The Association of Dust Disks and Planets P.I. Lynne Hillenbrand(Caltech) Co-Is. Geoff Marcy(UC Berkeley), Debra Fischer(UC Berkeley),

Similar documents
Formation and Evolution of Planetary Systems

Planet formation in protoplanetary disks. Dmitry Semenov Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Heidelberg, Germany

Placing Our Solar System in Context with the Spitzer Space Telescope

How inner planetary systems relate to inner and outer debris belts. Mark Wyatt Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge

HD10647 and the Distribution of Exoplanet Properties with Semi-major Axis

IRS SPECTRA OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS: A SEARCH FOR ASTEROID BELT ANALOGS

Outline. RV Planet Searches Improving Doppler Precision Population Synthesis Planet Formation Models Eta-Earth Survey Future Directions

Constraining the Evolution of Molecular Gas in Weak-Line T-Tauri Stars. 1. Motivation

Exoplanet Host Stars

Debris Disks: A Brief Observational History Thomas Oberst April 19, 2006 A671

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 24 Apr 2000

Placing Our Solar System in Context: [A 12 step program to learn to accept disk evolution]

Importance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets

2018 TIARA Summer School Origins of the Solar System. Observations and Modelling of Debris Disks. J.P. Marshall (ASIAA) Wednesday 18 th July 2018

OGLE-TR-56. Guillermo Torres, Maciej Konacki, Dimitar D. Sasselov and Saurabh Jha INTRODUCTION

A Long-Period Jupiter-Mass Planet Orbiting the Nearby M Dwarf GJ 849 1

Spitzer Space Telescope Imaging of Spatially- Resolved Debris Disks. Karl Stapelfeldt Jet Propulsion Laboratory MSC d2p: Mar

White Paper. Terrestrial and Habitable Planet Formation in Binary and Multi-star Systems

Detectability of extrasolar debris. Mark Wyatt Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge

Transneptunian objects. Minor bodies in the outer Solar System. Transneptunian objects

Observations of exozodiacal disks. Jean-Charles Augereau LAOG, Grenoble, France. ISSI team: Exozodiacal dust diks and Darwin. Cambridge, August 2009

The Fomalhaut Debris Disk

Lecture 20: Planet formation II. Clues from Exoplanets

Are planets and debris correlated? Herschel imaging of 61 Vir

Mid-IR and Far-IR Spectroscopic Measurements & Variability. Kate Su (University of Arizona)

Extrasolar Planets. Methods of detection Characterization Theoretical ideas Future prospects

Star formation : circumstellar environment around Young Stellar Objects

Induced Eccentricities of Extra Solar Planets by Distant Stellar Companions

Data from: The Extrasolar Planet Encyclopaedia.

II. Results from Transiting Planets. 1. Global Properties 2. The Rossiter-McClaughlin Effect

The Protostellar Luminosity Function

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 5 Dec 2001

CENTRAL STAR LUMINOSITY MEAN GLOBAL TEMPERATURE SILICATE-ROCK WEATHERING SPREADING RATE HEAT FLOW

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.sr] 28 Mar 2016

Fundamental (Sub)stellar Parameters: Surface Gravity. PHY 688, Lecture 11

Probing the Galactic Planetary Census

Gas at the inner disk edge

Planetary System Stability and Evolution. N. Jeremy Kasdin Princeton University

Debris discs, exoasteroids and exocomets. Mark Wyatt Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge

Planets: Name Distance from Sun Satellites Year Day Mercury 0.4AU yr 60 days Venus yr 243 days* Earth 1 1 yr 1 day Mars 1.

Radial Velocity Planet Surveys. Jian Ge, University of Florida

10/16/ Detecting Planets Around Other Stars. Chapter 10: Other Planetary Systems The New Science of Distant Worlds

Discovery of Planetary Systems With SIM

Pluto, the Kuiper Belt, and Trans- Neptunian Objects

DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY. Planets around white dwarfs Matt Burleigh

Young Solar-like Systems

Origins of Stars and Planets in the VLT Era

TrES Exoplanets and False Positives: Finding the Needle in the Haystack

Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event National Exam

Exoplanets Atmospheres. Characterization of planetary atmospheres. Photometry of planetary atmospheres from direct imaging

Searching for planets around other stars. Searching for planets around other stars. Searching for other planetary systems this is a hard problem!

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANET-HOSTING STARS AND OPTIMIZATION OF THE EXTRASOLAR PLANET SEARCHES

Star Formation. Spitzer Key Contributions to Date

Debris Disks from Spitzer to Herschel and Beyond. G. H. Rieke, K. Y. L. Su, et al. Steward Observatory The University of Arizona

Planet Detection. AST 105 Intro Astronomy The Solar System

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 25 Aug 1998

Planetary Companions to HD , HD 50554, and HD

Star Formation. Answering Fundamental Questions During the Spitzer Warm Mission Phase

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 23 May 2007

EXONEST The Exoplanetary Explorer. Kevin H. Knuth and Ben Placek Department of Physics University at Albany (SUNY) Albany NY

4 1 Extrasolar Planets

Extrasolar Planets: Molecules and Disks

MARVELS: Revealing the Formation and Dynamical Evolution of Giant Planet Systems

Debris disk structure arising from planetary perturbations

Observations of Extrasolar Planets

Planet Formation: theory and observations. Sean Raymond University of Colorado (until Friday) Observatoire de Bordeaux

Dynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks

Indirect Methods: gravitational perturbation of the stellar motion. Exoplanets Doppler method

Lecture 12: Extrasolar planets. Astronomy 111 Monday October 9, 2017

Extrasolar Planets and Chemical Abundance

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

ALMA Observations of the Disk Wind Source AS 205

What Have We Found? 1978 planets in 1488 systems as of 11/15/15 ( ) 1642 planets candidates (

The Transit Method: Results from the Ground

A Tale of Star and Planet Formation. Lynne Hillenbrand Caltech

The Golden Era of Planetary Exploration: From Spitzer to TPF. The Observational Promise

CIRCUMSTELLAR DISKS AND OUTER PLANET FORMATION

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 6 Apr 2007

Who was here? How can you tell? This is called indirect evidence!

Formation of Planets around M & L dwarfs

EUROPEAN SOUTHERN OBSERVATORY

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM

Kate Su (University of Arizona)

Date of delivery: 29 June 2011 Journal and vol/article ref: IAU Number of pages (not including this page): 5

Other Planetary Systems (Chapter 13) Extrasolar Planets. Is our solar system the only collection of planets in the universe?

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 14 Sep 2005

Searching for Other Worlds: The Methods

Debris Disks and the Evolution of Planetary Systems. Christine Chen September 1, 2009

What Fraction of Sun-like Stars have Planets?

Giant Planet Formation

Chapter 13 Lecture. The Cosmic Perspective Seventh Edition. Other Planetary Systems: The New Science of Distant Worlds Pearson Education, Inc.

Extrasolar Planets. Properties Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Forming the Kuiper Belt by the Outward Transport of Objects During Neptune s Migration

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 14 Dec 2009

Joseph Castro Mentor: Nader Haghighipour

Actuality of Exoplanets Search. François Bouchy OHP - IAP

Stellar Astronomy Sample Questions for Exam 3

The architecture of planetary systems revealed by debris disk imaging

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM

Searching for transiting giant extrasolar planets. Department of Physics University of Tokyo Yasushi Suto

Transcription:

1 The Association of Dust Disks and Planets P.I. Lynne Hillenbrand(Caltech) Co-Is. Geoff Marcy(UC Berkeley), Debra Fischer(UC Berkeley), Abstract We propose to continue a successful search for planetary-mass companions to stars younger than the Sun. Planet searches to date typically have targetted older stars which are expected to have lower photospheric activity. Recent work, however, has demonstrated that it is possible to monitor activity-induced velocity jitter via the Ca II H&K emission lines and specific absorption line profiles, and correct for the jitter in order to derive radial velocity curves sensitive to Jupiter- and Saturn-mass planetary companions. Our targets are drawn from a sample of stars being observed with Spitzer from 3.5-7 µm and for which detailed information ondustdiskswillbeavailablewithin1year. Theyoungstarsinoursamplecouldhavedusty disksthatmayhaverecentlyspawnedplanets,andtheolderstarscouldhavedustdisksthatare caused by, and shaped by, existing planets. The evolution of disks and planets are inexorably connected. Our proposed observations will, in concert with the Spitzer data, provide the first direct assessment of the association of dust disks and planets.

Hillenbrandetal.KeckI/HIRESProposalfor24B 1 Disks and Planets Science Case Raw material for building planetary embryos, earth-like rocks, and even gas giant planets is abundant in circumstellar disks surrounding newborn stars. At older ages, observations of rejuvenated debris disks around nearby main sequence stars, along with studies of the zodiacal dust and Kuiper belt in our own Solar System, have suggested a close relationship between disks and planetary systems. The FEPS Spitzer/Legacy program(meyer et al., 22) will carry out sensitive observations from 3.5-7 µm of nearby solar-type stars. We target the 3 Myr 3 Gyr age range and will measure the properties and time scales of both primordial planet building disks and secondary debris disks, establishing an evolutionary sequence to ages just younger than the Sun. We willdetectdustmassesaslowasthatinferredforourownpresent daykuiperbelt(6 1 22 g), surrounding stars within 3 pc, with sensitivity decreasing to the most distant targets at 15 pc. The few disks for which spatially resolved information exists are asymmetric radially, azimuthally, or both. Such intriguing morphology is often attributed to dynamical response of the disk to an embedded planet. Holes, gaps, truncated edges, and warps are consistent with planet disk interactions(e.g.,calvetetal. 22;Wolfetal. 22;Ozernoyetal. 21;Telescoetal. 21). Indeed, our zodiacal dust disk exhibits clear signatures in IRAS and COBE data of gravitational effects induced by the planets, including:(1) a warp in the zodiacal cloud caused by differing orbital tiltsoftheplanets;(2)displacementofthesunfromthecenterofthezodiacaldisk,duetoplanetary orbital eccentricities;(3) bands of dust caused by collisions between large asteroids, stirred from circular orbits by gravitational interactions with planets; and(4) localized regions of dust produced bytrappingofparticlesinresonances(e.g. Reachetal. 1995;Wyattetal. 1999;Liou&Zook, 1999). Our Spitzer/Legacy team is currently developing a suite of models for comparison with our data that simulate observable effects of planets on disks(see, e.g. Moro-Martin& Malhotra, 24, 23, 22; Backman et al. 24; Wolf& Hillenbrand, 23). Our goal with this proposal is to continue a recently initiated observing program to test these forthcoming predictions based on Spitzer data by searching for the planets themselves. More than 12 extrasolar planets have been discovered to date. Measured masses and orbits constrain the physics of the disks in which they formed and the dynamical evolution(i.e. orbital migration and planet disk interactions; e.g., Lin et al., 2; Kley, 2; and Ward& Hahn, 2) at early stages. Important emerging properties of known extrasolar planets include:(1) near-uniform distribution withorbitaldistance(dn/dloga const);(2)risingmassdistribution(dn/dm M.7 );(3) prevelance of eccentric orbits(< e >=.34, for a=.2 3.5 AU);(4) hot jupiters (giant planets within<.1auof.8%ofallfgkmstars);(5)giantplanetsinarangeofmoredistantorbits around 8-15% of all FGKM stars; and(6) commonality of multiple planets, often in resonances. Todatehowever,therehasnotbeenanyempiricalstudyofdustdisksandplanetsaroundthe same stars. We initiated just such a systematic investigation during 22B and propose to continue it here. Our Spitzer/Legacy observations will be sensitive to gaps and holes in the disks located between.3 4 AU, likely caused by planets at those orbital radii. A Planet Search around Young Stars The existing Doppler planet surveys(e.g. Marcy, Cochran,& Mayor 2, Marcy& Butler 2) have, thusfar, specifically targetted stars(see source list in Nidever et al., 22) that are older than 3Gyr. Theonlyexceptionisasurveyof.6GyrHyadesmembers(Cochranetal. 22). The

Hillenbrandetal.KeckI/HIRESProposalfor24B 2 younger stars can pose a challenge to precision Doppler work due to the enhanced starspot and plage magnetic activity of their photospheres that causes a velocity jitter, acting as noise in the Doppler measurements. For FGK stars there is decreasing jitter towards later spectral types(e.g. Santosetal.2)withamplitude1 3ms 1 forstarsofage.1 1Gyr(e.g.Figure2ofPaulson et al. 24). Recall that our Spitzer/Legacy sample is.3 3 Gyr. However, corrections for velocity jitter are possible. As demonstrated by Saar et al. (1998, 2) velocity shifts can be correlated with spectroscopic activity indicators. At least 3 previously announcedplanets(hd166435b,hd192263b,andhd19632b,allbytheswissgroup)havebeen retracted due to later discovery of unaccounted for radial velocity and activity correlations(queloz et al. 21, Henry et al. 22; Butler et al. 24). Simultaneous monitoring of the chromospheric CaIIH&Kemissionlinesisthekey,enablingjitterreductionto 5ms 1. Thisprecisionallows detection of Jupiter-mass planets at 5 AU, and Saturn mass planets within 1 AU, making planet detectionnearlyasrobustforthesemiddle-age.1 3Gyrstarsasitisfortheolder>3Gyrstars. Proposed Measurements and Source List We haveadopted thedopplertechniqueusedbymarcyetal. thatisproven successfulwith Keck/HIRES. In addition to the radial velocity measurement itself, we obtain simultaneous measures of the CaII H&K core emission and monitor asymmetries and ratios of absorption lines (Hamilton& Lester 1999), both for velocity jitter correction. The jitter de-correlation algorithms havebeenunderdevelopmentforsometimeandarereachingastageofmaturity. Ourdataare theirfirstmajorapplication. Withthemwewillobtainprecisionof5ms 1 forallstars,thus rendering our Doppler measurements photon limited in precision. We are searching for planets around 1 of the targets from our Spitzer/Legacy program(see age distributioninfigure1). Thesestarshavemasses.7-1.4M,andV=7-12mag,idealfor DopplerplanetsearcheswithKeck. Wehavechosenstars> 3 declination,d<5pc,spt> F6, age >8 Myr, and no companions within 2 based on our Palomar/PALAO survey(metchev etal.). Forouraveragestar(V=1),a1minexposureisneeded;simultaneousCCDreadout and telescope slewing takes 7 sec. Since initiation of this program we have obtained with HIRES over1observingnights,5-8spectraofeachstarandalso template (noiodinecellinthebeam) spectra for some portion of the sample which serve as the reference against which Doppler shifts are measuredandthedataonwhichspectralsynthesisisperformed(leadingtoaccuratevaluesoft eff, log g, vsini,[fe/h] and other abundances). Figure 2 shows radial velocity curves obtained to date for a representative sample of our targets. At present the most critical need is for the remaining template spectra(december/january visibility). With them, at any given time t the presence of planets with periods < t can be assessed. Longer baseline observations are needed to sense planets orbiting farther from their host star, with a 1-year baseline required to detect planets at 5 AU. From the known occurrence of giant planets, we expect to discover 1 15 planets from among the 1 Spitzer targetstars. Atleast3aresuspectedfromthedatainhandthusfar. Theirmasses and orbits will feed directly into disk models designed to explain the Spitzer spectrophotometry. Project Plan This is a semi-long term effort. To achieve maximum efficiency we have recently classified each star based upon our early observations(5-8 Doppler points over 1 year) into one of three categories (see Table below) which then merit different frequencies of continued observation. This strategy ensures efficient use of the Keck telescope.

Hillenbrandetal.KeckI/HIRESProposalfor24B 3 Early Doppler Classification Observing Cadence novariationseenat±3ms 1 onceperyear trend,havinglongtimescale(τ>2yr) twiceperyear,toestablishlong-periodorbit short time scale(τ <2 yr) variations as often as possible, until orbit established We will continue to work closely with Marcy and adopt the Marcy/Butler/Vogt observing technique and reduction pipeline. With that pipeline, we reduce all Doppler results during the morning, immediately after each Keck night. All velocities are available within 24 hours of the acquisition of the observations. We also adopt the Marcy et al. software for sensing the emergent Keplerian velocity variations and performing the Keplerian fitting, as well as the Fischer& Valenti spectral synthesis analysis. The P.I. of the Spitzer/Legacy project is Michael Meyer. Pasadena-based members of this Spitzer/Legacy team include John Carpenter, John Stauffer, and Deborah Padgett. SUMMARY: To continue our survey of 1 young stars for Jupiter- and Saturn-mass analogswithin5auwerequest2-4nightsonkeckiwithhires. References Calvet, N., D Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A.& Sitko, M., 22, ApJ, 568, 18. Cochran, W.D., Hatzes, A.P.,& Paulson, D.B. 22, AJ, 124, 565 Hamilton, D. and Lester, J.B. 1999, PASP, 111, 1132. Henry, G.W., Donahue, R.A.,& Baliunas, S.L. 22, ApJ, 577, L111 Kley,W.2,MNRAS,313,L47 Lin, D.N.C., Papaloizou, J.C.B., Terquem, C., Bryden, G., Ida, S. 2, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed V. Mannings, A. P. Boss& S. S. Russell(Tucson: University of Arizona Press), p.1111. Liou,J.-C.,&Zook,H.A.,AJ,118,58 Marcy,G.W.,Butler,R.P.,Vogt,S.S.,Fischer,D.A.,Liu,M.C.,1999,ApJ,52,239 Marcy, G.W., Butler, R. P. 2 Planets Orbiting Other Suns, PASP, 112, 137 Marcy,G.W.,Cochran,W.D.,Mayor,M.2,inProtostarsandPlanetsIV,edV.Mannings,A.P.Boss&S.S.Russell (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), p.1285. Mayor,M.&Queloz,D.1995,Nature,378,355 Meyer,M.R.,etal. 22in TheOriginsofStarsandPlanets: TheVLTView (editedbyj.alvesandm.mccaughrean), astro-ph/1938 Moro-Martin, A.,& Malhotra, R., 22, AJ, 124, 235 Nidever,D.L.,Marcy,G.W.,Butler,R.P.,&Fischer,D.A.,22,ApJS141,53 Ozernoy, L.M., Gorkavyi,N.N., Mather,J.C., Taidakova,T.A. 2, ApJL, 537, 147 Queloz,D.,Henry,G.W.,Sivan,J.P.,Baliunas,S.L.,Beuzit,J.L.,Donahue,R.A.,Mayor,M.,Naef,D.,Perrier,C.,Udry, S.21,A&A,379,279 Paulson, D.B., Cochran, W.D.,& Hatzes, A.P. 24, AJ, in press Reach,W.T.,Franz,B.A.,Weiland,J.L.,Hauser,M.G.,Kelsall,T.N.,&Rawley,G.1995,Nature,374,521 Saar,S.H.,Fischer,D.2,ApJ,534,L15 Saar,S.H.,Butler,R.P.,&Marcy,G.W.1998,ApJ,498,L153 Santos,N.C.,Mayor,M.,Naef,D.,Pep,F.,Queloz,D.,Udry,S.,&Blecha,A.2,A&A361,265 Telesco,C.M.,Fisher,R.S.,Pia,R.K.,Knacke,R.F.,Dermott,S.F.,Wyatt,M.C.,Grogan,K.,Holmes,E.K.,Ghez,A. M., Prato, L., Hartmann, L. W., Jayawardhana, R. 2 ApJ, 53, 329 Ward,W.R.& Hahn J.M. 2, in Protostars and Planets IV, eds Mannings, V., Boss, A.P., Russell, S. S.,(Tucson: University of Arizona Press), p. 1135 Wolf,S.,Gueth,F.,Henning,Th.,&Kley,W.,22,ApJL566,97 Wyatt, M.C., Dermott, S.F., Telesco, C.M., Fisher, R.S., Grogan, K., Holmes, E.K., Pina, R.K., 1999, ApJ, 527, 918

Hillenbrandetal.KeckI/HIRESProposalfor24B 4 Figure 1: Distribution of ages for the FEPS Spitzer/Legacy sample(hatched histogram) compared tocurrentplanetsearchtargets(openhistogram),whosemeanageis4.5gyrwitha1σspreadof 2 Gyr. The search conducted under the auspicies of this proposal focusses on those objects from thefepssamplewithages>8myr.recentworkhasdemonstratedthatitispossibletocorrect for activity-induced velocity jitter in these younger stars and hence derive radial velocity curves sensitive to planetary-mass companions as have been found surrounding 8-15% of the older stas.

Hillenbrandetal.KeckI/HIRESProposalfor24B 5 3 2 1 1 2 3 6 4 2 2 4 6 2 2 HD 2595 G2 V RMS = 3.77 ms 1 UNC INT = 3.21 ms 1 2 4 6 8 1 Julian Date 24625 HD 15554.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 1.6 Time (Year 22) HD 141937 RMS = 41. ms 1 UNC INT = 3.86 ms 1 RMS = 259. ms 1 UNC INT = 3.69 ms 1 3 2 1 1 2 3 3 2 1 1 2 HD 24277 F8 V RMS = 3.7 ms 1 UNC INT = 3.73 ms 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 Julian Date 24625 HD 19228 G5 IV RMS = 1.4 ms 1 UNC INT = 2.96 ms 1 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Julian Date 24625 15 1 5 5 HD 22917 RMS = 81.9 ms 1 UNC INT = 19.6 ms 1 4 23. 23.5 24. Time (yr) 1.6.8 1. 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Time (Year 22) Figure 2: Data for representative stars from the FEPS planet search illustrating the various types of radial velocity signatures seen thusfar. Top panels: Constant or very low-amplitude variables, constituting approximately 75% of the sample. Middle panels: A steady decline and a steady rise, both with potential flattening. Bottom panels: Likely planetary companions. The latter two categories of radial velocity variables constitue about 25% of the sample.