Hamilton description of plasmas and other models of matter: structure and applications I

Similar documents
Stability Subject to Dynamical Accessibility

Hamiltonian Dynamics: Integrability, Chaos, and Noncanonical Structure

Oh, That. P. J. Morrison. Department of Physics and Institute for Fusion Studies The University of Texas at Austin

On the Hamilton-Jacobi Variational Formulation of the Vlasov Equation

Hamiltonian Dynamics from Lie Poisson Brackets

MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURES IN CONTINUOUS DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS

What is macro? self-organized structures in physical systems

Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems

Variational principles and Hamiltonian Mechanics

Curves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,

BACKGROUND IN SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Symplectic and Poisson Manifolds

Eva Miranda. UPC-Barcelona and BGSMath. XXV International Fall Workshop on Geometry and Physics Madrid

Gyrokinetic simulations of magnetic fusion plasmas

Nonlinear MHD Stability and Dynamical Accessibility

Hamiltonian Fluid Dynamics

Dirac Structures and the Legendre Transformation for Implicit Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Systems

LIE ALGEBROIDS AND POISSON GEOMETRY, OLIVETTI SEMINAR NOTES

Balanced models in Geophysical Fluid Dynamics: Hamiltonian formulation, constraints and formal stability

Hamiltonian Dynamics

Invariants and Labels in Lie Poisson Systems

The Geometry of Euler s equation. Introduction

On the Continuum Hamiltonian Hopf Bifurcation I

arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 29 Sep 2016

1 Hamiltonian formalism

Dirac structures. Henrique Bursztyn, IMPA. Geometry, mechanics and dynamics: the legacy of J. Marsden Fields Institute, July 2012

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Dierential geometry for Physicists

Homework 3. 1 Goldstein Part (a) Theoretical Dynamics September 24, The Hamiltonian is given by

THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009

M3-4-5 A16 Notes for Geometric Mechanics: Oct Nov 2011

Dynamics and Stability application to submerged bodies, vortex streets and vortex-body systems

[#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum

Gravitation: Tensor Calculus

Dynamical systems on Leibniz algebroids

Gyrokinetic Field Theory without Lie Transforms

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

Poisson Manifolds Bihamiltonian Manifolds Bihamiltonian systems as Integrable systems Bihamiltonian structure as tool to find solutions

Hamiltonian aspects of fluid dynamics

Part II. Classical Dynamics. Year

HANDOUT #12: THE HAMILTONIAN APPROACH TO MECHANICS

Physical Dynamics (SPA5304) Lecture Plan 2018

The Toda Lattice. Chris Elliott. April 9 th, 2014

Geometric Gyrokinetic Theory and its Applications to Large-Scale Simulations of Magnetized Plasmas

Physical Dynamics (PHY-304)

arxiv: v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 3 Apr 2011

Konstantin E. Osetrin. Tomsk State Pedagogical University

0 Magnetically Confined Plasma

Action-angle coordinates and geometric quantization. Eva Miranda. Barcelona (EPSEB,UPC) STS Integrable Systems

Gauge Fixing and Constrained Dynamics in Numerical Relativity

ANALYTICAL MECHANICS. LOUIS N. HAND and JANET D. FINCH CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS

Electromagnetic spikes

A CRASH COURSE IN EULER-POINCARÉ REDUCTION

Copyright by George Isaac Hagstrom 2011

Synchro-Betatron Motion in Circular Accelerators

Unimodularity and preservation of measures in nonholonomic mechanics

FINAL EXAM GROUND RULES

Hamiltonian and Non-Hamiltonian Reductions of Charged Particle Dynamics: Diffusion and Self-Organization

Hamilton-Jacobi theory on Lie algebroids: Applications to nonholonomic mechanics. Manuel de León Institute of Mathematical Sciences CSIC, Spain

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

What place for mathematicians in plasma physics

The geometry of Euler s equations. lecture 2

On local normal forms of completely integrable systems

arxiv: v2 [math-ph] 5 Jul 2017

Reduction of Symplectic Lie Algebroids by a Lie Subalgebroid and a Symmetry Lie Group

Lectures on basic plasma physics: Hamiltonian mechanics of charged particle motion

Hamilton s principle and Symmetries

Total-f Gyrokinetic Energetics and the Status of the FEFI Code

Solutions of M3-4A16 Assessed Problems # 3 [#1] Exercises in exterior calculus operations

Workshop on Testing Fundamental Physics Principles Corfu, September 22-28, 2017.

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

Physics 236a assignment, Week 2:

An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem

SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND ELECTROMAGNETISM

SMR/ Summer College on Plasma Physics. 30 July - 24 August, Introduction to Magnetic Island Theory.

PHY411 Lecture notes Part 2

Physics 5153 Classical Mechanics. Canonical Transformations-1

Applications of Differential Geometry to Physics

Canonical transformations (Lecture 4)

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

A little taste of symplectic geometry

ISOMORPHISMS OF POISSON AND JACOBI BRACKETS

Gyrokinetic simulations of magnetic fusion plasmas

General relativity and the Einstein equations

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Common Hamiltonian structure of the shallow water equations with horizontal temperature gradients and magnetic fields

Invariant Lagrangian Systems on Lie Groups

PAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Cite as: P.J. Morrison, ``Hamiltonian Fluid Mechanics", in Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006) p. 593.

Physics 106b: Lecture 7 25 January, 2018

Symplectic maps. James D. Meiss. March 4, 2008

arxiv:solv-int/ v1 24 Mar 1997

COTANGENT MODELS FOR INTEGRABLE SYSTEMS

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

Geometric Mechanics and Global Nonlinear Control for Multi-Body Dynamics

Geometry and Dynamics of singular symplectic manifolds. Session 9: Some applications of the path method in b-symplectic geometry

CHIRAL FERMIONS & MASSLESS SPINNING PARTICLES II : TWISTED POINCARE SYMMETRY. C. Duval, M. Elbistan P. Horvathy, P.-M. Zhang

1. Electricity and Magnetism (Fall 1995, Part 1) A metal sphere has a radius R and a charge Q.

SOME OBSERVATIONS REGARDING BRACKETS AND DISSIPATION. Philip J.Morrison of Mathematics University of California Berkeley, CA 94720

PRINCIPLES OF PHYSICS. \Hp. Ni Jun TSINGHUA. Physics. From Quantum Field Theory. to Classical Mechanics. World Scientific. Vol.2. Report and Review in

Transcription:

Hamilton description of plasmas and other models of matter: structure and applications I P. J. Morrison Department of Physics and Institute for Fusion Studies The University of Texas at Austin morrison@physics.utexas.edu http://www.ph.utexas.edu/ morrison/ MSRI August 20, 2018 Survey Hamiltonian systems that describe matter: particles, fluids, plasmas, e.g., magnetofluids, kinetic theories,....

Hamilton description of plasmas and other models of matter: structure and applications I P. J. Morrison Department of Physics and Institute for Fusion Studies The University of Texas at Austin morrison@physics.utexas.edu http://www.ph.utexas.edu/ morrison/ MSRI August 20, 2018 Survey Hamiltonian systems that describe matter: particles, fluids, plasmas, e.g., magnetofluids, kinetic theories,.... Hamiltonian systems... are the basis of physics. M. Gutzwiller

Coarse Outline William Rowan Hamilton (August 4, 1805 - September 2, 1865) I. Today: Finite-dimensional systems. Particles etc. ODEs II. Tomorrow: Infinite-dimensional systems. theories. PDEs Hamiltonian field

Why Hamiltonian? Beauty, Teleology,... : Still a good reason! 20th Century framework for physics: Fluids, Plasmas, etc. too. Symmetries and Conservation Laws: energy-momentum.... Generality: Approximation: do one problem do all. perturbation theory, averaging,... 1 function. Stability: built-in principle, Lagrange-Dirichlet, δw,.... Beacon: -dim KAM theorem? Krein with Cont. Spec.? Numerical Methods: structure preserving algorithms: symplectic, conservative, Poisson integrators,... e.g. GEMPIC. Statistical Mechanics: energy, measure... e.g. absolute equil.

Today Natural Hamiltonian systems Unnatural Hamiltonian systems Noncanonical Hamiltonian systems

Action Principle Hero of Alexandria (60 AD) Fermat (1600 s) Hamilton s Principle (1800 s) The Procedure: Configuration Space/Manifold Q: q i (t), i = 1, 2,..., N #DOF Lagrangian (Kinetic Potential): L = T V L : T Q R Action Functional: S[q] = t1 t 0 L(q, q) dt, δq(t 0 ) = δq(t 1 ) = 0 Extremal path Lagrange s equations

Variation Over Paths S[q path ] = number First Variation (Fréchet derivative): δs[q; δq] = DS δq = d dɛ S[q + ɛ δq] ɛ=0 0 δq(t) Lagrange s Equations: L q i d L dt q i = 0.

Hamilton s Equations Canonical Momentum: p i = L q i inverse function theorem Legendre Transform: H(q, p) = p i q i L( q, q) ṗ i = H q i, qi = H p i, Phase Space Coordinates: z = (q, p), α, β = 1, 2,... 2N ż α = J αβ c H z β = {zα, H}, (J αβ c ) = ( 0N I N I N 0 N ), J c := Poisson tensor, Hamiltonian bi-vector, cosymplectic form symplectic 2-form = (cosymplectic form) 1 : ω c αβ Jβγ c = δ γ α,

Natural Hamiltonian Systems

Natural Hamiltonian Systems Natural Hamiltonian: H(q, p) = T (q, p) + V (q) Kinetic Energy: T (q, p) = 1 2 i,j m 1 ij (q) p i p j where m ij pos. def. mass matrix (metric tensor). Potential energy: V (q) = V (q 1, q 2,..., q N ) Equations of motion: q i = j m 1 ij p j and ṗ i = V q i for m ij constant.

Natural Hamiltonian Examples Mass spring systems, pendula, particle in potential well, etc. N-Body problem q i = (q xi, q yi, q zi ) Q R 3, i = 1, 2,... N H = N i=1 p i 2 2m i + N i,j=1 c ij q i q j where depending on sign c ij it represents attracting gravitational interaction (satellites, planets, stars,...), repelling electrostatic interaction (electrons), attracting electrons and ions (protons), collection of both in plasmas.

Unnatural Hamiltonian Systems

Unnatural := Natural Hamiltonian Systems Charged particle in given electromagnetic fields: m q = ee(q, t) + e c q B(q, t) where E, B electric and magnetic fields, respectively, e charge, m mass, c speed of light. Potentials: B = A E = φ 1 c A t Hamiltonian: H(q, p, t) = 1 2m p e c A(q, t) 2 + eφ(q, t)

Other Unnatural Hamiltonian Systems Interaction of point vortices in the plane H = c N ij=1 κ i κ j ln ( (x i x j ) 2 + (y i y j ) 2) Chaotic advection in two dimensions H = ψ(x, y, t), v = 0 v(x, y, t) = ( ψ/ y, ψ/ x), neutrally buoyant particle or dye moves with fluid. Stream function ψ. Magnetic field line flow (integral curves of B(x)) Other: preditor-prey, etc.

Chaotic Advection H. Swinney Lab circa 1989. Nontwist! del-castillo-negrete et al. Cyclonic (eastward) jet particle streaks dye

Particle in B-Field Equation of motion: m q = e c q B(q, t) Solution for B uniform:

Particle in B-Field Equation of motion: m q = e c q B(q, t) Solution for B uniform:

Particle in B-Field Equation of motion: m q = e c q B(q, t) Solution for B uniform: gyroradius: ρ g = mcv /(eb). gyrofrequency: Ω g = eb/(mc)

B-lines as Hamiltonian system If particles are tied to field lines natural to look at field line flow. If interested in confinement, then if field lines escape particle will. Use fields for confinement: Stellerator, Tokamak, etc. Also related are particle accelerators. Field line flow is Hamiltonian: Kruskal, Kerst, I. M. Gelfand, Morozov & Solov ev,... Cary and Littlejohn 1983

Tokamak Fields Superposition of dipole + toroid Tokamak

B-line Hamitonian for Straight Torus For simplicity remove metrical components and consider topological torus with cylindrical coords (r, θ, z) with z toroidal angle (long way aorund) θ poloidal angle (short way around): B = B T ẑ + ẑ ψ(r, θ, z) assures B = 0. B T = const >> B 1 way Integral curves of B(x): parametrize by z dr dσ = B dx dz = B x = ψ dy and Y dz = B y = ψ X ψ(x, Y, z) is the Hamiltonian. General system is 1.5 dof but integrable if ψ/ z 0 (becomes 1 dof) desired equilibrium state.

Surface of Section Symmetry breaking k

Early Symplectic Map

Early Symplectic Map (cont)

George Miloshevich $250

Universal Symplectic Maps of Dimension Two Standard (Twist) Map: x = x + y y = y k 2π sin(2πx) Standard Nontwist Map: x = x + a(1 y 2 ) y = y b sin(2πx) Parameters: a measures shear, while b and k measure ripple

Drifts: E and B Not Uniform Even for large B, particles don t follow field lines because of drifts. Drift Types: E B, B, curvature, polarization. Example B (recall ρ g 1/B): Reductions base on magnetic moment µ = m v 2 /(2B) being an adiabatic invariant.

Drifts: E and B Not Uniform (cont)

Drifts: E and B Not Uniform (cont)

Drifts: E and B Not Uniform (cont 2 )

Drifts - E and B Not Uniform (cont 2 ) Guiding center equations for transport. Hannes Alfvén. Hamiltonian system in noncanonical coordinates Noncanonical Hamiltonian systems. Kinetic theories on guiding centers etc. Drift kinetics and Gyrokinetics.

Noncanonical Hamiltonian Systems

Usual Geometry Dynamics takes place in phase space, Z (needn t be T Q), a differential manifold endowed with a closed, nondegenerate 2-form ω. A patch has canonical coordinates z = (q, p). Hamiltonian dynamics flow on symplectic manifold: i X ω = dh Poisson tensor (J c ) is bivector inverse of ω, defining the Poisson bracket {f, g} = df, J c (dg) = ω(x f, X g ) = f g z αjαβ c z β, α, β = 1, 2,... 2N Flows generated by Hamiltonian vector fields Z H = JdH, H a 0- form, dh a 1-form. Poisson bracket = commutator of Hamiltonian vector fields etc. Early refs.: Jost, Mackey, Souriau, Arnold, Abraham &Marsden

Noncanonical Hamiltonian Definition A phase space P diff. manifold with binary bracket operation on C (P) functions f, g : P R, s.t. {, }: C (P) C (P) C (P) satisfies Bilinear: {f + λg, h} = {f, h} + λ{g, h}, f, g, h and λ R Antisymmetric: {f, g} = {g, f}, f, g Jacobi: {f, {g, h}} + {g, {h, f}} + {h, {F, g}} 0, f, g, h Leibniz: {fg, h} = f{g, h} + {f, h}g, f, g, h. Above is a Lie algebra realization on functions. pointwise multiplication. Take f g to be Eqs. Motion: Ψ t = {Ψ, H}, Ψ an observable & H a Hamiltonian. Example: flows on Poisson manifolds, e.g. Weinstein 1983...

Noncanonical Hamiltonian Dynamics Sophus Lie (1890) Noncanonical Coordinates: ż α = J αβ H z β = {zα, H}, {f, g} = f z αjαβ (z) g z β, Poisson Bracket Properties: α, β = 1, 2,... M antisymmetry {f, g} = {g, f}, Jacobi identity {f, {g, h}} + {g, {h, f}} + {h, {f, g}} = 0 G. Darboux: detj 0 = J J c Canonical Coordinates Sophus Lie: detj = 0 = Canonical Coordinates plus Casimirs J J d = 0 N I N 0 I N 0 N 0 0 0 0 M 2N.

Flow on Poisson Manifold Definition. A Poisson manifold M is differentiable manifold with bracket {, } : C (M) C (M) C (M) st C (M) with {, } is a Lie algebra realization, i.e., is i) bilinear, ii) antisymmetric, iii) Jacobi, and iv) consider only Leibniz, i.e., acts as a derivation. Flows are integral curves of noncanonical Hamiltonian vector fields, Z H = JdH. Because of degeneracy, functions C st {f, C} = 0 for all f C (M). Called Casimir invariants (Lie s distinguished functions.)

Poisson Manifold M Cartoon Degeneracy in J Casimirs: {f, C} = 0 f : M R Lie-Darboux Foliation by Casimir (symplectic) leaves: Leaf vector fields, Z f = {z, f} = Jdf are tangent to leaves.

Lie-Poisson Brackets Coordinates: where c αβ γ J αβ = c αβ γ z γ are the structure constants for some Lie algebra. Examples: 3-dimensional Bianchi algebras for free rigid body, Kida vortex, & other? Infinite-dimensional theories - matter models: Ideal fluid flow, MHD, shearflow, extended MHD, Vlasov-Maxwell, BBGKY, etc.

Lie-Poisson Geometry Lie Algebra: g, a vector space with [, ] : g g g, antisymmetric, bilinear, satisfies Jacobi identity Pairing: with g vector space dual to g, : g g R Lie-Poisson Bracket: {f, g} = z, [ f z, g ] z, z g, f z g

Example so(3) Lie Algebra is antisymmetric matrices, or s = (s 1, s 2, s 3 ), a vector space with [f, g] = f s g s where is vector cross product. Pairing between s so(3) and f/ s g yields the Lie-Poisson bracket: {f, g} = s f s g s = ɛ αβγ s α f s β g s γ, where ɛ αβγ is the Levi-Civita (permutation) symbol, which denotes the structure constants for so(3). Casimirs (nested spheres S 2 foliation): C = s 2 1 + s2 2 + s2 3 Examples: spin system, free rigid body with Euler s equations

All Real 3D Lie-Poisson Structures Bianchi classification (cf. Jacobson) of real Lie algebras c α βγ = ɛ βγδ m δα + δ α k a β δ α β a γ, α, β, γ = 1, 2, 3 Class Type m a α A I 0 0 A II diag(1, 0, 0) 0 A VI 1 α 0 A VII 0 diag( 1, 1, 0) 0 A VIII diag( 1, 1, 1) 0 A IX diag(1, 1, 1) 0 B III 1 2 α 1 2 δα 3 B IV diag(1, 0, 0) δ3 α B V 0 δ3 α 1 B VI h 1 2 (h 1)α 1 2 (h + 1)δα 3 B VII h=0 diag( 1, 1, 0) + 1 2 hα 1 2 hδα 3

All Real 3D Lie-Poisson Structures (cont 2 ) Class A: Type IX Free rigid body, spin,... Type II Heisenberg algebra Type V III Kida vortex of fluid mechanics Class B:?

Showtime

All Real 3D Lie-Poisson Structures (cont 3 ) Orbits lie on intersection of Casimir leaves and energy surface. Singular equilibrium is at (R = P = 0, S 0).

All Real 3D Lie-Poisson Structures (cont 4 ) Type VI h< 1 governs rattleback system of Moffat and Tokieda. Chirality comes from equilibria that live on the singular set. Such equilibria need not have Hamiltonian spectra. Yoshida, Tokieda, pjm (2017) Rank changing is responsible for the Casimir deficit problem. Relationship to b-symplectic and presymplectic systems.

End Part I