The Colorado Climate Center at CSU. residents of the state through its threefold

Similar documents
Detecting Trends in Evapotranspiration in Colorado

Applications/Users for Improved S2S Forecasts

The Colorado Agricultural no Meteorological Network (CoAgMet) and Crop ET Reports

Let s Talk Climate! Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University. Yampatika Seminar February 16, 2011 Steamboat Springs, Colorado

Tracking the Climate Of Northern Colorado Nolan Doesken State Climatologist Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University

CIMIS. California Irrigation Management Information System

2003 Moisture Outlook

Long-term Precipitation Trends in Colorado. Nolan Doesken Colorado State Climatologist Presented: Friday, December 12, 2008

Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook

Drought in Southeast Colorado

2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead

Vermont Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN) sites at Lye Brook and Mount Mansfield

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska

The TexasET Network and Website User s Manual

CoCoRaHS Monitoring Colorado s s Water Resources through Community Collaborations

Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado

5B.1 DEVELOPING A REFERENCE CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION CLIMATOLOGY FOR THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES USING THE FAO PENMAN-MONTEITH ESTIMATION TECHNIQUE

An Online Platform for Sustainable Water Management for Ontario Sod Producers

Eric. W. Harmsen Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Department, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Campus

November 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

Eric. W. Harmsen 1, John Mecikalski 2, Vanessa Acaron 3 and Jayson Maldonado 3

The Kentucky Mesonet: Entering a New Phase

September 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

Colorado s AMAZING Climate

North Carolina Climate July 2011

Evapotranspiration. Rabi H. Mohtar ABE 325

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

The Colorado Drought of 2002 in Perspective

Funding provided by NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Project CLIMATE. Basic Climatology Colorado Climate Center

Research Note COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR ESTIMATING CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION IN PUERTO RICO 1,2. J. Agric. Univ. P.R. 89(1-2): (2005)

Taking the Pulse of Colorado s Climate

Taking the Pulse of Colorado s Climate

Development of Innovative Technology to Provide Low-Cost Surface Atmospheric Observations in Data-sparse Regions

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

2002 Drought History in Colorado A Brief Summary

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

Estimating Summertime Evapotranspiration Across Indiana. Principal Investigators: Johnny Nykiel. Ryan Knutson. Jesse Steinweg-Woods

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System September 4, 2018

North Carolina Climate Variations

INTER-COMPARISON OF REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATED USING SIX METHODS WITH DATA FROM FOUR CLIMATOLOGICAL STATIONS IN INDIA

Midwest and Great Plains Drought and Climate Summary 20 February 2014

COOP Modernization: NOAA s Environmental Real-time Observation Network in New England, the Southeast and Addressing NIDIS in the West

The Climate of Bryan County

Local Precipitation Variability

Alberta Climate Information Service (ACIS) Definitions. Disclaimer. Overview

What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?

AgWeatherNet A Tool for Making Decisions Based on Weather

Innovative Sustainable Technology

N ew York State Agricultural Experiment S tation vnrfx* NYSAES I Publications I Latest Press Releases

AN INTERNATIONAL SOLAR IRRADIANCE DATA INGEST SYSTEM FOR FORECASTING SOLAR POWER AND AGRICULTURAL CROP YIELDS

Climate Change or Climate Variability?

Evapotranspiration and Irrigation Water Requirements for Washington State

The Climate of Payne County

Dependence of evaporation on meteorological variables at di erent time-scales and intercomparison of estimation methods

The Climate of Kiowa County

Memo. I. Executive Summary. II. ALERT Data Source. III. General System-Wide Reporting Summary. Date: January 26, 2009 To: From: Subject:

Quality Assurance and Quality Control

The Climate of Murray County

The Climate of Marshall County

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2016 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

Website Phone Mobile OVERVIEW Davis Vantage Pro2 Weather Station

The Delaware Environmental Monitoring & Analysis Center

The Climate of Grady County

A summary of the weather year based on data from the Zumwalt weather station

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System December 18, 2018

The Climate of Pontotoc County

PAM-Station Land-Owner Information Guide Project: CuPIDO, Tucson AZ, Jul/Aug 2006

CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2002

Making a Climograph: GLOBE Data Explorations

P1.34 MULTISEASONALVALIDATION OF GOES-BASED INSOLATION ESTIMATES. Jason A. Otkin*, Martha C. Anderson*, and John R. Mecikalski #

Range Cattle Research and Education Center January CLIMATOLOGICAL REPORT 2012 Range Cattle Research and Education Center.

Evapotranspiration forecast using SWAT model and weather forecast model

A Century of Meteorological Observations at Fort Valley Experimental Forest: A Cooperative Observer Program Success Story

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System October 17, 2017

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO Weather Station Monthly Summary Report

The Oklahoma Mesonet: Why We Did It & Lessons Learned (Its Value to the Citizens of Oklahoma)

Your Farm Weather Station: Installation and Maintenance Guidelines 1

Colorado weather and climate update: a bit more than halfway through the water year (Or: What s going on with the weather?? )

Microclimate. Climate & scale. Measuring a Microclimate Microclimates VARY. Microclimate factors. Aboveground environment.

The Climate of Seminole County

Regional Precipitation and ET Patterns: Impacts on Agricultural Water Management

The Colorado Drought : 2003: A Growing Concern. Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center.

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System May 1, 2018

Table of Contents. Page

The Climate of Texas County

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

Appendix C. AMEC Evaluation of Zuni PPIW. Appendix C. Page C-1 of 34

Precipitation. Standardized Precipitation Index. NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System January 3, 2017

Applications. Remote Weather Station with Telephone Communications. Tripod Tower Weather Station with 4-20 ma Outputs

Meteorological Data recorded at Armagh Observatory from 1795 to 2001: Volume I - Daily, Monthly and Annual Rainfall

Evapotranspiration monitoring with Meteosat Second Generation satellites: method, products and utility in drought detection.

Promoting Rainwater Harvesting in Caribbean Small Island Developing States Water Availability Mapping for Grenada Preliminary findings

LE Accumulation, Net Radiation, and Drying with Tipped Sensors

2008 Growing Season. Niagara Region

Quality assurance for sensors at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 21, 2017

MxVision WeatherSentry Web Services Content Guide

Accessing and Using National Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Climate and Hydrology Data from ClimDB and HydroDB: A Tutorial

The Climate of Haskell County

Transcription:

The CoAgMet Network: Overview History and How It Overview, Works N l Doesken Nolan D k and d Wendy W d Ryan R Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University

First -- A short background In 1973 the federal government abolished the State Climatologist program nationwide leaving Colorado without Later that same year, Colorado re-established established the State Climate program with support through the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station at Colorado State University.

Our Mission The Colorado Climate Center at CSU provides valuable climate expertise to the residents of the state through its threefold program of: 1) Climate Monitoring (data acquisition, analysis, and archiving), 2) Climate Research 3) Climate Services.(providing data, analysis, climate education and outreach)

Monitoring our Climate Elements: temperature, precipitation, snow, wind, solar, evaporation, soil temperatures, humidity, clouds, etc. Fort Collins CSU Historic Weather Station Continuous monitoring since the 1880s

Vail Mountain Snotel

Montrose Annual Precipitation (1899 2011)

CoAgMet = Colorado Agricultural Meteorological Network

History of CoAgMet In the early 1990 s, CSU extension plant pathologists and USDA Ag. Research Service scientists decided to collaborate efforts to collect agricultural weather data. Standard automated instruments and data collection platforms were selected and a small network of stations was deployed in fully irrigated agriculture. As the network grew, the Colorado Climate Center became increasingly interested in using the data, began daily data collection, quality control and built a web interface to distribute data and products to users across the state.

CoAgMet 1992

CoAgMet 1997

CoAgMet 2002

CoAgMet Today

Overview Currently there are 65 stations Data are collected on hourly and daily time steps and include: temperature, humidity, solar radiation, wind speed and direction, and soil temperatures. Data and graphics are available online: ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/~coagmet t t coagmet

What do the stations measure?

Cup anemometer and wind vane: Wind speed, direction and gusts 2 m Above all else facing South Pyranometer: Solar radiation Temperature/Humidity sensor in radiation shield Solar panel powers the station 2 m 1-3 m Tipping bucket rain gage Data collection platform (DCP) -5/-15 cm Soil temperatures

Data Collection Platform Power supply Datalogger Communications device (cellular modem) Incoming sensor cables

Why these measurements? The main goal of CoAgMet is to calculate evapotranspiration (ET) from meteorological measurements. Several models exist that vary by input data and complexity: Penman-Monteith physically based Kimberly-Penman physically based Hargreaves empirical temperature based Standardized ASCE Equation attempts to standardize calculations to make them more comparable The standard d CoAgMet station collects the elements needed to calculate evapotranspiration.

Temperature/Humidity Temperature: During the growing season, higher temperatures during daylight hours cause the plant stomata to open more resulting in greater transpiration. Humidity: The higher the humidity the less transpiration will occur (more transpiration occurs in dryer air)

Wind Movement As air movement across plant canopies increase, higher transpiration rates occur as the saturated air (from transpiration) ti around the plant is mixed with and replaced by and dryer air.

Solar Radiation Alfalfa only reflects about 25% of incoming solar energy which leaves ample solar energy to drive ET rates. ET trends follow a similar pattern as seasonal solar radiation and air temperature.

Precipitation Precipitation data are not used explicitly in the ET equations, but precipitation data are essential in determining crop water needs Monitoring precipitation also provides an idea of soil moisture availability at the station.

Soil Temperatures Having the temperature of the soil aids in knowing when the soil has warmed enough to plant. Soil temperature also gives an indication of the amount of ground cover at the station.

CoAgMet example ET Data Growing season Alfalfa reference ET for 2011 growing season comparing an unirrigated site near Delta to a partially irrigated site near Olathe

Please note: CoAgMet instrumentation are high quailty and the CoAgMet data are easily accessibly..... However

Problems with CoAgMet Missing data Site exposure Routine maintenance

Missing/Questionable Data Due to various problems that occur to remote weather stations, missing data causes problems for users. Battery failure and communications problems are the most common. Even if the whole station doesn t fail, sensors go bad and can leave some elements missing until the station is serviced.

Unfortunately, data are not complete at all stations 250 200 Peckham, Mean Monthly Wind Run (May Sept) p) Missing Data 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Mean Wind Run (m mi) 150 100 50 0 March April May June July August September October Month

Some Data are Questionable 18.00 CSU Fruita Experimental Station, Monthly Vapor Pressure (1992 2006) 1992 1993 16.00 1994 14.00 1995 1996 Vapor Pressure ( mb) Vapor Pressure (mb) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 20.00 18.00 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 March April May June July August September October Month Lamar 01, Mean Monthly Vapor Pressure (1998 2006) 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Mean 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Mean Solar Radiation (Lgly) 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Avondale, Mean Monthly Solar Radiation (1992 2006) March April May June July August September October Month 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Mean 4.00 2.00 0.00 March April May June July August September October Month

Site Exposure One of the assumptions s of the evapotranspiration a at o equations is that water is not limited (i.e. in full irrigation). Some stations are not located in ideal reference conditions. Some stations have obstructions (buildings/crops) that affect the amount of wind in certain directions. The exposure of the site can have an impact on the data and over/under estimate reference ET.

Siting and Exposure The Good and the Not so Good FTC01 Fort Collins AERC has appropriate p citing for reference ET calculations HOT01 Hotchkiss is not ideally cited for reference ET calculations

Routine Maintenance Due to the fact that CoAgMet is run by collaborations and operates on a limited budget, routine maintenance is difficult with such a large network. There is no full time CoAgMet technician. Our goal is to visit each station once a year to make sure the station is operating properly. Sensor are swapped out once every 2 years. Data users should be cautious and thoroughly quality control the data they are using.

Possible Solutions? Efforts are being made to fill in missing data using relationships with nearby stations. This data would be flagged when presented on the website. Our website now color codes stations according to their irrigation are classified as: full irrigation, partial irrigation and dryland. Making this information available to the public allows them to know more about their data source.

Possible Solutions? We do our best with limited funds to keep a maintenance schedule but it is very difficult. If we are not able to keep high standards for our weather stations, some current stations may need to be discontinued in the near future.

CoAgMet Website Demonstration

The Colorado Climate Center Home Page http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/

Hourly Climate Data Plots Click Here

Hourly Climate Data Plots Temperature GLY03 Greely June 9, 2007 through h June 15, 2007 Relative Humidity

Click Here Daily Climatic Summary

Daily Climatic Summary

Monthly Station Summaries Click Here

Monthly Station Summaries KSY01 Kersey Aug. 2007

Daily Regional Climatic and ET Comparison Click Here

Daily Regional Climatic and ET Comparison North Central Region, May 30, 2007

Click Here Crop Specific ET Reports

Crop Specific ET Reports Calculates multi-day ET for: alfalfa, corn, dry beans, small grain, sugar beets, potatoes, t onion, winter wheat, turf grass, and reference ET, via Penman-Monteith or Kimberly-Penman

CoAgMet web access: http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu/~coagmet/