Periodic approximation of exceptional Lyapunov exponents for sem

Similar documents
PERIODIC APPROXIMATION OF EXCEPTIONAL LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS FOR SEMI-INVERTIBLE OPERATOR COCYCLES arxiv: v2 [math.

Limit theorems for random dynamical systems using the spectral method

THEOREM OF OSELEDETS. We recall some basic facts and terminology relative to linear cocycles and the multiplicative ergodic theorem of Oseledets [1].

MET Workshop: Exercises

Coexistence of Zero and Nonzero Lyapunov Exponents

SRB measures for non-uniformly hyperbolic systems

EXISTENCE OF CONJUGACIES AND STABLE MANIFOLDS VIA SUSPENSIONS

SOME EXAMPLES OF NONUNIFORMLY HYPERBOLIC COCYCLES. L.-S. Young 1

Lyapunov optimizing measures for C 1 expanding maps of the circle

THE MULTIPLICATIVE ERGODIC THEOREM OF OSELEDETS

A SPECTRAL APPROACH FOR QUENCHED LIMIT THEOREMS FOR RANDOM HYPERBOLIC DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS

A non-uniform Bowen s equation and connections to multifractal analysis

BOUNDEDNESS, COMPACTNESS, AND INVARIANT NORMS FOR BANACH COCYCLES OVER HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS

Continuous subadditive processes and formulae for Lyapunov characteristic exponents

CHILE LECTURES: MULTIPLICATIVE ERGODIC THEOREM, FRIENDS AND APPLICATIONS

A geometric approach for constructing SRB measures. measures in hyperbolic dynamics

Analysis III Theorems, Propositions & Lemmas... Oh My!

9 Radon-Nikodym theorem and conditioning

Physical measures of discretizations of generic diffeomorphisms

MULTIFRACTAL ANALYSIS OF CONFORMAL AXIOM A FLOWS

The generalized Berger-Wang formula and the spectral radius of linear cocycles

On Equivariant Block Triangularization of Matrix Cocyles

VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND MIXED MULTIFRACTAL SPECTRA

Symbolic extensions for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms

DIMENSION OF MEASURES FOR SUSPENSION FLOWS

Symbolic extensions for partially hyperbolic diffeomorphisms

Smooth Ergodic Theory and Nonuniformly Hyperbolic Dynamics

arxiv: v3 [math.ds] 12 Aug 2018

MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction

l(y j ) = 0 for all y j (1)

DIMENSION ESTIMATES FOR NON-CONFORMAL REPELLERS AND CONTINUITY OF SUB-ADDITIVE TOPOLOGICAL PRESSURE

A. Pikovsky. Deapartment of Physics and Astronomy, Potsdam University. URL: pikovsky

NON-STATIONARY NON-UNIFORM HYPERBOLICITY: SRB MEASURES FOR DISSIPATIVE MAPS

THE GEOMETRIC APPROACH FOR CONSTRUCTING SINAI-RUELLE-BOWEN MEASURES

TIME RESCALING OF LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS. Dedicated to Michael Rabinovich on the occasion of his 75th birthday. 1. Introduction.

SETS OF NON-TYPICAL POINTS HAVE FULL TOPOLOGICAL ENTROPY AND FULL HAUSDORFF DIMENSION

Entropy of C 1 -diffeomorphisms without dominated splitting

Selçuk Demir WS 2017 Functional Analysis Homework Sheet

HAMILTONIAN ELLIPTIC DYNAMICS ON SYMPLECTIC 4-MANIFOLDS

OPEN PROBLEMS IN THE THEORY OF NON-UNIFORM HYPERBOLICITY

arxiv: v1 [math.ds] 6 Jun 2016

1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016

Spectrum for compact operators on Banach spaces

COCYCLES WITH ONE EXPONENT OVER PARTIALLY HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS

Problemas abiertos en dinámica de operadores

Unique equilibrium states for geodesic flows in nonpositive curvature

It follows from the above inequalities that for c C 1

University of York. Extremality and dynamically defined measures. David Simmons. Diophantine preliminaries. First results. Main results.

POINTWISE DIMENSION AND ERGODIC DECOMPOSITIONS

HADAMARD PERRON THEOREMS AND EFFECTIVE HYPERBOLICITY

CONTINUITY OF LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS FOR RANDOM 2D MATRICES

HYPERBOLICITY AND RECURRENCE IN DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS: A SURVEY OF RECENT RESULTS

DIFFEOMORPHISMS WITH POSITIVE METRIC ENTROPY

PARTIAL HYPERBOLICITY, LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS AND STABLE ERGODICITY

ABSOLUTE CONTINUITY OF FOLIATIONS

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

Lecture 11 Hyperbolicity.

REGULARITY OF FOLIATIONS AND LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS OF PARTIALLY HYPERBOLIC DYNAMICS ON 3 TORUS

Bounds for (generalised) Lyapunov exponents for random products of shears

MEASURE RIGIDITY BEYOND UNIFORM HYPERBOLICITY: INVARIANT MEASURES FOR CARTAN ACTIONS ON TORI

SRB MEASURES FOR AXIOM A ENDOMORPHISMS

Lebesgue Integration on R n

TECHNIQUES FOR ESTABLISHING DOMINATED SPLITTINGS

SYMBOLIC DYNAMICS FOR HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS. 1. Introduction (30min) We want to find simple models for uniformly hyperbolic systems, such as for:

MA677 Assignment #3 Morgan Schreffler Due 09/19/12 Exercise 1 Using Hölder s inequality, prove Minkowski s inequality for f, g L p (R d ), p 1:

Periodic Sinks and Observable Chaos

The Banach Tarski Paradox and Amenability Lecture 20: Invariant Mean implies Reiter s Property. 11 October 2012

3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

Bounds for (generalised) Lyapunov exponents for deterministic and random products of shears

INVERSE FUNCTION THEOREM and SURFACES IN R n

Potential Theory on Wiener space revisited

Thermodynamics for discontinuous maps and potentials

Introduction and Preliminaries

GLOBAL RIGIDITY OF HIGHER RANK ANOSOV ACTIONS ON TORI AND NILMANIFOLDS

The continuity method

Isodiametric problem in Carnot groups

COHOMOLOGY OF FIBER BUNCHED COCYCLES OVER HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES: COMPACT SETS AND FINITE-DIMENSIONAL SPACES. 1. Compact Sets

Adapted metrics for dominated splittings

Remarks concerning the Lyapunov exponents of linear cocycles

Entropy, volume growth and SRB measures for Banach space mappings

CENTER LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS IN PARTIALLY HYPERBOLIC DYNAMICS

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

Problem: A class of dynamical systems characterized by a fast divergence of the orbits. A paradigmatic example: the Arnold cat.

ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSION FOR THE INTEGRAL MIXED SPECTRUM OF THE BASIN OF ATTRACTION OF INFINITY FOR THE POLYNOMIALS z(z + δ)

April 13, We now extend the structure of the horseshoe to more general kinds of invariant. x (v) λ n v.

The Gram matrix in inner product modules over C -algebras

7 Complete metric spaces and function spaces

SURVEY Ergodic optimization in dynamical systems

It follows from the above inequalities that for c C 1

MATH 263: PROBLEM SET 1: BUNDLES, SHEAVES AND HODGE THEORY

Lyapunov Exponents and Invariant Manifold for Random Dynamical Systems in a Banach Space

2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?

LYAPUNOV EXPONENTS: HOW FREQUENTLY ARE DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS HYPERBOLIC?

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

Robustly transitive diffeomorphisms

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2008

LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONS IN HAUSDORFF DIMENSION ESTIMATES OF COCYCLE ATTRACTORS

Measurable functions are approximately nice, even if look terrible.

Compact operators on Banach spaces

Transcription:

Periodic approximation of exceptional Lyapunov exponents for semi-invertible operator cocycles Department of Mathematics, University of Rijeka, Croatia (joint work with Lucas Backes, Porto Alegre, Brazil) July 8, 2018

Preliminaries Let (M, d) be a compact metric space and let f : M M be a homeomorphism. We say that f satisfies the Anosov closing property if there exist C 1, ε 0, θ > 0 such that if z M satisfies d(f n (z), z) < ε 0 then there exists a periodic point p M such that f n (p) = p and d(f j (z), f j (p)) C 1 e θ min{j,n j} d(f n (z), z), for every j = 0, 1,..., n. We note that subshifts of finite type and Anosov diffeomorphisms satisfy this property.

Preliminaries Let X = (X, ) be an arbitrary Banach space and let B(X ) denote the space of all bounded linear operators on X. Finally, let A : M B(X ) be an α-hölder continuous map. We recall that this means that there exists a constant C 2 > 0 such that A(q 1 ) A(q 2 ) C 2 d(q 1, q 2 ) α, for all q 1, q 2 M. We consider a linear cocycle A over (M, f ) with generator A. Recall that for q M and n N 0, A(f n 1 (q)) A(q) for n > 0; A(q, n) = Id for n = 0.

Preliminaries Let µ be an ergodic f -invariant Borel probability measure. We have the existence of the largest Lyapunov exponent λ(µ) [, ) such that 1 λ(µ) = lim log A(q, n) for µ-a.e. q M, n n and of the index of the compactness κ(µ) [, ) such that 1 κ(µ) = lim n n log A(q, n) ic for µ-a.e. q M, where for T B(X ), T ic is the infimum over all r > 0 such that T (B X (0, 1)) can be covered by finitely many open balls of radius r.

Lyapunov exponents We assume that the cocycle A is quasicompact which means that κ(µ) < λ(µ). Then, we have the following: there exists l N { } and a sequence of numbers (λ i (µ)) l i=1 such that λ(µ) = λ 1 (µ) > λ 2 (µ) >... λ i (µ) > κ(µ). If l =, then λ i (µ) κ(µ); there exists a Borel measurable R µ M such that µ(r µ ) = 1 and for each q R µ and i N [1, l] a measurable decomposition

Lyapunov exponents i X = E j (q) V i+1 (q), j=1 where E j (q) are finite-dimensional subspaces of X, A(q)E j (q) = E j (f (q)) and A(q)V i+1 (q) V i+1 (f (q)). for q R µ and v E j (q) \ {0}, 1 lim n n log A(q, n)v = λ j(µ). Furthermore, for v V i+1 (q) we have that lim sup n 1 n log A(q, n)v λ i+1(µ).

Lyapunov exponents The numbers λ i (µ) are called Lyapunov exponents of the cocycle A with respect to µ. Furthermore, subspaces E i (q) are called Oseledets subspaces of A w.r.t. µ. The number d i (µ) := dim E i (q) is the multiplicity of the exponent λ i (q). Those conclusions are ensured by the version of MET established by Froyland, Lloyd and Quas building on the earlier work of Ruelle, Mañé, Thieullen, Lian and Lu. Further extensions/alternative proofs: Blumenthal, González-Tokman-Quas.

Main result We will denote by γ 1 (µ) γ 2 (µ)... Lyapunov exponents of A with respect to µ counted with their multiplicities. For example, γ i (µ) = λ 1 (µ) for i = 1,..., d 1 (µ). Theorem For s N [1, l] there exist a sequence of periodic points (p k ) k such that lim γ i(p k ) = γ i (µ), k for i {1,..., d 1 (µ) +... + d s (µ)}.

Previous work X finite-dimensional and A(q) invertible: Kalinin; X finite-dimensional and A(q) not necessarily invertible: Backes; X Banach space and A(q) invertible: Kalinin and Sadovskaya; Basis (M, f ) nonuniformly hyperbolic system: Kalinin and Sadovskaya. Also, Kalinin and Sadovskaya showed that without quasicompactness we don t have desired approximation of the largest Lyapunov exponent.

Idea of the proof Step 1: Lyapunov norms For each q R µ, we have the decomposition X = E 1 (q)... E s (q) V s+1 (q). For q R µ and δ > 0 sufficiently small we can construct a norm q on X such that: e (λ i δ)n u q A(q, n)u f n (q) e (λ i +δ)n u q for n N and u E i (q); A(q, n)u f n (q) e (λs δ)n u q for n N and u V s+1 (q); A(q, n)u f n (q) e (λ1+δ)n u q for n N and u X ;

Idea of the proof there exists a Borel-measurable function K δ : R µ (0, ) such that u u q K δ (q) u, for q R µ and u X ; for q R µ and n N, K δ (q)e δn K δ (f n (q)) e δn K δ (q). q depends measurably on q; For N N, let R µ δ,n be the set of all q Rµ such that K δ (q) N. WLOG: this is a compact set and Lyapunov norm and Osel. splitting depend continuously on it.

Step 2: There exist q R µ δ,n and a sequence (p k) k of periodic points (n k =period of p k ) d(f j (q), f j (p k )) small for 1 j n k and k N, f n k (q) B(q, 1 k ) Rµ δ,n, and µ pk µ, where µ pk = 1 n k 1 n k j=0 δ f j (p k ). Step 3: We have lim sup(γ 1 (p k ) +... γ i (p k )) γ 1 (µ) +... + γ i (µ), k for i {1,..., d 1 (µ) +... d s (µ)}.

Idea of the proof For k N, 1 j n k and γ [0, 1), set { } Cγ j,1 = u+v E 1 (f j (q)) V 2 (f j (q)) : v f j (q) (1 γ) u f j (q). Step 4: For 1 j n k and u C j,1 0, ((A(f j (p k ))u)) j+1 E f j+1 (q) e λ1 2δ u j E f j (q). Moreover, for k large, there exist γ (0, 1) such that A(f j (p k )(C j,1 0 ) C j+1,1 γ.

For k large, C n k,1 γ C 0,1 0 and thus A(p k, n k )C 0,1 0 C 0,1 0. Then, A(p k, n k )u f n k (q) 1 2 en k(λ 1 2δ) u q 1 4 en k(λ 1 2δ) u f n k (q), for u C 0,1 0. Step 5: Let λ(p k, u) λ 1 3δ for u C 0,1 0. i k := max{i : V i (p k ) C 0,1 0 {0}}. Then, λ i k (p k ) λ 1 3δ.

Step 6: For large k, we have that dim(e 1 (p k )... E i k (p k )) = dim E 1 (q). Then, and thus γ i (p k ) γ i (µ) 3δ for i = 1,..., d 1 (µ). γ i (p k ) γ i (µ) for i = 1,..., d 1 (µ). Next, using X = E 1 (f j (q)) E 2 (f j (q)) V 3 (f j (q)), { u X : u V f j (q) (1 γ) u E2 f j (q)) C j,2 γ := }.

Application Theorem Assume that A is quasicompact w.r.t. every ergodic f -invariant Borel probability measure µ and that there exists c > 0 such that λ(p) c for each periodic p M. Then, there exists D, λ > 0 such that A(q, n) De λn for q M and n N.