PAijpam.eu SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS S.G. Sonchhatra 1, G.V. Ghodasara 2

Similar documents
Vertex Graceful Labeling-Some Path Related Graphs

K-Total Product Cordial Labelling of Graphs

Z 4p - Magic labeling for some special graphs

Modulo Magic Labeling in Digraphs

Volume 18 Figure 1. Notation 1. Notation 2. Observation 1. Remark 1. Remark 2. Remark 3. Remark 4. Remark 5. Remark 6. Theorem A [2]. Theorem B [2].

CCO Commun. Comb. Optim.

VASANTI N BHAT-NAYAK and UJWALA N DESHMUKH*

Every planar graph is 4-colourable a proof without computer

Complete subgraphs in multipartite graphs

THE CHVÁTAL-ERDŐS CONDITION AND 2-FACTORS WITH A SPECIFIED NUMBER OF COMPONENTS

The L(2, 1)-Labeling on -Product of Graphs

Some Star and Bistar Related Divisor Cordial Graphs

Radio Geometric Mean Number of Splitting Of Star and Bistar

The lower and upper bounds on Perron root of nonnegative irreducible matrices

On quasiperfect numbers

Amusing Properties of Odd Numbers Derived From Valuated Binary Tree

Statistical Mechanics and Combinatorics : Lecture III

Further Results on Pair Sum Labeling of Trees

Maximizing the number of nonnegative subsets

SL n (F ) Equals its Own Derived Group

NP-Completeness : Proofs

Double Layered Fuzzy Planar Graph

Edge Isoperimetric Inequalities

The Order Relation and Trace Inequalities for. Hermitian Operators

Anti-van der Waerden numbers of 3-term arithmetic progressions.

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 1 Mar 2014

Valuated Binary Tree: A New Approach in Study of Integers

Discrete Mathematics. Laplacian spectral characterization of some graphs obtained by product operation

On the correction of the h-index for career length

SUCCESSIVE MINIMA AND LATTICE POINTS (AFTER HENK, GILLET AND SOULÉ) M(B) := # ( B Z N)

Complement of Type-2 Fuzzy Shortest Path Using Possibility Measure

Problem Set 9 Solutions

Self-complementing permutations of k-uniform hypergraphs

Randić Energy and Randić Estrada Index of a Graph

Foundations of Arithmetic

Super Mean Labeling of Some Classes of Graphs

A New Refinement of Jacobi Method for Solution of Linear System Equations AX=b

Genericity of Critical Types

A Simple Research of Divisor Graphs

Square Difference Labeling Of Some Path, Fan and Gear Graphs

More metrics on cartesian products

The Jacobsthal and Jacobsthal-Lucas Numbers via Square Roots of Matrices

Discrete Mathematics

FACTORIZATION IN KRULL MONOIDS WITH INFINITE CLASS GROUP

Convexity preserving interpolation by splines of arbitrary degree

Odd-even sum labeling of some graphs

Determinants Containing Powers of Generalized Fibonacci Numbers

Existence of Two Conjugate Classes of A 5 within S 6. by Use of Character Table of S 6

Beyond Zudilin s Conjectured q-analog of Schmidt s problem

COMPOSITE BEAM WITH WEAK SHEAR CONNECTION SUBJECTED TO THERMAL LOAD

The internal structure of natural numbers and one method for the definition of large prime numbers

The binomial transforms of the generalized (s, t )-Jacobsthal matrix sequence

Stanford University CS359G: Graph Partitioning and Expanders Handout 4 Luca Trevisan January 13, 2011

ALGEBRA HW 7 CLAY SHONKWILER

Geometric drawings of K n with few crossings

SQUARE DIFFERENCE 3-EQUITABLE LABELING FOR SOME GRAPHS. Sattur , TN, India. Sattur , TN, India.

Some Concepts on Constant Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Graphs

On intransitive graph-restrictive permutation groups

On the energy of singular graphs

Calculation of time complexity (3%)

Dirichlet s Theorem In Arithmetic Progressions

On Graphs with Same Distance Distribution

College of Computer & Information Science Fall 2009 Northeastern University 20 October 2009

Finding Dense Subgraphs in G(n, 1/2)

Affine transformations and convexity

Google PageRank with Stochastic Matrix

Harmonic Mean Labeling for Some Special Graphs

HMMT February 2016 February 20, 2016

TAIL BOUNDS FOR SUMS OF GEOMETRIC AND EXPONENTIAL VARIABLES

STATIC ANALYSIS OF TWO-LAYERED PIEZOELECTRIC BEAMS WITH IMPERFECT SHEAR CONNECTION

Random DFAs over a non-unary alphabet

Case Study of Markov Chains Ray-Knight Compactification

Modelli Clamfim Equazione del Calore Lezione ottobre 2014

Inductance Calculation for Conductors of Arbitrary Shape

k-difference cordial labeling of graphs

A property of the elementary symmetric functions

Comparison of the Population Variance Estimators. of 2-Parameter Exponential Distribution Based on. Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method

Further Results on Square Sum Graph

Distribution of subgraphs of random regular graphs

THERE ARE INFINITELY MANY FIBONACCI COMPOSITES WITH PRIME SUBSCRIPTS

A new construction of 3-separable matrices via an improved decoding of Macula s construction

n ). This is tight for all admissible values of t, k and n. k t + + n t

Strong Efficient Domination in Graphs

HnUf> xk) = S0Jf(xk) (k = 1,..., «; j = 0,..., m - 1).

CHAPTER-5 INFORMATION MEASURE OF FUZZY MATRIX AND FUZZY BINARY RELATION

STEINHAUS PROPERTY IN BANACH LATTICES

General viscosity iterative method for a sequence of quasi-nonexpansive mappings

The Quadratic Trigonometric Bézier Curve with Single Shape Parameter

A combinatorial proof of multiple angle formulas involving Fibonacci and Lucas numbers

Graph Reconstruction by Permutations

Min Cut, Fast Cut, Polynomial Identities

Math 217 Fall 2013 Homework 2 Solutions

Ali Omer Alattass Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Hadramout University of science and Technology, P. O. Box 50663, Mukalla, Yemen

Simulated Power of the Discrete Cramér-von Mises Goodness-of-Fit Tests

A Note on \Modules, Comodules, and Cotensor Products over Frobenius Algebras"

FINITELY-GENERATED MODULES OVER A PRINCIPAL IDEAL DOMAIN

ON A DETERMINATION OF THE INITIAL FUNCTIONS FROM THE OBSERVED VALUES OF THE BOUNDARY FUNCTIONS FOR THE SECOND-ORDER HYPERBOLIC EQUATION

COMPARISON OF SOME RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN REDUNDANT SYSTEMS REQUIRING SUPPORTING UNITS FOR THEIR OPERATIONS

Linear Regression Analysis: Terminology and Notation

Assortment Optimization under MNL

Transcription:

Internatonal Journal of Pure and Appled Mathematcs Volume 113 No. 3 2017, 489-499 ISSN: 1311-8080 (prnted verson); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-lne verson) url: http://www.jpam.eu do: 10.12732/jpam.v1133.11 PAjpam.eu SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS S.G. Sonchhatra 1, G.V. Ghodasara 2 1 School of Scence R.K. Unversty Rajkot, INDIA 1 Government Engneerng College Rajkot, Gujarat, INDIA 2 H. H.B. Kotak Insttute of Scence Rajkot, Gujarat, INDIA Abstract: A (p,q) graph G = (V,E) s called sum perfect square f for a bjecton f : V(G) {0,1,2,...,p 1} there exsts an njecton f : E(G) N defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v), uv E(G). Here f s called sum perfect square labelng of G. In ths paper we derve several new sum perfect square graphs. AMS Subject Classfcaton: 05C78. Key Words: Sum perfect square graph, half wheel graph 1. Introducton We consder smple, fnte, undrected graph G = (p,q) (wth p vertces and q edges). The vertex set and the edge set of G are denoted by V(G) and E(G) respectvely. For all other termnology and notatons we follow Harary[1]. Sonchhatra and Ghodasara[4] ntated the study of sum perfect square graphs. Due to [4] t becomes possble to construct a graph, whose all edges can be labeled by dfferent perfect square ntegers. In [4] the authors proved that P n, C n, C n wth one chord, C n wth twn chords, tree, K 1,n, T m,n are sum Receved: December 28, 2016 Revsed: February 20, 2017 Publshed: March 28, 2017 c 2017 Academc Publcatons, Ltd. url: www.acadpubl.eu Correspondence author

490 S.G. Sonchhatra, G.V. Ghodasara perfect square graphs. In ths paper we prove that half wheel, corona, mddle graph, total graph, K 1,n +K 1, K 2 +mk 1 are sum perfect square graphs. Defnton 1.1. Let G = (p,q) be a graph. A bjecton f : V(G) {0,1,2,..., p 1} s called sum perfect square labelng of G, f the nduced functon f : E(G) N defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v) s njectve, uv E(G). A graph whch admts sum perfect square labelng s called sum perfect square graph. Defnton 1.2. The corona product G H of two graphs G and H s obtaned by takng one copy of G and V(G) copes of H and by jonng each vertex of the th copy of H to the th vertex of G by an edge, 1 V(G). Defnton 1.3. The mddle graph of a graph G denoted by M(G) s the graph wth vertex set V(G) E(G), where two vertces are adjacent f and only f ether they are adjacent edges of G or one s a vertex of G and other s an edge ncdent wth t. Defnton 1.4. The total graph of a graph G denoted by T(G) s the graph wth vertex set s V(G) E(G) where two vertces are adjacent f and only f (1) x,y V(G) are adjacent. (2) x,y E(G) are adjacent. (3) x V(G), y E(G) and y s ncdent to x. Defnton 1.5. Half wheel graph, denoted by HW n s constructed by the followng steps. Step 1: Consder a star K 1,n. Let {v 1,v 2,...,v n } be the pendant vertces of K 1,n and v be the apex vertex of K 1,n. Step 2: Add an edge between v and v +1, 1 n 2. Note that V(H(W n )) = n+1, E(H(W n )) = n+ n 2. Defnton 1.6. Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs such that V(G 1 ) V(G 2 ) = φ. The jon of G 1 and G 2, denoted by G 1 +G 2, s the graph wth V(G 1 +G 2 ) = V(G 1 ) V(G 2 )ande(g 1 +G 2 ) = E(G 1 ) E(G 2 ) J, wherej = {uv/u V(G 1 ) and v V(G 2 )}.

SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS 491 2. Man Results Observaton 1: If G = (V,E) s not sum perfect square graph, then ts supergraph s also not sum perfect square graph, but the converse may not be true. Fgure 1: A non sum perfect square graph K 4 wth sum perfect square subgraph K 4 {e}. In [4] Sonchhatra and Ghodasara posed the followng conjecture. Conjecture 2.1. AnoddsmplegraphGwth δ(g) = 3s not sumperfect square. Here we prove ths conjecture by usng the prncple of mathematcal nducton on number of vertces of the graph. Theorem 2.2. An odd smple graph G wth δ(g) = 3 s not sum perfect square. Proof. For any graph G = (V,E) wth V(G) = n, snce d(v) 3, v G, n must be even and n 4. We prove ths conjecture by usng prncple of mathematcal nducton on number of vertces n of graph G. Step 1. For n = 4, G = K 4 s not sum perfect square graph (See [4]). Step 2. Suppose the result s true for n = k, 4 < k < n. Step 3. Let G = (V,E ) be the graph wth V = k +1. H = G {v} s the graph wth k vertces, where v s any arbtrary vertex of G. By nducton hypothess, H s not a sum perfect square graph. Snce G s a supergraph of H, t s not a sum perfect square graph (Observaton 1). Theorem 2.3. C n K 1 s sum perfect square graph, n 3. Proof. Let V(C n K 1 ) = {u ;1 n} {v ;1 n}, where u 1,u 2,...,u n are successve vertces of C n and v 1,v 2,...,v n be the successve

492 S.G. Sonchhatra, G.V. Ghodasara vertces correspondng to n copes of K 1, E(C n K 1 ) = {e (1) = u u +1 ;1 n 2} {e (1) n 1 = u nu 1 } {e (2) = u v ;1 n}. We note that V(C n K 1 ) = 2n and E(C n K 1 ) = 2n. We defne a bjecton f : V(C n K 1 ) {0,1,2,...,2n 1} as f(u 1 ) = 0, { 4 6; 2 n f(u ) = 2 +1. 4n 4+4; n 2 +2 n. f(v ) = f(u )+1,1 n. Let f : E(C n K 1 ) N be the nduced edge labelng functon defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v), uv E(C n K 1 ). Injectvty for edge labels: For 1 n 2 + 1, f (e (1) ) s ncreasng n terms of f (u u +1 ) < f (u +1 u +2 ) and for n 2 + 2 n, f (e (1) ) s decreasng n terms of f (u u +1 ) > f (u +1 u +2 ). Smlarly f (e (2) ) s ncreasng for 1 n 2 +1 and decreasng for n 2 +2 n. Clam: {f (e (1) ),1 n 2 + 1} {f (e (1) ), n 2 + 2 n 1} f (e (1) n ) {f (e (2) ),1 n 2 +1} {f (e (2) +2 n}. We have Further It s clear that f (e (1) ) = ), n 2 { (8 8) 2 ;2 n 2. (8n 8+4) 2 ; n 2 +2 n 1. f (e (1) n 2 +1) = (4n 6)2,f (e (1) 1 ) = 2,f (e (1) n ) = 4. f (e (2) ) = { (8 11) 2 ;2 n 2 +1. (8n 8+9) 2 ; n 2 +2 n. (1) f (e (2) 1 ) = 1, f (e (1) 1 ) = 2 and f (e (1) n ) = 4 are three smallest edge labels among all the edge labels n ths graph. (2) {f (e (1) ),1 n} are even, {f (e (2) ),1 n} are odd.

SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS 493 (3) f (e n 2 +1 ) s larger than the largest edge label of {f (e (1) ),1 n 2 } and smaller than the smallest edge label of {f (e (1) ), n 2 +2 n }. Hence we only need to prove the followng. (1) {f (e (1) 1 );2 n 2 } {f (e (1) ), n 2 +2 n 1}. (2) {f (e (2) 1 );1 n 2 } {f (e (2) ), n 2 +2 n}. Assume f possble {f (e (1) 1 );2 n 2 } = {f (e (1) ), n 2 +2 n 1}, for some. = 8 8 = 8n 8+4 or 8 8 = 8 8n 4. = = 2n+3 4 or n = 1 2, whch contradcts wth the choce of and n as,n N. Assume f possble {f (e (2) 1 );1 n 2 } {f (e (2) ), n 2 + 2 n}, for some. = 8 11 = 8n 8+9 or 8 11 = 8 8n 9. = = 2n+5 4 or n = 1 4, whch contradcts wth the choce of as N. Hence f : E(C n K 1 ) N s njectve. So C n K 1 s sum perfect square graph, n 3. The below llustraton provdes better dea about the above defned labelng pattern. Fgure 2 : Sum perfect square labelng of C 6 K 1. Theorem 2.4. M(P n ) s sum perfect square graph, n N. Proof. Let V(M(P n )) = {v ;1 n} {v ;1 n 1}, where v s adjacent wth v +1, v and v +1, for 1 n 1. Here E(M(P n )) = {e = v v +1 ;1 n 2} {e(1) = v v ;1 n 1} {e(2) = v +1 v ;1 n 1}. We note that V(M(P n )) = 2n 1 and E(M(P n )) = 3n 4. We defne the bjecton f : V(M(P n )) {0,1,2,...,2n 2} as f(v ) = 2 2, 1 n, f(v ) = 2 1, 1 n 1.

494 S.G. Sonchhatra, G.V. Ghodasara Let f : E(M(P n )) N be the nduced edge labelng functon defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v), uv E(M(P n )). Injectvty for edge labels: For 1 n 2, f (e ) s ncreasng n terms of f (v v +1 ) < f (v +1 v +2 ), 1 n 3. Smlarly f (e (1) ) and f (e (2) ) are also ncreasng, 1 n 1. Clam: {f (e );1 n 2} {f (e (1) );1 n 1} {f (e (2) );1 n 1}. We have f (e ) = (4) 2, 1 n 2 and f (e (1) ) = (4 3) 2, f (e (2) ) = (4 1) 2, 1 n 1. f (e ) are even, 1 n 2 and f (e (j) ) are odd, 1 n 1, j = 1,2. Assume f possble f (e (1) ) = f (e (2) ), for some, 1 n 1. = 4 3 = 4 1 or 4 3 = 1 4 = 3 = 1 or = 1 2, whch contradcts the choce of, as N. So f : E(M(P n )) N s njectve. Hence M(P n ) s sum perfect square graph, n N. The below llustraton provdes the better dea of the above defned labelng pattern. Fgure 3 : Sum perfect square labelng of M(P 7 ). Theorem 2.5. T(P n ) s sum perfect square graph, n N. Proof. Let V(T(P n )) = {v ;1 n} {v ;1 n 1}, where v s adjacent wth v +1, v and v +1, 1 n 1. E(T(P n )) = {e = v v +1 ;1 n 2} {e(1) = v v ;1 n 1} {e (2) = v +1 v ;1 n 1} {e(3) = v v +1 ;1 n 1}. V(T(P n )) = 2n 1 and E(T(P n )) = 4n 5. We defne a bjecton f : V(T(P n )) {0,1,2,...,2n 2} as f(v ) = 2 2, 1 n, f(v ) = 2 1, 1 n 1. Let f : E(T(P n )) N be the nduced edge labelng functon defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v), uv E(T(P n )).

SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS 495 Injectvty for edge labels: For 1 n 2, f (e ) s ncreasng n terms of f (v v +1 ) < f (v +1 v +2 ), 1 n 3. Smlarly f (e (j) ) are also ncreasng, 1 n 1, 1 j 3. Clam: {f (e );1 n 2} {f (e (1) );1 n 1} {f (e (2) );1 n 1} {f (e (3) );1 n 1}. f (e ) = (4) 2, 1 n 2. For 1 n 1, f (e (1) ) = (4 3) 2, f (e (2) ) = (4 1) 2, f (e (3) ) = (4 2) 2. {f (e ),1 n 2}, f (e (3) ) areeven andf (e (j) )areodd, for1 n 1, j = 1,2,3. It s enough to prove the followng. (1) {f (e ),1 n 2} {f (e (3) ),1 n 1}. (2) {f (e (1) ),1 n 1} {f (e (2) ),1 n 1}. Assume f possble {f (e ),1 n 2} = {f (e (3) ),1 n 1}, for some. = 4 = 4 2 or 4 = 2 4. = 1 = 2 or = 1 4, whch contradcts wth the choce of, as N. Assume f possble {f (e (2) ),1 n 1} = {f (e (3) ),1 n 1}, for some. = 4 3 = 4 1 or 4 3 = 1 4. = 3 = 1 or = 1 2, whch contradcts wth the choce of, as N. So f : E(T(P n )) N s njectve. Hence T(P n ) s sum perfect square graph, n N. The below llustraton provdes the better dea of the above defned labelng pattern. Fgure 4 : Sum perfect square labelng of T(P 5 ). Theorem 2.6. HW n s sum perfect square graph, n N.

496 S.G. Sonchhatra, G.V. Ghodasara Proof. Let V(HW n ) = {v} {v ;1 n} and E(HW n ) = {e = vv ;1 n} {e (1) = v v +1 ;1 n 2 }. V(HW n) = n + 1 and E(HW n ) = n+ n 2. We defne a bjecton f : V(HW n ) {0,1,2,...,n} as f(v) = n, f(v ) = 1, 1 n. Let f : E(HW n ) N be the nduced edge labelng functon defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v), uv E(HW n ). Injectvty for edge labels: For 1 n, f (e ) s ncreasng n terms of f (vv ) < f (vv +1 ), 1 n 1. Smlarly f (e (1) ) s also ncreasng. The largest edge label of f (e (1) ) s smaller than the smallest edge label of f (e ), therefore {f (e );1 n} {f (e (1) );1 n 2 }. Hence the nduced edge labelng f : E(H(W n )) N s njectve. So HW n s sum perfect square graph, n N. The below llustraton gves the better understandng of above defned labelng pattern. Fgure 5 : Sum perfect square labelng of H(W 6 ) and H(W 7 ). Theorem 2.7. K 1,n +K 1 s sum perfect square graph, n N. Proof. LetV(K 1,n +K 1 ) = {v} {v ;1 n} {w}, where{v 1,v 2,...,v n } are the pendant vertces and v s the apex vertex of K 1,n and w s the apex vertex correspondng to K 1. Here E(K 1,n + K 1 ) = {e (1) = vv ;1 n} {e (2) = wv ;1 n} {e = vw}. Note that V(K 1,n + K 1 ) = n + 2 and E(K 1,n +K 1 ) = 2n+1. We defne a bjecton f : V(K 1,n +K 1 ) {0,1,2,...,n+1} as f(v) = 0, f(v ) =, 1 n, f(w) = n+1. Let f : E(K 1,n +K 1 ) N be the nduced edge labelng functon defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v), uv E(K 1,n +K 1 ). Injectvty for edge labels: For 1 n, f (e (1) ) s ncreasng n terms of f (vv ) < f (vv +1 ), 1 n 1. Smlarly f (e (1) ) s also ncreasng,

SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS 497 for 1 n. Clam: {f (e (1) );1 n} {f (e (2) );1 n} f (e). We have f (e (1) ) = () 2, 1 n, f (e (2) ) = (n++1) 2, 1 n and f (e) = (n+1) 2. The largest edge label of f (e (1) ) s smaller than the smallest edge label of f (e (2) ). If {f (e (1) ),1 n} = {f (e)} for some, then = n+1 or = n 1, whch contradcts wth the choce of, as N. Further the smallest edge label of f (e (2) ) s larger than f (e). Therefore {f (e (2) );1 n} f (e). So f : E(K 1,n +K 1 ) N s njectve. Hence K 1,n +K 1 s sum perfect square graph. The below llustraton provdes the better dea of the above defned labelng pattern. Fgure 6 : Sum perfect square labelng of K 1,3 +K 1. Theorem 2.8. K 2 +mk 1 s sum perfect square graph, m N. Proof. Let V(K 2 +mk 1 ) = {u 1,u 2 } {v ;1 m}, where {u 1,u 2 } be the vetex set of K 2. E(K 2 +mk 1 ) = {e = u 1 u 2 } {e (1) = u 1 v ;1 m} {e (2) = u 2 v ;1 m}. Here V(K 2 +mk 1 ) = m+2 and E(K 2 +mk 1 ) = 2m+1. We defne the bjecton f : V(K 2 +mk 1 ) {0,1,2,...,m+1} as f(u 1 ) = 0, f(u 2 ) = m+1 and f(v ) =, 1 m. Let f : E(K 2 +mk 1 ) N be the nduced edge labelng functon defned by f (uv) = (f(u)) 2 +(f(v)) 2 +2f(u) f(v), uv E(K 2 +mk 1 ). Injectvty for edge labels: For 1 m, snce f(v ) s ncreasng n terms of f (u j v ) < f (u j v +1 ), j = 1,2, 1 m 1.

498 S.G. Sonchhatra, G.V. Ghodasara Clam: f (e) {f (e (1) );1 m} {f (e (2) );1 m}. We have f (e) = (m+1) 2, f (e (1) ) = () 2, f (e (2) ) = (m++1) 2, 1 m. The largest edge label of f (e (1) ) s smaller than the smallest edge label of f (e (2) ). Also f (e) s larger than the hghest edge label of f (e (1) ) and smaller than the smallest edge label of f (e (2) ). Hence the clam s proved. So the nduced edge labelng f : E(K 2 +mk 1 ) N s njectve. So K 2 +mk 1 s sum perfect square graph, m N. The below llustraton provdes the better dea of the above defned labelng pattern. Fgure 7 : Sum perfect square labelng of K 2 +3K 1. 3. Concluson In ths paper a conjecture related to sum perfect square graph have been proved, a new graph called half wheel have been presented and varous sum perfect square graphs are found.

SOME NEW SUM PERFECT SQUARE GRAPHS 499 References [1] F. Harary, Graph Theory, Addson-wesley, Readng, MA, (1969). [2] J.A. Gallan, A dynemc survey of graph labelng, The Electroncs Journal of Combnatorcs, 18 (2015) 1-262. [3] J. Shama, Square sum labelng for some mddle and total graphs, Internatonal Journal of Computer Applcatons, 37 (2012) 6-8, do: 10.5120/4594-6548. [4] S.G. Sonchhatra, G.V. Ghodasara, Sum perfect square labelng of graphs, Internatonal Journal of Scentfc and Innovatve Mathematcal Research, 4 (2016) 64-70.

500