Mapping class groups of surfaces and quantization

Similar documents
2-DIMENSIONAL TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM FIELD THEORIES AND FROBENIUS ALGEBRAS. Contents 1. The main theorem 1

THEp 1 -CENTRALEXTENSIONOF THE MAPPING CLASS GROUP OF ORIENTABLE SURFACES

Vassiliev Invariants, Chord Diagrams, and Jacobi Diagrams

Vector fields on the plane

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 5 Oct 1999

Groupoid Representation Theory

Quantum Groups and Link Invariants

FROM CLASSICAL THETA FUNCTIONS TO TOPOLOGICAL QUANTUM FIELD THEORY

We then have an analogous theorem. Theorem 1.2.

Broken pencils and four-manifold invariants. Tim Perutz (Cambridge)

An Introduction to the Stolz-Teichner Program

A users guide to K-theory

Representation homology and derived character maps

An Invitation to Geometric Quantization

Lefschetz pencils and the symplectic topology of complex surfaces

Defects in topological field theory: from categorical tools to applications in physics and representation theory

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

Deformation groupoids and index theory

Formal Homotopy Quantum Field Theories and 2-groups.

Derived Poisson structures and higher character maps

VERLINDE ALGEBRA LEE COHN. Contents

1 Categorical Background

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

Topological Field Theories in Homotopy Theory I

NOTES ON ATIYAH S TQFT S

arxiv: v2 [math.rt] 4 May 2017

THE QUANTUM DOUBLE AS A HOPF ALGEBRA

The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras

Remarks on Chern-Simons Theory. Dan Freed University of Texas at Austin

arxiv: v2 [math.qa] 14 Dec 2018

GENERATORS FOR COMONOIDS AND UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTIONS

arxiv: v1 [math.gt] 23 Apr 2014

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

The Nori Fundamental Group Scheme

Representations and Linear Actions

IGA Lecture I: Introduction to G-valued moment maps

Towards a modular functor from quantum higher Teichmüller theory

Elementary (super) groups

Lecture 21 - Jordan Algebras and Projective Spaces

DIFFEOMORPHISMS OF SURFACES AND SMOOTH 4-MANIFOLDS

Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism

DERIVED HAMILTONIAN REDUCTION

A formula for the action of Dehn twists on the HOMFLY-PT type skein algebra and its application

LECTURE 5: SOME BASIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN SYMPLECTIC TOPOLOGY

Holomorphic symplectic fermions

CHERN-SIMONS THEORY AND LINK INVARIANTS! Dung Nguyen! U of Chicago!

Math 535a Homework 5

Morse theory and stable pairs

Classification of definable groupoids and Zariski geometries

Structures in tangent categories

Lecture 4 Super Lie groups

The Dirac operator on quantum SU(2)

Hodge Structures. October 8, A few examples of symmetric spaces

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

Thus we get. ρj. Nρj i = δ D(i),j.

The Based Loop Group of SU(2) Lisa Jeffrey. Department of Mathematics University of Toronto. Joint work with Megumi Harada and Paul Selick

CATEGORICAL GROTHENDIECK RINGS AND PICARD GROUPS. Contents. 1. The ring K(R) and the group Pic(R)

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY

AN INTRODUCTION TO MODULI SPACES OF CURVES CONTENTS

Topological K-theory

On some conjectures on VOAs

1 Recall. Algebraic Groups Seminar Andrei Frimu Talk 4: Cartier Duality

Projective Dehn twist

Homological Mirror Symmetry and VGIT

LECTURE 3 MATH 261A. Office hours are now settled to be after class on Thursdays from 12 : 30 2 in Evans 815, or still by appointment.

Shunsuke TSUJI. Skein algebras and mapping class groups on oriented surfaces. The University of Tokyo

3-manifold Invariants and TQFT s

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.at] 5 Feb 2000

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 1 Oct 2018

PSEUDO-ANOSOV MAPS AND SIMPLE CLOSED CURVES ON SURFACES

BERTRAND GUILLOU. s G q+r

ALGEBRAS IN MONOIDAL CATEGORIES

Representation theory of W-algebras and Higgs branch conjecture

Representations of the Kau man Bracket Skein Algebra of a Surface

Geometry of Conformal Field Theory

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

Lecture 15: Duality. Next we spell out the answer to Exercise It is part of the definition of a TQFT.

Cambridge University Press Frobenius Algebras and 2D Topological Quantum Field Theories Joachim Kock Excerpt More information

Atiyah classes and homotopy algebras

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

Topological Field Theories

Vector Bundles and Projective Modules. Mariano Echeverria

Conformal field theory in the sense of Segal, modified for a supersymmetric context

Geometry of moduli spaces

TOPOLOGICAL K-THEORY

WHAT IS K-HOMOLOGY? Paul Baum Penn State. Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA. April 2, 2014

ON COSTELLO S CONSTRUCTION OF THE WITTEN GENUS: L SPACES AND DG-MANIFOLDS

ON POSITIVITY OF KAUFFMAN BRACKET SKEIN ALGEBRAS OF SURFACES

Structure of Compact Quantum Groups A u (Q) and B u (Q) and their Isomorphism Classification

Categories and functors

TEICHMÜLLER SPACE MATTHEW WOOLF

The generally covariant locality principle and an extension to gauge symmetries

THE CANONICAL PENCILS ON HORIKAWA SURFACES

Berezin-Töplitz Quantization Math 242 Term Paper, Spring 1999 Ilan Hirshberg

RTG Mini-Course Perspectives in Geometry Series

Varieties of Characters

Higher Categories, Homotopy Theory, and Applications

Lecture 17: Invertible Topological Quantum Field Theories

Universal K-matrices via quantum symmetric pairs

Transcription:

Mapping class groups of surfaces and quantization Sasha Patotski Cornell University ap744@cornell.edu May 13, 2016 Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 1 / 16

Plan 1 Mapping class groups. 2 Quantum representations from skein theory. 3 Quantum representations from geometric quantization. 4 Character varieties as the tensor product of functors. Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 2 / 16

Mapping class group of a surface Let Σ g be a closed compact oriented surface of genus g. Definition The mapping class group M(Σ g ) is the group of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms modulo isotopy: / M g := M(Σ g ) := Diff + (Σ g ) Diff + 0 (Σ g ) Examples: 1 M(S 2 ) = {1}; 2 M(T) SL 2 (Z). Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 3 / 16

Structure of M(Σ g ) Theorem (Dehn) M g is generated by Dehn twists along non-separating circles in Σ g. Fact: M g is a finitely presented group, there are explicit generators and relations. Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 4 / 16

Skein modules and algebras Definition Fix ξ C. For a 3-manifold N, the skein module K ξ (N) is a C-vector space spanned by the isotopy classes of (framed) links in N modulo the skein relations: Fact: K ξ (S 3 ) C. Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 5 / 16

Skein pairing and the action of M(Σ) Σ S 3 such that S 3 \ Σ = H H is the union of two handlebodies, let ξ = 4k+8 1., : K ξ (H) K ξ (H ) K ξ (S 3 ) C, : V k V k C Need: define how Dehn twists acts on V k. Fact: if γ bounds a disk in H, the Dehn twist τ γ acts on K ξ (H), inducing an action on V k. Similarly, for γ bounding a disk in H, τ γ acts on V k. Note: using the pairing, τ γ also act on V k. Fact: This gives a well-defined action of M(Σ) on P(V k ). Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 6 / 16

Quantum representations Definition Call P(V k ) the quantum representation of M g of level k. Theorem (Lickorish) Spaces V k are finite dimensional, and their dimension is ( k + 2 d g (k) := 2 ) g 1 k+1 j=1 ( sin πj ) 2 2g k + 2 Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 7 / 16

Character variety Let Γ be a group, and G a compact Lie group. Let Rep(Γ, G) be the variety of representations of Γ into G. Example: Rep(Z, G) G; Example: Rep(Z Z, G) = {(A, B) G G AB = BA}. Note: G acts on Rep(Γ, G) by conjugation. The quotient X (Γ, G) = Rep(Γ, G)/G is called the character variety. Note: in general Rep(Γ, G) is quite singular, even for nice Γ. Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 8 / 16

Character variety of surface groups Let Γ = π 1 (Σ, x 0 ) a 1,..., a g, b 1,..., b g [a 1, b 1 ]... [a g, b g ] = 1. Then X (Γ, G) {(A 1,..., B g ) G 2g [A 1, B 1 ]... [A g, B g ] = 1}/G. X (Γ, G) is singular, and let X reg X (Γ, G) be the regular part. Theorem (Atiyah Bott) For simply-connected G, X reg has a natural symplectic form ω. The form ω only depends on the choice of a symmetric form on g = Lie(G). Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 9 / 16

Geometric quantization Fact: there exists a line bundle L on X reg such that c 1 (L) = [ω] Pick σ a complex structure on Σ. Then σ complex structure on X reg. X Xσ reg a complex manifold, and L L σ a holomorphic line bundle. Let W k,σ := H 0 (X reg, L k σ ) the space of holomorphic sections. Theorem There is a natural action of the mapping class group M(Σ) on the spaces P(W k,σ ). Moreover, W k,σ are finite dimensional, and for G = SU(2) ( k + 2 dim(w k,σ ) = 2 ) g 1 k+1 j=1 ( sin πj ) 2 2g k + 2 Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 10 / 16

Main Theorem Theorem (Andersen Ueno) The projective representations P(V k ) and P(W k ) of the mapping class group M(σ) are isomorphic. Remarks: 1 Both constructions can be carried for any compact simply-connected Lie group G. 2 In skein theory: choice of H, H, k comes from ξ = 4k+8 1. In geom.quant.: choice of complex structure σ, k comes from kω. Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 11 / 16

Category H Let H be a symmetric monoidal category with Ob(H) = N = {[0], [1], [2],... }, [n] [m] := [n + m], and Mor(H) generated by m : [2] [1], η : [0] [1], S : [1] [1] : [1] [2], ε: [1] [0], τ : [2] [2] satisfying the obvious (?) axioms. Graphically, Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 12 / 16

Relations in H Note: cocommutative Hopf algebras monoidal functors F : H Vect. Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 13 / 16

Representation and character varieties Any functors F : H Vect K and E : H op Vect K give E H F Vect K. If F, E are weakly monoidal, then E H F is an algebra. Let Γ be a discrete group, and G be an affine algebraic group. Then K[Γ] is a cocommutative Hopf algebra, K(G) is a commutative Hopf algebra, and so they define functors F Γ : H Vect, Theorem (Kassabov P) [n] K[Γ] n E G : H op Vect, [n] K(G) n K(G n ) E G : Hop Vect, [n] K(G n ) G. There are natural algebra isomorphisms E G H F Γ K(Rep(Γ, G)) E G H F Γ K(X (Γ, G)) Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 14 / 16

Quantization Character variety: K(X (Γ, G)) E G H F Γ = n Idea: quantize K(G), K[Γ] and H. Assume: Γ = π 1 (Σ) Replace: K[Γ] n K(G n ) G K[Γ] n / K{n-tuples of ribbons in Σ (, 0] with ends in a small fixed disk on Σ {0}} Replace: K(G) K q (G), the corresponding quantum group. Replace: H R a certain category with objects being slits in an annulus and morphisms being ribbons in the cylinder, connecting the slits. Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 15 / 16

Category R Morphisms in R are ribbon analogs of the morphisms in H: Σ gives a functor F Σ : R Vect K, and K q (G) gives E Kq(G) : R op Vect. Theorem (Kassabov P) F Σ R E Kq(G) is a (non-commutative) algebra quantizing K(X (Γ, G)). Sasha Patotski (Cornell University) Quantization May 13, 2016 16 / 16