APMP supplementary comparison of absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation

Similar documents
Draft protocol of APMP.RI(I)-K8 Reference air kerma rate for HDR Ir-192 brachytherapy sources

APMP key comparison for the measurement of air kerma for 60 Co (APMP.RI(I)-K1.1)

Comparison of national air kerma standards for ISO 4037 narrow spectrum series in the range 30 kv to 300 kv

Final Report on APMP.M.M-K4.1 - Bilateral Comparison of 1 kg Stainless Steel Mass Standards between KRISS and A*STAR

Comparison of V and 10 V DC Voltage References

International comparison of extrapolation chamber measurements of the absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation

Progress Report on Radiation Dosimetry Standards at NMIJ/AIST and Photon Energy Spectra Measured in Fukushima

A Correction Factor for Effects of Scattered X-rays at Calibration of Ionization Chambers in Low Energy X-ray Standard Fields

Ion-Chamber Survey Meter OD-02

Specific Accreditation Criteria Calibration ISO/IEC Annex. Ionising radiation measurements

Report on APMP Supplementary Comparison High precision roundness measurement APMP.L-S4. Final report

Instructions for Use for the transfer chamber and the electronic measuring device Revision 1

Survey Meter OD-01 Address: Phone: Fax: URL:

M [scale units/s] of the system

TITLE: Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and Simulation Studies on Cs-137

Supplementary Comparison EURAMET.EM-S19 EURAMET Project No. 688

Commissioning of the Beta Secondary Standard (BSS2)

Ionizing Radiation Metrology at NMIJ/AIST and ENEA-INMRI

C. Michotte 1, G. Ratel 1, S. Courte 1, Y. Nedjadi 2, C. Bailat 2, L. Johansson 3, Y. Hino 4. Abstract

High-Energy Photon Beam Therapy Dosimetry with Ionisation Chambers

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Comparison of the air kerma standards for 137 Cs and 60 Co gamma-ray beams between the IAEA and the NIST. Ronaldo Minniti 1 and Ladislav Czap 2

< Final report > Report on the APMP.M.F-S1 supplementary comparison for 2 MN Force

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K4 of the absorbed dose to water standards of the METAS, Switzerland and the BIPM in 60 Co gamma radiation

Abstract An indirect comparison of the standards for reference air kerma rate for

An extremity (wrist) dosemeter based on the Landauer InLight TM whole body dosemeter

FINAL REPORT ON KEY COMPARISON APMP.AUV.A-K3

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K3 of the air-kerma standards of the NRC, Canada and the BIPM in medium-energy x-rays

Final Report on Key Comparison APMP.M.P-K13 in Hydraulic Gauge Pressure from 50 MPa to 500 MPa

Hp(0.07) Photon and Beta Irradiations for the EURADOS Extremity Dosemeter Intercomparison 2015

A bilateral comparison of a 1 kg platinum standard

KCDB-Identifiers: EURAMET.RI(I)-K1.2 / EURAMET.RI(I)-K4.2 / EURAMET.RI(I)-K5.1. Pilot laboratory: BEV (AT) Andreas Steurer 1), Wilhelm Tiefenboeck

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Comparison protocol EURAMET project

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K7 of the air-kerma standards of the CMI, Czech Republic and the BIPM in mammography x-rays

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K3 of the air-kerma standards of the BEV, Austria and the BIPM in medium-energy x-rays

Final Report EUROMET PROJECT 818 CALIBRATION FACTOR OF THERMISTOR MOUNTS. Jan P.M. de Vreede

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K1 of the air-kerma standards of the LNE-LNHB, France and the BIPM in 60 Co gamma radiation

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures

Calibration of gauge blocks by interferometry. Final Report Results

Referensdosimetri. Crister Ceberg Medical Radiation Physics Lund University Sweden

Report on Key Comparison COOMET.AUV.A-K5: Pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones in the frequency range 2 Hz to 10 khz

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K1 of the air-kerma standards of the NIM, China and the BIPM in 60 Co gamma radiation

Report on EURAMET.M.M-S9

Appendix B1. Reports of SMU

AFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures

Activity measurements of the radionuclide 153 Sm for the ANSTO, Australia in the ongoing comparison BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Sm-153

ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER MEASUREMENTS IN HIGH ENERGY ELECTRON BEAMS USING DIFFERENT PLANE PARALLEL CHAMBERS *

Final Report. APMP.EM-K4.1 APMP Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf

GULF ASSOCIATION FOR METROLOGY. Calibration of Gauge Blocks by Mechanical Comparison Method GULFMET.L-S1

GMA STATISTICS Countries. Achievements of metrology HRD service for Foreign customers in 2018

Final Report on the APMP Air Speed Key Comparison (APMP.M.FF-K3)

Air Kerma Primary Standard: Experimental and. Simulation Studies on Cs-137. J. Cardoso, L. Santos, C. Oliveira

Measurement of Tritium in Helium

APMP Key Comparison of DC Voltage at V and 10 V

Extensions to the Beta Secondary Standard BSS 2 Consolidated version from

G. Ratel*, C. Michotte*, Y. Hino** *BIPM and **NMIJ, Japan

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Air Density Determination Using 1 kg Buoyancy Mass Comparison(III)

Clinical Implementation of the IPEM 2003 Code of Practice for Electron Dosimetry

BUREAU INTERNATIONAL DES POIDS ET MESURES

Metrology Principles for Earth Observation: the NMI view. Emma Woolliams 17 th October 2017

ASIA PACIFIC METROLOGY PROGRAME

TA3 Dosimetry and Instrumentation EVALUATION OF UNCERTAINTIES IN THE CALIBRATION OF RADIATION SURVEY METER POTIENS, MPA 1, SANTOS, GP 1

H Bjerke 1, J Plagnard 2, J-M Bordy 2, A Kosunen 3, J Huikari 3, L Persson 4, and P O Hetland 1

COMPARISON OF HUMIDITY MEASUREMENTS USING A DEW POINT METER AS A TRANSFER STANDARD APMP-IC-1-97 REPORT

ISO Radiological protection Sealed radioactive sources General requirements and classification

8/2/2012 UPDATING TG-51. When will it end? Part 1 - photon addendum. What are these updates? Photons: Electrons: More widespread revision required

CCT/10-21 Extrapolation of the ITS-90 down to the boiling point of nitrogen from the triple point of argon

Final Report on COOMET Key Comparison of Capacitance at 10 pf (COOMET.EM-K4)

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures

International Atomic Energy Agency. Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications. IAEA Environment Laboratories

Force Key Comparison APMP.M.F-K2.a and APMP.M.F-K2.b (50 kn and 100 kn) Final Report 6 August Pilot: KRISS, Republic of Korea Yon-Kyu Park

R SANAS Page 1 of 7

Introduction of RIC Tsukuba (Japan, RAII)

Recent Activities on Neutron Calibration Fields at FRS of JAERI

Force Key Comparison EUROMET.M.F-K2. (50 kn and 100 kn) EURAMET Project No 518. Final Report. 14 July Pilot: NPL, United Kingdom

Work Programme. of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures. for the four years Comité international des poids et mesures

Department of Radiation Protection, Nuclear Science Research Institute, Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

Final Report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K2)

Chemical Standard Department, 1600, Shimo-Takano, Sugito-machi, Kitakatsushikagun, Saitama , JAPAN

TEST-LOCATION SPECIFICATION BY MEANS OF HARDNESS MAPPING ON VICKERS BLOCK SURFACE

Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water

Recent Activities on Neutron Standardization at the Electrotechnical Laboratory

CCM short note on the dissemination process after the proposed redefinition of the kilogram

Comparison for Air Kerma from Radiation Protection Gamma-ray Beams with Brazilian Network /2017

Design, construction and characterization of a portable irradiator to calibrate installed ambient dose equivalent monitors

CCL-K5. CMM 1D: Step Gauge and Ball Bars. Final Report

Problem P7. Stéphanie Ménard. Dosimetry Department Fontenay-aux FRANCE IRSN QUADOS IRSN

APMP.QM-S3 Cd in Rice Powder

Technical protocol for the CCL-K11 key comparison of optical frequency/wavelength standards.

Comparison of measurement uncertainty budgets for calibration of sound calibrators: Euromet project 576

CCT Working Group for Humidity

Study on a thermal diffusivity standard for the laser flash method measurements 1

Document No: TR 12 Issue No: 1

Transcription:

APMP supplementary comparison of absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation BIPM KCDB: APMP.R(I)-S2 Technical Protocol N. Saito and M. Kato National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568 JAPAN 19 October 2012 1

1. Introduction The objective of this supplementary comparison is to establish the degrees of equivalence for the absorbed dose rate at 0.07 mm tissue depth for beta radiation [1] of the participating NMIs and to support the mutual recognition of calibration certificates for these qualities. The beta radiation fields of the radionuclides Sr-90/Y-90, Kr-85 and Pm-147 will be used for the comparison. Two transfer chambers will be calibrated by each of the participating laboratories for some radiation fields selected previously. The NMIJ/AIST is the pilot laboratory. 2. Participants The participants are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Participants in the comparison. Participant Institute Country Contact person (E-mail) 1 INER Taiwan Chien-Hau Chu (chchu1@iner.gov.tw) 2 KRISS Korea Chul-Young Yi (cyyi@kriss.re.kr) 3 Malaysian Nuclear Agency Malaysia Taiman Bin Kadni (Taiman@nuclearmalaysia.gov.my) 4 NMIJ Japan Masahiro Kato (masahiro-katou@aist.go.jp) Norio Saito (norio.saito@aist.go.jp) 5 OAP Thailand Vithit Pungkun (vithit@oaep.go.th) 3. Comparison procedure 3.1 Transfer chambers Two parallel-plate chambers of different type are to be used as transfer standards for the comparison, as listed in Table 2. The signal connections of the chambers are a tri-axial BNT plug for the Magna chamber and a BNC with a 4-mm banana plug for the CE-II chamber. The reference point of these chambers is the front surface of the detector case (NOT the surface of the thin film entrance window). A collecting voltage listed in Table 2, supplied at each laboratory, should be applied. Both polarities should be used for each chamber and the mean current evaluated. This voltage should be applied at least 30 minutes before starting measurements. A pre-irradiation of at least 30 minutes should also be made before any measurements. The leakage current should be measured before and after each measurement. Photographs of each chamber are presented in appendix B. Plastic cover of each chamber for protecting its entrance window shall be removed during the measurements. The Magna chamber is supported by its stem, 100 mm in length, 19 mm wide and 10 mm deep (in the beam direction). The CE-II is likewise supported by its cylindrical stem, 300 mm long and 12 mm in diameter. All stated dimensions are indicated in the photographs. The chambers are transported in an air tight box of around 500 mm height, 635 mm width, 305 mm depth, and weighing about 8 kg. It is important to note that the suggested connection for the Magna chamber requires the electrometer to operate in floating mode, the collecting electrode being at the polarizing potential. If the electrometer of the participant does not permit this, then the polarizing voltage must be applied to the outer electrode of the tri-axial connector, with the middle electrode connected to ground. In this case, care must be taken to avoid accidental contact with the connector. 2

Table 2. Technical data for the transfer chambers. Supplier EXRADIN OYOGIKEN Model Magna CE-II Serial number D070313 2803290 Outer diameter (mm) 53.4 130 Outer depth (mm) 20.8 39 Diameter of the 79 collecting electrode (mm) Depth of the collecting 8 9.5 volume (mm) Window foil material Window thickness Conductive Kapton film Al coated polyethyleneterephtalate 0.001 inch, 25 m, 3.86 mg/cm 2 3.54 mg/cm 2 Volume (cm 3 ) 3.0 60 Cable length (m) 1.2 Stem length (mm) 100 300 Stem size or diameter 19 x 10 12 in diamter (mm) Cable connection Tri-axial (BNT) Signal: BNC HV: banana plug Outer electrode Ground Ground Middle electrode Inner electrode 250 V (both polarities) Current measurement (at polarizing potential) NG Current measurement (Ground) banana plug NG 400 V (both polarities) 3.2. Reference conditions The reference conditions for the chamber calibrations are as follows: 1. Field size at the reference point: larger than 15 cm in diameter. 2. The variation of the dose rate over the field size at the calibration distance should be less than ± 5 % for 90 Sr + 90 Yand 85 Kr, and less than ± 10 % for 147 Pm. To achieve this, the sources should be used with suitable beam-flattening filters. Examples of the constructions of the beam-flattening filters are shown in ISO 6980-1:2006 [3]. If the variation is larger than ± 5 % for 90 Sr + 90 Yand 85 Kr, and ± 10 % for 147 Pm, corrections should be applied during the calibration of instruments and these factors given in the comparison report. 3

3. Air temperature, pressure and relative humidity of T = 293.15 K, P = 101.325 kpa and h = 65 %. 4. The calibration coefficients for the transfer chambers should be given in terms of the absorbed dose in tissue per charge, in units of Gy C -1. 5. The values of the half-lives to be used are: (10523 35) days for Sr-90/Y-90 (3915 3) days for Kr-85 (958.2 8) days for Pm-147 6. Calibration and Source-to-filter distances are listed in Table 3. Table 3 Calibration distances and source to beam-flattening filter distances. Radionuclide Calibration distance / (cm) Source-to-filter distance / (cm) Sr-90/Y-90 30 10 Kr-85 30 10 Pm-147 20 10 3.3. Measurements This comparison is performed for the calibration of an ionization chamber in terms of the absorbed dose rate in tissue, t (0,07; α ). The current measured by the chamber at laboratory ambient conditions should be corrected to the current at reference conditions (pressure: 101.325 kpa, temperature: 293.15 K, rel. humidity: 65 %) in the collecting volume. D Each participant should calibrate the transfer chamber in several beta reference fields of the radionuclides Sr-90/Y-90, Kr-85 and Pm-147 for the incidence angle of 0. As a minimum, all participants must take part with Sr-90/Y-90 (Table 4). Table 4 Measurement qualities. All participants must take part with the quality labelled A. The label B denotes optional qualities for the comparison. Radionuclide Incidence angle Label of the quality Sr-90/Y-90 0 A Kr-85 0 B Pm-147 0 B The calibration coefficient of the transfer chamber N in mgy/(h A) is given as the following equation: N D I c t (0,07; I c α ) / 2, where t (0,07; α ) is the conventional true dose rate at a depth of 0.07 mm in tissue in mgy/h for the angle of incidence α, measured with a primary standard and corrected to the ambient air conditions during the calibration measurements, and I + c and I - c are the ionization current in amperes at the two polarities, corrected to reference conditions. We note that the symbol I tc in the MS-Excel sheet (see section 3.6) is used to denote the ionization current before correction to reference conditions. D The comparison reference value C E (N n ) will be determined at each beta energy E as the weighted mean of the calibration coefficients N n of the participants. The weighting factor for each calibration factor N n will be its reciprocal of the variance, i.e. (1/u Nn ) 2. These reference 4

values C E (N n ) will be used to determine the degree of equivalence for each participating laboratory. 3.4. Structure of comparison There will be a star-shaped circulation of the transfer chambers between the NMIJ and the participants. The NMIJ will pay for the transport from NMIJ to the airport of the participant s country and, for the return, from Narita airport in Japan to the NMIJ. Each participant will pay for the transport from the airport of the participant s country to their institute and, for the return, from their institute to Narita airport. The participants should pay for the import custom duties. The chambers should stay at the participants site for no longer than 1 week. After each participant s calibrations, the NMIJ will perform chamber constancy checks by recalibrating both transfer chambers at all of the qualities. These data will form the basis of the uncertainty estimate for chamber stability entering in the data analysis. 3.5. Comparison schedule The comparison is scheduled to commence in July 2011 and the proposed schedule is shown in Table 5. Table 5. Proposed schedule for the comparison. Date of chambers Participant leaving NMIJ for participant Malaysian Nuclear Agency KRISS INER OAP 7-Jan-2013 3-Jun-2013 22-Jul-2013 28-Oct-2013 Measurement period at the laboratory 21- Jan-2013 to 25- Jan-2013 17-Jun-2013 to 21-Jun-2013 29-Jul-2013 to 2-Aug-2013 11-Nov-2013 to 15-Nov-2013 Date of chambers leaving participant for NMIJ 28- Jan-2013 24-Jun-2013 5-Aug-2013 18-Nov-2013 Notes: 1. The time allowed for measurements for each participant is one week. 2. Allowance is made for a transportation time for the chambers of about two weeks. 3.6 Submission of calibration results It is expected that all participating laboratories will submit their calibration results within 6 weeks of calibration. An MS-Excel sheet will be provided by the pilot laboratory in which information on the participants radiation qualities, primary standards and calibration results can be submitted. 3.7 Evaluation of measurement uncertainty All participating laboratories are required to evaluate the uncertainty of their calibration coefficients as Type A and Type B according to the criteria given in the Guide to The Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement issued by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 1995 4. The Type A uncertainty is obtained by the statistical analysis of a series of observations; the Type B uncertainty is obtained by means other than the statistical analysis of series of observations. The participating laboratories submit to the 5

pilot laboratory their detailed uncertainty budgets (with relative standard uncertainties, k = 1). An MS-Excel sheet will be provided by the pilot laboratory in which the participants can detail the uncertainty. The sheet should be submitted together with the calibration results. 3.8 Comparison report The pilot laboratory will prepare a draft report for circulation to all participants for comments and discussion of the results. A revised final report will be submitted to the APMP/TCRI Chairman and to the CCRI(I). After the agreement of the APMP and the CCRI(I), the report will be published as the Technical Supplement in Metrologia. In addition, the comparison report will be sent to the BIPM for inclusion in the key comparison database (KCDB). 4. References [1] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6980-2, 2004 Nuclear energy -- Reference beta-particle radiation -- Part 2: Calibration fundamentals related to basic quantities characterizing the radiation field [ [2] Schötzig, U. and Schrader, H. Halbwertszeiten und Photonen-Emissionswahrscheinlichkeiten von häufig verwendeten Radionukliden PTB-report Ra-16/6 (2000) [3] International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6980-1, 2006 Nuclear energy -- Reference beta-particle radiation -- Part 1: Methods of production 4 Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, International Organization of Standards, Switzerland (1995) 6

Appendix A Addresses of the participants Pilot laboratory NMIJ National Metrology Institute of Japan NMIJ National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, AIST Quantum Radiation Division 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568 Japan http://www.nmij.jp/ contact person: Masahiro Kato Tel.: +81-29-861-4273 Fax: +81-29-861-5673 e-mail: masahiro-katou@aist.go.jp Norio Saito Tel.: +81-29-861-5656 Fax: +81-29-861-5673 e-mail: norio.saito@aist.go.jp Participants INER Institute of Nuclear Energy Research Health Physics Division No.1000, Wunhua Rd., Jiaan Village, Longtan Township,Taoyuan County, 32546, Taiwan(R.O.C.) Contact person : Dr. Chien-Hau Chu Tel: +886 3 471 1400 EXT7673 Fax: +886 3 471 3489 e-mail: chchu1@iner.gov.tw KRISS Center for Ionizing Radiation Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS) 267 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-340 Korea Contact person : Dr. Chul-Young Yi Tel: +82 42 868 5370 or +82 10 3452 4307 Fax: +82 42 868 5671 e-mail: cyyi@kriss.re.kr Nuclear Malaysia Malaysian Nuclear Agency (Nuclear Malaysia) Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia Contact person: Mr. Taiman Bin Kadni Tel.: +603-8925 0510 ext 1260 or +603-8928 2983 (direct) Fax: +603 8925 0575 e-mail: taiman@nuclearmalaysia.gov.my 7

OAP Office of Atoms for Peace 16 Vibhavadi Rangsit Road, Laadyaw, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900 Thailand Contact person: Mr.Thongchai Soodprasert Tel: + 66-25967600 ext. 1425 Fax: +66 2562 0093 e-mail: thongcha@oaep.go.th 8

Appendix B Photographs of the chambers EXRADIN Magna 19 mm 100 mm 10 mm Oyogiken CE-II 300 mm 12 mm Center of the chamber 9