Analysis of Soil and Sewage Sludge in the Field with a Portable ED-XRF Spectrometer

Similar documents
In-Situ Analysis of Traces, Minor and Major Elements in Rocks and Soils with a Portable XRF Spectrometer*

1. Breakthrough quantitative analysis

Overview of X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis

LAB REPORT ON XRF OF POTTERY SAMPLES By BIJOY KRISHNA HALDER Mohammad Arif Ishtiaque Shuvo Jie Hong

ED(P)XRF: SCREENING ANALYSIS AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS with POLARIZED

ICP/MS Multi-Element Standards

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Aluminum, Potassium, Magnesium, ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE ANALYTE CERTIFIED VALUE

Elemental analysis by X-ray f luorescence. Sequential benchtop WDXRF spectrometer

The Agilent 7700x ICP-MS Advantage for Drinking Water Analysis

Analysis of Cadmium (Cd) in Plastic Using X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Analysis Repeatability of Trace and Major Elements in a Water Sample

TRACE ELEMENT ANALYSIS USING A BENCHTOP TXRF- SPECTROMETER

Geogenic versus Anthropogenic Metals and Metalloids

Thermo Scientific icap RQ ICP-MS: Typical limits of detection

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution. Calcium, Iron, Potassium,

FINDING A NEEDLE IN A HAYSTACK: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PORTABLE XRF INSTRUMENTS FROM THREE MANUFACTURERS

Simple, reliable analysis of high matrix samples according to US EPA Method 6020A using the Agilent 7700x/7800 ICP-MS

materials and their properties

Elemental analysis by X-ray f luorescence. High performance EDXRF elemental analyzer

S2 PICOFOX. Innovation with Integrity. Spectrometry Solutions TXRF

ANALYSIS CERTIFICATE OF

OES - Optical Emission Spectrometer 2000

Chapter 2 Atoms and the Periodic Table

Determination of Impurities in Silica Wafers with the NexION 300S/350S ICP-MS

The Baltic Soil Survey

Trace Metal Dynamic Extraction from Five Pumps in Hydrochloric Acid. Submitted to: Reto Schoeb Levitronix GmbH. Submitted by:

Introduction to LIBS COMMUNITY USER WORKSHOP ON PLANETARY LIBS (CHEMCAM) DATA. Sam Clegg and the ChemCam team

ICP-OES Application Note Number 35

Full file at

CHEM 10113, Quiz 5 October 26, 2011

AMMS-100 Atmospheric Metal Monitoring System

ICP-3000 Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer

Summary of test results for Daya Bay rock samples. by Patrick Dobson Celia Tiemi Onishi Seiji Nakagawa

Cost-Effective Condition Monitoring The SPECTRO GENESIS Petrochem ICP-OES

Chapter 1 -- Introduction to Qualitative Analysis. NAME: Lab Section: Date: Sign-Off:

Altitude influence of elemental distribution in grass from Rila mountain. Dr. E. Nikolova, Dr. A. Artinyan, S. Nikolova INRNE - BAS XRF Laboratory

Gamma and X-Ray Standards

Quantitative XRF Analysis. algorithms and their practical use

Using the Periodic Table

Writing Chemical formula with polyatomic groups

The Periodic Table of the Elements

High Throughput Water Analysis using Agilent 7900 ICP-MS coupled with ESI prepfast

Element Cube Project (x2)

What monitoring techniques are appropriate and effective for detecting CO2 migration in groundwater: isotope-based monitoring Philippe Négrel

Worldwide Open Proficiency Test for X Ray Fluorescence Laboratories PTXRFIAEA13. Determination of Major, Minor and Trace Elements in a Clay Sample

GOZO COLLEGE BOYS SECONDARY SCHOOL

Single-Element Standards for AAS

Fast Analysis of Water Samples Comparing Axially-and Radially- Viewed CCD Simultaneous ICP-OES

CT Associates, Inc. Trace Metal Dynamic Extraction from Three Centrifugal Pumps in Hydrochloric Acid. Submitted to: Juergen Hahn Levitronix GmbH

U.S. EPA SW-846 Method 6010C using the Prodigy High Dispersion ICP

Electron Configurations

Single Analyte Mass Spec Solution ± µg/ml g/ml (measured at 20 ± 1 ºC) METHOD NIST SRM# SRM LOT#

1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION 2.0 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 3.0 CERTIFIED VALUES AND UNCERTAINTIES. Assay Information:

Name: SCH3U Worksheet-Trends

Analysis of high matrix samples using argon gas dilution with the Thermo Scientific icap RQ ICP-MS

8. Relax and do well.

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Radiometric Dating (tap anywhere)

Note that the protons and neutrons are each almost 2,000 times more massive than an electron; What is the approximate diameter of an atom?

Reporting Category 1: Matter and Energy

In addition to the information at the end of the exam, you will be given a periodic table.

6.3 Classifying Elements with the Periodic Table

1 Arranging the Elements

Topic 3: Periodicity OBJECTIVES FOR TODAY: Fall in love with the Periodic Table, Interpret trends in atomic radii, ionic radii, ionization energies &

Essential Chemistry for Biology

1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION 2.0 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 3.0 CERTIFIED VALUES AND UNCERTAINTIES. Assay Information:

February 20, Joe Cerniglia The International Group for Historic Aircraft Recovery (TIGHAR) Job Number: S0CHG688. Dear Joe:

Direct Analysis of Trace Metal Impurities in High Purity Nitric Acid Using ICP-QQQ

Microsoft Excel Directions

Chapter 3: Stoichiometry

FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS ANALYSIS OF ROHS ELEMENTS IN PLASTICS

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Reporting Category 1: Matter and Energy

Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2e (Tro) Chapter 2 Atoms and Elements. Multiple Choice Questions

Single Analyte Custom Grade Solution ± 4 µg/ml g/ml (measured at 20 ± 1 ºC) Acidimetric NIST SRM 84L Lot Number: 84L

Chemistry 31A Autumn 2004 Professors Chidsey & Zare Exam 2 Name:

2 (27) 3 (26) 4 (21) 5 (18) 6 (8) Total (200) Periodic Table

100% ionic compounds do not exist but predominantly ionic compounds are formed when metals combine with non-metals.

Dear PAP Chemistry Students,

Unit 1 Part 2 Atomic Structure and The Periodic Table Introduction to the Periodic Table UNIT 1 ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND THE PERIODIC TABLE

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

ORBITAL DIAGRAM - A graphical representation of the quantum number "map" of electrons around an atom.

8. Relax and do well.

Ch. 3 Answer Key. O can be broken down to form two atoms of H and 1 atom of O. Hydrogen and oxygen are elements.

Single Analyte Custom Grade Solution g/ml (measured at 20 ± 1 ºC) ICP Assay NIST SRM 3163 Lot Number:

Trace elemental analysis of challenging samples in the mining and resource industry. Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany April 8, 2015

Teacher Workbooks. Science and Nature Series. Atomic Structure, Electron Configuration, Classifying Matter and Nuclear Chemistry, Vol.

XUV 773: X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Gemstones

Peter L Warren, Pamela Y Shadforth ICI Technology, Wilton, Middlesbrough, U.K.

Unit 3 Atomic Structure

CHEM 130 Exp. 8: Molecular Models

Principles of Chemistry: A Molecular Approach 2e (Tro) Chapter 2 Atoms and Elements

Data report for elemental analysis of IMPROVE samples collected during April, May, June 2009 UC Davis Submitted June 18, 2010 SUMMARY

Determination of Chromium in Gelatin Capsules using an Agilent 7700x ICP-MS

VIIIA H PREDICTING CHARGE

Samples compliant with the WATER

Last 4 Digits of USC ID:

Nucleus. Electron Cloud

How many grams of sodium metal is required to completely react with 2545 grams of chlorine gas?

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Transcription:

AN APPLICATION BRIEF FROM SPECTRO ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS When results matter Analysis of Soil and Sewage Sludge in the Field with a Portable ED-XRF Spectrometer Introduction Arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc are among the many contaminants that enter the environment through industrial, agricultural, or other human activity as well as through natural causes. Addressing this requires identifying the site, characterizing it in terms of the level of contamination and then cleaning, removing, or isolating the affected areas. Determining the best course of action requires detailed and precise information on the contaminants that are present, which traditionally has been done in the lab. Recent advances in technology, however, enable accurate analysis in the field.

2 The need for analysis in the field Much of the laboratory analysis of contaminants in soils and sludge has been done using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Commonly accepted methods for ICP-OES analysis of soil and sludge involve sample digestion or extraction. But this is not useful for some special applications like determining the presence of antimony in soil, for example, because it might not bring antimony into the sample solution. ICP also does not provide adequate precision for bulk chemical analyses of major elements in rock and sediment. For ICP-OES laboratory analysis, the sample that is collected in the field must be transported to a lab, where it would likely then be placed in queue. This method also requires extensive sample preparation, which can add hours to the process and in some cases actually be hazardous. If samples are not found to be in compliance with a designated target, adjustments must be made and the test process repeated, further extending time to results. New portable ED-XRF instruments such as the SPECTROSCOUT have excellent analytical range and precision exhibiting very low limits of detection. Using this instrument onsite has been shown to reduce analysis times for substances such as sulfur from hours to minutes.

3 An alternative method, Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (ED-XRF) can provide lab quality analysis in the field, with minimal sample preparation. It provides accurate analysis for elements ranging from atomic number 11 (sodium) to atomic number 92 (uranium), which can shorten time to results from days to minutes. Samples prepared as loose dried powder can be analyzed easily in XRF sample cups for onsite applications without loss of precision or accuracy in comparison to the pressed powder technology typically used in a laboratory. Comparing lab and field based analyses The following tests were conducted in the field using a SPECTROSCOUT spectrometer, which is equipped with a transmission target X-ray tube (Rh target), a filter changer, a He purge system and a high resolution large area SDD. The resolution of the SDD used amounts to <155 ev (Mn Kα) at an input count rate of up to 200,000 cps. All measurements are done under He purge with low He consumption. Alternatively, the same performance can also be achieved when using a small portable vacuum pump. The components are packaged in a small cabinet with a footprint of 31 cm x 31 cm and a weight of about 12 kg. Table 1 shows the measurement parameters. Before measuring each spectrum of an unknown sample, the shutter of the instrument is irradiated. This enables calculation of the line energy-channel position function and the line width-line energy relation, which is used to correct any spectrometer drift. The analysis time can be optimized depending on the analytical requirements. For a complete screening of the listed elements a measurement time of 5 min. per sample is sufficient. Sample preparation Only international standard reference materials were used for this report. In general, the samples have to be crushed and ground to get an average particle size of < 60 µm and dried. 5 g of the dried powder was poured into a plastic cup with an outer diameter of 32 mm and closed with a 4 µm thick poly-propylene foil. With an optional sample spinner the cups can be rotated during measurement. Table 1: Measurement conditions s Tube anode Tube voltage [kv] Meas. Time [s] (Na, Mg), Al Cl Rh 11 90 300 K Zn; Ta W Rh 30 180 300 Ga Zr, Hg U Rh 45 250...300 Nb Ba Rh 50 300 (Measurement time = clock time; live time is about half of the given measurement time)

4 Calibration Calibration for major, minor and trace elements was performed by measuring a series of international reference materials, like rocks, soils, industrial and domestic sludge, ores from various sources like: NIST, IRMM, USGS, CRPG, GBW, AMIS, SARM, and others. Table 2 summarizes the calibration data and limits of detection. This method allows the analysis of all elements given in Table 2 in different matrices covered by the listed standards. The concentration of the observed element should be 10 times higher than the detection limit when using the following equation: LOD: Limit of Detection ROI: Region of Interest N: Counts of an element specific line of a standard within a ROI having a width of 1.1 * FWHM B: Background behind the line within the same ROI C 0 : Concentration of the observed element in the standard Matrix effects and line overlaps might increase the detection limits given in Table 2 due to various factors (e.g., Co traces in iron-rich samples). Table 2: Calibrated concentration range and limits of detection (3 sigma); based on an overall measurement time of 15 minutes LOD [mg/kg] in SiO2 Calibrated Concentration Range [mg/kg] Al 2 O 3 300 < 600,000 SiO 2 < 1,000,000 P 2 O 5 120 < 340,000 S 40 < 280,000 Cl 100 < 10,000 K 2 O 40 < 130,000 CaO 30 < 500,000 Ti 12 < 20,000 V 8 < 3000 Cr 5 < 20,000 Mn 3 < 10,000 Fe 2 O 3 4 < 550,000 Co (K β ) 4 < 200 Ni 0.9 < 12,000 Cu 0.8 < 50,000 Zn 0.7 < 100,000 Ga 0.8 < 100 As 0.5 < 11,000 Se 0.3 < 20 Br 0.3 < 70 Rb 0.3 < 8,500 Sr 0.4 < 50,000 Y 0.5 < 700 Zr 0.5 < 1,500 Nb 0.4 < 3,500 Mo 0.4 < 2,500 Cd 1.8 <100 In 2.5 < 200 Sn 3.3 < 7,000 Sb 3.7 < 200 Te 6.0 < 10 I 8.0 < 20 Cs 10.6 < 600 Ba 12 < 60,000 Ta 2.3 < 9,000 W 1.5 < 500 Hg 0.9 < 30 Tl 0.7 < 30 Pb (L β ) 0.7 < 4,000 Bi 0.7 < 50 Th 0.8 < 1,000 U 1.0 < 1600

5 Analytical Performance The excellent performance of the SPECTROSCOUT can be shown in this multi-element application. Analytical results for three different reference materials in comparison to the certified values are given in tables 3-5. Table 3: Analytical results including counting statistical error (GSS-6, soil). Unit Measured Al 2 O 3 % 24.82 ± 0.05 21.23 ± 0.25 SiO 2 % 49.31 ± 0.04 56.93 ± 0.27 S mg/kg 176 ± 16 260 ± 50 Cl mg/kg < 80 98 ± 20 K 2 O % 1.53 ± 0.01 1.70 ± 0.08 CaO % 0.19 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.04 Ti mg/kg 4387 ± 21 4390 ± 180 V mg/kg 101 ± 4 130 ± 11 Cr mg/kg 66 ± 4 75 ± 8 Mn mg/kg 1563 ± 7 1450 ± 130 Fe 2 O 3 % 8.41 ± 0.01 8.09 ± 0.19 Co mg/kg < 25 7.6 ± 1.7 Ni mg/kg 58 ± 1 53 ± 5 Cu mg/kg 451 ± 2 390 ± 22 Zn mg/kg 90 ± 1 97 ± 9 As mg/kg 273 ± 2 220 ± 21 Rb mg/kg 226 ± 1 237 ± 12 Sr mg/kg 36 ± 1 39 ± 6 Y mg/kg 21 ± 1 19 ± 3 Zr mg/kg 205 ± 1 220 ± 22 Cd mg/kg < 2.3 0.13 ± 0.04 Sn mg/kg 56 ± 1 72 ± 10 Ba mg/kg 85 ± 7 10.8 ± 0.7 Ta mg/kg < 11 5.3 ± 0.6 W mg/kg 97 ± 2 90 ± 10 Pb mg/kg 305 ± 2 314 ± 20 Bi mg/kg 40 ± 1 49 ± 7 (95% confidence limit) of the reference material GSS-6 (soil) Table 4: Analytical results including counting statistical error (BCR 146R). Unit Measured Cr mg/kg 66 ± 4 75 ± 8 Mn mg/kg 1563 ± 7 1450 ± 130 Co mg/kg < 25 7.6 ± 1.7 Ni mg/kg 58 ± 1 53 ± 5 Cu mg/kg 451 ± 2 390 ± 22 Zn mg/kg 90 ± 1 97 ± 9 Cd mg/kg < 2.3 0.13 ± 0.04 Pb mg/kg 305 ± 2 314 ± 20 Al 2 O 3 % 5.61 ± 0.02 8.7 SiO 2 % 15.33 ± 0.2 22.15 P 2 O 5 % 6.31 ± 0.01 7.65 K 2 O % 0.62 ± 0.01 0.7 Fe 2 O 3 % 2.36 ± 0.01 1.95 (95% confidence limit) of the reference material BCR-146R; italicized values are not certified Table 5: Analytical results including counting statistical error (NIST 2782). Unit Measured Cr mg/kg 159 ± 1 109.0 ± 6.0 Ni mg/kg 161 ± 3 154.1 ± 3.1 Cu mg/kg 2356 ± 8 2594 ± 32 Zn mg/kg 1146 ± 5 1254 ± 196 As mg/kg 137 ± 3 166 ± 20 Cd mg/kg < 5 4.17 ± 0.09 Hg mg/kg < 5 1.10 ± 0.19 Pb mg/kg 549 ± 3 574 ± 11 Al % 0.92 ± 0.02 1.37 ± 0.09 Si % 17.3 ± 0.1 20.3 P % 0.49 ± 0.01 0.50 ± 0.06 K % 0.39 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.01 Ca % 0.69 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.06 Fe % 27.3 ± 0.1 26.9 ± 0.7 (95% confidence limit) of the geological reference material NIST-2782; italicized values aren t certified

6 The accuracy of the measured concentrations for the light elements sodium, magnesium, aluminum, silicon, phosphorus and sulfur is limited by particle size effects caused by the differences in sample preparation technology of different producers and by mineralogical effects. Repeatability The repeatability of the SPECTROSCOUT was examined by analyzing the sample NIST 2782 ten times over one day. Table 6 shows the average concentrations and the standard deviation for the certified trace element content in the sample versus the certified values. The data in Table 6, for all certified elements, demonstrates the excellent precision of the SPECTROSCOUT for the environmental monitoring of heavy metals in industrial sewage sludge. Summary Field analysis using portable ED-XRF satisfies the needs of precision and detection limits for onsite analysis. It provides a fast, precise, accurate and economic solution for in-situ analysis of traces of minor and major elements for environmental monitoring, geochemical prospecting and mining applications using loose dried powders in plastic cups. References [1] Andermann, G. and J.W. Kemp; 1958; Scattered X-Rays as Internal Standards in X-Ray Emission spectroscopy ; Analytical Chemistry, Vol.30 (8), 1306-1309 Table 6: Results of a repeatability test for reference material NIST 2782 (industrial sewage sludge) Unit Measured Cr mg/kg 165 ± 9 109.0 ± 6.0 Ni mg/kg 159 ± 3 154.1 ± 3.1 Cu mg/kg 2495 ± 80 2594 ± 52 Zn mg/kg 1140 ± 25 1254 ± 196 As mg/kg 135 ± 4 166 ± 20 Cd mg/kg < 5 4.17 ± 0.09 Hg mg/kg < 5 1.10 ± 0.19 Pb mg/kg 552 ± 5 574 ± 11

Scoping out a portable ED-XRF system Although various portable or small ED-XRF spectrometers may implement the same technology, there will be vast differences in the performance, ease of use, and instrument suitability for the at-line application. Here are some of the factors to consider when specifying and comparing ED-XRF spectrometers: Performance. ED-XRF instruments used in the field must have dependable accuracy, repeatability, and sensitivity across a wide range of detection levels enabling precise analysis from high percentage amounts to trace element concentrations. Ease of operation. Consider who will be using this instrument as ease of use translates into greater productivity and lower training costs. Look for an intuitive interface, simplified software that interacts with a standard PC, and comes with predefined application packages and calibration tools. Cost. A portable ED-XRF instrument can cost as little as half that of a dedicated laboratory instrument. That s still a pretty solid investment. Be sure the system is designed for the application and is rugged enough to withstand operation in the field. Portability, compactness and integral power supply. Weight, design and transportability are all key factors in making the most of measurements in the field. If access to a power outlet might be a problem, be sure to specify an instrument that runs on batteries. www.spectro.com GERMANY SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH Boschstrasse 10 D-47533 Kleve Tel: +49.2821.892.0 Fax: +49.2821.892.2202 spectro.sales@ametek.com U.S.A. SPECTRO Analytical Instruments Inc. 91 McKee Drive Mahwah, NJ 07430 Tel: +1.800.548.5809 +1.201.642.3000 Fax: +1.201.642.3091 spectro-usa.sales@ametek.com Hong Kong (Asia-Pacific) SPECTRO Analytical Instruments (Asia-Pacific) Ltd. Unit 1603, 16/F., Tower III Enterprise Sq. No. 9 Sheung Yuet Road Kowloon Bay, Kowloon Tel: +852.2976.9162 Fax: +852.2976.9542 spectro-ap.sales@ametek.com Subsidiaries: u CHINA: Tel +86.10.8526.2111, Fax +86.10.8526.2141, spectro-china.info@ametek.com, u FRANCE: Tel +33.1.3068.8970, Fax +33.1.3068.8999, spectro-france.sales@ametek.com, u GREAT BRITAIN: Tel +44.1162.462.950, Fax +44.1162.740.160, spectro-uk.sales@ametek.com, u INDIA: Tel +91.22.6196 8200, Fax +91.22.2836 3613, sales.spectroindia@ametek.com, u ITALY: Tel +39.02.94693.1, Fax +39.02.94693.650, spectro-italy.sales@ametek.com, ujapan: Tel +81.3.6809.2405, Fax +81.3.6809.2410, spectro-japan.info@ametek.co.jp, u SOUTH AFRICA: Tel +27.11.979.4241, Fax +27.11.979.3564, spectro-za.sales@ametek.com, u SWEDEN: Tel +46.8.5190.6031, Fax+46.8.5190.6034, spectro-nordic.info@ametek.com. uspectro operates worldwide and is present in more than 50 countries. For SPECTRO near you, please visit www.spectro.com/worldwide 2015 AMETEK Inc., all rights reserved, subject to technical modifications E-15, Rev. 0 Photos: SPECTRO Registered trademarks of SPECTRO Analytical Instruments GmbH : USA (3,645,267); EU (005673694); SPECTRO : EU (009693763)