palm and left thumb clasped in right palm, rotational rubbing with clasped fingers of right hand in palm of left hand and clasped fingers of left hand in right palm. Repeated with a further 3ml propan-2-ol to give a total rubbing time of 60 seconds. After 60 seconds the hands are rinsed under running tap water for 5 seconds, excess water is shaken off. BSc, CBiol, MSB, MIFST, ACIEHO

9 July 2012 Certificate No: 12F.065HR.ECP Page 3 of 7 4) Handrub procedure with test product (P) The above procedure was repeated exactly using the test product in place of propan-2-ol. The volume of test product used and the total rubbing time were as detailed in the table on the first page. 5) Postvalues Immediately after rinsing the 12 subjects were asked to rub the fingertips on the base of a petri dish containing 10ml of MRD with neutraliser for 1 minute using a separate petri dish for each hand. Then 1ml of each of the undiluted sample fluids was placed in a petri dish and covered with 15ml of TSA mixed thoroughly and allowed to set. Plates were then incubated overnight at 37 C and examined for growth of the test organism. 6) Calculation The number of colony forming units (cfu) per plate for each dilution was recorded and the number of cfu/ml of sample fluid calculated. For both reference and test procedure the log counts from right and left hands of each subject were averaged separately for prevalues and postvalues. From the difference between this individual combined log prevalue and the log postvalue a log reduction factor is established for each subject. Then the two arithmetic means of all individual log reduction factors are calculated for both the reference and the test procedure. For the test product to pass the criteria of EN 1500 the mean log reduction factor obtained must not be significantly smaller than that obtained for the propan-2-ol. Results: (see tables on following page) See tables on following pages. Difference of mean RFs: R-P = 5.70-5.72 = -0.02 Conclusion: This batch of Remuvit passes the requirements of EN 1500 for hygienic handrubs when tested under the procedures described above. BSc, CBiol, MSB, MIFST, ACIEHO

9 July 2012 Certificate No: 12F.065HR.ECP Page 4 of 7 Results table: Reference handrub procedure Subject Number of cfu per plate from dilution 10 X Prevalues Postvalues Number Hand 10-4 10-5 10 0 10-1 10-2 1 Left 1 178 ### 1 23 23 1 5 5 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 234 ### 1 27 27 1 8 8 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 2 Left 1 206 ### 1 22 22 1 11 11 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 272 ### 1 35 35 1 13 13 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 3 Left 1 250 ### 1 28 28 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 164 ### 1 19 19 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 4 Left ### >300 1 1 27 27 1 11 11 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 242 ### 1 27 27 1 7 7 ### 1 1 ### 0 1 5 Left 1 286 ### 1 30 30 1 12 12 ### 1 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 300 ### 1 33 33 1 15 15 ### 2 1 ### 1 1 6 Left 1 290 ### 1 25 25 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 254 ### 1 28 28 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 7 Left 1 278 ### 1 21 21 1 2 2 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right ### >300 1 1 28 28 1 3 3 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 8 Left 1 266 ### 1 32 32 1 2 2 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 240 ### 1 30 30 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 9 Left 1 258 ### 1 34 34 1 5 5 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 270 ### 1 37 37 1 7 7 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 10 Left 1 266 ### 1 29 29 1 11 11 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 292 ### 1 31 31 1 18 18 ### 2 1 ### 1 1 11 Left ### >300 1 1 35 35 1 15 15 ### 3 1 ### 1 1 Right 1 258 ### 1 26 26 1 8 8 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 12 Left 1 272 ### 1 30 30 1 12 12 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 214 ### 1 23 23 1 11 11 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Numbers in blue used for further computation cr BSc, CBiol, MSB, MIFST, ACIEHO

9 July 2012 Certificate No: 12F.065HR.ECP Page 5 of 7 Results table: Handrub procedure with test product Subject Number of cfu per plate from dilution 10 X Prevalues Postvalues Number Hand 10-4 10-5 10 0 10-1 10-2 1 Left 1 256 ### 1 28 28 1 11 11 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 284 ### 1 33 33 1 5 5 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 2 Left ### >300 1 1 35 35 1 21 21 ### 1 1 ### 0 1 Right ### >300 1 1 35 35 1 16 16 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 3 Left 1 266 ### 1 29 29 1 3 3 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 230 ### 1 27 27 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 4 Left ### >300 1 1 30 30 1 18 18 ### 2 1 ### 1 1 Right 1 258 ### 1 26 26 1 15 15 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 5 Left 1 276 ### 1 30 30 1 6 6 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right ### >300 1 1 35 35 1 2 2 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 6 Left 1 255 ### 1 25 25 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 220 ### 1 27 27 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 7 Left 1 264 ### 1 22 22 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 298 ### 1 25 25 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 8 Left 1 252 ### 1 28 28 1 5 5 ### 1 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 230 ### 1 25 25 1 8 8 ### 2 1 ### 1 1 9 Left 1 216 ### 1 19 19 1 3 3 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 184 ### 1 15 15 1 0 1 ### 0 1 ### 0 1 10 Left 1 252 ### 1 26 26 1 12 12 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Right ### >300 1 1 29 29 1 15 15 ### 2 1 ### 1 1 11 Left 1 274 ### 1 31 31 1 17 17 ### 2 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 238 ### 1 25 25 1 11 11 ### 1 1 ### 0 1 12 Left ### >300 1 1 35 35 1 13 13 ### 1 1 ### 0 1 Right 1 266 ### 1 29 29 1 10 10 ### 1 1 ### 0 1 Numbers in blue used for further computation cr BSc, CBiol, MSB, MIFST, ACIEHO

9 July 2012 Certificate No: 12F.065HR.ECP Page 6 of 7 Results table: Computed log values (means of left and right hand) and log reduction factors Subject Reference disinfection Disinfection procedure procedure (R) with test product (P) log x log y log z log x log y log z 1 6.32 0.80 5.52 6.44 0.87 5.57 2 6.38 1.08 5.30 6.54 1.26 5.28 3 6.31 0.00 6.31 6.40 0.24 6.16 4 6.41 0.94 5.47 6.44 1.22 5.22 5 6.47 1.13 5.34 6.49 0.54 5.95 6 6.43 0.00 6.43 6.38 0.00 6.38 7 6.44 0.39 6.05 6.44 0.00 6.44 8 6.41 0.15 6.26 6.39 0.80 5.59 9 6.43 0.77 5.66 6.29 0.24 6.05 10 6.45 1.15 5.30 6.43 1.13 5.30 11 6.48 1.04 5.44 6.41 1.14 5.27 12 6.39 1.06 5.33 6.49 1.06 5.43 ẍ 6.41 0.71 5.70 6.43 0.71 5.72 s 0.05 0.45 0.44 0.06 0.48 0.45 N 12 12 12 12 12 12 log x: log prevalue log y: log postvalue log z: log reduction factor ẍ: overall mean of log x, log y, log z s: standard deviation N: number of values (subjects) in each column BSc, CBiol, MSB, MIFST, ACIEHO

9 July 2012 Certificate No: 12F.065HR.ECP Page 7 of 7 Neutralization & toxicity validation Test Organism Escherichia coli K12 Validation Vc1 234 Vc2 206 Suspension = 234 = 206 (Nvₒ) ẍ = 220 Neutraliser Vc1 204 Vc2 226 Control = 204 = 226 (B) ẍ = 215 0.5Nvₒ Method Vc1 212 Vc2 228 Validation = 212 = 228 (C) ẍ = 220 0.5Nvₒ Test 10-6 Vc1 219 Vc2 216 Suspension TRUE 219 TRUE 216 10-7 Vc1 12 Vc2 28 Vc = plate count per ml TRUE 12 TRUE 28 ẍ = average of Vc1 and Vc2 (N) ẅ = 2.16 x 10 8 ẅ = weighted mean of ẍ R = reduction (lg R = lg Nₒ lg Na) cnr BSc, CBiol, MSB, MIFST, ACIEHO