Guideline. Mary O Grady Quality Assessment Manager. IMB New Variations Regulation Information Day /01/2010 Slide 1

Similar documents
Regulation 6 months experience. Sonia Ribeiro 1-2 June 2010, London, UK

New Variations Regulation. NCA & CMDh. Peter Bachmann 1-2 June 2010, London, UK. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte

Q/A-LIST FOR THE SUBMISSION OF VARIATIONS ACCORDING TO COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) 1234/2008

Grouping and Annual Reporting. Agenda. Grouping of extension and other variations

Switching from Paper to ectd: Real life examples

Swiss Medic Training Sampling

Fact sheet on Intermediates under REACH

Letter to non European Union customers

Properties criteria - BETA

Chemical Legislation and Regulations Updates: Japan

Substance Name: 2,2-bis(4'-hydroxyphenyl)-4- methylpentane EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF

THE USE OF IONISING RADIATION IN THE MANUFACTURE OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Properties criteria - BETA

M4 Implementation Working Group Questions & Answers (R3) Current version dated June 10, 2004

Regulatory use of (Q)SARs under REACH

VERSION 3.0 MARKS & SPENCER NOVEMBER 2015 ECP MINUMUM STANDARDS REACH. Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals

Hazard Communication Standard and GHS Update. Maureen Ruskin Deputy Director Directorate of Standards and Guidance

Guidance for Industry M4: The CTD General Questions and Answers

New Policies on Chemical Environmental Management in China. Gao Yingxin Chemical Registration Center of MEP September 9, 2010

B REGULATION (EU) No 649/2012 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 July 2012 concerning the export and import of hazardous chemicals

INTRODUCTION. REACH Compliance. Importers / Retailers. Delhi,

ICH Topic M 4 Common Technical Document for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Questions and Answers. Step 5

CTD General Questions and Answers

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE (CVMP)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, XXX D046374/04 [ ](2016) XXX draft ANNEX 1 ANNEX

Annex XV dossier. PROPOSAL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF A SUBSTANCE AS A CMR 1A OR 1B, PBT, vpvb OR A SUBSTANCE OF AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF CONCERN

Materials Approach using the Toyograph CAS Number Approach

why open access publication of stability date is essential Mark Santillo Regional QA Officer SW England

Study of REACH Regulation in EU about Electrolytic Capacitor

Application of RIP 3.10 on Guidance for identification and naming of substances

China Chemical Regulations Overview

Guide to Registration Requirements for Active Substance Manufacturers, Importers and Distributors in Ireland

RPR 29 CYCLOTRON RADIOCHEMISTRY LABORATORY

Draft agreed by the QWP June Draft endorsed by the CMD(v) June Draft adopted by the CVMP for release for consultation July 2016

REACH. Federation of Hong Kong Industries 17 th January, Heribert Bürgy Chemical Division Market Control and Advice

COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS

IBIDEN Group Green Procurement Guidelines. (Version 6)

Derogation Criteria for the Requirements for Generators Network Code

Materials U.S. Perspective

Step-by-Step Guide to the REACH Regulations

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Brussels, XXX [ ](2015) XXX draft ANNEX 1 ANNEX

Assessment and Regulation of Nanomaterials under the European Biocides Regulation Isabel Günther

Larry R. Glass, Ph.D., M.P.H. Xerox Corporation

Update of current activities

Globally Harmonized System Update

Enquiry. Demonstration of Uniformity of Dosage Units using Large Sample Sizes. Proposal for a new general chapter in the European Pharmacopoeia

European harmonisation of product notification- Status 2014

Polymers (Toxic [6.1]) Group Standard HSR002645

Chemical Control Legislation In Japan

Globally Harmonized Systems A Brave New OSHA HazComm

COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CHMP) COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS (CVMP)

Head of the Certification of Substances Division, EDQM

REACH Pre-registration & Registration - Questions and Answers

Pharmaceutical Active Ingredients Group Standard 2017 HSR100425

What is a Registered Substance Factsheet? May 2018

Responsibilities: Effective Date: November Revision Date: February 8, VP, Facilities and Construction Management. Issuing Authority:

The Acta Group K-REACH Webinar Questions and Answers December 4, 2014

Tim Bowmer. TNO Quality of Life Zeist, The Netherlands

Polymers (Toxic [6.7]) Group Standard HSR002646

Substance identification and how to report it in IUCLID 6

Harmonisation of product notification. Ronald de Groot Dutch Poisons Information Center

REACH: HOW IT AFFECTS PSA TAPES

Proposals to address issues from the programme of work for the practical classification issues correspondence group

The Danish register for mandatory registration of nanoproducts. Flemming Ingerslev, Section of Chemicals The Danish Environmental Protection Agency

(2) those made, wholly or partially, of the raw materials from the region and produced or processed with the particular techniques in the region;

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

Nanomaterials, REACH and CLP - what is going on at the regulatory front

The role of the authorities, SVHC substances, data issues

Introduction to E&Ls 1

Guidance for Industry

Corrosion Inhibitors (Corrosive) Group Standard HSR002547

GUIDELINES OF PROCUREMENT - CHEMICALS FOR RESEARCH CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT CENTRE

< Instructions to Suppliers concerning the placing on the market and use of

Substance Name: Dimethyl sulphate. EC Number: CAS Number: SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR IDENTIFICATION OF DIMETHYL SULPHATE

Nanomaterials under REACH

Gas Under Pressure Mixtures (Toxic [6.1]) Group Standard HSR002536

Embalming Products (Flammable, Toxic [6.1], Corrosive) Group Standard HSR002564

Starting Materials For Active Substances

PART II VIII. CONCERNING CHEMICAL. PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DOCUMENTATION FOR RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS.

Class 4, Toxic [6.1] Substances Group Standard HSR002523

Quality by Design and Analytical Methods

An extrapolation framework to specify requirements for drug development in children

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW VARIETIES OF PLANTS TECHNICAL WORKING PARTY FOR ORNAMENTAL PLANTS AND FOREST TREES

Policy landscape: the role of REACH in chemicals management

Chemical Regulations in CHINA. - Actions needed to become compliant -

Part A: Preparing a PCN dossier

The Group of Representative Bodies (GRB) Position Paper on the EC Expert Group on the Technical Pillar of the 4th Railway Package Topics

Fertilisers (Subsidiary Hazard) Group Standard HSR002571

Reagent Kits Group Standard HSR002647

Applications for the approval of free radicals and other in situ generated substances: experiences and challenges

Leather and Textile Products (Subsidiary Hazard) Group Standard HSR002600

ESTA governance Quality Assurance System for Seed Treatment and Treated Seed

Arizona Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 800 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ Consultation:

Solvents (Flammable) Group Standard HSR002650

2018 PROCESSOR INVENTORY NOTIFICATION ACTIVE-INACTIVE REQUIREMENTS

Water Treatment Chemicals (Toxic [6.1]) Group Standard HSR002685

State-of-the-science in Metrology & Metrics for Nanomaterials Regulation

Independence and Dependence in Calibration: A Discussion FDA and EMA Guidelines

County of Cortland HAZARD COMUNICATION POLICY

Lubricants (Low Hazard) Group Standard HSR002605

Transcription:

The EC Classification Guideline IMB New Variations Regulation Information Day 2010 Mary O Grady Quality Assessment Manager Irish Medicines Board 22/01/2010 Slide 1

The EC Classification Guideline Background Types of Variations Classifications Some Examples Impactp 22/01/2010 Slide 2

Background Variation amendment to the contents of a MA dossier Handling of variations requires significant administrative and regulatory resources In 2006, EC announced its intention to make the variation regulations simpler, clearer and more flexible Aim: reduction of administrative burden to industry, simplification of the procedures (Better regulation) One regulation 1234/2008 not two (ex- 1084/2003 & 1085/2003) 22/01/2010 Slide 3

Background 22/01/2010 Slide 4

Background 05/01/2010 FINAL Variation Guidelines published on EC Website http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/phareuropa eu/enterprise/sectors/phar maceuticals/files/betterreg/pharmacos/cla ssification_guideline_adopted.pdf 22/01/2010 Slide 5

The EC Classification Guideline Background Types of Variations Classifications Some Examples Impactp 22/01/2010 Slide 6

Types of Variations Changes not requiring any prior approval - Minor Type IA changes -Changes within an approved design space Changes requiring prior approval - Minor type IB changes - Major Type II changes - Extensions IA IB II Ext Assessment to reflect level of risk 22/01/2010 Slide 7

Types of Variations Type IA Variation which has minimal impact, or no impact, on the quality, safety or efficacy Type IA and Type IA IN All do and tell Notify immediately IA IN Notify within 12 months of the implementation of the change IA Rejection? May be required to cease to apply change 22/01/2010 Slide 8

Types of Variations Type II Variation which is not an extension and which may have a significant impact on the quality, safety or efficacy of the medicinal product Type IB Default category Variation which is not a type IA, type II or an extension. Require prior approval 22/01/2010 Slide 9

Types of Variations Extensions defined in Annex I of the Regulation (e.g. new pharmaceutical form) No real change. Similar to previous regulations Type IA and Type II high level classification in Annex II of the regulation Classification guideline detailed guidance on classification of types IA, IB and II 22/01/2010 Slide 10

The EC Classification Guideline Background Types of Variations The Classification Guideline Some Examples Impactp 22/01/2010 Slide 11

The Classification Guideline Guideline will now cover all aspects of MA dossier Type IA and Type IA IN - Do and tell Type II s listed Type IB is now default category No definitive list of IB examples included Guideline can be regularly updated in light of scientific progress Pharmacovigilance - some now specified 22/01/2010 Slide 12

The Classification Guideline Guideline Format Introduction a) Administrative Changes b) Quality Changes c) Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacovigilance changes d) Plasma and Vaccine Antigen Master Files 22/01/2010 Slide 13

The Classification Guideline 22/01/2010 Slide 14

The Classification Guideline Variation Numbering system B.II.a.4 Chapter Section Subsection Variation No. 22/01/2010 Slide 15

The Classification Guideline Introduction Definition of specification parameter to incorporate its corresponding test method and limits Editorial changes do not require a variation and can be included in a variation concerning that part of the dossier. Compliance with updates to Ph. Eur. monographs. Changes to CEPs require variations to dossier where appropriate 22/01/2010 Slide 16

The Classification Guideline Type IA Conditions and documents listed in guideline Administrative changes primarily type IA e.g. Change in ATC code, Deletion of (multiple) manufacturer (s) Some categories expanded to allow more minor changes as type IA or IAIN e.g. Changes in specification of active substance 22/01/2010 Slide 17

The Classification Guideline Type IB Default category» therefore no conditions No definitive list but some examples included with list of documentation requirements Some IB examples will be familiar from previous guideline e.g. Changes in the composition of the finished product (B.II.a.3) - Expanded to allow possibility of type IA for very minor changes - Specifies several type II 22/01/2010 Slide 18

The Classification Guideline Type II Listed in guideline - no conditions or documentation requirements Some type II familiar as previously default when conditions not met. Some more specific. e.g. Change in site of manufacture (B.II.b.1 is type II for biologicals) Some type II completely new to guideline e.g. Update of dossier following referral (B.V.b.1) Real time or parametric release (B.II.d.3) 22/01/2010 Slide 19

The Classification Guideline 22/01/2010 Slide 20

The Classification Guideline 22/01/2010 Slide 21

The Classification Guideline Submit under correct category Don t include extra changes Fill in application form completely Address all conditions and data requirements Supporting documents must be legible If in doubt. Ask 22/01/2010 Slide 22

The Classification Guideline Is it listed as a type IA Does if fulfill Yes Yes Submit as conditions/doc IA/IAIN requirements? no no Is it listed as a type IB no Yes Submit as IB Is it listed as a type II Yes Submit as II no Does it have impact on Q, S, E no Yes Submit as II Submitas IB 22/01/2010 Slide 23

The EC Classification Guideline Background Types of Variations The Classification Guideline Some Examples Impact p 22/01/2010 Slide 24

Some Examples Section B.I Active substance Changes to manufacturing site some IA (B.I.a.1) Minor changes to manufacturing process IA (B.I.a.2) Addition of new test to specification IA (B.I.b.1 and B.I.b.2) Deletion of a non-significant parameter IA (B.I.b.1) Changes to packaging components many IA (B.I.c.1 B.I.c.3) 22/01/2010 Slide 25

Some Examples Section B.II Finished Product Changes to manufacturing site for sterile products IB (B.II.b.1) Minor changes to manufacturing process IA for some oral dosage forms (B.II.b.3) Change in batch size for sterile product IB (B.II.b.4) Addition of new test to specification some IA (B.II.d.1 and B.II.d.2) 22/01/2010 Slide 26

Some Examples Section B.II Finished Product Deletion of a non-significant parameter IA (B.II.d.1) Shelf life reduction IA (B.II.f.1) Shelf life extension IB (B.II.f.1) Design space B.II.g New = type II Changes within approved = no variation 22/01/2010 Slide 27

Some Examples Insufficient reclassification for Biologicals? They are complex There have been some changes - New CEP with viral safety - Change in scale without process changes - Change physiochemical tests methods for biological products Many remain as type II 22/01/2010 Slide 28

The EC Classification Guideline Background Types of Variations The Classification Guideline Some Examples Impact p 22/01/2010 Slide 29

Impact In 2006, EC announced its intention to make the variation regulations simpler, clearer and more flexible Simpler? Clearer? More flexible? 22/01/2010 Slide 30

Impact Transition phase will be difficult to manage Need to familiarise ourselves with new classifications New systems/workflows to be developed d by industry and regulators Short implementation timeline 22/01/2010 Slide 31

Impact Simplified procedure for unclassified variations (IB default) Do and tell allows implementation of minor changes when needed Flexibility of annual reporting Better use of MS resources Continual updating as experience is gained Same system for national and EU variations 22/01/2010 Slide 32

The EC Classification Guideline In summary The changes are substantial Correct classification is vital New system easier Risk based approach 22/01/2010 Slide 33

The EC Classification Guideline Thank you for your attention. 22/01/2010 Slide 34