= s j Ui U j. i, j, then s F(U) with s Ui F(U) G(U) F(V ) G(V )

Similar documents
DIFFERENTIAL SCHEMES

where a is any ideal of R. Lemma 5.4. Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space Moreover the open sets

where a is any ideal of R. Lemma Let R be a ring. Then X = Spec R is a topological space. Moreover the open sets

Lecture 7: Gluing prevarieties; products

3 Holonomic D-Modules

12 MATH 101A: ALGEBRA I, PART C: MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA. 4. Tensor product

Math 101 Fall 2013 Homework #7 Due Friday, November 15, 2013

DIFFERENTIAL FORMS BRIAN OSSERMAN

Descent is a technique which allows construction of a global object from local data.

FACTORIZATION IN KRULL MONOIDS WITH INFINITE CLASS GROUP

POL VAN HOFTEN (NOTES BY JAMES NEWTON)

LECTURE V. 1. More on the Chinese Remainder Theorem We begin by recalling this theorem, proven in the preceeding lecture.

Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Representation theory and quantum conservation laws

INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 13

An Introduction to Morita Theory

APPENDIX A Some Linear Algebra

Linear, affine, and convex sets and hulls In the sequel, unless otherwise specified, X will denote a real vector space.

ON FIBRANT OBJECTS IN MODEL CATEGORIES

Graph Reconstruction by Permutations

Topics in Geometry: Mirror Symmetry

Week 2. This week, we covered operations on sets and cardinality.

FINITELY-GENERATED MODULES OVER A PRINCIPAL IDEAL DOMAIN

R n α. . The funny symbol indicates DISJOINT union. Define an equivalence relation on this disjoint union by declaring v α R n α, and v β R n β

n-strongly Ding Projective, Injective and Flat Modules

2.3 Nilpotent endomorphisms

REDUCTION MODULO p. We will prove the reduction modulo p theorem in the general form as given by exercise 4.12, p. 143, of [1].

ALGEBRA MID-TERM. 1 Suppose I is a principal ideal of the integral domain R. Prove that the R-module I R I has no non-zero torsion elements.

MATH 241B FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS - NOTES EXAMPLES OF C ALGEBRAS

Lectures - Week 4 Matrix norms, Conditioning, Vector Spaces, Linear Independence, Spanning sets and Basis, Null space and Range of a Matrix

Morphisms of Coloured Petri Nets

Errata to Invariant Theory with Applications January 28, 2017

Solutions of exercise sheet 3

THERE ARE NO POINTS OF ORDER 11 ON ELLIPTIC CURVES OVER Q.

2 MADALINA ROXANA BUNECI subset G (2) G G (called the set of composable pars), and two maps: h (x y)! xy : G (2)! G (product map) x! x ;1 [: G! G] (nv

A Simple Research of Divisor Graphs

( 1) i [ d i ]. The claim is that this defines a chain complex. The signs have been inserted into the definition to make this work out.

Restricted Lie Algebras. Jared Warner

COMPLEX NUMBERS AND QUADRATIC EQUATIONS

20. Mon, Oct. 13 What we have done so far corresponds roughly to Chapters 2 & 3 of Lee. Now we turn to Chapter 4. The first idea is connectedness.

SL n (F ) Equals its Own Derived Group

Polynomials. 1 More properties of polynomials

Bitopological spaces via Double topological spaces

ALGEBRA HW 7 CLAY SHONKWILER

Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly consisting of a single public firm and foreign competitors. Abstract

LEVEL SET OF INTUITIONTISTIC FUZZY SUBHEMIRINGS OF A HEMIRING

Affine transformations and convexity

ALGEBRA SCHEMES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

Categorical lattice-valued topology Lecture 2: lattice-valued topological systems

THE CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM. We should thank the Chinese for their wonderful remainder theorem. Glenn Stevens

The transfer in modular invariant theory 1

MTH 819 Algebra I S13. Homework 1/ Solutions. 1 if p n b and p n+1 b 0 otherwise ) = 0 if p q or n m. W i = rw i

ALGEBRA SCHEMES AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS

DECOUPLING THEORY HW2

princeton univ. F 17 cos 521: Advanced Algorithm Design Lecture 7: LP Duality Lecturer: Matt Weinberg

HOPF ALGEBRAS WITH TRACE AND CLEBSCH-GORDAN COEFFICIENTS. 1. Recollections and the problem

Subset Topological Spaces and Kakutani s Theorem

Characterizing the properties of specific binomial coefficients in congruence relations

Section 8.3 Polar Form of Complex Numbers

Smarandache-Zero Divisors in Group Rings

NP-Completeness : Proofs

5 The Rational Canonical Form

ÉTALE COHOMOLOGY. Contents

Example: (13320, 22140) =? Solution #1: The divisors of are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 27, 30, 36, 41,

k(k 1)(k 2)(p 2) 6(p d.

PRIMES 2015 reading project: Problem set #3

LIMITS OF ALGEBRAIC STACKS

Zeros and Zero Dynamics for Linear, Time-delay System

Spring Force and Power

DISCRIMINANTS AND RAMIFIED PRIMES. 1. Introduction A prime number p is said to be ramified in a number field K if the prime ideal factorization

Intuitionistic Fuzzy G δ -e-locally Continuous and Irresolute Functions

A Brown representability theorem via coherent functors

Quantum Mechanics I - Session 4

Inner Product. Euclidean Space. Orthonormal Basis. Orthogonal

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gr] 24 Oct 2006

A Note on \Modules, Comodules, and Cotensor Products over Frobenius Algebras"

a b a In case b 0, a being divisible by b is the same as to say that

Lecture 3. Ax x i a i. i i

Genericity of Critical Types

LOCAL COHOMOLOGY AND D-MODULES

Exercise Solutions to Real Analysis

arxiv:alg-geom/ v3 6 Mar 2014

BRAUER GROUPS, MONDAY: DIVISION ALGEBRAS

On the smoothness and the totally strong properties for nearness frames

THE CLASS NUMBER THEOREM

A CHARACTERIZATION OF ADDITIVE DERIVATIONS ON VON NEUMANN ALGEBRAS

8.6 The Complex Number System

Mednykh s Formula. Kevin Donoghue. January 29, 2016

Non-additive geometry

Review of metric spaces. 1. Metric spaces, continuous maps, completeness

Problem Set 9 Solutions

K-theoretic computations in enumerative geometry

THE ACYCLICITY OF THE FROBENIUS FUNCTOR FOR MODULES OF FINITE FLAT DIMENSION

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 9 Nov 2018

42. Mon, Dec. 8 Last time, we were discussing CW complexes, and we considered two di erent CW structures on S n. We continue with more examples.

Fixed points of IA-endomorphisms of a free metabelian Lie algebra

Valuations compatible with a projection

9 Characteristic classes

Math 594. Solutions 1

Differential Polynomials

Spectral Graph Theory and its Applications September 16, Lecture 5

Transcription:

1 Lecture 2 Recap Last tme we talked about presheaves and sheaves. Preshea: F on a topologcal space X, wth groups (resp. rngs, sets, etc.) F(U) or each open set U X, wth restrcton homs ρ UV : F(U) F(V ) or all open V U, satsyng certan condtons (ρ UU = d U, ρ UW = ρ V W ρ UV, F( ) = 0). Shea: In addton, we also requre dentty and glung. Identty: Gven U = U, s F(U) s.t. s U = 0, then s = 0. (locally zero everywhere zero) Glung: Gven s F(U ) s.t. s U U j = s j U U j, j, then s F(U) wth s U = s. (suces to gve a uncton locally, agreeng on overlaps) Remark: F( ) = 0 s not mpled by ether the preshea condtons, nor by consderng presheaves as a contravarant unctor Op(X) Ab. It s appled axomatcally by conventon. For sheaves, t s mpled by glung (e.g. consder a cover o the empty set). Moral: don t worry about t. Morphsms o (Pre)sheaves: φ : F G. A seres o morphsms φ(u) : F(U) G(U) or every open set U, that commute wth restrcton maps: F(U) ρ φ(u) G(U) ρ F(V ) G(V ) A morphsm s an somorphsm t has an nverse. φ(v ) Stalks: F p = lmf(u) = F(U)/ = {(s, U) s F(U)}/, where (s, U) (s, U ) V U U p U such that s V = s V. More sheaves Stalks package most o the normaton we want. A morphsm o (pre)sheaves φ : F G nduces a homomorphsm on stalks, φ p : F p G p,.e. φ p (s, U) = (φ(u)s, U). Ths s well-dened, or (s, U) = (s, U ), then because φ commutes wth restrctons, φ p (s, U) = φ p (s, U ). Ths gves another characterzaton o somorphsms. Proposton. (H, Prop.II.1.1): Let F G be a morphsm o sheaves. Then φ s an somorphsm and only φ p s an somorphsm p X. Sheacaton: Every preshea has an assocated shea. Gven a preshea F, we dene a shea F + called the sheacaton o F, as ollows: F + (U) = {unctons s : U F p s(p) F p, and p U, V wth p V U and t F(V ) such that s(q) = t q q V, where t q = (t, V ) F q } These are unctons whch map nto the dsjont unon o the stalks, where we requre that p s mapped nto the stalk at p, and locally the choces o stalks are related. Usually presheaves al to be sheaves

2 when they don t satsy the glung axom. The + constructon xes ths by addng n enough elements to allow glung. Exercse: 1. F + s a shea. 2. There s a natural morphsm o presheaves θ : F F + such that s F(U) s + : U F p, wth s + (p) = s p = (s, U). 3. Unversal property. For any shea F and a morphsm o presheaves φ : F G there exsts a unque ψ : F + G such that: F F + F + s the smplest possble shea we could assocate to F. The + constructon s useul because sometmes when we do an operaton on a shea, we only get a preshea, so then we need to sheay. Denton: Let φ : F G be a morphsm o (pre)sheaves. The preshea kernel o φ s U ker φ(u) The preshea cokernel o φ s U coker φ(u) = G(U)/φ(U) The preshea mage o φ s U φ(u) Each o the φ(u) are group homomorphsms, so t makes sense to talk about kernels, etc. These are subpresheaves o F (or ker φ) or G (or the other two). I F and G are sheaves, then preshea kernel s n act a shea (check ths!), and the shea kernel (ker φ) s dened as ths. But the shea cokernel (coker φ) and shea mage (m φ) are the sheacatons o the preshea cokernel and mages. Surjectvty doesn t mean what you thnk t does. We say φ : F G s njectve ker φ = 0. We say φ : F G s surjectve m φ = G. G!ψ Ane Schemes From now on, R wll always be a commutatve rng wth dentty (not necessarly Noetheran). To talk about geometry, we need a topologcal space and a noton o unctons. Sheaves gve us a way o talkng about unctons. Denton: An ane scheme, Spec R, s a topologcal space, wth a shea o rngs O SpecR, ts structure shea. Examples to keep n mnd when thnkng about these dentons: ) thnk o R as a coordnate rng o a varety - or even k[x 1,..., x n ]; ) thnk o R as the most pathologcal example magnable. A shea o rngs means a shea where O SpecR (U) s a rng open U and the homs are rng homs. The topologcal space Spec R s the set o all prme deals n R. We place the Zarsk topology on Spec R : the closed sets are V (I) = {P : P I} or an deal I R. (Check!) Ths s a topology. V (I J) = V (I) V (J) and V (I + J) = V (I) V (J). Proo s the same as or varetes. Examples:

3 1. R = Z. Spec Z = {0} pz, p prme. V((2)) V((3)) V((5)) V((7)) [(0)] generc pont Notce we have closed ponts (e.g. 2, 3, 5,...) and not closed ponts (0, whose closure s Spec Z because 0 (p), (p)). 2. R = k[x]. The prme deals are (), rreducble. I k = k, then Spec R = (0), (x a), a k. (x a) are the closed ponts; navely they look lke A 1. We also have the generc pont (0). I k = R, then Spec R = (0), (x a), and (x 2 + ax + b) such that a 2 4b < 0. Agan the (x a) and (x 2 + ax + b) are closed ponts, and the closure o (0) s Spec R. I k = Z/2Z, then Spec R s nnte = (0), (x), (x + 1), (x 2 + x + 1),... Agan (0) s a generc pont, the others are closed. Observe that A 1 here s not a two pont set, as mght be expected. The space remembers the orbts o ponts over the algebrac closure. 3. R = k[x 1,..., x n ], k = k. I (0) s prme (ntegral doman) t wll always be dense. (x 1 a 1,..., x n a n ) are closed ponts (0satz). Any rreducble subvarety o A n corresponds to a prme deal. The closure o a such a prme contans all the ponts on t. The shea o rngs. To gve the shea o rngs on our topologcal space, we make use o a bass or the topology. For any R, we have the basc open set D() = {P SpecR : / P }. The set o all D() orms a bass or the Zarsk topology. (c. HW1 Q4) Gven a shea we can recover t by just knowng t on a bass. We ll dene the structure shea O SpecR by denng t on the bass,.e. we ll gve a rng or every D() such that t gves a shea on the base (check restrctons, d, glung). Dene: O SpecR (D()) = R. R s R localzed at the multplcatvely closed set (a set closed under products, ncludng the empty product 1) {1,, 2,...}. That s, R = { r r r R, m 0}/, where m m r j such that n j ( n r m r ) = 0. It s lke ractons, but a more general equvalence relaton to take care o zero dvsors. In partcular, = 1, O SpecR (D(1)) = R, called the global sectons. In the case R s the coordnate rng o a varety, the polynomal unctons on a varety, then n a nave varety sense, D() s the set o ponts where s nonzero, so ratonal unctons wth n the denomnator are stll well-dened unctons on the varety. Now we want to check ths denton actually gves us a shea on the base. For ths we start wth a couple o commutatve algebra results. Lemma. I I s an deal o R dsjont rom a multplcatvely closed set U, then an deal P, maxmal wth respect to contanng I and dsjont rom U, s prme. Proo. I, g / P, then P + (), P + (g) are larger deals contanng I, so u 1 P + (), u 2 P + (g), wth u 1, u 2 U. So, u 1 = p 1 + r 1, u 2 = p 2 + r 2 g. Snce u 1 u 2 / P, then g / P. Corollary. I D() D(g), then m > 0 such that m (g). Proo. I not, (g) s dsjont rom U = {1,, 2,...} so by the lemma P D() \ D(g).

4 Thus, D() D(g), we have m = gr or some r, so we have a homomorphsm R g R, a arn gn g n r n = arn mn so restrcton s straghtorward. When D() D(g) D(h), ths satses R h R R g Ths s a preshea on the base. We now check ths preshea s a shea on the base, that t sates dentty and glung. Suppose now that we have an open cover D() = I D( ). Frst, we clam that m > 0 such that m (, I). Otherwse, the lemma gves P ( ) avodng U = {1,, 2,...}, whch s a contradcton. Also, as beore, snce D( ) D(), we can wrte m = r or some m, r I. Identty: (secton vanshes all ts restrctons do). Suppose a/ n R satses ar n/ m n = 0 1 R. Then N such that N ar n = 0. So 0 = n N ar n = N +m n a. Snce m (, I), then or some N 0, N ( N +m n, I). So N = b N +m n or some b R. Then N a = b N +m n a = 0 and a/ n = 0/1 n R. Glung: (Gven sectons o D( ) agreeng on overlaps, can construct a secton o D()). Notce that our open cover D() = I D( ) may be assumed nte, although we haven t made any assumptons about Noetheranness o rngs. Elements o deals are only nte sums, m = J b, J <. Ths mples D() = J D( ), because any prme not contanng m, and thereore, must omt one o the, J. Every cover does have a nte subcover ( quas-compactness ); but we wll see later that properness s a more useul generalzaton o compactness. Clam: It suces to check glung only on nte covers. Suppose we are gven s = a a n j ( j ) = a j nj n n R, I wth ( j ) n j R j. It then suces to show there s s R wth s D( ) = s, J. Identty wll mply s D( ) = s, I (thnk about ths). (clam) The nte cover enables us to take a maxmum over the exponents that show up. Snce s D( ) D( j ) = s j D( ) D( j ),, j J, Ñ such that ( j )Ñ( n j j a n a j ) = 0 n R. We use nteness here - or pars, we can make ractons have the same denomnator, so assume all pars have the same denomnator. Then snce J s nte, renamng a s necessary, we may assume that n = n j = N,, j and Ñ = 0,.e. j Na N a j = 0 n R. We can wrte m = J c N or some m 0, and set g = J c a. We clam g m D( ) = s. Indeed N g = j J N c j a j = j J c ja j N = a m, and so (recall m = r ) g m D( ) = grm m m D( ) = a = s N. So we have glung. We have now shown that we do have a shea on the base. We could also have done ths another way. The approach n H s to gve the ollowng denton, and ths s then proved to be the same as the way we dened t usng a base. We wll dscuss ths

5 urther next tme. Also, recall that the localzaton at a prme deal R p s dened wth R \ p as the multplcatvely closed set. Proposton. a) The stalk (O SpecR ) p o (O SpecR ) at p s the localzaton R p. b) (O SpecR )(U) s the unctons {s : U R p s(p) R p ; and p U, V Uand a, R, such that Q V and / Q, s(q) = a/ R q }